From spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Sat Mar 2 08:13:49 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (foo.stahl.nu [194.18.231.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41541813E for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 08:13:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Darkmere.psychozone (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CD8F23A4E for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:14:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:14:17 +0100 From: Spider To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Subject: hardcoded paths' in my .so* files Message-Id: <20020302141417.2c470ecb.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Reply-To: spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Message: Why does this appear like this? X-Apparently-From: Jupiter X-A_Mail_Client_Is_Not_A_Web_Browser:

12:00

X-Complaints-To: /dev/null Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4" Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I'm working on packaging gnome2 for distribution, not as rpm but as ebuild, but the idea is the same. right now I'm using: ./configure --host=${CHOST} \ --prefix=/usr \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --infodir=/usr/share/info \ --mandir=/usr/share/man \ --with-gdktarget=x11 \ --enable-debug=yes || die and . make prefix=${D}/usr \ sysconfdir=${D}/etc \ infodir=${D}/usr/share/info \ mandir=${D}/usr/share/man \ install || die but, a quick grep -r ${D} /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/* will make a lot (if not all) of the .so files match ... and this is after they have been installed. am I doing something wrong here, or is my system's binutils messed up? //Spider --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8gNArXNNftdcUD70RAmOhAJwN7z4LG/vOOsPY7U+J80gGaKxBxACfekDl CD2XXP1tcIwjmLz9Q++3ISo= =zoLV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4-- From jens@triq.net Mon Mar 4 15:16:34 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de (eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.120.3]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A9B180EC for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 15:16:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from doolin.darkride.net (a1as02-p207.hh.tli.de [195.252.131.207]) by eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de (submission) with ESMTP id B65262AA557 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:16:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doolin.darkride.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with ESMTP id 5CA3CD79B for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:18:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:18:01 +0100 (CET) From: Jens Finke X-X-Sender: To: Subject: eog HACKING updates Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, just want to inform you that I've added the following paragraph to the "Eye of Gnome" HACKING file: Hacking on the Eye of Gnome =========================== o spec file: People from the gnome packaging project are welcome to contribute fixes for the spec file. Regards, Jens -- "Wer die Freiheit aufgibt, um Sicherheit zu gewinnen, wird am Ende beides verlieren." -- Benjamin Franklin From neurotic_monkey@yahoo.com Mon Mar 11 23:46:33 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from b.smtp-out.sonic.net (b.smtp-out.sonic.net [208.201.224.39]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3EA8188B5 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:46:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 11598 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 04:44:53 -0000 Received: from ultra.sonic.net (208.201.224.22) by b.smtp-out.sonic.net with SMTP; 12 Mar 2002 04:44:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (d171.nas23.sonic.net [209.204.137.171]) by ultra.sonic.net (8.11.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id g2C4kVA26800 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:46:31 -0800 X-envelope-info: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:44:03 -0800 Subject: Darwin User Here Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) From: Anthony de Almeida Lopes To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20020312043901.3CEE618147@mail.gnome.org> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello all, I run X/Windows and GNOME 1.4 on a Darwin (FreeBSD Lite on PowerPC) and I wanted to know if there were plans to make binaries of GNOME 2 (or any future versions) for Darwin-PPC. I hate compiling from source. I asked Nat Friedman over at Ximian if they were planning on doing it and so far no response. For binaries on Darwin we only have two ways of doing that: Fink (http://fink.sf.net) projects or GNU Darwin (http://gnu- darwin.sf.net) Any info would be helpful! * antoni From spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Wed Mar 20 22:22:10 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (foo.stahl.nu [194.18.231.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695D4192BF for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:22:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Darkmere.psychozone (Postfix) with SMTP id D138A23286 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:22:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:22:48 +0100 From: Spider To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Subject: What packages are "ready" for testing? Message-Id: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Message: Why does this appear like this? X-Apparently-From: Jupiter X-A_Mail_Client_Is_Not_A_Web_Browser:

12:00

X-Complaints-To: /dev/null Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2" Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just wondering what packages are ready for testing in a larger market as of the moment. I have gnome2-beta2 and the packages in there up-to-date and covered, at least they all compile and install... but, there's a lot more to gnome2 than that little desktop part. Which of the other packages would be ready? somone here who knows? My goal is to get all the packages set and ready for testing, but I have a feeling that some of them are closer to working state than others, and figured the people here could know. //Spider -- begin happy99.exe This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8mVINXNNftdcUD70RAnacAJ9gCqXj/ss2+NY7nktggBrrbaIi0wCfTiFQ wnf5eWbeh5hNxI+djRyWuc0= =5C+t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2-- From evandrofg@ig.com.br Thu Mar 21 12:20:55 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from cmgiovan.terra.com.br (dl-adsl-sao-C8D571E8.sao.terra.com.br [200.213.113.232]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97121883C for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:20:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by cmgiovan.terra.com.br (Postfix, from userid 500) id 742CA10091; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:20:27 -0300 (BRT) Subject: Re: What packages are "ready" for testing? From: Evandro Fernandes Giovanini To: Spider Cc: gnome-packaging-list@lists.gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> References: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 21 Mar 2002 14:20:26 -0300 Message-Id: <1016731227.848.61.camel@cmgiovan.terra.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 00:22, Spider wrote: > Just wondering what packages are ready for testing in a larger market as of the moment. > I have gnome2-beta2 and the packages in there up-to-date and covered, at least they all compile and install... but, there's a lot more to gnome2 than that little desktop part. Which of the other packages would be ready? somone here who knows? > All the packages in releases/gnome-2.0-desktop-beta2 are ready for testing. In addition to these some packages have been ported to the GNOME 2 platform and can be found in the sources/ directory. They will not be included with GNOME 2 and could not be in beta quality yet, it depends on the package. > My goal is to get all the packages set and ready for testing, but I have a feeling that some of them are closer to working state than others, and figured the people here could know. > > > //Spider > > -- > begin happy99.exe > This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! > See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. > end -- Evandro From spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Sat Mar 2 08:13:49 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (foo.stahl.nu [194.18.231.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41541813E for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 08:13:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Darkmere.psychozone (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CD8F23A4E for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:14:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:14:17 +0100 From: Spider To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Subject: hardcoded paths' in my .so* files Message-Id: <20020302141417.2c470ecb.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Reply-To: spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Message: Why does this appear like this? X-Apparently-From: Jupiter X-A_Mail_Client_Is_Not_A_Web_Browser:

12:00

X-Complaints-To: /dev/null Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4" Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I'm working on packaging gnome2 for distribution, not as rpm but as ebuild, but the idea is the same. right now I'm using: ./configure --host=${CHOST} \ --prefix=/usr \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --infodir=/usr/share/info \ --mandir=/usr/share/man \ --with-gdktarget=x11 \ --enable-debug=yes || die and . make prefix=${D}/usr \ sysconfdir=${D}/etc \ infodir=${D}/usr/share/info \ mandir=${D}/usr/share/man \ install || die but, a quick grep -r ${D} /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/* will make a lot (if not all) of the .so files match ... and this is after they have been installed. am I doing something wrong here, or is my system's binutils messed up? //Spider --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8gNArXNNftdcUD70RAmOhAJwN7z4LG/vOOsPY7U+J80gGaKxBxACfekDl CD2XXP1tcIwjmLz9Q++3ISo= =zoLV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4-- From jens@triq.net Mon Mar 4 15:16:34 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de (eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.120.3]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A9B180EC for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 15:16:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from doolin.darkride.net (a1as02-p207.hh.tli.de [195.252.131.207]) by eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de (submission) with ESMTP id B65262AA557 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:16:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doolin.darkride.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with ESMTP id 5CA3CD79B for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:18:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:18:01 +0100 (CET) From: Jens Finke X-X-Sender: To: Subject: eog HACKING updates Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, just want to inform you that I've added the following paragraph to the "Eye of Gnome" HACKING file: Hacking on the Eye of Gnome =========================== o spec file: People from the gnome packaging project are welcome to contribute fixes for the spec file. Regards, Jens -- "Wer die Freiheit aufgibt, um Sicherheit zu gewinnen, wird am Ende beides verlieren." -- Benjamin Franklin From neurotic_monkey@yahoo.com Mon Mar 11 23:46:33 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from b.smtp-out.sonic.net (b.smtp-out.sonic.net [208.201.224.39]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3EA8188B5 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:46:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 11598 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 04:44:53 -0000 Received: from ultra.sonic.net (208.201.224.22) by b.smtp-out.sonic.net with SMTP; 12 Mar 2002 04:44:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (d171.nas23.sonic.net [209.204.137.171]) by ultra.sonic.net (8.11.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id g2C4kVA26800 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:46:31 -0800 X-envelope-info: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:44:03 -0800 Subject: Darwin User Here Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) From: Anthony de Almeida Lopes To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20020312043901.3CEE618147@mail.gnome.org> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello all, I run X/Windows and GNOME 1.4 on a Darwin (FreeBSD Lite on PowerPC) and I wanted to know if there were plans to make binaries of GNOME 2 (or any future versions) for Darwin-PPC. I hate compiling from source. I asked Nat Friedman over at Ximian if they were planning on doing it and so far no response. For binaries on Darwin we only have two ways of doing that: Fink (http://fink.sf.net) projects or GNU Darwin (http://gnu- darwin.sf.net) Any info would be helpful! * antoni From spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Wed Mar 20 22:22:10 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (foo.stahl.nu [194.18.231.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695D4192BF for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:22:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Darkmere.psychozone (Postfix) with SMTP id D138A23286 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:22:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:22:48 +0100 From: Spider To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Subject: What packages are "ready" for testing? Message-Id: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Message: Why does this appear like this? X-Apparently-From: Jupiter X-A_Mail_Client_Is_Not_A_Web_Browser:

12:00

X-Complaints-To: /dev/null Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2" Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just wondering what packages are ready for testing in a larger market as of the moment. I have gnome2-beta2 and the packages in there up-to-date and covered, at least they all compile and install... but, there's a lot more to gnome2 than that little desktop part. Which of the other packages would be ready? somone here who knows? My goal is to get all the packages set and ready for testing, but I have a feeling that some of them are closer to working state than others, and figured the people here could know. //Spider -- begin happy99.exe This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8mVINXNNftdcUD70RAnacAJ9gCqXj/ss2+NY7nktggBrrbaIi0wCfTiFQ wnf5eWbeh5hNxI+djRyWuc0= =5C+t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2-- From evandrofg@ig.com.br Thu Mar 21 12:20:55 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from cmgiovan.terra.com.br (dl-adsl-sao-C8D571E8.sao.terra.com.br [200.213.113.232]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97121883C for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:20:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by cmgiovan.terra.com.br (Postfix, from userid 500) id 742CA10091; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:20:27 -0300 (BRT) Subject: Re: What packages are "ready" for testing? From: Evandro Fernandes Giovanini To: Spider Cc: gnome-packaging-list@lists.gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> References: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 21 Mar 2002 14:20:26 -0300 Message-Id: <1016731227.848.61.camel@cmgiovan.terra.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 00:22, Spider wrote: > Just wondering what packages are ready for testing in a larger market as of the moment. > I have gnome2-beta2 and the packages in there up-to-date and covered, at least they all compile and install... but, there's a lot more to gnome2 than that little desktop part. Which of the other packages would be ready? somone here who knows? > All the packages in releases/gnome-2.0-desktop-beta2 are ready for testing. In addition to these some packages have been ported to the GNOME 2 platform and can be found in the sources/ directory. They will not be included with GNOME 2 and could not be in beta quality yet, it depends on the package. > My goal is to get all the packages set and ready for testing, but I have a feeling that some of them are closer to working state than others, and figured the people here could know. > > > //Spider > > -- > begin happy99.exe > This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! > See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. > end -- Evandro From spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Sat Mar 2 08:13:49 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (foo.stahl.nu [194.18.231.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41541813E for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 08:13:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Darkmere.psychozone (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CD8F23A4E for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:14:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:14:17 +0100 From: Spider To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Subject: hardcoded paths' in my .so* files Message-Id: <20020302141417.2c470ecb.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Reply-To: spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Message: Why does this appear like this? X-Apparently-From: Jupiter X-A_Mail_Client_Is_Not_A_Web_Browser:

12:00

X-Complaints-To: /dev/null Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4" Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I'm working on packaging gnome2 for distribution, not as rpm but as ebuild, but the idea is the same. right now I'm using: ./configure --host=${CHOST} \ --prefix=/usr \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --infodir=/usr/share/info \ --mandir=/usr/share/man \ --with-gdktarget=x11 \ --enable-debug=yes || die and . make prefix=${D}/usr \ sysconfdir=${D}/etc \ infodir=${D}/usr/share/info \ mandir=${D}/usr/share/man \ install || die but, a quick grep -r ${D} /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/* will make a lot (if not all) of the .so files match ... and this is after they have been installed. am I doing something wrong here, or is my system's binutils messed up? //Spider --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8gNArXNNftdcUD70RAmOhAJwN7z4LG/vOOsPY7U+J80gGaKxBxACfekDl CD2XXP1tcIwjmLz9Q++3ISo= =zoLV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4-- From jens@triq.net Mon Mar 4 15:16:34 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de (eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.120.3]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A9B180EC for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 15:16:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from doolin.darkride.net (a1as02-p207.hh.tli.de [195.252.131.207]) by eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de (submission) with ESMTP id B65262AA557 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:16:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doolin.darkride.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with ESMTP id 5CA3CD79B for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:18:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:18:01 +0100 (CET) From: Jens Finke X-X-Sender: To: Subject: eog HACKING updates Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, just want to inform you that I've added the following paragraph to the "Eye of Gnome" HACKING file: Hacking on the Eye of Gnome =========================== o spec file: People from the gnome packaging project are welcome to contribute fixes for the spec file. Regards, Jens -- "Wer die Freiheit aufgibt, um Sicherheit zu gewinnen, wird am Ende beides verlieren." -- Benjamin Franklin From neurotic_monkey@yahoo.com Mon Mar 11 23:46:33 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from b.smtp-out.sonic.net (b.smtp-out.sonic.net [208.201.224.39]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3EA8188B5 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:46:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 11598 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 04:44:53 -0000 Received: from ultra.sonic.net (208.201.224.22) by b.smtp-out.sonic.net with SMTP; 12 Mar 2002 04:44:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (d171.nas23.sonic.net [209.204.137.171]) by ultra.sonic.net (8.11.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id g2C4kVA26800 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:46:31 -0800 X-envelope-info: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:44:03 -0800 Subject: Darwin User Here Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) From: Anthony de Almeida Lopes To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20020312043901.3CEE618147@mail.gnome.org> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello all, I run X/Windows and GNOME 1.4 on a Darwin (FreeBSD Lite on PowerPC) and I wanted to know if there were plans to make binaries of GNOME 2 (or any future versions) for Darwin-PPC. I hate compiling from source. I asked Nat Friedman over at Ximian if they were planning on doing it and so far no response. For binaries on Darwin we only have two ways of doing that: Fink (http://fink.sf.net) projects or GNU Darwin (http://gnu- darwin.sf.net) Any info would be helpful! * antoni From spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Wed Mar 20 22:22:10 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (foo.stahl.nu [194.18.231.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695D4192BF for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:22:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Darkmere.psychozone (Postfix) with SMTP id D138A23286 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:22:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:22:48 +0100 From: Spider To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Subject: What packages are "ready" for testing? Message-Id: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Message: Why does this appear like this? X-Apparently-From: Jupiter X-A_Mail_Client_Is_Not_A_Web_Browser:

12:00

X-Complaints-To: /dev/null Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2" Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just wondering what packages are ready for testing in a larger market as of the moment. I have gnome2-beta2 and the packages in there up-to-date and covered, at least they all compile and install... but, there's a lot more to gnome2 than that little desktop part. Which of the other packages would be ready? somone here who knows? My goal is to get all the packages set and ready for testing, but I have a feeling that some of them are closer to working state than others, and figured the people here could know. //Spider -- begin happy99.exe This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8mVINXNNftdcUD70RAnacAJ9gCqXj/ss2+NY7nktggBrrbaIi0wCfTiFQ wnf5eWbeh5hNxI+djRyWuc0= =5C+t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2-- From evandrofg@ig.com.br Thu Mar 21 12:20:55 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from cmgiovan.terra.com.br (dl-adsl-sao-C8D571E8.sao.terra.com.br [200.213.113.232]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97121883C for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:20:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by cmgiovan.terra.com.br (Postfix, from userid 500) id 742CA10091; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:20:27 -0300 (BRT) Subject: Re: What packages are "ready" for testing? From: Evandro Fernandes Giovanini To: Spider Cc: gnome-packaging-list@lists.gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> References: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 21 Mar 2002 14:20:26 -0300 Message-Id: <1016731227.848.61.camel@cmgiovan.terra.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 00:22, Spider wrote: > Just wondering what packages are ready for testing in a larger market as of the moment. > I have gnome2-beta2 and the packages in there up-to-date and covered, at least they all compile and install... but, there's a lot more to gnome2 than that little desktop part. Which of the other packages would be ready? somone here who knows? > All the packages in releases/gnome-2.0-desktop-beta2 are ready for testing. In addition to these some packages have been ported to the GNOME 2 platform and can be found in the sources/ directory. They will not be included with GNOME 2 and could not be in beta quality yet, it depends on the package. > My goal is to get all the packages set and ready for testing, but I have a feeling that some of them are closer to working state than others, and figured the people here could know. > > > //Spider > > -- > begin happy99.exe > This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! > See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. > end -- Evandro From spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Sat Mar 2 08:13:49 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (foo.stahl.nu [194.18.231.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41541813E for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 08:13:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Darkmere.psychozone (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CD8F23A4E for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:14:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:14:17 +0100 From: Spider To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Subject: hardcoded paths' in my .so* files Message-Id: <20020302141417.2c470ecb.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Reply-To: spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Message: Why does this appear like this? X-Apparently-From: Jupiter X-A_Mail_Client_Is_Not_A_Web_Browser:

12:00

X-Complaints-To: /dev/null Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4" Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I'm working on packaging gnome2 for distribution, not as rpm but as ebuild, but the idea is the same. right now I'm using: ./configure --host=${CHOST} \ --prefix=/usr \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --infodir=/usr/share/info \ --mandir=/usr/share/man \ --with-gdktarget=x11 \ --enable-debug=yes || die and . make prefix=${D}/usr \ sysconfdir=${D}/etc \ infodir=${D}/usr/share/info \ mandir=${D}/usr/share/man \ install || die but, a quick grep -r ${D} /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/* will make a lot (if not all) of the .so files match ... and this is after they have been installed. am I doing something wrong here, or is my system's binutils messed up? //Spider --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8gNArXNNftdcUD70RAmOhAJwN7z4LG/vOOsPY7U+J80gGaKxBxACfekDl CD2XXP1tcIwjmLz9Q++3ISo= =zoLV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.:Dsd2TiKNJfHj4-- From jens@triq.net Mon Mar 4 15:16:34 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de (eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.120.3]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A9B180EC for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 15:16:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from doolin.darkride.net (a1as02-p207.hh.tli.de [195.252.131.207]) by eric.pmnet.uni-oldenburg.de (submission) with ESMTP id B65262AA557 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:16:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doolin.darkride.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with ESMTP id 5CA3CD79B for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:18:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:18:01 +0100 (CET) From: Jens Finke X-X-Sender: To: Subject: eog HACKING updates Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, just want to inform you that I've added the following paragraph to the "Eye of Gnome" HACKING file: Hacking on the Eye of Gnome =========================== o spec file: People from the gnome packaging project are welcome to contribute fixes for the spec file. Regards, Jens -- "Wer die Freiheit aufgibt, um Sicherheit zu gewinnen, wird am Ende beides verlieren." -- Benjamin Franklin From neurotic_monkey@yahoo.com Mon Mar 11 23:46:33 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from b.smtp-out.sonic.net (b.smtp-out.sonic.net [208.201.224.39]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3EA8188B5 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:46:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 11598 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 04:44:53 -0000 Received: from ultra.sonic.net (208.201.224.22) by b.smtp-out.sonic.net with SMTP; 12 Mar 2002 04:44:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (d171.nas23.sonic.net [209.204.137.171]) by ultra.sonic.net (8.11.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id g2C4kVA26800 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:46:31 -0800 X-envelope-info: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:44:03 -0800 Subject: Darwin User Here Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) From: Anthony de Almeida Lopes To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20020312043901.3CEE618147@mail.gnome.org> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello all, I run X/Windows and GNOME 1.4 on a Darwin (FreeBSD Lite on PowerPC) and I wanted to know if there were plans to make binaries of GNOME 2 (or any future versions) for Darwin-PPC. I hate compiling from source. I asked Nat Friedman over at Ximian if they were planning on doing it and so far no response. For binaries on Darwin we only have two ways of doing that: Fink (http://fink.sf.net) projects or GNU Darwin (http://gnu- darwin.sf.net) Any info would be helpful! * antoni From spider@darkmere.wanfear.com Wed Mar 20 22:22:10 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (foo.stahl.nu [194.18.231.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695D4192BF for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:22:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Darkmere.psychozone (Postfix) with SMTP id D138A23286 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:22:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:22:48 +0100 From: Spider To: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org Subject: What packages are "ready" for testing? Message-Id: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Message: Why does this appear like this? X-Apparently-From: Jupiter X-A_Mail_Client_Is_Not_A_Web_Browser:

12:00

X-Complaints-To: /dev/null Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2" Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just wondering what packages are ready for testing in a larger market as of the moment. I have gnome2-beta2 and the packages in there up-to-date and covered, at least they all compile and install... but, there's a lot more to gnome2 than that little desktop part. Which of the other packages would be ready? somone here who knows? My goal is to get all the packages set and ready for testing, but I have a feeling that some of them are closer to working state than others, and figured the people here could know. //Spider -- begin happy99.exe This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8mVINXNNftdcUD70RAnacAJ9gCqXj/ss2+NY7nktggBrrbaIi0wCfTiFQ wnf5eWbeh5hNxI+djRyWuc0= =5C+t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.lA+GH9SXTPy4(2-- From evandrofg@ig.com.br Thu Mar 21 12:20:55 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-packaging-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from cmgiovan.terra.com.br (dl-adsl-sao-C8D571E8.sao.terra.com.br [200.213.113.232]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97121883C for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:20:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by cmgiovan.terra.com.br (Postfix, from userid 500) id 742CA10091; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:20:27 -0300 (BRT) Subject: Re: What packages are "ready" for testing? From: Evandro Fernandes Giovanini To: Spider Cc: gnome-packaging-list@lists.gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> References: <20020321042248.50fc271e.spider@darkmere.wanfear.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 21 Mar 2002 14:20:26 -0300 Message-Id: <1016731227.848.61.camel@cmgiovan.terra.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-packaging-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-packaging-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Mailing list for the GNOME packaging project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 00:22, Spider wrote: > Just wondering what packages are ready for testing in a larger market as of the moment. > I have gnome2-beta2 and the packages in there up-to-date and covered, at least they all compile and install... but, there's a lot more to gnome2 than that little desktop part. Which of the other packages would be ready? somone here who knows? > All the packages in releases/gnome-2.0-desktop-beta2 are ready for testing. In addition to these some packages have been ported to the GNOME 2 platform and can be found in the sources/ directory. They will not be included with GNOME 2 and could not be in beta quality yet, it depends on the package. > My goal is to get all the packages set and ready for testing, but I have a feeling that some of them are closer to working state than others, and figured the people here could know. > > > //Spider > > -- > begin happy99.exe > This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! > See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. > end -- Evandro