From jayakumar@huawei.com Thu Jul 19 05:26:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gdome@gnome.org Delivered-To: gdome@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102D93B0007 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:26:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 2.605 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.605 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_90_100=0.113, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, L_P0F_Unix=-1, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=1.102, RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID=2.234, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Solaris 9, (distance 17, link: ethernet/modem), [61.144.161.7] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5+BpYNPcPBf for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:26:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [61.144.161.7]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9169F3B0004 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:26:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JLF00H9567VHP@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for gdome@gnome.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:26:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JLF007SN67TDA@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for gdome@gnome.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:26:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from jayakumar1662 ([10.18.23.125]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JLF00KU567OWC@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for gdome@gnome.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:26:17 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:55:55 +0530 From: Jaya Kumar To: gdome@gnome.org Message-id: <000001c7c9e6$d9b83e60$7d17120a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_SGKwAFf1QokXWio59z+8Tw)" Thread-index: AcfJ5s7eOppRiw6jR0q5CHFhwLL5NA== Subject: [gdome] Query X-BeenThere: gdome@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnome DOM development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:26:57 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_SGKwAFf1QokXWio59z+8Tw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi, It is mentioned in the website "http://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/make.html" that - Compiling gdome2 requires: * libxml2 version 2.4.3 * glib version 1.2.0 Can't advanced versions of Libxml2 like 2.6.28 be used? Thanks & Regds., Jaya Kumar --Boundary_(ID_SGKwAFf1QokXWio59z+8Tw) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

 

Hi,

     It is mentioned in the website “http://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/make.html” that –

     Compiling gdome2 requires:

·         libxml2 version 2.4.3

·         glib version 1.2.0

       Can’t advanced versions of Libxml2 like 2.6.28 be used?

Thanks & Regds.,

Jaya Kumar

         

--Boundary_(ID_SGKwAFf1QokXWio59z+8Tw)-- From padovani@sti.uniurb.it Wed Jul 25 05:03:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gdome@gnome.org Delivered-To: gdome@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739C93B00BE for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:03:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Score: -2.444 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.444 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.4 (tstamp-), (distance 17, link: ethernet/modem), [193.205.2.135] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HVFscVWueZ8S for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:03:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from www.sti.uniurb.it (www.sti.uniurb.it [193.205.2.135]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413933B00A2 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:03:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from www.sti.uniurb.it by www.sti.uniurb.it via smtpd (for menubar.gnome.org [209.132.176.177]) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:03:50 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by raffaello.sti.uniurb.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE9F5EB8D; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:03:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cimabue.sti.uniurb.it (cimabue.sti.uniurb.it [192.168.1.211]) by raffaello.sti.uniurb.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0E45EB82; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:03:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.148] (unknown [192.168.1.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cimabue.sti.uniurb.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A6D272D9A; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:04:59 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <000001c7c9e6$d9b83e60$7d17120a@china.huawei.com> References: <000001c7c9e6$d9b83e60$7d17120a@china.huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Luca Padovani Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:03:31 +0200 To: Jaya Kumar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020222 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:23:58 -0400 Cc: gdome@gnome.org Subject: Re: [gdome] Query X-BeenThere: gdome@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnome DOM development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:03:54 -0000 On Jul 19, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Jaya Kumar wrote: > It is mentioned in the website =93http://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/=20 > make.html=94 that =96 > > Compiling gdome2 requires: > > =B7 libxml2 version 2.4.3 > > =B7 glib version 1.2.0 > > Can=92t advanced versions of Libxml2 like 2.6.28 be used? Daniel Veillard (the main developer of libxml) has always been =20 particularly concerned with backward compatibility. My guess is that =20 advanced versions of libxml can be used without problems. Cheers, --luca From jayakumar@huawei.com Thu Jul 19 05:26:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gdome@gnome.org Delivered-To: gdome@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102D93B0007 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:26:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 2.605 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.605 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_90_100=0.113, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, L_P0F_Unix=-1, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=1.102, RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID=2.234, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Solaris 9, (distance 17, link: ethernet/modem), [61.144.161.7] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5+BpYNPcPBf for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:26:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [61.144.161.7]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9169F3B0004 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:26:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JLF00H9567VHP@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for gdome@gnome.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:26:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JLF007SN67TDA@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for gdome@gnome.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:26:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from jayakumar1662 ([10.18.23.125]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JLF00KU567OWC@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for gdome@gnome.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:26:17 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:55:55 +0530 From: Jaya Kumar To: gdome@gnome.org Message-id: <000001c7c9e6$d9b83e60$7d17120a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_SGKwAFf1QokXWio59z+8Tw)" Thread-index: AcfJ5s7eOppRiw6jR0q5CHFhwLL5NA== Subject: [gdome] Query X-BeenThere: gdome@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnome DOM development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:26:57 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_SGKwAFf1QokXWio59z+8Tw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi, It is mentioned in the website "http://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/make.html" that - Compiling gdome2 requires: * libxml2 version 2.4.3 * glib version 1.2.0 Can't advanced versions of Libxml2 like 2.6.28 be used? Thanks & Regds., Jaya Kumar --Boundary_(ID_SGKwAFf1QokXWio59z+8Tw) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

 

Hi,

     It is mentioned in the website “http://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/make.html” that –

     Compiling gdome2 requires:

·         libxml2 version 2.4.3

·         glib version 1.2.0

       Can’t advanced versions of Libxml2 like 2.6.28 be used?

Thanks & Regds.,

Jaya Kumar

         

--Boundary_(ID_SGKwAFf1QokXWio59z+8Tw)-- From padovani@sti.uniurb.it Wed Jul 25 05:03:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gdome@gnome.org Delivered-To: gdome@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739C93B00BE for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:03:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Score: -2.444 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.444 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.4 (tstamp-), (distance 17, link: ethernet/modem), [193.205.2.135] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HVFscVWueZ8S for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:03:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from www.sti.uniurb.it (www.sti.uniurb.it [193.205.2.135]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413933B00A2 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:03:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from www.sti.uniurb.it by www.sti.uniurb.it via smtpd (for menubar.gnome.org [209.132.176.177]) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:03:50 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by raffaello.sti.uniurb.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE9F5EB8D; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:03:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cimabue.sti.uniurb.it (cimabue.sti.uniurb.it [192.168.1.211]) by raffaello.sti.uniurb.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0E45EB82; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:03:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.148] (unknown [192.168.1.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cimabue.sti.uniurb.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A6D272D9A; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:04:59 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <000001c7c9e6$d9b83e60$7d17120a@china.huawei.com> References: <000001c7c9e6$d9b83e60$7d17120a@china.huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Luca Padovani Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:03:31 +0200 To: Jaya Kumar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020222 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:23:58 -0400 Cc: gdome@gnome.org Subject: Re: [gdome] Query X-BeenThere: gdome@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnome DOM development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:03:54 -0000 On Jul 19, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Jaya Kumar wrote: > It is mentioned in the website =93http://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/=20 > make.html=94 that =96 > > Compiling gdome2 requires: > > =B7 libxml2 version 2.4.3 > > =B7 glib version 1.2.0 > > Can=92t advanced versions of Libxml2 like 2.6.28 be used? Daniel Veillard (the main developer of libxml) has always been =20 particularly concerned with backward compatibility. My guess is that =20 advanced versions of libxml can be used without problems. Cheers, --luca