2004-October Archive by Author

• Messages sorted by: [ Thread ] [ Date ] [ Author ]
• Other months

Carl Nygard

• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 22:45:18 GMT 2004

Christof Petig

• [glade--] Toolbar + ToolItem (gtkmm 2.4) fixed Thu Oct 07 14:42:33 GMT 2004
• [Fwd: RE: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?] Thu Oct 21 11:34:17 GMT 2004
• Re: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Thu Oct 21 11:19:09 GMT 2004
• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 08:55:17 GMT 2004
• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 07:54:00 GMT 2004
• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 09:39:19 GMT 2004
• Re: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Thu Oct 21 09:43:50 GMT 2004
• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 10:34:35 GMT 2004
• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 10:15:58 GMT 2004

Murray Cumming

• Re: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Thu Oct 21 07:50:09 GMT 2004
• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 09:44:40 GMT 2004
• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 08:59:51 GMT 2004
• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 10:20:40 GMT 2004

Paul Elliott

• [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 02:44:43 GMT 2004
• Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 22:22:11 GMT 2004
• Re: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated? Wed Oct 20 23:40:48 GMT 2004