Re: Will the real libiconv please stand up! Was : Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv (very boring)
- From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd yahoo com>
- To: Bruno Haible <bruno clisp org>
- Cc: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777 yahoo com>, stefan <stefan lkcc org>, gnuwin32-users lists sourceforge net, koron users sourceforge net, dia-list gnome org, gimpwin-dev yahoogroups com, MinGW-users lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: Will the real libiconv please stand up! Was : Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv (very boring)
- Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 15:10:45 -0400
Bruno Haible wrote:
Strange. With the mingw-2.1 (which I got from
http://www.cygwin.com/mirrors.html,
*not* from http://www.mingw.org/)
libiconv builds out of the box.
Same package loaded by the same maintainer to two different distribution
site. The difference, and this in itself should cause no difference, I
choose to build the Cygwin release with Cygwin's gcc and the MinGW release
with the MinGW gcc.
Earnie.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
