Re: btrfs, gnome-shell 3.26 and extensions / was: Re: Fw: Gnome extensions Please stop research...



Please suspend any research on this topic.

I just received 250+ updates to Fedora 27 beta.  I propose to do a clean installation and respond by Monday as to whether the problems  persist.

 
Regards

 Leslie
Leslie Satenstein
Montréal Québec, Canada




From: Olaf Leidinger <oleid mescharet de>
To: gnome-shell-list gnome org
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 5:18 AM
Subject: btrfs, gnome-shell 3.26 and extensions / was: Re: Fw: Gnome extensions

Hey Leslie,

what extensions are you using? I just installed gnome-shell-3.26 from Arch Linux's testing repos and it's working fine for me using btrfs. gnome-shell is hardly visible via 'top'.

Kind regards,
Olaf

Am 06.10.2017 um 03:46 schrieb Leslie S Satenstein via gnome-shell-list:
Do not (as 5 October) use Gnome with btrfs.  You can experience gnome-shell looping with 99% cpu busy,  schemas not being adhered to, and problems because btrfs uses copy-on-write.  I have 5 copies of Gnome 3.26 with ext4, brtfs fully, btrrs with xfs for /home  and more. I can substantiate the btrfs problem. Like any scientific experiment, you can duplicate my findings.

Gnome is safe with  a non "copy on write" file system.
 
Regards

 Leslie
Leslie Satenstein
Montréal Québec, Canada




----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Leslie S Satenstein via gnome-shell-list <gnome-shell-list gnome org>
To: Florian Müllner <fmuellner gnome org>; Gnome-shell-list <gnome-shell-list gnome org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 6:16 PM
Subject: Gnome extensions

Hi Florian

I'm using a few of your Gnome extensions.  I thank you for providing them to the community. 

I do have a question for you regarding the gnome-shell.

I have extensions (several that include yours), where the installation (doing the settings) onto a btrfs file system crashes the shell, or causes the shell to go into a 99.9% cpu loop.  If I install these extensions onto a non btrfs system, eg, ext4, lvm, xfs ,   the installation and extension setup works flawlessly. 

I use most of your extensions, that come globally with Fedora Linux (currently using the Fedora beta 1.5, the pending go-live beta). I am using it fully with btrfs.  I can crash the shell with one or two extensions, only if the underlying file system is btrfs

As the gnome-shell gets maintenance updates, I am see fewer and fewer crashes, but not with btrfs. The crashes only occur during parameter setup. It seems that the gnome-shell does not wrongly read the compiled schema or ignores the compiled schema.  Have you stress tested Gnome-shell under btrfs?  

My preferred third party extension that works perfectly with ext4 and xfs is TaskBar by Zpydr. I am walking through the source code and with my level of JS knowledge, find no errors. Setting TaskBar up onto a btrfs system crashes the shell, but on logging in after a crash, I see settings outside of the schema settings.  After a few crashes, when the settings are what I wanted, every extension works as anticipated.  By the way, I am not the author of this extension.  The author appears to have abandoned his offering.  What is his extension and one or two others exercising that cause this grief.
 
 I am wondering if recompiling the schemas while under btrfs would make a difference. I will give it a try.   



_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list




_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]