We're= in 2016 guys, why don't we move to a more modern and visual alternativ= e? I propose Gitlab as it's open source, we can install it in our serve= rs, it's robust and it has many good features as well as integrations.<= br>

Github is not a choice for me since it is not free software.

I get very frust= rated when I have to look for some patch, submit a bug or browse through th= e code using the current tools: bugzilla and git.gnome.org. Moving on we'll definitely brin= g more contributions and interest to GNOME and we would finally join the gi= t code repo with the bug tracking system.

I gue= ss somebody has already broached the subject before, but I do wanna di= scuss it and get real reasons of why we're not moving forward.

Greetings,

=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Akronix.

--001a114126d0520d12053f986ad7-- From rvzon84@gmail.com Mon Oct 24 09:54:45 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E00A763C1 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:54:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.749 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cx8Iagp8VKBZ for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5B1760A5 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f193so106877912wmg.0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:54:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t9Gb9lfxYXOaHpJituXNlWTMfXPN5tiLkMQ/7JFWyl0=; b=WBKnEvWDQfFgCiJQ8rqZxoqm/ebeeAOoH6u/naIrr8rOh7ngP7S9J+yvZW2f4GR8OR KAYco5lGvV1xICC63Ue+LlI7PFoZSjIv76Mxi1Jm/yB315D8r0XFP+OJuVmQ44RaYonp LHaF6sjCRTjOHUuTebm3mbEVNPfodKGfEHzTonNvUv0CRm94CjA0ycQSybgtBmds65iS vQRxhFsKgQxc3fW/wC5E7ux30Co5q8fe3e/3Lzy7rzXnKrD9ALxuPbvLSU0Pgqx04KLh NNpUaDKUcD3iAIeB7QiTC9AAeqNWUp3CpzSsL1KZ4e6qPjjzm0fin4MdmMHw488VBYx+ b2KA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t9Gb9lfxYXOaHpJituXNlWTMfXPN5tiLkMQ/7JFWyl0=; b=KYXLwySotmkQeXHs4I6ELAasiHotCUmFeovCUqKjR0PGZjdXusaYiN8Qm6aIbawT2Z Y2AkJZFdx3dVUM2wdGSFH2NOFncdbpxUrCgyrV5AwNlxemZtD4pTcwWnDWu9MHkSOZD/ kCocGGGnrlHKJZPZVu/9tp2igbUIYlTCYoEJ/wuWh6E0DE0aWm1QO0CtXby7CpLd7KfE 1MEvdFFxuN1zUo24oIABpOREGuqIAe5QN8OioJzOU8EwF7GNOzt5gwWy+ZppuGtCYuD9 swbrO+yI8v7tlU2wFJR0vVMIXUNKsj78HOyyEMR/GV1JDSBxNFogZZNKicw92HZMIHJ6 daLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnrOnZ/dHaCT3yxB5VuitjbUhShj4CpDEpHkaAXf97vLEjCbP+jr/bFhqWOArogCChLH5m6BDIo2fNKvg== X-Received: by 10.28.30.143 with SMTP id e137mr13504668wme.96.1477302881532; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:54:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.10.145 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:54:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Ronald van Zon Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:54:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Removing my account To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b21267ac104053f9961dc X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:31:47 +0000 X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:54:45 -0000 --001a114b21267ac104053f9961dc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have an account at https://extensions.gnome.org/ and I would like it to be removed. my username is Eagllus With kind regards, Eagllus --001a114b21267ac104053f9961dc Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have an account at https://extensions.gnome.org/ and= I would like it to be removed.

my username is Eagllus

With kind regards,

Eagllus

--001a114b21267ac104053f9961dc-- From muelli@cryptobitch.de Tue Oct 25 10:52:47 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D184376A7D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:52:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.273 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.273 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.373] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q9WsJXovrHag for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97937648C for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FB28A12E6E; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:52:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1477392760.27583.28.camel@cryptobitch.de> Subject: Re: Fwd: Let's move on our bug tracking system and git repository From: Tobias Mueller To: Abel Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:52:40 +0800 In-Reply-To: References:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:52:47 -0000 Hi. On Mo, 2016-10-24 at 10:44 +0200, Abel wrote: > I guess somebody has already broached the subject before, I don't remember any discussion, so your guess might be wrong ;-) > I get very frustrated when I have to look for some patch, submit a > bug or browse through the code using the current tools: bugzilla and > git.gnome.org. Can you elaborate? Or even better, talk to the products involved, i.e. Bugzilla and cgit (is it?)? > We're in 2016 guys, why don't we move to a more modern and visual alternative? I think the main reason is that someone would have to do it which has not been the case so far. It's a bit more complicated than that, though, because it also needs to be maintained, updated, and possibly integrated into the rest of the infrastructure. > I propose Gitlab as it's open source, we can install it in our servers, [...] How do you know that can install it? I think it's more complicated than downloading their omnibus thing and running it. For example, it needs to be updated every so often. Do they not do releases every month or so? I currently don't see how this would be possible to do on our end. > it's robust and it has many good features as well as integrations. I like Gitlab and I tend to install it for the projects I work on. But I would wait for more real world exposure until I'd call it "robust". See, Trac was the new kid a few years ago. Until it became not fashionable anymore and people started to like Redmine. Now it's something else entirely. While I understand that we ought to be open for modern tools, I also have the desire for keeping things stable. Especially given that the whole Web stuff is not our main expertise. In any case, if you want to make it happen, I guess you need to persuade the admins of it being a worthwhile investment of their time. You probably also want to get the buy-in of the main "customers" of the new programme which is probably best to get on d-d-l. Cheers, Tobi From jehan.marmottard@gmail.com Tue Oct 25 12:49:40 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D89876A7D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:49:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8tVLDW8AxjYm for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f170.google.com (mail-ua0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8191076A80 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f170.google.com with SMTP id t11so12827072uaa.5 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:49:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kLJ7QAOp/GvudEqegXdsxzaK8X9N92gD7ZYx//GdETM=; b=IL8EHfkfbV0EjJfLI5PknVpRRFkr70YYQfbhC3afFpMLQ88SWpyw/GGpbOQ9mPZAdE CLIMZaFyAghRp3NGtUAJrIuQl8KCzWTvBEOGt60bkKb9hTvM4ahqL+V7pmpgY7sJcryo SmKm5yZEHHIul6msR8pbB5hgJGPQDyprIp4AM4BrhCZqc36WA4sLvYksQESqO5VLnK7w kylen720BcuVPJ9FR5J+YvjmAoWTIUvwougm0RrCGczSxVIHkEIbc/+dI/33FvJJRxBd PIDH3ON6iGI4TkNvVGoV0bf4Nb1+VV9kg7A31bCgL2WJ4aRw5JSuUt2q1j5oEYfTYQ1J Yz0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kLJ7QAOp/GvudEqegXdsxzaK8X9N92gD7ZYx//GdETM=; b=TMecNwyJP8mTK+032vQT2Oa1eqqWWcCk9F30RKmmE3A4FSypZeFbjAziSJYey/rGva lCrZVWh9cMImZKxTVXb74f698W3RQERJNF/0hRbEqUTTB1auZdwALcmthlPhvk/P86wG Aqy+ReAgSoWEB0BeuK/Y4Rzx0FZ8h8iZyRMkqQU0A5VHBXog2wmrOX0rMD5eiL3eBg5l OWojrN98/0dCfkXdm11rS88ZYy537cgMF5VtbOtL1NqHftNz6XzXFXAI4jixoYE+9f1a A2XYT9cGGLt6Lp85wqx8cxotWqGPijpXql2BSUZfXcOv1h5J6UGGyqzMwpNRBk0PP8Dk n7TQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdXb8roy9ONFsm5+An6KjDmMpWYzsj6pX1bE54QuxFtXuBO/2gsU1DaC430t2OsIwt+IwFYTv8OPBlHpg== X-Received: by 10.176.7.33 with SMTP id h30mr12061307uah.114.1477399774109; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:49:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.49.24 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:49:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1477392760.27583.28.camel@cryptobitch.de> References:

<1477392760.27583.28.camel@cryptobitch.de> From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVoYW4gUGFnw6hz?= Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:49:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: Let's move on our bug tracking system and git repository To: Tobias Mueller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: GNOME Infrastructure , Abel X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:49:40 -0000 Hi, On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Tobias Mueller wr= ote: > Hi. > > On Mo, 2016-10-24 at 10:44 +0200, Abel wrote: >> I guess somebody has already broached the subject before, > I don't remember any discussion, so your guess might be wrong ;-) > >> I get very frustrated when I have to look for some patch, submit a >> bug or browse through the code using the current tools: bugzilla and >> git.gnome.org. > Can you elaborate? Or even better, talk to the products involved, i.e. > Bugzilla and cgit (is it?)? > > >> We're in 2016 guys, why don't we move to a more modern and visual altern= ative? > I think the main reason is that someone would have to do it which has > not been the case so far. > It's a bit more complicated than that, though, because it also needs to > be maintained, updated, and possibly integrated into the rest of the > infrastructure. > >> I propose Gitlab as it's open source, we can install it in our servers,= [...] > How do you know that can install it? I think it's more complicated > than downloading their omnibus thing and running it. > For example, it needs to be updated every so often. Do they not do > releases every month or so? I currently don't see how this would be > possible to do on our end. It also depends on how they maintain their releases. Do they have any long term releases with bug fixes? If they don't, they might agree to start doing this if a big project like GNOME wanted to install (though they are also a company so they might prefer to sell support). >> it's robust and it has many good features as well as integrations. > I like Gitlab and I tend to install it for the projects I work on. But > I would wait for more real world exposure until I'd call it "robust". > See, Trac was the new kid a few years ago. Until it became not > fashionable anymore and people started to like Redmine. Now it's > something else entirely. While I understand that we ought to be open > for modern tools, I also have the desire for keeping things stable. > Especially given that the whole Web stuff is not our main expertise. I have tried a bit gitlab on their main instance (gitlab.com) lately. My first concern is that I find it quite slow. Maybe their server is simply not adapted but that scares me a little. We'd need to make sure the software can handle the users of GNOME (not a small userbase!). Also does gitlab has all the features we need? Thing I can think of: you cannot move bug reports accross projects, which is a very common thing in GNOME and friends project (for instance someone opens a bug report in GIMP, we investigate, it turns out the bug is actually in some lib, and we move the bug report). Of course we can do without, by creating a new bug report for instance (which we do when the dependency project is not hosted by GNOME). But that kind of details may make some of the workflow maybe less straightforward. Well I'd get used to this particular change, but just saying=E2=80=A6 More annoying is that gitlab has a completely wrong idea of a git workflow (inspired by github) IMO. This whole forking business makes everything complicated. On github in particular, I hate that I can't simply upload a git-formatted patch. I have to make my own github repository ("fork"), customize my remotes on my local repo, push, then go "pull request" on the upstream. This is completely crazy. I mean, having my own public repo could make sense for a project where I am a huge contributor and also if I want to publicize my work before it is upstream. But really that's an edge case. This workflow for 1-time patches is terrible. Moreover public repositories should not change history all the time. But github/gitlab user (forked) repos are actually no more than private repos which are public for no reasons. So users create them, delete them, force-push them and so on, on a whim. This is a fucked-up and messy workflow. I see that gitlab at least does not prevent patch upload on the issue tracker (github does!), so the good point is that normal patch contribution is possible there. Still they are obviously encouraging the github-style fork-everything workflow and that's bad (IMO). And the uploaded patch does not benefit from any of the reviewing web UI! Clicking on a patch only proposes me to download it. We'd be at a clear functionality loss compared to bugzilla here. Now some people say that it makes the reviewer/maintainer life easier because they can merge directly from the web UI. Personally I am a little scared because I saw many github projects just merge all and everything this way without the maintainers even applying the patch on their local repository first. Ok some patches, I can understand (typo corrections and alike). But when it becomes more complicated, even if first a visual review can simply be done on the web UI (and all seems good there), I would usually still apply the patch and test it anyway. Since I do so, pushing the commit in the end is much easier than going back to my browser to click a button (which does prevent small amending of the commits too). So I feel that the github/gitlab way of making things said-to-be-easier for maintainers/reviewer is also encouraging a lesser job quality. Also having everyone fork every project means that GNOME will be responsible for hosting dozens of forks for a given project, maybe hundreds for projects with the most popularity (GIMP has 204 forks on the github mirror, as I write). Well disk space is cheap nowadays, but just saying it has to be taken into consideration. Of course, I guess we will have to block the ability to create new repositories from scratch (unless we want GNOME hosting to become a generic hosting, which I think, we don't). Now don't get me wrong. I appreciate some of github and gitlab features. Their code reviewing UI is much better than bugzilla's for one. Also having the bugtracker and the git web UI in a single place is practical (and most probably makes "how to contribute to project" easier). They have statistics and cool stuff. But I also see a lot of issues which should not be ignored and carefully weighted-in. I would personally appreciate a patched version of gitlab where we only keep what interests us. Basically that's a whole new project! :-/ > In any case, if you want to make it happen, I guess you need to > persuade the admins of it being a worthwhile investment of their time. Also it's not only installation. There is migration of the whole bugs (current and closed. We don't want to lose history) to be done, users, filters (do they even have bug filters in gitlab as powerful as in bugzilla?), etc.. And probably much more I don't see right now. > You probably also want to get the buy-in of the main "customers" of the > new programme which is probably best to get on d-d-l. > > Cheers, > Tobi > _______________________________________________ > gnome-infrastructure mailing list > gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure Jehan --=20 ZeMarmot open animation film http://film.zemarmot.net Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot From jehan.marmottard@gmail.com Tue Oct 25 16:06:08 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD6176A82 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:06:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L1saEOVLZ7CV for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f45.google.com (mail-vk0-f45.google.com [209.85.213.45]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 740B076A76 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id h85so12855764vkc.6 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=luP9yU7Uvu2NjVzf26fQya7u4W8pwDR672128kCOhcU=; b=WoDZA6nzIDMvbQ5bCg2n2QNZv+Mf/kwDGyf6Tyvu78iLNtHTXeSdHxHzZOam8Dqcdj 799ZecyaVRpxgRU6J2+3riIR0ORVMSAktfDboYA+FheKc8ZGLFZcoc/BJdhlmCHEEk7+ /mGQg+/WJsqrURkNFIKm907xjdl/n9SN39R5aQdmr3cewonuClLKWUotybI+HNE20mov wy7mP/Xf0e8wA3pYMal+/dHopD+R22mDfKWeE4nxsfFkEcXXyYVipe2xPjgSpbCEzQHm xNgX+X3gQpp9FCuKIgcKZYdfoGNcNmcS1Yl05jBarbC1iFMpNr++Uj5joiiXgdtCYw8T ATVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=luP9yU7Uvu2NjVzf26fQya7u4W8pwDR672128kCOhcU=; b=OXCq4FIltWJJ+cK78lurfgGhTB+yhXzQnMsIK/A3PYcwj3P9wXV8bYdoAAGyh/DuZC 69kql6irzijNqvzKn/M9FeiO16Pf4s1oFjyRKF9KfQMEi8EchjJai8s8ni/ylb9N6mnu e+ZiE10xbqlmpGWPVwdqIeiGeHgyHKqAzPqGotZYY5YeGbuI/1DrC5cMD4Dwql2TyVok z0HIgQzrSnQzZsXm4HggsMXEbaXb2gjfAbjKHUh+cID9nEnd+FyecBxW2Aza4mGSKM3f 3Y2ByialS1gOdLeM+cEbYYknicgMUsz4By6zfiLTwmhwx5cKiJgTEw4s01/6lJ6RCxM5 FATw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfVC0HDKfWuFWVWsnTi+bRu6wTKuTNsoLvaDhyFQHSAXRSxREBJRPUv/otuAJMEF+QglRPnc20jVnX8kw== X-Received: by 10.31.174.147 with SMTP id x141mr7441734vke.73.1477411560895; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.49.24 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:05:39 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVoYW4gUGFnw6hz?= Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:05:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Who can close GIMP pull requests on github? To: GNOME Infrastructure Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:06:08 -0000 Hello! I have asked this on the desktop-devel-list@ mailing list months ago, but never got any answers so I try again on this list. Please if this is not considered "infrastructure" hence is again the wrong list, tell me where I should ask. Who has the power over GNOME's github mirrors? Could anyone close these: https://github.com/gnome/gimp/pulls All these "pull requests" are either obsolete, or taken care of, or the reporter moved one's requests to bugzilla so they are all good for closing. Also could it be possible to forbid new pull requests and redirect people to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=GIMP instead? Does github provide this kind of feature? Thanks. Jehan -- ZeMarmot open animation film http://film.zemarmot.net Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot From jehan.marmottard@gmail.com Tue Oct 25 16:25:59 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8C476A87 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:25:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hv7DlnN4gbGr for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f177.google.com (mail-ua0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3749276A82 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f177.google.com with SMTP id h7so282016uab.5 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:25:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IjCJ9d7QndGaFAWYNmfvOj3IXhzqseWo7vLAC3Zft2g=; b=kU1mBbLnxoputjT6mPN4FCxeyX84BHNv2UNiX31Ub2ENqteQ3h3KvDU/XQXr09pPeK 9AqIh12Yp145FaYEHTJXkGbZ0dowUSnr8WwTaWT558pHVJYeJDffpLPxGQsHyYVtI9lD GnZ3xV9KGl77rlY9Vb8omA7cfrNiCctAnQ9HO/nVy8YFYtv/95d4S52//5dHTSjkrJDE iE9HONAPYx1XPlnVStLbb9+tcdyWMpDdevh8dU/m2OLQvwnB1HVLYkGdCz1JlszL+wzx 15s2wJxTmYr6vtbFhIhthWzsAm7dg2whkkVM9fvxoegE1fbniKwqXV9vKAy5YVd61z+U 3O9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IjCJ9d7QndGaFAWYNmfvOj3IXhzqseWo7vLAC3Zft2g=; b=dd5GaFfycCYrp/ys0tp9b8G6Io74MckZMY5fKXT7/a+dZtDeyYvXB3SGG8ksQZoPEg mm0jnsCvAqlR1FiMJvgcLTUzg2rj7f7/5fOAqCfAOViInk+okCwxs14OjU2IgQtt5jql oZKftdswoDXjftfrBrkiWA53oyppmOjj/ftS4sxqsCNKD8w79iNTlryNs1iEKbZeWqOd Tl02X7gTlhtq9c/ydIUWSVnKW1BWFb9KEOCkTHNGltusAI2LL6dUGEyDmrLcfVwus2q8 2yxxY+Y5DIU7eQJqbjKmVD+4UQWNre7kdasaL0kb9PaMIt11uucK/xtZrlxZAaE5eZjq 8Tuw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfNDbaEaDghzgGvLE+b/U9pgK1jUI8Pg8p8upYpt89/0fmu4bgOgZIC4rGLsInLmHScodB6TBZbhQXoPA== X-Received: by 10.159.35.68 with SMTP id 62mr14775411uae.4.1477412755893; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:25:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.49.24 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:25:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References:

<1477392760.27583.28.camel@cryptobitch.de> From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVoYW4gUGFnw6hz?= Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:25:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: Let's move on our bug tracking system and git repository To: Abel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: GNOME Infrastructure X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:25:59 -0000 Hi again! On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Abel wrote: > Hi. > > At this point, I think I should enumerate mi personal frustrations with > bugzilla, as a very occasional contributor: > > It's slow and tedious to search for bugs by products. I'd be easy if every > product had it's own folder or something like I could go to > bugzilla.gnome.org/shotwell/buglist.cgy?quicksearch="something" Agreed. > There's no online preview of patches. What? Maybe that's why you don't like bugzilla, if you don't know its features. :P No idea how you miss this one though, since the *default* view (clicking a patch from the message, giving a diff side-by-side view with colors) of patches is an online preview! Now don't get me wrong: gitlab and github have a nicer preview, and much better review GUI (commenting individual lines of code, etc.). But saying that bugzilla has none is not true. > The web site don't support diff between commits and branches. cgit can show commit diffs and this is integrated in bugzilla (when you write a commit hash in bugzilla, it links there directly). Now maybe this diff has less features (I don't think you can diff against any random branch, only against its own parent). > Interface is ugly and not intuitive. There's too much information and A matter of taste, but bugzilla is old-school, yes. This said, as Tobias said earlier, trend change fast on the web. What is a cool web 2.0 (or 3.0 or whatever!) GUI now may not be in a year. This can still be a good reason. Appearing cool and fashionable is not bad. But this should not be the principal reason for change (when this change is deep and changes also the workflow at its core like here. Of course, if it just gets a shiny new UI, this can be a very good reason for change). > content in the bug page that standard contributors don't care about. There's > no colors to clearer show tags, status, milestones, etc. Well bugzilla has all these and that's all very clear to me, just not in a cool fashionable UI. > Not support for markdown or flavoured text. There is actually some syntax support, but not as good as it could be. > There's a big barrier for newcomer contributors. I don't find easy and clear > the workflow to submit a patch and get it added to trunk. Many people > haven't ever used bugzilla and the interface don't help too much to get them > quickly started. I remember that someone (phisically) taught me how to get > to it. Well that's where we disagree. The workflow is 1000x better on bugzilla IMO. Now a lot of newer developers use github (once again because it is the trend and because you hear stupid stuff as the fact that a developer *must* have a github account as a public portfolio). So they are used to this and think that this is how all workflows are supposed to be. Well as I said, the github workflow is terrible. Trying to reproduce this just because some developers don't know better is a race to the bottom. And I certainly don't want this. Our tools and workflows are far from perfect either (even crappy in a lot of places) and I am all in favor of improving them. But in the right direction. In the end, this is all about the fact that some people are used to something (and we to another). And I believe that even though some parts of their tools are definitely an improvement, some others are terrible. > New features and integrations that bugzilla doesn't seem to ever have. For > instance: webhooks, mobile clients,... think of all the third party services > have integration with github, gitlab and so. Bugzilla has an API, and therefore desktop clients, but also mobile clients (never thought about this since I don't see the point of editing bugzilla with my phone. But I just searched and found at least 5 mobile clients!). The best "clients" though are not GUI, but direct git integration for instance with the git-bz tool. I don't think Bugzilla has webhooks by default, but if we wanted to give some users (maintainers of a project) such an ability, that feature should be quite straightforward to code as a plugin. Most things are much better done with git hooks (rather than plugging with the bug tracker). > Separated git codebase from bug system, and from any other things that > concerns to gnome contributors (docs, bugzilla user, etc.) All in one tools are good and bad in the same time. It makes us quite dependent and is a problem when we want to use another tool (like should we use the integrated gitlab wiki instead of the current one? Do we really want to concentrate every usage into this single tool even if features are missing compared to separate tools?). > And I think that more can be adding by people with more experience > developing in GNOME. People with experience all have a lot more experience using various tools (be it bugzilla and other bug trackers) and have no problems switching from a tool to another. > I see that more and more open source development is happening on github and > people are more actively contributing. On the other hand, people get scared > when they want to collaborate with other open source projects like GNOME and > they see this git + bugzilla + patches system that they don't understand at > all. If not, why are there github mirrors for many gnome products and people > get and participate to them before to go to bugzilla? I've even heard that a > gnome maintainer requested that patches must be uploaded as a Pull Request > to the github mirror. Personally I'd prefer these mirrors gone. We have no power on them anyway so they are quite useless to us anyway. > It doesn't have to be gitlab, but I'd rather look for something visually > better, specially for people to easy get involved and improve GNOME. I've > heard good words of phabricator, for example. I think the real problem is what you point at: yes bugzilla is an old tool, not that visually-appealing. This is to be taken into consideration but not at a feature-loss and workflow-loss. > Ok, yes, I recognize that it requires some effort to move to something > different, specially to move bugs and bind integrations. But we have to > assume that some effort will have to be putted into this at some point or > we're gonna be stuck on bugzilla until the end of the days? I'm all for moving forward to something modern and appealing! I'd just prefer it is not a github clone. At least not on the particular parts which makes the workflow (all the fork crap). Better code viewing and reviewing, and all this stuff, yes, 100x times. Forks and pull requests for every contribution? No! This said, I likely won't be the one to make the migration work, so I am only giving an opinion here and will have to agree with whoever does the actual work here. I would accept to work with a gitlab UI of course and that would not stop me from contributing. I still want to say that I would not like it. :P Anyway sorry for the noise. Jehan > Because I feel If we want that GNOME would be a more participative and > active project, we have to ever change this. And if so, the sooner we do it, > the better. > > Greetings, > > Akronix. -- ZeMarmot open animation film http://film.zemarmot.net Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot From ak-47@gmx.net Tue Oct 25 16:49:32 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925D276A88 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:49:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.723 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.723 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.373, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLmsm_VNMrjQ for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0051F76A87 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from canis.lupus ([89.177.56.113]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MaIw0-1cEXOw38HY-00JntM for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:49:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1477414165.22796.6.camel@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Fwd: Let's move on our bug tracking system and git repository From: Andre Klapper To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:49:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: References:

<1477392760.27583.28.camel@cryptobitch.de>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pnGF3Y6XC7fXKYoYFB0+2xKC4uvYauZheuz8WHgkzrQm2crBSie uekr9s2AYJqj0rlHKQoM4NeZpkW1wlhbePcEhfYX+I5HDtjpc9Gj4WpSnu2cr0O/SnDEuq6 maIjpSb+1oCSRwRH/l/ZWFZ0Lx68B7tevpdv68v1o9pIQL1McAO/lmTrmWMVMLwQd3Cghom r3kYmwPHr1G6/s1bZzEIw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2D7kGqS/jdA=:ChY/f0J09V15d/piNf0/UI FdGNnEUHpYskcbDnB321WhS7rrmX2W303vTZdCkOwnXyL2l4Z2N+J8CJoRYn6aXERnn5pOSs2 ZXkKvpuu1ORRvTIchWtWKJyKMByYwwxzoPIUx7QdLrt2eYDCt74AaZWO/hYDrkTZzsYJjePLq ogSnvxhzOyYx4hSWHpUk56a7ipHdqNAVh/J0ZEAo8KsO6jsWyFFL4VDQwVX8xgl93xMm5P3VS mEvc1TCxIwc8nBIQDH6o4ceksTgrscIePbgdJi1HYq++hqDf39K8GPV3ztrEsI0EJ1OT/BZGC iG/JoOXUNPNCQ5/ZHEYZzwUd5+DyfpQchD7J5NdFZ/bKQLwG+L3rzA69pF5KPQIcoTrZiBDbD adP11PF038Vmfc8tleWARvgsrX+wAYB/p3EmfEvWIhnJlgx1LQ/hrNtGufQk9lNaKGByfSFyW aPzfFujmggl8z83PqcfY39ZCXzheaoP/AUR0BWTe0Z94FNLTZTtGlE63ZQqaBs0DS9aPgF58l 6e4/psMpsdf4Bxx6FH9IwRhzhFx4JThmdu7oZ8mIVjPDpktfK5sEhlDHnxOcQ8KlR/zIVrTGz 4eJzRW0p5HU8mGcdKYoJK2DOdjRm2fye3e2k2vcZavYkjNpxfsvQLE0JQjVSPVAlte/2Hd3pl 4/iH11//mFuyQCNbLJoXVFe6sEb5+nKPXg/I/jagiljr/V5UsVQr2e/dEi1539JSOHR1tol4D 58zUgTb7b330pIRwHEuh04zwCRVk+IGs0AcLxstDXBXQg0CMYe0p9gJUGzNMewRKSDzKAulKg cr7dX3q X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:49:32 -0000 On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 18:25 +0200, Jehan Pag=C3=A8s wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Abel wrote: > > It's slow and tedious to search for bugs by products. I'd be easy > > if every > > product had it's own folder or something like I could go to > > bugzilla.gnome.org/shotwell/buglist.cgy?quicksearch=3D"something" That's exactly what the big search field on the product page does: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=3Dbrowse.html&product=3Dshotwell > > The web site don't support diff between commits and branches. >=20 > cgit can show commit diffs and this is integrated in bugzilla (when > you write a commit hash in bugzilla, it links there directly). Now > maybe this diff has less features (I don't think you can diff against > any random branch, only against its own parent). For the records, it's a custom hack that you automatically get links to cgit in Bugzilla comments if the Bugzilla product name in the Bugzilla ticket matches the Git code repository name. > > Not support for markdown or flavoured text. IIRC Bugzilla 6 will support markdown.=C2=A0 Just saying; and not saying we'd migrate to Bugzilla 6 anytime soon. > > New features and integrations that bugzilla doesn't seem to ever have. = For > > instance: webhooks, mobile clients,... think of all the third party ser= vices > > have integration with github, gitlab and so. I'd be interested in specific use cases ("I want to achieve X") instead of technologies.=C2=A0 In my opinion Bugzilla's problem already *is* feature creep. :) Cheers, andre --=20 Andre Klapper | ak-47@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ From akronix5@gmail.com Tue Oct 25 14:09:59 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F28A76A80 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:09:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.449 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jO78TXQM1QTb for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E70676A76 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id b81so204341920lfe.1 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:09:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Xfuwo4qec8BJKrM0fpa/cGipuBf1PzlHww7rT7Kq2Eo=; b=q/XZuBHaUPvmCbwafP8D9XFa/+EmR9JzG+NQWx5vYRYrgo0ngMGrv4IPEP8sTHNvWO WQIuIp6RGPcIxBEOV0C4G7OXCuAyIhIiA3RBlFLTuARiDrAkitk6EpswPZkeNmXJvJ60 EyzD9XZ6YxpA2JSPLifHYjTaIuZ31kxV9HCWNlM/h2v6EiK/LzVFjmw41nO5Nnpo12uj lWu08KnPUTOtexGtezJXqg+4vToLOnz/vq7MpG7buMMRfIcVRLKRtt1I7GDYpUqlYb1Z eRxfscbN4aYCFtwSO54mDObesKUbv5Z5+8jsOtccs9HHuhhaTbtazCTSgTU9cGYGAGqL HWug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Xfuwo4qec8BJKrM0fpa/cGipuBf1PzlHww7rT7Kq2Eo=; b=Ttuh7Ai5B5xNSENvP6K6XPf1RD8PRrfqOqe0JGuqtyPiYrujEJRgmuKd3epQyK5KO4 o09l3zewub8NplBc1bEFha7ic505IqFBrJEvb+1395NrbMwFhYas4OEd5pKnkz/0g83e BjSXDy14zqk1YwVMi4pcevQYB537qzgbiPy9lkeEpOcp+uQSsUl4WcPyNOKh+yEixUiC p65E2EZBhF5srA0LA4pKEVh6my489QueuJqm+ko3Y4YKxbT7aMOpCGFTlCiOn4yd+0+A 8nFULyAzagQEthi3BsolrLehEUnWMvb0E9xztD8rcLoL68akYCPpCmWHpR2xK4AuSTSf CcaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvf0Fs6EWk+DFnSzVmFkXqBULl74N3QcfZziOEFYugdUx+/j39kiXHpU3SpZIGauCeQxEoWEj/bXeOFpEw== X-Received: by 10.25.77.197 with SMTP id a188mr10441689lfb.55.1477404591598; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:09:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.22.67 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:09:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References:

<1477392760.27583.28.camel@cryptobitch.de> From: Abel Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:09:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: Let's move on our bug tracking system and git repository To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVoYW4gUGFnw6hz?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141e34cdf3236053fb10f88 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:31:50 +0000 Cc: GNOME Infrastructure X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:09:59 -0000 --001a1141e34cdf3236053fb10f88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi. At this point, I think I should enumerate mi personal frustrations with bugzilla, as a very occasional contributor: - It's slow and tedious to search for bugs by products. I'd be easy if every product had it's own folder or something like I could go to bugzilla.gnome.org/shotwell/buglist.cgy?quicksearch="something" - There's no online preview of patches. - The web site don't support diff between commits and branches. - Interface is ugly and not intuitive. There's too much information and content in the bug page that standard contributors don't care about. There's no colors to clearer show tags, status, milestones, etc. - Not support for markdown or flavoured text. - There's a big barrier for newcomer contributors. I don't find easy and clear the workflow to submit a patch and get it added to trunk. Many people haven't ever used bugzilla and the interface don't help too much to get them quickly started. I remember that someone (phisically) taught me how to get to it. - New features and integrations that bugzilla doesn't seem to ever have. For instance: webhooks, mobile clients,... think of all the third party services have integration with github, gitlab and so. - Separated git codebase from bug system, and from any other things that concerns to gnome contributors (docs, bugzilla user, etc.) And I think that more can be adding by people with more experience developing in GNOME. I see that more and more open source development is happening on github and people are more actively contributing. On the other hand, people get scared when they want to collaborate with other open source projects like GNOME and they see this git + bugzilla + patches system that they don't understand at all. If not, why are there github mirrors for many gnome products and people get and participate to them before to go to bugzilla? I've even heard that a gnome maintainer requested that patches must be uploaded as a Pull Request to the github mirror. It doesn't have to be gitlab, but I'd rather look for something visually better, specially for people to easy get involved and improve GNOME. I've heard good words of phabricator , for example. Ok, yes, I recognize that it requires some effort to move to something different, specially to move bugs and bind integrations. But we have to assume that some effort will have to be putted into this at some point or we're gonna be stuck on bugzilla until the end of the days? Because I feel If we want that GNOME would be a more participative and active project, we have to ever change this. And if so, the sooner we do it, the better. *Greetings,* *Akronix.* --001a1141e34cdf3236053fb10f88 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi.

At this point, I think I should enum= erate mi personal frustrations with bugzilla, as a very occasional contribu= tor:

It's slow and tedious to search for bugs by products. I= 'd be easy if every product had it's own folder or something like I= could go to bugzilla.gnome.= org/shotwell/buglist.cgy?quicksearch=3D"something"
There's no = online preview of patches.
The web site don't support diff between commits a= nd branches.
Interface is ugly and not intuitive. There's too much infor= mation and content in the bug page that standard contributors don't car= e about. There's no colors to clearer show tags, status, milestones, et= c.
Not support for markdown or flavoured text.
There's = a big barrier for newcomer contributors. I don't find easy and clear th= e workflow to submit a patch and get it added to trunk. Many people haven&#= 39;t ever used bugzilla and the interface don't help too much to get th= em quickly started. I remember that someone (phisically) taught me how to g= et to it.
New features and integrations that bugzilla doesn't s= eem to ever have. For instance: webhooks, mobile clients,... think of all t= he third party services have integration with github, gitlab and so.

Separated git codebase from bug system, and from any other things that co= ncerns to gnome contributors (docs, bugzilla user, etc.)

An= d I think that more can be adding by people with more experience developing= in GNOME.

I see that more and more open source development is ha= ppening on github and people are more actively contributing. On the other h= and, people get scared when they want to collaborate with other open source= projects like GNOME and they see this git + bugzilla + patches system that= they don't understand at all. If not, why are there github mirrors fo= r many gnome products and people get and participate to them before to go t= o bugzilla? I've even heard that a gnome maintainer requested that patc= hes must be uploaded as a Pull Request to the github mirror.

It doesn= 't have to be gitlab, but I'd rather look for something visually be= tter, specially for people to easy get involved and improve GNOME. I've= heard good words of phabricator= , for example.

Ok, yes, I recognize that it requires some effort to m= ove to something different, specially to move bugs and bind integrations. B= ut we have to assume that some effort will have to be putted into this at s= ome point or we're gonna be stuck on bugzilla until the end of the days= ?

Because I feel If we want that GNOME would be a more participat= ive and active project, we have to ever change this. And if so, the sooner= we do it, the better.

Greetings,

Akronix.

--001a1141e34cdf3236053fb10f88-- From ml@update.uu.se Tue Oct 25 21:21:09 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFAF76AC3; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:21:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jei7zjwVrybZ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:21:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 477 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at restaurant.gnome.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:21:07 UTC Received: from mail.primekey.se (mail.primekey.se [213.115.30.164]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F20076AC2; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.primekey.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.primekey.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DE945C0097; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:13:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gemini (c-9c3d72d5.014-990-7570702.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.114.61.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.primekey.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93E5F45C0095; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:13:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1477429984.5460.29.camel@update.uu.se> Subject: Infrastructure for public transportation routing in Maps From: Marcus Lundblad To: foundation-list@gnome.org, maps-list@gnome.org, gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:13:04 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:31:51 +0000 X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: ml@update.uu.se List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:21:09 -0000 Hi! As you probably have already seen, following my blog posts on Planet GNOME, I have been working on an implementation augmenting the routing support in Maps to include public transportation (transit) as an option. This will need some infrastructure for running OpenTripPlanner (the server-side software I have found suitable for the task). Currently in the WIP branch it's hard-coded to run against a server running on localhost, which is ofcourse needs to be change for this to work, and is also an impediment for getting more testing done. I'd really like to be able to land this for 3.24! The hardware requirements are quite high when it comes to RAM (the more the better essentially, but I guess we could start in a smaller scale if needed). I have have put together some information on the project here: https:// wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Maps/PublicTransportation So, I'm reaching out for a bit of assistance if someone happens to have some great ideas about possible sponsoring or doing i.e. a croud founding effort. I'd be willing to spend some amount my self to get this up to speed. Cheers and out! //Marcus From rishi.is@lostca.se Thu Oct 27 13:15:02 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F359764BC for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:15:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.374 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.374 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.373, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f2TW1udhOiqH for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aloka.lostca.se (aloka.lostca.se [178.63.46.202]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2A276BFC for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aloka.lostca.se (aloka [127.0.0.1]) by aloka.lostca.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A5345D; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:14:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=lostca.se; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=howrah; bh=AX5J0b3smaC+bde/l1oBJ+gkv2Y=; b=T4OpB PDlJ6WL8aSHuIKB0Q3pg1sA6rkp6eqX3ilktNIRKNQjduOGYzNaAhOb++TKfKSgo kYtUoWzOoayDPxVzMm1ajFQclBzYiE/XC6MoBpDl0d1q5LWx12RZAmVERujurwb/ xUY0Mf0qjgcZ7cT2rqbYoSBrsvoqBM3W9N4z7M= Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:120:624c::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aloka.lostca.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E671D45C; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:14:54 +0000 From: Debarshi Ray To: Jehan Pag?s Subject: Re: Who can close GIMP pull requests on github? Message-ID: <20161027131454.GD87658@aloka.lostca.se> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Yia77v5a8fyVHJSl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: GNOME Infrastructure X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:15:02 -0000 --Yia77v5a8fyVHJSl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hey, On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 06:05:39PM +0200, Jehan Pag?s wrote: > Also could it be possible to forbid new pull requests and redirect > people to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=GIMP > instead? Does github provide this kind of feature? As far as I know from past discussions, it is not possible to disable new pull requests from being created. Cheers, Rishi --Yia77v5a8fyVHJSl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYEf3OAAoJEEMnBfrN1AMlmCYQAKMJo7TiDiCQAHwyUaoV2TBP 1NQzMB5l998/PHC8YLh2nBiuVCPXhSlJOsNLMfZWChATSAVletRT0uHVAZLNZ2oB hDqUbbef3RZKaAwDTlI92cMVulWXW5on0y7w2h4ZQ/hpVDCL1QFnNJy8GZDmfiVJ tqMf17sZ4nlefDO/hu4lQv9BbhKSK02husWcUSL9Hegawln6WS9PwPYIikKMPCtd Q1TwJl4CMm5qm8lXLuIRgpz3quwYMMWz1+3/RivOMv04hjFmVh8THScbsK2rBLSn 0theT62rZKavlI6iRWVaDGpHJdFUNBnyvEMkVo/7u8+zIegdJ01WSHdD8yBqPmQK uePNWknfdLdycpGVanMbdYWnTQ9iVfW+jEsk0cvvovjLYGRj7hyYOflxTLo/QuTr 2C3BgM5FLXxmP931aCvVzdUxy11LUR9IpCuTOYpYfw0CUqCd8B/rCLKcA4p8oOmy iVe0wiZrpz1NI7I0z/o8rN1RQuei7Ug2wfZwkqYUeYzWS4kOJ42ayfhKRwNtfugh +miPFQDvdse2h455g+YiYEX+L6riDGWYsyP/JeXL03+MG26wOvonzV7Oagta1dIP uRLn75kU7CB2Gp0GwkdaZRCsHJsxRfov6tWPEfkFUHKy9TnfHMLrOR7VVmnIL3H3 TRwHnWgTiHiT6bgb8gdJ =sGXq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Yia77v5a8fyVHJSl-- From jehan.marmottard@gmail.com Thu Oct 27 13:24:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C4B7659F for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:24:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PUxDtoz8Keny for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f170.google.com (mail-ua0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71039764BC for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 64so22323380uap.3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:24:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ih0Jy1zwKALoGfH6VrWg3MHL95bUnid8Pcqk7I0CwhQ=; b=JXJr1YPmQw7Uqr05qnm+0cICbxbQ33s3y7qURVQsRRwxGryzhzZKq67ypA8QResfTV xXobfuAtptgPA2SIR2hvRchvCwa+646fHjqxCO+/YomQ8F4yhc4C4hm44OW6x85p8BBy JzTXddaiUjMZus4yazj1kniISfhCte+t0ElCx/9tHlO/hWAcmIM7NYWxCIzATv1WOuC0 TGCEbY0Hi03FFdRZdNQllP2dwunRceB/9lDYWDcu49ggrwiBw58gm5PhsF4UUykUwAf9 udrQ2hCOtElhj1n6fCycc2JlOXSwGCfCPUDjZWGxA2nxYVUymvOpOCDJ13pSMNnjNrFj M4Rg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ih0Jy1zwKALoGfH6VrWg3MHL95bUnid8Pcqk7I0CwhQ=; b=IhRafP3GuQpsj+ipQ7ugpgzc0dJVN35RJ4j/W/XPHUA8v4d6sI5Gz54V9E8Tr9YXEk 3ojBbKWfD8gIvDGKV8d5eGdllMKX/2lW0k/G4YE7ZkM40gJE4uGbNrdxRx9PX/HWMLaY Om54PABxEMuzQWA0RhfzDgiedkV+cOVtspGcPxKAwfUeHP+LNv9aIZirY4m78eQAOPx4 ZKGQbxNQvgtBD1lqIugawNGXSViPRgvhAddJwFozLMwOrK2K5ftUUQMq24n/vvxlkYzm inSNWG6bZiQYBtDIhd7+qXbZMZzOZiEG/kBSUB4+NHdglOzim23K75tGBLKijsYXRJvW 4FAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdZOVwtDt4uAo2yI8KfEUN7g1QL6LRtRNVwHESLirNyYiCeWkl3hRj9V4fdTwMaMElPiukJsZ5T8fVNSw== X-Received: by 10.176.69.99 with SMTP id r90mr5733120uar.161.1477574648183; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:24:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:23:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20161027131454.GD87658@aloka.lostca.se> References: <20161027131454.GD87658@aloka.lostca.se> From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVoYW4gUGFnw6hz?= Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:23:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Who can close GIMP pull requests on github? To: Debarshi Ray Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: GNOME Infrastructure X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:24:14 -0000 Hi, On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote: > Hey, > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 06:05:39PM +0200, Jehan Pag?s wrote: >> Also could it be possible to forbid new pull requests and redirect >> people to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=GIMP >> instead? Does github provide this kind of feature? > > As far as I know from past discussions, it is not possible to disable > new pull requests from being created. Thanks for the info. Could there be at least some admin of the github GNOME project who could close the current ones then? If the mirror is totally unmaintained, the result is worse than having no github presence IMO. I can understand why some people wanted a mirror on github (though I don't necessarily agree). Yet personally I'd prefer no mirror than unmaintained mirrors (only speaking from personal view, not in the name of the GIMP project!). :-/ Jehan > Cheers, > Rishi -- ZeMarmot open animation film http://film.zemarmot.net Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot From andrea.veri@gmail.com Fri Oct 28 09:18:51 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FB276BEA for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:18:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Su2N5Z4X2cVk for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f54.google.com (mail-lf0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5744C768F3 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f54.google.com with SMTP id x79so52018790lff.0 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:18:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+pRZlza6J7q1MDWjkAjT6pzaTsyGoeyNvaHxr4M7Bw0=; b=fuvWvtiAkzqeCMxTbaEKAj5lsoRHtcmUBvTYsZJ4wjo6ZE5/WF7+Fnc+LtInmwKnYX zQzzVKzeKxkaoLe9qlhtchJqZALxSpyEAzIaQnDlwj8pJaP2v/i+lkkptdhW0Kg/hIj7 r/4OiudTiL6vwSMHv//rMwcB8OKqpkO/rqgqWKZDf7qEfzrDk8uznA2Elc9LFjcyq5Se FTE++NG/Mhls6WN+EPs1HD3LTUnZtWZB5d5z4uva4rut/7ftiOlU7iVjStpc6oSyC3YM Cq04o9i7On4DQA8t18DioGGsm7G/1go/NGRTMQDfdljzxpimhVX6ZeNDz5k5xC7Dv9JK H1RA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+pRZlza6J7q1MDWjkAjT6pzaTsyGoeyNvaHxr4M7Bw0=; b=QzN+lHahktLSO95OUDzVq8dxpv+VZrE211w14frJkIbnvZMHm0PsQ0iV5foGfBNRPh tjRzSQibcjZ+5m2bJzdYEyLwzYJ/BpwMi3U2l0IDi7IdTGZQD4HCwqYRQmDtJV1elP5l MpmV4jJd6/zmM9CGVuDr/+40+8a16cpf4+etqUmp4BRSWXvz3G1hD6DBN/S4LVvM7C3r YVkvcbMapF3adPsx4PUI1XJMKTiL64RgDPcDIKcyf7lj81VCwDEm6nT/TsxgWz0ZycxV OC1iFpzphoMYL785VzoEGIa/NSkNQgkxScGZPIfTgKuYPr1zq3qtswjDIru2dDZgsUX9 JX5g== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvf4QUVp2yETnUDVkt5mczXZ6vFrZGwZhnQTW9PkXszHnRABVF3jtZyBHxwnwweXjsS6WzLUk4AEjovKnw== X-Received: by 10.25.193.198 with SMTP id r189mr8682406lff.21.1477646327299; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:18:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: andrea.veri@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.174.205 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:18:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrea Veri Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:18:46 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7vf8EURsmNDkYOaiJhJVigndOvo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Who can close GIMP pull requests on github? To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVoYW4gUGFnw6hz?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: GNOME Infrastructure X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:18:51 -0000 Hey, please provide me your github username so I can include you on the GIMP repository as a collaborator. About closing pull requests automatically we are looking into using an automated script that should close the issue and forward the user to Bugzilla. [1] cheers, [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D748078 2016-10-25 18:05 GMT+02:00 Jehan Pag=C3=A8s : > Hello! > > I have asked this on the desktop-devel-list@ mailing list months ago, > but never got any answers so I try again on this list. Please if this > is not considered "infrastructure" hence is again the wrong list, tell > me where I should ask. > > Who has the power over GNOME's github mirrors? > Could anyone close these: https://github.com/gnome/gimp/pulls > > All these "pull requests" are either obsolete, or taken care of, or > the reporter moved one's requests to bugzilla so they are all good for > closing. > > Also could it be possible to forbid new pull requests and redirect > people to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=3DGIMP > instead? Does github provide this kind of feature? > Thanks. > > Jehan > > -- > ZeMarmot open animation film > http://film.zemarmot.net > Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot > Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot > _______________________________________________ > gnome-infrastructure mailing list > gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure --=20 Cheers, Andrea Debian Developer, Fedora / EPEL packager, GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator, GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary, GNOME Foundation Membership & Elections Committee Chairman Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~av From andrea.veri@gmail.com Fri Oct 28 10:36:47 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A037765BC for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:36:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWIzh1kZcoMP for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com (mail-lf0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80B0176A91 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x79so53453291lff.0 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 03:36:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=cQZpw9bJvr0J8cIWCdrmjHvJLg6kcliJ8IjUunsnmy4=; b=MZe1gt0/i4Dipf2cQ6KAz0BpafcDK91LkjIGFijh2f5Db/CUBQoMym5cTkY8k5f5jA VFZvko16+H1xZO/YehAmtPlg5BNScnXIersRvY6ERj4eVXMmmUFXEfi+vRvGEN/fusiI UHz9NbgyEu20jfEeGVW7GROZ2jJKEqJZ8g07vxlKG19AJAOAZeJEm8nBcOKOHW/29vWo jN70+BsY0lk++uRqen9BrzOJ5L0PS65Kesy/4NCLuOgJAzNIYt+TpN/cvaYjS7qM5+WB n4ur+lGbj+Lo0/YJLHFzs45hzPIe2oO0aa843+bTKE0aIDSRS/MquFQDb56H5PcAq9fg Rjvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cQZpw9bJvr0J8cIWCdrmjHvJLg6kcliJ8IjUunsnmy4=; b=I2/ot1WqbbcfAg5MyGmip1i01FWhVSAyJ8QVEufcMJEiBBtIvYzdAdevkm9TV4Kssu QTAYrqSP8OTOfiPi3mt6Mch2Hmj3AtM0/0pzUeen9Rhwl3ALloI+zPwCSYczK478WEuQ giZHQ5Hljl6GzqwIKBVR+VQl9QVqJ2MDAMowmg1aNSD4MnO/DAiH52E2CRj/CJz3sqzv /IqRO4mAol/6VjVfZcuRmtbJlKIjK0NuPL5NyWw7oaPytrxuBulf//wvL9/tjs5XpEDa rtCkHSKJRJXmRKLXEoBrIV1Z6EFWVmXh9CD98qQIh2w4NufE55MSu1M8qhFom6emZ2Lc BH5g== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcrYErFW6ElZxrWeOY2/HNHOoY18ufHTb6wUZ+fi4UjdZqZuv24iU4pLVft8khEWiU7VakvoMcz5ekDNw== X-Received: by 10.25.193.198 with SMTP id r189mr8878173lff.21.1477651003322; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 03:36:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: andrea.veri@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.174.205 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 03:36:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrea Veri Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:36:42 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DFP-i6SbL-zh5WpOOo0L4bNTek4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Removing my account To: Ronald van Zon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: GNOME Infrastructure X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:36:47 -0000 Hey, we tend to avoid removing accounts to not break database relationships and to keep a log of the users that registered to the websites we manage just in case they behaved badly / legal purposes. I did however mark your account as inactive. Thanks, 2016-10-24 11:54 GMT+02:00 Ronald van Zon : > I have an account at https://extensions.gnome.org/ and I would like it to be > removed. > my username is Eagllus > > With kind regards, > > Eagllus > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-infrastructure mailing list > gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure -- Cheers, Andrea Debian Developer, Fedora / EPEL packager, GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator, GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary, GNOME Foundation Membership & Elections Committee Chairman Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~av From jehan.marmottard@gmail.com Fri Oct 28 12:05:19 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60CA76C1B; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:05:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gb-ll8z4I1se; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f181.google.com (mail-ua0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B077876BF9; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 20so36758089uak.0; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:05:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/v9gP1cdP+MX+EwKl2Ulwet7EF4TuXFdZTXMYdNbtjY=; b=VCg/3wecsdKd4fCsACPyar+tWD3ZNZdrGMHVA1MgK+zIHHVbS9HiP8u+cxG5V/hFW3 EuVNTJi0Re7DGSWCI5np8LQW25+WZUzKOfPlwh2x2l8sZARZq03pxLEGrGDrea46sDC8 4ZJU0getLZFubvQzuk3masOSWQahwJNc1oRkscupAHPZvKk/vz3mTuuM/2VmBYH26mBm 8O68AoXgdEhjsdsIxPxttM51lzbsLdlQDceMBoQD9yz8uMWfwue5LUXoYK5R/Hv9sd4l nzGHJRbMA95JODJdQFYbrgKBT3oMZmNQU+Co9MlFzeq6wMvZ7qxSHiNlhauksKSNXzFM UcuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/v9gP1cdP+MX+EwKl2Ulwet7EF4TuXFdZTXMYdNbtjY=; b=dzKXGPevDkA5FUQ9z8VqFhkXvc5PgzK7BXWzEm1pIOBZI4Atg7oq3eer6DzwsTvv32 iRQXZiVraYzJN1IL8XrHcWzmNzsiDqhwzPNamecZxjuOB1IGwoyxE4OVfJh5l8k2+wU3 8feL2lgQMuU4GKS904J22yZpBDdrVT+2tCN/+2MS3sCfRB+jRpbVKfN3GwxnU0gN8foc nbxaoU827oAegeFgi023RG29N+MeNJ3LRgYOYXK9YnUt0LzhAIYhW8IJzDfLptf1fjXg ZKY/zcLSCXawcF7PJvkAdTNIWIBg+tch26g6o5tL+M9MZumuOmslI+kvskZ3erhyVPr8 KwzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdiwmzb4bIL3DAvqmGN7MkRVsZtg2RS5S1iEBCcaWESpRp2sQ7wkYVERw7K1Hry1wwE6GbCWcnh0Cj8ng== X-Received: by 10.176.5.137 with SMTP id e9mr7239583uae.109.1477656316153; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:05:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:04:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVoYW4gUGFnw6hz?= Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:04:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Who can close GIMP pull requests on github? To: Andrea Veri Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: GNOME Infrastructure X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:05:19 -0000 Hi, On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Andrea Veri wrote: > Hey, > > please provide me your github username so I can include you on the > GIMP repository as a collaborator. About closing pull requests My Github username is "Jehan". I was not really planning (nor looking forward) to be given rights, but if this is what it takes to clean up this repository from issues and pull requests, so be it. Fortunately there are not many. :-) > automatically we are looking into using an automated script that > should close the issue and forward the user to Bugzilla. [1] Awesome. Thanks. Jehan > cheers, > > [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D748078 > > 2016-10-25 18:05 GMT+02:00 Jehan Pag=C3=A8s : >> Hello! >> >> I have asked this on the desktop-devel-list@ mailing list months ago, >> but never got any answers so I try again on this list. Please if this >> is not considered "infrastructure" hence is again the wrong list, tell >> me where I should ask. >> >> Who has the power over GNOME's github mirrors? >> Could anyone close these: https://github.com/gnome/gimp/pulls >> >> All these "pull requests" are either obsolete, or taken care of, or >> the reporter moved one's requests to bugzilla so they are all good for >> closing. >> >> Also could it be possible to forbid new pull requests and redirect >> people to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=3DGIMP >> instead? Does github provide this kind of feature? >> Thanks. >> >> Jehan >> >> -- >> ZeMarmot open animation film >> http://film.zemarmot.net >> Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot >> Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot >> _______________________________________________ >> gnome-infrastructure mailing list >> gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure > > > > -- > Cheers, > > Andrea > > Debian Developer, > Fedora / EPEL packager, > GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator, > GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary, > GNOME Foundation Membership & Elections Committee Chairman > > Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~av --=20 ZeMarmot open animation film http://film.zemarmot.net Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot From friemann@gnome.org Sat Oct 29 12:54:28 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02652763D9 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:54:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.421 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.421 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UE35sIhO4nbt for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:54:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 1642 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at restaurant.gnome.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:54:27 UTC Received: from wp102.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp102.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.109]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F96760A5 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p5b00a2b5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.0.162.181] helo=kirschsaft.fritz.box); authenticated by wp102.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1c0Sj0-0008Cb-D1; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:27:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1477744021.2778.3.camel@gnome.org> Subject: Handling spammers in Bugzilla From: Felix Riemann To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:27:01 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;friemann@gnome.org;1477745667;cb101cb4; X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:54:28 -0000 Hi! Just wanted to ask whether we have special procedures for dealing with spammers in our Bugzilla instance. I guess at least the accounts will be locked or deleted. Shall I just close the spam ticket (#772428) or is it going to be deleted, so the spammer doesn't receive a response? Thanks, Felix From ak-47@gmx.net Sat Oct 29 17:53:06 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD686765A3; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:53:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.768 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.768 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.418, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ytkVxEM5Ilyz; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB8777628E; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from canis.lupus ([89.177.56.113]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LiHc7-1ceoQx39m7-00nSzA; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:53:00 +0200 Message-ID: <1477763579.30973.1.camel@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Handling spammers in Bugzilla From: Andre Klapper To: Felix Riemann , gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:52:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1477744021.2778.3.camel@gnome.org> References: <1477744021.2778.3.camel@gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:geY5jsBR+Gz638IY37nG3FeJFPtWP6bUBl7UDP4kh18Az7p5BGm TcSaoZKeOzmC8TiyAmi5Uzy/McHlAuAbm6EshMRo151veKnPYbzYkxjE5YunJHP781O/ds7 E+ppNWYE2gFMoI0D1dtBwgscQPikrjUWtNhcUBB+3nc8wPTqMBiCEO+s/K59rcwytus3pbt iSEslvu53SD++HrkFrHww== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:20oI25z29Ag=:idfyMPeFggXaCJmtkfd7P7 9MacO4u97YXt8v/vELPgS0TW5/63wLWtdpCS71Cb5haYKm2e5ZJY3wMglUipaZXH5b+7OW1X2 Y9aXB2vu5vcq8/pReACBxGA9GB8sTS8AcF1DRGyV0V3ScHKtytIo5HtwZZ8AaRzR03FVnKliZ WP9og38NFrHivjov8K50MB7DdNrw90tBr3QNveA9fsnt3HwsOfpippxn1t0CsOassUMoE7OaU PJwJaOpkI2tjAlAmVbxOzulapneIWoMHa7Amn3RJ4sY1AYM7FOCCVg1sYKMYj/6NHbJlyWANB fjE8eaMtywd8b4ItkwTifF/vxyCKS4V+S5r1xy1vJBYig23U3APV4aC9eU3r3fjrbs8kf5325 ysODPFm8PmynViTogkQF8kksGD/B21jPUOT113H9/BHS5wZ5puztpVoWYitody0M5xlFp0d19 +lcrsRhjcTiHr+ku2rW+Yi3WSAY0ioqX7jlZ+ZKQkBH5zmOibvDUxTmdMz9er/SB0aNnXJpqw 2qJrUq+LuEhHpsATfqUeILYM1AAhkf9PG7GbDHYnfw2v9kZG0ZG9g5QWLZR0z7naRoYOvFHSs ycECbWKjtd3ae7nBGVPHRiX6SO1OEvyXtf6CCSNGStCDH6ry58D/vQdLYRLI/C1UsCqcDdP7p A0XwYacqk1i6xvRjjrIywUpZPK47F39AeBd3QELqxznBW44CO3/ypuNmRsDSmG4DEUKhoY2gE KniurtWP51Pbhgw7hrC51q3Tr+O0G9XMQ+jtbFIkljK/TK/+Ij9QE1P8Qayi3SX9EcFrZn2uQ haUvx33 Cc: bugmaster@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:53:06 -0000 +CC:=C2=A0bugmaster@gnome.org On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 14:27 +0200, Felix Riemann wrote: > Just wanted to ask whether we have special procedures for dealing > with > spammers in our Bugzilla instance. I guess at least the accounts will > be locked or deleted. >=20 > Shall I just close the spam ticket (#772428) or is it going to be > deleted, so the spammer doesn't receive a response? We cannot delete stuff but mark the report and the potential attachment as less public, and deactivate such user accounts. I'll take care of that ticket. andre --=20 Andre Klapper | ak-47@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ From bugzilla@gnome.org Mon Oct 31 15:58:39 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F0976A95 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:58:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=2 WHITELISTED tests=[] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lf7GiMukzjET for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugzilla.gnome.org (bugzilla-back [172.31.1.45]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCE9576A40 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bugzilla.gnome.org (Postfix, from userid 502) id B48D51CE8FB; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:58:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "sysadmin" (GNOME Bugzilla) To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Subject: [Bug 675934] api.gnome.org/jhbuild/* Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:58:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: QAcontact AssignedTo sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs X-Bugzilla-Classification: Infrastructure X-Bugzilla-Product: sysadmin X-Bugzilla-Component: Other X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jjardon@gnome.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1477929517.F67ACA23109.17984" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:58:39 -0000 --1477929517.F67ACA23109.17984 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:58:37 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D675934 --- Comment #16 from Javier Jard=C3=B3n (IRC: jjardon) = --- Works like a charm, thanks! Can we change the redirection so we always have a "master" folder and then = we add 3.24, 3.26 ... etc when we a new release is out? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the QA Contact of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.= --1477929517.F67ACA23109.17984 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:58:37 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Comment= # 16 on bug 675934<= /a> from Javier Jard=C3=B3n= (IRC: jjardon)

Works like a charm, thanks!

Can we change the redirection so we always have a "master" folder=
 and then we
add 3.24, 3.26 ... etc when we a new release is out?

You are receiving this mail because: =20=20=20=20=20=20

You are watching the QA Contact of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

= --1477929517.F67ACA23109.17984-- From bugzilla@gnome.org Mon Oct 31 16:27:00 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4726276A86 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:27:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=2 WHITELISTED tests=[] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vvaer6R1YZ_1 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugzilla.gnome.org (bugzilla-back [172.31.1.45]) by smtp.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231E776AB5 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bugzilla.gnome.org (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1D6D31CE900; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:26:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "sysadmin" (GNOME Bugzilla) To: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org Subject: [Bug 675934] api.gnome.org/jhbuild/* Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:26:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: QAcontact AssignedTo sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs X-Bugzilla-Classification: Infrastructure X-Bugzilla-Product: sysadmin X-Bugzilla-Component: Other X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jjardon@gnome.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1477931211.72bF3EfA306.6674" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Public discussions for the gnome.org hosted services and infrastructure" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:27:00 -0000 --1477931211.72bF3EfA306.6674 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:26:51 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D675934 Javier Jard=C3=B3n (IRC: jjardon) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #17 from Javier Jard=C3=B3n (IRC: jjardon) = --- (In reply to Javier Jard=C3=B3n (IRC: jjardon) from comment #16) > Works like a charm, thanks! >=20 > Can we change the redirection so we always have a "master" folder and then > we add 3.24, 3.26 ... etc when we a new release is out? This has been implemented as well, thanks Andrea! Closing ... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the QA Contact of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.= --1477931211.72bF3EfA306.6674 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:26:51 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Javier Jard=C3=B3n (IRC: jj= ardon) changed bug 675934<= /a>

What	Removed	Added
Status	REOPENED	RESOLVED
Resolution	---	FIXED

Comment= # 17 on bug 675934<= /a> from Javier Jard=C3=B3n= (IRC: jjardon)

(In reply to Javier Jard=C3=B3n (IRC: jjardon) from comment #16)
> Works like a charm, thanks!
>=20
> Can we change the redirection so we always have a "master" f=
older and then
> we add 3.24, 3.26 ... etc when we a new release is out?

This has been implemented as well, thanks Andrea! Closing ...

You are receiving this mail because: =20=20=20=20=20=20

You are watching the QA Contact of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

= --1477931211.72bF3EfA306.6674--

Bug ID	772384
Summary	Mailing list for GNOME Calendar
Classification	Infrastructure
Product	sysadmin
Version	unspecified
OS	Linux
Status	NEW
Severity	normal
Priority	Normal
Component	Mailman
Assignee	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs
Reporter	georges.stavracas@gmail.com
QA Contact	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs
GNOME version	---

Bug ID	772544
Summary	Add shell extensions mailing list
Classification	Infrastructure
Product	sysadmin
Version	unspecified
OS	Linux
Status	NEW
Severity	normal
Priority	Normal
Component	Mailman
Assignee	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs
Reporter	maweki@gmail.com
QA Contact	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs
GNOME version	---

Bug ID	772897
Summary	Consider switching from StartCom to a different CA
Classification	Infrastructure
Product	sysadmin
Version	unspecified
OS	All
Status	NEW
Severity	minor
Priority	Normal
Component	Certificates
Assignee	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs
Reporter	userwithuid@gmail.com
QA Contact	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs
GNOME version	---

What	Removed	Added
CC		tomtryf@gnome.org
Component	wiki.gnome.org	Other
Version	current	unspecified
Assignee	website-wiki-maint@gnome.bugs	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs
Product	website	sysadmin
QA Contact	website-wiki-maint@gnome.bugs	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs

Bug ID	773229
Summary	Please create a gnome-multi-writer bugzilla entry
Classification	Infrastructure
Product	sysadmin
Version	unspecified
OS	Linux
Status	NEW
Severity	normal
Priority	Normal
Component	Other
Assignee	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs
Reporter	richard@hughsie.com
QA Contact	sysadmin-maint@gnome.bugs
GNOME version	---