Re: [evolution-patches] calendar and conduit patches for darwin

[JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>]

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 16:21, Dan Winship wrote:
> Two things I could have sworn we fixed for 1.2.x...
> 
> The calendar change makes it not compile evolution-calendar.idl into
> libevolution-calendar, because it's already in libcal-client (and
> darwin's linker will complain about duplicate symbols).
> 
> The conduit change makes the addressbook conduit not use
> libeconduit-static, paralleling the change already made to the calendar
> and todo conduits. [The reason this is needed is that darwin gets
> annoyed when you try to create a static archive with no members, which
> will happen if you configure without pilot support.]

Conduit bits approved.

> JP: If we can get rid of libeconduit-static, we should be able to get
> rid of *all* of the -static libs, right? [libebook-static,
> libcal-client-static, libcal-util-static, libcamel-static,
> libename-static, libeutil-static, and libical-static]. Should I try that
> out on HEAD?

Sure.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.