Re: [evolution-patches] Summary crash on quit (#44111)



On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:58, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> This is a case of an idle function being not removed after the objects
> are destroyed.

Okay, but wouldn't it be cleaner to keep an idle_handler id and remove
it in e_summary_folder_clear_folder_store?  Or did you do it like this
because it seems there can be more than one instance of the idle_handler
registered?  Seems like that code could benefit from the addition of an
url queue so that multiple requests could be added to a single idle
handler.

Mike




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]