Re: GAL vs gnome-2.0

From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
To: gnome-2-0-list gnome org
Subject: Re: GAL vs gnome-2.0
Date: 21 Sep 2001 10:35:00 -0700

> I guess to move gnome-vfs down to below gtk we would need to remove all
> the GNOME dependancies such as gconf (for proxy settings, etc) and oaf (for
> mime stuff). We should look at how to do this in the post-gnome-2 times.

We could split GnomeVFS into VFS and VFSUtils or something.

-Seth

References:
- Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001
  - From: Sander Vesik
- Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001
  - From: Bill Gribble
- Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001
  - From: Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001
  - From: Bill Gribble
- Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001
  - From: Havoc Pennington
- GAL vs gnome-2.0
  - From: Jody Goldberg
- Re: GAL vs gnome-2.0
  - From: Havoc Pennington
- Re: GAL vs gnome-2.0
  - From: Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: GAL vs gnome-2.0
  - From: Havoc Pennington
- Re: GAL vs gnome-2.0
  - From: Ian McKellar

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]