On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 10:36 +0100, Jean-Michel POURE wrote: > > If the FSF went evil and took all the code people had assigned and made > > it proprietary, they would be breaking their promises in the assignment > > contract. If the contract was voided then the ownership of the code > > would revert to the original owner, which would mean they had no right > > to change the license on the code. > > Again, the GPL and the FSF have proved very efficient and are not at stake. > > The following [remark was] brought to your attention: > > [2] In the event of the FSF going bust (after a court battle for example), the > judge may not be bound to the FSF contracts. In certain circumstances > (terrorism, war, the FSF going bust, etc...), a judge may be able to rewrite > the FSF contracts and sell its assets to the most offering company. Since when are judges allowed to rewrite contracts? If judges in your country are allowed to do so, I suggest that you consider a relocation.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part