From asharma@samyak.com Tue Feb 1 07:39:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50723B0A6D for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11872-07 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA1E3B119C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:09:07 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020118085702698 ; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:08:57 +0530 Message-ID: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:08:20 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2005 12:39:07.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[05482EF0:01C5085B] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Bhaskar Trivedi , GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Which Audio/Video Codec source codes are available freely X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 12:39:18 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, I want to know whether the source codes for all Audio & Video codecs = available under Linux for H.323 based communication. G.711, G.722, G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729 H.261, H.263 From the voxgratia FAQ I got to know that G.728 and G.729 are not = freely available. Please help. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello All,
 
   I want to know whether the = source=20 codes for all Audio & Video codecs available under = Linux=20 for H.323 based communication.
 
  G.711, G.722,=20 G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729
  H.261, H.263
 
 From the voxgratia FAQ I got to = know that=20 G.728 and G.729 are not freely available.
 
Please help.
 
Thanks and regards,
Ashutosh = Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0-- From craigs@postincrement.com Tue Feb 1 15:18:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CD83B12AF for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08921-02 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344053B141C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.13] (rapido.southeren.com [10.0.2.13]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j11KHnxB016004; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:17:50 +1100 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:17:52 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: "asharma" , , "Bhaskar Trivedi" , "GnomeMeeting mailing list" In-Reply-To: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> Message-Id: <20050202071435.837F.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [OpenH323]Which Audio/Video Codec source codes are available freely X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:18:13 -0000 On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:08:20 +0530 "asharma" wrote: > Hello All, > > I want to know whether the source codes for all Audio & Video codecs available under Linux for H.323 based communication. > > G.711, G.722, G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729 > H.261, H.263 > > From the voxgratia FAQ I got to know that G.728 and G.729 are not freely available. The Vox Gratia FAQ does not mention G.728. But here is a general overview of the state of each of these codecs: G.711 - available in OpenH323 G.722 - available in OpenH323 G.723 - now G.726. Available in OpenH323 G.723.1 - patented G.728 = patented G.729 = patented H.261 - available in OpenH323 H.263 - Patent status uncertain. Available in OpenH323. Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From asharma@samyak.com Tue Feb 1 07:39:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50723B0A6D for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11872-07 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA1E3B119C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:09:07 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020118085702698 ; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:08:57 +0530 Message-ID: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:08:20 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2005 12:39:07.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[05482EF0:01C5085B] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Bhaskar Trivedi , GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Which Audio/Video Codec source codes are available freely X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 12:39:18 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, I want to know whether the source codes for all Audio & Video codecs = available under Linux for H.323 based communication. G.711, G.722, G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729 H.261, H.263 From the voxgratia FAQ I got to know that G.728 and G.729 are not = freely available. Please help. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello All,
 
   I want to know whether the = source=20 codes for all Audio & Video codecs available under = Linux=20 for H.323 based communication.
 
  G.711, G.722,=20 G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729
  H.261, H.263
 
 From the voxgratia FAQ I got to = know that=20 G.728 and G.729 are not freely available.
 
Please help.
 
Thanks and regards,
Ashutosh = Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0-- From craigs@postincrement.com Tue Feb 1 15:18:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CD83B12AF for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08921-02 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344053B141C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.13] (rapido.southeren.com [10.0.2.13]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j11KHnxB016004; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:17:50 +1100 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:17:52 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: "asharma" , , "Bhaskar Trivedi" , "GnomeMeeting mailing list" In-Reply-To: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> Message-Id: <20050202071435.837F.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [OpenH323]Which Audio/Video Codec source codes are available freely X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:18:13 -0000 On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:08:20 +0530 "asharma" wrote: > Hello All, > > I want to know whether the source codes for all Audio & Video codecs available under Linux for H.323 based communication. > > G.711, G.722, G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729 > H.261, H.263 > > From the voxgratia FAQ I got to know that G.728 and G.729 are not freely available. The Vox Gratia FAQ does not mention G.728. But here is a general overview of the state of each of these codecs: G.711 - available in OpenH323 G.722 - available in OpenH323 G.723 - now G.726. Available in OpenH323 G.723.1 - patented G.728 = patented G.729 = patented H.261 - available in OpenH323 H.263 - Patent status uncertain. Available in OpenH323. Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 2 09:50:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1343B14D5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:50:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22369-10 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:49:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273EA3B09EE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:49:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:20:23 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020220202204198 ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:20:23 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: openh323@openh323.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:19:53 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2005 14:50:23.0703 (UTC) FILETIME=[865CA670:01C50936] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:50:01 -0000 Hi all, I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I tried "make both" then I got the following error:- //////////// g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constr uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, from main.cxx:94: /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or directory /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or directory main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, PConfigPage*)': main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 ////////// In main.cxx the line no 570 is as follows:- SetCapability(0, 0, new H323_GSM0610Capability); Now when I tried to comment out that and again did the same task then I got the following erroneous trace:- ///////// g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constr uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, from main.cxx:94: /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or directory /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or directory make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 //////// Please help. Thanks and Regards, A. Sharma From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 2 09:52:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CDE3B1559 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22688-06 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2053B154C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D9312A62 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:53:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:52:19 +0100 Message-Id: <1107355939.3317.81.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:52:23 -0000 Hi, Sorry but a compilation error regarding opengk is off-topic for the GnomeMeeting mailing list. Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 20:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. > > First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I > tried "make both" then I got the following error:- > > //////////// > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl > ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os > -felide-constr > uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > from main.cxx:94: > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, > PConfigPage*)': > main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > > ////////// > > In main.cxx the line no 570 is as follows:- > > SetCapability(0, 0, new H323_GSM0610Capability); > > Now when I tried to comment out that and again did the same task then I > got the following erroneous trace:- > > ///////// > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constr uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > from main.cxx:94: > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > //////// > > Please help. > Thanks and Regards, > A. Sharma > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 10:26:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F5D3B158A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:26:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24607-09 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:26:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08943B1587 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:26:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwMOo-0001vl-1p for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:26:34 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwMOm-0008WF-6M for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:26:32 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:26:32 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:26:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1107357991.5083.6.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:26:38 -0000 --=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ashutosh, > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 looks like a broken or incomplete Qt installation to me.. Just my 2 Ct. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAPEnvdkzt4X+wX8RAhdqAJ9ciGnCH48TbwH995/u/nm3aPmR9gCeI/w7 13vfB1AjRx0GjPkXfFUW8+U= =OQYh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 11:52:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5433B0C18 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30333-05 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.33]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA3F63B096C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 16:52:44 -0000 From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:52:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:52:48 -0000 Hi guys I'm trying to build GM Opal and grabbed basically all involved packages from http://snapshots.seconix.com/cvs/ i.e. gnomemeeting-opal, opal, openh323 and pwlib. Unfortunately, I have trouble building pwlib, the make run seems to build only parts and the install fails halfway through. My configure is pretty simple: ./configure --prefix=/opt/opal --enable-plugins Do I need to set extra options? Or actually another pwlib version, since GM seems to require 1.8.3 while that tgz identifies itself as 1.8.4 ? Thanks, Bruno. From lurch@gmx.li Wed Feb 2 12:25:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62523B0812 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00659-06 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A613B0ABF for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IBA00CXSOEF3S@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j12HPQGL011055 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:26 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 12275 invoked from network); Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:25:25 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:25:25 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:18 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk In-reply-to: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502021825.24416.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:25:30 -0000 --nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 15:49 schrieb Ashutosh Sharma: > Hi all, > > I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. > > First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I > tried "make both" then I got the following error:- > > //////////// > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl > ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os > -felide-constr > uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > from main.cxx:94: > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, > PConfigPage*)': > main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 I think you did something really stupid - make could not find gsmcodec.h, s= o=20 you copied it from somewhere on your disk? The gsmcodec.h which you have in /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/ is from= =20 qtopia! Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=C3=BCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAQ0Eb39KPYz+qlMRAuYUAKCGHQWQcQ3lZKx5pZOt3B8cUBXhEQCgk3A1 +jaOhOeJVHbI4QChCNummrs= =Sr+n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB-- From kk_konrad@gmx.at Wed Feb 2 12:55:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDB63B0B5A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:55:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02503-04 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:55:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EB913B0689 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:55:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Feb 2005 17:55:31 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 02 Feb 2005 18:55:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:55:23 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Message-ID: <20050202175523.GA16172localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:55:35 -0000 Hi, I am running against a wall with netmeeting 3.01 on XP + meetspeex <-> gnomemeeting-1.2.0 on Fedora FC3: I am unable to get both sides to use at least one of the low bandwidth speex codecs (i already played a lot around with meetspeex rearranging/enabling/disabling codecs). gnomemeeting happily transmits to netmeeting using speexw 8kHz (audio gets actually through), but netmeeting transmit either uses the uncompressed G711 codecs (too much bandwidth), MS-GSM if I enable it (bad audio quality) or nothing if I am allowing only speex at gmomemeeting. (speexw and all others tried) Is there anybody who has solved the puzzle or is it unsolvable? I am interested in audio only at the moment but this can change easily :-) Regards, Konrad PS: I second the question about the gnomemeeting on windows status question. Is there anything to start with? What are the major problems expected? PPS: anybody tried getting a DV camcorder (ieee1394) to work with gnomemeeting? From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 13:55:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C7D3B0B94 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:55:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06103-01 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:55:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8953B07A7 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:55:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwPey-0004vC-VB for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:55:29 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwPew-00024B-Dn for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:55:26 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:55:26 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:55:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:55:34 -0000 --=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruno, > I'm trying to build GM Opal and grabbed basically all involved packages > from http://snapshots.seconix.com/cvs/ > i.e. gnomemeeting-opal, opal, openh323 and pwlib. >=20 > Unfortunately, I have trouble building pwlib, the make run seems to > build only parts and the install fails halfway through. what errormsg are you encountering and what arch trying to build on? Amd64 is known to need CFLAGS=3D"-fPIC -DPIC" to compile ok (but the errormsg would tell you that anyway). --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCASIevdkzt4X+wX8RAkN0AJ4xtNVZao0hW5ukkC5FCT5oToapnQCdGmZQ FnFvYgvBMgbuhYWI4SppFSM= =CgrQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 14:22:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99D73B0C8A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:22:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07442-09 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:22:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02F453B0CE2 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:22:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 19:22:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:22:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:22:05 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 19:55 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > what errormsg are you encountering and what arch trying to build on? > Amd64 is known to need CFLAGS="-fPIC -DPIC" to compile ok (but the > errormsg would tell you that anyway). > Fedora Core 3 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 #1 Thu Nov 18 15:10:10 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux FYI: I build other pwlib versions (like Janus for asterisk) on the same machine without problems. Seems the plugins configure goes wrong the whole way. No sound support detected although e.g. OSS support and sys/soundcard.h are available: configure: configuring in plugins configure: running /bin/sh './configure' --prefix=/opt/opal '--prefix=/opt/opal' '--enable-plugins' --cache-file=/dev/null --srcdir=. checking for g++... g++ checking for C++ compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes Plugin source directory is /home/bruno/dl/voip/opal/pwlib/plugins checking sys/soundcard.h usability... no checking sys/soundcard.h presence... no checking for sys/soundcard.h... no checking for OSS sound support... no checking machine/ioctl_meteor.h usability... no checking machine/ioctl_meteor.h presence... no checking for machine/ioctl_meteor.h... no checking i386/ioctl_meteor.h usability... no checking i386/ioctl_meteor.h presence... no checking for i386/ioctl_meteor.h... no checking dev/ic/bt8xx.h usability... no checking dev/ic/bt8xx.h presence... no checking for dev/ic/bt8xx.h... no checking for BSD video support... no checking libavc1394/avc1394.h usability... no checking libavc1394/avc1394.h presence... no checking for libavc1394/avc1394.h... no checking libdv/dv.h usability... no checking libdv/dv.h presence... no checking for libdv/dv.h... no checking libraw1394/raw1394.h usability... no checking libraw1394/raw1394.h presence... no checking for libraw1394/raw1394.h... no checking for IEEE1394/AVC video support... no configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating vidinput_dc/Makefile Make then goes OK, but make install gives ( for dir in /opt/opal/lib \ /opt/opal/include/ptlib \ /opt/opal/include/ptlib/unix/ptlib \ /opt/opal/include/ptclib \ /opt/opal/share/pwlib/make ; \ do mkdir -p $dir ; chmod 755 $dir ; \ done ) /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 /opt/opal/lib (cd /opt/opal/lib ; \ rm -f libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8 ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8 \ ) (cd /opt/opal/lib ; \ rm -f libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1 ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1 \ ) (cd /opt/opal/lib ; \ rm -f libpt_linux_x86_r.so ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 libpt_linux_x86_r.so \ ) (cd /opt/opal/lib; \ rm -f libpt.so ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so libpt.so \ ) cd plugins/pwlib/device/ ; \ ( for dir in ./* ;\ do mkdir -p /opt/opal/lib/pwlib/devices/$dir ; \ chmod 755 /opt/opal/lib/pwlib/devices/$dir ; \ (for fn in ./$dir/*.so ; \ do /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $fn /opt/opal/lib/pwlib/devices/$dir; \ done ); \ done ) /bin/sh: line 0: cd: plugins/pwlib/device/: No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././a.out/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ChangeLog/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ChangeLog.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.guess/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.log/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.status/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.sub/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././configure/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././configure.ac/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././configure.exe/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././CVS/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././History.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././include/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././install-sh/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././make/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././Makefile/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././Makefile.in/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././mpl-1.0.htm/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././msvc6_upgrade.bat/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././plugins/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlibce.vcp/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlibce.vcw/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib_cfg.dxy/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.dsw/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.dxx/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.dxy/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.mak/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.sln/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.vcp/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.wpj/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.wsp/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ReadMe_QOS.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ReadMe.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././README_VXWORKS.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././samples/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././src/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././tools/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././version.h/*.so': Not a directory make: *** [install] Error 1 Regards, Bruno. From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 14:28:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBBF3B1589 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:28:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07905-05 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:28:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937DE3B15C8 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:27:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwQ9t-0005VR-Kz for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:25 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwQ9r-0002LJ-Pb for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:23 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:27:23 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:28:34 -0000 --=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruno, > /bin/sh: line 0: cd: plugins/pwlib/device/: No such file or directory yes, that's a bug i also encountered. Craig so far has no "fix" for this. Will keep you posted once this is resolved. Until then try to compile without plugins. ;) --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBCASmbvdkzt4X+wX8RAitZAJ4lS4QTtLZogYRyjBieKIWhR4mFlQCUD9ZP +/IP+88C0ubHh1ypp8tWUw== =kUDY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 14:51:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6C73B0955 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:51:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09576-09 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:51:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.36]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 547EB3B0E50 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:51:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 19:51:47 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:51:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1107373910.3826.34.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:51:50 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:27 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > yes, that's a bug i also encountered. Craig so far has no "fix" for > this. Will keep you posted once this is resolved. Until then try to > compile without plugins. ;) Alrighty. Thanks, Bruno. From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 15:17:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328063B0BDE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11140-05 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A88413B09D1 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 20:17:23 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:17:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:17:25 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:27 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > yes, that's a bug i also encountered. Craig so far has no "fix" for > this. Will keep you posted once this is resolved. Until then try to > compile without plugins. ;) OK, I'm giving up. GM doesn't configure through because pwlib without plugins still references plugin symbols. E.g. with x.c: int main() {} and gcc -o x x.c -L/opt/opal/lib -lpt I get /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPluginsProviding(PString const&) const' /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetServiceDescriptor(PString const&, PString const&)' /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPluginManager()' /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::RegisterService(PString const&, PString const&, PPluginServiceDescriptor*)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Bye for now, Bruno. From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 15:26:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55F03B15E2 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:26:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11868-02 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:26:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7533B15DE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:26:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwR4m-0006Fy-FZ for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:12 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwR4k-0002Zx-Bu for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:10 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:10 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:10 +0100 Message-Id: <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:26:16 -0000 --=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruno, > I get > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPlugin= sProviding(PString const&) const' > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetServic= eDescriptor(PString const&, PString const&)' > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPlugin= Manager()' > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::RegisterS= ervice(PString const&, PString const&, PPluginServiceDescriptor*)' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status that's most probably Damien's missing opal/pwlib patch. There is still one patch missing which he does reckon is needed for GM2CVS which isn't yet upstream for some reasons. Maybe he can post it on the gm-dev mailinglist or tell us when this'll hit upstream. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCATdivdkzt4X+wX8RArWlAJ4uWDyH0Eb/phjWQpkt1qJSYvb3jQCfev6Y 0OQx+h6DTy4rT6yBIEZp910= =PDgE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 15:43:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF873B15F6 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:43:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13474-10 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:43:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A304D3B15EE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:43:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 20:43:16 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:43:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:43:18 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:26 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > that's most probably Damien's missing opal/pwlib patch. There is still > one patch missing which he does reckon is needed for GM2CVS which isn't > yet upstream for some reasons. Maybe he can post it on the gm-dev > mailinglist or tell us when this'll hit upstream. OK, I'll watch out for it or either try the next snapshots coming. Thanks a lot for your clarifications. Regards, Bruno. PS: Just fyi, one reason I'm trying this is SIP support. Since I've been fiddling with asterisk for two months right now and using various softphones on the way, I like to use GM because it's been best, regarding robustness, sound quality and latency. Also, one regular question on the * users list is which softphone to use, and I myself do recommend GM but people seem to prefer SIP for various reasons (registration/gatekeeper hassle, etc). Anyway, I know it's early but I thought I'd give it a shot ... :) From johannes@vanster.nu Wed Feb 2 21:26:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C653B06BE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30659-04 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail2.space2u.com (mail2.space2u.com [62.20.1.161]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF933B06BC for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [83.226.47.14] (c-0e2fe253.234-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.226.47.14]) by mail2.space2u.com (8.13.3/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j132QoO0028277 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:26:52 +0100 Message-ID: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 03:26:49 +0100 From: Johannes User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] YDL, BT and Skype X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:26:58 -0000 Hi! I have some small questions before starting to use GnomeMeeting: Is there a way for a non-linux-experienced user such as myself to install it on YellowDogLinux? Does GnomeMeeting work with Bluetooth Headsets? Can one call Skype Users/Log onto Skype accounts? What about AIMs? y.c. Johannes Sweden From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 2 23:40:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5685D3B077D for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03461-07 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF43B08F9 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:11:00 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020310105904643 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:10:59 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107357991.5083.6.camel@ganymede> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> <1107357991.5083.6.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1107405633.4041.4.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:10:33 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2005 04:41:00.0640 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F7DBE00:01C509AA] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:40:33 -0000 Well thanks for the reply, But I got able to correct the mistake... What I did that I included the path to qconfig.h in the command itself and it did work. But the problem was that that I had to run the two commands separately for making release and debug exes. Can anyone suggest me the proper way because I didn't find any thing related to include files in the Makefile and also I had to comment out the GSMCodecCapability Line because it was giving me the unreference statement. Well when I was done with the complete installation, I tried http://:1719 which gave me the property page but it asked me for the Username and Password. I tried admin/secret but in vain. Can you please tell me about the authentication problem. THanks and Regards, Ashutosh On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:56, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Ashutosh, > > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > > directory > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > > directory > > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > looks like a broken or incomplete Qt installation to me.. > > Just my 2 Ct. From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 2 23:44:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2340B3B066A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:44:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03628-10 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:44:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245813B08FA for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:44:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:14:35 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020310143404646 ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:14:35 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk From: Ashutosh Sharma To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502021825.24416.lurch@gmx.li> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> <200502021825.24416.lurch@gmx.li> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1107405848.4041.7.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:14:08 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2005 04:44:35.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[0FA8DE70:01C509AB] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:44:09 -0000 Hi, Well I didn't do anything like that. I was just doing the normal compilation process. But I was able to resolve the prob by including the path containing qconfig.h on the command line. But I don't know but I had to comment out the GSMCodec Line in the main.cxx otherwise it was not able to find the definition of that. REgards, Ashutosh On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 22:55, Stefan Bruens wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 15:49 schrieb Ashutosh Sharma: > > Hi all, > > > > I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. > > > > First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I > > tried "make both" then I got the following error:- > > > > //////////// > > > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl > > ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os > > -felide-constr > > uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > > from main.cxx:94: > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > > directory > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > > directory > > main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, > > PConfigPage*)': > > main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token > > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > I think you did something really stupid - make could not find gsmcodec.h, so > you copied it from somewhere on your disk? > > The gsmcodec.h which you have in /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/ is from > qtopia! > > Greetings, > > Stefan From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 03:24:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A723C3B0976 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:24:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13314-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:24:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFEB3B06AF for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:24:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81FE18C3D for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:25:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:24:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1107419058.3325.8.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:24:21 -0000 Hi, I don't think your error is due to my missing patch, but plugins are currently broken for some reason in pwlib. I will make an announce here when I consider GM Opal as usable :) Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 21:43 +0100, Bruno Hertz a écrit : > On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:26 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > > > that's most probably Damien's missing opal/pwlib patch. There is still > > one patch missing which he does reckon is needed for GM2CVS which isn't > > yet upstream for some reasons. Maybe he can post it on the gm-dev > > mailinglist or tell us when this'll hit upstream. > > OK, I'll watch out for it or either try the next snapshots coming. > Thanks a lot for your clarifications. > > Regards, Bruno. > > PS: Just fyi, one reason I'm trying this is SIP support. Since I've > been fiddling with asterisk for two months right now and using various > softphones on the way, I like to use GM because it's been best, > regarding robustness, sound quality and latency. Also, one regular > question on the * users list is which softphone to use, and I myself > do recommend GM but people seem to prefer SIP for various reasons > (registration/gatekeeper hassle, etc). Anyway, I know it's early but > I thought I'd give it a shot ... :) > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 03:25:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1BF3B06AF for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:25:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13499-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:25:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0D53B0819 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FA818C3D for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:27:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050202175523.GA16172localhost> References: <20050202175523.GA16172localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:25:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:25:58 -0000 Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 18:55 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > Hi, > > I am running against a wall with netmeeting 3.01 on XP + > meetspeex <-> gnomemeeting-1.2.0 on Fedora FC3: > > I am unable to get both sides to use at least one of > the low bandwidth speex codecs (i already played a lot > around with meetspeex rearranging/enabling/disabling codecs). > > gnomemeeting happily transmits to netmeeting using speexw 8kHz > (audio gets actually through), but netmeeting transmit either uses the > uncompressed G711 codecs (too much bandwidth), MS-GSM if I > enable it (bad audio quality) or nothing if I am allowing > only speex at gmomemeeting. (speexw and all others tried) > > Is there anybody who has solved the puzzle or is it > unsolvable? I am interested in audio only at the moment but > this can change easily :-) Have you checked the FAQ on voxgratia.org? they have a short howto. I would say that Speex is not installed correctly on the netmeeting side. > > Regards, > > Konrad > > PS: I second the question about the gnomemeeting on windows > status question. Is there anything to start with? > Unfortunately not... > What are the major problems expected? > > A very long compilation time. Except that, it should work. > PPS: anybody tried getting a DV camcorder (ieee1394) to > work with gnomemeeting? It is supposed to work :) > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 03:27:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3A63B07ED for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:27:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13664-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A593B06D1 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED5121AE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:29:12 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] YDL, BT and Skype From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> References: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:27:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1107419263.3325.14.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:27:45 -0000 Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 03:26 +0100, Johannes a écrit : > Hi! > I have some small questions before starting to use GnomeMeeting: > > Is there a way for a non-linux-experienced user such as myself to > install it on YellowDogLinux? > It should ship with the YDL installation CD. From there, you can install it as any other software on YDL, using RPM (I think). > Does GnomeMeeting work with Bluetooth Headsets? If the Bluetooth headset works with Linux, yes, it will work. > > Can one call Skype Users/Log onto Skype accounts? What about AIMs? > That's impossible, Skype is using a proprietary protocol. GnomeMeeting is currently compatible with any H.323 software. Next release will also be compatible with SIP software (including Windows Messenger, not MSN Messenger). > y.c. > Johannes > Sweden > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Thu Feb 3 04:19:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927383B0C74 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 04:19:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16719-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 04:19:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5A03B0996 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 04:19:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwd9I-00036v-9f for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:19:40 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwd9G-0003La-EG for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:19:38 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:19:39 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> References: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:19:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1107422378.5615.5.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] YDL, BT and Skype Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:19:57 -0000 --=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Johannes, > Does GnomeMeeting work with Bluetooth Headsets? just to add some small note to limit the expextations. Last time I tried the sampling was at 8kHz and thus no great audio quality. Maybe BlueZ folks have fixed this in the meantime, but don't *expect* miracles, only be happy when they occur. ;) --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAeyqvdkzt4X+wX8RApaBAJ91nPYNVzPE90vYKRfJWfp7skSzBACdEYnO P7Sti1UoQexn2fHMFLKCZeg= =nQND -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm-- From kk_konrad@gmx.at Thu Feb 3 05:31:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA42E3B0A91 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:31:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20483-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:31:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 690153B0764 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:31:00 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2005 10:30:57 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2005 11:30:57 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:30:54 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050203103000.GA25620localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:31:02 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:25:54AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 18:55 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I am running against a wall with netmeeting 3.01 on XP + > > meetspeex <-> gnomemeeting-1.2.0 on Fedora FC3: > > > [...deleted...] > > Have you checked the FAQ on voxgratia.org? they have a short howto. I > would say that Speex is not installed correctly on the netmeeting side. I read several times over the FAQ's and also the instructions on the speexw site (link from gnomemeeting.org's FAQ). It must be some obscure detail - I tried netmeeting on Win2000 and XP and it is always the same: NM receives speexw 8khz but refuses to use it on transmit. The most I could get from NM was MS-GSM but the sound was horrible (background noise like 'grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr' all the time besides the usual GSM artifacts) one detail: the codecs listed by meetspeex at bottom do show up in netmeetings drop down codec list. [....] > > > PPS: anybody tried getting a DV camcorder (ieee1394) to > > work with gnomemeeting? > > It is supposed to work :) I confess I did not even try since the 1394 device does not show up as a video4linux device. Did you mean 'work out of the box'? (will give it a try this evening anyways :) Perhaps there is some hack required (using the v4l loopback device)? The NM/GM speex issue is puzzling me most at the moment - it is difficult to get everybody using linux. An additional question: (I am almost totally ignorant about SIP) is it possible to have two SIP devices communicate to each other w/o having to use such stuff like registrar etc (as it is possible now with NM/gnomemeeting by simply entering IP address to connect? (assuming they are on the same network, no NAT etc) Regards, Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 05:40:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6613B0928 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:40:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21039-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:40:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5883B0926 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:40:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FEA183D4 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:42:04 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050203103000.GA25620localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <20050203103000.GA25620localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:40:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:40:38 -0000 Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > I read several times over the FAQ's and also the instructions on the > speexw site (link from gnomemeeting.org's FAQ). It must be some obscure > detail - I tried netmeeting on Win2000 and XP and it is always the same: > NM receives speexw 8khz but refuses to use it on transmit. The most I > could get from NM was MS-GSM but the sound was horrible > (background noise like 'grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr' all the time besides the > usual GSM artifacts) > > one detail: the codecs listed by meetspeex at bottom do > show up in netmeetings drop down codec list. > I have no idea about this, perhaps you could try to contact them? > I confess I did not even try since the 1394 device does not show > up as a video4linux device. Did you mean 'work out of the box'? > (will give it a try this evening anyways :) Perhaps there is some > hack required (using the v4l loopback device)? > That is not a video4linux device. You have to install a separate plugin for this kind of camera (either the AVC or the DC one) > > The NM/GM speex issue is puzzling me most at the moment - it > is difficult to get everybody using linux. > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > An additional question: (I am almost totally ignorant about SIP) > > is it possible to have two SIP devices communicate to each other > w/o having to use such stuff like registrar etc (as it is possible > now with NM/gnomemeeting by simply entering IP address to connect? > (assuming they are on the same network, no NAT etc) > yes you can do that. > Regards, > > Konrad > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From brrhtz@yahoo.de Thu Feb 3 05:43:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A39F3B0BBE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:43:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21072-08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:43:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C38713B0A71 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:43:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2005 10:43:41 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107419058.3325.8.camel@golgoth01> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107419058.3325.8.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:43:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1107427424.3961.0.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:43:44 -0000 On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 09:24 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think your error is due to my missing patch, but plugins are > currently broken for some reason in pwlib. > > I will make an announce here when I consider GM Opal as usable :) > Thanks, Damien. I'll be looking for it. Regards, Bruno. From kk_konrad@gmx.at Thu Feb 3 12:48:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0E53B07E0 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:48:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12728-08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:48:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D59F53B0984 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:48:27 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2005 17:48:27 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2005 18:48:27 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:48:24 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050203174824.GA6094localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:48:32 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > ...... > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? Thanks for the pointer - I was not aware of it. Today it crashed only one time... speex seems to work ok. Greeetings, Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 13:44:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0963B11E9 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:44:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16493-04 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A83E3B0B8A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.119.16]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E9FAD94 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:45:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050203174824.GA6094localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <20050203174824.GA6094localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:44:24 +0100 Message-Id: <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:44:33 -0000 Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 18:48 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > ...... > > > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > > Thanks for the pointer - I was not aware of it. Today it crashed > only one time... speex seems to work ok. > What crashed one time? > Greeetings, > > Konrad > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From gnome-Gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org Thu Feb 3 16:28:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BB73B0A4A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:28:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27375-04 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:28:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6509A3B06EE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:28:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CwoVd-00068m-S5 for Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100 Received: from 217.129.99.175 ([217.129.99.175]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100 Received: from markhellman by 217.129.99.175 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org From: Mark Hellman Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:27:41 +0000 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.129.99.175 Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss X-MailScanner-From: gnome-gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:28:19 -0000 Steve wrote: > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > know you are busy volunteers... GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 packages still are not available... On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more popular... Mark From kk_konrad@gmx.at Thu Feb 3 16:42:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5A83B07E1 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28481-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FA693B0B45 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:20 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2005 21:42:19 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2005 22:42:19 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:42:16 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050203214216.GA9919localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:42:23 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:44:24PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 18:48 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > > > ...... > > > > > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > > > > Thanks for the pointer - I was not aware of it. Today it crashed > > only one time... speex seems to work ok. > > > > What crashed one time? MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the windows users. GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it does not happen frequently) Greetings, Konrad From kk@verfaction.de Thu Feb 3 16:44:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C893B0D4C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28651-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F2E3B0C84 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwom9-00036z-I9 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:44:33 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwom7-0006kt-MV for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:44:31 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:44:31 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:44:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1107467071.5615.40.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:44:49 -0000 --=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark, > Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... not sure where this critisizm is being helpful, but if you want to support GnomeMeeting then you should provide binaries to Damien (or me). --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAps/vdkzt4X+wX8RAsoFAJ4qk0TzumDnfm4YU/GS3PfCh1xkIQCfcgKK DspDAnsngcv4VQ4l9s2wplY= =hYXy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz-- From craigs@postincrement.com Thu Feb 3 16:51:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E67F3B172B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29114-02 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDFE3B17A3 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.13] (rapido.southeren.com [10.0.2.13]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j13LokxB024174; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:50:47 +1100 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:50:47 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: Mark Hellman , Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-Id: <20050204083608.C98B.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:51:33 -0000 On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:27:41 +0000 Mark Hellman wrote: > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > know you are busy volunteers... > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE > 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 > packages still are not available... > > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was > released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were > made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... Let's just think about what you are saying. Skype is a company with dozens of employees, that was founded by a guy who made millions out of the Internet boom a few years ago. The company has additional venture capital funding and continues to earn revenue through the Skype-out service. They have a closed protocol, and closed source client, and they have no published schedule so they are free to change what they want, when they want to do it. GnomeMeeting is created by a team of volunteers. The people who work on it get paid nothing, it earns no revenue for them, and has no funding from anyone, other than from the very pockets of the people who work on it. GnomeMeeting is constrained by being compatible with the millions of the H.323 (and soon SIP) terminals already deployed, as well as having to work with the Gnome release schedule, and the OpenH323 release schedule. So it is no suprise that Skype can roll out stuff faster than the GnomeMeeting team. Who-da thunk.... Look at it another way. Do you think that the people that work on GnomeMeeting don't know what you are saying? Don't you think it is infinitely more frustrating for them than it could ever be for you? If you want to help address this problem, then step up to the plate and offer to create some Suse packages yourself. Or offer to test them if someone else does. But please don't make statements like this. At best, you are declaring yourself an insensitive clod. At worst, you are demotivating the very people who could solve the problem. Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 16:51:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921C93B177B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29125-03 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FA63B1765 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from 16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be (16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.119.16]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ED511BB9 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:52:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050203214216.GA9919localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <20050203214216.GA9919localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:51:18 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:51:37 -0000 Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > windows users. > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > does not happen frequently) > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 16:56:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477C13B0E85 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29479-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDF73B0F6B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from 16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be (16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.119.16]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01BDCC03 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:57:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:56:25 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:56:26 -0000 Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:27, Mark Hellman a écrit : > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > know you are busy volunteers... > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE > 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 > packages still are not available... > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was > released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were > made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... > I shouldn't answer to such a lame email, but I will do it. We are all volunteers doing this in our spare time. If nobody is doing a SuSE 9.2 package for GnomeMeeting, don't count on me to install SuSE and create one except if you pay me. Then I might consider doing this during the night (did I forget to mention I have a paid job during the day and that I'm coding on GnomeMeeting only in my spare time?) We have the same problem with RedHat. They do not make packages for us. When 1.2.1 is released I will remove from the website the distributions from which we get no help. Ah well, and you have the sources, so you can compile yourself. Try to do this with Skype. I'm getting sick of Open Source and of e-mails like this one. I have to refrain from cancelling the whole big thing and getting a life. Good night, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From franz@iptelenet.com Thu Feb 3 17:07:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0DA3B178A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30633-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.iptelenet.com (sql.iptelenet.com [82.133.46.42]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E7E3B1783 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from PortegeXP by iptelenet.com (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000042636.msg for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:07:04 +0000 Message-ID: <036201c50a3c$acb4c210$3200a8c0@PortegeXP> From: "Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet)" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:06:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Authenticated-Sender: franz@iptelenet.com X-Spam-Processed: sql.iptelenet.com, Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:07:04 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.133.46.45 X-Return-Path: franz@iptelenet.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Franz J Ehrengruber \(iptelenet\)" , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:07:51 -0000 > I'm getting sick of Open Source and of e-mails like this one. I > have to refrain from cancelling the whole big thing and getting > a life. Damien, I'm sure you read Craig's response by now, regarding Skype and not surprisingly hit the neil on the head. In the long term it pays off to stick to standards. Thanks for your contribution to the open source commubity. Regards, Franz. From gnome-Gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org Thu Feb 3 19:51:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329443B1659 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:51:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07022-03 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:51:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38663B14C9 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:51:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CwrgB-0005jt-PG for Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:35 +0100 Received: from bsn-77-212-200.dsl.siol.net ([193.77.212.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:35 +0100 Received: from i_p_a_u_l by bsn-77-212-200.dsl.siol.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org From: Paul Ionescu Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:51:05 +0100 Lines: 8 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bsn-77-212-200.dsl.siol.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: gnome-gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:51:47 -0000 Hi, I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? Does it support HAL too ? Thx, From martin.lohre@web.de Thu Feb 3 20:17:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C6C3B15E1 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:17:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08948-07 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:17:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp07.web.de (smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F27C3B1773 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:17:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from [62.245.160.43] (helo=[192.168.0.72]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE 4.103 #192) id 1Cws6Z-00069c-00 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:17:52 +0100 From: Martin Lohre To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:16:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> In-Reply-To: <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502040216.08937.martin.lohre@web.de> Sender: martin.lohre@web.de X-Sender: martin.lohre@web.de X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:17:54 -0000 --nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Damien, you are doing a great job here. Especially if considering that you are not= =20 doing it for money and in your spare time. As well as the other contributor= s. So thanks for writing this program, it is a nice pice of SW. Sometimes some people are just not the brightest ones. So, do not worry abo= ut=20 them and what they say, that would be just a wast of time. Martin Am Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 22:56 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Le jeu 03/02/2005 =E0 22:27, Mark Hellman a =E9crit : > > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > > know you are busy volunteers... > > > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, > > SuSE 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE > > 9.2 packages still are not available... > > > > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it > > was released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary > > were made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and mo= re > > popular... > > I shouldn't answer to such a lame email, but I will do it. > > We are all volunteers doing this in our spare time. If nobody is doing a > SuSE 9.2 package for GnomeMeeting, don't count on me to install SuSE and > create one except if you pay me. Then I might consider doing this during > the night (did I forget to mention I have a paid job during the day and > that I'm coding on GnomeMeeting only in my spare time?) > > We have the same problem with RedHat. They do not make packages for us. > When 1.2.1 is released I will remove from the website the distributions > from which we get no help. > > Ah well, and you have the sources, so you can compile yourself. Try to > do this with Skype. > > I'm getting sick of Open Source and of e-mails like this one. I have to > refrain from cancelling the whole big thing and getting a life. > > Good night, =2D-=20 Martin Lohre Konrad-Adenauer-Str. 16 D-85221 Dachau Tel.: +49-8131-617868 =46ax : +49-8131-617869 Mob.: +49-163-7130568 --nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAszYeBGwihagJ6ERAovkAJ4+hXa34XBsOMFX7//gJlCJORDKXwCgiY64 H2NpEzn1IsPHyP/OS+cCeIQ= =yYqe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz-- From conrad_b@yahoo.com Thu Feb 3 20:34:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49883B000B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09471-08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from web41521.mail.yahoo.com (web41521.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.94.128]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7D2B3B007F for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:18 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 91780 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2005 01:34:18 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=KQIlAk7sTLmWaMMTZmSw6rgkvsncjKnLsyAxap6+cvdxg+jiM9vqtyIoD6m5QVSFWdZd4UdPPX4ilDkP8jm6zR64Gx7qDsjAptVo53lB0Uhcg3gOP1fXmf7V8As4UaPEF+pgRIUfdOvKlJxImbdgnBO+Qm+hTn1oTqDFHn9AXOc= ; Message-ID: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.81.82.81] by web41521.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:34:18 CET Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:34:18 +0100 (CET) From: Conrad Beckert Subject: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:34:20 -0000 >>Try myphone.sourceforge.net?<< Well, I've installed it a while on my mother's machine - it happend to be a desaster since it caused the WinME to crash so frequently that I wasn't even able to vnc to the machine to kick it off. (MyPhone puts itself into autostart) Since then I'm to blame for each and every Windows crash on her machine :-) I contacted the author of MyPhone- he admitted some memory leak but didn't submit a patch or new version. A pity since it's a nice program. Since then I'm sticking to good old OpenPhone for my Windows buddies. (http://www.openh323.org) OpenPhone and the website too have some dark green patina but at least it works for all of us. (and nobody is trying to convince me to use Yahoo or even MSN instead of Gnomemeeting) Neosmt http://www.neosmt.com) could be an alternative. It comes with a Jabber client - with some obviously proprietary extensions for signalling. But it works perfectly without the IM (Tools/Media panel). To get into contact with Gnomemeeting, this is the only way. Neither gatekeeper settings nor the Kopete plugin work over the IM. Neither does a Jabber introduced H323 connection through (at least my) NAT. But cool, Speex works. Any other ideas for the Windows crowds? Conrad --- Damien Sandras schrieb: > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl > a écrit : > > > > > I read several times over the FAQ's and also the > instructions on the > > speexw site (link from gnomemeeting.org's FAQ). It > must be some obscure > > detail - I tried netmeeting on Win2000 and XP and > it is always the same: > > NM receives speexw 8khz but refuses to use it on > transmit. The most I > > could get from NM was MS-GSM but the sound was > horrible > > (background noise like 'grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr' all > the time besides the > > usual GSM artifacts) > > > > one detail: the codecs listed by meetspeex at > bottom do > > show up in netmeetings drop down codec list. > > > > I have no idea about this, perhaps you could try to > contact them? > > > I confess I did not even try since the 1394 device > does not show > > up as a video4linux device. Did you mean 'work out > of the box'? > > (will give it a try this evening anyways :) > Perhaps there is some > > hack required (using the v4l loopback device)? > > > > That is not a video4linux device. You have to > install a separate plugin > for this kind of camera (either the AVC or the DC > one) > > > > > The NM/GM speex issue is puzzling me most at the > moment - it > > is difficult to get everybody using linux. > > > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > > > An additional question: (I am almost totally > ignorant about SIP) > > > > is it possible to have two SIP devices > communicate to each other > > w/o having to use such stuff like registrar etc > (as it is possible > > now with NM/gnomemeeting by simply entering IP > address to connect? > > (assuming they are on the same network, no NAT > etc) > > > > yes you can do that. > > > > Regards, > > > > Konrad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- > _ Damien Sandras > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > v_/_ H.323 phone : > callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 03:11:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFFE3B1881 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:11:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30255-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:11:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62453B094D for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:11:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E871763D; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:13:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:11:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1107504691.3326.1.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: jpuydt@free.fr X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:11:36 -0000 Hello, There is no HAL support yet even though we are planning to work on that too (after the SIP port is complete). The DBUS component permits you to start and stop calls and to get various information about the current status. Julien can certainly tell more about it than me as he wrote that part. Our purpose is to permit integration with instant messengers, but it is still in its early stages. Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 01:51 +0100, Paul Ionescu a écrit : > Hi, > > I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? > Does it support HAL too ? > > > Thx, > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From miguelrp@gmail.com Fri Feb 4 03:14:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547503B18C2 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:14:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30516-09 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:14:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.249]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACB03B189A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:13:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so58499cwc for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=AnAWMqvTk2FofXDoIrCdwWNE6LR0ayrRSdBP2mtOriIiQVu8lZsdFt+71ZQGtiCT632Ez/GkmOWUjQS+uF0nh5HnmJeE2Dej0mSL6F87zIc1ZXGoSy9LjIB5IDBbXy+lYWNUGqRbiSXC/A5Qc1d1LTI3iVqn69UYzcK2iPOc0Aw= Received: by 10.11.99.36 with SMTP id w36mr101242cwb; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.11.99.27 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:13:27 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Rodr=EDguez_P=E9rez?= To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Rodr=EDguez_P=E9rez?= , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:14:38 -0000 No it doesn't. It would be could to make write pwlib plugins that autodetect devices based on hal information. But AFAIK there's still no reliable way in hal to detect v4l or sound decives. On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:51:05 +0100, Paul Ionescu wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? > Does it support HAL too ? > > Thx, > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 03:15:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C674A3B181B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:15:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30635-03 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:15:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214753B18BD for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:14:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7651763D for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:16:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:14:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1107504894.3326.5.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:15:43 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 02:34 +0100, Conrad Beckert a écrit : > >>Try myphone.sourceforge.net?<< > Well, I've installed it a while on my mother's machine > - it happend to be a desaster since it caused the > WinME to crash so frequently that I wasn't even able > to vnc to the machine to kick it off. (MyPhone puts > itself into autostart) Since then I'm to blame for > each and every Windows crash on her machine :-) > > I contacted the author of MyPhone- he admitted some > memory leak but didn't submit a patch or new version. > A pity since it's a nice program. > > Since then I'm sticking to good old OpenPhone for my > Windows buddies. (http://www.openh323.org) OpenPhone > and the website too have some dark green patina but at > least it works for all of us. (and nobody is trying to > convince me to use Yahoo or even MSN instead of > Gnomemeeting) > > Neosmt http://www.neosmt.com) could be an alternative. > It comes with a Jabber client - with some obviously > proprietary extensions for signalling. > > But it works perfectly without the IM (Tools/Media > panel). > > To get into contact with Gnomemeeting, this is the > only way. Neither gatekeeper settings nor the Kopete > plugin work over the IM. Neither does a Jabber > introduced H323 connection through (at least my) NAT. > > But cool, Speex works. > > Any other ideas for the Windows crowds? Find some talented and motivated hacker who can finish the windows port. I think that would be the easiest. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From alricococo@msn.com Fri Feb 4 03:16:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328A93B18A6 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:16:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30640-07 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:16:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay11-f12.bay11.hotmail.com [64.4.39.12]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1797D3B18C2 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:15:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:15:02 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 130.231.240.27 by by11fd.bay11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:14:03 GMT X-Originating-IP: [130.231.240.27] X-Originating-Email: [alricococo@msn.com] X-Sender: alricococo@msn.com From: "Jon Casasempere" To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:14:03 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2005 08:15:02.0703 (UTC) FILETIME=[A05ECBF0:01C50A91] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem with Video Tx quality X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:16:07 -0000 Hi!! I´ve just run my Gnomemeeting aplication and I have been able to make the video transmition betwen 2 laptops in a wireless LAN. The problem is that I can see the video but the quality is very bad. I think it´s not a problem with the webcam because bafore making the call the video quality is very good, but when the call is stablished I almost can´t see my shape in a green shadow. I have been changing the preference transmition setting but it´s not comming better. Could someone tell what can be the problem? Thank you in advance Jon Casasempere From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 03:41:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938B03B18AC for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:41:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32355-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975663B18B3 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D69F18644 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:43:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem with Video Tx quality From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:41:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1107506500.3326.21.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:41:42 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:14 +0100, Jon Casasempere a écrit : > Hi!! > > I´ve just run my Gnomemeeting aplication and I have been able to make the > video transmition betwen 2 laptops in a wireless LAN. The problem is that I > can see the video but the quality is very bad. I think it´s not a problem > with the webcam because bafore making the call the video quality is very > good, but when the call is stablished I almost can´t see my shape in a green > shadow. I have been changing the preference transmition setting but it´s not > comming better. > > Could someone tell what can be the problem? > > Thank you in advance > Can you upload a screenshot somewhere of the quality before transmission and after? Also, wouldn't you be using a Quickcam camera? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk Fri Feb 4 04:16:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAF63B1838 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 04:16:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02416-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 04:16:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.77]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DE553B1922 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 04:16:56 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 95471 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2005 09:16:56 -0000 Message-ID: <20050204091656.95469.qmail@web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [212.240.207.212] by web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:16:55 GMT Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:16:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Steve To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:16:59 -0000 Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, time-wasting arguments about one product/approach over another! I was just making a polite enquiry about whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. No promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone point me at some instructions? Steve Dundee, UK From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 05:25:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1183B1981 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:25:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06403-08 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:25:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A4D3B197E for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:25:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD441306A; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:26:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Damien Sandras To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204091656.95469.qmail@web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050204091656.95469.qmail@web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:25:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1107512711.3911.27.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:25:16 -0000 At the end of the month, we plan to release 1.2.1. I hope that we will have SuSE 9.2 packages for that moment, but I can not promise it. The person doing the packs is in exams, and SuSE is not doing them themselves. The same goes for RedHat. People are downloading packs from unknown sources on the web, they are untested, then they report crashes and problems. Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:16 +0000, Steve a écrit : > Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, > time-wasting arguments about one product/approach over > another! I was just making a polite enquiry about > whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. > > I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. No > promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone > point me at some instructions? > > Steve > Dundee, UK > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Fri Feb 4 06:06:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F1F3B06F7 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:06:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08623-02 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:06:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FBA3B0703 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:06:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cx1I4-0007kP-Vj for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:06:21 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cx1I3-00087k-4y for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:06:19 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:06:19 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:06:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1107515178.5563.37.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:06:24 -0000 --=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Conrad, > Since then I'm sticking to good old OpenPhone for my > Windows buddies. (http://www.openh323.org) OpenPhone > and the website too have some dark green patina but at > least it works for all of us. (and nobody is trying to > convince me to use Yahoo or even MSN instead of > Gnomemeeting) try openh323.sf.net or www.voxgratia.org instead. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCA1cqvdkzt4X+wX8RAkSGAJ9qIhHCx+Jc/OreVNXPaN3ulpuGOwCeKIOb x6jAQvd9tgh4z/QSiTD/tzU= =24tq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq-- From Alan.Sill@ttu.edu Fri Feb 4 06:32:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6303B1181 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09794-10 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from highenergy.phys.ttu.edu (highenergy.phys.ttu.edu [129.118.41.119]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A723D3B07F5 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (accs16-77.ttu.edu [129.118.10.221]) by highenergy.phys.ttu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104C9101AC5; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:32:04 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Message-Id: <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Alan Sill Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:32:11 -0600 To: Craig Southeren X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Mark Blake , xmeeting-ohphonex , 'Support@Codian.Com', support@codian.com, 'John Bain' , gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:32:15 -0000 Hi Craig and Damien, Was there ever a follow-up or wrapup session writeup, or conclusions=20 from this conference? In testing the openh323-based/pwlib-based=20 application ohphoneX (which is otherwise regarded as a blessing by this=20= community), a study by a serious but friendly commercial MCU vendor=20 (Codian) found the following defects, as listed below. I'd like to know whether these problems are in the openh323 or pwlib=20 layers, and thus common to GnomeMeeting, for example, or specific to=20 the otherwise very nice ohphoneX implementation. Apologies to Mark Blake for quoting his e-mail without permission, but=20= I think these are things that ought to be addressed by the ohphoneX/GM=20= developers and user community and should not have to be worked around=20 by vendors: On Jan 18, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Mark Blake wrote: > Although all the endpoint manufacturers attempt to adhere to the the=20= > various standards the quality with which they manage to do so varies=20= > tremendously from manufacturer to manufacturer. For instance of =93the=20= > big two=94 endpoint manufacturers we have seen something like 10x more=20= > bugs with one than the other. Typically these are real bugs that are=20= > not just a matter of interpretation. However there is almost always a=20= > work-around of some sort - so our code has quite a lot of stuff that=20= > attempt to detect various bugs in real time and implement=20 > work-arounds! > =A0 > > In the specific case of OhphoneX we managed to find the following=20 > major bugs / issues in only about 15 minutes of testing > > > 1) Bad H.263 bitrate advertisment > > 2) Inability to cope with some H.261 fragmented packets > > 3) Incorrect timestamps on H.261 media > > 4) H.261 encoder only uses I-macroblocks > > 5) OhphoneX does not correctly issue fast update requests in all = cases. > > So (1) is why H.263 calls do not work > > (2) is what was causing the corrupt video with H.261 but (3) would=20 > also be sufficient to cause major problems even if (2) were fixed. > > (4) is not a bug as such but means that OhphoneX is only using the=20 > most basic form of H.261 encoding which means it will need roughly 10x=20= > the bandwidth for the same quality of video compared to a =93full=94 = H.261=20 > encoder. > > (5) means that OhphoneX has poor resilience to packet loss / bad=20 > network conditions. > > =A0 > (2) and (3) are worked around in the forthcoming MCU build John=20 > previously mentioned. This is sufficient for H.261 video to work ok. > On Jan 11, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Craig Southeren wrote: > To all, > > The German Unix Users Group is holding the second annual Free > Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit n Geilenkirchen, Germany this > weekend and early next week. Myself and many other developers and = users > will be attending the event. If anyone is interested in attending, > please see the web page at: > > http://www.guug.de/veranstaltungen/telephony-summit-2005/ > > Craig > > = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org > > Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 > Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com > Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org > > Post Increment - Consulting & Services = http://www.postincrement.com > Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org > Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog =20 > http://www.southeren.com/blog > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Xmeeting-ohphonex mailing list > Xmeeting-ohphonex@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmeeting-ohphonex > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D : Alan Sill, Texas Tech University Office: Science 117, MS 41051 : : e-mail: Alan.Sill@ttu.edu ph. 806-742-3730 fax 806-742-1182 : : CDF New Office Bldg 52-102 ph. 630-840-3701 cell 806-790-7462 : =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From julien.puydt@wanadoo.fr Fri Feb 4 01:38:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1363B0A6B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:38:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24704-09 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp6.wanadoo.fr (smtp6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.25]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12E73B0957 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0606.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 376091C0028A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:38:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from hilbert.localdomain (AGrenoble-203-1-3-195.w81-49.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.49.75.195]) by mwinf0606.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E07CF1C00293 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:38:09 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050204063809919.E07CF1C00293@mwinf0606.wanadoo.fr Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm From: Julien PUYDT To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:39:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1107499176.7141.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:04:56 -0500 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 06:38:12 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 01:51 +0100, Paul Ionescu a écrit : > I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? > Does it support HAL too ? No. It includes what is needed to direct gnomemeeting from dbus ; and mostly what is needed for IM client cooperation. Snark on #gnomemeeting From hannesf@ee.ethz.ch Fri Feb 4 06:58:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14DA3B19CE for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:58:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11365-06 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:58:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4DC3B19CB for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:57:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (tranquillity.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.222]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB142D9353; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.217]) by localhost (tranquillity [129.132.2.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22811-01-5; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (80-219-165-204.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.165.204]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F27FD932F; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:29 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Hannes Friederich Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:31 +0100 To: Alan Sill X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ee.ethz.ch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:04:56 -0500 Cc: Craig Southeren , xmeeting-ohphonex , Mark Blake , 'Support@Codian.Com', gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org, support@codian.com, 'John Bain' , Andreas Fenkart Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:58:50 -0000 To everybody Inour testing sessions at ETH Zurich with various H.323 clients, we did =20= notice that H.261 video quality was good with all tested clients when =20= doing point-point conferences. The MCU currently in use at ETH Zurich =20= is a Radvision MCU 3. When connection to this MCU, H.261 is very bad as =20= soon as there are moving frames. The problems seem to be the same as =20 the developers of Codian did point out. GnomeMeeting is also affected, so this is cleary a codec-only problem. =20= GnomeMeeting 1.2 may need some patches in order to work with most =20 Radvision-MCU connections unless these connections are 7.5fps CIF. This can be done by adjusting the H.261 Capability-Settings in both =20 ohphone/GnomeMeeting. I posted this a couple of weeks ago but didn't =20 get any answer. Andreas Fenkart did investigate the problem a bit more closely. I don't =20= recall all details, but I think it has something to do with the used =20 H.261 encoder (vic) which seems to produce only a very basic H.261. =20 Perhaps Andy can give more detailed informations - he just started a =20 new job at a company and is obviously very busy right now. On behalf of the XMeeting project, we are very interested in a good =20 H.261/H.263 solution which can handle all professional H.323-endpoints =20= correctly. For those interested: ohphoneX 0.3.3 will be released soon and will =20 improve compaibility (e.g. re-enable calls to NetMeeting) and include a =20= compatibility matrix which is supposed to be used as the start-point =20 for further improvements. The roadmap of the XMeeting project will also be updated soon. With Best Regards Hannes Friederich XMeeting/ohphoneX software engineer Am 4. Feb 2005 um 12:32 schrieb Alan Sill: > Hi Craig and Damien, > > Was there ever a follow-up or wrapup session writeup, or conclusions =20= > from this conference? In testing the openh323-based/pwlib-based =20 > application ohphoneX (which is otherwise regarded as a blessing by =20 > this community), a study by a serious but friendly commercial MCU =20 > vendor (Codian) found the following defects, as listed below. > > I'd like to know whether these problems are in the openh323 or pwlib =20= > layers, and thus common to GnomeMeeting, for example, or specific to =20= > the otherwise very nice ohphoneX implementation. > > Apologies to Mark Blake for quoting his e-mail without permission, but = =20 > I think these are things that ought to be addressed by the ohphoneX/GM = =20 > developers and user community and should not have to be worked around =20= > by vendors: > > On Jan 18, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Mark Blake wrote: > >> Although all the endpoint manufacturers attempt to adhere to the the =20= >> various standards the quality with which they manage to do so varies =20= >> tremendously from manufacturer to manufacturer. For instance of =93the = =20 >> big two=94 endpoint manufacturers we have seen something like 10x = more =20 >> bugs with one than the other. Typically these are real bugs that are =20= >> not just a matter of interpretation. However there is almost always a = =20 >> work-around of some sort - so our code has quite a lot of stuff that =20= >> attempt to detect various bugs in real time and implement =20 >> work-arounds! >> =A0 >> >> In the specific case of OhphoneX we managed to find the following =20 >> major bugs / issues in only about 15 minutes of testing >> >> >> 1) Bad H.263 bitrate advertisment >> >> 2) Inability to cope with some H.261 fragmented packets >> >> 3) Incorrect timestamps on H.261 media >> >> 4) H.261 encoder only uses I-macroblocks >> >> 5) OhphoneX does not correctly issue fast update requests in all =20 >> cases. >> >> So (1) is why H.263 calls do not work >> >> (2) is what was causing the corrupt video with H.261 but (3) would =20= >> also be sufficient to cause major problems even if (2) were fixed. >> >> (4) is not a bug as such but means that OhphoneX is only using the =20= >> most basic form of H.261 encoding which means it will need roughly =20= >> 10x the bandwidth for the same quality of video compared to a =93full=94= =20 >> H.261 encoder. >> >> (5) means that OhphoneX has poor resilience to packet loss / bad =20 >> network conditions. >> >> =A0 >> (2) and (3) are worked around in the forthcoming MCU build John =20 >> previously mentioned. This is sufficient for H.261 video to work ok. >> > > > On Jan 11, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Craig Southeren wrote: > >> To all, >> >> The German Unix Users Group is holding the second annual Free >> Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit n Geilenkirchen, Germany this >> weekend and early next week. Myself and many other developers and =20 >> users >> will be attending the event. If anyone is interested in attending, >> please see the web page at: >> >> http://www.guug.de/veranstaltungen/telephony-summit-2005/ >> >> Craig >> >> = ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20= >> - >> Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org >> >> Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 >> Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com >> Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org >> >> Post Increment - Consulting & Services =20 >> http://www.postincrement.com >> Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org >> Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog =20 >> http://www.southeren.com/blog >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >> _______________________________________________ >> Xmeeting-ohphonex mailing list >> Xmeeting-ohphonex@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmeeting-ohphonex >> >> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > : Alan Sill, Texas Tech University Office: Science 117, MS 41051 : > : e-mail: Alan.Sill@ttu.edu ph. 806-742-3730 fax 806-742-1182 : > : CDF New Office Bldg 52-102 ph. 630-840-3701 cell 806-790-7462 : > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive = Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > Xmeeting-ohphonex mailing list > Xmeeting-ohphonex@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmeeting-ohphonex > From craigs@postincrement.com Fri Feb 4 07:12:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F4B3B19D0 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:12:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12543-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:12:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE6E3B17AB for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:12:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.116] ([10.0.2.116]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j14CAsxB026386; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:10:54 +1100 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 23:10:56 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: Alan Sill , "'John Bain'" , "'Support@Codian.Com'" , gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org, Mark Blake , xmeeting-ohphonex In-Reply-To: <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Message-Id: <20050204223500.0295.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:12:24 -0000 On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:32:11 -0600 Alan Sill wrote: > Hi Craig and Damien, > > Was there ever a follow-up or wrapup session writeup, or conclusions > from this conference? Several of the speakers provided copies of their presentations, but there was no formal publication produced. We intend to create such a publication next year. Links to my presentations can be found in my blog at: http://www.southeren.com/blog/archives/000104.html > In testing the openh323-based/pwlib-based > application ohphoneX (which is otherwise regarded as a blessing by this > community), a study by a serious but friendly commercial MCU vendor > (Codian) found the following defects, as listed below. I commented on these issues briefly on the OpenH323 list, but this was about the time the OpenH323 list server went offline and it appears that post never made it to the list. In essence, I agree that all of these observations are probably correct, but I am not able to spend the time required to fix them. I imagine Damien is in the same position. > I'd like to know whether these problems are in the openh323 or pwlib > layers, and thus common to GnomeMeeting, for example, or specific to > the otherwise very nice ohphoneX implementation. These issues are all probably in OpenH323 > Apologies to Mark Blake for quoting his e-mail without permission, but > I think these are things that ought to be addressed by the ohphoneX/GM > developers and user community and should not have to be worked around > by vendors: I'm uncomfortable with the language you are using here. The phrase "ought to be addressed" seems to imply an imperative that is inappplicable to an Open Source project consisting of volunteers who donate their time and expertise. We are driven by the need to "scratch" our personal itches, not to ensure compatibility with commercial products from any vendor. I agree it would be nice if these problems were fixed, but the reality is that this will require someone with both the knowledge and motivation to do so. So far, nobody has stepped forward. It occurs to me that the vendors to whom you refer have both the knowledge and the motivation. Perhaps they can use some of the revenue obtained from interoperating with our Open Source software to fund the developement of a solution to the problem they have discovered ? :) Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 07:33:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EBF3B0A42 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:33:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13588-10 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:33:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E6D3B0837 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:33:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE2C18AD1; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:35:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:33:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1107520436.3911.54.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Mark Blake , Alan Sill , xmeeting-ohphonex , 'Support@Codian.Com', Craig Southeren , support@codian.com, 'John Bain' , Andreas Fenkart X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:33:59 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 12:57 +0100, Hannes Friederich a écrit : > To everybody > > Inour testing sessions at ETH Zurich with various H.323 clients, we did > notice that H.261 video quality was good with all tested clients when > doing point-point conferences. The MCU currently in use at ETH Zurich > is a Radvision MCU 3. When connection to this MCU, H.261 is very bad as > soon as there are moving frames. The problems seem to be the same as > the developers of Codian did point out. > GnomeMeeting is also affected, so this is cleary a codec-only problem. > GnomeMeeting 1.2 may need some patches in order to work with most > Radvision-MCU connections unless these connections are 7.5fps CIF. > This can be done by adjusting the H.261 Capability-Settings in both > ohphone/GnomeMeeting. I posted this a couple of weeks ago but didn't > get any answer. > I don't remember having received that email and I don't find it in my archive. Can you send me the mail again so that it can be fixed in 1.2.1? Thank you, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 4 10:52:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE623B099A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:52:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24376-10 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:52:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E733B0A09 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:52:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:22:47 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020421224601136 ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:22:46 +0530 Message-ID: <000e01c50ad1$85fadca0$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:22:26 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2005 15:52:47.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[92841720:01C50AD1] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: openh323@openh323.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:52:29 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hello All, I want to know about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I = want to know about the performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large = no of endpoints. Well if anyone is having some test results then please = let me know because I require for the proof of concept of my project on = OpenH323 with OpenMCU. Thanks and regards, A.Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hello All,
 
       I = want to know=20 about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I want to know about = the=20 performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large no of endpoints. Well = if anyone=20 is having some test results then please let me know because I require = for the=20 proof of concept of my project on OpenH323 with OpenMCU.
 
Thanks and regards,
A.Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Fri Feb 4 12:14:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D243B0799 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:14:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29478-08 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:14:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.34]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B68E3B0775 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:14:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2005 17:14:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:14:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1107537242.4017.30.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:14:03 -0000 On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 02:34 +0100, Conrad Beckert wrote: > Any other ideas for the Windows crowds? Not really. I had the same problem a couple of months ago, when I tried to setup video calls with my friends and family. I couldn't get speex to work with netmeeting, and of course NAT and dynamic ip's are an obstacle too. The H323 client situation on windows seems to be lacking, while on the other hand SIP is well supported (Windows Messenger, XLite, SJPhone ...). Unfortunately though, the Linux SIP clients are somewhat lacking on their side, linphone isn't that good, SJPhone for Linux has no dialpad and XLite for Linux is only in it's beta stage. What I'm currently doing is having an asterisk server on my home LAN and translating H323 calls into SIP. I.e. H323 SIP Gnomemeeting <-> asterisk <-> NAT <-> Internet (register on FWD or sth.) and it works reasonable well, where the SIP connections work at least with GSM and iLBC (didn't try speex yet). When Gnomemeeting SIP support is available, the situation should generally become better regarding Windows interoperability, for voice only calls at least. Regards, Bruno. From steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk Fri Feb 4 13:05:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDE33B09A1 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:05:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32016-06 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:05:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.78]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DF433B08CD for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:05:16 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 16802 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2005 18:05:16 -0000 Message-ID: <20050204180516.16800.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [82.41.115.123] by web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:05:15 GMT Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 18:05:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Steve Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107512711.3911.27.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:05:20 -0000 Damien That's good news! The offer still stands though, if the person does not have time. Steve Dundee, UK --- Damien Sandras wrote: > At the end of the month, we plan to release 1.2.1. I > hope that we will > have SuSE 9.2 packages for that moment, but I can > not promise it. > > The person doing the packs is in exams, and SuSE is > not doing them > themselves. The same goes for RedHat. People are > downloading packs from > unknown sources on the web, they are untested, then > they report crashes > and problems. > > Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:16 +0000, Steve a > écrit : > > Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, > > time-wasting arguments about one product/approach > over > > another! I was just making a polite enquiry about > > whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. > > > > I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. > No > > promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone > > point me at some instructions? > > > > Steve > > Dundee, UK > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- > _ Damien Sandras > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > v_/_ H.323 phone : > callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > From cmor7763@alu-etsetb.upc.es Fri Feb 4 16:20:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288A73B168C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:20:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11372-01 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:20:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from gehry.upc.es (gehry.upc.es [147.83.2.21]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596873B1866 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:20:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from gehry.upc.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j14LJEFk021042 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:20:36 +0100 Received: from ackerman.upc.es (ackerman.upcnetadm.upcnet.es [147.83.2.243]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j14LHa5Y020815 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:17:36 +0100 Received: from [172.26.0.2] ([80.25.169.49]) by ackerman.upc.es (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2005020422173508:16721 ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4203E79F.5020101@alu-etsetb.upc.es> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 22:22:39 +0100 From: Christian Morales Vega User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: es-es, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Wideband CODECs? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 04/02/2005 22:17:35, Serialize by Router on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 04/02/2005 22:17:36, Serialize complete at 04/02/2005 22:17:36 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:20:40 -0000 Skype users say me they have better audio quality thanks to the use of iSAC, a wideband CODEC. Exist the possibility to use this CODEC with Gnomemeeting? Perhaps another one? Why Speex is limited to narrowband in Gnomemeeting? Thx. From derek@indranet.co.nz Fri Feb 4 16:26:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66673B178B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:26:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11534-07 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:26:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from enso.acheron.indranet.co.nz (unknown [203.167.203.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3D23B0B68 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:26:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from kauri (kauri.acheron.indranet.co.nz [192.168.1.109]) by enso.acheron.indranet.co.nz (8.9.3-20030919/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29668; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:26:02 +1300 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:26:02 +1300 (NZDT) From: Derek Smithies X-X-Sender: derek@kauri.acheron.indranet.co.nz To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability In-Reply-To: <000e01c50ad1$85fadca0$1970640a@Samyak.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: openh323@openh323.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:26:07 -0000 Hi, I have heard rumours of 70-80 concurrent calls to openmcu. You could have found this information from perusing the openh323 mail lists with a search tool. Derek. On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, asharma wrote: > hello All, > > I want to know about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I > want to know about the performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large > no of endpoints. Well if anyone is having some test results then please > let me know because I require for the proof of concept of my project on > OpenH323 with OpenMCU. > > Thanks and regards, > A.Sharma -- Derek Smithies Ph.D. This PC runs pine on linux for email IndraNet Technologies Ltd. If you find a virus apparently from me, it has Email: derek@indranet.co.nz forged the e-mail headers on someone else's machine ph +64 3 365 6485 Please do not notify me when (apparently) receiving a Web: http://www.indranet-technologies.com/ windows virus from me...... From gnome-Gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org Fri Feb 4 19:36:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38043B0777 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:36:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21582-02 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:36:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EB53B068E for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:36:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CxDvJ-0005H4-5m for Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:35:41 +0100 Received: from home-33027.b.astral.ro ([81.89.4.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:35:41 +0100 Received: from i_p_a_u_l by home-33027.b.astral.ro with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:35:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org From: Paul Ionescu Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 02:36:19 +0200 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <1107499176.7141.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: home-33027.b.astral.ro User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: gnome-gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: dbus in gm X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:36:37 -0000 OK, Thanks for the info. On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:39:36 +0100, Julien PUYDT wrote: > Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 01:51 +0100, Paul Ionescu a écrit : >> I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? Does it support >> HAL too ? > > No. It includes what is needed to direct gnomemeeting from dbus ; and > mostly what is needed for IM client cooperation. > > Snark on #gnomemeeting From asharma@samyak.com Sat Feb 5 00:24:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CA13B0707 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:24:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02217-02 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:24:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6203B0858 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:24:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:54:35 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020510543506673 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 10:54:35 +0530 Message-ID: <001101c50b42$edd1bda0$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:54:12 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2005 05:24:35.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB232A20:01C50B42] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 05:24:12 -0000 hi, thanks, but I just want to know whether if anybody has used OpenMCU and what were the results. Actually I read some statements like OpenMCU is not suitable as a product. But this was the infornmation from the forums 3 years back. Actually I want to know whether is OpenMCU suitable for large scale applications or if is there any other MCU available which is OpenSource and is better than OpenMCU and is readily available. Thanks, A. Sharma ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek Smithies" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 2:56 AM Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability > Hi, > I have heard rumours of 70-80 concurrent calls to openmcu. > > > You could have found this information from perusing the openh323 mail > lists with a search tool. > > Derek. > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, asharma wrote: > > > hello All, > > > > I want to know about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I > > want to know about the performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large > > no of endpoints. Well if anyone is having some test results then please > > let me know because I require for the proof of concept of my project on > > OpenH323 with OpenMCU. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > A.Sharma > > -- > Derek Smithies Ph.D. This PC runs pine on linux for email > IndraNet Technologies Ltd. If you find a virus apparently from me, it has > Email: derek@indranet.co.nz forged the e-mail headers on someone else's machine > ph +64 3 365 6485 Please do not notify me when (apparently) receiving a > Web: http://www.indranet-technologies.com/ windows virus from me...... > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > From dsandras@seconix.com Sat Feb 5 08:14:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7863B07B4 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:14:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22259-05 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:14:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C3A3B08D1 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:14:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.123.100] (31.210-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.210.31]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9908118F97; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:16:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Damien Sandras To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204180516.16800.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050204180516.16800.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:14:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1107609274.3193.6.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: kk@verfaction.de X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:14:36 -0000 We have had a contribution for the packages. Kilian will confirm when they are ok because we know there is a bug in the gcc from SuSE. Kilian will send a mail when we can confirm they are ready :) Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 18:05 +0000, Steve a écrit : > Damien > > That's good news! The offer still stands though, if > the person does not have time. > > Steve > Dundee, UK > > --- Damien Sandras wrote: > > At the end of the month, we plan to release 1.2.1. I > > hope that we will > > have SuSE 9.2 packages for that moment, but I can > > not promise it. > > > > The person doing the packs is in exams, and SuSE is > > not doing them > > themselves. The same goes for RedHat. People are > > downloading packs from > > unknown sources on the web, they are untested, then > > they report crashes > > and problems. > > > > Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:16 +0000, Steve a > > écrit : > > > Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, > > > time-wasting arguments about one product/approach > > over > > > another! I was just making a polite enquiry about > > > whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. > > > > > > I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. > > No > > > promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone > > > point me at some instructions? > > > > > > Steve > > > Dundee, UK > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > -- > > _ Damien Sandras > > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > > v_/_ H.323 phone : > > callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Sat Feb 5 08:17:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5A43B07A0 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:17:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22461-02 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168073B07B4 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.123.100] (31.210-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.210.31]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CE918F97 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:19:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Wideband CODECs? From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <4203E79F.5020101@alu-etsetb.upc.es> References: <4203E79F.5020101@alu-etsetb.upc.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:17:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1107609467.3193.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:17:47 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 22:22 +0100, Christian Morales Vega a écrit : > Skype users say me they have better audio quality thanks to the use of > iSAC, a wideband CODEC. > Exist the possibility to use this CODEC with Gnomemeeting? Perhaps > another one? Why Speex is limited to narrowband in Gnomemeeting? > If you are using CVS version of GnomeMeeting with CVS version of Openh323 you can use the Speex Wideband codec. It is not in 1.2.0 and won't be in 1.2.1 because it requires GUI changes: users will think we only provide Speex support as there are so many versions available :) In 2.00 you will have speex wideband support :) About iSAC, I think it is a commercial codec. I would say quality is good with Skype because it is audio-only. If you use audio-only with GnomeMeeting and a codec without compression like G.711 you will have *better* quality than with Skype, and less latency as you don't have an intermediary endpoint to route the streams like it is the case with Skype. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sun Feb 6 12:15:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7F93B087F for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12377-07 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50A93B0701 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2f9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.47.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cxq0O-0007BQ-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:15:29 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cxq0N-0007VK-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:15:27 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:15:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:15:33 -0000 Hello, I am looking for a gnomemmeeting setup for my environment and just started with VOIP. I have in mind several options, but I am not sure, which one is the most promissing one to follow....and most likely there are much smarter and better ones. If this is the wrong list, please let me know, if you know a more appropriate one. Here is my environment: I have an H323 gateway or proxy (Cisco proxy?) which is not under my control and where I can register one fixed IP address for my number. When I run gnomemeeting on my workstation and enter there under Edit/Preferences/H323 Settings/Gateway/Proxy Settings everything works. Nothing else to setup, no authentication etc. I dial h323: to call and receive calls when my number is dialed. When I am away from my workstation, I would like to call and receive calls on a laptop with dynamic DNS (running gnomemeeting). I have full control over the laptop. The workstation is still up and running, i.e. I can use it to forward or redirect calls. I am wondering, what you think about these options (or if you have better ones): 1) My assumption here is that ports 1718-1720 are used for the communication with the Cisco proxy (that is what I have seen with ohphone): Use my workstation to forward all openh323 communication from Cisco proxy to laptop and visa versa. Forward the ports 1719 and 1718 from the workstation to the laptop using an ssh tunnel: laptop$ ssh -A -R 1718:laptop:1718 -l rdorsch -N workstation Then I would need to forward all packets to port 1720 of the workstation to the Cisco proxy. Note that the workstation is not doing NAT for the laptop, so doing this might be not trivial. 2) Setup gnu gatekeeper at my workstation as proxy and let it forward all calls to and from the cisco proxy. Can gnu gatekeeper do this? I saw that I can setup gnu gatekeeper as proxy, but can gnu gatekeeper use the Cisco proxy itself? 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from the laptop to the Cisco proxy. 4) I think X and/or KDE habe options to forward sound. I could experiment with these, but I think VOIP developed for a good reason their own codecs ;-) Any comments or hints are welcome. Many thanks. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Sun Feb 6 12:30:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30313B09B5 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:30:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13212-10 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:30:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EAD3B0995 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:30:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (188-91.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.91.188]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84070648C for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:32:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:30:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:30:13 -0000 Hello, Le dimanche 06 février 2005 à 18:15 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hello, > > I am looking for a gnomemmeeting setup for my environment and just started > with VOIP. I have in mind several options, but I am not sure, which one is > the most promissing one to follow....and most likely there are much smarter > and better ones. > > If this is the wrong list, please let me know, if you know a more appropriate > one. > It should be the right list :) > Here is my environment: > I have an H323 gateway or proxy (Cisco proxy?) which is not under my control > and where I can register one fixed IP address for my number. When I run > gnomemeeting on my workstation and enter there under Edit/Preferences/H323 > Settings/Gateway/Proxy Settings everything works. Nothing else to setup, no > authentication etc. I dial h323: to call and receive calls when my > number is dialed. > Great. > When I am away from my workstation, I would like to call and receive calls on > a laptop with dynamic DNS (running gnomemeeting). I have full control over the > laptop. The workstation is still up and running, i.e. I can use it to forward > or redirect calls. > > I am wondering, what you think about these options (or if you have better > ones): > > 1) My assumption here is that ports 1718-1720 are used for the communication > with the Cisco proxy (that is what I have seen with ohphone): > > Use my workstation to forward all openh323 communication from Cisco proxy to > laptop and visa versa. > > Forward the ports 1719 and 1718 from the workstation to the laptop using an > ssh tunnel: > > laptop$ ssh -A -R 1718:laptop:1718 -l rdorsch -N workstation > > Then I would need to forward all packets to port 1720 of the workstation to > the Cisco proxy. Note that the workstation is not doing NAT for the laptop, > so doing this might be not trivial. > I'm not sure, but isn't there a possible problem for RTP? > 2) Setup gnu gatekeeper at my workstation as proxy and let it forward all > calls to and from the cisco proxy. Can gnu gatekeeper do this? I saw that I > can setup gnu gatekeeper as proxy, but can gnu gatekeeper use the Cisco proxy > itself? > Yes, I think so. I'm not a GNU GK expert, but I think it can do that for what I remember from its configuration. > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls on > my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from the > laptop to the Cisco proxy. > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. > 4) I think X and/or KDE habe options to forward sound. I could experiment with > these, but I think VOIP developed for a good reason their own codecs ;-) > Indeed. > Any comments or hints are welcome. > I think I would go for the Gatekeeper option. That is the easiest. You can forward incoming calls from the gateway to the workstation to your laptop without a problem. But I'm not sure outgoing calls will work, the gateway will most probably reject calls coming from your laptop, in that case, you will have to proxy things from inside the LAN. GNU GK seems the best way to do this. > Many thanks. > Rainer > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sun Feb 6 13:32:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3968C3B0767 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:32:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16968-04 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:32:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CED3B0995 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:32:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2f9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.47.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxrDI-0007K9-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:32:53 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxrDH-0007y4-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:32:51 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:32:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:32:55 -0000 Hello Damien, thanks for you immediate reply. I am going for the gatekeeper option. But since gnomemeeting call forwarding seems to be a lot easier, I guess, I would setup this one as a temporary (one way) solution. Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 18:30 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls > > on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from > > the laptop to the Cisco proxy. > > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, > that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be > possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. Hmm...how do I tell the gnomemeeting on my workstation the dynamic IP address, I get on my laptop (assuming that I have no physical access to the workstation in that moment)? Can I edit the configuration file and start gnomemeeting in a non-gui mode? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Sun Feb 6 13:46:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E073B0D5F for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:46:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17736-03 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:46:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE3C3B0D57 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:45:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (188-91.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.91.188]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9190129D3 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:48:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:45:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:46:01 -0000 Hello, Le dimanche 06 février 2005 à 19:32 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hello Damien, > > thanks for you immediate reply. I am going for the gatekeeper option. But > since gnomemeeting call forwarding seems to be a lot easier, I guess, I would > setup this one as a temporary (one way) solution. > Probably the best idea! > Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 18:30 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls > > > on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from > > > the laptop to the Cisco proxy. > > > > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, > > that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be > > possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. > > Hmm...how do I tell the gnomemeeting on my workstation the dynamic IP address, > I get on my laptop (assuming that I have no physical access to the > workstation in that moment)? Can I edit the configuration file and start > gnomemeeting in a non-gui mode? > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : gconftool-2 --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host 111.222.333.444 --type=string For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into account immediately. Another possibility would be to signup for a free dynamic DNS account : http://www.dyndns.org and use the dynamic DNS name. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sun Feb 6 15:55:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A1B3B06AC for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:55:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24397-09 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:55:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832C23B0907 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:54:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2f9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.47.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxtQn-0007Z3-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:54:57 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxtQm-0000wy-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:54:56 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:54:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502062154.55342.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:55:08 -0000 Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 19:45 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > gconftool-2 > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > 111.222.333.444 --type=string Debian has 1.0 in its testing and unstable branch, 1.2 is only in experimental: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnomemeeting.html I guess I most likely need $ gconftool-2 --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/always_forward true --type=bool (and switching it off again) Do you see anything which should make me upgrading to 1.2 ASAP. Switching to the experimental package means loosing all kind of security updates, etc. > > For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into > account immediately. Very cool! Just noticed that this also works for 1.0 > Another possibility would be to signup for a free dynamic DNS account : > http://www.dyndns.org and use the dynamic DNS name. Agreed. As mentioned above, I probably need to switch off and on forwarding. Many thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sun Feb 6 15:59:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB4B3B0AC5 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:59:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24696-06 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:59:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E36E3B0957 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:59:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CxtUq-0005L8-Ll for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:59:08 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CxtUo-00015j-Q5 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:59:06 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:59:06 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502062154.55342.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> <200502062154.55342.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26" Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:59:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1107723546.5751.38.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:59:12 -0000 --=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, > Do you see anything which should make me upgrading to 1.2 ASAP. Switching= to=20 > the experimental package means loosing all kind of security updates, etc. for now using the 1.2 debs is ok, as they should be security-safe (and only force new versions of pwlib and openh323 out of experimental). Thus the impact is quite limited. But you're free to wait until we'll move the whole tree dependant on new pwlib/openh323 to unstable. That should not take too long most probably. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCBoUavdkzt4X+wX8RAiLSAJ9OccYzwG/cjgjDpB+/p6xpF/IPhgCdHLXL ysTy7YwDmF7viepcIasAfU4= =IMDM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26-- From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 7 04:27:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B4E3B0859 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:27:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29728-02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:27:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9373B0653 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:27:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl25 ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:14 +0530 Message-ID: <013101c50cf7$4c9efb30$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:57:51 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2005 09:28:14.0718 (UTC) FILETIME=[597459E0:01C50CF7] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Bandwidth Control at Source X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:27:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Does any one have used Quicknet Line Jack and Phone Jack cards = under Linux? I want to know whether the bandwidth control is possible at = the source (h/w) level in Quicknet cards. Also whether the same is possible for any MPEG-4 cards which supports = H.263 codec.? I am also not knowing about any of MPEG-4 PCI based card , = supported under Linux and does support H.263. I need this info for my project. Regards, A bend in the road is not the end of = the road..Unless you fail to make the turn=20 =20 Ashutosh J Sharma Software Engineer Samyak Infotech Pvt. Ltd. 905-908, Abhijeet, Mithakhali six roads. Ellisbridge Ahmedabad-380 006 =20 asharma@samyak.com tel:=20 tel2: mobile: 91 (79) 26465758 91 (79) 55315021 91 9898487939 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 Add me to your address book... Want a signature like this?=20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
 
     Does any one = have used=20 Quicknet Line Jack and Phone Jack cards under Linux? I want to know = whether the=20 bandwidth control is possible at the source (h/w) level in Quicknet=20 cards.
Also whether the same is possible for = any MPEG-4=20 cards which supports H.263 codec.? I am also not knowing about any of = MPEG-4 PCI=20 based card , supported under Linux and does support H.263.
I need this info for my = project.
 
Regards, A bend in the road is not the end of = the=20 road..Unless you fail to make the=20 turn
Ashutosh J = Sharma
Software=20 Engineer 		Samyak Infotech Pvt. = Ltd.
905-908,=20 Abhijeet, Mithakhali six=20 roads.
Ellisbridge
Ahmedabad-380 006 =
asharma@samyak.com
tel:=20
tel2:
mobile: 		91 (79) 26465758
91 (79)=20 55315021
91 9898487939=20 =
Add me to your address = book... Want a signature like=20 = this?
------=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470-- From devel@tootai.net Mon Feb 7 06:16:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C7A3B1037 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:16:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02843-06 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:16:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mango.tootai.net (mango.tootai.net [217.11.129.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B673A3B0F4D for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:16:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (rob67-1-82-231-69-24.fbx.proxad.net [82.231.69.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by mango.tootai.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id j17BG5qI009784 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:16:06 +0100 Message-ID: <42074F20.8080807@tootai.net> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:21:04 +0100 From: daniel huhardeaux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gnomemeeting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Call numbering problem X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:16:16 -0000 Hi list, I face a strange problem: on each digit or letter from the number I want to call, when I enter it, the call is started. If I enter them very quickly, it happends each 2~3 digit. The same when I use backspace to correct or modify a number. No feature is set in preferences. DTMF is set to all. Any idea? GM 1.2.0 - 20041221 Debian SID kernel 2.6.10 with patch (swsuspend) Thanks -- Daniel Huhardeaux ______ _____ _____ ______ ______ __ enum +48 32 285 5276 /_ _// _ // _ //_ _// __ // / IAX FWD +1 7009 422493 / / / // // // / / / / /_/ // / sip:101 h323:121 @voip./_/ /____//____/ /_/ /_/ /_//_/.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 06:24:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDD93B1053 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:24:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03467-01 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:24:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25853B1035 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:24:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F29818C3C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:26:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Call numbering problem From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42074F20.8080807@tootai.net> References: <42074F20.8080807@tootai.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:24:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1107775475.29230.8.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:24:39 -0000 Hi, Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 12:21 +0100, daniel huhardeaux a écrit : > Hi list, > > I face a strange problem: on each digit or letter from the number I want > to call, when I enter it, the call is started. If I enter them very > quickly, it happends each 2~3 digit. The same when I use backspace to > correct or modify a number. No feature is set in preferences. DTMF is > set to all. > > Any idea? GM 1.2.0 - 20041221 Debian SID kernel 2.6.10 with patch > (swsuspend) > You are probably running GTK+ 2.6, they have changed something and now a callback that was only triggered when selecting something in the url's history is triggered for each key stroke. That bug is fixed in CVS and will disappear as soon as you will upgrade, ie as soon as our CVS packs are again built nightly. Kilian will most probably build new packs against the Mimas release of OpenH323 and PWLib for the 1.2.1 release shortly. > Thanks -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Mon Feb 7 12:37:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC3E3B11A0 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:37:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28417-02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:37:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 847B83B117B for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:37:36 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Feb 2005 17:37:35 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 07 Feb 2005 18:37:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:37:32 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050207173732.GA14125localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:37:38 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > > windows users. > > > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > > does not happen frequently) > > > > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. > -- > _ Damien Sandras > ........ Is this good enough? Konrad PS: ieee1394 is not working very stable with the current FC3 kernel but I have found an old bt848 card which works quite well. ========================================= gnomemeeting Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x71f9)! Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnomemeeting' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] [New Thread 108714928 (LWP 10974)] [New Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)] [New Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)] [New Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)] [New Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)] [New Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)] 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0x0092ff92 in _XEnq () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #3 0x0093036e in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #4 0x009314cb in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #5 0x0092d700 in XTranslateCoordinates () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #6 0x0056241d in gdk_window_get_origin () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #7 0x003e9b52 in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #8 0x003e9d9d in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #9 0x00c25368 in g_main_context_wakeup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #10 0x00c227bb in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #11 0x00c24242 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #12 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #13 0x0033a07e in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #14 0x0809df61 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfefaec4, envp=0xfffffdfe) at main_window.cpp:4271 Thread 8 (Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x009cbb46 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #2 0x0103b9a8 in PSyncPoint::Wait () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #3 0x02578776 in H323ConnectionsCleaner::Main () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.15.2 No symbol table info available. #4 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 7 (Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x01038e62 in PHouseKeepingThread::Main () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #3 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #4 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #5 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 6 (Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x050777d8 in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 No symbol table info available. #3 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 No symbol table info available. #4 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 No symbol table info available. #5 0x0810c3b0 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #6 0x040f33d8 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #7 0x080c7398 in GMZeroconfBrowser::Main (this=0x8118c60) at gm_contacts-zeroconf.cpp:537 m = {semaphore = @0x83f0067} #8 0x008b9bb0 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #9 0x00000000 in ?? () No symbol table info available. Thread 5 (Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #4 0x04ef6d1c in e_book_set_default_source () from /usr/lib/libebook.so.8 No symbol table info available. #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 4 (Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #4 0x0073fbff in link_thread_io_context () from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #5 0x00c791a4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x05dac458 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #7 0x00c3c8d2 in g_static_private_free () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #8 0x00000001 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #9 0x00000021 in ?? () No symbol table info available. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 13:04:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFA93B119C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:04:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30387-08 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:04:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50383B11D1 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:04:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (165-83.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.83.165]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC617A85A for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:07:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050207173732.GA14125localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <20050207173732.GA14125localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:04:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:04:55 -0000 Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 18:37 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > > > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > > > windows users. > > > > > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > > > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > > > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > > > does not happen frequently) > > > > > > > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. > > -- > > _ Damien Sandras > > ........ > > > Is this good enough? > Unfortunately not... :( Can you tell us when it is crashing? Is it random? > Konrad > > PS: ieee1394 is not working very stable with the current > FC3 kernel but I have found an old bt848 card which works > quite well. > > ========================================= > > gnomemeeting > Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x71f9)! > > Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnomemeeting' > > Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] > [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] > [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] > [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] > [New Thread 108714928 (LWP 10974)] > [New Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)] > [New Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)] > [New Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)] > [New Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)] > [New Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)] > 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #2 0x0092ff92 in _XEnq () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #3 0x0093036e in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #4 0x009314cb in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #5 0x0092d700 in XTranslateCoordinates () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #6 0x0056241d in gdk_window_get_origin () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #7 0x003e9b52 in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #8 0x003e9d9d in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #9 0x00c25368 in g_main_context_wakeup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #10 0x00c227bb in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #11 0x00c24242 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #12 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #13 0x0033a07e in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #14 0x0809df61 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfefaec4, envp=0xfffffdfe) at main_window.cpp:4271 > > Thread 8 (Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x009cbb46 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x0103b9a8 in PSyncPoint::Wait () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x02578776 in H323ConnectionsCleaner::Main () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.15.2 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 7 (Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x01038e62 in PHouseKeepingThread::Main () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 6 (Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x050777d8 in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x0810c3b0 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x040f33d8 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #7 0x080c7398 in GMZeroconfBrowser::Main (this=0x8118c60) at gm_contacts-zeroconf.cpp:537 > m = {semaphore = @0x83f0067} > #8 0x008b9bb0 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #9 0x00000000 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 5 (Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x04ef6d1c in e_book_set_default_source () from /usr/lib/libebook.so.8 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 4 (Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x0073fbff in link_thread_io_context () from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x00c791a4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x05dac458 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #7 0x00c3c8d2 in g_static_private_free () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #8 0x00000001 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #9 0x00000021 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Mon Feb 7 13:20:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330F03B06F9 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31453-07 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:19:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09E003B123C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:19:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Feb 2005 18:19:28 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 07 Feb 2005 19:19:28 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:19:21 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050207181921.GA14933localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:20:00 -0000 On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:04:53PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 18:37 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > > > > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > > > > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > > > > windows users. > > > > > > > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > > > > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > > > > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > > > > does not happen frequently) > > > > > > > > > > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. > > > -- > > > _ Damien Sandras > > > ........ > > > > > > Is this good enough? > > > > Unfortunately not... :( > > Can you tell us when it is crashing? Is it random? > To me it looks like random for now. I am trying to figure out how to reproduce it but for now I have not detected a pattern. (will try with speek 8k only and no video). Counterpart is Windows XP with MyPhone, speex 8k and no video too. it even happened immediately after startup. I was still able to continue voice conversation and if I remember correctly also video was still fine .... Greetings, Konrad. From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Mon Feb 7 14:53:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CCF3B0F1C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:53:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05023-06 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:53:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5FF3B0AC4 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:53:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2a9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.42.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CyEwn-0001id-00 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:53:25 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CyEwm-0004EX-00 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:53:24 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:53:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:53:33 -0000 Damien, Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 19:45 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 18:30 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive > > > > calls on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward > > > > calls from the laptop to the Cisco proxy. > > > > > > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, > > > that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be > > > possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. > > > > Hmm...how do I tell the gnomemeeting on my workstation the dynamic IP > > address, I get on my laptop (assuming that I have no physical access to > > the workstation in that moment)? Can I edit the configuration file and > > start gnomemeeting in a non-gui mode? > > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > gconftool-2 > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > 111.222.333.444 --type=string I did that now on the workstation machine and veryfied the settings with gconftool-2 --set ... But I do not receive anything on my laptop machine. Does gnomemeeting write a logfile which I could check? > > For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into > account immediately. > As mentioned before, I am running 1.0.2. The gconftool-2 changes take effect in the preferences box. Is that sufficient to be sure that the changes are effective? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 14:58:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9953B0933 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05237-01 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873D83B0AA1 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (165-83.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.83.165]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED79123FF for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:00:17 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050207181921.GA14933localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <20050207181921.GA14933localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:58:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:58:06 -0000 Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 19:19 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > To me it looks like random for now. I am trying to figure out how to > reproduce it but for now I have not detected a pattern. > (will try with speek 8k only and no video). Counterpart is > Windows XP with MyPhone, speex 8k and no video too. > > it even happened immediately after startup. I was still able to > continue voice conversation and if I remember correctly also > video was still fine .... > > Greetings, > > Konrad. That's extremely weird. Probably trying without video and with video preview disabled could be a good idea. It could be a bug in the firewire code (still experimental). -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 14:59:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E6E3B0B5A for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:59:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05339-02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:59:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668AE3B07A7 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:59:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (165-83.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.83.165]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA83A8DC for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:01:30 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:59:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:59:18 -0000 Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 20:53 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Damien, [...] > > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > > gconftool-2 > > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > > 111.222.333.444 --type=string > > I did that now on the workstation machine and veryfied the settings with > gconftool-2 --set ... > > But I do not receive anything on my laptop machine. Does gnomemeeting write a > logfile which I could check? > No but if you run it with "-d 3" you will see what it is doing. > > > > For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into > > account immediately. > > > > As mentioned before, I am running 1.0.2. The gconftool-2 changes take effect > in the preferences box. Is that sufficient to be sure that the changes are > effective? > Yes, the only difference between 1.0.2 and 1.2 is the name of the key, for some keys. If the change is effective, then that's ok. > Thanks, > Rainer > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Tue Feb 8 13:23:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BF03B1313 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:23:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22516-08 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:23:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC3DB3B0FE2 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:23:07 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2005 18:23:05 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2005 19:23:05 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:22:59 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050208182259.GA458localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:23:12 -0000 Perhaps this one is better: (both video send and receive disabled) I just tried to connect to 127.0.0.1 and got a busy sign as usual. Konrad PS: I am still in gdb. if you respond during the next few minutes I can do further diagnostics (but I have to go home soon :) (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/gnomemeeting [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 365)] Detaching after fork from child process 368. [New Thread 27118512 (LWP 370)] [New Thread 104651696 (LWP 373)] [New Thread 37608368 (LWP 378)] [New Thread 78207920 (LWP 379)] [New Thread 115141552 (LWP 383)] [New Thread 125631408 (LWP 400)] [New Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402)] [New Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403)] [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402) exited] [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404)] [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404) exited] [Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403) exited] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 (gdb) bt #0 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #1 0x0507aa77 in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #2 0x050738bd in sw_corby_orb_dispatch_message () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #3 0x05073a77 in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #4 0x05073c0d in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #5 0x0507749a in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #6 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #7 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #8 0x097de628 in ?? () #9 0x08b193d8 in ?? () #10 0x080b70d7 in GMZeroconfPublisher::Main (this=0x507d0ec) at zeroconf_publisher.cpp:262 #11 0x008b9bf8 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #12 0x00000001 in ?? () #13 0x00000001 in ?? () #14 0x00000000 in ?? () (gdb) f 0 0x507a7f6 : push %ebp 0x507a7f7 : mov %esp,%ebp 0x507a7f9 : mov 0x1c(%eax),%eax 0x507a7fc : jmp 0x507a806 0x507a7fe : cmp %edx,0x14(%eax) <======== crash <=================== 0x507a801 : je 0x507a80c 0x507a803 : mov 0x18(%eax),%eax 0x507a806 : test %eax,%eax 0x507a808 : jne 0x507a7fe 0x507a80a : xor %eax,%eax (gdb) i reg eax 0x72656e65 1919250021 ecx 0x97e0a88 159255176 edx 0x2 2 ebx 0x507d0ec 84398316 esp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 ebp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 esi 0x0 0 edi 0x97df9ae 159250862 eip 0x507a7fe 0x507a7fe eflags 0x10206 66054 cs 0x73 115 ss 0x7b 123 ds 0x7b 123 es 0x7b 123 fs 0x0 0 gs 0x33 51 (gdb) x/lx $eax+0x14 0x72656e79: Cannot access memory at address 0x72656e79 cat /proc/365/maps 00101000-001d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a 001d4000-001e6000 rw-p 000d2000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a 001e6000-001e9000 rw-p 001e6000 00:00 0 001e9000-001ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so 001ea000-001eb000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so 001eb000-00210000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 00210000-00211000 rw-p 00025000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 00213000-0022b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 0022b000-0022d000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 0022f000-004d8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 004d8000-004e1000 rw-p 002a9000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 004e1000-004e4000 rw-p 004e1000 00:00 0 004e6000-004ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 004ea000-004eb000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 004ed000-004f7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 004f7000-004f8000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 004fa000-0050c000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so 0050c000-0050d000 r--p 00011000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so 0050d000-0050e000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so 0050e000-00510000 rw-p 0050e000 00:00 0 00512000-00579000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 00579000-0057e000 rw-p 00066000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 0057e000-00580000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 00580000-00581000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 00581000-0058a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so 0058a000-0058b000 r--p 00008000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so 0058b000-0058c000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so 0058c000-0058d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so 0058d000-0058f000 rw-p 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so 00590000-0059f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 0059f000-005a0000 ---p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 005a0000-005a1000 r--p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 005a1000-005a2000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 005a2000-005a4000 rw-p 005a2000 00:00 0 005a4000-005b1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so 005b1000-005b2000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so 005b2000-005b4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 005b4000-005b5000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 005b6000-005be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 005be000-005bf000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 005bf000-005c3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 005c3000-005c4000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 005c4000-005c7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so 005c7000-005c8000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so 005c8000-005cb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so 005cb000-005cc000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so 005cd000-005d5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so 005d5000-005d6000 r--p 00007000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so 005d6000-005d7000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so 005d7000-005e1000 rw-p 005d7000 00:00 0 005e3000-005f4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 005f4000-005f7000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 005f7000-00605000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so 00605000-00606000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so 00606000-00612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so 00612000-00613000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so 00613000-00618000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so 00618000-00619000 r--p 00004000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so 00619000-0061a000 rw-p 00005000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so 0061a000-00641000 rw-p 0061a000 00:00 0 00643000-00649000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 00649000-0064a000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 0064a000-00663000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 00663000-00666000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 00666000-00672000 rw-p 00666000 00:00 0 00672000-0067b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so 0067b000-0067c000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so 0067e000-006a8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 006a8000-006a9000 rw-p 0002a000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 006a9000-006b6000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so 006b6000-006b9000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so 006b9000-006ca000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 006ca000-006cd000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 006d1000-006d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 006d4000-006d5000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 006d7000-006f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 006f8000-006fb000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 006fd000-00705000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 00705000-00706000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 00708000-0074e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 0074e000-00759000 rw-p 00045000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 00759000-0075a000 rw-p 00759000 00:00 0 0075a000-00764000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so 00764000-00766000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so 00766000-00772000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so 00772000-00773000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so 00775000-0078a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so 0078a000-0078b000 r--p 00014000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so 0078b000-0078c000 rw-p 00015000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so 00792000-008b5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008b5000-008b6000 ---p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008b6000-008b8000 r--p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008b8000-008ba000 rw-p 00125000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008ba000-008bc000 rw-p 008ba000 00:00 0 008be000-008df000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so 008df000-008e0000 r--p 00020000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so 008e0000-008e1000 rw-p 00021000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so 008e3000-008e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so 008e5000-008e6000 r--p 00001000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so 008e6000-008e7000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so 008e9000-008f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 008f8000-008f9000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 008fb000-009be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 009be000-009c2000 rw-p 000c3000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 009c4000-009d2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so 009d2000-009d3000 r--p 0000d000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so 009d3000-009d4000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so 009d4000-009d6000 rw-p 009d4000 00:00 0 009d8000-009e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 009e5000-009e6000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 009e8000-009ef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 009ef000-009f0000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 009f2000-00a07000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 00a07000-00a08000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 00a08000-00a0a000 rw-p 00a08000 00:00 0 00a0c000-00a1f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 00a1f000-00a20000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 00a22000-00a82000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 00a82000-00a89000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 00a8b000-00aa8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 00aa8000-00aaa000 rw-p 0001d000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 00aac000-00ace000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 00ace000-00ad1000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 00ad1000-00ad2000 rw-p 00ad1000 00:00 0 00ad4000-00ae5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 00ae5000-00ae6000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 00ae8000-00aef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 00aef000-00af0000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 00af2000-00af4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 00af4000-00af5000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 00af7000-00af9000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 00af9000-00afa000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 00afc000-00b04000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 00b04000-00b05000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 00b07000-00b0e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 00b0e000-00b0f000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 00b11000-00bd2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 00bd2000-00bd7000 rw-p 000c1000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 00bd7000-00bdd000 rw-p 00bd7000 00:00 0 00bdf000-00bfc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 00bfc000-00bfd000 rw-p 0001c000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 00bff000-00c79000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c79000-00c7a000 rw-p 0007a000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c7c000-00c7e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c7e000-00c7f000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c81000-00cbb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 00cbb000-00cbd000 rw-p 00039000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 00cbf000-00cc1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 00cc1000-00cc2000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 00cc4000-00ce4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 00ce4000-00ce5000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 00ce5000-00ceb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so 00ceb000-00ced000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so 00d05000-00d10000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 00d10000-00d11000 rw-p 0000a000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 00d17000-00d48000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a 00d48000-00d4b000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a 00d4e000-00d63000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 00d63000-00d64000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 00d66000-00d78000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 00d78000-00d79000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 00d7c000-00d83000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 00d83000-00d84000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 00d86000-00d9a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 00d9a000-00d9b000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 00db3000-00dbe000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 00dbe000-00dbf000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 00dc2000-00df3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 00df3000-00df8000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 00dfa000-00dfd000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 00dfd000-00dfe000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 00dfe000-00e20000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 00e20000-00e21000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 00f47000-00f49000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so 00f49000-00f4a000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so 00f4d000-00f4f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so 00f4f000-00f50000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so 00fcd000-00fdb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so 00fdb000-00fdc000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so 00fdc000-00fdd000 ---p 00fdc000 00:00 0 00fdd000-019dd000 rwxp 00fdd000 00:00 0 019dd000-019de000 ---p 019dd000 00:00 0 019de000-023de000 rwxp 019de000 00:00 0 0277f000-027dc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 027dc000-027df000 rw-p 0005c000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 029a2000-02a03000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 02a03000-02a05000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 02a05000-02a21000 rw-p 02a05000 00:00 0 02d15000-02da0000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 02da0000-02da4000 rw-p 0008a000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 02f08000-02f1b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 02f1b000-02f1c000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 02f1e000-02f81000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 02f81000-02f83000 rw-p 00063000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 03320000-03350000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 03350000-03351000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 03353000-033ae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 033ae000-033af000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 033b1000-03471000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 03471000-03476000 rw-p 000bf000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 03478000-034ac000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 034ac000-034ad000 rw-p 00033000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 034ad000-034b0000 rw-p 034ad000 00:00 0 035ec000-03612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 03612000-03616000 rw-p 00026000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 03693000-036ee000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 036ee000-036f3000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 036f5000-03db2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so 03db2000-03e00000 rw-p 006bc000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so 03e00000-03e01000 rw-p 03e00000 00:00 0 03e03000-04068000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 04068000-0408e000 rw-p 00264000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 0408e000-04095000 rw-p 0408e000 00:00 0 04095000-04096000 ---p 04095000 00:00 0 04096000-04a96000 rwxp 04096000 00:00 0 04b0b000-04bae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 04bae000-04bb2000 rw-p 000a3000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 04f3d000-05021000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 05021000-0502a000 rw-p 000e3000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 0502a000-05032000 rw-p 0502a000 00:00 0 05034000-05065000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 05065000-05068000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 0506a000-0507d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 0507d000-0507e000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 0507e000-05190000 rw-p 0507e000 00:00 0 051f4000-05242000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 05242000-0524c000 rw-p 0004d000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 059cd000-059ce000 ---p 059cd000 00:00 0 059ce000-063ce000 rwxp 059ce000 00:00 0 063ce000-063cf000 ---p 063ce000 00:00 0 063cf000-06dcf000 rwxp 063cf000 00:00 0 06dcf000-06dd0000 ---p 06dcf000 00:00 0 06dd0000-077d0000 rwxp 06dd0000 00:00 0 08039000-0810b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting 0810b000-08118000 rw-p 000d1000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting 08118000-08119000 rw-p 08118000 00:00 0 08119000-0811a000 ---p 08119000 00:00 0 0811a000-08b1a000 rwxp 0811a000 00:00 0 09516000-09861000 rw-p 09516000 00:00 0 b6856000-b6857000 ---p b6856000 00:00 0 b6857000-b7257000 rwxp b6857000 00:00 0 b7257000-b7258000 ---p b7257000 00:00 0 b7258000-b7c58000 rwxp b7258000 00:00 0 b7c58000-b7cb8000 rw-s 00000000 00:07 36208644 /SYSV00000000 (deleted) b7cb8000-b7cca000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1689784 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/l048013t.pfa b7cca000-b7d2c000 rw-p b7cca000 00:00 0 b7d94000-b7d9a000 r--s 00000000 03:03 1573058 /usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache b7d9a000-b7d9b000 r--p 00b61000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7d9b000-b7da1000 r--p 00b47000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7da1000-b7dce000 r--p 00b09000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7dce000-b7fce000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7fce000-b7fdf000 rw-p b7fce000 00:00 0 bfe5c000-bfe68000 rwxp bfe5c000 00:00 0 bfe68000-c0000000 rw-p bfe68000 00:00 0 ffffe000-fffff000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0 From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 8 14:39:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C71F3B0961 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:39:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26871-10 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:39:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1293B0BA5 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (94-99.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.99.94]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8692291; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:41:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050208182259.GA458localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <20050208182259.GA458localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:38:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: kk@verfaction.de X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 19:39:07 -0000 Good, at least we see it crashes in the ZeroConf code. And I also see that you are running libhowl-0.9.6. GnomeMeeting explicitely requests HOWL (the ZeroConf library) 0.9.7 because we are aware that there is a bug in HOWL 0.9.6 and that this bug can crash GnomeMeeting and has been fixed in 0.9.7. That means that : - the packages you are using are buggy - the maintainer of those packages forced HOWL 0.9.6 to be used when GnomeMeeting requested 0.9.7, so he had to modify GnomeMeeting for that. Would it be possible for you to contact the person who built the packages and to put it in contact with us? All of this wouldn't happen if we had support from RedHat and could offer correct packages to our users :( Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 19:22 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > Perhaps this one is better: > > (both video send and receive disabled) > > I just tried to connect to 127.0.0.1 and got a busy sign > as usual. > > Konrad > > PS: I am still in gdb. if you respond during the next few minutes > I can do further diagnostics (but I have to go home soon :) > > (gdb) r > Starting program: /usr/bin/gnomemeeting > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 365)] > Detaching after fork from child process 368. > [New Thread 27118512 (LWP 370)] > [New Thread 104651696 (LWP 373)] > [New Thread 37608368 (LWP 378)] > [New Thread 78207920 (LWP 379)] > [New Thread 115141552 (LWP 383)] > [New Thread 125631408 (LWP 400)] > [New Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] > [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402)] > [New Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403)] > [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402) exited] > [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404)] > [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404) exited] > [Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403) exited] > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] > 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #1 0x0507aa77 in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #2 0x050738bd in sw_corby_orb_dispatch_message () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #3 0x05073a77 in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #4 0x05073c0d in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #5 0x0507749a in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #6 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #7 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #8 0x097de628 in ?? () > #9 0x08b193d8 in ?? () > #10 0x080b70d7 in GMZeroconfPublisher::Main (this=0x507d0ec) at zeroconf_publisher.cpp:262 > #11 0x008b9bf8 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #12 0x00000001 in ?? () > #13 0x00000001 in ?? () > #14 0x00000000 in ?? () > (gdb) f 0 > > 0x507a7f6 : push %ebp > 0x507a7f7 : mov %esp,%ebp > 0x507a7f9 : mov 0x1c(%eax),%eax > 0x507a7fc : jmp 0x507a806 > 0x507a7fe : cmp %edx,0x14(%eax) <======== crash <=================== > 0x507a801 : je 0x507a80c > 0x507a803 : mov 0x18(%eax),%eax > 0x507a806 : test %eax,%eax > 0x507a808 : jne 0x507a7fe > 0x507a80a : xor %eax,%eax > > (gdb) i reg > eax 0x72656e65 1919250021 > ecx 0x97e0a88 159255176 > edx 0x2 2 > ebx 0x507d0ec 84398316 > esp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 > ebp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 > esi 0x0 0 > edi 0x97df9ae 159250862 > eip 0x507a7fe 0x507a7fe > eflags 0x10206 66054 > cs 0x73 115 > ss 0x7b 123 > ds 0x7b 123 > es 0x7b 123 > fs 0x0 0 > gs 0x33 51 > > (gdb) x/lx $eax+0x14 > 0x72656e79: Cannot access memory at address 0x72656e79 > > cat /proc/365/maps > > > 00101000-001d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a > 001d4000-001e6000 rw-p 000d2000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a > 001e6000-001e9000 rw-p 001e6000 00:00 0 > 001e9000-001ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so > 001ea000-001eb000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so > 001eb000-00210000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00210000-00211000 rw-p 00025000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00213000-0022b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 > 0022b000-0022d000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 > 0022f000-004d8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 004d8000-004e1000 rw-p 002a9000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 004e1000-004e4000 rw-p 004e1000 00:00 0 > 004e6000-004ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004ea000-004eb000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004ed000-004f7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004f7000-004f8000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004fa000-0050c000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so > 0050c000-0050d000 r--p 00011000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so > 0050d000-0050e000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so > 0050e000-00510000 rw-p 0050e000 00:00 0 > 00512000-00579000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 00579000-0057e000 rw-p 00066000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 0057e000-00580000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 > 00580000-00581000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 > 00581000-0058a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so > 0058a000-0058b000 r--p 00008000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so > 0058b000-0058c000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so > 0058c000-0058d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so > 0058d000-0058f000 rw-p 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so > 00590000-0059f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 0059f000-005a0000 ---p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 005a0000-005a1000 r--p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 005a1000-005a2000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 005a2000-005a4000 rw-p 005a2000 00:00 0 > 005a4000-005b1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so > 005b1000-005b2000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so > 005b2000-005b4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 > 005b4000-005b5000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 > 005b6000-005be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 > 005be000-005bf000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 > 005bf000-005c3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 > 005c3000-005c4000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 > 005c4000-005c7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so > 005c7000-005c8000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so > 005c8000-005cb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so > 005cb000-005cc000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so > 005cd000-005d5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so > 005d5000-005d6000 r--p 00007000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so > 005d6000-005d7000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so > 005d7000-005e1000 rw-p 005d7000 00:00 0 > 005e3000-005f4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 > 005f4000-005f7000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 > 005f7000-00605000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so > 00605000-00606000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so > 00606000-00612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so > 00612000-00613000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so > 00613000-00618000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so > 00618000-00619000 r--p 00004000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so > 00619000-0061a000 rw-p 00005000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so > 0061a000-00641000 rw-p 0061a000 00:00 0 > 00643000-00649000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 > 00649000-0064a000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 > 0064a000-00663000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 > 00663000-00666000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 > 00666000-00672000 rw-p 00666000 00:00 0 > 00672000-0067b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so > 0067b000-0067c000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so > 0067e000-006a8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 > 006a8000-006a9000 rw-p 0002a000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 > 006a9000-006b6000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so > 006b6000-006b9000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so > 006b9000-006ca000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 > 006ca000-006cd000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 > 006d1000-006d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 006d4000-006d5000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 006d7000-006f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 > 006f8000-006fb000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 > 006fd000-00705000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 > 00705000-00706000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 > 00708000-0074e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 > 0074e000-00759000 rw-p 00045000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 > 00759000-0075a000 rw-p 00759000 00:00 0 > 0075a000-00764000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so > 00764000-00766000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so > 00766000-00772000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so > 00772000-00773000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so > 00775000-0078a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so > 0078a000-0078b000 r--p 00014000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so > 0078b000-0078c000 rw-p 00015000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so > 00792000-008b5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008b5000-008b6000 ---p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008b6000-008b8000 r--p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008b8000-008ba000 rw-p 00125000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008ba000-008bc000 rw-p 008ba000 00:00 0 > 008be000-008df000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so > 008df000-008e0000 r--p 00020000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so > 008e0000-008e1000 rw-p 00021000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so > 008e3000-008e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so > 008e5000-008e6000 r--p 00001000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so > 008e6000-008e7000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so > 008e9000-008f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 > 008f8000-008f9000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 > 008fb000-009be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 > 009be000-009c2000 rw-p 000c3000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 > 009c4000-009d2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so > 009d2000-009d3000 r--p 0000d000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so > 009d3000-009d4000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so > 009d4000-009d6000 rw-p 009d4000 00:00 0 > 009d8000-009e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 > 009e5000-009e6000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 > 009e8000-009ef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 > 009ef000-009f0000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 > 009f2000-00a07000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 > 00a07000-00a08000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 > 00a08000-00a0a000 rw-p 00a08000 00:00 0 > 00a0c000-00a1f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 > 00a1f000-00a20000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 > 00a22000-00a82000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 > 00a82000-00a89000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 > 00a8b000-00aa8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 > 00aa8000-00aaa000 rw-p 0001d000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 > 00aac000-00ace000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 > 00ace000-00ad1000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 > 00ad1000-00ad2000 rw-p 00ad1000 00:00 0 > 00ad4000-00ae5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 > 00ae5000-00ae6000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 > 00ae8000-00aef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 > 00aef000-00af0000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 > 00af2000-00af4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 > 00af4000-00af5000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 > 00af7000-00af9000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 > 00af9000-00afa000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 > 00afc000-00b04000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 > 00b04000-00b05000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 > 00b07000-00b0e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 > 00b0e000-00b0f000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 > 00b11000-00bd2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 > 00bd2000-00bd7000 rw-p 000c1000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 > 00bd7000-00bdd000 rw-p 00bd7000 00:00 0 > 00bdf000-00bfc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 > 00bfc000-00bfd000 rw-p 0001c000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 > 00bff000-00c79000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c79000-00c7a000 rw-p 0007a000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c7c000-00c7e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c7e000-00c7f000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c81000-00cbb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00cbb000-00cbd000 rw-p 00039000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00cbf000-00cc1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 > 00cc1000-00cc2000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 > 00cc4000-00ce4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 > 00ce4000-00ce5000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 > 00ce5000-00ceb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so > 00ceb000-00ced000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so > 00d05000-00d10000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 > 00d10000-00d11000 rw-p 0000a000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 > 00d17000-00d48000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a > 00d48000-00d4b000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a > 00d4e000-00d63000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 > 00d63000-00d64000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 > 00d66000-00d78000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 > 00d78000-00d79000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 > 00d7c000-00d83000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 > 00d83000-00d84000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 > 00d86000-00d9a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 00d9a000-00d9b000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 00db3000-00dbe000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 00dbe000-00dbf000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 00dc2000-00df3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00df3000-00df8000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00dfa000-00dfd000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 > 00dfd000-00dfe000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 > 00dfe000-00e20000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > 00e20000-00e21000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > 00f47000-00f49000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so > 00f49000-00f4a000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so > 00f4d000-00f4f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so > 00f4f000-00f50000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so > 00fcd000-00fdb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so > 00fdb000-00fdc000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so > 00fdc000-00fdd000 ---p 00fdc000 00:00 0 > 00fdd000-019dd000 rwxp 00fdd000 00:00 0 > 019dd000-019de000 ---p 019dd000 00:00 0 > 019de000-023de000 rwxp 019de000 00:00 0 > 0277f000-027dc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 > 027dc000-027df000 rw-p 0005c000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 > 029a2000-02a03000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 > 02a03000-02a05000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 > 02a05000-02a21000 rw-p 02a05000 00:00 0 > 02d15000-02da0000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 > 02da0000-02da4000 rw-p 0008a000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 > 02f08000-02f1b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 > 02f1b000-02f1c000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 > 02f1e000-02f81000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 > 02f81000-02f83000 rw-p 00063000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 > 03320000-03350000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 03350000-03351000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 03353000-033ae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 > 033ae000-033af000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 > 033b1000-03471000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 > 03471000-03476000 rw-p 000bf000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 > 03478000-034ac000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 034ac000-034ad000 rw-p 00033000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 034ad000-034b0000 rw-p 034ad000 00:00 0 > 035ec000-03612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 > 03612000-03616000 rw-p 00026000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 > 03693000-036ee000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 > 036ee000-036f3000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 > 036f5000-03db2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so > 03db2000-03e00000 rw-p 006bc000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so > 03e00000-03e01000 rw-p 03e00000 00:00 0 > 03e03000-04068000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > 04068000-0408e000 rw-p 00264000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > 0408e000-04095000 rw-p 0408e000 00:00 0 > 04095000-04096000 ---p 04095000 00:00 0 > 04096000-04a96000 rwxp 04096000 00:00 0 > 04b0b000-04bae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 > 04bae000-04bb2000 rw-p 000a3000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 > 04f3d000-05021000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 > 05021000-0502a000 rw-p 000e3000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 > 0502a000-05032000 rw-p 0502a000 00:00 0 > 05034000-05065000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 > 05065000-05068000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 > 0506a000-0507d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 > 0507d000-0507e000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 > 0507e000-05190000 rw-p 0507e000 00:00 0 > 051f4000-05242000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 > 05242000-0524c000 rw-p 0004d000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 > 059cd000-059ce000 ---p 059cd000 00:00 0 > 059ce000-063ce000 rwxp 059ce000 00:00 0 > 063ce000-063cf000 ---p 063ce000 00:00 0 > 063cf000-06dcf000 rwxp 063cf000 00:00 0 > 06dcf000-06dd0000 ---p 06dcf000 00:00 0 > 06dd0000-077d0000 rwxp 06dd0000 00:00 0 > 08039000-0810b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting > 0810b000-08118000 rw-p 000d1000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting > 08118000-08119000 rw-p 08118000 00:00 0 > 08119000-0811a000 ---p 08119000 00:00 0 > 0811a000-08b1a000 rwxp 0811a000 00:00 0 > 09516000-09861000 rw-p 09516000 00:00 0 > b6856000-b6857000 ---p b6856000 00:00 0 > b6857000-b7257000 rwxp b6857000 00:00 0 > b7257000-b7258000 ---p b7257000 00:00 0 > b7258000-b7c58000 rwxp b7258000 00:00 0 > b7c58000-b7cb8000 rw-s 00000000 00:07 36208644 /SYSV00000000 (deleted) > b7cb8000-b7cca000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1689784 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/l048013t.pfa > b7cca000-b7d2c000 rw-p b7cca000 00:00 0 > b7d94000-b7d9a000 r--s 00000000 03:03 1573058 /usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache > b7d9a000-b7d9b000 r--p 00b61000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7d9b000-b7da1000 r--p 00b47000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7da1000-b7dce000 r--p 00b09000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7dce000-b7fce000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7fce000-b7fdf000 rw-p b7fce000 00:00 0 > bfe5c000-bfe68000 rwxp bfe5c000 00:00 0 > bfe68000-c0000000 rw-p bfe68000 00:00 0 > ffffe000-fffff000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0 > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Tue Feb 8 15:03:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8804F3B078A for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:03:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28858-02 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:03:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A8B63B16A9 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:01:33 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2005 20:01:31 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2005 21:01:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:01:23 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050208200123.GA3250localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:03:17 -0000 On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:38:57PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Good, at least we see it crashes in the ZeroConf code. > > And I also see that you are running libhowl-0.9.6. > > GnomeMeeting explicitely requests HOWL (the ZeroConf library) 0.9.7 > because we are aware that there is a bug in HOWL 0.9.6 and that this bug > can crash GnomeMeeting and has been fixed in 0.9.7. > > That means that : > - the packages you are using are buggy > - the maintainer of those packages forced HOWL 0.9.6 to be used when > GnomeMeeting requested 0.9.7, so he had to modify GnomeMeeting for that. > > Would it be possible for you to contact the person who built the > packages and to put it in contact with us? > > All of this wouldn't happen if we had support from RedHat and could > offer correct packages to our users :( > ... you see I am still at work :( I got GM from http://yum.nrpms.net/ (web site is at www.nrpms.net) The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. My system is fully uptodate Fedora Core 3 which unfortunately still has howl-0.9.6-6 .... Thanks Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 8 15:14:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA2E3B16BD for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:14:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29438-01 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:13:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCF23B1182 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:13:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (94-99.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.99.94]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2A118ADA for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:15:56 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050208200123.GA3250localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <20050208200123.GA3250localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:13:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:14:01 -0000 Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 21:01 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > ... you see I am still at work :( > :-( > I got GM from http://yum.nrpms.net/ > > (web site is at www.nrpms.net) > > The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was > responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. > ok please tell us what he answered. > My system is fully uptodate Fedora Core 3 which unfortunately still > has howl-0.9.6-6 .... > In that case that is better to disable howl than to force another version that the one that was recommended by the software ;) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Wed Feb 9 06:57:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0920E3B076E for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:57:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10178-05 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:57:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63A823B07AB for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:57:03 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Feb 2005 11:57:02 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 09 Feb 2005 12:57:02 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:56:59 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050209115659.GA11626localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:57:06 -0000 On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:13:32PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: ..... > > The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was > > responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. > > > > ok please tell us what he answered. > He will update to howl-0.9.10 as soon as time permits. Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 9 07:02:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D499E3B1242 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:02:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10417-10 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:02:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2563B1274 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:02:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14864C50F for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:05:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050209115659.GA11626localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> <20050209115659.GA11626localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:02:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:02:38 -0000 Excellent news, thanks for the feedback! I think (but I'm not sure!) that if you shutdown mdnsresponder, the bug won't happen. I'm really not sure, actually I don't remember and I could be wrong. Le mercredi 09 février 2005 à 12:56 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:13:32PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > ..... > > > The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was > > > responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. > > > > > > > ok please tell us what he answered. > > > > He will update to howl-0.9.10 as soon as time permits. > > Konrad > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Wed Feb 9 09:31:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870E43B1617 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:31:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18584-04 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:31:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B680B3B08A8 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:31:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from j385b.j.pppool.de ([85.74.56.91] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cyss0-0006Su-00 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:31:08 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cyss1-0005cH-00 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:31:09 +0100 X-IMAP-Sender: rd From: Rainer Dorsch To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:30:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> X-KMail-Link-Message: 119527 X-KMail-Link-Type: reply X-KMail-CryptoFormat: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline X-KMail-Recipients: GnomeMeeting mailing list Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: Message-Id: Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:31:11 -0000 Damien, On Montag 07 Februar 2005 20:59, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 20:53 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > > Damien, > > [...] > > > > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > > > gconftool-2 > > > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > > > 111.222.333.444 --type=string > > > > I did that now on the workstation machine and veryfied the settings with > > gconftool-2 --set ... > > > > But I do not receive anything on my laptop machine. Does gnomemeeting > > write a logfile which I could check? > > No but if you run it with "-d 3" you will see what it is doing. Thanks, good hint, brings lots of information. This is the log on the workstation, which is supposed to forward the call. Do you understand from this why gnomemeeting does not forward the call? 2005/02/09 15:12:02.245 6:17.792 H323 Listener:830a2b8 H323TCP Started connection: host=::ffff:119.152.191.172:3510, if=119.152.251.114:1720, handle=37 2005/02/09 15:12:02.246 6:17.793 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Started incoming call thread 2005/02/09 15:12:02.246 6:17.793 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Awaiting first PDU 2005/02/09 15:12:02.252 6:17.800 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Receiving PDU: setup 2005/02/09 15:12:02.253 6:17.800 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.253 6:17.800 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.253 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: MS-GSM{sw} <5> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.254 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.254 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <2> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.254 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <8> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.802 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <4> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.802 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: G.726-32k{sw} <9> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.802 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: G.711-uLaw-64k{sw} <6> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: G.711-ALaw-64k{sw} <7> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.256 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.256 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.256 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.257 6:17.804 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.257 6:17.804 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.257 6:17.804 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.805 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.805 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: MS-GSM{sw} <5> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.805 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <2> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.259 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <8> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.259 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <4> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.259 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: G.726-32k{sw} <9> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.260 6:17.807 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: G.711-uLaw-64k{sw} <6> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.260 6:17.807 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: G.711-ALaw-64k{sw} <7> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.260 6:17.807 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.261 6:17.808 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.261 6:17.808 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.261 6:17.808 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.262 6:17.809 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.262 6:17.809 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.810 H225 Answer:83c0d70 RFC2833 Handler created 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.810 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.810 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Handling PDU: Setup callRef=83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/09 15:12:02.264 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/09 15:12:02.264 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/09 15:12:02.264 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.812 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Source signal address ip$119.152.191.172:1720 and TCP peer address ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510 indicate remote endpoint is behind NAT 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.813 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/09 15:12:02.267 6:17.814 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/09 15:12:02.276 6:17.823 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 reason=EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 set to EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending release complete PDU: callRef=83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.280 6:17.827 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending PDU: releaseComplete 2005/02/09 15:12:02.280 6:17.828 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections 2005/02/09 15:12:02.281 6:17.828 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 closing: connectionState=NoConnectionActive 2005/02/09 15:12:02.281 6:17.828 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Application not accepting calls 2005/02/09 15:12:02.282 6:17.829 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 reason=EndedByTransportFail 2005/02/09 15:12:02.283 6:17.831 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Signal channel stopped on first PDU. 2005/02/09 15:12:02.285 6:17.832 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::Close 2005/02/09 15:12:02.286 6:17.833 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:83c0d70 2005/02/09 15:12:02.286 6:17.833 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 terminated. 2005/02/09 15:12:02.309 6:17.856 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 deleted. 2005/02/09 15:12:02.310 6:17.857 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections Thanks, Rainer From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 9 09:48:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BABD3B1118 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:48:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19861-09 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:48:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2243B08BD for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:48:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A2D18D12 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:50:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:48:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:48:06 -0000 Le mercredi 09 février 2005 à 15:30 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Damien, > Thanks, good hint, brings lots of information. This is the log on the > workstation, which is supposed to forward the call. Do you understand from > this why gnomemeeting does not forward the call? > yes > 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.812 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Source > signal address ip$119.152.191.172:1720 and TCP peer address > ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510 indicate remote endpoint is behind NAT The remote endpoint is not behind NAT. That's a bug in the openh323 release shipped with GM 1.2 when using ipv6, it will be fixed when we release 1.2.1. I'm not sure it triggers the problem as even with that bug, it should work. But I see this : 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 set to EndedByNoAccept I do not know your IP addresses, but I see no forwarding being done. Are you sure it is enabled? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Wed Feb 9 11:53:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C1B3B0904 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:53:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28116-04 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:53:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8708E3B116D for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:48:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Feb 2005 16:48:40 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 09 Feb 2005 17:48:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:48:37 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050209164837.GA16647localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:53:52 -0000 On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:02:34PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Excellent news, thanks for the feedback! > > I think (but I'm not sure!) that if you shutdown mdnsresponder, the bug > won't happen. I'm really not sure, actually I don't remember and I could > be wrong. > > when I shutdown mdnsresponder I get the following on startup: gnomemeeting [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 dont know yet if the crash frequency is now zero or not. ---------------------- furthermore: when quitting or clicking on the X then GM is not really terminated. I always have to ^C it as well. (independent of mdnsresponder) Greetings, Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 9 12:59:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7553B0A28 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:59:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00867-01 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:59:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DBF3B097B for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:59:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from 91-224.244.81.adsl.skynet.be (91-224.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.224.91]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A2A16EC9 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:01:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050209164837.GA16647localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> <20050209164837.GA16647localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1107971952.1434.4.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:59:12 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:59:29 -0000 Le mer 09/02/2005 à 17:48, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:02:34PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > Excellent news, thanks for the feedback! > > > > I think (but I'm not sure!) that if you shutdown mdnsresponder, the bug > > won't happen. I'm really not sure, actually I don't remember and I could > > be wrong. > > > > > when I shutdown mdnsresponder I get the following on startup: > > gnomemeeting > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 > Yes, that is a bug in howl. It should silently fail :-/ > > dont know yet if the crash frequency is now zero or not. > > ---------------------- > > > furthermore: when quitting or clicking on the X then > GM is not really terminated. I always have to ^C it > as well. > (independent of mdnsresponder) > When clicking on the X, GM is hidden. You can make it reappear by clicking on the icon in the KDE systray, or gnome notification area, or whatever it is called on your system and DE. You have to properly quit to make it exit. > Greetings, > > Konrad > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From jerome@coffeebreaks.org Fri Feb 11 07:27:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4873B1B1D for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:27:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02831-09 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no [62.101.193.41]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CF93B1B3C for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from dolcevita.localnet (host-81-191-122-9.bluecom.no [81.191.122.9]) by s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373D13389BA; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:27:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dolcevita.localnet) by dolcevita.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzZtP-00078H-Tn; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:27:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Jerome Lacoste To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CoffeeBreaks Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:27:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1108124847.8061.215.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: markhellman@techie.com X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:27:32 -0000 On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 21:27 +0000, Mark Hellman wrote: > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > know you are busy volunteers... > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE > 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 > packages still are not available... > > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was > released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were > made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... Mark, I will add a little argument to Damien and Craig's answers. It's not because you can get Skype for nothing that you can compare it to GnomeMeeting. I think you are mixing the different freedoms here. Skype is free as in beer (and not fully neither). GnomeMeeting is free as in beer AND as in speech. Competition is always good and should benefit to all of us in the end. Although I like what skype did to VoIP in general, i.e. raising the bar when it comes to simplify the setup & use, Skype locks you in a closed platform (and a suboptimal protocol). You are *today* 'free' to use Skype to make PC2PC calls, and you can use their service to make PC2PHONE calls (*). Nothing can say what will happen tomorrow. With GM you have the real Freedom. You can do what you want with it. Even start you own business around it as long as you stick to the rules defined by its license. You can expect this software to work not only today by also tomorrow. I find it sad that the main Linux distributions are not that involved with GM, because I believe this is today's Internet 'killer' application. If there was a little bit more investment behind it, GM could speed its development up and improve its support a lot. I would have expected someone like Michael Robertson to step up to the challenge, but he's probably busy with his new online music service... (Maybe will he read that mail?) Maybe to you, Cheers, Jerome (*) For my part I stick to prepaid cards as for long distance calls (Europe - South America), Skype Out has been twice more expensive and of lower quality in my experience, although it worked well for intra-Europe calls. From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 11 08:46:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90573B07EA for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:46:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08243-10 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:46:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5AE3B073A for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:46:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl25 ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:16:29 +0530 Message-ID: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:15:56 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2005 13:46:29.0156 (UTC) FILETIME=[1682F640:01C51040] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: openh323@openh323.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:46:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, Well can anyone please tell me any H.263 based card and compatible = WebCam + PTZ Camera (low cost) which must be supported by GnomeMeeting = and of course OpenH323. I am not getting any relevant information = regarding this. Actually I am confused in the output format of Camera and Input to the = H.263 supported card. Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is same as H.263. So does that mean = that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263 support. Thanks and regards. Ashutosh Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello All,
 
   Well can anyone please = tell me any=20 H.263 based card  and compatible WebCam + PTZ Camera (low = cost) which=20 must be supported by GnomeMeeting and of course OpenH323. I am not = getting any=20 relevant information regarding this.
 
Actually I am confused in the output = format of=20 Camera and Input to the H.263 supported card.
 
Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is = same as H.263.=20 So does that mean that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263=20 support.
 
Thanks and regards.
Ashutosh = Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0-- From kk@verfaction.de Fri Feb 11 12:07:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56C63B1C8E for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:07:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21509-06 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:07:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0D93B1C67 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:07:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CzeGD-0001pZ-A4 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:17 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzeGA-0008Vr-Qa for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:15 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:14 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:07:20 -0000 --=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharma, > Well can anyone please tell me any H.263 based card and compatible > WebCam + PTZ Camera (low cost) which must be supported by GnomeMeeting > and of course OpenH323. I am not getting any relevant information > regarding this. > =20 > Actually I am confused in the output format of Camera and Input to the > H.263 supported card. the camera format is irrelevant to the H263 encoding in GnomeMeeting. As long as there's no generic video codec hook in OpenH323 there's no way to get an unpatched GnomeMeeting to speak H.263. For now there's only the chance of using the old patches from CVS which have been rolled back until OpenH323 has the described generic hook. You camera will most likely speak V4L, V4L2 or AVC and be from there converted to the streaming formats of H.26x, that's why your camera doesn't need to speak H.263 itself. =20 > Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is same as H.263. So does that mean > that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263 support. > =20 MPEG-4 is a general video description in terms of standards. DivX and XviD are the non-streaming versions, H.264 is the streaming version of MPEG-4. H.263 is the streaming version of MPEG-2 and H.261 of MPEG-1. (please Craig correct me if i'm wrong) That's about the same discussion as why Ogg Speex (streaming format) isn't Ogg Vorbis (non-streaming format). They use the same ideas of codec design, but have different targets in terms of stream loss and connection reliability vs. compactation and image quality. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDOZBvdkzt4X+wX8RAqoVAJ4yfO4qkFM7bpEVs6RhOyzfWlO6dwCbBewI syW8ipIClA/aKk5GvIK+0OA= =Szl1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8-- From lurch@gmx.li Fri Feb 11 13:34:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CE43B0A54 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:34:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27118-05 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F83D3B0EE2 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:32:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IBR00917FILQZ@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1BIWj1a008310 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:45 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 1481 invoked from network); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:32:45 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:32:45 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:33 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support In-reply-to: <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502111932.42951.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:34:10 -0000 --nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 18:07 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi Sharma, > > > Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is same as H.263. So does that mean > > that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263 support. > > MPEG-4 is a general video description in terms of standards. DivX and > XviD are the non-streaming versions, H.264 is the streaming version of > MPEG-4. H.263 is the streaming version of MPEG-2 and H.261 of MPEG-1. > (please Craig correct me if i'm wrong) Mpeg-4 Part 2 is also known as DivX and Xvid. Although Mpeg-4 offers many=20 things Mpeg-2 does not, especially in terms of higher level object=20 representations, but in reality they don't differ much. The better coding=20 efficiency of Mpeg-4 is only due to some improvements in the details of the= =20 coding scheme. Mpeg-4 has a higher resolution for the motion compensation,= =20 offers different sizes for the motion compensation blocks and some other=20 niceties. H.263 is more or less the same as Mpeg-2, H.263+ is more or less= =20 the same as Mpeg-4 Part 2. Mpeg-4 Part 10 is also known as AVC or H.264 (in contrast to the older=20 standards, MPEG and ITU have created a joint project and the standards are= =20 this time not only similar, but exactly the same). Part 10 is based on the= =20 works of Part 2 and h.263+, so again it is based on the same coding=20 principles (DCT and Motion Compensation), but it offers again more=20 flexibility in the details of coding. It introduces some new ideas like CAB= AC=20 instead of Huffman coding, which seems to be very efficient ... > That's about the same discussion as why Ogg Speex (streaming format) > isn't Ogg Vorbis (non-streaming format). They use the same ideas of > codec design, but have different targets in terms of stream loss and > connection reliability vs. compactation and image quality. Here you are completely wrong. Speex is speech coding. The coding design is= =20 based on a model of speech synthesis - The oscilation of the vocal chord ha= s=20 a fundamental frequency, this fundamental frequency is transmitted, the=20 higher frequencies of the vocal chord are formed by the oral apparatus, whi= ch=20 can be thought of as a filter system, whose coefficients are transferred,=20 too. These principles are used by every speech codec in use. Vorbis (as mp3) are modelled after the human aural system. Quiet tones are= =20 masked by louder tones of a similar frequency, so you have to transfer only= =20 the louder tone. This difference is the reason for music transferred over a speech codec oft= en=20 sounding bad. If the music is similar to spoken language (A solo vocalist, = a=20 single trumpet or even a violin), it sounds quite good, but transferring a= =20 drum or a full band or orchestra wont work well. If a codec is suited for streaming depends most times not on the codec itse= lf,=20 but on the container format (.avi, .mov, .ogg, .mp4). Critical for realtime= =20 streaming (Audio/Video conference, Live TV) are coding delays introduced by= =20 the codec. Hope this clarifys the differences, Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=C3=BCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDPpKb39KPYz+qlMRAuxVAJ9wG/Z2eLrfbWtDxIIkBOhyIPOUywCfas2f 02wiQ5BdTg9HXTPJqrhgj/E= =aBS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf-- From franz@iptelenet.com Fri Feb 11 18:44:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046C23B0B49 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:44:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11715-09 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:44:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.iptelenet.com (sql.iptelenet.com [82.133.46.42]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBF93B0DAD for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:44:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from PortegeXP by iptelenet.com (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000044519.msg for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:43:53 +0000 Message-ID: <003b01c51093$8fc2c370$3200a8c0@PortegeXP> From: "Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet)" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1108124847.8061.215.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:44:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Authenticated-Sender: franz@iptelenet.com X-Spam-Processed: sql.iptelenet.com, Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:43:53 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.133.46.45 X-Return-Path: franz@iptelenet.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Franz J Ehrengruber \(iptelenet\)" , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:44:18 -0000 > Nothing can say what will happen tomorrow. (Skype) > With GM you have the real Freedom. You can do what you > want with it. Even start you own business around it as long as > you stick to the rules defined by its license. You can expect > this software to work not only today by also tomorrow. Well said Jerome. Regards, Franz. From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 11 23:27:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01D23B0735 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:27:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22995-09 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:27:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE82F3B0061 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:27:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl25 ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:57:41 +0530 Message-ID: <008d01c510bb$1de4f480$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: , "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com><1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> <200502111932.42951.lurch@gmx.li> Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:57:09 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2005 04:27:41.0453 (UTC) FILETIME=[30DB3BD0:01C510BB] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:27:18 -0000 hi, Thanks for this information. So if H.263 is as good as MPEG-2 card, so does that mean that I can have MPEG-2 based card for the support of H.263. Actually my problem is that how to support H.263 codec in GnomemMeeting. Please correct me if I am wrong. And can anyone please tell me any such card. Actually I need to freeze some H/W requirements for this. One more thing related to the Camera Query. It means I have to patch GnomeMeeting for the support of H.263. But I have patched the OpenH323 with the famous ffmpeg library which voxgratia says that it is H.263 codec support. So does that mean that I need to separately patch my GnomeMeeting with H.263 codec support. If yes then can you please tell me from where can I get that patch. And also from the discussion from you and Mr. Kilian I understood that I can have any WebCam/PTZ Cam for my Videoconferencing application which is supported by Linux. Is that true or I am making some mistake. Anyway thanks for the help. Regards, Ashutosh Sharma. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Bruens" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 12:02 AM Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > From yochanon@yahoo.com Sat Feb 12 04:48:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD85D3B06F8 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:48:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03523-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:48:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from outbound4.mail.tds.net (outbound4.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605223B06D8 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:48:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from prsstnnas01-pool0-a243.prsstn.tds.net (prsstnnas01-pool0-a243.prsstn.tds.net [69.21.62.243]) by outbound4.mail.tds.net (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j1C9mQNG010871 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:48:27 -0600 (CST) From: JB To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:50:08 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502120350.08819.yochanon@yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Trying to build a SuSE 9.2 rpm, but... X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yochanon@yahoo.com, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:48:30 -0000 Hi gang, I just downloaded the latest tarbal of gnomemeeting and did this in a terminal to try and make a tarball: rpmbuild -ts gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz Unfortunately I'm not very good at this kind of thing, having not done it very many times. This is what was returned: error: Name field must be present in package: (main package) error: Version field must be present in package: (main package) error: Release field must be present in package: (main package) error: Summary field must be present in package: (main package) error: Group field must be present in package: (main package) error: License field must be present in package: (main package) So, if anyone has any ideas what I need to do to fix this to be able to make an rpm out of this, I'd sure be grateful. Remember to try and keep it kinda simple, if possible, heh. Thanks, John From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 07:54:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002963B0D71 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:54:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12958-05 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:54:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2181A3B0D68 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:54:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwn3-00088b-UR for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:26 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwn1-00015E-MY for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <008d01c510bb$1de4f480$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> <200502111932.42951.lurch@gmx.li> <008d01c510bb$1de4f480$1970640a@Samyak.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1108212863.7324.7.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:54:31 -0000 --=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharma, > Thanks for this information. So if H.263 is as good as MPEG-2 card, so > does that mean that I can have MPEG-2 based card for the support of H.263= . > Actually my problem is that how to support H.263 codec in GnomemMeeting. > Please correct me if I am wrong. > And can anyone please tell me any such card. > Actually I need to freeze some H/W requirements for this. I'm not aware that any hardware acceleration is currently working with the ffmpeg in OpenH323. But this is the wrong list to ask for this. Maybe Craig can comment on how to use some modern MPEG-2 accelleration of current VGA cards to achieve this (if there is any solution so far). Yet from a GM point of view, that's all within OpenH323 and all GM would do is ask it to send H263 with the video-feed derived from PWLib. Nothing of the transcoding is done in GnomeMeeting, only the user frontend to control the libs is within the GnomeMeeting code (and ILS and stuff - but that's nothing to do with H.263). > One more thing related to the Camera Query. It means I have to patch > GnomeMeeting for the support of H.263. But I have patched the OpenH323 wi= th > the famous ffmpeg library which voxgratia says that it is H.263 codec > support. So does that mean that I need to separately patch my GnomeMeetin= g > with H.263 codec support. If yes then can you please tell me from where c= an > I get that patch. There is no public place where we host it. It gotta be in CVS though and maybe somenoe from this ML still has a copy of it and will share it with you. But yes, you're right that you need both support in OpenH323 to do the actual coding *and* support in GnomeMeeting to ask for this encoding to actually happen. The GnomeMeeting patch is needed to make the handshake recognize H263 as valid local codec (for it's not generic and therefore not "published" alone by patching OpenH323). > And also from the discussion from you and Mr. Kilian I understood that I = can > have any WebCam/PTZ Cam for my Videoconferencing application which is > supported by Linux. Is that true or I am making some mistake. *g* my name is european notation, i.e. Kilian is my first name. ;) Yes, you're right. The video signal is received by whatever comes through pwlib and then fed into OpenH323 for recoding. That means anything that PWLib can display will work (currently V4L, V4L2, AVC and DC cams). None of the WLAN (802.11b/g/a) cams will work and neither will JPEG-cams unless they have a V4L or V4L2 interface driver. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDfx+vdkzt4X+wX8RAroPAJwJTpU7Z9eG2MNQbT0uY6P8ZUapiwCfZdn9 DOpJNfk/AwH+ZhLirNQJJGo= =0e6Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W-- From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 07:56:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE9C3B09DC for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:56:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12994-06 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:56:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145F83B07B9 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:56:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwor-00089I-B5; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:17 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwop-000162-CI; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:15 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:15 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: yochanon@yahoo.com, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502120350.08819.yochanon@yahoo.com> References: <200502120350.08819.yochanon@yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1108212974.7324.10.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Trying to build a SuSE 9.2 rpm, but... X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:56:24 -0000 --=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi John, > rpmbuild -ts gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz we don't ship a *.spec in the tarball. Therefore this won't work. You need to use the src.rpms for your distro if you need to rebuild binary rpms. However we don't recommend building from source as there's a zillion problems around to get rid of for a working GnomeMeeting. Thus if there is a ready-to-be-installed rpm for your distro, please use it. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDfzuvdkzt4X+wX8RAnFPAJ4hTfXNBR9+nNQWKh7kSoNYgNCVNwCfUoHv ty/p5OFokfro8g/Ck3ZxOBI= =9uYF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb-- From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sat Feb 12 09:41:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8954E3B080E for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18830-01 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C634A3B0CBE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from j3c20.j.pppool.de ([85.74.60.32] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzyT2-0001mr-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:41:52 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzyT8-0004mV-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:41:58 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:41:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:41:55 -0000 Damien, Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 15:48 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.812 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 > > Source signal address ip$119.152.191.172:1720 and TCP peer address > > ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510 indicate remote endpoint is behind NAT > > The remote endpoint is not behind NAT. That's a bug in the openh323 > release shipped with GM 1.2 when using ipv6, it will be fixed when we > release 1.2.1. I am running the standard Debian setup: -> gnomemeeting 1.0.2, -> openh323 1.13.5.4 Do you see any problems with these versions? rdorsch@paddy:~$ dpkg -s gnomemeeting Package: gnomemeeting Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: gnome Installed-Size: 7240 Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo Architecture: i386 Version: 1.0.2-7 Depends: libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.7.2), libaudiofile0 (>= 0.2.3-4), libbonobo2-0 (>= 2.8.0), libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.5.4), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libesd0 (>= 0.2.29-1) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.29-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3), libgconf2-4 (>= 2.8.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.4.7), libgnome2-0 (>= 2.8.0), libgnomecanvas2-0 (>= 2.6.0), libgnomeui-0 (>= 2.8.0), libgnomevfs2-0 (>= 2.8.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.4.4), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libldap2 (>= 2.1.17-1), libopenh323-1.13.2 (>= 1.13.5), liborbit2 (>= 1:2.10.0), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.6.0), libpopt0 (>= 1.7), libpt-1.6.3, libsdl1.2debian (>> 1.2.7+1.2.8), libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxml2 (>= 2.6.11), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), gconf2 (>= 2.6.2-1), libpt-plugins-oss | libpt-plugins-alsa, libpt-plugins-v4l | libpt-plugins-avc | libpt-plugins-dc Recommends: libpt-plugins-alsa, libpt-plugins-v4l, libpt-plugins-avc, libpt-plugins-dc Description: The GnomeMeeting Voice Over IP Suite H.323 compatible videoconferencing and VOIP/IP-Telephony application that allows you to make audio and video calls to remote users with H.323 hardware or software (such as Microsoft Netmeeting). . It supports all modern videoconferencing features, such as registering to an ILS directory, gatekeeper support, making multi-user conference calls using an external MCU, using modern Quicknet telephony cards, and making PC-To-Phone calls. rdorsch@paddy:~$ rdorsch@paddy:~$ dpkg -s libopenh323-1.13.2 Package: libopenh323-1.13.2 Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: libs Installed-Size: 9860 Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team Architecture: i386 Source: openh323 Version: 1.13.5.4-4 > > I'm not sure it triggers the problem as even with that bug, it should > work. > > But I see this : > 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 > Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 set to > EndedByNoAccept I see that only when I activated forwarding on the workstation. When forwarding is not activated, the call is not ended (by the workstation?). What does this exactly mean? Does my laptop end the forwarding request from the workstation? I can call from my laptop the gnomemeeting on the workstation directly. The other way round I cannot try right now, because I am away from my workstation (except you know how to initiate a gnomemeeting call from the command line). > > I do not know your IP addresses, but I see no forwarding being done. Are The IP address of my laptop is not in the gnomemeeting log on the workstation. The picto of gnomemeeting has the green arrow and gconftool reports that forwarding is enabled: rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/always_forward true rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host 119.145.170.31 rdorsch@paddy:~$ > you sure it is enabled? Hmm...that's harder than I expected. But I learn a lot ;-) Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 09:52:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DF03B0796 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:52:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19441-02 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:52:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649303B076C for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:52:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Czycs-0001H9-Gk for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:02 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czycq-0002Jg-Kq for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:00 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:00 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:52:08 -0000 --=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, > I am running the standard Debian setup: > -> gnomemeeting 1.0.2,=20 > -> openh323 1.13.5.4 >=20 > Do you see any problems with these versions? using IPv6: Yes. That's not a flaw of the Debian packaging, but a bug in openh323 that will vanish with the Mimas uploads which aren't yet ready for uploading. the only fix for now is to run without ipv6 or to be called over IPv6. :-P The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDhgQvdkzt4X+wX8RAgIxAJ9Qt9R3GIqAQaHydGyRwd79Jno/eQCeIMjs lNop7X8ffe2DFFbQU766qXI= =2pFL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1-- From jerome@coffeebreaks.org Sat Feb 12 11:22:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0762F3B0B98 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:22:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24176-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:22:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no [62.101.193.41]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C48B3B0AFC for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:22:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from dolcevita.localnet (host-81-191-122-9.bluecom.no [81.191.122.9]) by s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271ED338210 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:22:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dolcevita.localnet) by dolcevita.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D002j-0000Vh-O2 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:22:49 +0100 From: Jerome Lacoste To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CoffeeBreaks Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:22:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1108225369.28263.59.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] SIP interoperability question? GM + VoIP SIP service on same LAN X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:22:55 -0000 Hi, I am about to get a VoIP SIP service at home [1]. Gives me free phone calls from PC to phone all over Europe for a low price. I saw that GM is to support SIP in the close future. I am just wondering what does that mean in terms of interoperability. Could I have conflicts if on the same LAN I have both GnomeMeeting (SIP compatible) and this adapter [2] to which my phone will be connected? Other question: will people with GM be able to call me directly on my phone? (that's probably a question I should keep to my service provider) [1] http://www.telio.no [2] http://www.telio.no/faq/?138 From yochanon@yahoo.com Sat Feb 12 11:44:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C2E3B0B98 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25434-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from web40422.mail.yahoo.com (web40422.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.92.33]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 394E43B0EBF for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 99309 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Feb 2005 16:44:26 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=59TwRLeABLbtX6EmKEvjIBqHtMDx5EHdruqux+NicGbtMv6UWLHPCIa7vzag0vGtNfLvn2xqjlwCkjt/l+FeoHFgP5c8Dw9g6XlfNiFLtlljJc615YUV8raqzCyFiGt0Gi75PDcB/oZmUMQY5k93MOFDqKKYggGwDAoiMLuNEyo= ; Message-ID: <20050212164426.99307.qmail@web40422.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.21.62.150] by web40422.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:44:26 PST Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:44:26 -0800 (PST) From: John Berger Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Trying to build a SuSE 9.2 rpm, but... To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108212974.7324.10.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:44:29 -0000 --- Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi John, > > > rpmbuild -ts gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > we don't ship a *.spec in the tarball. Therefore this won't work. You > need to use the src.rpms for your distro if you need to rebuild binary > rpms. However we don't recommend building from source as there's a > zillion problems around to get rid of for a working GnomeMeeting. Thus > if there is a ready-to-be-installed rpm for your distro, please use it. > > -- > Best regards, > Kilian Aha! I guess that would explain it, heh. Thanks, Kilian. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sat Feb 12 14:00:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884E93B08B5 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:00:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00433-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:00:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1573B08AD for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:00:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from j3c20.j.pppool.de ([85.74.60.32] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D02Uu-0002Gw-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:00:04 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D02Uz-0006BK-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:00:09 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:00:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:00:07 -0000 Hi Kilian, thanks for your quick reply. Am Samstag, 12. Februar 2005 15:52 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi Rainer, > > > I am running the standard Debian setup: > > -> gnomemeeting 1.0.2, > > -> openh323 1.13.5.4 > > > > Do you see any problems with these versions? > > using IPv6: Yes. That's not a flaw of the Debian packaging, but a bug in > openh323 that will vanish with the Mimas uploads which aren't yet ready > for uploading. the only fix for now is to run without ipv6 or to be > called over IPv6. :-P Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem comes up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make sense for you? > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest version is 1.12.2 On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 What version I should watch out for? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 21:27:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5C83B1014 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:27:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20654-02 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:27:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428B13B1009 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:27:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D09UE-0007uJ-89 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:50 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D09UC-0001X9-EN for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:48 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:48 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:27:53 -0000 --=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, > Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem com= es=20 > up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make sense f= or=20 > you? as long as IPv4 notation-compatibility notation in IPv6 is used, there will be problems. Thus if your forwarding is to an ipv4 host, yes. > > > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). >=20 > I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest=20 > version is 1.12.2 >=20 > On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 >=20 > What version I should watch out for? For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these days to get the autobuilder script back online. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDrsjvdkzt4X+wX8RAs0KAJ9m7xweM0AbdTn9EmjJMUkjyNy34ACZAUGd NkZgTfOSP9VvUAUxYJOLnLQ= =oY6l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ-- From xtinab@web.de Sun Feb 13 12:54:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1773B0E23 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:54:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03690-08 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:54:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from fmmailgate04.web.de (fmmailgate04.web.de [217.72.192.242]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1435A3B0932 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:54:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by fmmailgate04.web.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/webde Linux 0.7) with SMTP id j1DHrJ2o016010 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:54:20 +0100 Received: from [80.109.10.151] by freemailng1703.web.de with HTTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:54:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:54:15 +0100 Message-Id: <400064069@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Christina Boeckler" To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Precedence: fm-user Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] dsp0 opened but not readable X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:54:24 -0000 hi i just installed gnomemeeting on my intel-debian box and i get this error, when i use oss - the other option quicknet does not find any devices, alsa is not available, although installed : Cannot use the audio device The selected audio device (/dev/dsp0) was successfully opened but it is impossible to read data from this device. Please check your audio setup. in the faq i read, that another program is blocking my soundcard, but there is no other prog running, as ps shows the rights for /dev/dsp0 are set correctly, as my user is member of the group audio, which has rw rights and normally sound works - xmms at least. any idea, where i can look further ? thanx tina __________________________________________________________ Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min. weltweit telefonieren! http://freephone.web.de/?mc=021201 From jerome@coffeebreaks.org Sun Feb 13 13:05:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615CB3B10E0 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:05:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04311-02 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no [62.101.193.41]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CB33B0E22 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:05:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from dolcevita.localnet (host-81-191-122-9.bluecom.no [81.191.122.9]) by s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3CD338391 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:05:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dolcevita.localnet) by dolcevita.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0O7G-0001Te-Lu for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:05:06 +0100 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dsp0 opened but not readable From: Jerome Lacoste To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <400064069@web.de> References: <400064069@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CoffeeBreaks Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:05:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1108317906.28263.67.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:05:14 -0000 On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 18:54 +0100, Christina Boeckler wrote: > hi > > i just installed gnomemeeting on my intel-debian box and i get this error, when i use oss - the other option quicknet does not find any devices, alsa is not available, although installed : > > Cannot use the audio device > > The selected audio device (/dev/dsp0) was successfully opened but it is impossible to read data from this device. Please check your audio setup. > > in the faq i read, that another program is blocking my soundcard, but there is no other prog running, as ps shows Do you base this last comment on ps output? Have you tried to use fuser? fuser /dev/dsp0 Jerome From kk@verfaction.de Sun Feb 13 14:17:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3CB3B0867 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:17:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07144-05 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:17:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690493B06E6 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D0PFZ-0007Ml-El for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:45 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0PFX-0000yI-GB for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:43 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:43 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <400064069@web.de> References: <400064069@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1108322263.11658.35.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dsp0 opened but not readable X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:17:50 -0000 --=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Christina, > any idea, where i can look further ? if you have setup ALSA without OSS emulation, then try installing libpt-plugins-alsa and use that. If you only have OSS drivers installed it's recommended anyway to upgrade them to ALSA for OSS doesn't do recording and playback at the same time. The only way to make OSS in GnomeMeeting work for most drivers is to use OSS-emulation for ALSA. Jos=E9 Carlos Garc=EDa Sogo reckons that OSS is however mandantory to be th= e primary recommend audio plugin for SARGE ships with OSS drivers as default (even though those drivers for the vast majority won't work with GnomeMeeting). Details on ALSA are in /usr/share/doc/gnomemeeting/README.Debian. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCD6fXvdkzt4X+wX8RAnlLAJ9dvWfX3Q0ItRauYY+NTKmz4Z8p9QCbBhX/ 7+AvUgL0yUId0K3QzyI1n9k= =KOwE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz-- From dsandras@seconix.com Sun Feb 13 14:32:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7E23B1032 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:32:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07873-02 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:32:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAB63B1126 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:31:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (8-98.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.98.8]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67ED1B3FE for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:34:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SIP interoperability question? GM + VoIP SIP service on same LAN From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108225369.28263.59.camel@dolcevita.localnet> References: <1108225369.28263.59.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:31:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1108323103.3182.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:32:12 -0000 Le samedi 12 février 2005 à 17:22 +0100, Jerome Lacoste a écrit : > Hi, I am about to get a VoIP SIP service at home [1]. Gives me free > phone calls from PC to phone all over Europe for a low price. > > I saw that GM is to support SIP in the close future. I am just wondering > what does that mean in terms of interoperability. > > Could I have conflicts if on the same LAN I have both GnomeMeeting (SIP > compatible) and this adapter [2] to which my phone will be connected? > I think not. > > Other question: will people with GM be able to call me directly on my > phone? (that's probably a question I should keep to my service provider) > Yes, it should work, but it depends on your provider. But technically, it is possible. > > [1] http://www.telio.no > [2] http://www.telio.no/faq/?138 > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From ajtim@ctel.net Sun Feb 13 20:12:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EED3B0D82 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26455-10 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from a.smtp.taconic.net (outgoing-1.taconic.net [205.231.144.133]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB89F3B0F62 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:23 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 4254 invoked by uid 0); 14 Feb 2005 01:12:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (216.227.92.50) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 01:12:23 -0000 From: Mitja To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:12:37 -0000 Hi! My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. GM didn't recognize my sound card. I don't have a problem with other applications. Please help me. Thanks, Mitja From 1.41421@gmail.com Mon Feb 14 02:05:34 2005 Return-Path: <1.41421@gmail.com> X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305A93B120D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:05:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08930-07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:05:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923013B120C for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:05:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so573493wra for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I+ZN0X790v37h36IR9z2pwf07PZENXihAtflHvu6JTNWfHYBqP24hqA+mieovYx//nwG0wuZKZv3jikLAQN4r9xwbA0+JN8cBhMu7a9ptd3LlUVjmzGyPnZxTMmzLi6scpKl7ceUdGJLy+6C7yswpDQan6wG68hPPg+qjE06gZY= Received: by 10.54.41.16 with SMTP id o16mr10825wro; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.7.13 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 From: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com>, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:05:34 -0000 I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? Feedback will be much appreciated. From fujimori@ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp Mon Feb 14 02:13:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F493B11C1 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:13:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09263-07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:13:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp [133.9.152.153]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0E93B120D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:12:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (8.12.10/8.11.3) with ESMTP id j1E7CLfN055726; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:12:21 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from fujimori@ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp) Message-Id: <200502140712.j1E7CLfN055726@ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp> To: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com>, GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 PST." Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:12:21 +0900 From: Yoriaki FUJIMORI X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:13:24 -0000 I am interesting in what you would like to do eventually. yoriaki fujimori From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 14 03:26:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C922D3B1228 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:26:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12748-01 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:26:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280F43B0B40 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:26:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0F01B2DB; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:30:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , ajtim@ctel.net In-Reply-To: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:26:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:26:54 -0000 Le dimanche 13 février 2005 à 20:12 -0500, Mitja a écrit : > Hi! > > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. > > GM didn't recognize my sound card. I don't have a problem with other > applications. > Please help me. > Can you be more precise? I don't understand what "didn't recognize my soundcard" means? Also, what audio plugin are you using? > Thanks, > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 14 03:28:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D6B3B1228 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:28:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12886-04 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:28:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BEF3B130A for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:28:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34902C475; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:31:54 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:28:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:28:47 -0000 Le dimanche 13 février 2005 à 23:05 -0800, JCA a écrit : > I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same > LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not > and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it > be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the > gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? > > The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be > done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far > without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the > sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the > opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike > connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? > > Feedback will be much appreciated. ESD and Arts would solve the problem, but the fact is that they are both of very bad quality when it comes to capture/playback at the same time. They are thus unusable with GnomeMeeting. You probably have to use other sound daemons, with low-latency, like MAS or Jack. In that case, you will have to code a plugin for GnomeMeeting supporting the sound daemon of your choice. Hope it helps, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From sime@anticd.org Mon Feb 14 06:26:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAFB3B13BE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:26:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24155-07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:26:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.193]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3D63B138D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:26:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (c211-30-187-243.rivrw1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.187.243]) by mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1EBPv78029049; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:25:58 +1100 Message-ID: <42108AC9.4050307@anticd.org> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:26:01 +1100 From: Simon Males User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> In-Reply-To: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:26:11 -0000 > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. You'll OSS drivers. Guessing but I think libpt-plugins-oss does the trick. -- Simon Males No More AOL CDs Australia - www.anticd.org From ajtim@ctel.net Mon Feb 14 09:13:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC4D3B1343 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02071-10 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from c.smtp.taconic.net (outgoing.taconic.net [205.231.144.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3EB83B1339 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:04 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 16590 invoked by uid 0); 14 Feb 2005 14:13:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (216.227.92.85) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 14:13:03 -0000 From: Mitja To: Damien Sandras Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502140913.12840.ajtim@ctel.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:13:08 -0000 On Monday 14 February 2005 03:26, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le dimanche 13 f=E9vrier 2005 =E0 20:12 -0500, Mitja a =E9crit : > > Hi! > > > > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. > > > > GM didn't recognize my sound card. I don't have a problem with other > > applications. > > Please help me. > > Can you be more precise? I don't understand what "didn't recognize my > soundcard" means? > > Also, what audio plugin are you using? > > > Thanks, GnomeMeeting ''said'' that i don't have a sound card. I have a sound card a= nd=20 works. I use ALSA. From kk@verfaction.de Mon Feb 14 09:16:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0403B1387 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02494-02 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A85A3B13A6 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D0h1C-0002dj-Ji; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:06 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0h1A-0003mo-Or; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:04 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:04 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502140913.12840.ajtim@ctel.net> References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> <200502140913.12840.ajtim@ctel.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1108390564.5525.41.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:16:21 -0000 --=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mitja, > GnomeMeeting ''said'' that i don't have a sound card. I have a sound card= and=20 > works. I use ALSA. and you don't have the pwlib alsa plugin installed. Fix that and it'll work, i.e. install the pwlib-plugins-alsa rpm. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCELKkvdkzt4X+wX8RApDVAJ4oB1XAFHdeaM+vkBGdKoleQX3c6ACfaQUu F2mm1Y4MDs92r23SHYIokT4= =XKrJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z-- From lurch@gmx.li Mon Feb 14 14:06:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822453B118E for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:06:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21919-05 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:06:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7083B07DA for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:05:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IBX0020511YSH@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1EJ5vYM020058 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:57 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 10155 invoked from network); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:05:57 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:05:57 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:49 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live In-reply-to: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502142005.55335.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:06:11 -0000 --nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 02:12 schrieb Mitja: > Hi! > > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. Where did you get the RPMs (GM, pwlib, h323) from? 9.2 does not ship GM 1.2. Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCEPaTb39KPYz+qlMRAjlSAKCh+hH6NCoAgWD0gBpBomCn4qwE8ACeIyoJ SrIwgQutWJtkgs742GcqQx4= =9He3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua-- From 1.41421@gmail.com Mon Feb 14 14:14:41 2005 Return-Path: <1.41421@gmail.com> X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA3B3B140C for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:14:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22356-03 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:14:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724663B0A72 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:14:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so670322wra for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=O/O293+uUj9CPYGjbbrPjRW2YnFj50hmG1gnW8IPaLNkIYa+O84KBXfLXDGQJs1s9dr+KSvK1CbScZZ3E/84yfh9dD7wYrtVaz4j9JceVgaCOSwmo+q6ObLFlK4zvGNQawBoiY8DPfYQgq3R9vZzqawpshFu7EwnN4/1EBgstmM= Received: by 10.54.16.9 with SMTP id 9mr204409wrp; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.7.13 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 From: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> To: Damien Sandras Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting In-Reply-To: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com>, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:14:41 -0000 On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:28:32 +0100, Damien Sandras w= rote: > Le dimanche 13 f=E9vrier 2005 =E0 23:05 -0800, JCA a =E9crit : > > I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same > > LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not > > and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it > > be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the > > gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? > > > > The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be > > done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far > > without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the > > sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the > > opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike > > connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? > > > > Feedback will be much appreciated. >=20 > ESD and Arts would solve the problem, but the fact is that they are both > of very bad quality when it comes to capture/playback at the same time. > They are thus unusable with GnomeMeeting. >=20 > You probably have to use other sound daemons, with low-latency, like MAS > or Jack. In that case, you will have to code a plugin for GnomeMeeting > supporting the sound daemon of your choice. >=20 > Hope it helps, Thanks for your feedback. Well, this is a bit of a bummer, for I do not think I have the necessary expertise to develop the necessary plugin :-( Oh, well. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 14 14:20:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E533B15BC for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:20:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22779-06 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:19:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F7C3B15B4 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (175-84.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.84.175]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73504B5C6; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:23:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:19:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1108408796.3179.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:20:00 -0000 We will probably have a JACK plugin at some point, but I can not tell when exactly :-/ Le lundi 14 février 2005 à 11:14 -0800, JCA a écrit : > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:28:32 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le dimanche 13 février 2005 à 23:05 -0800, JCA a écrit : > > > I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same > > > LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not > > > and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it > > > be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the > > > gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? > > > > > > The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be > > > done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far > > > without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the > > > sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the > > > opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike > > > connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? > > > > > > Feedback will be much appreciated. > > > > ESD and Arts would solve the problem, but the fact is that they are both > > of very bad quality when it comes to capture/playback at the same time. > > They are thus unusable with GnomeMeeting. > > > > You probably have to use other sound daemons, with low-latency, like MAS > > or Jack. In that case, you will have to code a plugin for GnomeMeeting > > supporting the sound daemon of your choice. > > > > Hope it helps, > > Thanks for your feedback. Well, this is a bit of a bummer, for I do > not think I have the necessary expertise to develop the necessary > plugin :-( Oh, well. > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 03:58:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020233B1024 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:58:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07791-05 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:58:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342B73B0FED for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:58:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:28:53 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:28:16 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 08:58:53.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[127DBE10:01C51598] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:58:22 -0000 Hello All, I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 Gateway at my place. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh. From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 18 04:11:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F8C3B1044 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:11:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08868-09 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:11:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D4F3B0FD7 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:11:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCD11B32A for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:15:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:11:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:11:42 -0000 Hello, If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work with GnomeMeeting : a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. Hope it helps, Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hello All, > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > Gateway at my place. > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh. > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 04:51:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDDF3B0957 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:51:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11398-03 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:51:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8563B08B5 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:51:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:21:49 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:21:11 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 09:51:49.0437 (UTC) FILETIME=[773C96D0:01C5159F] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:51:15 -0000 Thanks sir. That was really helpful. =20 Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec only. SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). Also I got to know from your response that there are two service providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to know that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean I want a scenario to be like this:-=20 PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <=3D=3D>My ISP <=3D=3D=3D>Phone(P= OT/PSTN) Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > Hello, >=20 >=20 > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. >=20 > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > with GnomeMeeting : > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. >=20 > Hope it helps, >=20 > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a = =C3=A9crit : > > Hello All, > >=20 > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this.=20 > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > Gateway at my place. > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > > Ashutosh.=20 > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 18 05:05:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B753B0DC4 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12185-06 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08C73B0DB3 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:03:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6448C1B364 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:07:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:03:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:05:10 -0000 Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Thanks sir. > That was really helpful. > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > only. > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to know > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean > I want a scenario to be like this:- > > PC (GM) <===>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <==>My ISP <===>Phone(POT/PSTN) > Here is what you can have : PC (GM) <====> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <==> Your telco provider <====> Phone OR PC (GM) <====> PC-To-Phone provider <====> Phone > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh Sharma. > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. > > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > > with GnomeMeeting : > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > > > Hope it helps, > > > > Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > > Gateway at my place. > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 05:17:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5CC3B0C92 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:17:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13166-09 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36733B0A39 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:48:01 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:47:23 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 10:18:01.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[1FF61280:01C515A3] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:17:28 -0000 Yeah thanks. Definitely h/w is must. I mean I will be mostly going for Quicknet PhoneJack. So this means that I can use the services of My ISP with this GM and h/w. But what I asked about the OpenH323 PSTN Gateway codec support was that correct (if you can throw some light on that) or not? On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a = =C3=A9crit : > > Thanks sir. > > That was really helpful. =20 > > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 code= c > > only. > > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" > > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway > > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all > > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). > >=20 >=20 > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which > you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? >=20 > > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to kno= w > > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if > > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean > > I want a scenario to be like this:-=20 > >=20 > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <=3D=3D>My ISP <=3D=3D=3D>Pho= ne(POT/PSTN) > >=20 >=20 > Here is what you can have : >=20 > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <=3D=3D> Your= telco > provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone >=20 > OR >=20 > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> PC-To-Phone provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone >=20 > > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Hello, > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions= : > > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for examp= le > > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when yo= u > > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. > > >=20 > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able= to > > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are us= ing > > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > > > with GnomeMeeting : > > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > >=20 > > > Hope it helps, > > >=20 > > > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=83=C2=A9vrier 2005 =C3=83 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh = Sharma a =C3=83=C2=A9crit : > > > > Hello All, > > > >=20 > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeet= ing. > > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this.=20 > > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > > > Gateway at my place. > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Ashutosh.=20 > > > >=20 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 18 05:20:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980093B0A39 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:20:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13335-08 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:19:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAAB3B0E96 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B80A874 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:23:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:19:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:20:03 -0000 Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 15:47 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Yeah thanks. > Definitely h/w is must. I mean I will be mostly going for Quicknet > PhoneJack. So this means that I can use the services of My ISP with this > GM and h/w. Is your ISP also offering a normal phone line? > But what I asked about the OpenH323 PSTN Gateway codec support was that > correct (if you can throw some light on that) or not? > Yes it should be. Pay attention to the fact that there is no driver yet for kernel 2.6 for Quicknet cards. A more complicated alternative is to use Asterisk (www.asterisk.org). > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le vendredi 18 février 2005 Ã 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > Thanks sir. > > > That was really helpful. > > > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > > > only. > > > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" > > > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway > > > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all > > > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). > > > > > > > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which > > you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? > > > > > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > > > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to know > > > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if > > > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean > > > I want a scenario to be like this:- > > > > > > PC (GM) <===>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <==>My ISP <===>Phone(POT/PSTN) > > > > > > > Here is what you can have : > > > > PC (GM) <====> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <==> Your telco > > provider <====> Phone > > > > OR > > > > PC (GM) <====> PC-To-Phone provider <====> Phone > > > > > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : > > > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example > > > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you > > > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. > > > > > > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to > > > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > > > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using > > > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > > > > with GnomeMeeting : > > > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > > > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > > > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > > > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > > > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > > > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > > > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > > > > > > > Hope it helps, > > > > > > > > Le vendredi 18 février 2005 Ã 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > > > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. > > > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > > > > Gateway at my place. > > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > Ashutosh. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 06:41:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D679A3B0FAB for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:41:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18024-07 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:41:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5105D3B1058 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:41:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:11:57 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:11:19 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 11:41:57.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA012C90:01C515AE] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:41:23 -0000 Hi, Well that's true. But I think Asterix supports oh323 not OpenH323. I mean will it make any difference if I use OpenH323 + GM + OpenMCU+GnuGK+ Asterix PBX. I saw that whole code is in 'C' only. And its really a complex s/w. I hardly could understand a pin point of things from the help. Anyhow but how can I make call from GM (0.98) to a phone using Asterix. I mean whether I have to register it as application with Asterix. Truly speaking I don't understand that application registration funda. Thanks and Regards, Ashutosh. =20 On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:49, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 15:47 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a = =C3=A9crit : > > Yeah thanks. > > Definitely h/w is must. I mean I will be mostly going for Quicknet > > PhoneJack. So this means that I can use the services of My ISP with thi= s > > GM and h/w. >=20 > Is your ISP also offering a normal phone line? >=20 > > But what I asked about the OpenH323 PSTN Gateway codec support was that > > correct (if you can throw some light on that) or not? > >=20 >=20 > Yes it should be. Pay attention to the fact that there is no driver yet > for kernel 2.6 for Quicknet cards. >=20 > A more complicated alternative is to use Asterisk (www.asterisk.org). >=20 > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=83=C2=A9vrier 2005 =C3=83 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh = Sharma a =C3=83=C2=A9crit : > > > > Thanks sir. > > > > That was really helpful. =20 > > > > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > > > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I lo= oked > > > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 = codec > > > > only. > > > > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabiliti= es" > > > > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gate= way > > > > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose= all > > > > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version= ). > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which > > > you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? > > >=20 > > > > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > > > > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to= know > > > > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because= if > > > > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I = mean > > > > I want a scenario to be like this:-=20 > > > >=20 > > > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <=3D=3D>My ISP <=3D=3D=3D= >Phone(POT/PSTN) > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Here is what you can have : > > >=20 > > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <=3D=3D> = Your telco > > > provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone > > >=20 > > > OR > > >=20 > > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> PC-To-Phone provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone > > >=20 > > > > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solut= ions : > > > > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for e= xample > > > > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than whe= n you > > > > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line= . > > > > >=20 > > > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be = able to > > > > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several count= ries > > > > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you ar= e using > > > > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to = work > > > > > with GnomeMeeting : > > > > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That code= c is > > > > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls usi= ng > > > > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That w= ill > > > > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug= a > > > > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > > > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM= as > > > > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard an= d a > > > > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > > > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Hope it helps, > > > > >=20 > > > > > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=83=C6=92=C3=82=C2=A9vrier 2005 =C3=83=C6=92 = 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a =C3=83=C6=92=C3=82=C2=A9crit : > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through Gnome= Meeting. > > > > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this.=20 > > > > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be havin= g an > > > > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing call= s. > > > > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have Open= H323 > > > > > > Gateway at my place. > > > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > Ashutosh.=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > > >=20 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From devel@tootai.net Fri Feb 18 10:37:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3663B113D for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:37:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00712-06 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:37:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from mango.tootai.net (mango.tootai.net [217.11.129.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F0E3B108A for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:37:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (rob67-1-82-231-69-24.fbx.proxad.net [82.231.69.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by mango.tootai.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id j1IFawqI031817 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:36:59 +0100 Message-ID: <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:42:41 +0100 From: daniel huhardeaux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> In-Reply-To: <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:37:04 -0000 Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : >Hi, > Well that's true. But I think Asterix supports oh323 not OpenH323. I >mean will it make any difference if I use OpenH323 + GM + OpenMCU+GnuGK+ >Asterix PBX. > I saw that whole code is in 'C' only. And its really a complex s/w. I >hardly could understand a pin point of things from the help. > Anyhow but how can I make call from GM (0.98) to a phone using >Asterix. I mean whether I have to register it as application with >Asterix. Truly speaking I don't understand that application registration >funda. > > Asterisk has two h323 channels. I would suggest you to use the oh323 one's. Or you connect your GnuGK gatekeeper to asterisk via the oh323 channel, or you connect GM directly. In this case you will not be able to call to asterisk EndPoints with other h323 Endpoints connected to your GK. -- Daniel Huhardeaux ______ _____ _____ ______ ______ __ enum +48 32 285 5276 /_ _// _ // _ //_ _// __ // / IAX FWD +1 7009 422493 / / / // // // / / / / /_/ // / sip:101 h323:121 @voip./_/ /____//____/ /_/ /_/ /_//_/.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Fri Feb 18 18:23:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBB13B0AD2 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:23:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27081-03 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:23:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875143B0945 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:23:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from j128b.j.pppool.de ([85.74.18.139] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D2HSe-0001Yl-00 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:23:00 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D2HSq-0001GU-00 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:23:12 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:23:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502190023.12048.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:23:05 -0000 Hi Kilian, Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > days to get the autobuilder script back online. testing the debs would be ok for me. I am running an uptodate sarge. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 19 10:03:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3CF3B0789 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06898-10 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:03:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B9C3B0703 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:03:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499] (helo=[IPv6:3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499]) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D2W8z-0002Pe-MX for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:03:41 +0100 From: Kilian Krause To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:03:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1108825419.7144.13.camel@mars> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:03:45 -0000 --=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharma, [snip] > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > only. quoting Craig Southeren PSTNgw is phased out already. At least that was the info i got some days ago. You should thus use something like aefirion, asterisk, yate or isdnh323. Whatever your needs are. YMMV. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCF1VLvdkzt4X+wX8RAiLFAJwKrpe4cHI/j/4Ov66LIwg0ooIOhgCfdqCy w1Sh/YuPjkMFzYY8POHgjMk= =bwZZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv-- From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 19 10:06:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F433B06DD for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07180-03 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:06:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3F53B0703 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:06:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499] (helo=[IPv6:3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499]) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D2WBu-0002Rz-1W for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:06:42 +0100 From: Kilian Krause To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502190023.12048.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> <200502190023.12048.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:06:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1108825601.7144.16.camel@mars> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:06:45 -0000 --=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, Am Samstag, den 19.02.2005, 00:23 +0100 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > Hi Kilian, >=20 > Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously nee= d > > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > > days to get the autobuilder script back online. >=20 > testing the debs would be ok for me. I am running an uptodate sarge. the preliminary debs were built on a SID and will for now not install on SARGE afair. I hope i get the time to build sarge ones tomorrow or so. Will keep you posted as i have some ready (or verified that sarge has the required GNOME package dependencies by now - which it hadn't yet last time i tried) --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCF1YBvdkzt4X+wX8RAvx2AJ9cKjyvIkHMuT1CmVOjMox4yx3fdACfSpYK eYyIZ0AVJC1mXe2Bbro0pDs= =z7De -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J-- From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 21 00:26:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5DA3B0716 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22868-04 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780BA3B07C2 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:57:03 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:56:26 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2005 05:27:03.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9F17130:01C517D5] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:26:29 -0000 Hi Thanks, So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem is to have the s/w packages in C++. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 21:12, daniel huhardeaux wrote: > Ashutosh Sharma a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > >Hi, > > Well that's true. But I think Asterix supports oh323 not OpenH323. I > >mean will it make any difference if I use OpenH323 + GM + OpenMCU+GnuGK+ > >Asterix PBX. > > I saw that whole code is in 'C' only. And its really a complex s/w. I > >hardly could understand a pin point of things from the help. > > Anyhow but how can I make call from GM (0.98) to a phone using > >Asterix. I mean whether I have to register it as application with > >Asterix. Truly speaking I don't understand that application registration > >funda. > > =20 > > > Asterisk has two h323 channels. I would suggest you to use the oh323=20 > one's. Or you connect your GnuGK gatekeeper to asterisk via the oh323=20 > channel, or you connect GM directly. In this case you will not be able=20 > to call to asterisk EndPoints with other h323 Endpoints connected to=20 > your GK. From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 21 00:28:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEEC3B07C7 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:28:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23044-03 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:28:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1D23B075E for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:28:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:58:44 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108825419.7144.13.camel@mars> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108825419.7144.13.camel@mars> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108963687.3994.13.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:58:07 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2005 05:28:44.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[36298CA0:01C517D6] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:28:06 -0000 hi. Thanks, Well do you mean to say that PSTNgw is outdated now. Regards, A. Sharma. On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 20:33, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Sharma, > > [snip] > > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > > only. > > quoting Craig Southeren PSTNgw is phased out already. At least that was > the info i got some days ago. You should thus use something like > aefirion, asterisk, yate or isdnh323. Whatever your needs are. YMMV. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 21 04:01:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25623B1472 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:01:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32342-08 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:01:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBC23B15AE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:01:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9A41B598 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:06:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:01:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:01:38 -0000 Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi Thanks, > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and chan-h323. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 21 04:13:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39EF3B1636 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:13:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00800-10 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:13:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118013B1626 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:43:44 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108977185.3994.31.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:43:05 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2005 09:13:44.0515 (UTC) FILETIME=[A48E6930:01C517F5] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:13:43 -0000 yeah thanks, This means I can use all the features of Asterix for my OpenH323 based conferencing part. So as you mentioned it gives 2 channels. So this means that the programmer is having liberty to choose anyone. Also if I use Asterix or any other MediaG/W, then whether I need to change the source code for GnomeMeeting. I guess no. I have also seen PSTNgw and also read the features of Yate. Well but it doesn't seem that Yate supports quicknet h/w. So I am left with PSTNgw/Asterix only. Isn't this so? But in the previous mails I found that PSTNgw is outdated now. Is it so? Actually confusion gets create when you saw a lot of such projects and some supports the features that you need and some don't. Please guide me in this context. Thanks, Ashutosh Sharma. On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:31, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 21 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a =C3= =A9crit : > > Hi Thanks, > > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > >=20 >=20 > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and > chan-h323. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 21 04:30:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88D53B0C16 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:30:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02087-01 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:30:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1273B0A29 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:30:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041D21B4CA for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:35:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108977185.3994.31.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> <1108977185.3994.31.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:30:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1108978228.3411.32.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:30:30 -0000 Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 14:43 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > yeah thanks, > This means I can use all the features of Asterix for my OpenH323 based > conferencing part. So as you mentioned it gives 2 channels. So this > means that the programmer is having liberty to choose anyone. Also if I > use Asterix or any other MediaG/W, then whether I need to change the > source code for GnomeMeeting. I guess no. > no, gnomemeeting is an H.323 client, it will work with H.323 "servers". > I have also seen PSTNgw and also read the features of Yate. Well but > it doesn't seem that Yate supports quicknet h/w. So I am left with > PSTNgw/Asterix only. Isn't this so? But in the previous mails I found > that PSTNgw is outdated now. Is it so? > I don't know about that, but that's possible. Asterisk can use Quicknet hardware. > Actually confusion gets create when you saw a lot of such projects and > some supports the features that you need and some don't. > > Please guide me in this context. > Thanks, > Ashutosh Sharma. > > On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:31, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > Hi Thanks, > > > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > > > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > > > > > > > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and > > chan-h323. > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be Tue Feb 22 07:12:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70773B070D for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:12:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13878-02 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:12:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from spoolo3.tiscali.be (spoolo3.tiscali.be [62.235.13.169]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3311B3B0688 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:12:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [83.134.222.80] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by spoolo3.tiscali.be with esmtp (Tiscali.be http://www.tiscali.be) id 1D3YuN-00042e-Eg for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:12:55 +0100 Message-ID: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:15:42 +0000 From: Thierry Lepoint User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050221 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:59 -0000 Hello all, I installed GnomeMeeting-1.2.0 (Gentoo) in order to take advantge of the new PC-to-phone system. I obtained a regitration and a PIN numbers from "diamondcard.us". I encoded them in the configuration page of Gnomemeeting. How can I get a call to 32-2-5267356 (my office) in Belgium? My second question is that I have no access to the manual (in Help, "sommaire" is not activated). Many thanks in advance to take these question into account. Thierry -- web site : http://www.first30.org H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 22 07:22:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5933B09F6 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:22:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14371-04 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:22:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8006C3B0A3E for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:22:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5281B2C8 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:26:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> References: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:22:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:22:10 -0000 Hi, Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 14:15 +0000, Thierry Lepoint a écrit : > Hello all, > > I installed GnomeMeeting-1.2.0 (Gentoo) in order to take advantge of the > new PC-to-phone system. > I obtained a regitration and a PIN numbers from "diamondcard.us". I > encoded them in the configuration page of Gnomemeeting. > You need to get them from the GnomeMeeting window, not by direct access, but it seems correct for you. > How can I get a call to 32-2-5267356 (my office) in Belgium? > First thing is to check that your NAT configuration is correct and that you can do calls using GnomeMeeting and not the PC-To-Phone provider. Then, you can go in the preferences, Gatekeeper Settings, Choose "Gatekeeper Host" are registering method, click on Apply. When you see that you are registered in the general history, you are ready to do calls. Just call h323:003225267356 and it will work. When you want to do normal calls (GM to GM), you have to unregister from the gatekeeper. You can do this by going in the Gatekeeper settings, choose "Do not register" as registering method, click on Apply. When you see in the general history that you are unregistered, you are ready to do normal calls. > My second question is that I have no access to the manual (in Help, > "sommaire" is not activated). > That's a bug of the package of your gentoo. > Many thanks in advance to take these question into account. > Notice that 1.2.0 has a bug in the openh323 part, if you load your kernel with ipv6.o being loaded, it is *possible* that you have problems registering to the gatekeeper and doing calls. The fix is to wait for 1.2.1, or to unload ipv6.o from the kernel modules. > Thierry > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be Tue Feb 22 07:53:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175893B1674 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:53:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16321-05 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:52:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from spoolo3.tiscali.be (spoolo3.tiscali.be [62.235.13.169]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A1B3B1760 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:51:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [83.134.222.80] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by spoolo3.tiscali.be with esmtp (Tiscali.be http://www.tiscali.be) id 1D3ZVU-0006oF-Tw for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:51:17 +0100 Message-ID: <421B478B.5000707@tiscali.be> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:54:03 +0000 From: Thierry Lepoint User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050221 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us References: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:53:07 -0000 Damien Sandras wrote: >Hi, > >Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 14:15 +0000, Thierry Lepoint a écrit : > > >>Hello all, >> >>I installed GnomeMeeting-1.2.0 (Gentoo) in order to take advantge of the >>new PC-to-phone system. >>I obtained a regitration and a PIN numbers from "diamondcard.us". I >>encoded them in the configuration page of Gnomemeeting. >> >> >> > >You need to get them from the GnomeMeeting window, not by direct access, >but it seems correct for you. > > That's what I did. I entered GM --> Outils --> PC-to-phone and clicked on the the link entitled 'Create a GM count to PC-to-Phone'. This led me up to https://www.diamond.uss/exec/voip-login?act=sgn&spv=gnomemeeting". So I think it's OK. > > >>How can I get a call to 32-2-5267356 (my office) in Belgium? >> >> >> > >First thing is to check that your NAT configuration is correct and that >you can do calls using GnomeMeeting and not the PC-To-Phone provider. > > If I use the "Edition --> Preferences --> Page 5/10", a click on the button so as to detect NAT led 2 times to a blocking of the GM window. So I went to "Preferences -> General --> NAT. I have: "Activer traduction IP" "Activer vérification d'IP" "adresse NAT: IP_number" Then I went to GATEKEEPER: Host: Gatekeeper ID: not given Host: gk.ast.diamondcard.us Alias: my_count_number Passwd: my_number (both were provided by diamondcard.us) >Then, you can go in the preferences, Gatekeeper Settings, Choose >"Gatekeeper Host" are registering method, click on Apply. When you see >that you are registered in the general history, you are ready to do >calls. > >Just call h323:003225267356 and it will work. > > However I cannot get in touch with somebody: the answer is "Utilisateur non trouvé" >When you want to do normal calls (GM to GM), you have to unregister from >the gatekeeper. You can do this by going in the Gatekeeper settings, >choose "Do not register" as registering method, click on Apply. When you >see in the general history that you are unregistered, you are ready to >do normal calls. > > > OK, many thanks to draw my attention on this. >>My second question is that I have no access to the manual (in Help, >>"sommaire" is not activated). >> >> >> > >That's a bug of the package of your gentoo. > > > I am going to chekc bugzilla. >>Many thanks in advance to take these question into account. >> >> >> > >Notice that 1.2.0 has a bug in the openh323 part, if you load your >kernel with ipv6.o being loaded, it is *possible* that you have problems >registering to the gatekeeper and doing calls. The fix is to wait for >1.2.1, or to unload ipv6.o from the kernel modules. > > For the moment I am still in ipv4. No support enabled in the kernel for ipv6. Thanks for your help. > > >>Thierry >> >> >> -- web site : http://www.first30.org H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 22 08:06:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5665B3B0E26 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:06:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17929-02 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:06:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DFE3B1758 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:04:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DCF1B2DA for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:09:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <421B478B.5000707@tiscali.be> References: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> <421B478B.5000707@tiscali.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:04:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1109077460.4168.36.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:06:25 -0000 Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 14:54 +0000, Thierry Lepoint a écrit : > > > If I use the "Edition --> Preferences --> Page 5/10", a click on the > button so as to detect NAT led 2 times to a blocking of the GM window. Because you clicked several times on the button (known bug). Just click once, and wait, be patient, and you will get the result. > So I went to "Preferences -> General --> NAT. > I have: "Activer traduction IP" > "Activer vérification d'IP" > "adresse NAT: IP_number" And have you forwarded the required ports (if any) ? > Then I went to GATEKEEPER: > Host: Gatekeeper > ID: not given > Host: gk.ast.diamondcard.us > Alias: my_count_number > Passwd: my_number (both were provided by diamondcard.us) > Correct > However I cannot get in touch with somebody: the answer is "Utilisateur > non trouvé" > Does it register correctly with the GK? Are you sure of your NAT setup? That's the first thing to check (unfortunately) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 22 15:15:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD2D3B0752; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11885-10; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6503B06C5; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (30-89.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.89.30]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E241B227; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:20:24 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Sandras To: gnomemeeting-devel-list@gnome.org, gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:15:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1109103335.3441.11.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Newsforge article about GnomeMeeting X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:37 -0000 Hi all, there is a newsforge article about GnomeMeeting here : http://software.newsforge.com/software/05/02/17/1914207.shtml?tid=130&tid=150 -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Tue Feb 22 16:11:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB9B3B06A1 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14638-04 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170E93B0691 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3hJF-0002Zk-WB for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:11 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3hJC-0003hn-9p for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:06 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:06 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9" Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:11:15 -0000 --=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everybody, for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) -K.- -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Von: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo An: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Betreff: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source) Datum: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:47:10 -0500 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:48:46 +0100 Source: gnomemeeting Binary: gnomemeeting Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo Description:=20 gnomemeeting - The GnomeMeeting Voice Over IP Suite Closes: 272898 281215 282789 284437 284740 287234 Changes:=20 gnomemeeting (1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1) unstable; urgency=3Dlow . * New upstream release. Building against Mimas pwlib/openh323 release. + Release targeted to Sid. + Don't show useless dialog. (Closes: #284740) + GM is finished when GNOME session is closed. (Closes: #284437) * debian/control: build-depend on current pwlib/openh323 versions (Closes: #282789, #287234) . gnomemeeting (1.2.0-2) experimental; urgency=3Dlow . * Recompiled with new lipt-1.8.3 package. . gnomemeeting (1.2.0-1) experimental; urgency=3Dlow . * New upstream version. + Fixes problems with Logitec Quickcam (Closes: #281215) * Compiled using Atlas release of pwlib/openh323. * Merging changes made in versions 1.0.2-6 and -7. * Build-Depend on libhowl-dev, for enabling zeroconf support. * debian/watch: updated. * debian/patches: + 05_configure: deleted. Not needed anymore. + 10_relibtoolize: disabled. Upstream runs a up-to-date Sid system. + 99_update_libtool_files: deleted. No longer needed. . gnomemeeting (1.1.3cvs20040929-1) experimental; urgency=3Dlow . * CVS Snapshot. Date: 09-30-2004 + Preparation for 1.2 release + Do not use gconf any longer for storing server list (Closes: #272898) * debian/control: + Depends on new Pandora pwlib/openh323 release. + Added Build-Dependency on evolution-data-server-dev * debian/rules: + Using $(confflags) properly. * debian/patches: + 05_configure: updated to reflect pwlib/openh323 versions we're compiling with. + 10_relibtoolize: disabled, as autogen.sh for this sources has been = run in a Debian environment. Files:=20 c8abe497aeeb90c7d09da2e2a6ed65a9 1797 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.= 2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc 248269910f59870fe188f7c1cae380ab 5518867 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0= +1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz 1ce91266a31635f507a005a549da864c 9185 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.= 2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz a1586a014a75e63defef83f9facf1839 3255460 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0= +1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCGljUS+BYJZB4jhERAkiIAKC28JvP354yPys5PqIKwtx496UM6QCfeyCt QmDHPuQ+RZgj1jaXuPTh8Vg=3D =3DzvFz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.de= b gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.= gz --=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCG5/qvdkzt4X+wX8RAnTHAJ4uc8WaCO75h6aSoXRDr7qY86ECPACfa1ur DSrdw5oodLl3LV+uT+9O5T0= =dYEu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9-- From wouter-gnomemeeting@fort-knox.rave.org Tue Feb 22 19:29:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4523B0822 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:29:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25099-05 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:29:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from amsfep15-int.chello.nl (amsfep15-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.28]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05583B06D7 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:29:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from hibernate.cryolabs.net ([195.162.216.242]) by amsfep15-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with SMTP id <20050223002923.DUYE12698.amsfep15-int.chello.nl@hibernate.cryolabs.net> for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:29:23 +0100 Received: (qmail 20417 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 21:28:40 +0100 Received: from senta.theria.org (192.168.196.7) by hibernate.cryolabs.net with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 21:28:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:29:23 +0100 (CET) From: Wouter Van Hemel To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] In-Reply-To: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> Message-ID: References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:29:47 -0000 On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi everybody, > > for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 > tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting > 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) > Thanks! What does that STUN support through stun.voxgratia.org do exactly? From kk@verfaction.de Tue Feb 22 20:15:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0E83B0D8C for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27318-05 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293CE3B0D8B for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3l7z-0002XL-0Z for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:47 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3l7w-0007su-Sb for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:45 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:44 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1109121344.9615.5.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:15:51 -0000 --=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Wouter, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 01:29 +0100 schrieb Wouter Van Hemel: > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Kilian Krause wrote: >=20 > > Hi everybody, > > > > for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 > > tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting > > 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) > > >=20 > Thanks! What does that STUN support through stun.voxgratia.org do exactly= ? STUN is Simple Traversal of UDP over NAT. That will tell your internal workstation what external IP it shall send its UDP traffic as. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCG9lAvdkzt4X+wX8RAt2DAJ9FLTvNOXoSKTK6KSHK5vUSd13rDACdFMDf 7tAARBQnp2aK0SEirh5MlHk= =85tK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6-- From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Wed Feb 23 03:03:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7135F3B1991 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:03:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13568-07 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3263B077F for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from j3b79.j.pppool.de ([85.74.59.121] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3rUZ-0005rq-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:32 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3rUq-0002Fb-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:48 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502230903.45676.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:03:35 -0000 Kilian, thanks for providing the package. I am going to try it tomorrow. I just noticed that http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnomemeeting.html shows experimental packages 1.2.0. I guess these may be removed. Thanks, Rainer Am Dienstag, 22. Februar 2005 22:11 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi everybody, > > for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 > tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting > 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) > > -K.- > > -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- > Von: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > An: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org > Betreff: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source) > Datum: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:47:10 -0500 > Format: 1.7 > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:48:46 +0100 > Source: gnomemeeting > Binary: gnomemeeting > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > Description: > gnomemeeting - The GnomeMeeting Voice Over IP Suite > Closes: 272898 281215 282789 284437 284740 287234 > Changes: > gnomemeeting (1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1) unstable; urgency=low > . > * New upstream release. Building against Mimas pwlib/openh323 release. > + Release targeted to Sid. > + Don't show useless dialog. (Closes: #284740) > + GM is finished when GNOME session is closed. (Closes: #284437) > * debian/control: build-depend on current pwlib/openh323 versions > (Closes: #282789, #287234) > . > gnomemeeting (1.2.0-2) experimental; urgency=low > . > * Recompiled with new lipt-1.8.3 package. > . > gnomemeeting (1.2.0-1) experimental; urgency=low > . > * New upstream version. > + Fixes problems with Logitec Quickcam (Closes: #281215) > * Compiled using Atlas release of pwlib/openh323. > * Merging changes made in versions 1.0.2-6 and -7. > * Build-Depend on libhowl-dev, for enabling zeroconf support. > * debian/watch: updated. > * debian/patches: > + 05_configure: deleted. Not needed anymore. > + 10_relibtoolize: disabled. Upstream runs a up-to-date Sid system. > + 99_update_libtool_files: deleted. No longer needed. > . > gnomemeeting (1.1.3cvs20040929-1) experimental; urgency=low > . > * CVS Snapshot. Date: 09-30-2004 > + Preparation for 1.2 release > + Do not use gconf any longer for storing server list > (Closes: #272898) > * debian/control: > + Depends on new Pandora pwlib/openh323 release. > + Added Build-Dependency on evolution-data-server-dev > * debian/rules: > + Using $(confflags) properly. > * debian/patches: > + 05_configure: updated to reflect pwlib/openh323 versions we're > compiling with. > + 10_relibtoolize: disabled, as autogen.sh for this sources has been > run in a Debian environment. > Files: > c8abe497aeeb90c7d09da2e2a6ed65a9 1797 gnome optional > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc 248269910f59870fe188f7c1cae380ab > 5518867 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz > 1ce91266a31635f507a005a549da864c 9185 gnome optional > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz > a1586a014a75e63defef83f9facf1839 3255460 gnome optional > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb > > > > Accepted: > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz > to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc > to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb > to > pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz > to > pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 23 05:54:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF673B1A25 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:54:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23711-02 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:54:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582453B1A19 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:54:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3u9k-0005NR-PG for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:12 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3u9i-0002ej-Ai for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:10 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:10 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502230903.45676.rdorsch@web.de> References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> <200502230903.45676.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1109156050.5374.1.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:54:17 -0000 --=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > Kilian, >=20 > thanks for providing the package. I am going to try it tomorrow. >=20 > I just noticed that >=20 > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnomemeeting.html >=20 > shows experimental packages 1.2.0. I guess these may be removed. Yes. The experimental version is automatically superseded and thus removed from the archive when a newer version is in unstable. As you can see at http://ftp-master.debian.org/rene-daily.txt that's queued to the ftpmaster's manual removal. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHGDQvdkzt4X+wX8RAtSnAJ9gTx5gFMN5nxUPUqQhRBFzo77q0ACfQU3G tu6Uwx0RaP2dJ42TVvTOTQI= =XOkr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo-- From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 23 07:08:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47A73B181D for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:08:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28008-05 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:08:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFC23B18A0 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:08:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:39:12 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005022317391212369 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:39:12 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1109160511.3983.36.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:38:31 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2005 12:09:12.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[7CC3B6B0:01C519A0] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem launching GM 1.2.0 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:08:37 -0000 hi, I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. ============================================ Packages:- pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 glib-2.6.2 pango-1.8.0 atk-1.9.0 gtk+-2.6.2 evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 howl-0.9.7-1 gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz And the devel packages also. System:- FEDORA CORE 1 ============================================ Error:- [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): should not be reached aborting... And a dialog box appears which says:- <<<< "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". <<<< Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- <<<<<<<< [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND ................ root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 gnomemeeting root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet .......... <<<<<<<<<< ============================================ My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to the latest GTK version. Please help me in this context. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. From Peter.K.Martin@t-online.de Wed Feb 23 11:53:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EA73B1080 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12397-09 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89223B1084 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd35.aul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D3zlF-0001mq-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:53:17 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.76] (JJJpZgZ1reXYdqfDCu-VTGXCkN6nDceKuHiubR1HFnsYSNfwNBL7cf@[217.244.210.57]) by fwd35.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D3zlD-0Nwd3A0; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:53:15 +0100 From: "Peter K. Martin" To: Damien Sandras User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502141756.26385.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <200502142021.35795.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:53:05 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> X-ID: JJJpZgZ1reXYdqfDCu-VTGXCkN6nDceKuHiubR1HFnsYSNfwNBL7cf X-TOI-MSGID: 7c90e413-5720-492e-9354-c6cab3d1ea13 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Register as Gnomemeeting-User X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:53:21 -0000 --nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie: > Mmmh well, I can not cut and paste the manual here. Basically, you have > to go in preferences, Directory Settings, check that enable registering > is checked. Hi Damien, the first time I followed your advices, I got the content of ILS adressbook= =2E=20 But now I am not able to reach it a second time, although I enabled at=20 Directory Settings registering. One question - I beg your pardon - what is a NAT gateway and what is to be = =20 configured by me? Peter =2D-=20 --nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHLTxhlrz1G3ipzQRAuoXAKCP58vHQjyn63XX6gPYVEdbYQ15iwCfUmFj hg65sueO/KvRciKbwlsPS4E= =1TVD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg-- From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 23 15:57:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DC53B0F23 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25751-01 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201433B15B0 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (121.223-201-80.adsl.skynet.be [80.201.223.121]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420BE116EB; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:52 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Sandras To: "Peter K. Martin" In-Reply-To: <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> References: <200502141756.26385.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <200502142021.35795.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:57:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1109192272.3289.1.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Register as Gnomemeeting-User X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:57:55 -0000 Le mercredi 23 février 2005 à 17:53 +0100, Peter K. Martin a écrit : > Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie: > > Mmmh well, I can not cut and paste the manual here. Basically, you have > > to go in preferences, Directory Settings, check that enable registering > > is checked. > > Hi Damien, > the first time I followed your advices, I got the content of ILS adressbook. > But now I am not able to reach it a second time, although I enabled at > Directory Settings registering. > No idea about this one, if the IP address doesn't change, I don't understand why it doesn't register you, nobody ever reported that. Perhaps you are using special chars in the comment/location/email/firstname/lastname? > One question - I beg your pardon - what is a NAT gateway and what is to be > configured by me? A NAT gateway is when you have a computer or a router sharing your connection for several other computers. You have to configure it accordingly to the FAQ. > > Peter > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 23 16:02:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE04C3B1811 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:02:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26012-07 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:02:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B29A3B0C60 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:02:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D43el-0008Cp-Jm; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:52 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D43ej-0005xS-Ku; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:49 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:49 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109192272.3289.1.camel@golgoth01> References: <200502141756.26385.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <200502142021.35795.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1109192272.3289.1.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1109192569.28536.35.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Register as Gnomemeeting-User X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: "Peter K. Martin" X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:02:57 -0000 --=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 21:57 +0100 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Le mercredi 23 f=E9vrier 2005 =E0 17:53 +0100, Peter K. Martin a =E9crit = : > > Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie: > > > Mmmh well, I can not cut and paste the manual here. Basically, you ha= ve > > > to go in preferences, Directory Settings, check that enable registeri= ng > > > is checked. > >=20 > > Hi Damien, > > the first time I followed your advices, I got the content of ILS adress= book.=20 > > But now I am not able to reach it a second time, although I enabled at=20 > > Directory Settings registering. > >=20 >=20 > No idea about this one, if the IP address doesn't change, I don't > understand why it doesn't register you, nobody ever reported that. >=20 > Perhaps you are using special chars in the > comment/location/email/firstname/lastname? ...actually there's an almost ancient report about '+' not permitted for email addresses. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHO95vdkzt4X+wX8RAsLYAJ9rMiL/Y+ND9o4V0zCl7EUc7lQ5zgCcCDfr /tXSIBvnNrMzh0HACub2R2s= =aZPm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA-- From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Thu Feb 24 15:13:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7792A3B11EB for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:13:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32706-04 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:13:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BFD3B11F4 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:13:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0e54.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.84] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4PMe-0002E0-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:13:36 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4PMy-0003wf-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:13:56 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:13:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:13:41 -0000 Hi Kilian, I installed the new gnomemeeting version 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 from sid. I setup call forwarding rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar ding/forward_host 118.145.140.124 rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar ding/always_forward true rdorsch@paddy:~$ and a gateway is in use: rdorsch@paddy:~$ cat .gconf/apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/gateway/%gconf.xml 118.152.191.172 rdorsch@paddy:~$ Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more promising. It contains: 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may laptop (118.145.140.124). Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? Here is the full debug output of an incoming call: 2005/02/24 21:07:12.464 3:05:57.017 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:2064, if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Started incoming call thread 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Awaiting first PDU 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Receiving PDU: setup 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 RFC2833 Handler created 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Handling PDU: Setup callRef=155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/24 21:07:12.486 3:05:57.039 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 21:07:12.487 3:05:57.040 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.065 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 reason=EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 set to EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.067 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending release complete PDU: callRef=155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending PDU: releaseComplete 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Application not accepting calls 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 reason=EndedByTransportFail 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.070 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Signal channel stopped on first PDU. 2005/02/24 21:07:12.517 3:05:57.070 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 closing: connectionState=NoConnectionActive 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::Close 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:88270c0 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 terminated. 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.117 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 deleted. 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.118 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections Thanks, Rainer Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi Rainer, > > > Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem > > comes up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make > > sense for you? > > as long as IPv4 notation-compatibility notation in IPv6 is used, there > will be problems. Thus if your forwarding is to an ipv4 host, yes. > > > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > > > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). > > > > I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest > > version is 1.12.2 > > > > On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 > > > > What version I should watch out for? > > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > days to get the autobuilder script back online. -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 24 15:27:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED6B3B1C1D for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:27:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01006-06 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:27:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585F33B1C09 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:27:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (44-237.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.237.44]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FC21B66A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:32:50 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:27:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:27:46 -0000 Hi Rainer, Le jeudi 24 février 2005 à 21:13 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hi Kilian, > > I installed the new gnomemeeting version 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 from sid. > > I setup call forwarding > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar > ding/forward_host > 118.145.140.124 > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar > ding/always_forward > true > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > and a gateway is in use: > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > cat .gconf/apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/gateway/%gconf.xml > > > > > > 118.152.191.172 > > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > promising. It contains: > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party > name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it received > via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may laptop > (118.145.140.124). > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, including those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then disable the gateway setting when you forward calls. The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and calling h323:5001 is just the same. > Here is the full debug output of an incoming call: > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.464 3:05:57.017 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP > Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:2064, > if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Started incoming call thread > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Awaiting first PDU > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Receiving PDU: setup > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: H.261-QCIF <10> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: H.261-CIF <11> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/basicString <13> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: H.261-QCIF <10> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: H.261-CIF <11> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/basicString <13> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 RFC2833 > Handler created > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Handling PDU: Setup callRef=155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set > remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set > protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.486 3:05:57.039 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.487 3:05:57.040 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party > name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.065 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 > reason=EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Call > end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 set to EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.067 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending release complete PDU: callRef=155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending PDU: releaseComplete > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H323 Cleaner H323 > Cleaning up connections > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Application not accepting calls > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 > reason=EndedByTransportFail > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.070 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Signal > channel stopped on first PDU. > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.517 3:05:57.070 H323 Cleaner H323 > Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 closing: > connectionState=NoConnectionActive > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H323 > H323Transport::Close > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 > H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:88270c0 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 > Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 terminated. > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.117 H323 Cleaner H323 > Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 deleted. > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.118 H323 Cleaner H323 > Cleaning up connections > > Thanks, > Rainer > > Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > > Hi Rainer, > > > > > Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem > > > comes up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make > > > sense for you? > > > > as long as IPv4 notation-compatibility notation in IPv6 is used, there > > will be problems. Thus if your forwarding is to an ipv4 host, yes. > > > > > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > > > > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). > > > > > > I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest > > > version is 1.12.2 > > > > > > On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 > > > > > > What version I should watch out for? > > > > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need > > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > > days to get the autobuilder script back online. > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Thu Feb 24 16:31:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFC23B1C85 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:31:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05373-01 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:31:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7B53B1286 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:31:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0e54.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.84] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4QaQ-0002N6-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:31:54 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4Qak-0004ZV-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:32:14 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:32:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:31:56 -0000 Hi Damien, Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 21:27 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > > promising. It contains: > > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > > Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it > > received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may > > laptop (118.145.140.124). > > > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go > through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, including > those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then disable the > gateway setting when you forward calls. > > The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing > h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and > calling h323:5001 is just the same. > Ok, that sounds good. Switching forwarding off, does not work either. Maybe I did configure the forward host incorrectly: rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host 118.145.140.124 rdorsch@paddy:~$ What I get is 2005/02/24 22:21:19.299 4:20:03.852 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 22:21:19.300 4:20:03.853 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 22:21:19.308 4:20:03.861 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 reason=EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 set to EndedByNoAccept When I do 5001@118.145.140.124, I get 005/02/24 22:19:07.707 4:17:52.260 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/24 22:19:07.709 4:17:52.262 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 22:19:07.710 4:17:52.263 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 22:19:07.906 4:17:52.459 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 Party name "h323:5001@118.145.140.124" mapped to "5001@ip$118.145.140.124:1720 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2655/157 reason=EndedByNoAccept Nothing arrives at the debug output of the gnomemeeting running on the laptop. Do I need to setup a gatekeeper or can I forward directly to the gnomemeeting on the laptop? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 24 17:12:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830493B116A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:12:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07905-07 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:12:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040FB3B1BD4 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:12:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 44-237.244.81.adsl.skynet.be (44-237.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.237.44]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4091B66A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:17:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:12:29 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:12:32 -0000 Le jeu 24/02/2005 à 22:32, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hi Damien, > > Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 21:27 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > > > promising. It contains: > > > > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > > > Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > > > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > > > > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it > > > received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may > > > laptop (118.145.140.124). > > > > > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > > > > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go > > through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, including > > those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then disable the > > gateway setting when you forward calls. > > > > The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing > > h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and > > calling h323:5001 is just the same. > > > > Ok, that sounds good. Switching forwarding off, does not work either. Maybe I > did configure the forward host incorrectly: > I guess you mean switching "use gateway" off? > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > 118.145.140.124 > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > What I get is > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.299 4:20:03.852 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.300 4:20:03.853 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.308 4:20:03.861 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 reason=EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 Call > end reason for ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 set to EndedByNoAccept > I need the start of the debug output. > > When I do 5001@118.145.140.124, I get > > 005/02/24 22:19:07.707 4:17:52.260 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set > remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set > protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.709 4:17:52.262 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.710 4:17:52.263 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.906 4:17:52.459 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 Party > name "h323:5001@118.145.140.124" mapped to "5001@ip$118.145.140.124:1720 > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2655/157 > reason=EndedByNoAccept > > Nothing arrives at the debug output of the gnomemeeting running on the laptop. > > Do I need to setup a gatekeeper or can I forward directly to the gnomemeeting > on the laptop? > Why are you calling 5001? It was just an example. Is there something connected to 5001? Sorry but I'm a bit puzzled by your tests, what you are trying to achieve and what works and what doesn't. Things seem however simple. You have 2 cases. Imagine that you have machine A and B, and gateway C. If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B through C then you simply put B as forward host, C as gateway, and enable "use gateway", or you use no gateway and use h323:B@C as forward URL, you will do this on A. If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without using C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will do this on A. > Thanks, > Rainer -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Thu Feb 24 17:39:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDC53B12B3 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:39:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09523-08 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:39:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE073B1AE6 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0e54.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.84] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4RdM-0002Uy-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:39:00 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4Rdg-00052U-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:39:20 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:39:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> In-Reply-To: <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:39:04 -0000 Hi Damien, sorry for puzzling you ;-) Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 23:12 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Le jeu 24/02/2005 =E0 22:32, Rainer Dorsch a =E9crit : > > Hi Damien, > > > > Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 21:27 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > > > > promising. It contains: > > > > > > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > > > > Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > > > > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > > > > > > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it > > > > received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead = of > > > > may laptop (118.145.140.124). > > > > > > > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > > > > > > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go > > > through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, > > > including those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then > > > disable the gateway setting when you forward calls. > > > > > > The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing > > > h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and > > > calling h323:5001 is just the same. > > > > Ok, that sounds good. Switching forwarding off, does not work either. > > Maybe I did configure the forward host incorrectly: > > I guess you mean switching "use gateway" off? Correct. > > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > > 118.145.140.124 > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > > > What I get is > > > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.299 4:20:03.852 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > > Sending call proceeding PDU > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.300 4:20:03.853 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > > Sending PDU: callProceeding > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.308 4:20:03.861 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > > Sending PDU: facility > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 > > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2675/159 > > reason=3DEndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H2= 25 > > Answer:8886c48 H323 Call end reason for > > ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2675/159 set to EndedByNoAccept > > I need the start of the debug output. Appended. > > > When I do 5001@118.145.140.124, I get > > > > 005/02/24 22:19:07.707 4:17:52.260 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=3DIdle > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=3DIdle > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 = =20 > > Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 = =20 > > Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.709 4:17:52.262 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > > Sending call proceeding PDU > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.710 4:17:52.263 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > > Sending PDU: callProceeding > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.906 4:17:52.459 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 = =20 > > Party name "h323:5001@118.145.140.124" mapped to > > "5001@ip$118.145.140.124:1720 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 = =20 > > H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending PDU: facility > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 > > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2655/157 > > reason=3DEndedByNoAccept > > > > Nothing arrives at the debug output of the gnomemeeting running on the > > laptop. > > > > Do I need to setup a gatekeeper or can I forward directly to the > > gnomemeeting on the laptop? > > Why are you calling 5001? It was just an example. Is there something > connected to 5001? That was just to understand if gnomemeeting needs an forward target of the= =20 form xxx@yyy. I expected that 5001 was an example, but I would have hoped=20 that I get an rejection from the A (your nomenclature below) > > Sorry but I'm a bit puzzled by your tests, what you are trying to > achieve and what works and what doesn't. I am a VOIP beginner...so not all things I try might make sense. > > Things seem however simple. > > You have 2 cases. Imagine that you have machine A and B, and gateway C. > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B through C > then you simply put B as forward host, C as gateway, and enable "use > gateway", or you use no gateway and use h323:B@C as forward URL, you > will do this on A. That is not what I want to do. > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without using > C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will do > this on A. > That is what I want to achieve. The log (I am surprised that there is no indication at all about the=20 forward_host 118.145.140.124): 2005/02/24 23:27:35.760 5:26:20.313 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP=20 Started connection: host=3D::ffff:118.152.191.172:3201,=20 if=3D118.152.251.114:1720, handle=3D45 2005/02/24 23:27:35.761 5:26:20.314 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Started incoming call thread 2005/02/24 23:27:35.761 5:26:20.314 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Awaiting first PDU 2005/02/24 23:27:35.767 5:26:20.320 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Receiving PDU: setup 2005/02/24 23:27:35.767 5:26:20.320 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=3D164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.767 5:26:20.320 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.768 5:26:20.321 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.768 5:26:20.322 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.769 5:26:20.322 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.769 5:26:20.322 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.769 5:26:20.323 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.770 5:26:20.323 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.771 5:26:20.324 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.771 5:26:20.324 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.772 5:26:20.325 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.772 5:26:20.325 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.772 5:26:20.325 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.773 5:26:20.326 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.773 5:26:20.326 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.773 5:26:20.327 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.774 5:26:20.327 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.775 5:26:20.328 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.776 5:26:20.329 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.777 5:26:20.330 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.777 5:26:20.330 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.777 5:26:20.331 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.778 5:26:20.331 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.778 5:26:20.331 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.779 5:26:20.332 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.780 5:26:20.333 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.780 5:26:20.334 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.781 5:26:20.334 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.781 5:26:20.334 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.782 5:26:20.335 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.782 5:26:20.335 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 RFC2833=20 Handler created 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 =20 Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Handling PDU: Setup callRef=3D164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.784 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 =20 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 =20 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set= =20 remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set= =20 protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/24 23:27:35.786 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 23:27:35.788 5:26:20.341 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 23:27:35.798 5:26:20.351 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 23:27:35.799 5:26:20.352 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 =20 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164=20 reason=3DEndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Cal= l=20 end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 set to EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending release complete PDU: callRef=3D164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.802 5:26:20.355 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending PDU: releaseComplete 2005/02/24 23:27:35.803 5:26:20.356 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Cleaning up connections 2005/02/24 23:27:35.805 5:26:20.358 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 closing:=20 connectionState=3DNoConnectionActive 2005/02/24 23:27:35.806 5:26:20.359 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Application not accepting calls 2005/02/24 23:27:35.806 5:26:20.359 H323 Cleaner H245 =20 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.807 5:26:20.360 H323 Cleaner H245 =20 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.808 5:26:20.361 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 H323Transport::Close 2005/02/24 23:27:35.808 5:26:20.362 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 =20 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164=20 reason=3DEndedByTransportFail 2005/02/24 23:27:35.809 5:26:20.362 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:88f15a8 2005/02/24 23:27:35.810 5:26:20.363 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Sig= nal=20 channel stopped on first PDU. 2005/02/24 23:27:35.820 5:26:20.373 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 terminated. 2005/02/24 23:27:35.868 5:26:20.421 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 deleted. 2005/02/24 23:27:35.868 5:26:20.421 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Cleaning up connections Thanks, Rainer =2D-=20 Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 04:27:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCB23B0B64 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:27:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09793-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:27:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967083B1D6D for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:27:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336311B2B5 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:32:45 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:27:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:27:36 -0000 hi :) > > > > Sorry but I'm a bit puzzled by your tests, what you are trying to > > achieve and what works and what doesn't. > > I am a VOIP beginner...so not all things I try might make sense. > No worries, the setup is not complex. But I'm lost in the explanations. > > > > Things seem however simple. > > > > You have 2 cases. Imagine that you have machine A and B, and gateway C. > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B through C > > then you simply put B as forward host, C as gateway, and enable "use > > gateway", or you use no gateway and use h323:B@C as forward URL, you > > will do this on A. > > That is not what I want to do. > > > > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without using > > C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will do > > this on A. > > > > That is what I want to achieve. > OK, in that case, what you have to do is : - do not use a gateway - put the IP of the destination of the call forward in the call forwarding box (h323:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) - enable call forwarding > The log (I am surprised that there is no indication at all about the > forward_host 118.145.140.124): > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.760 5:26:20.313 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP > Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:3201, > if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 118.152.251.114 is the local address of the GM that is forwarding the call it just received. > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Handling PDU: Setup callRef=164 > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.784 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set > remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set > protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.786 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.788 5:26:20.341 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.798 5:26:20.351 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.799 5:26:20.352 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > reason=EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Call > end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 set to EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 The call is not forwarded, it is rejected. Can you watch what happens in the "General History"? What happens in the GUI when you activate call forwarding, isn't there an error message? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Fri Feb 25 06:50:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EA73B07B1; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:50:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16959-03; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:50:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5E23B1227; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:50:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D4dyy-00066S-8N; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:08 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D4dyu-0008PM-AF; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:04 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:04 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs" Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting development mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:50:21 -0000 --=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everybody, guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the commonly known ones:=20 http://snapshots.seconix.com/ (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/=20 (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. Please use: "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next week. For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's *NO* guarantee with these debs. Enjoy testing. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHxDsvdkzt4X+wX8RAk9EAJwMeALqrgEOVOQcjFDtGx+nvBtRKQCfRLk4 ACSWlVZwMUqBVjCiiO5WFUc= =Ix73 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs-- From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 07:02:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0091B3B0968; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:02:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17634-10; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ED33B07B1; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06446147A2; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:08:02 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting development mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:02:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1109332966.3418.34.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:02:49 -0000 Hi :) Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 12:50 +0100, Kilian Krause a écrit : > Hi everybody, > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > commonly known ones: > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > Please use: > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > Thanks for this! Good job! > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > week. > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > Don't complain either if they uninstall Skype ;) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 07:57:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9104F3B0A08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:57:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20560-06 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C585D3B0817 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:57:50 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 2663 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 12:57:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 12:57:49 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:57:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:57:49 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:57:56 -0000 Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not finished recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the way anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? any comments ?? have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... cheers Selon Kilian Krause : > Hi everybody, > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > commonly known ones: > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > Please use: > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > week. > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > Enjoy testing. > > -- > Best regards, > Kilian > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 08:01:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35473B140E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20836-07 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5B03B1233 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE0511BC4 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:05:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:00:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1109336441.3418.38.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:01:06 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 13:57 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not finished > recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone > cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the way > anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? any > comments ?? > I think it should work, I have no sipphone.com account though. If not, we will fix it ;) > have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... > > cheers > > > Selon Kilian Krause : > > > Hi everybody, > > > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > > commonly known ones: > > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > > Please use: > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > > week. > > > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > > > Enjoy testing. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Kilian > > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 08:05:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C403B1DE1 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:05:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21561-08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:05:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ACB3B1E82 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:02:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008D4C93E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:07:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:02:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:05:25 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 13:57 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not finished > recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone > cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the way > anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? any > comments ?? > Just thinking to that, do they support some "open" codecs or only G.723.1 and G.729a? > have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... > > cheers > > > Selon Kilian Krause : > > > Hi everybody, > > > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > > commonly known ones: > > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > > Please use: > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > > week. > > > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > > > Enjoy testing. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Kilian > > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 08:42:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C89B3B13F8 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23455-02 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B593B13FC for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 3141 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 13:42:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 13:42:24 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:42:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:42:23 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:42:26 -0000 you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP devices against vonage.... A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really ....beta ..... if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) cheers Selon Damien Sandras : > Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 13:57 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > > Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not > finished > > recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone > > cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the > way > > anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? > any > > comments ?? > > > > Just thinking to that, do they support some "open" codecs or only > G.723.1 and G.729a? > > > have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... > > > > cheers > > > > > > Selon Kilian Krause : > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > > > commonly known ones: > > > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > > > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > > > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > > > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > > > > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > > > Please use: > > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > > > > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > > > week. > > > > > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > > > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > > > > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > > > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > > > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > > > > > Enjoy testing. > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Kilian > > > > > > > > -- > _ Damien Sandras > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 08:56:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DC23B13F8 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:56:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24172-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:55:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B673B1E3E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:55:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE48CAC05 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:01:12 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:55:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:56:00 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 14:42 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or > maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited > free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN > .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are > the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP > devices against vonage.... > > A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > > BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really > ....beta ..... I only know kphone, linphone, phonegaim and ... GnomeMeeting. > > if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) > Not sure if FWD-out supports that. > cheers -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From brrhtz@yahoo.de Fri Feb 25 10:28:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56B93B1105 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:28:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29336-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:28:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.33]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22FE23B1082 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:28:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 15:28:54 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:28:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1109345337.6073.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:28:59 -0000 On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 14:55 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > I only know kphone, linphone, phonegaim and ... GnomeMeeting. There's also SJPhone for linux, but it has it's flaws too: * no dial pad (i.e. not dtmf during calls) * some latency, depending on your soundcard (driver) Apart from that, in terms of audio quality etc. it's the best linux sip phone I've encountered so far, and besides GM the only softphone I'd currently recommend. Regards, Bruno. PS: You can run asterisk as a softphone too (chan_oss resp. chan_alsa), latency is very small, audio quality medium but functionality pretty limited. Also, the mentioned chans don't release the sound device between calls, which too limits their usefulness. From lurch@gmx.li Fri Feb 25 10:43:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B7F3B07E0 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30062-05 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0791F3B0010 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0ICH00LH14ZWJN@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:43:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:43:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1PFh7Vj008832 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:43:07 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 12492 invoked from network); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:43:07 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:43:07 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:42:57 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) In-reply-to: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:43:12 -0000 --nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 14:42 schrieb michel memeteau: > you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have > G711 or maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it= s > unlimited free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup > to call PSTN .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open > IPBX as they are the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and > they proned opening SIP devices against vonage.... > > A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > > BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really > ....beta ..... There are good reasons to use G.711: Low complexity - modern, high efficient codecs use a lot of computing power= ,=20 so if you want to do a lots of channels, you have to trade bandwith for low= =20 complexity. Especially Speex needs a lot of cpu power ... High quality - if you are providing a PSTN gateway, you want to have the be= st=20 possible narrowband codec - and G.711 is your choice then. Even the best=20 modern codecs will give a (unnoticeable) worse quality. =46ax transparency - G.711 is the only codec you can transfer Fax over=20 transparently. Low latency - if you dont care about bandwith, G.711 gives you the lowest=20 latency Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCH0eHb39KPYz+qlMRAoD9AKCcvKS7VMWYZ7q7pJtQFfuSGc7dZACghjhW dAZikhiyzHELl9z3jhA4Rrg= =3+pN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav-- From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 10:54:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29823B1099 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:53:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30899-09 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:53:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F3F3B0F41 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:53:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 5074 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 15:53:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 15:53:23 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:53:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1109346803.421f49f31b3bc@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:53:23 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> In-Reply-To: <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:54:01 -0000 Thanks for those precisions , I understand why a SIP registrar would use G711 , I did not now that we could use Fax over G711 but I understand it because it s a lassless codec ( not sure about that ) .. I gave a try to Sjphone , but it s a bit limited I guess .... Can you phone a PSTN with it ?? Another question : is this ISAC codec free as ILBC , did skype change the default codec .... I thought they were using only ILBC at first ..... Quoting Stefan Bruens : > > There are good reasons to use G.711: > Low complexity - modern, high efficient codecs use a lot of computing power, > > so if you want to do a lots of channels, you have to trade bandwith for low > complexity. Especially Speex needs a lot of cpu power ... > High quality - if you are providing a PSTN gateway, you want to have the best > > possible narrowband codec - and G.711 is your choice then. Even the best > modern codecs will give a (unnoticeable) worse quality. > Fax transparency - G.711 is the only codec you can transfer Fax over > transparently. > Low latency - if you dont care about bandwith, G.711 gives you the lowest > latency > > Greetings, > > Stefan > > -- > Stefan Brüns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen > mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ > phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 10:59:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB273B0703 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31315-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C643B141C for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:31 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 5189 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 15:59:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 15:59:30 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:59:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1109347170.421f4b622ec44@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:59:30 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> <1109346803.421f49f31b3bc@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> In-Reply-To: <1109346803.421f49f31b3bc@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:59:35 -0000 OK here s what they say .... dont mention whether it s free ( as in beer ) or not GIPS iSAC GIPS iSAC - a wideband, adaptive codec, designed to deliver high quality sound in both high-bit-rate and low-bit-rate conditions. GIPS iSAC makes VoIP communications possible even using a dial-up modem, automatically adjusting transmission rates to deliver better-than-PSTN voice quality. Quoting michel memeteau : > Thanks for those precisions , I understand why a SIP registrar would use G711 > , > I did not now that we could use Fax over G711 but I understand it because it > s > a lassless codec ( not sure about that ) .. I gave a try to Sjphone , but it > s > a bit limited I guess .... Can you phone a PSTN with it ?? > > Another question : is this ISAC codec free as ILBC , did skype change the > default codec .... I thought they were using only ILBC at first ..... > > Quoting Stefan Bruens : > > > > There are good reasons to use G.711: > > Low complexity - modern, high efficient codecs use a lot of computing > power, > > > > so if you want to do a lots of channels, you have to trade bandwith for low > > > complexity. Especially Speex needs a lot of cpu power ... > > High quality - if you are providing a PSTN gateway, you want to have the > best > > > > possible narrowband codec - and G.711 is your choice then. Even the best > > modern codecs will give a (unnoticeable) worse quality. > > Fax transparency - G.711 is the only codec you can transfer Fax over > > transparently. > > Low latency - if you dont care about bandwith, G.711 gives you the lowest > > latency > > > > Greetings, > > > > Stefan > > > > -- > > Stefan Brüns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen > > mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ > > phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 > > > > > -- > Michel memeteau > 0624808051 > jabber : freechelmi > www.marseille-wireless.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From devel@tootai.net Fri Feb 25 11:00:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340843B1253 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:00:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31381-10 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:00:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mango.tootai.net (mango.tootai.net [217.11.129.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9FC3B1457 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.10.4] (cbk163.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.30.108.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by mango.tootai.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id j1PFxtqI006798 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:59:55 +0100 Message-ID: <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:06:04 +0100 From: daniel huhardeaux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> In-Reply-To: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:00:26 -0000 michel memeteau a écrit : >you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or >maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited >free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN >.... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are >the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP >devices against vonage.... > >A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > >BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really >....beta ..... > > Hmmh, I find it more and more stable. If you don't want to use the linux version, run the windows one with wine, works great, specially with KDE. You also have SjPhone: simple but working. >if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) > > FWD is only g711. Try sipgate or sipphone -- Daniel Huhardeaux ______ _____ _____ ______ ______ __ enum +48 32 285 5276 /_ _// _ // _ //_ _// __ // / IAX FWD +1 7009 422493 / / / // // // / / / / /_/ // / sip:101 h323:121 @voip./_/ /____//____/ /_/ /_/ /_//_/.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Fri Feb 25 15:31:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280AB3B0888 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14084-10 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609123B0834 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0364.j.pppool.de ([85.74.3.100] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4m7m-0005GK-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:31:46 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4m88-0008KE-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:32:08 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:32:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502252132.07907.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:31:53 -0000 Hi Damien, > > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without > > > using C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will > > > do this on A. > > > > That is what I want to achieve. > > OK, in that case, what you have to do is : > - do not use a gateway I did not use the gateway. > - put the IP of the destination of the call forward in the call > forwarding box (h323:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) I missed the h323: so far. Added it now, but still does not work. > - enable call forwarding > > > The log (I am surprised that there is no indication at all about the > > forward_host 118.145.140.124): > > > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.760 5:26:20.313 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP > > Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:3201, > > if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 > > 118.152.251.114 is the local address of the GM that is forwarding the > call it just received. Correct, it should forward it to 118.145.140.124 > > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > > Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Handling PDU: Setup callRef=164 > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.784 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.786 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Sending call proceeding PDU > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.788 5:26:20.341 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Sending PDU: callProceeding > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.798 5:26:20.351 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Sending PDU: facility > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.799 5:26:20.352 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > > reason=EndedByNoAccept > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > > Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 set to > > EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 > > Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > The call is not forwarded, it is rejected. Can you watch what happens in > the "General History"? Is that dumped into a file? I am enabling the forwarding with gconftool-2 via a shell console. > > What happens in the GUI when you activate call forwarding, isn't there > an error message? I did not watch the GUI while enabling since I did that from remote. I did not see a popup error box, when I returned to the workstation, running the gnomemeeting forwarding the call. When starting up gnomemeeting 1.2.1 I sometimes see [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 This is with forwarding disabled and happens only sometimes. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From carlosh@linuxservices.co.nz Fri Feb 25 17:40:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1D53B0C42 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19795-08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from linda-1.paradise.net.nz (bm-1a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A1A3B0BED for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (smtp-2a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.195]) by linda-1.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0ICH0082ROBZN7@linda-1.paradise.net.nz> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:40:47 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.0.18] (203-96-159-89.paradise.net.nz [203.96.159.89]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ACA9E2B6 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:40:47 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:39:27 +1300 From: Carlos Hernandez Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) In-reply-to: <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <421FA91F.90008@linuxservices.co.nz> Organization: LINUX Services Ltd. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:40:53 -0000 Hello all: I am new to this list. I had a nice surprise to know yesterday, of the new features for gm, SIP! I've been trying installing all those soft phones mentioned on Linux (except the ones with wine) and really there's nothing I've liked. Is there anything I could help with to speed up the testing? iLBC is the codec of my preference since it works great on slow connections. Cheers, Carlos == daniel huhardeaux wrote: > michel memeteau a écrit : > >> you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only >> have G711 or >> maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s >> unlimited >> free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to >> call PSTN >> .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as >> they are >> the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned >> opening SIP >> devices against vonage.... >> >> A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... >> >> BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is >> really >> ....beta ..... >> >> > Hmmh, I find it more and more stable. If you don't want to use the > linux version, run the windows one with wine, works great, specially > with KDE. You also have SjPhone: simple but working. > >> if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) >> > FWD is only g711. Try sipgate or sipphone > From ian.firla@gmail.com Sat Feb 26 04:08:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079E53B099B for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:08:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10135-06 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:08:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8226A3B0A37 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:08:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so533001wri for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:08:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AFRN1+nVTkgXsajvyCJjOV0InxX47YoU4obU9YXh6FmIW35xu5qWMJ/WX2NGaXgRIN233J/FFyfay0LF++fcR/BnRIFbtxu4WD6ODLy3rIxqs3MSm60brtJsWIp1MXdX6jFbzcxsvsQhjNQkA8GqqeXCCQLKkdDIRff6HtS3C5A= Received: by 10.54.47.62 with SMTP id u62mr45074wru; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:08:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.14.25 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:08:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:08:17 +0100 From: Ian Firla To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ian Firla , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:08:45 -0000 Hello All, I've read through the archives on this error as well as on the make of my webcam and I haven't yet seen a solution for the problem that works for me so I'm trying again. OS: Ubuntu Debian/GNU Linux (tracking hoary aka unstable) Kernel: 2.6.10-4-amd64-generic Webcam: Logitech QuickCam Pro 3000 USB webcam Gnomemeeting version: 1.2.0 (used the Ubuntu deb package) Like others who have posted to the list, I have no problems using the webcam with other applications. Its built-in microphone works with Gnomemeeting. I get the famous "Error while opening video device /dev/video0" message when running gnomemeeting as a regular user and as root. I've noted that when starting up gnomeeting from the commandline, I see the following error message: kubla@ogmios:~ $ gnomemeeting & [1] 15104 kubla@ogmios:~ $ [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 The device has correct ownership and my user is a member of the video group: crw-rw---- 1 root video 81, 0 2005-02-26 09:33 /dev/video0 The relevant output from my syslog looks like this: Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 4 Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost kernel: Linux video capture interface: v1.00 Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost kernel: pwc Philips webcam module version 10.0.6-unofficial loaded. Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14040]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules' at line 49 applied, 'controlC2' becomes 'snd/%k' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14040]: creating device node '/dev/snd/controlC2'Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost usb.agent[13762]: snd-usb-audio: loaded successfully Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14144]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules' at line 51 applied, 'pcmC2D0c' becomes 'snd/%k' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14144]: creating device node '/dev/snd/pcmC2D0c' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14143]: creating device node '/dev/video0' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14128]: creating device node '/dev/dsp2' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14130]: creating device node '/dev/audio2' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14132]: creating device node '/dev/mixer2' Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Supports Philips PCA645/646, PCVC675/680/690, PCVC720[40]/730/740/750 & PCVC830/840. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Also supports the Askey VC010, various Logitech Quickcams, Samsung MPC-C10 and MPC-C30, Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc the Creative WebCam 5 & Pro Ex, SOTEC Afina Eye and Visionite VCS-UC300 and VCS-UM100. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Trace options: 0x00a1 Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Logitech QuickCam Pro 3000 USB webcam detected. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Registered as /dev/video0. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: usbcore: registered new driver Philips webcam Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: usbcore: registered new driver snd-usb-audio Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc Failed to set LED on/off time. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc set_video_mode(176x144 @ 10, palette 15). Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc decode_size = 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc Using alternate setting 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc set_video_mode(160x120 @ 10, palette 15). Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc decode_size = 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc Using alternate setting 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc set_video_mode(160x120 @ 10, palette 15). Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc decode_size = 1. Any ideas or suggestions? Many thanks in advance, Ian From lurch@gmx.li Sat Feb 26 06:49:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80A23B09BB for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:49:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16738-04 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:48:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352013B0982 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:48:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0ICI00A2VOTMTA@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1QBmvos008973 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:57 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 32296 invoked from network); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:48:57 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:48:57 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:54 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 In-reply-to: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> To: Ian Firla , GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:49:03 -0000 --nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Samstag, 26. Februar 2005 10:08 schrieb Ian Firla: Try opening it with small size and with large size (Preferences->Video=20 Devices) Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCIGInb39KPYz+qlMRAuiLAKCnNun70HN4mw8HR7SEP3bYRQFoGACfSzon eBaLhloft+P8ph8rfCWyzcs= =Rb6n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh-- From ian.firla@gmail.com Sat Feb 26 07:22:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A943B0982 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:22:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18166-01 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:22:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0800D3B0747 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:22:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so544174wri for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=FzzPePdGfZSQvPgTg9MUgfyVg9/T5kR8hKg3qNQhob9KIEFtnQ+XQa4hlsabGwappH9v7SPJeVn+vpI8taXz7u4E+M0tBSGEXYfL3PU40UmoRLP7LU8OcVDcb0yGk7/B076ElZCQ0Fbxxk7OMY2tjomEswp1IcGcFop31WUD/W8= Received: by 10.54.43.77 with SMTP id q77mr13664wrq; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.14.25 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:22:54 +0100 From: Ian Firla To: lurch@gmx.li Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 In-Reply-To: <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ian Firla , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:22:57 -0000 I tried that already. I also tried changing formats from ntsc to pal to secam, etc. Thanks anyway! Ian On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:54 +0100, Stefan Bruens wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Februar 2005 10:08 schrieb Ian Firla: >=20 > Try opening it with small size and with large size (Preferences->Video > Devices) >=20 > Greetings, >=20 > Stefan >=20 > -- > Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen > mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ > phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 >=20 >=20 > From asharma@samyak.com Sat Feb 26 08:49:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B428D3B08DE for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22724-04 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABED03B0979 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:20:33 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005022619203220998 ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:20:32 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:19:37 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2005 13:50:33.0187 (UTC) FILETIME=[24296330:01C51C0A] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: OpenH323 Mailing List Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:49:46 -0000 hello All, I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. ============================================ Packages:- pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 glib-2.6.2 pango-1.8.0 atk-1.9.0 gtk+-2.6.2 evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 howl-0.9.7-1 gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz And the devel packages also. System:- FEDORA CORE 1 ============================================ Error:- [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): should not be reached aborting... And a dialog box appears which says:- <<<< "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". <<<< Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- <<<<<<<< [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND ................ root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 gnomemeeting root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet .......... <<<<<<<<<< ============================================ My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to the latest GTK version. Please help me in this context. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. From conrad_b@yahoo.com Sat Feb 26 20:12:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B733B06D5 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:12:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18504-01 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:12:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from web41508.mail.yahoo.com (web41508.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.91]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7090E3B0670 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:12:39 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 53282 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Feb 2005 01:12:38 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=ntYcgrVkYBIKEM0yE7Pj9RTGnWsqG5jvc5rZ0+pULjOHX1SQE8wRayNNdHM6uEeEnGud6H1+mlAwccE04nq5JrKlNk70LNXLgTIJWLKRfe8rEUjldSBn5lH/MeSsdWcUA1dCdIqXIyFfgOurrumI/ulO5e6J6LFby5xj5tFdc7Y= ; Message-ID: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.227.18.13] by web41508.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:12:38 CET Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:12:38 +0100 (CET) From: Conrad Beckert To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:12:41 -0000 Hi, sorry for asking a question that might have been asked before. I run SUSE 9.1 and thuse have automake 1.8.2 installed. The autogen.sh script complains: checking for autoconf >= 2.53... testing autoconf2.50... not found. testing autoconf... found 2.59 checking for automake >= 1.7... testing automake-1.7... not found. ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 installed to build gnomemeeting. Download the appropriate package for from your distribution or get the source tarball at http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/automake/automake-1.7.tar.gz checking for libtool >= 1.4.3... testing libtoolize... found 1.5.2 checking for glib-gettext >= 2.2.0... testing glib-gettextize... found 2.2.3 checking for intltool >= 0.25... testing intltoolize... found 0.30 checking for pkg-config >= 0.14.0... testing pkg-config... found 0.15.0 ./autogen.sh: line 1: --print-ac-dir: command not found Checking for required M4 macros... libtool.m4 not found glib-gettext.m4 not found intltool.m4 not found pkg.m4 not found Checking for forbidden M4 macros... ***Error***: some autoconf macros required to build gnomemeeting were not found in your aclocal path, or some forbidden macros were found. Perhaps you need to adjust your ACLOCAL_PATH? automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.8.3 Written by Tom Tromey . What's wrong? Conrad ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de From jan.schampera@web.de Sat Feb 26 20:24:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915ED3B076C for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18839-07 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546113B0670 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd11.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5DAj-0006qv-01; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:37 +0100 Received: from router.home.thebonsai.de (SrjQV-ZE8e0c-Wl6W0YaDEN4nMvADK20Xciuu+u15IpTX0lTwsMysY@[217.224.196.243]) by fmrl11.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D5DAh-1vLE000; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 Received: from mainserver.home.thebonsai.de (mainserver.home.thebonsai.de [192.168.64.3]) by router.home.thebonsai.de (8.12.6/TheBonsai) with SMTP id j1R1Oa1N011520 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:36 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 From: Jan Schampera To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS Message-ID: <20050227022435.5d21e94f@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> In-Reply-To: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: SrjQV-ZE8e0c-Wl6W0YaDEN4nMvADK20Xciuu+u15IpTX0lTwsMysY@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: af9b578d-4205-4925-9c14-2acf2e7a4f70 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:24:40 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:12:38 +0100 (CET) Conrad Beckert wrote: > checking for automake >= 1.7... > testing automake-1.7... not found. > ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 installed Which is your autoconf version? J. -- "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." - J. B. Postel, master of the net. From jan.schampera@web.de Sat Feb 26 21:00:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6A93B070A for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:00:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19986-07 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:00:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.83]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62A93B06D5 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:00:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5DjJ-0004Cj-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:21 +0100 Received: from router.home.thebonsai.de (GvancQZBoeE3MVipGQ-TbeUFndADWNsNfVKg5jy+oxzYu5+LelrS8f@[217.224.196.243]) by fmrl09.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D5Dj8-0go83M0; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:10 +0100 Received: from mainserver.home.thebonsai.de (mainserver.home.thebonsai.de [192.168.64.3]) by router.home.thebonsai.de (8.12.6/TheBonsai) with SMTP id j1R20B1N012120 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:09 +0100 From: Jan Schampera To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS Message-ID: <20050227030009.7f750279@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> In-Reply-To: <20050227022435.5d21e94f@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> References: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> <20050227022435.5d21e94f@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> Organization: private X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: GvancQZBoeE3MVipGQ-TbeUFndADWNsNfVKg5jy+oxzYu5+LelrS8f@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: b843488e-7b19-4fe5-8248-b35a4be83148 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:00:23 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 Jan Schampera wrote: > > checking for automake >= 1.7... > > testing automake-1.7... not found. > > ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 installed > Which is your autoconf version? Automake of course :) J. -- "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." - J. B. Postel, master of the net. From conrad_b@yahoo.com Sun Feb 27 06:28:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBB63B091B for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:28:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10913-06 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:28:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from web41507.mail.yahoo.com (web41507.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.90]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C52C3B07BE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:28:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 66407 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Feb 2005 11:28:41 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=UZBLT2+2hzLhNnNPnAbPEQUb+q9nYVVLxYeHMshr0L7YJnI7H60dvhyNHpn1uDrwRGn/1/5MuQaLceRjukKqSKYgCYWcMS2+kCm3ShHTFAVHeGZET5UIEPzmScDflrMJdkPbuCcf/ebU3N8jtQUdjPLmchcyoZEUX4CAVbDRU/A= ; Message-ID: <20050227112841.66405.qmail@web41507.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.227.18.13] by web41507.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:41 CET Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:41 +0100 (CET) From: Conrad Beckert Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050227030009.7f750279@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:28:45 -0000 --- Jan Schampera schrieb: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 > Jan Schampera wrote: > > > > > checking for automake >= 1.7... > > > testing automake-1.7... not found. > > > ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 > installed > > Which is your autoconf version? > Automake of course :) > automake 1.8.3 - the one that comes with SuSE 9.1 autoconf 2.59 - dito Conrad ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de From jan.schampera@web.de Sun Feb 27 11:22:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17D53B0669 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:22:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25090-02 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:22:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA603B066D for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:22:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5RBL-0000bu-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:11 +0100 Received: from router.home.thebonsai.de (S+6eoaZOYemMXSS8M1j0f8RdjQdRucJuzTGgnkvoRcxcOIaQ8+pMEk@[217.95.206.205]) by fmrl09.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D5RBI-1xMtLk0; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:08 +0100 Received: from mainserver.home.thebonsai.de (mainserver.home.thebonsai.de [192.168.64.3]) by router.home.thebonsai.de (8.12.6/TheBonsai) with SMTP id j1RGM81N032111 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:08 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:07 +0100 From: Jan Schampera To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS Message-ID: <20050227172207.452b4df7@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> In-Reply-To: <20050227112841.66405.qmail@web41507.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050227030009.7f750279@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> <20050227112841.66405.qmail@web41507.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: S+6eoaZOYemMXSS8M1j0f8RdjQdRucJuzTGgnkvoRcxcOIaQ8+pMEk@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: 80cb79a5-7cc9-4a8b-9102-2ddd8a8104b2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:22:18 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:41 +0100 (CET) Conrad Beckert wrote: > > Automake of course :) > automake 1.8.3 - the one that comes with SuSE 9.1 > autoconf 2.59 - dito I had a simelar problem. Automake 1.6 and Automake 1.9 installed. The ./autogen.sh told me the same. I tracked it down to my Automake M4-Makro that tests that: it only knew up to 1.7. So I changed autogen.sh to look for minimum AM 1.6. Then it found my 1.6.3 package. Maybe you could do simelar. Again, the problem are the auto*.m4 macros. J. -- "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." - J. B. Postel, master of the net. From jonny.strom@netikka.fi Mon Feb 28 03:15:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93E63B08D7 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04573-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:15:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.linuxvaasa.com (av8.netikka.fi [213.250.83.8]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3453B081A for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:15:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [213.250.83.8] (mail.linuxvaasa.com [213.250.83.8]) by mail.linuxvaasa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF3F111362 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:15:33 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4222D325.7010204@netikka.fi> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:15:33 +0200 From: Johnny Strom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; sv-SE; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:15:37 -0000 Damien Sandras wrote: > Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 14:42 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > >>you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or >>maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited >>free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN >>.... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are >>the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP >>devices against vonage.... >> >>A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... >> >>BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really >>....beta ..... > > > I only know kphone, linphone, phonegaim and ... GnomeMeeting. > There is mythphone as well but you need mythtv it is not intended for standard desktop use. > >>if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) >> > > > Not sure if FWD-out supports that. > > >>cheers > > From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:27:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6033B09BF for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:27:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09250-06 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:27:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C203B095E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:27:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8F418F7E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:33:08 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <421FA91F.90008@linuxservices.co.nz> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> <421FA91F.90008@linuxservices.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:27:22 +0100 Message-Id: <1109582842.3614.18.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:27:26 -0000 Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 11:39 +1300, Carlos Hernandez a écrit : > Hello all: > I am new to this list. I had a nice surprise to know yesterday, of the > new features for gm, SIP! > I've been trying installing all those soft phones mentioned on Linux > (except the ones with wine) and really there's nothing I've liked. > Is there anything I could help with to speed up the testing? > > iLBC is the codec of my preference since it works great on slow > connections. > In a few days we will have binaries available again, for easy installation. I will announce it here, and announce what works and what's broken. In all cases it will be parallel installable with GnomeMeeting 1.2, so that you can use both. > Cheers, > Carlos > > == > > daniel huhardeaux wrote: > > > michel memeteau a écrit : > > > >> you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only > >> have G711 or > >> maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s > >> unlimited > >> free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to > >> call PSTN > >> .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as > >> they are > >> the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned > >> opening SIP > >> devices against vonage.... > >> > >> A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > >> > >> BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is > >> really > >> ....beta ..... > >> > >> > > Hmmh, I find it more and more stable. If you don't want to use the > > linux version, run the windows one with wine, works great, specially > > with KDE. You also have SjPhone: simple but working. > > > >> if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) > >> > > FWD is only g711. Try sipgate or sipphone > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:29:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5F63B09B5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:29:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09488-05 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:29:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F98C3B07F5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:29:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108A61B67D; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:35:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , Ian Firla In-Reply-To: <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:29:37 +0100 Message-Id: <1109582977.3614.20.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: lurch@gmx.li X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:29:50 -0000 Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 13:22 +0100, Ian Firla a écrit : > I tried that already. > > I also tried changing formats from ntsc to pal to secam, etc. > > Thanks anyway! I have not tried GnomeMeeting yet with a recent kernel, but I know there was a bug in the driver. Can you try loading pwcx ? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:31:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09793B09B5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:31:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09688-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:31:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2393B09C6 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:31:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933B018F7E; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:37:00 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> References: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:31:15 +0100 Message-Id: <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: OpenH323 Mailing List X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:31:22 -0000 Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 19:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > hello All, > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > ============================================ > Packages:- > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > glib-2.6.2 > pango-1.8.0 > atk-1.9.0 > gtk+-2.6.2 > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > howl-0.9.7-1 > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > And the devel packages also. > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > ============================================ > Error:- > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > That can be safely ignored. > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): > should not be reached > aborting... > You need to upgrade liborbit/bonobo-activation-server. I wonder why it is not a dependancy. > And a dialog box appears which says:- > <<<< > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". > <<<< > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > <<<<<<<< > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > ................ > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > gnomemeeting > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > .......... > <<<<<<<<<< > ============================================ > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > the latest GTK version. > > Please help me in this context. > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:34:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5849D3B0A0E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:34:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09859-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0090A3B09ED for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:34:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D4B1B670 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:39:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502252132.07907.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> <200502252132.07907.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:34:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1109583242.3614.25.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:34:11 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 21:32 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > > Is that dumped into a file? I am enabling the forwarding with gconftool-2 via > a shell console. > Unfortunately not... Can't you do a ssh -X to export the display and see in real time what's happening? My guess is that the call forwarding is not activated for some obscure reason. (It could even be a bug). > > > > What happens in the GUI when you activate call forwarding, isn't there > > an error message? > > I did not watch the GUI while enabling since I did that from remote. I did not > see a popup error box, when I returned to the workstation, running the > gnomemeeting forwarding the call. > > When starting up gnomemeeting 1.2.1 I sometimes see > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > This is with forwarding disabled and happens only sometimes. > That's a warning from libhowl, it can be safely ignored. The ideal is to check the general history, I will try call forwarding again tonight at home to make sure it is not broken. Perhaps another GM 1.2 user can try too and report back? > Thanks, > Rainer > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 28 04:58:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA403B0881 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:58:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11140-03 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5121A3B087F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:58:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:29:34 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005022815293330238 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:29:34 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> References: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1109584728.3980.48.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:28:48 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2005 09:59:34.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[34C568B0:01C51D7C] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:58:51 -0000 Hi , Well thanks for the help. But I was able to make that Socket problem resolved by starting the mDNSResponder. But regarding the second one as you suggested about the liborbit and libbonobo, I had installed these prior to installing GM1.2.0 =20 Sorry I forgot to mention about all the packages. THese packages were:- ORBit2-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 ORBit2-devel-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 libbonobo-2.4.3 libbonoboui-2.4.3 Thanks and regards, Ashutosh On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 15:01, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le samedi 26 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 19:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a =C3= =A9crit : > > hello All, > >=20 > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Packages:-=20 > > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > > glib-2.6.2 > > pango-1.8.0 > > atk-1.9.0 > > gtk+-2.6.2 > > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > > howl-0.9.7-1 > >=20 > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > >=20 > > And the devel packages also. > >=20 > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Error:- > >=20 > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > >=20 >=20 > That can be safely ignored. >=20 >=20 >=20 > >=20 > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv):=20 > > should not be reached > > aborting... > >=20 >=20 > You need to upgrade liborbit/bonobo-activation-server. I wonder why it > is not a dependancy. >=20 >=20 > > And a dialog box appears which says:- > > <<<< > > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)".=20 > > <<<< > >=20 > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > > <<<<<<<< > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > >=20 > > ................ > > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > > gnomemeeting > > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00=20 > > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > > .......... > > <<<<<<<<<< > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >=20 > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > > the latest GTK version. > > =20 > > Please help me in this context. > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > > Ashutosh Sharma. > >=20 > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 05:06:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A173B08D6 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11701-05 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:06:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76B33B09FB for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:05:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E73BDF9 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:11:44 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109584728.3980.48.camel@sipl25> References: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> <1109584728.3980.48.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:05:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1109585159.3614.55.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:06:46 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 15:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi , > > Well thanks for the help. But I was able to make that Socket problem > resolved by starting the mDNSResponder. > Indeed, that is what I consider as a bug in the library. It should silently fail. > But regarding the second one as you suggested about the liborbit and > libbonobo, I had installed these prior to installing GM1.2.0 > > Sorry I forgot to mention about all the packages. > THese packages were:- > > ORBit2-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 > ORBit2-devel-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 > libbonobo-2.4.3 > libbonoboui-2.4.3 > I will let Johnny comment on this, he is our fedora guy :) > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh > > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 15:01, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 19:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > hello All, > > > > > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > > > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > > > ============================================ > > > Packages:- > > > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > > > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > > > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > > > glib-2.6.2 > > > pango-1.8.0 > > > atk-1.9.0 > > > gtk+-2.6.2 > > > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > > > howl-0.9.7-1 > > > > > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > > > > > And the devel packages also. > > > > > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > > > ============================================ > > > Error:- > > > > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > > > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > > > > > > That can be safely ignored. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > > > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): > > > should not be reached > > > aborting... > > > > > > > You need to upgrade liborbit/bonobo-activation-server. I wonder why it > > is not a dependancy. > > > > > > > And a dialog box appears which says:- > > > <<<< > > > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > > > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". > > > <<<< > > > > > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > > > <<<<<<<< > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > > > > > ................ > > > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > > > gnomemeeting > > > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 > > > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > > > .......... > > > <<<<<<<<<< > > > ============================================ > > > > > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > > > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > > > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > > > the latest GTK version. > > > > > > Please help me in this context. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From james.ellis@gmail.com Mon Feb 28 05:37:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BB23B0980 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:37:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13319-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:37:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01953B07F5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:37:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so210627rne for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ujp9KXbUrwTT3Lu9eKYc0ih5hh1smDhn+44/HrMD612wELFwQ0CxAVi49zWQCtZS1jSm1HDJPcZM1v2FfGJs1aWXEG9saDgchBGJ+BEwOxzTjtLElMLYAkOVCQV4+oNADx38X77l3hAUjeRHpXj75BkSI58NgMAcAneHHe9A1ns= Received: by 10.38.12.21 with SMTP id 21mr101126rnl; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.86.19 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:37:17 +0000 From: James Ellis To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] gm and dlink router with NAT X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: James Ellis , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:37:19 -0000 Hi This is my first post here.... I'm trying to set up gnomemeeting (1.02) on my FC3 box, this has gone ok and the program has picked up my Cam - a PWC 840 - and Microphone ok. I believe the firewall on my dlink router (724) is cauing some problems.. does anyone have any knowledge of how to transpose the port information available in the gm website FAQ to the dlink configuration (I've tried and failed) ? Dlink suggest that the box be placed in the "DMZ" - outside the firewall but I don't think that is a suitable answer. Thanks and cheers James From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 05:43:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CD53B09FA for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:43:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13607-08 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:43:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735793B0A2F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:43:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D242116EB; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:48:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] gm and dlink router with NAT From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , James Ellis In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:43:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1109587387.3614.67.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:43:14 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 10:37 +0000, James Ellis a écrit : > Hi > > This is my first post here.... > > I'm trying to set up gnomemeeting (1.02) on my FC3 box, this has gone > ok and the program has picked up my Cam - a PWC 840 - and Microphone > ok. > I believe the firewall on my dlink router (724) is cauing some > problems.. does anyone have any knowledge of how to transpose the port > information available in the gm website FAQ to the dlink configuration > (I've tried and failed) ? > > Dlink suggest that the box be placed in the "DMZ" - outside the > firewall but I don't think that is a suitable answer. The easiest is to use GM 1.2. I think (but I'm not sure) that DLink routers are not of the type "Symmetric NAT". In short words, that means that you do not have to forward any port as long as you are using STUN support in GnomeMeeting. It makes things easier. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 07:29:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687133B0730 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:29:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19977-03 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BACB3B08AE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9644AB40; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:35:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Fwd: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1] From: Damien Sandras To: Ashutosh Sharma In-Reply-To: <1109592911.3980.170.camel@sipl25> References: <1109585374.3614.59.camel@golgoth01> <4222F49E.6030700@netikka.fi> <1109592911.3980.170.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:29:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1109593788.8626.2.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Johnny Strom , gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:29:51 -0000 Hi, Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 17:45 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi, > Well thanks. > And I am sorry. I think the problem was from my side only. Actually I > forgot to remove the builtin GM 0.98.5 version. Now when I uninstalled > it then I again did make && make install and it works fine. Thanks once > again for the help and I am sorry. No problem :) > Anyway the new GM is really very nice. I saw and then I found that in > the Audio Codec List there is no option for G.723.1 because in the > earlier versions it used to be there. Yes, it automagically appears now when available, but it is only available when using Quicknet cards (no driver yet for the 2.6 kernel though) > And I want to know why there are two different Audio Plugins > (OSS/Quicknet). If I have Quicknet h/w and then I select OSS then is > this fine ?? or will it hamper the overall performance. > If you have Quicknet hardware and select OSS (or ALSA), then it will use OSS (or ALSA) but not Quicknet hardware, it means that G.723.1 won't be available, and it also means that you will use your soundcard instead of a real POTS or headset plugged into the Quicknet card. > Also I want to know is there any PTZ Camera and WebCam which may have > the compatibility with the OpenH323 and GM. Because I don't know but you > people might have used it while doing conferencing. I don't know what a PTZ camera is, but any camera compatible with video4Linux and supported by the Linux kernel will work with GnomeMeeting. I usually recommend Philips cameras (ToUCam PRO). > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh. > > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 16:08, Johnny Strom wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > Here I have the following versions of Orbit and Bonobo on fedora core 2 > > and it works fine here: > > > > > > Bonobo: > > bonobo-1.0.22-8.1 > > gnome-python2-bonobo-2.0.0-4.1 > > libbonobo-devel-2.6.2-1 > > libbonoboui-2.6.0-1 > > bonobo-devel-1.0.22-8.1 > > libbonobo-2.6.2-1 > > libbonoboui-devel-2.6.0-1 > > > > > > Orbit: > > ORBit-0.5.17-11.4.1 > > ORBit2-devel-2.10.0-4 > > ORBit2-2.10.0-4 > > ORBit-devel-0.5.17-11.4.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Damien Sandras wrote: > > > -------- Message transféré -------- > > > De: Ashutosh Sharma > > > Répondre à : GnomeMeeting mailing list > > > ä: GnomeMeeting mailing list > > > Cc: OpenH323 Mailing List > > > Objet: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 > > > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:19:37 +0530 > > > hello All, > > > > > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > > > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > > > ============================================ > > > Packages:- > > > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > > > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > > > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > > > glib-2.6.2 > > > pango-1.8.0 > > > atk-1.9.0 > > > gtk+-2.6.2 > > > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > > > howl-0.9.7-1 > > > > > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > > > > > And the devel packages also. > > > > > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > > > ============================================ > > > Error:- > > > > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > > > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > > > > > > > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > > > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): > > > should not be reached > > > aborting... > > > > > > And a dialog box appears which says:- > > > <<<< > > > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > > > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". > > > <<<< > > > > > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > > > <<<<<<<< > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > > > > > ................ > > > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > > > gnomemeeting > > > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 > > > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > > > .......... > > > <<<<<<<<<< > > > ============================================ > > > > > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > > > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > > > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > > > the latest GTK version. > > > > > > Please help me in this context. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk Mon Feb 28 07:42:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317AF3B099B for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:42:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20570-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:42:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx01.stofanet.dk (mx01.stofanet.dk [212.10.10.11]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0A73B0744 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:42:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from 3e6b2209.rev.stofanet.dk ([62.107.34.9]) by mx01.stofanet.dk (envelope-from ) with esmtp id 1D5kED-0002Eb-1r for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:42:26 +0100 From: Duncan Lithgow To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:42:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502281342.31520.duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Can't contact LDAP server. X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:42:29 -0000 Okay, freshly installed on FC3 but no joy yet. a. on firing it up from the command line i get: --- Cannot contact the user directory Failed to bind to user directory: Can't contact LDAP server. --- b. how do i get it to appear on the applications menu? Ideas for fixing these? Thanks, Duncan -- Linux user #372812: more stable and cheaper than windows GnuPG Public Key ID: 0x2BB9667C21A8C63A: protecting your security From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 07:45:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C1F3B099B for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:45:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20794-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:45:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F7A3B08F4 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:45:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C421B442; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:51:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Can't contact LDAP server. From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk In-Reply-To: <200502281342.31520.duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk> References: <200502281342.31520.duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:45:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1109594739.8626.13.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:45:42 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 13:42 +0100, Duncan Lithgow a écrit : > Okay, freshly installed on FC3 but no joy yet. > > a. on firing it up from the command line i get: > --- > Cannot contact the user directory > Failed to bind to user directory: Can't contact LDAP server. > --- > When do you get that? When trying to refresh the LDAP server or the ILS server? The LDAP server is for future extension, it is not supported yet. The ILS server should work. > b. how do i get it to appear on the applications menu? > It should be available in the GNOME menus after installation. If not, it is a bug in the packages you have used to install GnomeMeeting. Actually you should have : /usr/share/applications/gnomemeeting.desktop And once you have that, it should appear in the menu in the "Internet" category. Perhaps your distribution is using another path, for example, SuSE is using /opt/usr instead of /usr/ iirc. > Ideas for fixing these? Thanks, Duncan > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From macciardi@arnet.com.ar Thu Feb 17 21:55:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DDB3B0718 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:55:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25040-06 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:55:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp6.arnet.com.ar (smtp6.arnet.com.ar [200.45.191.24]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D4033B067F for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:55:13 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 29683 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2005 02:54:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?201.252.17.5?) (201.252.17.5) by smtp6.arnet.com.ar with SMTP; 18 Feb 2005 02:54:14 -0000 Message-ID: <42152318.3020002@arnet.com.ar> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:04:56 +0100 From: Mariano Acciardi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:10 -0500 Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Interface language X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:55:17 -0000 Hi all, I wan't to ask some question. I'just installed gnomemeeting Version GnomeMeeting 1.0.2 on KDE and the language of the screen interface I think is german. Can I change language to English? I didn't found the place in menu to to this. Are they some files to modify? Thank you Best Regards Mariano From Philippe.Combes@ens-lyon.fr Sat Feb 26 19:15:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4BD3B0890 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:15:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16784-01 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:15:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B193B08C1 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:15:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from [82.253.121.230] (lns-vlq-37-lyo-82-253-121-230.adsl.proxad.net [82.253.121.230]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEE12BEEA9 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:15:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <42211244.8080106@ens-lyon.fr> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:20:20 +0100 From: Philippe Combes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr-ch, fr-be, fr-lu, fr-mc, en-gb, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:32 -0500 Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] ALSA not detected X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:15:17 -0000 Hi all, I am not a subscriber to the list, so please let me in CC... I have compiled GM 1.2 on my system (Debian sid - 2.4.27) and installed it, as well as its dependencies (PWLib, openH323) in /usr/local. I have compiled, installed and loaded the alsa modules for my kernel, and I can listen to audio files with my sound card (so it seems my ALSA modules work ! - the old OSS driver for my card has not been built in my kernel, and so is not involved) But the DRUID does not detect ALSA and only propose Quicknet choice as regards the audio plugin. I guess it is a problem of ALSA installation, but what ? What does the druid look for to detect ALSA ? Thanks in advance for any help. Philippe From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 08:09:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434173B0744 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:09:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22781-08 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:09:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97EF3B0730 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:09:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98C31B46F; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:15:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Interface language From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42152318.3020002@arnet.com.ar> References: <42152318.3020002@arnet.com.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:09:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1109596175.8626.18.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Mariano Acciardi X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:09:37 -0000 Hello, Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 00:04 +0100, Mariano Acciardi a écrit : > Hi all, > > I wan't to ask some question. I'just installed gnomemeeting Version > GnomeMeeting 1.0.2 on KDE and the language of the screen interface I > think is german. Can I change language to English? I didn't found the > place in menu to to this. Are they some files to modify? > It is a setting of your distribution. There is no configuration in GnomeMeeting for this, but there is certainly a tool in your distribution to change it. If you can not change it, just run GnomeMeeting from a terminal this way : LC_ALL=C gnomemeeting It will be in english. > Thank you > Best Regards > Mariano > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 08:11:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895523B0876 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22966-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7BC3B0800 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A859412BEF; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:17:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] ALSA not detected From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42211244.8080106@ens-lyon.fr> References: <42211244.8080106@ens-lyon.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:11:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1109596309.8626.22.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Philippe Combes X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:11:51 -0000 Hi, Le dimanche 27 février 2005 à 01:20 +0100, Philippe Combes a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am not a subscriber to the list, so please let me in CC... > There is so much SPAM that you have been lucky that I have seen your email in the mass of spams. > I have compiled GM 1.2 on my system (Debian sid - 2.4.27) and installed > it, as well as its dependencies (PWLib, openH323) in /usr/local. > I have compiled, installed and loaded the alsa modules for my kernel, > and I can listen to audio files with my sound card (so it seems my ALSA > modules work ! - the old OSS driver for my card has not been built in my > kernel, and so is not involved) > > But the DRUID does not detect ALSA and only propose Quicknet choice as > regards the audio plugin. > I guess it is a problem of ALSA installation, but what ? > What does the druid look for to detect ALSA ? > the alsa plugin has probably not been compiled because you don't have libasound-dev, or it has not been installed in /usr/lib/pwlib/ or /usr/local/lib/pwlib/ But why don't you use standard debian packages to get 1.2? damien@golgoth01:~$ apt-cache policy gnomemeeting gnomemeeting: Installés : (aucun) Candidat : 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-2 Table de version : 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-2 0 500 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/main Packages damien@golgoth01:~$ It even contains the 1.2.1 patches! > Thanks in advance for any help. > > Philippe > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 08:54:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348C43B06CA for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:54:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25590-05 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:54:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5D03B0A47 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:53:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0CAC457; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:59:38 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 From: Damien Sandras To: Ian Firla In-Reply-To: <11e9231d050228054064ee3c77@mail.gmail.com> References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> <1109582977.3614.20.camel@golgoth01> <11e9231d050228054064ee3c77@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:53:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1109598832.8626.34.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:54:49 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 14:40 +0100, Ian Firla a écrit : > I only appear to have the pwc module compiled. > > Where can I grab the sources for pwcx? > Here: http://www.saillard.org/linux/pwc/ > Ian > > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:29:37 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 13:22 +0100, Ian Firla a écrit : > > > I tried that already. > > > > > > I also tried changing formats from ntsc to pal to secam, etc. > > > > > > Thanks anyway! > > > > I have not tried GnomeMeeting yet with a recent kernel, but I know there > > was a bug in the driver. Can you try loading pwcx ? > > > > -- > > _ Damien Sandras > > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > > v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From Peter.K.Martin@t-online.de Mon Feb 28 12:37:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2973B0D45 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:37:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08527-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:37:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578053B0D87 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:36:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd30.aul.t-online.de by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5ooZ-00033i-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:36:15 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.76] (XGZ7o+Zv8e6bsUXNzlYTDQHJsa8slukTFxVhdLgd4qjejM+ZP11SrY@[217.244.215.129]) by fwd30.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D5ooU-05wTXE0; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:36:10 +0100 From: "Peter K. Martin" To: GnomeMeeting Mailing Liste Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:35:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502281836.06676.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> X-ID: XGZ7o+Zv8e6bsUXNzlYTDQHJsa8slukTFxVhdLgd4qjejM+ZP11SrY X-TOI-MSGID: 9ccc09b6-5f29-4a6b-9639-7bd2237471f7 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] GnomeMeeting 1.2 and SuSE 9.2 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:37:36 -0000 --nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, today I tried to install GnomeMeeting 1.2. I got the download RPMs for SuSE= =20 9.1 and so I think there are little incompatibilities as I get error messag= es=20 from YaST like missing liblber.so.199 libldap_r.so.199 libldap.so.199 the OpenLDAP-client 2 is installed via YaST. So I don't know what to do at = the=20 moment. Perhaps there is someone who kindly compile a version of RPMs for=20 SuSE 9.2? You get with the SuSE 9.2 Distrib. only the version 1.0 of GnomeMeeting and= I=20 think there are a lot of improvements in version 1.2. Kind regards Peter =2D-=20 --nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCI1aGhlrz1G3ipzQRApyCAJwLdfqh5kn8CcU28fde/EmHC2iD5gCfdBDh YsyLVBeo+TYPfBszufjP3R4= =+Hkv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK-- From asharma@samyak.com Tue Feb 1 07:39:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50723B0A6D for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11872-07 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA1E3B119C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:09:07 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020118085702698 ; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:08:57 +0530 Message-ID: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:08:20 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2005 12:39:07.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[05482EF0:01C5085B] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Bhaskar Trivedi , GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Which Audio/Video Codec source codes are available freely X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 12:39:18 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, I want to know whether the source codes for all Audio & Video codecs = available under Linux for H.323 based communication. G.711, G.722, G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729 H.261, H.263 From the voxgratia FAQ I got to know that G.728 and G.729 are not = freely available. Please help. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello All,
 
   I want to know whether the = source=20 codes for all Audio & Video codecs available under = Linux=20 for H.323 based communication.
 
  G.711, G.722,=20 G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729
  H.261, H.263
 
 From the voxgratia FAQ I got to = know that=20 G.728 and G.729 are not freely available.
 
Please help.
 
Thanks and regards,
Ashutosh = Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0-- From craigs@postincrement.com Tue Feb 1 15:18:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CD83B12AF for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08921-02 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344053B141C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.13] (rapido.southeren.com [10.0.2.13]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j11KHnxB016004; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:17:50 +1100 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:17:52 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: "asharma" , , "Bhaskar Trivedi" , "GnomeMeeting mailing list" In-Reply-To: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> Message-Id: <20050202071435.837F.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [OpenH323]Which Audio/Video Codec source codes are available freely X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:18:13 -0000 On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:08:20 +0530 "asharma" wrote: > Hello All, > > I want to know whether the source codes for all Audio & Video codecs available under Linux for H.323 based communication. > > G.711, G.722, G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729 > H.261, H.263 > > From the voxgratia FAQ I got to know that G.728 and G.729 are not freely available. The Vox Gratia FAQ does not mention G.728. But here is a general overview of the state of each of these codecs: G.711 - available in OpenH323 G.722 - available in OpenH323 G.723 - now G.726. Available in OpenH323 G.723.1 - patented G.728 = patented G.729 = patented H.261 - available in OpenH323 H.263 - Patent status uncertain. Available in OpenH323. Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 2 09:50:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1343B14D5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:50:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22369-10 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:49:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273EA3B09EE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:49:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:20:23 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020220202204198 ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:20:23 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: openh323@openh323.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:19:53 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2005 14:50:23.0703 (UTC) FILETIME=[865CA670:01C50936] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:50:01 -0000 Hi all, I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I tried "make both" then I got the following error:- //////////// g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constr uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, from main.cxx:94: /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or directory /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or directory main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, PConfigPage*)': main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 ////////// In main.cxx the line no 570 is as follows:- SetCapability(0, 0, new H323_GSM0610Capability); Now when I tried to comment out that and again did the same task then I got the following erroneous trace:- ///////// g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constr uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, from main.cxx:94: /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or directory /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or directory make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 //////// Please help. Thanks and Regards, A. Sharma From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 2 09:52:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CDE3B1559 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22688-06 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2053B154C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D9312A62 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:53:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:52:19 +0100 Message-Id: <1107355939.3317.81.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:52:23 -0000 Hi, Sorry but a compilation error regarding opengk is off-topic for the GnomeMeeting mailing list. Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 20:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. > > First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I > tried "make both" then I got the following error:- > > //////////// > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl > ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os > -felide-constr > uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > from main.cxx:94: > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, > PConfigPage*)': > main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > > ////////// > > In main.cxx the line no 570 is as follows:- > > SetCapability(0, 0, new H323_GSM0610Capability); > > Now when I tried to comment out that and again did the same task then I > got the following erroneous trace:- > > ///////// > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constr uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > from main.cxx:94: > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > //////// > > Please help. > Thanks and Regards, > A. Sharma > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 10:26:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F5D3B158A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:26:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24607-09 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:26:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08943B1587 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:26:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwMOo-0001vl-1p for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:26:34 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwMOm-0008WF-6M for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:26:32 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:26:32 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:26:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1107357991.5083.6.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:26:38 -0000 --=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ashutosh, > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 looks like a broken or incomplete Qt installation to me.. Just my 2 Ct. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAPEnvdkzt4X+wX8RAhdqAJ9ciGnCH48TbwH995/u/nm3aPmR9gCeI/w7 13vfB1AjRx0GjPkXfFUW8+U= =OQYh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 11:52:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5433B0C18 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30333-05 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.33]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA3F63B096C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 16:52:44 -0000 From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:52:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:52:48 -0000 Hi guys I'm trying to build GM Opal and grabbed basically all involved packages from http://snapshots.seconix.com/cvs/ i.e. gnomemeeting-opal, opal, openh323 and pwlib. Unfortunately, I have trouble building pwlib, the make run seems to build only parts and the install fails halfway through. My configure is pretty simple: ./configure --prefix=/opt/opal --enable-plugins Do I need to set extra options? Or actually another pwlib version, since GM seems to require 1.8.3 while that tgz identifies itself as 1.8.4 ? Thanks, Bruno. From lurch@gmx.li Wed Feb 2 12:25:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62523B0812 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00659-06 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A613B0ABF for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IBA00CXSOEF3S@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j12HPQGL011055 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:26 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 12275 invoked from network); Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:25:25 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:25:25 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:18 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk In-reply-to: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502021825.24416.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:25:30 -0000 --nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 15:49 schrieb Ashutosh Sharma: > Hi all, > > I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. > > First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I > tried "make both" then I got the following error:- > > //////////// > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl > ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os > -felide-constr > uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > from main.cxx:94: > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, > PConfigPage*)': > main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 I think you did something really stupid - make could not find gsmcodec.h, s= o=20 you copied it from somewhere on your disk? The gsmcodec.h which you have in /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/ is from= =20 qtopia! Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=C3=BCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAQ0Eb39KPYz+qlMRAuYUAKCGHQWQcQ3lZKx5pZOt3B8cUBXhEQCgk3A1 +jaOhOeJVHbI4QChCNummrs= =Sr+n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB-- From kk_konrad@gmx.at Wed Feb 2 12:55:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDB63B0B5A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:55:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02503-04 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:55:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EB913B0689 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:55:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Feb 2005 17:55:31 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 02 Feb 2005 18:55:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:55:23 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Message-ID: <20050202175523.GA16172localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:55:35 -0000 Hi, I am running against a wall with netmeeting 3.01 on XP + meetspeex <-> gnomemeeting-1.2.0 on Fedora FC3: I am unable to get both sides to use at least one of the low bandwidth speex codecs (i already played a lot around with meetspeex rearranging/enabling/disabling codecs). gnomemeeting happily transmits to netmeeting using speexw 8kHz (audio gets actually through), but netmeeting transmit either uses the uncompressed G711 codecs (too much bandwidth), MS-GSM if I enable it (bad audio quality) or nothing if I am allowing only speex at gmomemeeting. (speexw and all others tried) Is there anybody who has solved the puzzle or is it unsolvable? I am interested in audio only at the moment but this can change easily :-) Regards, Konrad PS: I second the question about the gnomemeeting on windows status question. Is there anything to start with? What are the major problems expected? PPS: anybody tried getting a DV camcorder (ieee1394) to work with gnomemeeting? From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 13:55:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C7D3B0B94 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:55:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06103-01 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:55:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8953B07A7 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:55:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwPey-0004vC-VB for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:55:29 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwPew-00024B-Dn for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:55:26 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:55:26 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:55:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:55:34 -0000 --=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruno, > I'm trying to build GM Opal and grabbed basically all involved packages > from http://snapshots.seconix.com/cvs/ > i.e. gnomemeeting-opal, opal, openh323 and pwlib. >=20 > Unfortunately, I have trouble building pwlib, the make run seems to > build only parts and the install fails halfway through. what errormsg are you encountering and what arch trying to build on? Amd64 is known to need CFLAGS=3D"-fPIC -DPIC" to compile ok (but the errormsg would tell you that anyway). --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCASIevdkzt4X+wX8RAkN0AJ4xtNVZao0hW5ukkC5FCT5oToapnQCdGmZQ FnFvYgvBMgbuhYWI4SppFSM= =CgrQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 14:22:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99D73B0C8A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:22:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07442-09 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:22:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02F453B0CE2 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:22:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 19:22:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:22:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:22:05 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 19:55 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > what errormsg are you encountering and what arch trying to build on? > Amd64 is known to need CFLAGS="-fPIC -DPIC" to compile ok (but the > errormsg would tell you that anyway). > Fedora Core 3 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 #1 Thu Nov 18 15:10:10 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux FYI: I build other pwlib versions (like Janus for asterisk) on the same machine without problems. Seems the plugins configure goes wrong the whole way. No sound support detected although e.g. OSS support and sys/soundcard.h are available: configure: configuring in plugins configure: running /bin/sh './configure' --prefix=/opt/opal '--prefix=/opt/opal' '--enable-plugins' --cache-file=/dev/null --srcdir=. checking for g++... g++ checking for C++ compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes Plugin source directory is /home/bruno/dl/voip/opal/pwlib/plugins checking sys/soundcard.h usability... no checking sys/soundcard.h presence... no checking for sys/soundcard.h... no checking for OSS sound support... no checking machine/ioctl_meteor.h usability... no checking machine/ioctl_meteor.h presence... no checking for machine/ioctl_meteor.h... no checking i386/ioctl_meteor.h usability... no checking i386/ioctl_meteor.h presence... no checking for i386/ioctl_meteor.h... no checking dev/ic/bt8xx.h usability... no checking dev/ic/bt8xx.h presence... no checking for dev/ic/bt8xx.h... no checking for BSD video support... no checking libavc1394/avc1394.h usability... no checking libavc1394/avc1394.h presence... no checking for libavc1394/avc1394.h... no checking libdv/dv.h usability... no checking libdv/dv.h presence... no checking for libdv/dv.h... no checking libraw1394/raw1394.h usability... no checking libraw1394/raw1394.h presence... no checking for libraw1394/raw1394.h... no checking for IEEE1394/AVC video support... no configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating vidinput_dc/Makefile Make then goes OK, but make install gives ( for dir in /opt/opal/lib \ /opt/opal/include/ptlib \ /opt/opal/include/ptlib/unix/ptlib \ /opt/opal/include/ptclib \ /opt/opal/share/pwlib/make ; \ do mkdir -p $dir ; chmod 755 $dir ; \ done ) /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 /opt/opal/lib (cd /opt/opal/lib ; \ rm -f libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8 ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8 \ ) (cd /opt/opal/lib ; \ rm -f libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1 ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1 \ ) (cd /opt/opal/lib ; \ rm -f libpt_linux_x86_r.so ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 libpt_linux_x86_r.so \ ) (cd /opt/opal/lib; \ rm -f libpt.so ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so libpt.so \ ) cd plugins/pwlib/device/ ; \ ( for dir in ./* ;\ do mkdir -p /opt/opal/lib/pwlib/devices/$dir ; \ chmod 755 /opt/opal/lib/pwlib/devices/$dir ; \ (for fn in ./$dir/*.so ; \ do /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $fn /opt/opal/lib/pwlib/devices/$dir; \ done ); \ done ) /bin/sh: line 0: cd: plugins/pwlib/device/: No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././a.out/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ChangeLog/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ChangeLog.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.guess/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.log/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.status/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.sub/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././configure/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././configure.ac/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././configure.exe/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././CVS/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././History.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././include/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././install-sh/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././make/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././Makefile/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././Makefile.in/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././mpl-1.0.htm/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././msvc6_upgrade.bat/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././plugins/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlibce.vcp/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlibce.vcw/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib_cfg.dxy/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.dsw/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.dxx/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.dxy/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.mak/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.sln/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.vcp/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.wpj/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.wsp/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ReadMe_QOS.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ReadMe.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././README_VXWORKS.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././samples/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././src/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././tools/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././version.h/*.so': Not a directory make: *** [install] Error 1 Regards, Bruno. From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 14:28:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBBF3B1589 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:28:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07905-05 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:28:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937DE3B15C8 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:27:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwQ9t-0005VR-Kz for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:25 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwQ9r-0002LJ-Pb for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:23 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:27:23 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:28:34 -0000 --=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruno, > /bin/sh: line 0: cd: plugins/pwlib/device/: No such file or directory yes, that's a bug i also encountered. Craig so far has no "fix" for this. Will keep you posted once this is resolved. Until then try to compile without plugins. ;) --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBCASmbvdkzt4X+wX8RAitZAJ4lS4QTtLZogYRyjBieKIWhR4mFlQCUD9ZP +/IP+88C0ubHh1ypp8tWUw== =kUDY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 14:51:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6C73B0955 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:51:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09576-09 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:51:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.36]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 547EB3B0E50 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:51:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 19:51:47 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:51:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1107373910.3826.34.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:51:50 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:27 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > yes, that's a bug i also encountered. Craig so far has no "fix" for > this. Will keep you posted once this is resolved. Until then try to > compile without plugins. ;) Alrighty. Thanks, Bruno. From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 15:17:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328063B0BDE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11140-05 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A88413B09D1 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 20:17:23 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:17:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:17:25 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:27 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > yes, that's a bug i also encountered. Craig so far has no "fix" for > this. Will keep you posted once this is resolved. Until then try to > compile without plugins. ;) OK, I'm giving up. GM doesn't configure through because pwlib without plugins still references plugin symbols. E.g. with x.c: int main() {} and gcc -o x x.c -L/opt/opal/lib -lpt I get /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPluginsProviding(PString const&) const' /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetServiceDescriptor(PString const&, PString const&)' /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPluginManager()' /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::RegisterService(PString const&, PString const&, PPluginServiceDescriptor*)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Bye for now, Bruno. From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 15:26:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55F03B15E2 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:26:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11868-02 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:26:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7533B15DE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:26:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwR4m-0006Fy-FZ for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:12 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwR4k-0002Zx-Bu for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:10 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:10 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:10 +0100 Message-Id: <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:26:16 -0000 --=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruno, > I get > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPlugin= sProviding(PString const&) const' > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetServic= eDescriptor(PString const&, PString const&)' > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPlugin= Manager()' > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::RegisterS= ervice(PString const&, PString const&, PPluginServiceDescriptor*)' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status that's most probably Damien's missing opal/pwlib patch. There is still one patch missing which he does reckon is needed for GM2CVS which isn't yet upstream for some reasons. Maybe he can post it on the gm-dev mailinglist or tell us when this'll hit upstream. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCATdivdkzt4X+wX8RArWlAJ4uWDyH0Eb/phjWQpkt1qJSYvb3jQCfev6Y 0OQx+h6DTy4rT6yBIEZp910= =PDgE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 15:43:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF873B15F6 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:43:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13474-10 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:43:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A304D3B15EE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:43:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 20:43:16 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:43:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:43:18 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:26 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > that's most probably Damien's missing opal/pwlib patch. There is still > one patch missing which he does reckon is needed for GM2CVS which isn't > yet upstream for some reasons. Maybe he can post it on the gm-dev > mailinglist or tell us when this'll hit upstream. OK, I'll watch out for it or either try the next snapshots coming. Thanks a lot for your clarifications. Regards, Bruno. PS: Just fyi, one reason I'm trying this is SIP support. Since I've been fiddling with asterisk for two months right now and using various softphones on the way, I like to use GM because it's been best, regarding robustness, sound quality and latency. Also, one regular question on the * users list is which softphone to use, and I myself do recommend GM but people seem to prefer SIP for various reasons (registration/gatekeeper hassle, etc). Anyway, I know it's early but I thought I'd give it a shot ... :) From johannes@vanster.nu Wed Feb 2 21:26:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C653B06BE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30659-04 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail2.space2u.com (mail2.space2u.com [62.20.1.161]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF933B06BC for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [83.226.47.14] (c-0e2fe253.234-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.226.47.14]) by mail2.space2u.com (8.13.3/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j132QoO0028277 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:26:52 +0100 Message-ID: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 03:26:49 +0100 From: Johannes User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] YDL, BT and Skype X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:26:58 -0000 Hi! I have some small questions before starting to use GnomeMeeting: Is there a way for a non-linux-experienced user such as myself to install it on YellowDogLinux? Does GnomeMeeting work with Bluetooth Headsets? Can one call Skype Users/Log onto Skype accounts? What about AIMs? y.c. Johannes Sweden From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 2 23:40:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5685D3B077D for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03461-07 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF43B08F9 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:11:00 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020310105904643 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:10:59 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107357991.5083.6.camel@ganymede> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> <1107357991.5083.6.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1107405633.4041.4.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:10:33 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2005 04:41:00.0640 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F7DBE00:01C509AA] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:40:33 -0000 Well thanks for the reply, But I got able to correct the mistake... What I did that I included the path to qconfig.h in the command itself and it did work. But the problem was that that I had to run the two commands separately for making release and debug exes. Can anyone suggest me the proper way because I didn't find any thing related to include files in the Makefile and also I had to comment out the GSMCodecCapability Line because it was giving me the unreference statement. Well when I was done with the complete installation, I tried http://:1719 which gave me the property page but it asked me for the Username and Password. I tried admin/secret but in vain. Can you please tell me about the authentication problem. THanks and Regards, Ashutosh On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:56, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Ashutosh, > > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > > directory > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > > directory > > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > looks like a broken or incomplete Qt installation to me.. > > Just my 2 Ct. From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 2 23:44:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2340B3B066A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:44:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03628-10 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:44:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245813B08FA for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:44:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:14:35 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020310143404646 ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:14:35 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk From: Ashutosh Sharma To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502021825.24416.lurch@gmx.li> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> <200502021825.24416.lurch@gmx.li> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1107405848.4041.7.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:14:08 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2005 04:44:35.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[0FA8DE70:01C509AB] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:44:09 -0000 Hi, Well I didn't do anything like that. I was just doing the normal compilation process. But I was able to resolve the prob by including the path containing qconfig.h on the command line. But I don't know but I had to comment out the GSMCodec Line in the main.cxx otherwise it was not able to find the definition of that. REgards, Ashutosh On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 22:55, Stefan Bruens wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 15:49 schrieb Ashutosh Sharma: > > Hi all, > > > > I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. > > > > First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I > > tried "make both" then I got the following error:- > > > > //////////// > > > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl > > ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os > > -felide-constr > > uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > > from main.cxx:94: > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > > directory > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > > directory > > main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, > > PConfigPage*)': > > main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token > > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > I think you did something really stupid - make could not find gsmcodec.h, so > you copied it from somewhere on your disk? > > The gsmcodec.h which you have in /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/ is from > qtopia! > > Greetings, > > Stefan From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 03:24:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A723C3B0976 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:24:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13314-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:24:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFEB3B06AF for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:24:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81FE18C3D for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:25:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:24:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1107419058.3325.8.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:24:21 -0000 Hi, I don't think your error is due to my missing patch, but plugins are currently broken for some reason in pwlib. I will make an announce here when I consider GM Opal as usable :) Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 21:43 +0100, Bruno Hertz a écrit : > On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:26 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > > > that's most probably Damien's missing opal/pwlib patch. There is still > > one patch missing which he does reckon is needed for GM2CVS which isn't > > yet upstream for some reasons. Maybe he can post it on the gm-dev > > mailinglist or tell us when this'll hit upstream. > > OK, I'll watch out for it or either try the next snapshots coming. > Thanks a lot for your clarifications. > > Regards, Bruno. > > PS: Just fyi, one reason I'm trying this is SIP support. Since I've > been fiddling with asterisk for two months right now and using various > softphones on the way, I like to use GM because it's been best, > regarding robustness, sound quality and latency. Also, one regular > question on the * users list is which softphone to use, and I myself > do recommend GM but people seem to prefer SIP for various reasons > (registration/gatekeeper hassle, etc). Anyway, I know it's early but > I thought I'd give it a shot ... :) > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 03:25:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1BF3B06AF for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:25:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13499-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:25:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0D53B0819 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FA818C3D for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:27:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050202175523.GA16172localhost> References: <20050202175523.GA16172localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:25:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:25:58 -0000 Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 18:55 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > Hi, > > I am running against a wall with netmeeting 3.01 on XP + > meetspeex <-> gnomemeeting-1.2.0 on Fedora FC3: > > I am unable to get both sides to use at least one of > the low bandwidth speex codecs (i already played a lot > around with meetspeex rearranging/enabling/disabling codecs). > > gnomemeeting happily transmits to netmeeting using speexw 8kHz > (audio gets actually through), but netmeeting transmit either uses the > uncompressed G711 codecs (too much bandwidth), MS-GSM if I > enable it (bad audio quality) or nothing if I am allowing > only speex at gmomemeeting. (speexw and all others tried) > > Is there anybody who has solved the puzzle or is it > unsolvable? I am interested in audio only at the moment but > this can change easily :-) Have you checked the FAQ on voxgratia.org? they have a short howto. I would say that Speex is not installed correctly on the netmeeting side. > > Regards, > > Konrad > > PS: I second the question about the gnomemeeting on windows > status question. Is there anything to start with? > Unfortunately not... > What are the major problems expected? > > A very long compilation time. Except that, it should work. > PPS: anybody tried getting a DV camcorder (ieee1394) to > work with gnomemeeting? It is supposed to work :) > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 03:27:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3A63B07ED for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:27:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13664-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A593B06D1 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED5121AE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:29:12 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] YDL, BT and Skype From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> References: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:27:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1107419263.3325.14.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:27:45 -0000 Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 03:26 +0100, Johannes a écrit : > Hi! > I have some small questions before starting to use GnomeMeeting: > > Is there a way for a non-linux-experienced user such as myself to > install it on YellowDogLinux? > It should ship with the YDL installation CD. From there, you can install it as any other software on YDL, using RPM (I think). > Does GnomeMeeting work with Bluetooth Headsets? If the Bluetooth headset works with Linux, yes, it will work. > > Can one call Skype Users/Log onto Skype accounts? What about AIMs? > That's impossible, Skype is using a proprietary protocol. GnomeMeeting is currently compatible with any H.323 software. Next release will also be compatible with SIP software (including Windows Messenger, not MSN Messenger). > y.c. > Johannes > Sweden > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Thu Feb 3 04:19:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927383B0C74 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 04:19:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16719-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 04:19:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5A03B0996 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 04:19:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwd9I-00036v-9f for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:19:40 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwd9G-0003La-EG for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:19:38 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:19:39 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> References: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:19:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1107422378.5615.5.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] YDL, BT and Skype Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:19:57 -0000 --=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Johannes, > Does GnomeMeeting work with Bluetooth Headsets? just to add some small note to limit the expextations. Last time I tried the sampling was at 8kHz and thus no great audio quality. Maybe BlueZ folks have fixed this in the meantime, but don't *expect* miracles, only be happy when they occur. ;) --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAeyqvdkzt4X+wX8RApaBAJ91nPYNVzPE90vYKRfJWfp7skSzBACdEYnO P7Sti1UoQexn2fHMFLKCZeg= =nQND -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm-- From kk_konrad@gmx.at Thu Feb 3 05:31:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA42E3B0A91 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:31:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20483-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:31:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 690153B0764 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:31:00 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2005 10:30:57 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2005 11:30:57 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:30:54 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050203103000.GA25620localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:31:02 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:25:54AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 18:55 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I am running against a wall with netmeeting 3.01 on XP + > > meetspeex <-> gnomemeeting-1.2.0 on Fedora FC3: > > > [...deleted...] > > Have you checked the FAQ on voxgratia.org? they have a short howto. I > would say that Speex is not installed correctly on the netmeeting side. I read several times over the FAQ's and also the instructions on the speexw site (link from gnomemeeting.org's FAQ). It must be some obscure detail - I tried netmeeting on Win2000 and XP and it is always the same: NM receives speexw 8khz but refuses to use it on transmit. The most I could get from NM was MS-GSM but the sound was horrible (background noise like 'grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr' all the time besides the usual GSM artifacts) one detail: the codecs listed by meetspeex at bottom do show up in netmeetings drop down codec list. [....] > > > PPS: anybody tried getting a DV camcorder (ieee1394) to > > work with gnomemeeting? > > It is supposed to work :) I confess I did not even try since the 1394 device does not show up as a video4linux device. Did you mean 'work out of the box'? (will give it a try this evening anyways :) Perhaps there is some hack required (using the v4l loopback device)? The NM/GM speex issue is puzzling me most at the moment - it is difficult to get everybody using linux. An additional question: (I am almost totally ignorant about SIP) is it possible to have two SIP devices communicate to each other w/o having to use such stuff like registrar etc (as it is possible now with NM/gnomemeeting by simply entering IP address to connect? (assuming they are on the same network, no NAT etc) Regards, Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 05:40:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6613B0928 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:40:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21039-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:40:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5883B0926 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:40:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FEA183D4 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:42:04 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050203103000.GA25620localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <20050203103000.GA25620localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:40:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:40:38 -0000 Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > I read several times over the FAQ's and also the instructions on the > speexw site (link from gnomemeeting.org's FAQ). It must be some obscure > detail - I tried netmeeting on Win2000 and XP and it is always the same: > NM receives speexw 8khz but refuses to use it on transmit. The most I > could get from NM was MS-GSM but the sound was horrible > (background noise like 'grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr' all the time besides the > usual GSM artifacts) > > one detail: the codecs listed by meetspeex at bottom do > show up in netmeetings drop down codec list. > I have no idea about this, perhaps you could try to contact them? > I confess I did not even try since the 1394 device does not show > up as a video4linux device. Did you mean 'work out of the box'? > (will give it a try this evening anyways :) Perhaps there is some > hack required (using the v4l loopback device)? > That is not a video4linux device. You have to install a separate plugin for this kind of camera (either the AVC or the DC one) > > The NM/GM speex issue is puzzling me most at the moment - it > is difficult to get everybody using linux. > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > An additional question: (I am almost totally ignorant about SIP) > > is it possible to have two SIP devices communicate to each other > w/o having to use such stuff like registrar etc (as it is possible > now with NM/gnomemeeting by simply entering IP address to connect? > (assuming they are on the same network, no NAT etc) > yes you can do that. > Regards, > > Konrad > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From brrhtz@yahoo.de Thu Feb 3 05:43:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A39F3B0BBE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:43:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21072-08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:43:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C38713B0A71 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:43:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2005 10:43:41 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107419058.3325.8.camel@golgoth01> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107419058.3325.8.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:43:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1107427424.3961.0.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:43:44 -0000 On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 09:24 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think your error is due to my missing patch, but plugins are > currently broken for some reason in pwlib. > > I will make an announce here when I consider GM Opal as usable :) > Thanks, Damien. I'll be looking for it. Regards, Bruno. From kk_konrad@gmx.at Thu Feb 3 12:48:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0E53B07E0 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:48:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12728-08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:48:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D59F53B0984 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:48:27 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2005 17:48:27 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2005 18:48:27 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:48:24 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050203174824.GA6094localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:48:32 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > ...... > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? Thanks for the pointer - I was not aware of it. Today it crashed only one time... speex seems to work ok. Greeetings, Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 13:44:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0963B11E9 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:44:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16493-04 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A83E3B0B8A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.119.16]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E9FAD94 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:45:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050203174824.GA6094localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <20050203174824.GA6094localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:44:24 +0100 Message-Id: <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:44:33 -0000 Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 18:48 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > ...... > > > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > > Thanks for the pointer - I was not aware of it. Today it crashed > only one time... speex seems to work ok. > What crashed one time? > Greeetings, > > Konrad > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From gnome-Gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org Thu Feb 3 16:28:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BB73B0A4A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:28:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27375-04 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:28:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6509A3B06EE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:28:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CwoVd-00068m-S5 for Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100 Received: from 217.129.99.175 ([217.129.99.175]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100 Received: from markhellman by 217.129.99.175 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org From: Mark Hellman Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:27:41 +0000 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.129.99.175 Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss X-MailScanner-From: gnome-gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:28:19 -0000 Steve wrote: > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > know you are busy volunteers... GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 packages still are not available... On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more popular... Mark From kk_konrad@gmx.at Thu Feb 3 16:42:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5A83B07E1 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28481-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FA693B0B45 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:20 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2005 21:42:19 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2005 22:42:19 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:42:16 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050203214216.GA9919localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:42:23 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:44:24PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 18:48 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > > > ...... > > > > > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > > > > Thanks for the pointer - I was not aware of it. Today it crashed > > only one time... speex seems to work ok. > > > > What crashed one time? MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the windows users. GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it does not happen frequently) Greetings, Konrad From kk@verfaction.de Thu Feb 3 16:44:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C893B0D4C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28651-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F2E3B0C84 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwom9-00036z-I9 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:44:33 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwom7-0006kt-MV for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:44:31 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:44:31 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:44:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1107467071.5615.40.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:44:49 -0000 --=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark, > Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... not sure where this critisizm is being helpful, but if you want to support GnomeMeeting then you should provide binaries to Damien (or me). --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAps/vdkzt4X+wX8RAsoFAJ4qk0TzumDnfm4YU/GS3PfCh1xkIQCfcgKK DspDAnsngcv4VQ4l9s2wplY= =hYXy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz-- From craigs@postincrement.com Thu Feb 3 16:51:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E67F3B172B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29114-02 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDFE3B17A3 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.13] (rapido.southeren.com [10.0.2.13]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j13LokxB024174; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:50:47 +1100 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:50:47 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: Mark Hellman , Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-Id: <20050204083608.C98B.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:51:33 -0000 On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:27:41 +0000 Mark Hellman wrote: > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > know you are busy volunteers... > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE > 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 > packages still are not available... > > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was > released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were > made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... Let's just think about what you are saying. Skype is a company with dozens of employees, that was founded by a guy who made millions out of the Internet boom a few years ago. The company has additional venture capital funding and continues to earn revenue through the Skype-out service. They have a closed protocol, and closed source client, and they have no published schedule so they are free to change what they want, when they want to do it. GnomeMeeting is created by a team of volunteers. The people who work on it get paid nothing, it earns no revenue for them, and has no funding from anyone, other than from the very pockets of the people who work on it. GnomeMeeting is constrained by being compatible with the millions of the H.323 (and soon SIP) terminals already deployed, as well as having to work with the Gnome release schedule, and the OpenH323 release schedule. So it is no suprise that Skype can roll out stuff faster than the GnomeMeeting team. Who-da thunk.... Look at it another way. Do you think that the people that work on GnomeMeeting don't know what you are saying? Don't you think it is infinitely more frustrating for them than it could ever be for you? If you want to help address this problem, then step up to the plate and offer to create some Suse packages yourself. Or offer to test them if someone else does. But please don't make statements like this. At best, you are declaring yourself an insensitive clod. At worst, you are demotivating the very people who could solve the problem. Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 16:51:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921C93B177B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29125-03 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FA63B1765 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from 16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be (16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.119.16]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ED511BB9 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:52:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050203214216.GA9919localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <20050203214216.GA9919localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:51:18 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:51:37 -0000 Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > windows users. > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > does not happen frequently) > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 16:56:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477C13B0E85 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29479-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDF73B0F6B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from 16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be (16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.119.16]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01BDCC03 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:57:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:56:25 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:56:26 -0000 Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:27, Mark Hellman a écrit : > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > know you are busy volunteers... > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE > 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 > packages still are not available... > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was > released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were > made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... > I shouldn't answer to such a lame email, but I will do it. We are all volunteers doing this in our spare time. If nobody is doing a SuSE 9.2 package for GnomeMeeting, don't count on me to install SuSE and create one except if you pay me. Then I might consider doing this during the night (did I forget to mention I have a paid job during the day and that I'm coding on GnomeMeeting only in my spare time?) We have the same problem with RedHat. They do not make packages for us. When 1.2.1 is released I will remove from the website the distributions from which we get no help. Ah well, and you have the sources, so you can compile yourself. Try to do this with Skype. I'm getting sick of Open Source and of e-mails like this one. I have to refrain from cancelling the whole big thing and getting a life. Good night, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From franz@iptelenet.com Thu Feb 3 17:07:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0DA3B178A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30633-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.iptelenet.com (sql.iptelenet.com [82.133.46.42]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E7E3B1783 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from PortegeXP by iptelenet.com (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000042636.msg for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:07:04 +0000 Message-ID: <036201c50a3c$acb4c210$3200a8c0@PortegeXP> From: "Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet)" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:06:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Authenticated-Sender: franz@iptelenet.com X-Spam-Processed: sql.iptelenet.com, Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:07:04 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.133.46.45 X-Return-Path: franz@iptelenet.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Franz J Ehrengruber \(iptelenet\)" , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:07:51 -0000 > I'm getting sick of Open Source and of e-mails like this one. I > have to refrain from cancelling the whole big thing and getting > a life. Damien, I'm sure you read Craig's response by now, regarding Skype and not surprisingly hit the neil on the head. In the long term it pays off to stick to standards. Thanks for your contribution to the open source commubity. Regards, Franz. From gnome-Gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org Thu Feb 3 19:51:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329443B1659 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:51:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07022-03 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:51:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38663B14C9 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:51:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CwrgB-0005jt-PG for Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:35 +0100 Received: from bsn-77-212-200.dsl.siol.net ([193.77.212.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:35 +0100 Received: from i_p_a_u_l by bsn-77-212-200.dsl.siol.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org From: Paul Ionescu Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:51:05 +0100 Lines: 8 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bsn-77-212-200.dsl.siol.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: gnome-gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:51:47 -0000 Hi, I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? Does it support HAL too ? Thx, From martin.lohre@web.de Thu Feb 3 20:17:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C6C3B15E1 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:17:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08948-07 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:17:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp07.web.de (smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F27C3B1773 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:17:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from [62.245.160.43] (helo=[192.168.0.72]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE 4.103 #192) id 1Cws6Z-00069c-00 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:17:52 +0100 From: Martin Lohre To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:16:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> In-Reply-To: <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502040216.08937.martin.lohre@web.de> Sender: martin.lohre@web.de X-Sender: martin.lohre@web.de X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:17:54 -0000 --nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Damien, you are doing a great job here. Especially if considering that you are not= =20 doing it for money and in your spare time. As well as the other contributor= s. So thanks for writing this program, it is a nice pice of SW. Sometimes some people are just not the brightest ones. So, do not worry abo= ut=20 them and what they say, that would be just a wast of time. Martin Am Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 22:56 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Le jeu 03/02/2005 =E0 22:27, Mark Hellman a =E9crit : > > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > > know you are busy volunteers... > > > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, > > SuSE 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE > > 9.2 packages still are not available... > > > > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it > > was released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary > > were made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and mo= re > > popular... > > I shouldn't answer to such a lame email, but I will do it. > > We are all volunteers doing this in our spare time. If nobody is doing a > SuSE 9.2 package for GnomeMeeting, don't count on me to install SuSE and > create one except if you pay me. Then I might consider doing this during > the night (did I forget to mention I have a paid job during the day and > that I'm coding on GnomeMeeting only in my spare time?) > > We have the same problem with RedHat. They do not make packages for us. > When 1.2.1 is released I will remove from the website the distributions > from which we get no help. > > Ah well, and you have the sources, so you can compile yourself. Try to > do this with Skype. > > I'm getting sick of Open Source and of e-mails like this one. I have to > refrain from cancelling the whole big thing and getting a life. > > Good night, =2D-=20 Martin Lohre Konrad-Adenauer-Str. 16 D-85221 Dachau Tel.: +49-8131-617868 =46ax : +49-8131-617869 Mob.: +49-163-7130568 --nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAszYeBGwihagJ6ERAovkAJ4+hXa34XBsOMFX7//gJlCJORDKXwCgiY64 H2NpEzn1IsPHyP/OS+cCeIQ= =yYqe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz-- From conrad_b@yahoo.com Thu Feb 3 20:34:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49883B000B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09471-08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from web41521.mail.yahoo.com (web41521.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.94.128]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7D2B3B007F for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:18 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 91780 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2005 01:34:18 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=KQIlAk7sTLmWaMMTZmSw6rgkvsncjKnLsyAxap6+cvdxg+jiM9vqtyIoD6m5QVSFWdZd4UdPPX4ilDkP8jm6zR64Gx7qDsjAptVo53lB0Uhcg3gOP1fXmf7V8As4UaPEF+pgRIUfdOvKlJxImbdgnBO+Qm+hTn1oTqDFHn9AXOc= ; Message-ID: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.81.82.81] by web41521.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:34:18 CET Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:34:18 +0100 (CET) From: Conrad Beckert Subject: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:34:20 -0000 >>Try myphone.sourceforge.net?<< Well, I've installed it a while on my mother's machine - it happend to be a desaster since it caused the WinME to crash so frequently that I wasn't even able to vnc to the machine to kick it off. (MyPhone puts itself into autostart) Since then I'm to blame for each and every Windows crash on her machine :-) I contacted the author of MyPhone- he admitted some memory leak but didn't submit a patch or new version. A pity since it's a nice program. Since then I'm sticking to good old OpenPhone for my Windows buddies. (http://www.openh323.org) OpenPhone and the website too have some dark green patina but at least it works for all of us. (and nobody is trying to convince me to use Yahoo or even MSN instead of Gnomemeeting) Neosmt http://www.neosmt.com) could be an alternative. It comes with a Jabber client - with some obviously proprietary extensions for signalling. But it works perfectly without the IM (Tools/Media panel). To get into contact with Gnomemeeting, this is the only way. Neither gatekeeper settings nor the Kopete plugin work over the IM. Neither does a Jabber introduced H323 connection through (at least my) NAT. But cool, Speex works. Any other ideas for the Windows crowds? Conrad --- Damien Sandras schrieb: > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl > a écrit : > > > > > I read several times over the FAQ's and also the > instructions on the > > speexw site (link from gnomemeeting.org's FAQ). It > must be some obscure > > detail - I tried netmeeting on Win2000 and XP and > it is always the same: > > NM receives speexw 8khz but refuses to use it on > transmit. The most I > > could get from NM was MS-GSM but the sound was > horrible > > (background noise like 'grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr' all > the time besides the > > usual GSM artifacts) > > > > one detail: the codecs listed by meetspeex at > bottom do > > show up in netmeetings drop down codec list. > > > > I have no idea about this, perhaps you could try to > contact them? > > > I confess I did not even try since the 1394 device > does not show > > up as a video4linux device. Did you mean 'work out > of the box'? > > (will give it a try this evening anyways :) > Perhaps there is some > > hack required (using the v4l loopback device)? > > > > That is not a video4linux device. You have to > install a separate plugin > for this kind of camera (either the AVC or the DC > one) > > > > > The NM/GM speex issue is puzzling me most at the > moment - it > > is difficult to get everybody using linux. > > > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > > > An additional question: (I am almost totally > ignorant about SIP) > > > > is it possible to have two SIP devices > communicate to each other > > w/o having to use such stuff like registrar etc > (as it is possible > > now with NM/gnomemeeting by simply entering IP > address to connect? > > (assuming they are on the same network, no NAT > etc) > > > > yes you can do that. > > > > Regards, > > > > Konrad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- > _ Damien Sandras > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > v_/_ H.323 phone : > callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 03:11:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFFE3B1881 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:11:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30255-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:11:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62453B094D for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:11:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E871763D; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:13:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:11:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1107504691.3326.1.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: jpuydt@free.fr X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:11:36 -0000 Hello, There is no HAL support yet even though we are planning to work on that too (after the SIP port is complete). The DBUS component permits you to start and stop calls and to get various information about the current status. Julien can certainly tell more about it than me as he wrote that part. Our purpose is to permit integration with instant messengers, but it is still in its early stages. Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 01:51 +0100, Paul Ionescu a écrit : > Hi, > > I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? > Does it support HAL too ? > > > Thx, > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From miguelrp@gmail.com Fri Feb 4 03:14:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547503B18C2 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:14:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30516-09 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:14:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.249]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACB03B189A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:13:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so58499cwc for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=AnAWMqvTk2FofXDoIrCdwWNE6LR0ayrRSdBP2mtOriIiQVu8lZsdFt+71ZQGtiCT632Ez/GkmOWUjQS+uF0nh5HnmJeE2Dej0mSL6F87zIc1ZXGoSy9LjIB5IDBbXy+lYWNUGqRbiSXC/A5Qc1d1LTI3iVqn69UYzcK2iPOc0Aw= Received: by 10.11.99.36 with SMTP id w36mr101242cwb; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.11.99.27 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:13:27 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Rodr=EDguez_P=E9rez?= To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Rodr=EDguez_P=E9rez?= , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:14:38 -0000 No it doesn't. It would be could to make write pwlib plugins that autodetect devices based on hal information. But AFAIK there's still no reliable way in hal to detect v4l or sound decives. On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:51:05 +0100, Paul Ionescu wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? > Does it support HAL too ? > > Thx, > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 03:15:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C674A3B181B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:15:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30635-03 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:15:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214753B18BD for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:14:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7651763D for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:16:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:14:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1107504894.3326.5.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:15:43 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 02:34 +0100, Conrad Beckert a écrit : > >>Try myphone.sourceforge.net?<< > Well, I've installed it a while on my mother's machine > - it happend to be a desaster since it caused the > WinME to crash so frequently that I wasn't even able > to vnc to the machine to kick it off. (MyPhone puts > itself into autostart) Since then I'm to blame for > each and every Windows crash on her machine :-) > > I contacted the author of MyPhone- he admitted some > memory leak but didn't submit a patch or new version. > A pity since it's a nice program. > > Since then I'm sticking to good old OpenPhone for my > Windows buddies. (http://www.openh323.org) OpenPhone > and the website too have some dark green patina but at > least it works for all of us. (and nobody is trying to > convince me to use Yahoo or even MSN instead of > Gnomemeeting) > > Neosmt http://www.neosmt.com) could be an alternative. > It comes with a Jabber client - with some obviously > proprietary extensions for signalling. > > But it works perfectly without the IM (Tools/Media > panel). > > To get into contact with Gnomemeeting, this is the > only way. Neither gatekeeper settings nor the Kopete > plugin work over the IM. Neither does a Jabber > introduced H323 connection through (at least my) NAT. > > But cool, Speex works. > > Any other ideas for the Windows crowds? Find some talented and motivated hacker who can finish the windows port. I think that would be the easiest. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From alricococo@msn.com Fri Feb 4 03:16:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328A93B18A6 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:16:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30640-07 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:16:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay11-f12.bay11.hotmail.com [64.4.39.12]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1797D3B18C2 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:15:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:15:02 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 130.231.240.27 by by11fd.bay11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:14:03 GMT X-Originating-IP: [130.231.240.27] X-Originating-Email: [alricococo@msn.com] X-Sender: alricococo@msn.com From: "Jon Casasempere" To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:14:03 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2005 08:15:02.0703 (UTC) FILETIME=[A05ECBF0:01C50A91] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem with Video Tx quality X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:16:07 -0000 Hi!! I´ve just run my Gnomemeeting aplication and I have been able to make the video transmition betwen 2 laptops in a wireless LAN. The problem is that I can see the video but the quality is very bad. I think it´s not a problem with the webcam because bafore making the call the video quality is very good, but when the call is stablished I almost can´t see my shape in a green shadow. I have been changing the preference transmition setting but it´s not comming better. Could someone tell what can be the problem? Thank you in advance Jon Casasempere From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 03:41:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938B03B18AC for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:41:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32355-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975663B18B3 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D69F18644 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:43:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem with Video Tx quality From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:41:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1107506500.3326.21.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:41:42 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:14 +0100, Jon Casasempere a écrit : > Hi!! > > I´ve just run my Gnomemeeting aplication and I have been able to make the > video transmition betwen 2 laptops in a wireless LAN. The problem is that I > can see the video but the quality is very bad. I think it´s not a problem > with the webcam because bafore making the call the video quality is very > good, but when the call is stablished I almost can´t see my shape in a green > shadow. I have been changing the preference transmition setting but it´s not > comming better. > > Could someone tell what can be the problem? > > Thank you in advance > Can you upload a screenshot somewhere of the quality before transmission and after? Also, wouldn't you be using a Quickcam camera? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk Fri Feb 4 04:16:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAF63B1838 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 04:16:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02416-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 04:16:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.77]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DE553B1922 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 04:16:56 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 95471 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2005 09:16:56 -0000 Message-ID: <20050204091656.95469.qmail@web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [212.240.207.212] by web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:16:55 GMT Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:16:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Steve To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:16:59 -0000 Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, time-wasting arguments about one product/approach over another! I was just making a polite enquiry about whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. No promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone point me at some instructions? Steve Dundee, UK From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 05:25:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1183B1981 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:25:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06403-08 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:25:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A4D3B197E for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:25:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD441306A; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:26:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Damien Sandras To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204091656.95469.qmail@web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050204091656.95469.qmail@web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:25:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1107512711.3911.27.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:25:16 -0000 At the end of the month, we plan to release 1.2.1. I hope that we will have SuSE 9.2 packages for that moment, but I can not promise it. The person doing the packs is in exams, and SuSE is not doing them themselves. The same goes for RedHat. People are downloading packs from unknown sources on the web, they are untested, then they report crashes and problems. Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:16 +0000, Steve a écrit : > Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, > time-wasting arguments about one product/approach over > another! I was just making a polite enquiry about > whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. > > I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. No > promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone > point me at some instructions? > > Steve > Dundee, UK > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Fri Feb 4 06:06:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F1F3B06F7 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:06:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08623-02 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:06:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FBA3B0703 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:06:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cx1I4-0007kP-Vj for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:06:21 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cx1I3-00087k-4y for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:06:19 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:06:19 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:06:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1107515178.5563.37.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:06:24 -0000 --=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Conrad, > Since then I'm sticking to good old OpenPhone for my > Windows buddies. (http://www.openh323.org) OpenPhone > and the website too have some dark green patina but at > least it works for all of us. (and nobody is trying to > convince me to use Yahoo or even MSN instead of > Gnomemeeting) try openh323.sf.net or www.voxgratia.org instead. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCA1cqvdkzt4X+wX8RAkSGAJ9qIhHCx+Jc/OreVNXPaN3ulpuGOwCeKIOb x6jAQvd9tgh4z/QSiTD/tzU= =24tq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq-- From Alan.Sill@ttu.edu Fri Feb 4 06:32:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6303B1181 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09794-10 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from highenergy.phys.ttu.edu (highenergy.phys.ttu.edu [129.118.41.119]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A723D3B07F5 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (accs16-77.ttu.edu [129.118.10.221]) by highenergy.phys.ttu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104C9101AC5; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:32:04 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Message-Id: <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Alan Sill Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:32:11 -0600 To: Craig Southeren X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Mark Blake , xmeeting-ohphonex , 'Support@Codian.Com', support@codian.com, 'John Bain' , gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:32:15 -0000 Hi Craig and Damien, Was there ever a follow-up or wrapup session writeup, or conclusions=20 from this conference? In testing the openh323-based/pwlib-based=20 application ohphoneX (which is otherwise regarded as a blessing by this=20= community), a study by a serious but friendly commercial MCU vendor=20 (Codian) found the following defects, as listed below. I'd like to know whether these problems are in the openh323 or pwlib=20 layers, and thus common to GnomeMeeting, for example, or specific to=20 the otherwise very nice ohphoneX implementation. Apologies to Mark Blake for quoting his e-mail without permission, but=20= I think these are things that ought to be addressed by the ohphoneX/GM=20= developers and user community and should not have to be worked around=20 by vendors: On Jan 18, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Mark Blake wrote: > Although all the endpoint manufacturers attempt to adhere to the the=20= > various standards the quality with which they manage to do so varies=20= > tremendously from manufacturer to manufacturer. For instance of =93the=20= > big two=94 endpoint manufacturers we have seen something like 10x more=20= > bugs with one than the other. Typically these are real bugs that are=20= > not just a matter of interpretation. However there is almost always a=20= > work-around of some sort - so our code has quite a lot of stuff that=20= > attempt to detect various bugs in real time and implement=20 > work-arounds! > =A0 > > In the specific case of OhphoneX we managed to find the following=20 > major bugs / issues in only about 15 minutes of testing > > > 1) Bad H.263 bitrate advertisment > > 2) Inability to cope with some H.261 fragmented packets > > 3) Incorrect timestamps on H.261 media > > 4) H.261 encoder only uses I-macroblocks > > 5) OhphoneX does not correctly issue fast update requests in all = cases. > > So (1) is why H.263 calls do not work > > (2) is what was causing the corrupt video with H.261 but (3) would=20 > also be sufficient to cause major problems even if (2) were fixed. > > (4) is not a bug as such but means that OhphoneX is only using the=20 > most basic form of H.261 encoding which means it will need roughly 10x=20= > the bandwidth for the same quality of video compared to a =93full=94 = H.261=20 > encoder. > > (5) means that OhphoneX has poor resilience to packet loss / bad=20 > network conditions. > > =A0 > (2) and (3) are worked around in the forthcoming MCU build John=20 > previously mentioned. This is sufficient for H.261 video to work ok. > On Jan 11, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Craig Southeren wrote: > To all, > > The German Unix Users Group is holding the second annual Free > Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit n Geilenkirchen, Germany this > weekend and early next week. Myself and many other developers and = users > will be attending the event. If anyone is interested in attending, > please see the web page at: > > http://www.guug.de/veranstaltungen/telephony-summit-2005/ > > Craig > > = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org > > Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 > Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com > Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org > > Post Increment - Consulting & Services = http://www.postincrement.com > Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org > Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog =20 > http://www.southeren.com/blog > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Xmeeting-ohphonex mailing list > Xmeeting-ohphonex@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmeeting-ohphonex > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D : Alan Sill, Texas Tech University Office: Science 117, MS 41051 : : e-mail: Alan.Sill@ttu.edu ph. 806-742-3730 fax 806-742-1182 : : CDF New Office Bldg 52-102 ph. 630-840-3701 cell 806-790-7462 : =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From julien.puydt@wanadoo.fr Fri Feb 4 01:38:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1363B0A6B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:38:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24704-09 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp6.wanadoo.fr (smtp6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.25]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12E73B0957 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0606.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 376091C0028A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:38:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from hilbert.localdomain (AGrenoble-203-1-3-195.w81-49.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.49.75.195]) by mwinf0606.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E07CF1C00293 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:38:09 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050204063809919.E07CF1C00293@mwinf0606.wanadoo.fr Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm From: Julien PUYDT To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:39:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1107499176.7141.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:04:56 -0500 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 06:38:12 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 01:51 +0100, Paul Ionescu a écrit : > I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? > Does it support HAL too ? No. It includes what is needed to direct gnomemeeting from dbus ; and mostly what is needed for IM client cooperation. Snark on #gnomemeeting From hannesf@ee.ethz.ch Fri Feb 4 06:58:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14DA3B19CE for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:58:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11365-06 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:58:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4DC3B19CB for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:57:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (tranquillity.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.222]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB142D9353; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.217]) by localhost (tranquillity [129.132.2.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22811-01-5; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (80-219-165-204.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.165.204]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F27FD932F; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:29 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Hannes Friederich Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:31 +0100 To: Alan Sill X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ee.ethz.ch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:04:56 -0500 Cc: Craig Southeren , xmeeting-ohphonex , Mark Blake , 'Support@Codian.Com', gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org, support@codian.com, 'John Bain' , Andreas Fenkart Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:58:50 -0000 To everybody Inour testing sessions at ETH Zurich with various H.323 clients, we did =20= notice that H.261 video quality was good with all tested clients when =20= doing point-point conferences. The MCU currently in use at ETH Zurich =20= is a Radvision MCU 3. When connection to this MCU, H.261 is very bad as =20= soon as there are moving frames. The problems seem to be the same as =20 the developers of Codian did point out. GnomeMeeting is also affected, so this is cleary a codec-only problem. =20= GnomeMeeting 1.2 may need some patches in order to work with most =20 Radvision-MCU connections unless these connections are 7.5fps CIF. This can be done by adjusting the H.261 Capability-Settings in both =20 ohphone/GnomeMeeting. I posted this a couple of weeks ago but didn't =20 get any answer. Andreas Fenkart did investigate the problem a bit more closely. I don't =20= recall all details, but I think it has something to do with the used =20 H.261 encoder (vic) which seems to produce only a very basic H.261. =20 Perhaps Andy can give more detailed informations - he just started a =20 new job at a company and is obviously very busy right now. On behalf of the XMeeting project, we are very interested in a good =20 H.261/H.263 solution which can handle all professional H.323-endpoints =20= correctly. For those interested: ohphoneX 0.3.3 will be released soon and will =20 improve compaibility (e.g. re-enable calls to NetMeeting) and include a =20= compatibility matrix which is supposed to be used as the start-point =20 for further improvements. The roadmap of the XMeeting project will also be updated soon. With Best Regards Hannes Friederich XMeeting/ohphoneX software engineer Am 4. Feb 2005 um 12:32 schrieb Alan Sill: > Hi Craig and Damien, > > Was there ever a follow-up or wrapup session writeup, or conclusions =20= > from this conference? In testing the openh323-based/pwlib-based =20 > application ohphoneX (which is otherwise regarded as a blessing by =20 > this community), a study by a serious but friendly commercial MCU =20 > vendor (Codian) found the following defects, as listed below. > > I'd like to know whether these problems are in the openh323 or pwlib =20= > layers, and thus common to GnomeMeeting, for example, or specific to =20= > the otherwise very nice ohphoneX implementation. > > Apologies to Mark Blake for quoting his e-mail without permission, but = =20 > I think these are things that ought to be addressed by the ohphoneX/GM = =20 > developers and user community and should not have to be worked around =20= > by vendors: > > On Jan 18, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Mark Blake wrote: > >> Although all the endpoint manufacturers attempt to adhere to the the =20= >> various standards the quality with which they manage to do so varies =20= >> tremendously from manufacturer to manufacturer. For instance of =93the = =20 >> big two=94 endpoint manufacturers we have seen something like 10x = more =20 >> bugs with one than the other. Typically these are real bugs that are =20= >> not just a matter of interpretation. However there is almost always a = =20 >> work-around of some sort - so our code has quite a lot of stuff that =20= >> attempt to detect various bugs in real time and implement =20 >> work-arounds! >> =A0 >> >> In the specific case of OhphoneX we managed to find the following =20 >> major bugs / issues in only about 15 minutes of testing >> >> >> 1) Bad H.263 bitrate advertisment >> >> 2) Inability to cope with some H.261 fragmented packets >> >> 3) Incorrect timestamps on H.261 media >> >> 4) H.261 encoder only uses I-macroblocks >> >> 5) OhphoneX does not correctly issue fast update requests in all =20 >> cases. >> >> So (1) is why H.263 calls do not work >> >> (2) is what was causing the corrupt video with H.261 but (3) would =20= >> also be sufficient to cause major problems even if (2) were fixed. >> >> (4) is not a bug as such but means that OhphoneX is only using the =20= >> most basic form of H.261 encoding which means it will need roughly =20= >> 10x the bandwidth for the same quality of video compared to a =93full=94= =20 >> H.261 encoder. >> >> (5) means that OhphoneX has poor resilience to packet loss / bad =20 >> network conditions. >> >> =A0 >> (2) and (3) are worked around in the forthcoming MCU build John =20 >> previously mentioned. This is sufficient for H.261 video to work ok. >> > > > On Jan 11, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Craig Southeren wrote: > >> To all, >> >> The German Unix Users Group is holding the second annual Free >> Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit n Geilenkirchen, Germany this >> weekend and early next week. Myself and many other developers and =20 >> users >> will be attending the event. If anyone is interested in attending, >> please see the web page at: >> >> http://www.guug.de/veranstaltungen/telephony-summit-2005/ >> >> Craig >> >> = ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20= >> - >> Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org >> >> Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 >> Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com >> Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org >> >> Post Increment - Consulting & Services =20 >> http://www.postincrement.com >> Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org >> Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog =20 >> http://www.southeren.com/blog >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >> _______________________________________________ >> Xmeeting-ohphonex mailing list >> Xmeeting-ohphonex@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmeeting-ohphonex >> >> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > : Alan Sill, Texas Tech University Office: Science 117, MS 41051 : > : e-mail: Alan.Sill@ttu.edu ph. 806-742-3730 fax 806-742-1182 : > : CDF New Office Bldg 52-102 ph. 630-840-3701 cell 806-790-7462 : > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive = Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > Xmeeting-ohphonex mailing list > Xmeeting-ohphonex@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmeeting-ohphonex > From craigs@postincrement.com Fri Feb 4 07:12:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F4B3B19D0 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:12:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12543-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:12:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE6E3B17AB for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:12:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.116] ([10.0.2.116]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j14CAsxB026386; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:10:54 +1100 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 23:10:56 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: Alan Sill , "'John Bain'" , "'Support@Codian.Com'" , gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org, Mark Blake , xmeeting-ohphonex In-Reply-To: <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Message-Id: <20050204223500.0295.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:12:24 -0000 On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:32:11 -0600 Alan Sill wrote: > Hi Craig and Damien, > > Was there ever a follow-up or wrapup session writeup, or conclusions > from this conference? Several of the speakers provided copies of their presentations, but there was no formal publication produced. We intend to create such a publication next year. Links to my presentations can be found in my blog at: http://www.southeren.com/blog/archives/000104.html > In testing the openh323-based/pwlib-based > application ohphoneX (which is otherwise regarded as a blessing by this > community), a study by a serious but friendly commercial MCU vendor > (Codian) found the following defects, as listed below. I commented on these issues briefly on the OpenH323 list, but this was about the time the OpenH323 list server went offline and it appears that post never made it to the list. In essence, I agree that all of these observations are probably correct, but I am not able to spend the time required to fix them. I imagine Damien is in the same position. > I'd like to know whether these problems are in the openh323 or pwlib > layers, and thus common to GnomeMeeting, for example, or specific to > the otherwise very nice ohphoneX implementation. These issues are all probably in OpenH323 > Apologies to Mark Blake for quoting his e-mail without permission, but > I think these are things that ought to be addressed by the ohphoneX/GM > developers and user community and should not have to be worked around > by vendors: I'm uncomfortable with the language you are using here. The phrase "ought to be addressed" seems to imply an imperative that is inappplicable to an Open Source project consisting of volunteers who donate their time and expertise. We are driven by the need to "scratch" our personal itches, not to ensure compatibility with commercial products from any vendor. I agree it would be nice if these problems were fixed, but the reality is that this will require someone with both the knowledge and motivation to do so. So far, nobody has stepped forward. It occurs to me that the vendors to whom you refer have both the knowledge and the motivation. Perhaps they can use some of the revenue obtained from interoperating with our Open Source software to fund the developement of a solution to the problem they have discovered ? :) Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 07:33:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EBF3B0A42 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:33:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13588-10 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:33:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E6D3B0837 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:33:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE2C18AD1; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:35:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:33:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1107520436.3911.54.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Mark Blake , Alan Sill , xmeeting-ohphonex , 'Support@Codian.Com', Craig Southeren , support@codian.com, 'John Bain' , Andreas Fenkart X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:33:59 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 12:57 +0100, Hannes Friederich a écrit : > To everybody > > Inour testing sessions at ETH Zurich with various H.323 clients, we did > notice that H.261 video quality was good with all tested clients when > doing point-point conferences. The MCU currently in use at ETH Zurich > is a Radvision MCU 3. When connection to this MCU, H.261 is very bad as > soon as there are moving frames. The problems seem to be the same as > the developers of Codian did point out. > GnomeMeeting is also affected, so this is cleary a codec-only problem. > GnomeMeeting 1.2 may need some patches in order to work with most > Radvision-MCU connections unless these connections are 7.5fps CIF. > This can be done by adjusting the H.261 Capability-Settings in both > ohphone/GnomeMeeting. I posted this a couple of weeks ago but didn't > get any answer. > I don't remember having received that email and I don't find it in my archive. Can you send me the mail again so that it can be fixed in 1.2.1? Thank you, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 4 10:52:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE623B099A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:52:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24376-10 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:52:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E733B0A09 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:52:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:22:47 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020421224601136 ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:22:46 +0530 Message-ID: <000e01c50ad1$85fadca0$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:22:26 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2005 15:52:47.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[92841720:01C50AD1] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: openh323@openh323.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:52:29 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hello All, I want to know about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I = want to know about the performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large = no of endpoints. Well if anyone is having some test results then please = let me know because I require for the proof of concept of my project on = OpenH323 with OpenMCU. Thanks and regards, A.Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hello All,
 
       I = want to know=20 about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I want to know about = the=20 performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large no of endpoints. Well = if anyone=20 is having some test results then please let me know because I require = for the=20 proof of concept of my project on OpenH323 with OpenMCU.
 
Thanks and regards,
A.Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Fri Feb 4 12:14:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D243B0799 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:14:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29478-08 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:14:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.34]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B68E3B0775 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:14:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2005 17:14:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:14:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1107537242.4017.30.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:14:03 -0000 On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 02:34 +0100, Conrad Beckert wrote: > Any other ideas for the Windows crowds? Not really. I had the same problem a couple of months ago, when I tried to setup video calls with my friends and family. I couldn't get speex to work with netmeeting, and of course NAT and dynamic ip's are an obstacle too. The H323 client situation on windows seems to be lacking, while on the other hand SIP is well supported (Windows Messenger, XLite, SJPhone ...). Unfortunately though, the Linux SIP clients are somewhat lacking on their side, linphone isn't that good, SJPhone for Linux has no dialpad and XLite for Linux is only in it's beta stage. What I'm currently doing is having an asterisk server on my home LAN and translating H323 calls into SIP. I.e. H323 SIP Gnomemeeting <-> asterisk <-> NAT <-> Internet (register on FWD or sth.) and it works reasonable well, where the SIP connections work at least with GSM and iLBC (didn't try speex yet). When Gnomemeeting SIP support is available, the situation should generally become better regarding Windows interoperability, for voice only calls at least. Regards, Bruno. From steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk Fri Feb 4 13:05:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDE33B09A1 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:05:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32016-06 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:05:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.78]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DF433B08CD for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:05:16 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 16802 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2005 18:05:16 -0000 Message-ID: <20050204180516.16800.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [82.41.115.123] by web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:05:15 GMT Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 18:05:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Steve Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107512711.3911.27.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:05:20 -0000 Damien That's good news! The offer still stands though, if the person does not have time. Steve Dundee, UK --- Damien Sandras wrote: > At the end of the month, we plan to release 1.2.1. I > hope that we will > have SuSE 9.2 packages for that moment, but I can > not promise it. > > The person doing the packs is in exams, and SuSE is > not doing them > themselves. The same goes for RedHat. People are > downloading packs from > unknown sources on the web, they are untested, then > they report crashes > and problems. > > Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:16 +0000, Steve a > écrit : > > Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, > > time-wasting arguments about one product/approach > over > > another! I was just making a polite enquiry about > > whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. > > > > I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. > No > > promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone > > point me at some instructions? > > > > Steve > > Dundee, UK > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- > _ Damien Sandras > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > v_/_ H.323 phone : > callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > From cmor7763@alu-etsetb.upc.es Fri Feb 4 16:20:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288A73B168C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:20:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11372-01 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:20:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from gehry.upc.es (gehry.upc.es [147.83.2.21]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596873B1866 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:20:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from gehry.upc.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j14LJEFk021042 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:20:36 +0100 Received: from ackerman.upc.es (ackerman.upcnetadm.upcnet.es [147.83.2.243]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j14LHa5Y020815 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:17:36 +0100 Received: from [172.26.0.2] ([80.25.169.49]) by ackerman.upc.es (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2005020422173508:16721 ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4203E79F.5020101@alu-etsetb.upc.es> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 22:22:39 +0100 From: Christian Morales Vega User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: es-es, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Wideband CODECs? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 04/02/2005 22:17:35, Serialize by Router on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 04/02/2005 22:17:36, Serialize complete at 04/02/2005 22:17:36 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:20:40 -0000 Skype users say me they have better audio quality thanks to the use of iSAC, a wideband CODEC. Exist the possibility to use this CODEC with Gnomemeeting? Perhaps another one? Why Speex is limited to narrowband in Gnomemeeting? Thx. From derek@indranet.co.nz Fri Feb 4 16:26:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66673B178B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:26:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11534-07 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:26:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from enso.acheron.indranet.co.nz (unknown [203.167.203.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3D23B0B68 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:26:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from kauri (kauri.acheron.indranet.co.nz [192.168.1.109]) by enso.acheron.indranet.co.nz (8.9.3-20030919/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29668; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:26:02 +1300 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:26:02 +1300 (NZDT) From: Derek Smithies X-X-Sender: derek@kauri.acheron.indranet.co.nz To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability In-Reply-To: <000e01c50ad1$85fadca0$1970640a@Samyak.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: openh323@openh323.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:26:07 -0000 Hi, I have heard rumours of 70-80 concurrent calls to openmcu. You could have found this information from perusing the openh323 mail lists with a search tool. Derek. On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, asharma wrote: > hello All, > > I want to know about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I > want to know about the performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large > no of endpoints. Well if anyone is having some test results then please > let me know because I require for the proof of concept of my project on > OpenH323 with OpenMCU. > > Thanks and regards, > A.Sharma -- Derek Smithies Ph.D. This PC runs pine on linux for email IndraNet Technologies Ltd. If you find a virus apparently from me, it has Email: derek@indranet.co.nz forged the e-mail headers on someone else's machine ph +64 3 365 6485 Please do not notify me when (apparently) receiving a Web: http://www.indranet-technologies.com/ windows virus from me...... From gnome-Gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org Fri Feb 4 19:36:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38043B0777 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:36:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21582-02 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:36:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EB53B068E for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:36:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CxDvJ-0005H4-5m for Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:35:41 +0100 Received: from home-33027.b.astral.ro ([81.89.4.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:35:41 +0100 Received: from i_p_a_u_l by home-33027.b.astral.ro with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:35:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org From: Paul Ionescu Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 02:36:19 +0200 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <1107499176.7141.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: home-33027.b.astral.ro User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: gnome-gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: dbus in gm X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:36:37 -0000 OK, Thanks for the info. On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:39:36 +0100, Julien PUYDT wrote: > Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 01:51 +0100, Paul Ionescu a écrit : >> I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? Does it support >> HAL too ? > > No. It includes what is needed to direct gnomemeeting from dbus ; and > mostly what is needed for IM client cooperation. > > Snark on #gnomemeeting From asharma@samyak.com Sat Feb 5 00:24:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CA13B0707 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:24:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02217-02 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:24:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6203B0858 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:24:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:54:35 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020510543506673 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 10:54:35 +0530 Message-ID: <001101c50b42$edd1bda0$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:54:12 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2005 05:24:35.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB232A20:01C50B42] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 05:24:12 -0000 hi, thanks, but I just want to know whether if anybody has used OpenMCU and what were the results. Actually I read some statements like OpenMCU is not suitable as a product. But this was the infornmation from the forums 3 years back. Actually I want to know whether is OpenMCU suitable for large scale applications or if is there any other MCU available which is OpenSource and is better than OpenMCU and is readily available. Thanks, A. Sharma ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek Smithies" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 2:56 AM Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability > Hi, > I have heard rumours of 70-80 concurrent calls to openmcu. > > > You could have found this information from perusing the openh323 mail > lists with a search tool. > > Derek. > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, asharma wrote: > > > hello All, > > > > I want to know about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I > > want to know about the performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large > > no of endpoints. Well if anyone is having some test results then please > > let me know because I require for the proof of concept of my project on > > OpenH323 with OpenMCU. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > A.Sharma > > -- > Derek Smithies Ph.D. This PC runs pine on linux for email > IndraNet Technologies Ltd. If you find a virus apparently from me, it has > Email: derek@indranet.co.nz forged the e-mail headers on someone else's machine > ph +64 3 365 6485 Please do not notify me when (apparently) receiving a > Web: http://www.indranet-technologies.com/ windows virus from me...... > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > From dsandras@seconix.com Sat Feb 5 08:14:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7863B07B4 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:14:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22259-05 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:14:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C3A3B08D1 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:14:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.123.100] (31.210-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.210.31]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9908118F97; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:16:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Damien Sandras To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204180516.16800.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050204180516.16800.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:14:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1107609274.3193.6.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: kk@verfaction.de X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:14:36 -0000 We have had a contribution for the packages. Kilian will confirm when they are ok because we know there is a bug in the gcc from SuSE. Kilian will send a mail when we can confirm they are ready :) Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 18:05 +0000, Steve a écrit : > Damien > > That's good news! The offer still stands though, if > the person does not have time. > > Steve > Dundee, UK > > --- Damien Sandras wrote: > > At the end of the month, we plan to release 1.2.1. I > > hope that we will > > have SuSE 9.2 packages for that moment, but I can > > not promise it. > > > > The person doing the packs is in exams, and SuSE is > > not doing them > > themselves. The same goes for RedHat. People are > > downloading packs from > > unknown sources on the web, they are untested, then > > they report crashes > > and problems. > > > > Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:16 +0000, Steve a > > écrit : > > > Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, > > > time-wasting arguments about one product/approach > > over > > > another! I was just making a polite enquiry about > > > whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. > > > > > > I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. > > No > > > promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone > > > point me at some instructions? > > > > > > Steve > > > Dundee, UK > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > -- > > _ Damien Sandras > > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > > v_/_ H.323 phone : > > callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Sat Feb 5 08:17:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5A43B07A0 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:17:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22461-02 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168073B07B4 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.123.100] (31.210-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.210.31]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CE918F97 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:19:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Wideband CODECs? From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <4203E79F.5020101@alu-etsetb.upc.es> References: <4203E79F.5020101@alu-etsetb.upc.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:17:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1107609467.3193.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:17:47 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 22:22 +0100, Christian Morales Vega a écrit : > Skype users say me they have better audio quality thanks to the use of > iSAC, a wideband CODEC. > Exist the possibility to use this CODEC with Gnomemeeting? Perhaps > another one? Why Speex is limited to narrowband in Gnomemeeting? > If you are using CVS version of GnomeMeeting with CVS version of Openh323 you can use the Speex Wideband codec. It is not in 1.2.0 and won't be in 1.2.1 because it requires GUI changes: users will think we only provide Speex support as there are so many versions available :) In 2.00 you will have speex wideband support :) About iSAC, I think it is a commercial codec. I would say quality is good with Skype because it is audio-only. If you use audio-only with GnomeMeeting and a codec without compression like G.711 you will have *better* quality than with Skype, and less latency as you don't have an intermediary endpoint to route the streams like it is the case with Skype. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sun Feb 6 12:15:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7F93B087F for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12377-07 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50A93B0701 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2f9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.47.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cxq0O-0007BQ-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:15:29 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cxq0N-0007VK-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:15:27 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:15:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:15:33 -0000 Hello, I am looking for a gnomemmeeting setup for my environment and just started with VOIP. I have in mind several options, but I am not sure, which one is the most promissing one to follow....and most likely there are much smarter and better ones. If this is the wrong list, please let me know, if you know a more appropriate one. Here is my environment: I have an H323 gateway or proxy (Cisco proxy?) which is not under my control and where I can register one fixed IP address for my number. When I run gnomemeeting on my workstation and enter there under Edit/Preferences/H323 Settings/Gateway/Proxy Settings everything works. Nothing else to setup, no authentication etc. I dial h323: to call and receive calls when my number is dialed. When I am away from my workstation, I would like to call and receive calls on a laptop with dynamic DNS (running gnomemeeting). I have full control over the laptop. The workstation is still up and running, i.e. I can use it to forward or redirect calls. I am wondering, what you think about these options (or if you have better ones): 1) My assumption here is that ports 1718-1720 are used for the communication with the Cisco proxy (that is what I have seen with ohphone): Use my workstation to forward all openh323 communication from Cisco proxy to laptop and visa versa. Forward the ports 1719 and 1718 from the workstation to the laptop using an ssh tunnel: laptop$ ssh -A -R 1718:laptop:1718 -l rdorsch -N workstation Then I would need to forward all packets to port 1720 of the workstation to the Cisco proxy. Note that the workstation is not doing NAT for the laptop, so doing this might be not trivial. 2) Setup gnu gatekeeper at my workstation as proxy and let it forward all calls to and from the cisco proxy. Can gnu gatekeeper do this? I saw that I can setup gnu gatekeeper as proxy, but can gnu gatekeeper use the Cisco proxy itself? 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from the laptop to the Cisco proxy. 4) I think X and/or KDE habe options to forward sound. I could experiment with these, but I think VOIP developed for a good reason their own codecs ;-) Any comments or hints are welcome. Many thanks. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Sun Feb 6 12:30:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30313B09B5 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:30:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13212-10 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:30:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EAD3B0995 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:30:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (188-91.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.91.188]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84070648C for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:32:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:30:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:30:13 -0000 Hello, Le dimanche 06 février 2005 à 18:15 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hello, > > I am looking for a gnomemmeeting setup for my environment and just started > with VOIP. I have in mind several options, but I am not sure, which one is > the most promissing one to follow....and most likely there are much smarter > and better ones. > > If this is the wrong list, please let me know, if you know a more appropriate > one. > It should be the right list :) > Here is my environment: > I have an H323 gateway or proxy (Cisco proxy?) which is not under my control > and where I can register one fixed IP address for my number. When I run > gnomemeeting on my workstation and enter there under Edit/Preferences/H323 > Settings/Gateway/Proxy Settings everything works. Nothing else to setup, no > authentication etc. I dial h323: to call and receive calls when my > number is dialed. > Great. > When I am away from my workstation, I would like to call and receive calls on > a laptop with dynamic DNS (running gnomemeeting). I have full control over the > laptop. The workstation is still up and running, i.e. I can use it to forward > or redirect calls. > > I am wondering, what you think about these options (or if you have better > ones): > > 1) My assumption here is that ports 1718-1720 are used for the communication > with the Cisco proxy (that is what I have seen with ohphone): > > Use my workstation to forward all openh323 communication from Cisco proxy to > laptop and visa versa. > > Forward the ports 1719 and 1718 from the workstation to the laptop using an > ssh tunnel: > > laptop$ ssh -A -R 1718:laptop:1718 -l rdorsch -N workstation > > Then I would need to forward all packets to port 1720 of the workstation to > the Cisco proxy. Note that the workstation is not doing NAT for the laptop, > so doing this might be not trivial. > I'm not sure, but isn't there a possible problem for RTP? > 2) Setup gnu gatekeeper at my workstation as proxy and let it forward all > calls to and from the cisco proxy. Can gnu gatekeeper do this? I saw that I > can setup gnu gatekeeper as proxy, but can gnu gatekeeper use the Cisco proxy > itself? > Yes, I think so. I'm not a GNU GK expert, but I think it can do that for what I remember from its configuration. > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls on > my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from the > laptop to the Cisco proxy. > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. > 4) I think X and/or KDE habe options to forward sound. I could experiment with > these, but I think VOIP developed for a good reason their own codecs ;-) > Indeed. > Any comments or hints are welcome. > I think I would go for the Gatekeeper option. That is the easiest. You can forward incoming calls from the gateway to the workstation to your laptop without a problem. But I'm not sure outgoing calls will work, the gateway will most probably reject calls coming from your laptop, in that case, you will have to proxy things from inside the LAN. GNU GK seems the best way to do this. > Many thanks. > Rainer > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sun Feb 6 13:32:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3968C3B0767 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:32:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16968-04 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:32:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CED3B0995 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:32:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2f9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.47.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxrDI-0007K9-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:32:53 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxrDH-0007y4-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:32:51 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:32:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:32:55 -0000 Hello Damien, thanks for you immediate reply. I am going for the gatekeeper option. But since gnomemeeting call forwarding seems to be a lot easier, I guess, I would setup this one as a temporary (one way) solution. Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 18:30 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls > > on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from > > the laptop to the Cisco proxy. > > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, > that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be > possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. Hmm...how do I tell the gnomemeeting on my workstation the dynamic IP address, I get on my laptop (assuming that I have no physical access to the workstation in that moment)? Can I edit the configuration file and start gnomemeeting in a non-gui mode? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Sun Feb 6 13:46:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E073B0D5F for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:46:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17736-03 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:46:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE3C3B0D57 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:45:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (188-91.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.91.188]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9190129D3 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:48:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:45:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:46:01 -0000 Hello, Le dimanche 06 février 2005 à 19:32 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hello Damien, > > thanks for you immediate reply. I am going for the gatekeeper option. But > since gnomemeeting call forwarding seems to be a lot easier, I guess, I would > setup this one as a temporary (one way) solution. > Probably the best idea! > Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 18:30 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls > > > on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from > > > the laptop to the Cisco proxy. > > > > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, > > that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be > > possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. > > Hmm...how do I tell the gnomemeeting on my workstation the dynamic IP address, > I get on my laptop (assuming that I have no physical access to the > workstation in that moment)? Can I edit the configuration file and start > gnomemeeting in a non-gui mode? > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : gconftool-2 --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host 111.222.333.444 --type=string For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into account immediately. Another possibility would be to signup for a free dynamic DNS account : http://www.dyndns.org and use the dynamic DNS name. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sun Feb 6 15:55:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A1B3B06AC for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:55:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24397-09 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:55:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832C23B0907 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:54:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2f9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.47.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxtQn-0007Z3-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:54:57 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxtQm-0000wy-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:54:56 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:54:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502062154.55342.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:55:08 -0000 Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 19:45 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > gconftool-2 > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > 111.222.333.444 --type=string Debian has 1.0 in its testing and unstable branch, 1.2 is only in experimental: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnomemeeting.html I guess I most likely need $ gconftool-2 --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/always_forward true --type=bool (and switching it off again) Do you see anything which should make me upgrading to 1.2 ASAP. Switching to the experimental package means loosing all kind of security updates, etc. > > For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into > account immediately. Very cool! Just noticed that this also works for 1.0 > Another possibility would be to signup for a free dynamic DNS account : > http://www.dyndns.org and use the dynamic DNS name. Agreed. As mentioned above, I probably need to switch off and on forwarding. Many thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sun Feb 6 15:59:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB4B3B0AC5 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:59:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24696-06 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:59:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E36E3B0957 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:59:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CxtUq-0005L8-Ll for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:59:08 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CxtUo-00015j-Q5 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:59:06 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:59:06 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502062154.55342.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> <200502062154.55342.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26" Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:59:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1107723546.5751.38.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:59:12 -0000 --=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, > Do you see anything which should make me upgrading to 1.2 ASAP. Switching= to=20 > the experimental package means loosing all kind of security updates, etc. for now using the 1.2 debs is ok, as they should be security-safe (and only force new versions of pwlib and openh323 out of experimental). Thus the impact is quite limited. But you're free to wait until we'll move the whole tree dependant on new pwlib/openh323 to unstable. That should not take too long most probably. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCBoUavdkzt4X+wX8RAiLSAJ9OccYzwG/cjgjDpB+/p6xpF/IPhgCdHLXL ysTy7YwDmF7viepcIasAfU4= =IMDM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26-- From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 7 04:27:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B4E3B0859 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:27:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29728-02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:27:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9373B0653 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:27:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl25 ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:14 +0530 Message-ID: <013101c50cf7$4c9efb30$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:57:51 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2005 09:28:14.0718 (UTC) FILETIME=[597459E0:01C50CF7] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Bandwidth Control at Source X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:27:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Does any one have used Quicknet Line Jack and Phone Jack cards = under Linux? I want to know whether the bandwidth control is possible at = the source (h/w) level in Quicknet cards. Also whether the same is possible for any MPEG-4 cards which supports = H.263 codec.? I am also not knowing about any of MPEG-4 PCI based card , = supported under Linux and does support H.263. I need this info for my project. Regards, A bend in the road is not the end of = the road..Unless you fail to make the turn=20 =20 Ashutosh J Sharma Software Engineer Samyak Infotech Pvt. Ltd. 905-908, Abhijeet, Mithakhali six roads. Ellisbridge Ahmedabad-380 006 =20 asharma@samyak.com tel:=20 tel2: mobile: 91 (79) 26465758 91 (79) 55315021 91 9898487939 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 Add me to your address book... Want a signature like this?=20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
 
     Does any one = have used=20 Quicknet Line Jack and Phone Jack cards under Linux? I want to know = whether the=20 bandwidth control is possible at the source (h/w) level in Quicknet=20 cards.
Also whether the same is possible for = any MPEG-4=20 cards which supports H.263 codec.? I am also not knowing about any of = MPEG-4 PCI=20 based card , supported under Linux and does support H.263.
I need this info for my = project.
 
Regards, A bend in the road is not the end of = the=20 road..Unless you fail to make the=20 turn
Ashutosh J = Sharma
Software=20 Engineer 		Samyak Infotech Pvt. = Ltd.
905-908,=20 Abhijeet, Mithakhali six=20 roads.
Ellisbridge
Ahmedabad-380 006 =
asharma@samyak.com
tel:=20
tel2:
mobile: 		91 (79) 26465758
91 (79)=20 55315021
91 9898487939=20 =
Add me to your address = book... Want a signature like=20 = this?
------=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470-- From devel@tootai.net Mon Feb 7 06:16:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C7A3B1037 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:16:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02843-06 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:16:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mango.tootai.net (mango.tootai.net [217.11.129.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B673A3B0F4D for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:16:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (rob67-1-82-231-69-24.fbx.proxad.net [82.231.69.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by mango.tootai.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id j17BG5qI009784 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:16:06 +0100 Message-ID: <42074F20.8080807@tootai.net> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:21:04 +0100 From: daniel huhardeaux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gnomemeeting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Call numbering problem X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:16:16 -0000 Hi list, I face a strange problem: on each digit or letter from the number I want to call, when I enter it, the call is started. If I enter them very quickly, it happends each 2~3 digit. The same when I use backspace to correct or modify a number. No feature is set in preferences. DTMF is set to all. Any idea? GM 1.2.0 - 20041221 Debian SID kernel 2.6.10 with patch (swsuspend) Thanks -- Daniel Huhardeaux ______ _____ _____ ______ ______ __ enum +48 32 285 5276 /_ _// _ // _ //_ _// __ // / IAX FWD +1 7009 422493 / / / // // // / / / / /_/ // / sip:101 h323:121 @voip./_/ /____//____/ /_/ /_/ /_//_/.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 06:24:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDD93B1053 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:24:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03467-01 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:24:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25853B1035 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:24:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F29818C3C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:26:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Call numbering problem From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42074F20.8080807@tootai.net> References: <42074F20.8080807@tootai.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:24:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1107775475.29230.8.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:24:39 -0000 Hi, Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 12:21 +0100, daniel huhardeaux a écrit : > Hi list, > > I face a strange problem: on each digit or letter from the number I want > to call, when I enter it, the call is started. If I enter them very > quickly, it happends each 2~3 digit. The same when I use backspace to > correct or modify a number. No feature is set in preferences. DTMF is > set to all. > > Any idea? GM 1.2.0 - 20041221 Debian SID kernel 2.6.10 with patch > (swsuspend) > You are probably running GTK+ 2.6, they have changed something and now a callback that was only triggered when selecting something in the url's history is triggered for each key stroke. That bug is fixed in CVS and will disappear as soon as you will upgrade, ie as soon as our CVS packs are again built nightly. Kilian will most probably build new packs against the Mimas release of OpenH323 and PWLib for the 1.2.1 release shortly. > Thanks -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Mon Feb 7 12:37:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC3E3B11A0 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:37:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28417-02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:37:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 847B83B117B for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:37:36 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Feb 2005 17:37:35 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 07 Feb 2005 18:37:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:37:32 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050207173732.GA14125localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:37:38 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > > windows users. > > > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > > does not happen frequently) > > > > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. > -- > _ Damien Sandras > ........ Is this good enough? Konrad PS: ieee1394 is not working very stable with the current FC3 kernel but I have found an old bt848 card which works quite well. ========================================= gnomemeeting Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x71f9)! Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnomemeeting' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] [New Thread 108714928 (LWP 10974)] [New Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)] [New Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)] [New Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)] [New Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)] [New Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)] 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0x0092ff92 in _XEnq () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #3 0x0093036e in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #4 0x009314cb in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #5 0x0092d700 in XTranslateCoordinates () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #6 0x0056241d in gdk_window_get_origin () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #7 0x003e9b52 in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #8 0x003e9d9d in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #9 0x00c25368 in g_main_context_wakeup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #10 0x00c227bb in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #11 0x00c24242 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #12 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #13 0x0033a07e in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #14 0x0809df61 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfefaec4, envp=0xfffffdfe) at main_window.cpp:4271 Thread 8 (Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x009cbb46 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #2 0x0103b9a8 in PSyncPoint::Wait () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #3 0x02578776 in H323ConnectionsCleaner::Main () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.15.2 No symbol table info available. #4 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 7 (Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x01038e62 in PHouseKeepingThread::Main () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #3 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #4 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #5 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 6 (Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x050777d8 in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 No symbol table info available. #3 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 No symbol table info available. #4 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 No symbol table info available. #5 0x0810c3b0 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #6 0x040f33d8 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #7 0x080c7398 in GMZeroconfBrowser::Main (this=0x8118c60) at gm_contacts-zeroconf.cpp:537 m = {semaphore = @0x83f0067} #8 0x008b9bb0 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #9 0x00000000 in ?? () No symbol table info available. Thread 5 (Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #4 0x04ef6d1c in e_book_set_default_source () from /usr/lib/libebook.so.8 No symbol table info available. #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 4 (Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #4 0x0073fbff in link_thread_io_context () from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #5 0x00c791a4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x05dac458 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #7 0x00c3c8d2 in g_static_private_free () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #8 0x00000001 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #9 0x00000021 in ?? () No symbol table info available. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 13:04:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFA93B119C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:04:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30387-08 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:04:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50383B11D1 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:04:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (165-83.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.83.165]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC617A85A for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:07:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050207173732.GA14125localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <20050207173732.GA14125localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:04:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:04:55 -0000 Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 18:37 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > > > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > > > windows users. > > > > > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > > > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > > > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > > > does not happen frequently) > > > > > > > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. > > -- > > _ Damien Sandras > > ........ > > > Is this good enough? > Unfortunately not... :( Can you tell us when it is crashing? Is it random? > Konrad > > PS: ieee1394 is not working very stable with the current > FC3 kernel but I have found an old bt848 card which works > quite well. > > ========================================= > > gnomemeeting > Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x71f9)! > > Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnomemeeting' > > Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] > [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] > [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] > [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] > [New Thread 108714928 (LWP 10974)] > [New Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)] > [New Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)] > [New Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)] > [New Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)] > [New Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)] > 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #2 0x0092ff92 in _XEnq () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #3 0x0093036e in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #4 0x009314cb in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #5 0x0092d700 in XTranslateCoordinates () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #6 0x0056241d in gdk_window_get_origin () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #7 0x003e9b52 in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #8 0x003e9d9d in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #9 0x00c25368 in g_main_context_wakeup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #10 0x00c227bb in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #11 0x00c24242 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #12 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #13 0x0033a07e in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #14 0x0809df61 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfefaec4, envp=0xfffffdfe) at main_window.cpp:4271 > > Thread 8 (Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x009cbb46 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x0103b9a8 in PSyncPoint::Wait () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x02578776 in H323ConnectionsCleaner::Main () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.15.2 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 7 (Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x01038e62 in PHouseKeepingThread::Main () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 6 (Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x050777d8 in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x0810c3b0 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x040f33d8 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #7 0x080c7398 in GMZeroconfBrowser::Main (this=0x8118c60) at gm_contacts-zeroconf.cpp:537 > m = {semaphore = @0x83f0067} > #8 0x008b9bb0 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #9 0x00000000 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 5 (Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x04ef6d1c in e_book_set_default_source () from /usr/lib/libebook.so.8 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 4 (Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x0073fbff in link_thread_io_context () from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x00c791a4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x05dac458 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #7 0x00c3c8d2 in g_static_private_free () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #8 0x00000001 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #9 0x00000021 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Mon Feb 7 13:20:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330F03B06F9 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31453-07 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:19:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09E003B123C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:19:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Feb 2005 18:19:28 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 07 Feb 2005 19:19:28 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:19:21 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050207181921.GA14933localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:20:00 -0000 On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:04:53PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 18:37 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > > > > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > > > > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > > > > windows users. > > > > > > > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > > > > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > > > > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > > > > does not happen frequently) > > > > > > > > > > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. > > > -- > > > _ Damien Sandras > > > ........ > > > > > > Is this good enough? > > > > Unfortunately not... :( > > Can you tell us when it is crashing? Is it random? > To me it looks like random for now. I am trying to figure out how to reproduce it but for now I have not detected a pattern. (will try with speek 8k only and no video). Counterpart is Windows XP with MyPhone, speex 8k and no video too. it even happened immediately after startup. I was still able to continue voice conversation and if I remember correctly also video was still fine .... Greetings, Konrad. From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Mon Feb 7 14:53:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CCF3B0F1C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:53:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05023-06 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:53:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5FF3B0AC4 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:53:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2a9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.42.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CyEwn-0001id-00 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:53:25 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CyEwm-0004EX-00 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:53:24 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:53:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:53:33 -0000 Damien, Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 19:45 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 18:30 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive > > > > calls on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward > > > > calls from the laptop to the Cisco proxy. > > > > > > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, > > > that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be > > > possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. > > > > Hmm...how do I tell the gnomemeeting on my workstation the dynamic IP > > address, I get on my laptop (assuming that I have no physical access to > > the workstation in that moment)? Can I edit the configuration file and > > start gnomemeeting in a non-gui mode? > > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > gconftool-2 > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > 111.222.333.444 --type=string I did that now on the workstation machine and veryfied the settings with gconftool-2 --set ... But I do not receive anything on my laptop machine. Does gnomemeeting write a logfile which I could check? > > For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into > account immediately. > As mentioned before, I am running 1.0.2. The gconftool-2 changes take effect in the preferences box. Is that sufficient to be sure that the changes are effective? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 14:58:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9953B0933 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05237-01 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873D83B0AA1 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (165-83.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.83.165]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED79123FF for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:00:17 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050207181921.GA14933localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <20050207181921.GA14933localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:58:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:58:06 -0000 Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 19:19 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > To me it looks like random for now. I am trying to figure out how to > reproduce it but for now I have not detected a pattern. > (will try with speek 8k only and no video). Counterpart is > Windows XP with MyPhone, speex 8k and no video too. > > it even happened immediately after startup. I was still able to > continue voice conversation and if I remember correctly also > video was still fine .... > > Greetings, > > Konrad. That's extremely weird. Probably trying without video and with video preview disabled could be a good idea. It could be a bug in the firewire code (still experimental). -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 14:59:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E6E3B0B5A for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:59:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05339-02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:59:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668AE3B07A7 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:59:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (165-83.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.83.165]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA83A8DC for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:01:30 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:59:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:59:18 -0000 Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 20:53 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Damien, [...] > > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > > gconftool-2 > > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > > 111.222.333.444 --type=string > > I did that now on the workstation machine and veryfied the settings with > gconftool-2 --set ... > > But I do not receive anything on my laptop machine. Does gnomemeeting write a > logfile which I could check? > No but if you run it with "-d 3" you will see what it is doing. > > > > For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into > > account immediately. > > > > As mentioned before, I am running 1.0.2. The gconftool-2 changes take effect > in the preferences box. Is that sufficient to be sure that the changes are > effective? > Yes, the only difference between 1.0.2 and 1.2 is the name of the key, for some keys. If the change is effective, then that's ok. > Thanks, > Rainer > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Tue Feb 8 13:23:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BF03B1313 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:23:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22516-08 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:23:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC3DB3B0FE2 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:23:07 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2005 18:23:05 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2005 19:23:05 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:22:59 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050208182259.GA458localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:23:12 -0000 Perhaps this one is better: (both video send and receive disabled) I just tried to connect to 127.0.0.1 and got a busy sign as usual. Konrad PS: I am still in gdb. if you respond during the next few minutes I can do further diagnostics (but I have to go home soon :) (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/gnomemeeting [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 365)] Detaching after fork from child process 368. [New Thread 27118512 (LWP 370)] [New Thread 104651696 (LWP 373)] [New Thread 37608368 (LWP 378)] [New Thread 78207920 (LWP 379)] [New Thread 115141552 (LWP 383)] [New Thread 125631408 (LWP 400)] [New Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402)] [New Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403)] [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402) exited] [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404)] [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404) exited] [Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403) exited] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 (gdb) bt #0 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #1 0x0507aa77 in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #2 0x050738bd in sw_corby_orb_dispatch_message () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #3 0x05073a77 in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #4 0x05073c0d in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #5 0x0507749a in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #6 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #7 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #8 0x097de628 in ?? () #9 0x08b193d8 in ?? () #10 0x080b70d7 in GMZeroconfPublisher::Main (this=0x507d0ec) at zeroconf_publisher.cpp:262 #11 0x008b9bf8 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #12 0x00000001 in ?? () #13 0x00000001 in ?? () #14 0x00000000 in ?? () (gdb) f 0 0x507a7f6 : push %ebp 0x507a7f7 : mov %esp,%ebp 0x507a7f9 : mov 0x1c(%eax),%eax 0x507a7fc : jmp 0x507a806 0x507a7fe : cmp %edx,0x14(%eax) <======== crash <=================== 0x507a801 : je 0x507a80c 0x507a803 : mov 0x18(%eax),%eax 0x507a806 : test %eax,%eax 0x507a808 : jne 0x507a7fe 0x507a80a : xor %eax,%eax (gdb) i reg eax 0x72656e65 1919250021 ecx 0x97e0a88 159255176 edx 0x2 2 ebx 0x507d0ec 84398316 esp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 ebp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 esi 0x0 0 edi 0x97df9ae 159250862 eip 0x507a7fe 0x507a7fe eflags 0x10206 66054 cs 0x73 115 ss 0x7b 123 ds 0x7b 123 es 0x7b 123 fs 0x0 0 gs 0x33 51 (gdb) x/lx $eax+0x14 0x72656e79: Cannot access memory at address 0x72656e79 cat /proc/365/maps 00101000-001d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a 001d4000-001e6000 rw-p 000d2000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a 001e6000-001e9000 rw-p 001e6000 00:00 0 001e9000-001ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so 001ea000-001eb000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so 001eb000-00210000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 00210000-00211000 rw-p 00025000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 00213000-0022b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 0022b000-0022d000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 0022f000-004d8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 004d8000-004e1000 rw-p 002a9000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 004e1000-004e4000 rw-p 004e1000 00:00 0 004e6000-004ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 004ea000-004eb000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 004ed000-004f7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 004f7000-004f8000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 004fa000-0050c000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so 0050c000-0050d000 r--p 00011000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so 0050d000-0050e000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so 0050e000-00510000 rw-p 0050e000 00:00 0 00512000-00579000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 00579000-0057e000 rw-p 00066000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 0057e000-00580000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 00580000-00581000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 00581000-0058a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so 0058a000-0058b000 r--p 00008000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so 0058b000-0058c000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so 0058c000-0058d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so 0058d000-0058f000 rw-p 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so 00590000-0059f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 0059f000-005a0000 ---p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 005a0000-005a1000 r--p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 005a1000-005a2000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 005a2000-005a4000 rw-p 005a2000 00:00 0 005a4000-005b1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so 005b1000-005b2000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so 005b2000-005b4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 005b4000-005b5000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 005b6000-005be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 005be000-005bf000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 005bf000-005c3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 005c3000-005c4000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 005c4000-005c7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so 005c7000-005c8000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so 005c8000-005cb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so 005cb000-005cc000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so 005cd000-005d5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so 005d5000-005d6000 r--p 00007000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so 005d6000-005d7000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so 005d7000-005e1000 rw-p 005d7000 00:00 0 005e3000-005f4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 005f4000-005f7000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 005f7000-00605000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so 00605000-00606000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so 00606000-00612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so 00612000-00613000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so 00613000-00618000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so 00618000-00619000 r--p 00004000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so 00619000-0061a000 rw-p 00005000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so 0061a000-00641000 rw-p 0061a000 00:00 0 00643000-00649000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 00649000-0064a000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 0064a000-00663000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 00663000-00666000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 00666000-00672000 rw-p 00666000 00:00 0 00672000-0067b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so 0067b000-0067c000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so 0067e000-006a8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 006a8000-006a9000 rw-p 0002a000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 006a9000-006b6000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so 006b6000-006b9000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so 006b9000-006ca000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 006ca000-006cd000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 006d1000-006d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 006d4000-006d5000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 006d7000-006f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 006f8000-006fb000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 006fd000-00705000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 00705000-00706000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 00708000-0074e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 0074e000-00759000 rw-p 00045000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 00759000-0075a000 rw-p 00759000 00:00 0 0075a000-00764000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so 00764000-00766000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so 00766000-00772000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so 00772000-00773000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so 00775000-0078a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so 0078a000-0078b000 r--p 00014000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so 0078b000-0078c000 rw-p 00015000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so 00792000-008b5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008b5000-008b6000 ---p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008b6000-008b8000 r--p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008b8000-008ba000 rw-p 00125000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008ba000-008bc000 rw-p 008ba000 00:00 0 008be000-008df000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so 008df000-008e0000 r--p 00020000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so 008e0000-008e1000 rw-p 00021000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so 008e3000-008e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so 008e5000-008e6000 r--p 00001000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so 008e6000-008e7000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so 008e9000-008f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 008f8000-008f9000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 008fb000-009be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 009be000-009c2000 rw-p 000c3000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 009c4000-009d2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so 009d2000-009d3000 r--p 0000d000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so 009d3000-009d4000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so 009d4000-009d6000 rw-p 009d4000 00:00 0 009d8000-009e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 009e5000-009e6000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 009e8000-009ef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 009ef000-009f0000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 009f2000-00a07000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 00a07000-00a08000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 00a08000-00a0a000 rw-p 00a08000 00:00 0 00a0c000-00a1f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 00a1f000-00a20000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 00a22000-00a82000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 00a82000-00a89000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 00a8b000-00aa8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 00aa8000-00aaa000 rw-p 0001d000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 00aac000-00ace000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 00ace000-00ad1000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 00ad1000-00ad2000 rw-p 00ad1000 00:00 0 00ad4000-00ae5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 00ae5000-00ae6000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 00ae8000-00aef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 00aef000-00af0000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 00af2000-00af4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 00af4000-00af5000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 00af7000-00af9000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 00af9000-00afa000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 00afc000-00b04000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 00b04000-00b05000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 00b07000-00b0e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 00b0e000-00b0f000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 00b11000-00bd2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 00bd2000-00bd7000 rw-p 000c1000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 00bd7000-00bdd000 rw-p 00bd7000 00:00 0 00bdf000-00bfc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 00bfc000-00bfd000 rw-p 0001c000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 00bff000-00c79000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c79000-00c7a000 rw-p 0007a000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c7c000-00c7e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c7e000-00c7f000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c81000-00cbb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 00cbb000-00cbd000 rw-p 00039000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 00cbf000-00cc1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 00cc1000-00cc2000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 00cc4000-00ce4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 00ce4000-00ce5000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 00ce5000-00ceb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so 00ceb000-00ced000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so 00d05000-00d10000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 00d10000-00d11000 rw-p 0000a000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 00d17000-00d48000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a 00d48000-00d4b000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a 00d4e000-00d63000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 00d63000-00d64000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 00d66000-00d78000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 00d78000-00d79000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 00d7c000-00d83000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 00d83000-00d84000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 00d86000-00d9a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 00d9a000-00d9b000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 00db3000-00dbe000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 00dbe000-00dbf000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 00dc2000-00df3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 00df3000-00df8000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 00dfa000-00dfd000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 00dfd000-00dfe000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 00dfe000-00e20000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 00e20000-00e21000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 00f47000-00f49000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so 00f49000-00f4a000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so 00f4d000-00f4f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so 00f4f000-00f50000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so 00fcd000-00fdb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so 00fdb000-00fdc000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so 00fdc000-00fdd000 ---p 00fdc000 00:00 0 00fdd000-019dd000 rwxp 00fdd000 00:00 0 019dd000-019de000 ---p 019dd000 00:00 0 019de000-023de000 rwxp 019de000 00:00 0 0277f000-027dc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 027dc000-027df000 rw-p 0005c000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 029a2000-02a03000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 02a03000-02a05000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 02a05000-02a21000 rw-p 02a05000 00:00 0 02d15000-02da0000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 02da0000-02da4000 rw-p 0008a000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 02f08000-02f1b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 02f1b000-02f1c000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 02f1e000-02f81000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 02f81000-02f83000 rw-p 00063000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 03320000-03350000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 03350000-03351000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 03353000-033ae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 033ae000-033af000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 033b1000-03471000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 03471000-03476000 rw-p 000bf000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 03478000-034ac000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 034ac000-034ad000 rw-p 00033000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 034ad000-034b0000 rw-p 034ad000 00:00 0 035ec000-03612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 03612000-03616000 rw-p 00026000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 03693000-036ee000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 036ee000-036f3000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 036f5000-03db2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so 03db2000-03e00000 rw-p 006bc000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so 03e00000-03e01000 rw-p 03e00000 00:00 0 03e03000-04068000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 04068000-0408e000 rw-p 00264000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 0408e000-04095000 rw-p 0408e000 00:00 0 04095000-04096000 ---p 04095000 00:00 0 04096000-04a96000 rwxp 04096000 00:00 0 04b0b000-04bae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 04bae000-04bb2000 rw-p 000a3000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 04f3d000-05021000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 05021000-0502a000 rw-p 000e3000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 0502a000-05032000 rw-p 0502a000 00:00 0 05034000-05065000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 05065000-05068000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 0506a000-0507d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 0507d000-0507e000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 0507e000-05190000 rw-p 0507e000 00:00 0 051f4000-05242000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 05242000-0524c000 rw-p 0004d000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 059cd000-059ce000 ---p 059cd000 00:00 0 059ce000-063ce000 rwxp 059ce000 00:00 0 063ce000-063cf000 ---p 063ce000 00:00 0 063cf000-06dcf000 rwxp 063cf000 00:00 0 06dcf000-06dd0000 ---p 06dcf000 00:00 0 06dd0000-077d0000 rwxp 06dd0000 00:00 0 08039000-0810b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting 0810b000-08118000 rw-p 000d1000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting 08118000-08119000 rw-p 08118000 00:00 0 08119000-0811a000 ---p 08119000 00:00 0 0811a000-08b1a000 rwxp 0811a000 00:00 0 09516000-09861000 rw-p 09516000 00:00 0 b6856000-b6857000 ---p b6856000 00:00 0 b6857000-b7257000 rwxp b6857000 00:00 0 b7257000-b7258000 ---p b7257000 00:00 0 b7258000-b7c58000 rwxp b7258000 00:00 0 b7c58000-b7cb8000 rw-s 00000000 00:07 36208644 /SYSV00000000 (deleted) b7cb8000-b7cca000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1689784 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/l048013t.pfa b7cca000-b7d2c000 rw-p b7cca000 00:00 0 b7d94000-b7d9a000 r--s 00000000 03:03 1573058 /usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache b7d9a000-b7d9b000 r--p 00b61000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7d9b000-b7da1000 r--p 00b47000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7da1000-b7dce000 r--p 00b09000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7dce000-b7fce000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7fce000-b7fdf000 rw-p b7fce000 00:00 0 bfe5c000-bfe68000 rwxp bfe5c000 00:00 0 bfe68000-c0000000 rw-p bfe68000 00:00 0 ffffe000-fffff000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0 From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 8 14:39:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C71F3B0961 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:39:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26871-10 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:39:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1293B0BA5 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (94-99.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.99.94]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8692291; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:41:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050208182259.GA458localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <20050208182259.GA458localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:38:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: kk@verfaction.de X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 19:39:07 -0000 Good, at least we see it crashes in the ZeroConf code. And I also see that you are running libhowl-0.9.6. GnomeMeeting explicitely requests HOWL (the ZeroConf library) 0.9.7 because we are aware that there is a bug in HOWL 0.9.6 and that this bug can crash GnomeMeeting and has been fixed in 0.9.7. That means that : - the packages you are using are buggy - the maintainer of those packages forced HOWL 0.9.6 to be used when GnomeMeeting requested 0.9.7, so he had to modify GnomeMeeting for that. Would it be possible for you to contact the person who built the packages and to put it in contact with us? All of this wouldn't happen if we had support from RedHat and could offer correct packages to our users :( Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 19:22 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > Perhaps this one is better: > > (both video send and receive disabled) > > I just tried to connect to 127.0.0.1 and got a busy sign > as usual. > > Konrad > > PS: I am still in gdb. if you respond during the next few minutes > I can do further diagnostics (but I have to go home soon :) > > (gdb) r > Starting program: /usr/bin/gnomemeeting > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 365)] > Detaching after fork from child process 368. > [New Thread 27118512 (LWP 370)] > [New Thread 104651696 (LWP 373)] > [New Thread 37608368 (LWP 378)] > [New Thread 78207920 (LWP 379)] > [New Thread 115141552 (LWP 383)] > [New Thread 125631408 (LWP 400)] > [New Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] > [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402)] > [New Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403)] > [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402) exited] > [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404)] > [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404) exited] > [Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403) exited] > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] > 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #1 0x0507aa77 in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #2 0x050738bd in sw_corby_orb_dispatch_message () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #3 0x05073a77 in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #4 0x05073c0d in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #5 0x0507749a in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #6 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #7 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #8 0x097de628 in ?? () > #9 0x08b193d8 in ?? () > #10 0x080b70d7 in GMZeroconfPublisher::Main (this=0x507d0ec) at zeroconf_publisher.cpp:262 > #11 0x008b9bf8 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #12 0x00000001 in ?? () > #13 0x00000001 in ?? () > #14 0x00000000 in ?? () > (gdb) f 0 > > 0x507a7f6 : push %ebp > 0x507a7f7 : mov %esp,%ebp > 0x507a7f9 : mov 0x1c(%eax),%eax > 0x507a7fc : jmp 0x507a806 > 0x507a7fe : cmp %edx,0x14(%eax) <======== crash <=================== > 0x507a801 : je 0x507a80c > 0x507a803 : mov 0x18(%eax),%eax > 0x507a806 : test %eax,%eax > 0x507a808 : jne 0x507a7fe > 0x507a80a : xor %eax,%eax > > (gdb) i reg > eax 0x72656e65 1919250021 > ecx 0x97e0a88 159255176 > edx 0x2 2 > ebx 0x507d0ec 84398316 > esp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 > ebp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 > esi 0x0 0 > edi 0x97df9ae 159250862 > eip 0x507a7fe 0x507a7fe > eflags 0x10206 66054 > cs 0x73 115 > ss 0x7b 123 > ds 0x7b 123 > es 0x7b 123 > fs 0x0 0 > gs 0x33 51 > > (gdb) x/lx $eax+0x14 > 0x72656e79: Cannot access memory at address 0x72656e79 > > cat /proc/365/maps > > > 00101000-001d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a > 001d4000-001e6000 rw-p 000d2000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a > 001e6000-001e9000 rw-p 001e6000 00:00 0 > 001e9000-001ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so > 001ea000-001eb000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so > 001eb000-00210000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00210000-00211000 rw-p 00025000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00213000-0022b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 > 0022b000-0022d000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 > 0022f000-004d8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 004d8000-004e1000 rw-p 002a9000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 004e1000-004e4000 rw-p 004e1000 00:00 0 > 004e6000-004ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004ea000-004eb000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004ed000-004f7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004f7000-004f8000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004fa000-0050c000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so > 0050c000-0050d000 r--p 00011000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so > 0050d000-0050e000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so > 0050e000-00510000 rw-p 0050e000 00:00 0 > 00512000-00579000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 00579000-0057e000 rw-p 00066000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 0057e000-00580000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 > 00580000-00581000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 > 00581000-0058a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so > 0058a000-0058b000 r--p 00008000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so > 0058b000-0058c000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so > 0058c000-0058d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so > 0058d000-0058f000 rw-p 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so > 00590000-0059f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 0059f000-005a0000 ---p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 005a0000-005a1000 r--p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 005a1000-005a2000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 005a2000-005a4000 rw-p 005a2000 00:00 0 > 005a4000-005b1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so > 005b1000-005b2000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so > 005b2000-005b4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 > 005b4000-005b5000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 > 005b6000-005be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 > 005be000-005bf000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 > 005bf000-005c3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 > 005c3000-005c4000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 > 005c4000-005c7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so > 005c7000-005c8000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so > 005c8000-005cb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so > 005cb000-005cc000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so > 005cd000-005d5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so > 005d5000-005d6000 r--p 00007000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so > 005d6000-005d7000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so > 005d7000-005e1000 rw-p 005d7000 00:00 0 > 005e3000-005f4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 > 005f4000-005f7000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 > 005f7000-00605000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so > 00605000-00606000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so > 00606000-00612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so > 00612000-00613000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so > 00613000-00618000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so > 00618000-00619000 r--p 00004000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so > 00619000-0061a000 rw-p 00005000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so > 0061a000-00641000 rw-p 0061a000 00:00 0 > 00643000-00649000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 > 00649000-0064a000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 > 0064a000-00663000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 > 00663000-00666000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 > 00666000-00672000 rw-p 00666000 00:00 0 > 00672000-0067b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so > 0067b000-0067c000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so > 0067e000-006a8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 > 006a8000-006a9000 rw-p 0002a000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 > 006a9000-006b6000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so > 006b6000-006b9000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so > 006b9000-006ca000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 > 006ca000-006cd000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 > 006d1000-006d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 006d4000-006d5000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 006d7000-006f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 > 006f8000-006fb000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 > 006fd000-00705000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 > 00705000-00706000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 > 00708000-0074e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 > 0074e000-00759000 rw-p 00045000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 > 00759000-0075a000 rw-p 00759000 00:00 0 > 0075a000-00764000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so > 00764000-00766000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so > 00766000-00772000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so > 00772000-00773000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so > 00775000-0078a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so > 0078a000-0078b000 r--p 00014000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so > 0078b000-0078c000 rw-p 00015000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so > 00792000-008b5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008b5000-008b6000 ---p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008b6000-008b8000 r--p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008b8000-008ba000 rw-p 00125000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008ba000-008bc000 rw-p 008ba000 00:00 0 > 008be000-008df000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so > 008df000-008e0000 r--p 00020000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so > 008e0000-008e1000 rw-p 00021000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so > 008e3000-008e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so > 008e5000-008e6000 r--p 00001000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so > 008e6000-008e7000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so > 008e9000-008f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 > 008f8000-008f9000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 > 008fb000-009be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 > 009be000-009c2000 rw-p 000c3000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 > 009c4000-009d2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so > 009d2000-009d3000 r--p 0000d000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so > 009d3000-009d4000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so > 009d4000-009d6000 rw-p 009d4000 00:00 0 > 009d8000-009e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 > 009e5000-009e6000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 > 009e8000-009ef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 > 009ef000-009f0000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 > 009f2000-00a07000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 > 00a07000-00a08000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 > 00a08000-00a0a000 rw-p 00a08000 00:00 0 > 00a0c000-00a1f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 > 00a1f000-00a20000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 > 00a22000-00a82000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 > 00a82000-00a89000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 > 00a8b000-00aa8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 > 00aa8000-00aaa000 rw-p 0001d000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 > 00aac000-00ace000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 > 00ace000-00ad1000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 > 00ad1000-00ad2000 rw-p 00ad1000 00:00 0 > 00ad4000-00ae5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 > 00ae5000-00ae6000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 > 00ae8000-00aef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 > 00aef000-00af0000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 > 00af2000-00af4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 > 00af4000-00af5000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 > 00af7000-00af9000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 > 00af9000-00afa000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 > 00afc000-00b04000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 > 00b04000-00b05000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 > 00b07000-00b0e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 > 00b0e000-00b0f000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 > 00b11000-00bd2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 > 00bd2000-00bd7000 rw-p 000c1000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 > 00bd7000-00bdd000 rw-p 00bd7000 00:00 0 > 00bdf000-00bfc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 > 00bfc000-00bfd000 rw-p 0001c000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 > 00bff000-00c79000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c79000-00c7a000 rw-p 0007a000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c7c000-00c7e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c7e000-00c7f000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c81000-00cbb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00cbb000-00cbd000 rw-p 00039000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00cbf000-00cc1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 > 00cc1000-00cc2000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 > 00cc4000-00ce4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 > 00ce4000-00ce5000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 > 00ce5000-00ceb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so > 00ceb000-00ced000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so > 00d05000-00d10000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 > 00d10000-00d11000 rw-p 0000a000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 > 00d17000-00d48000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a > 00d48000-00d4b000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a > 00d4e000-00d63000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 > 00d63000-00d64000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 > 00d66000-00d78000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 > 00d78000-00d79000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 > 00d7c000-00d83000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 > 00d83000-00d84000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 > 00d86000-00d9a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 00d9a000-00d9b000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 00db3000-00dbe000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 00dbe000-00dbf000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 00dc2000-00df3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00df3000-00df8000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00dfa000-00dfd000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 > 00dfd000-00dfe000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 > 00dfe000-00e20000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > 00e20000-00e21000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > 00f47000-00f49000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so > 00f49000-00f4a000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so > 00f4d000-00f4f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so > 00f4f000-00f50000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so > 00fcd000-00fdb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so > 00fdb000-00fdc000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so > 00fdc000-00fdd000 ---p 00fdc000 00:00 0 > 00fdd000-019dd000 rwxp 00fdd000 00:00 0 > 019dd000-019de000 ---p 019dd000 00:00 0 > 019de000-023de000 rwxp 019de000 00:00 0 > 0277f000-027dc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 > 027dc000-027df000 rw-p 0005c000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 > 029a2000-02a03000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 > 02a03000-02a05000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 > 02a05000-02a21000 rw-p 02a05000 00:00 0 > 02d15000-02da0000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 > 02da0000-02da4000 rw-p 0008a000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 > 02f08000-02f1b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 > 02f1b000-02f1c000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 > 02f1e000-02f81000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 > 02f81000-02f83000 rw-p 00063000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 > 03320000-03350000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 03350000-03351000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 03353000-033ae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 > 033ae000-033af000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 > 033b1000-03471000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 > 03471000-03476000 rw-p 000bf000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 > 03478000-034ac000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 034ac000-034ad000 rw-p 00033000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 034ad000-034b0000 rw-p 034ad000 00:00 0 > 035ec000-03612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 > 03612000-03616000 rw-p 00026000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 > 03693000-036ee000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 > 036ee000-036f3000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 > 036f5000-03db2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so > 03db2000-03e00000 rw-p 006bc000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so > 03e00000-03e01000 rw-p 03e00000 00:00 0 > 03e03000-04068000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > 04068000-0408e000 rw-p 00264000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > 0408e000-04095000 rw-p 0408e000 00:00 0 > 04095000-04096000 ---p 04095000 00:00 0 > 04096000-04a96000 rwxp 04096000 00:00 0 > 04b0b000-04bae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 > 04bae000-04bb2000 rw-p 000a3000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 > 04f3d000-05021000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 > 05021000-0502a000 rw-p 000e3000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 > 0502a000-05032000 rw-p 0502a000 00:00 0 > 05034000-05065000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 > 05065000-05068000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 > 0506a000-0507d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 > 0507d000-0507e000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 > 0507e000-05190000 rw-p 0507e000 00:00 0 > 051f4000-05242000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 > 05242000-0524c000 rw-p 0004d000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 > 059cd000-059ce000 ---p 059cd000 00:00 0 > 059ce000-063ce000 rwxp 059ce000 00:00 0 > 063ce000-063cf000 ---p 063ce000 00:00 0 > 063cf000-06dcf000 rwxp 063cf000 00:00 0 > 06dcf000-06dd0000 ---p 06dcf000 00:00 0 > 06dd0000-077d0000 rwxp 06dd0000 00:00 0 > 08039000-0810b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting > 0810b000-08118000 rw-p 000d1000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting > 08118000-08119000 rw-p 08118000 00:00 0 > 08119000-0811a000 ---p 08119000 00:00 0 > 0811a000-08b1a000 rwxp 0811a000 00:00 0 > 09516000-09861000 rw-p 09516000 00:00 0 > b6856000-b6857000 ---p b6856000 00:00 0 > b6857000-b7257000 rwxp b6857000 00:00 0 > b7257000-b7258000 ---p b7257000 00:00 0 > b7258000-b7c58000 rwxp b7258000 00:00 0 > b7c58000-b7cb8000 rw-s 00000000 00:07 36208644 /SYSV00000000 (deleted) > b7cb8000-b7cca000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1689784 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/l048013t.pfa > b7cca000-b7d2c000 rw-p b7cca000 00:00 0 > b7d94000-b7d9a000 r--s 00000000 03:03 1573058 /usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache > b7d9a000-b7d9b000 r--p 00b61000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7d9b000-b7da1000 r--p 00b47000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7da1000-b7dce000 r--p 00b09000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7dce000-b7fce000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7fce000-b7fdf000 rw-p b7fce000 00:00 0 > bfe5c000-bfe68000 rwxp bfe5c000 00:00 0 > bfe68000-c0000000 rw-p bfe68000 00:00 0 > ffffe000-fffff000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0 > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Tue Feb 8 15:03:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8804F3B078A for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:03:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28858-02 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:03:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A8B63B16A9 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:01:33 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2005 20:01:31 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2005 21:01:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:01:23 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050208200123.GA3250localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:03:17 -0000 On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:38:57PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Good, at least we see it crashes in the ZeroConf code. > > And I also see that you are running libhowl-0.9.6. > > GnomeMeeting explicitely requests HOWL (the ZeroConf library) 0.9.7 > because we are aware that there is a bug in HOWL 0.9.6 and that this bug > can crash GnomeMeeting and has been fixed in 0.9.7. > > That means that : > - the packages you are using are buggy > - the maintainer of those packages forced HOWL 0.9.6 to be used when > GnomeMeeting requested 0.9.7, so he had to modify GnomeMeeting for that. > > Would it be possible for you to contact the person who built the > packages and to put it in contact with us? > > All of this wouldn't happen if we had support from RedHat and could > offer correct packages to our users :( > ... you see I am still at work :( I got GM from http://yum.nrpms.net/ (web site is at www.nrpms.net) The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. My system is fully uptodate Fedora Core 3 which unfortunately still has howl-0.9.6-6 .... Thanks Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 8 15:14:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA2E3B16BD for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:14:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29438-01 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:13:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCF23B1182 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:13:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (94-99.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.99.94]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2A118ADA for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:15:56 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050208200123.GA3250localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <20050208200123.GA3250localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:13:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:14:01 -0000 Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 21:01 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > ... you see I am still at work :( > :-( > I got GM from http://yum.nrpms.net/ > > (web site is at www.nrpms.net) > > The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was > responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. > ok please tell us what he answered. > My system is fully uptodate Fedora Core 3 which unfortunately still > has howl-0.9.6-6 .... > In that case that is better to disable howl than to force another version that the one that was recommended by the software ;) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Wed Feb 9 06:57:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0920E3B076E for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:57:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10178-05 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:57:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63A823B07AB for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:57:03 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Feb 2005 11:57:02 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 09 Feb 2005 12:57:02 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:56:59 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050209115659.GA11626localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:57:06 -0000 On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:13:32PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: ..... > > The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was > > responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. > > > > ok please tell us what he answered. > He will update to howl-0.9.10 as soon as time permits. Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 9 07:02:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D499E3B1242 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:02:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10417-10 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:02:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2563B1274 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:02:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14864C50F for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:05:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050209115659.GA11626localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> <20050209115659.GA11626localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:02:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:02:38 -0000 Excellent news, thanks for the feedback! I think (but I'm not sure!) that if you shutdown mdnsresponder, the bug won't happen. I'm really not sure, actually I don't remember and I could be wrong. Le mercredi 09 février 2005 à 12:56 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:13:32PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > ..... > > > The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was > > > responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. > > > > > > > ok please tell us what he answered. > > > > He will update to howl-0.9.10 as soon as time permits. > > Konrad > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Wed Feb 9 09:31:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870E43B1617 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:31:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18584-04 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:31:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B680B3B08A8 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:31:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from j385b.j.pppool.de ([85.74.56.91] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cyss0-0006Su-00 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:31:08 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cyss1-0005cH-00 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:31:09 +0100 X-IMAP-Sender: rd From: Rainer Dorsch To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:30:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> X-KMail-Link-Message: 119527 X-KMail-Link-Type: reply X-KMail-CryptoFormat: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline X-KMail-Recipients: GnomeMeeting mailing list Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: Message-Id: Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:31:11 -0000 Damien, On Montag 07 Februar 2005 20:59, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 20:53 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > > Damien, > > [...] > > > > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > > > gconftool-2 > > > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > > > 111.222.333.444 --type=string > > > > I did that now on the workstation machine and veryfied the settings with > > gconftool-2 --set ... > > > > But I do not receive anything on my laptop machine. Does gnomemeeting > > write a logfile which I could check? > > No but if you run it with "-d 3" you will see what it is doing. Thanks, good hint, brings lots of information. This is the log on the workstation, which is supposed to forward the call. Do you understand from this why gnomemeeting does not forward the call? 2005/02/09 15:12:02.245 6:17.792 H323 Listener:830a2b8 H323TCP Started connection: host=::ffff:119.152.191.172:3510, if=119.152.251.114:1720, handle=37 2005/02/09 15:12:02.246 6:17.793 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Started incoming call thread 2005/02/09 15:12:02.246 6:17.793 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Awaiting first PDU 2005/02/09 15:12:02.252 6:17.800 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Receiving PDU: setup 2005/02/09 15:12:02.253 6:17.800 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.253 6:17.800 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.253 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: MS-GSM{sw} <5> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.254 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.254 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <2> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.254 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <8> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.802 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <4> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.802 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: G.726-32k{sw} <9> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.802 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: G.711-uLaw-64k{sw} <6> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: G.711-ALaw-64k{sw} <7> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.256 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.256 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.256 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.257 6:17.804 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.257 6:17.804 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.257 6:17.804 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.805 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.805 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: MS-GSM{sw} <5> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.805 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <2> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.259 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <8> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.259 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <4> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.259 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: G.726-32k{sw} <9> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.260 6:17.807 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: G.711-uLaw-64k{sw} <6> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.260 6:17.807 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: G.711-ALaw-64k{sw} <7> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.260 6:17.807 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.261 6:17.808 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.261 6:17.808 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.261 6:17.808 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.262 6:17.809 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.262 6:17.809 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.810 H225 Answer:83c0d70 RFC2833 Handler created 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.810 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.810 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Handling PDU: Setup callRef=83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/09 15:12:02.264 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/09 15:12:02.264 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/09 15:12:02.264 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.812 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Source signal address ip$119.152.191.172:1720 and TCP peer address ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510 indicate remote endpoint is behind NAT 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.813 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/09 15:12:02.267 6:17.814 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/09 15:12:02.276 6:17.823 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 reason=EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 set to EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending release complete PDU: callRef=83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.280 6:17.827 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending PDU: releaseComplete 2005/02/09 15:12:02.280 6:17.828 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections 2005/02/09 15:12:02.281 6:17.828 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 closing: connectionState=NoConnectionActive 2005/02/09 15:12:02.281 6:17.828 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Application not accepting calls 2005/02/09 15:12:02.282 6:17.829 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 reason=EndedByTransportFail 2005/02/09 15:12:02.283 6:17.831 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Signal channel stopped on first PDU. 2005/02/09 15:12:02.285 6:17.832 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::Close 2005/02/09 15:12:02.286 6:17.833 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:83c0d70 2005/02/09 15:12:02.286 6:17.833 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 terminated. 2005/02/09 15:12:02.309 6:17.856 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 deleted. 2005/02/09 15:12:02.310 6:17.857 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections Thanks, Rainer From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 9 09:48:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BABD3B1118 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:48:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19861-09 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:48:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2243B08BD for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:48:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A2D18D12 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:50:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:48:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:48:06 -0000 Le mercredi 09 février 2005 à 15:30 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Damien, > Thanks, good hint, brings lots of information. This is the log on the > workstation, which is supposed to forward the call. Do you understand from > this why gnomemeeting does not forward the call? > yes > 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.812 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Source > signal address ip$119.152.191.172:1720 and TCP peer address > ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510 indicate remote endpoint is behind NAT The remote endpoint is not behind NAT. That's a bug in the openh323 release shipped with GM 1.2 when using ipv6, it will be fixed when we release 1.2.1. I'm not sure it triggers the problem as even with that bug, it should work. But I see this : 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 set to EndedByNoAccept I do not know your IP addresses, but I see no forwarding being done. Are you sure it is enabled? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Wed Feb 9 11:53:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C1B3B0904 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:53:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28116-04 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:53:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8708E3B116D for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:48:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Feb 2005 16:48:40 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 09 Feb 2005 17:48:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:48:37 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050209164837.GA16647localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:53:52 -0000 On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:02:34PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Excellent news, thanks for the feedback! > > I think (but I'm not sure!) that if you shutdown mdnsresponder, the bug > won't happen. I'm really not sure, actually I don't remember and I could > be wrong. > > when I shutdown mdnsresponder I get the following on startup: gnomemeeting [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 dont know yet if the crash frequency is now zero or not. ---------------------- furthermore: when quitting or clicking on the X then GM is not really terminated. I always have to ^C it as well. (independent of mdnsresponder) Greetings, Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 9 12:59:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7553B0A28 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:59:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00867-01 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:59:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DBF3B097B for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:59:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from 91-224.244.81.adsl.skynet.be (91-224.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.224.91]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A2A16EC9 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:01:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050209164837.GA16647localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> <20050209164837.GA16647localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1107971952.1434.4.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:59:12 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:59:29 -0000 Le mer 09/02/2005 à 17:48, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:02:34PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > Excellent news, thanks for the feedback! > > > > I think (but I'm not sure!) that if you shutdown mdnsresponder, the bug > > won't happen. I'm really not sure, actually I don't remember and I could > > be wrong. > > > > > when I shutdown mdnsresponder I get the following on startup: > > gnomemeeting > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 > Yes, that is a bug in howl. It should silently fail :-/ > > dont know yet if the crash frequency is now zero or not. > > ---------------------- > > > furthermore: when quitting or clicking on the X then > GM is not really terminated. I always have to ^C it > as well. > (independent of mdnsresponder) > When clicking on the X, GM is hidden. You can make it reappear by clicking on the icon in the KDE systray, or gnome notification area, or whatever it is called on your system and DE. You have to properly quit to make it exit. > Greetings, > > Konrad > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From jerome@coffeebreaks.org Fri Feb 11 07:27:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4873B1B1D for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:27:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02831-09 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no [62.101.193.41]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CF93B1B3C for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from dolcevita.localnet (host-81-191-122-9.bluecom.no [81.191.122.9]) by s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373D13389BA; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:27:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dolcevita.localnet) by dolcevita.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzZtP-00078H-Tn; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:27:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Jerome Lacoste To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CoffeeBreaks Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:27:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1108124847.8061.215.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: markhellman@techie.com X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:27:32 -0000 On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 21:27 +0000, Mark Hellman wrote: > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > know you are busy volunteers... > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE > 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 > packages still are not available... > > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was > released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were > made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... Mark, I will add a little argument to Damien and Craig's answers. It's not because you can get Skype for nothing that you can compare it to GnomeMeeting. I think you are mixing the different freedoms here. Skype is free as in beer (and not fully neither). GnomeMeeting is free as in beer AND as in speech. Competition is always good and should benefit to all of us in the end. Although I like what skype did to VoIP in general, i.e. raising the bar when it comes to simplify the setup & use, Skype locks you in a closed platform (and a suboptimal protocol). You are *today* 'free' to use Skype to make PC2PC calls, and you can use their service to make PC2PHONE calls (*). Nothing can say what will happen tomorrow. With GM you have the real Freedom. You can do what you want with it. Even start you own business around it as long as you stick to the rules defined by its license. You can expect this software to work not only today by also tomorrow. I find it sad that the main Linux distributions are not that involved with GM, because I believe this is today's Internet 'killer' application. If there was a little bit more investment behind it, GM could speed its development up and improve its support a lot. I would have expected someone like Michael Robertson to step up to the challenge, but he's probably busy with his new online music service... (Maybe will he read that mail?) Maybe to you, Cheers, Jerome (*) For my part I stick to prepaid cards as for long distance calls (Europe - South America), Skype Out has been twice more expensive and of lower quality in my experience, although it worked well for intra-Europe calls. From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 11 08:46:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90573B07EA for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:46:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08243-10 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:46:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5AE3B073A for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:46:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl25 ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:16:29 +0530 Message-ID: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:15:56 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2005 13:46:29.0156 (UTC) FILETIME=[1682F640:01C51040] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: openh323@openh323.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:46:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, Well can anyone please tell me any H.263 based card and compatible = WebCam + PTZ Camera (low cost) which must be supported by GnomeMeeting = and of course OpenH323. I am not getting any relevant information = regarding this. Actually I am confused in the output format of Camera and Input to the = H.263 supported card. Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is same as H.263. So does that mean = that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263 support. Thanks and regards. Ashutosh Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello All,
 
   Well can anyone please = tell me any=20 H.263 based card  and compatible WebCam + PTZ Camera (low = cost) which=20 must be supported by GnomeMeeting and of course OpenH323. I am not = getting any=20 relevant information regarding this.
 
Actually I am confused in the output = format of=20 Camera and Input to the H.263 supported card.
 
Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is = same as H.263.=20 So does that mean that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263=20 support.
 
Thanks and regards.
Ashutosh = Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0-- From kk@verfaction.de Fri Feb 11 12:07:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56C63B1C8E for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:07:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21509-06 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:07:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0D93B1C67 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:07:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CzeGD-0001pZ-A4 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:17 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzeGA-0008Vr-Qa for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:15 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:14 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:07:20 -0000 --=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharma, > Well can anyone please tell me any H.263 based card and compatible > WebCam + PTZ Camera (low cost) which must be supported by GnomeMeeting > and of course OpenH323. I am not getting any relevant information > regarding this. > =20 > Actually I am confused in the output format of Camera and Input to the > H.263 supported card. the camera format is irrelevant to the H263 encoding in GnomeMeeting. As long as there's no generic video codec hook in OpenH323 there's no way to get an unpatched GnomeMeeting to speak H.263. For now there's only the chance of using the old patches from CVS which have been rolled back until OpenH323 has the described generic hook. You camera will most likely speak V4L, V4L2 or AVC and be from there converted to the streaming formats of H.26x, that's why your camera doesn't need to speak H.263 itself. =20 > Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is same as H.263. So does that mean > that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263 support. > =20 MPEG-4 is a general video description in terms of standards. DivX and XviD are the non-streaming versions, H.264 is the streaming version of MPEG-4. H.263 is the streaming version of MPEG-2 and H.261 of MPEG-1. (please Craig correct me if i'm wrong) That's about the same discussion as why Ogg Speex (streaming format) isn't Ogg Vorbis (non-streaming format). They use the same ideas of codec design, but have different targets in terms of stream loss and connection reliability vs. compactation and image quality. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDOZBvdkzt4X+wX8RAqoVAJ4yfO4qkFM7bpEVs6RhOyzfWlO6dwCbBewI syW8ipIClA/aKk5GvIK+0OA= =Szl1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8-- From lurch@gmx.li Fri Feb 11 13:34:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CE43B0A54 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:34:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27118-05 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F83D3B0EE2 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:32:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IBR00917FILQZ@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1BIWj1a008310 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:45 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 1481 invoked from network); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:32:45 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:32:45 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:33 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support In-reply-to: <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502111932.42951.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:34:10 -0000 --nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 18:07 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi Sharma, > > > Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is same as H.263. So does that mean > > that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263 support. > > MPEG-4 is a general video description in terms of standards. DivX and > XviD are the non-streaming versions, H.264 is the streaming version of > MPEG-4. H.263 is the streaming version of MPEG-2 and H.261 of MPEG-1. > (please Craig correct me if i'm wrong) Mpeg-4 Part 2 is also known as DivX and Xvid. Although Mpeg-4 offers many=20 things Mpeg-2 does not, especially in terms of higher level object=20 representations, but in reality they don't differ much. The better coding=20 efficiency of Mpeg-4 is only due to some improvements in the details of the= =20 coding scheme. Mpeg-4 has a higher resolution for the motion compensation,= =20 offers different sizes for the motion compensation blocks and some other=20 niceties. H.263 is more or less the same as Mpeg-2, H.263+ is more or less= =20 the same as Mpeg-4 Part 2. Mpeg-4 Part 10 is also known as AVC or H.264 (in contrast to the older=20 standards, MPEG and ITU have created a joint project and the standards are= =20 this time not only similar, but exactly the same). Part 10 is based on the= =20 works of Part 2 and h.263+, so again it is based on the same coding=20 principles (DCT and Motion Compensation), but it offers again more=20 flexibility in the details of coding. It introduces some new ideas like CAB= AC=20 instead of Huffman coding, which seems to be very efficient ... > That's about the same discussion as why Ogg Speex (streaming format) > isn't Ogg Vorbis (non-streaming format). They use the same ideas of > codec design, but have different targets in terms of stream loss and > connection reliability vs. compactation and image quality. Here you are completely wrong. Speex is speech coding. The coding design is= =20 based on a model of speech synthesis - The oscilation of the vocal chord ha= s=20 a fundamental frequency, this fundamental frequency is transmitted, the=20 higher frequencies of the vocal chord are formed by the oral apparatus, whi= ch=20 can be thought of as a filter system, whose coefficients are transferred,=20 too. These principles are used by every speech codec in use. Vorbis (as mp3) are modelled after the human aural system. Quiet tones are= =20 masked by louder tones of a similar frequency, so you have to transfer only= =20 the louder tone. This difference is the reason for music transferred over a speech codec oft= en=20 sounding bad. If the music is similar to spoken language (A solo vocalist, = a=20 single trumpet or even a violin), it sounds quite good, but transferring a= =20 drum or a full band or orchestra wont work well. If a codec is suited for streaming depends most times not on the codec itse= lf,=20 but on the container format (.avi, .mov, .ogg, .mp4). Critical for realtime= =20 streaming (Audio/Video conference, Live TV) are coding delays introduced by= =20 the codec. Hope this clarifys the differences, Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=C3=BCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDPpKb39KPYz+qlMRAuxVAJ9wG/Z2eLrfbWtDxIIkBOhyIPOUywCfas2f 02wiQ5BdTg9HXTPJqrhgj/E= =aBS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf-- From franz@iptelenet.com Fri Feb 11 18:44:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046C23B0B49 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:44:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11715-09 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:44:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.iptelenet.com (sql.iptelenet.com [82.133.46.42]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBF93B0DAD for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:44:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from PortegeXP by iptelenet.com (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000044519.msg for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:43:53 +0000 Message-ID: <003b01c51093$8fc2c370$3200a8c0@PortegeXP> From: "Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet)" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1108124847.8061.215.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:44:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Authenticated-Sender: franz@iptelenet.com X-Spam-Processed: sql.iptelenet.com, Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:43:53 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.133.46.45 X-Return-Path: franz@iptelenet.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Franz J Ehrengruber \(iptelenet\)" , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:44:18 -0000 > Nothing can say what will happen tomorrow. (Skype) > With GM you have the real Freedom. You can do what you > want with it. Even start you own business around it as long as > you stick to the rules defined by its license. You can expect > this software to work not only today by also tomorrow. Well said Jerome. Regards, Franz. From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 11 23:27:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01D23B0735 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:27:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22995-09 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:27:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE82F3B0061 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:27:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl25 ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:57:41 +0530 Message-ID: <008d01c510bb$1de4f480$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: , "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com><1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> <200502111932.42951.lurch@gmx.li> Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:57:09 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2005 04:27:41.0453 (UTC) FILETIME=[30DB3BD0:01C510BB] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:27:18 -0000 hi, Thanks for this information. So if H.263 is as good as MPEG-2 card, so does that mean that I can have MPEG-2 based card for the support of H.263. Actually my problem is that how to support H.263 codec in GnomemMeeting. Please correct me if I am wrong. And can anyone please tell me any such card. Actually I need to freeze some H/W requirements for this. One more thing related to the Camera Query. It means I have to patch GnomeMeeting for the support of H.263. But I have patched the OpenH323 with the famous ffmpeg library which voxgratia says that it is H.263 codec support. So does that mean that I need to separately patch my GnomeMeeting with H.263 codec support. If yes then can you please tell me from where can I get that patch. And also from the discussion from you and Mr. Kilian I understood that I can have any WebCam/PTZ Cam for my Videoconferencing application which is supported by Linux. Is that true or I am making some mistake. Anyway thanks for the help. Regards, Ashutosh Sharma. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Bruens" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 12:02 AM Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > From yochanon@yahoo.com Sat Feb 12 04:48:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD85D3B06F8 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:48:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03523-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:48:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from outbound4.mail.tds.net (outbound4.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605223B06D8 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:48:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from prsstnnas01-pool0-a243.prsstn.tds.net (prsstnnas01-pool0-a243.prsstn.tds.net [69.21.62.243]) by outbound4.mail.tds.net (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j1C9mQNG010871 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:48:27 -0600 (CST) From: JB To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:50:08 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502120350.08819.yochanon@yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Trying to build a SuSE 9.2 rpm, but... X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yochanon@yahoo.com, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:48:30 -0000 Hi gang, I just downloaded the latest tarbal of gnomemeeting and did this in a terminal to try and make a tarball: rpmbuild -ts gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz Unfortunately I'm not very good at this kind of thing, having not done it very many times. This is what was returned: error: Name field must be present in package: (main package) error: Version field must be present in package: (main package) error: Release field must be present in package: (main package) error: Summary field must be present in package: (main package) error: Group field must be present in package: (main package) error: License field must be present in package: (main package) So, if anyone has any ideas what I need to do to fix this to be able to make an rpm out of this, I'd sure be grateful. Remember to try and keep it kinda simple, if possible, heh. Thanks, John From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 07:54:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002963B0D71 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:54:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12958-05 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:54:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2181A3B0D68 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:54:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwn3-00088b-UR for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:26 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwn1-00015E-MY for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <008d01c510bb$1de4f480$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> <200502111932.42951.lurch@gmx.li> <008d01c510bb$1de4f480$1970640a@Samyak.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1108212863.7324.7.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:54:31 -0000 --=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharma, > Thanks for this information. So if H.263 is as good as MPEG-2 card, so > does that mean that I can have MPEG-2 based card for the support of H.263= . > Actually my problem is that how to support H.263 codec in GnomemMeeting. > Please correct me if I am wrong. > And can anyone please tell me any such card. > Actually I need to freeze some H/W requirements for this. I'm not aware that any hardware acceleration is currently working with the ffmpeg in OpenH323. But this is the wrong list to ask for this. Maybe Craig can comment on how to use some modern MPEG-2 accelleration of current VGA cards to achieve this (if there is any solution so far). Yet from a GM point of view, that's all within OpenH323 and all GM would do is ask it to send H263 with the video-feed derived from PWLib. Nothing of the transcoding is done in GnomeMeeting, only the user frontend to control the libs is within the GnomeMeeting code (and ILS and stuff - but that's nothing to do with H.263). > One more thing related to the Camera Query. It means I have to patch > GnomeMeeting for the support of H.263. But I have patched the OpenH323 wi= th > the famous ffmpeg library which voxgratia says that it is H.263 codec > support. So does that mean that I need to separately patch my GnomeMeetin= g > with H.263 codec support. If yes then can you please tell me from where c= an > I get that patch. There is no public place where we host it. It gotta be in CVS though and maybe somenoe from this ML still has a copy of it and will share it with you. But yes, you're right that you need both support in OpenH323 to do the actual coding *and* support in GnomeMeeting to ask for this encoding to actually happen. The GnomeMeeting patch is needed to make the handshake recognize H263 as valid local codec (for it's not generic and therefore not "published" alone by patching OpenH323). > And also from the discussion from you and Mr. Kilian I understood that I = can > have any WebCam/PTZ Cam for my Videoconferencing application which is > supported by Linux. Is that true or I am making some mistake. *g* my name is european notation, i.e. Kilian is my first name. ;) Yes, you're right. The video signal is received by whatever comes through pwlib and then fed into OpenH323 for recoding. That means anything that PWLib can display will work (currently V4L, V4L2, AVC and DC cams). None of the WLAN (802.11b/g/a) cams will work and neither will JPEG-cams unless they have a V4L or V4L2 interface driver. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDfx+vdkzt4X+wX8RAroPAJwJTpU7Z9eG2MNQbT0uY6P8ZUapiwCfZdn9 DOpJNfk/AwH+ZhLirNQJJGo= =0e6Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W-- From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 07:56:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE9C3B09DC for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:56:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12994-06 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:56:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145F83B07B9 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:56:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwor-00089I-B5; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:17 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwop-000162-CI; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:15 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:15 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: yochanon@yahoo.com, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502120350.08819.yochanon@yahoo.com> References: <200502120350.08819.yochanon@yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1108212974.7324.10.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Trying to build a SuSE 9.2 rpm, but... X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:56:24 -0000 --=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi John, > rpmbuild -ts gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz we don't ship a *.spec in the tarball. Therefore this won't work. You need to use the src.rpms for your distro if you need to rebuild binary rpms. However we don't recommend building from source as there's a zillion problems around to get rid of for a working GnomeMeeting. Thus if there is a ready-to-be-installed rpm for your distro, please use it. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDfzuvdkzt4X+wX8RAnFPAJ4hTfXNBR9+nNQWKh7kSoNYgNCVNwCfUoHv ty/p5OFokfro8g/Ck3ZxOBI= =9uYF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb-- From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sat Feb 12 09:41:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8954E3B080E for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18830-01 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C634A3B0CBE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from j3c20.j.pppool.de ([85.74.60.32] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzyT2-0001mr-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:41:52 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzyT8-0004mV-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:41:58 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:41:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:41:55 -0000 Damien, Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 15:48 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.812 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 > > Source signal address ip$119.152.191.172:1720 and TCP peer address > > ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510 indicate remote endpoint is behind NAT > > The remote endpoint is not behind NAT. That's a bug in the openh323 > release shipped with GM 1.2 when using ipv6, it will be fixed when we > release 1.2.1. I am running the standard Debian setup: -> gnomemeeting 1.0.2, -> openh323 1.13.5.4 Do you see any problems with these versions? rdorsch@paddy:~$ dpkg -s gnomemeeting Package: gnomemeeting Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: gnome Installed-Size: 7240 Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo Architecture: i386 Version: 1.0.2-7 Depends: libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.7.2), libaudiofile0 (>= 0.2.3-4), libbonobo2-0 (>= 2.8.0), libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.5.4), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libesd0 (>= 0.2.29-1) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.29-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3), libgconf2-4 (>= 2.8.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.4.7), libgnome2-0 (>= 2.8.0), libgnomecanvas2-0 (>= 2.6.0), libgnomeui-0 (>= 2.8.0), libgnomevfs2-0 (>= 2.8.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.4.4), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libldap2 (>= 2.1.17-1), libopenh323-1.13.2 (>= 1.13.5), liborbit2 (>= 1:2.10.0), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.6.0), libpopt0 (>= 1.7), libpt-1.6.3, libsdl1.2debian (>> 1.2.7+1.2.8), libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxml2 (>= 2.6.11), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), gconf2 (>= 2.6.2-1), libpt-plugins-oss | libpt-plugins-alsa, libpt-plugins-v4l | libpt-plugins-avc | libpt-plugins-dc Recommends: libpt-plugins-alsa, libpt-plugins-v4l, libpt-plugins-avc, libpt-plugins-dc Description: The GnomeMeeting Voice Over IP Suite H.323 compatible videoconferencing and VOIP/IP-Telephony application that allows you to make audio and video calls to remote users with H.323 hardware or software (such as Microsoft Netmeeting). . It supports all modern videoconferencing features, such as registering to an ILS directory, gatekeeper support, making multi-user conference calls using an external MCU, using modern Quicknet telephony cards, and making PC-To-Phone calls. rdorsch@paddy:~$ rdorsch@paddy:~$ dpkg -s libopenh323-1.13.2 Package: libopenh323-1.13.2 Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: libs Installed-Size: 9860 Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team Architecture: i386 Source: openh323 Version: 1.13.5.4-4 > > I'm not sure it triggers the problem as even with that bug, it should > work. > > But I see this : > 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 > Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 set to > EndedByNoAccept I see that only when I activated forwarding on the workstation. When forwarding is not activated, the call is not ended (by the workstation?). What does this exactly mean? Does my laptop end the forwarding request from the workstation? I can call from my laptop the gnomemeeting on the workstation directly. The other way round I cannot try right now, because I am away from my workstation (except you know how to initiate a gnomemeeting call from the command line). > > I do not know your IP addresses, but I see no forwarding being done. Are The IP address of my laptop is not in the gnomemeeting log on the workstation. The picto of gnomemeeting has the green arrow and gconftool reports that forwarding is enabled: rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/always_forward true rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host 119.145.170.31 rdorsch@paddy:~$ > you sure it is enabled? Hmm...that's harder than I expected. But I learn a lot ;-) Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 09:52:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DF03B0796 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:52:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19441-02 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:52:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649303B076C for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:52:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Czycs-0001H9-Gk for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:02 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czycq-0002Jg-Kq for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:00 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:00 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:52:08 -0000 --=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, > I am running the standard Debian setup: > -> gnomemeeting 1.0.2,=20 > -> openh323 1.13.5.4 >=20 > Do you see any problems with these versions? using IPv6: Yes. That's not a flaw of the Debian packaging, but a bug in openh323 that will vanish with the Mimas uploads which aren't yet ready for uploading. the only fix for now is to run without ipv6 or to be called over IPv6. :-P The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDhgQvdkzt4X+wX8RAgIxAJ9Qt9R3GIqAQaHydGyRwd79Jno/eQCeIMjs lNop7X8ffe2DFFbQU766qXI= =2pFL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1-- From jerome@coffeebreaks.org Sat Feb 12 11:22:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0762F3B0B98 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:22:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24176-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:22:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no [62.101.193.41]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C48B3B0AFC for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:22:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from dolcevita.localnet (host-81-191-122-9.bluecom.no [81.191.122.9]) by s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271ED338210 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:22:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dolcevita.localnet) by dolcevita.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D002j-0000Vh-O2 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:22:49 +0100 From: Jerome Lacoste To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CoffeeBreaks Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:22:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1108225369.28263.59.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] SIP interoperability question? GM + VoIP SIP service on same LAN X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:22:55 -0000 Hi, I am about to get a VoIP SIP service at home [1]. Gives me free phone calls from PC to phone all over Europe for a low price. I saw that GM is to support SIP in the close future. I am just wondering what does that mean in terms of interoperability. Could I have conflicts if on the same LAN I have both GnomeMeeting (SIP compatible) and this adapter [2] to which my phone will be connected? Other question: will people with GM be able to call me directly on my phone? (that's probably a question I should keep to my service provider) [1] http://www.telio.no [2] http://www.telio.no/faq/?138 From yochanon@yahoo.com Sat Feb 12 11:44:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C2E3B0B98 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25434-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from web40422.mail.yahoo.com (web40422.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.92.33]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 394E43B0EBF for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 99309 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Feb 2005 16:44:26 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=59TwRLeABLbtX6EmKEvjIBqHtMDx5EHdruqux+NicGbtMv6UWLHPCIa7vzag0vGtNfLvn2xqjlwCkjt/l+FeoHFgP5c8Dw9g6XlfNiFLtlljJc615YUV8raqzCyFiGt0Gi75PDcB/oZmUMQY5k93MOFDqKKYggGwDAoiMLuNEyo= ; Message-ID: <20050212164426.99307.qmail@web40422.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.21.62.150] by web40422.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:44:26 PST Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:44:26 -0800 (PST) From: John Berger Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Trying to build a SuSE 9.2 rpm, but... To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108212974.7324.10.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:44:29 -0000 --- Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi John, > > > rpmbuild -ts gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > we don't ship a *.spec in the tarball. Therefore this won't work. You > need to use the src.rpms for your distro if you need to rebuild binary > rpms. However we don't recommend building from source as there's a > zillion problems around to get rid of for a working GnomeMeeting. Thus > if there is a ready-to-be-installed rpm for your distro, please use it. > > -- > Best regards, > Kilian Aha! I guess that would explain it, heh. Thanks, Kilian. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sat Feb 12 14:00:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884E93B08B5 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:00:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00433-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:00:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1573B08AD for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:00:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from j3c20.j.pppool.de ([85.74.60.32] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D02Uu-0002Gw-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:00:04 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D02Uz-0006BK-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:00:09 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:00:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:00:07 -0000 Hi Kilian, thanks for your quick reply. Am Samstag, 12. Februar 2005 15:52 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi Rainer, > > > I am running the standard Debian setup: > > -> gnomemeeting 1.0.2, > > -> openh323 1.13.5.4 > > > > Do you see any problems with these versions? > > using IPv6: Yes. That's not a flaw of the Debian packaging, but a bug in > openh323 that will vanish with the Mimas uploads which aren't yet ready > for uploading. the only fix for now is to run without ipv6 or to be > called over IPv6. :-P Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem comes up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make sense for you? > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest version is 1.12.2 On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 What version I should watch out for? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 21:27:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5C83B1014 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:27:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20654-02 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:27:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428B13B1009 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:27:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D09UE-0007uJ-89 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:50 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D09UC-0001X9-EN for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:48 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:48 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:27:53 -0000 --=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, > Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem com= es=20 > up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make sense f= or=20 > you? as long as IPv4 notation-compatibility notation in IPv6 is used, there will be problems. Thus if your forwarding is to an ipv4 host, yes. > > > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). >=20 > I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest=20 > version is 1.12.2 >=20 > On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 >=20 > What version I should watch out for? For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these days to get the autobuilder script back online. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDrsjvdkzt4X+wX8RAs0KAJ9m7xweM0AbdTn9EmjJMUkjyNy34ACZAUGd NkZgTfOSP9VvUAUxYJOLnLQ= =oY6l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ-- From xtinab@web.de Sun Feb 13 12:54:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1773B0E23 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:54:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03690-08 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:54:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from fmmailgate04.web.de (fmmailgate04.web.de [217.72.192.242]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1435A3B0932 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:54:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by fmmailgate04.web.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/webde Linux 0.7) with SMTP id j1DHrJ2o016010 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:54:20 +0100 Received: from [80.109.10.151] by freemailng1703.web.de with HTTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:54:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:54:15 +0100 Message-Id: <400064069@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Christina Boeckler" To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Precedence: fm-user Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] dsp0 opened but not readable X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:54:24 -0000 hi i just installed gnomemeeting on my intel-debian box and i get this error, when i use oss - the other option quicknet does not find any devices, alsa is not available, although installed : Cannot use the audio device The selected audio device (/dev/dsp0) was successfully opened but it is impossible to read data from this device. Please check your audio setup. in the faq i read, that another program is blocking my soundcard, but there is no other prog running, as ps shows the rights for /dev/dsp0 are set correctly, as my user is member of the group audio, which has rw rights and normally sound works - xmms at least. any idea, where i can look further ? thanx tina __________________________________________________________ Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min. weltweit telefonieren! http://freephone.web.de/?mc=021201 From jerome@coffeebreaks.org Sun Feb 13 13:05:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615CB3B10E0 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:05:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04311-02 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no [62.101.193.41]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CB33B0E22 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:05:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from dolcevita.localnet (host-81-191-122-9.bluecom.no [81.191.122.9]) by s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3CD338391 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:05:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dolcevita.localnet) by dolcevita.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0O7G-0001Te-Lu for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:05:06 +0100 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dsp0 opened but not readable From: Jerome Lacoste To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <400064069@web.de> References: <400064069@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CoffeeBreaks Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:05:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1108317906.28263.67.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:05:14 -0000 On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 18:54 +0100, Christina Boeckler wrote: > hi > > i just installed gnomemeeting on my intel-debian box and i get this error, when i use oss - the other option quicknet does not find any devices, alsa is not available, although installed : > > Cannot use the audio device > > The selected audio device (/dev/dsp0) was successfully opened but it is impossible to read data from this device. Please check your audio setup. > > in the faq i read, that another program is blocking my soundcard, but there is no other prog running, as ps shows Do you base this last comment on ps output? Have you tried to use fuser? fuser /dev/dsp0 Jerome From kk@verfaction.de Sun Feb 13 14:17:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3CB3B0867 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:17:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07144-05 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:17:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690493B06E6 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D0PFZ-0007Ml-El for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:45 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0PFX-0000yI-GB for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:43 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:43 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <400064069@web.de> References: <400064069@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1108322263.11658.35.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dsp0 opened but not readable X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:17:50 -0000 --=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Christina, > any idea, where i can look further ? if you have setup ALSA without OSS emulation, then try installing libpt-plugins-alsa and use that. If you only have OSS drivers installed it's recommended anyway to upgrade them to ALSA for OSS doesn't do recording and playback at the same time. The only way to make OSS in GnomeMeeting work for most drivers is to use OSS-emulation for ALSA. Jos=E9 Carlos Garc=EDa Sogo reckons that OSS is however mandantory to be th= e primary recommend audio plugin for SARGE ships with OSS drivers as default (even though those drivers for the vast majority won't work with GnomeMeeting). Details on ALSA are in /usr/share/doc/gnomemeeting/README.Debian. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCD6fXvdkzt4X+wX8RAnlLAJ9dvWfX3Q0ItRauYY+NTKmz4Z8p9QCbBhX/ 7+AvUgL0yUId0K3QzyI1n9k= =KOwE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz-- From dsandras@seconix.com Sun Feb 13 14:32:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7E23B1032 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:32:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07873-02 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:32:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAB63B1126 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:31:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (8-98.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.98.8]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67ED1B3FE for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:34:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SIP interoperability question? GM + VoIP SIP service on same LAN From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108225369.28263.59.camel@dolcevita.localnet> References: <1108225369.28263.59.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:31:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1108323103.3182.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:32:12 -0000 Le samedi 12 février 2005 à 17:22 +0100, Jerome Lacoste a écrit : > Hi, I am about to get a VoIP SIP service at home [1]. Gives me free > phone calls from PC to phone all over Europe for a low price. > > I saw that GM is to support SIP in the close future. I am just wondering > what does that mean in terms of interoperability. > > Could I have conflicts if on the same LAN I have both GnomeMeeting (SIP > compatible) and this adapter [2] to which my phone will be connected? > I think not. > > Other question: will people with GM be able to call me directly on my > phone? (that's probably a question I should keep to my service provider) > Yes, it should work, but it depends on your provider. But technically, it is possible. > > [1] http://www.telio.no > [2] http://www.telio.no/faq/?138 > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From ajtim@ctel.net Sun Feb 13 20:12:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EED3B0D82 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26455-10 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from a.smtp.taconic.net (outgoing-1.taconic.net [205.231.144.133]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB89F3B0F62 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:23 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 4254 invoked by uid 0); 14 Feb 2005 01:12:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (216.227.92.50) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 01:12:23 -0000 From: Mitja To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:12:37 -0000 Hi! My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. GM didn't recognize my sound card. I don't have a problem with other applications. Please help me. Thanks, Mitja From 1.41421@gmail.com Mon Feb 14 02:05:34 2005 Return-Path: <1.41421@gmail.com> X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305A93B120D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:05:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08930-07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:05:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923013B120C for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:05:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so573493wra for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I+ZN0X790v37h36IR9z2pwf07PZENXihAtflHvu6JTNWfHYBqP24hqA+mieovYx//nwG0wuZKZv3jikLAQN4r9xwbA0+JN8cBhMu7a9ptd3LlUVjmzGyPnZxTMmzLi6scpKl7ceUdGJLy+6C7yswpDQan6wG68hPPg+qjE06gZY= Received: by 10.54.41.16 with SMTP id o16mr10825wro; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.7.13 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 From: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com>, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:05:34 -0000 I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? Feedback will be much appreciated. From fujimori@ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp Mon Feb 14 02:13:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F493B11C1 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:13:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09263-07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:13:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp [133.9.152.153]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0E93B120D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:12:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (8.12.10/8.11.3) with ESMTP id j1E7CLfN055726; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:12:21 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from fujimori@ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp) Message-Id: <200502140712.j1E7CLfN055726@ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp> To: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com>, GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 PST." Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:12:21 +0900 From: Yoriaki FUJIMORI X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:13:24 -0000 I am interesting in what you would like to do eventually. yoriaki fujimori From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 14 03:26:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C922D3B1228 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:26:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12748-01 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:26:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280F43B0B40 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:26:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0F01B2DB; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:30:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , ajtim@ctel.net In-Reply-To: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:26:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:26:54 -0000 Le dimanche 13 février 2005 à 20:12 -0500, Mitja a écrit : > Hi! > > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. > > GM didn't recognize my sound card. I don't have a problem with other > applications. > Please help me. > Can you be more precise? I don't understand what "didn't recognize my soundcard" means? Also, what audio plugin are you using? > Thanks, > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 14 03:28:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D6B3B1228 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:28:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12886-04 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:28:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BEF3B130A for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:28:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34902C475; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:31:54 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:28:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:28:47 -0000 Le dimanche 13 février 2005 à 23:05 -0800, JCA a écrit : > I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same > LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not > and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it > be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the > gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? > > The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be > done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far > without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the > sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the > opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike > connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? > > Feedback will be much appreciated. ESD and Arts would solve the problem, but the fact is that they are both of very bad quality when it comes to capture/playback at the same time. They are thus unusable with GnomeMeeting. You probably have to use other sound daemons, with low-latency, like MAS or Jack. In that case, you will have to code a plugin for GnomeMeeting supporting the sound daemon of your choice. Hope it helps, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From sime@anticd.org Mon Feb 14 06:26:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAFB3B13BE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:26:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24155-07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:26:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.193]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3D63B138D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:26:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (c211-30-187-243.rivrw1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.187.243]) by mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1EBPv78029049; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:25:58 +1100 Message-ID: <42108AC9.4050307@anticd.org> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:26:01 +1100 From: Simon Males User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> In-Reply-To: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:26:11 -0000 > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. You'll OSS drivers. Guessing but I think libpt-plugins-oss does the trick. -- Simon Males No More AOL CDs Australia - www.anticd.org From ajtim@ctel.net Mon Feb 14 09:13:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC4D3B1343 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02071-10 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from c.smtp.taconic.net (outgoing.taconic.net [205.231.144.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3EB83B1339 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:04 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 16590 invoked by uid 0); 14 Feb 2005 14:13:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (216.227.92.85) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 14:13:03 -0000 From: Mitja To: Damien Sandras Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502140913.12840.ajtim@ctel.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:13:08 -0000 On Monday 14 February 2005 03:26, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le dimanche 13 f=E9vrier 2005 =E0 20:12 -0500, Mitja a =E9crit : > > Hi! > > > > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. > > > > GM didn't recognize my sound card. I don't have a problem with other > > applications. > > Please help me. > > Can you be more precise? I don't understand what "didn't recognize my > soundcard" means? > > Also, what audio plugin are you using? > > > Thanks, GnomeMeeting ''said'' that i don't have a sound card. I have a sound card a= nd=20 works. I use ALSA. From kk@verfaction.de Mon Feb 14 09:16:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0403B1387 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02494-02 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A85A3B13A6 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D0h1C-0002dj-Ji; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:06 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0h1A-0003mo-Or; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:04 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:04 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502140913.12840.ajtim@ctel.net> References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> <200502140913.12840.ajtim@ctel.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1108390564.5525.41.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:16:21 -0000 --=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mitja, > GnomeMeeting ''said'' that i don't have a sound card. I have a sound card= and=20 > works. I use ALSA. and you don't have the pwlib alsa plugin installed. Fix that and it'll work, i.e. install the pwlib-plugins-alsa rpm. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCELKkvdkzt4X+wX8RApDVAJ4oB1XAFHdeaM+vkBGdKoleQX3c6ACfaQUu F2mm1Y4MDs92r23SHYIokT4= =XKrJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z-- From lurch@gmx.li Mon Feb 14 14:06:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822453B118E for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:06:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21919-05 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:06:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7083B07DA for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:05:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IBX0020511YSH@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1EJ5vYM020058 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:57 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 10155 invoked from network); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:05:57 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:05:57 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:49 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live In-reply-to: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502142005.55335.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:06:11 -0000 --nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 02:12 schrieb Mitja: > Hi! > > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. Where did you get the RPMs (GM, pwlib, h323) from? 9.2 does not ship GM 1.2. Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCEPaTb39KPYz+qlMRAjlSAKCh+hH6NCoAgWD0gBpBomCn4qwE8ACeIyoJ SrIwgQutWJtkgs742GcqQx4= =9He3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua-- From 1.41421@gmail.com Mon Feb 14 14:14:41 2005 Return-Path: <1.41421@gmail.com> X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA3B3B140C for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:14:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22356-03 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:14:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724663B0A72 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:14:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so670322wra for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=O/O293+uUj9CPYGjbbrPjRW2YnFj50hmG1gnW8IPaLNkIYa+O84KBXfLXDGQJs1s9dr+KSvK1CbScZZ3E/84yfh9dD7wYrtVaz4j9JceVgaCOSwmo+q6ObLFlK4zvGNQawBoiY8DPfYQgq3R9vZzqawpshFu7EwnN4/1EBgstmM= Received: by 10.54.16.9 with SMTP id 9mr204409wrp; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.7.13 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 From: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> To: Damien Sandras Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting In-Reply-To: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com>, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:14:41 -0000 On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:28:32 +0100, Damien Sandras w= rote: > Le dimanche 13 f=E9vrier 2005 =E0 23:05 -0800, JCA a =E9crit : > > I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same > > LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not > > and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it > > be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the > > gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? > > > > The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be > > done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far > > without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the > > sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the > > opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike > > connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? > > > > Feedback will be much appreciated. >=20 > ESD and Arts would solve the problem, but the fact is that they are both > of very bad quality when it comes to capture/playback at the same time. > They are thus unusable with GnomeMeeting. >=20 > You probably have to use other sound daemons, with low-latency, like MAS > or Jack. In that case, you will have to code a plugin for GnomeMeeting > supporting the sound daemon of your choice. >=20 > Hope it helps, Thanks for your feedback. Well, this is a bit of a bummer, for I do not think I have the necessary expertise to develop the necessary plugin :-( Oh, well. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 14 14:20:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E533B15BC for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:20:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22779-06 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:19:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F7C3B15B4 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (175-84.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.84.175]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73504B5C6; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:23:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:19:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1108408796.3179.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:20:00 -0000 We will probably have a JACK plugin at some point, but I can not tell when exactly :-/ Le lundi 14 février 2005 à 11:14 -0800, JCA a écrit : > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:28:32 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le dimanche 13 février 2005 à 23:05 -0800, JCA a écrit : > > > I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same > > > LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not > > > and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it > > > be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the > > > gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? > > > > > > The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be > > > done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far > > > without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the > > > sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the > > > opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike > > > connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? > > > > > > Feedback will be much appreciated. > > > > ESD and Arts would solve the problem, but the fact is that they are both > > of very bad quality when it comes to capture/playback at the same time. > > They are thus unusable with GnomeMeeting. > > > > You probably have to use other sound daemons, with low-latency, like MAS > > or Jack. In that case, you will have to code a plugin for GnomeMeeting > > supporting the sound daemon of your choice. > > > > Hope it helps, > > Thanks for your feedback. Well, this is a bit of a bummer, for I do > not think I have the necessary expertise to develop the necessary > plugin :-( Oh, well. > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 03:58:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020233B1024 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:58:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07791-05 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:58:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342B73B0FED for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:58:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:28:53 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:28:16 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 08:58:53.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[127DBE10:01C51598] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:58:22 -0000 Hello All, I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 Gateway at my place. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh. From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 18 04:11:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F8C3B1044 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:11:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08868-09 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:11:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D4F3B0FD7 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:11:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCD11B32A for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:15:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:11:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:11:42 -0000 Hello, If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work with GnomeMeeting : a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. Hope it helps, Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hello All, > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > Gateway at my place. > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh. > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 04:51:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDDF3B0957 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:51:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11398-03 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:51:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8563B08B5 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:51:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:21:49 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:21:11 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 09:51:49.0437 (UTC) FILETIME=[773C96D0:01C5159F] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:51:15 -0000 Thanks sir. That was really helpful. =20 Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec only. SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). Also I got to know from your response that there are two service providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to know that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean I want a scenario to be like this:-=20 PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <=3D=3D>My ISP <=3D=3D=3D>Phone(P= OT/PSTN) Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > Hello, >=20 >=20 > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. >=20 > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > with GnomeMeeting : > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. >=20 > Hope it helps, >=20 > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a = =C3=A9crit : > > Hello All, > >=20 > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this.=20 > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > Gateway at my place. > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > > Ashutosh.=20 > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 18 05:05:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B753B0DC4 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12185-06 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08C73B0DB3 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:03:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6448C1B364 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:07:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:03:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:05:10 -0000 Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Thanks sir. > That was really helpful. > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > only. > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to know > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean > I want a scenario to be like this:- > > PC (GM) <===>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <==>My ISP <===>Phone(POT/PSTN) > Here is what you can have : PC (GM) <====> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <==> Your telco provider <====> Phone OR PC (GM) <====> PC-To-Phone provider <====> Phone > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh Sharma. > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. > > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > > with GnomeMeeting : > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > > > Hope it helps, > > > > Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > > Gateway at my place. > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 05:17:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5CC3B0C92 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:17:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13166-09 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36733B0A39 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:48:01 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:47:23 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 10:18:01.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[1FF61280:01C515A3] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:17:28 -0000 Yeah thanks. Definitely h/w is must. I mean I will be mostly going for Quicknet PhoneJack. So this means that I can use the services of My ISP with this GM and h/w. But what I asked about the OpenH323 PSTN Gateway codec support was that correct (if you can throw some light on that) or not? On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a = =C3=A9crit : > > Thanks sir. > > That was really helpful. =20 > > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 code= c > > only. > > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" > > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway > > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all > > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). > >=20 >=20 > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which > you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? >=20 > > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to kno= w > > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if > > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean > > I want a scenario to be like this:-=20 > >=20 > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <=3D=3D>My ISP <=3D=3D=3D>Pho= ne(POT/PSTN) > >=20 >=20 > Here is what you can have : >=20 > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <=3D=3D> Your= telco > provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone >=20 > OR >=20 > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> PC-To-Phone provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone >=20 > > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Hello, > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions= : > > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for examp= le > > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when yo= u > > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. > > >=20 > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able= to > > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are us= ing > > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > > > with GnomeMeeting : > > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > >=20 > > > Hope it helps, > > >=20 > > > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=83=C2=A9vrier 2005 =C3=83 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh = Sharma a =C3=83=C2=A9crit : > > > > Hello All, > > > >=20 > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeet= ing. > > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this.=20 > > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > > > Gateway at my place. > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Ashutosh.=20 > > > >=20 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 18 05:20:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980093B0A39 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:20:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13335-08 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:19:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAAB3B0E96 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B80A874 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:23:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:19:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:20:03 -0000 Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 15:47 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Yeah thanks. > Definitely h/w is must. I mean I will be mostly going for Quicknet > PhoneJack. So this means that I can use the services of My ISP with this > GM and h/w. Is your ISP also offering a normal phone line? > But what I asked about the OpenH323 PSTN Gateway codec support was that > correct (if you can throw some light on that) or not? > Yes it should be. Pay attention to the fact that there is no driver yet for kernel 2.6 for Quicknet cards. A more complicated alternative is to use Asterisk (www.asterisk.org). > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le vendredi 18 février 2005 Ã 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > Thanks sir. > > > That was really helpful. > > > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > > > only. > > > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" > > > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway > > > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all > > > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). > > > > > > > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which > > you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? > > > > > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > > > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to know > > > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if > > > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean > > > I want a scenario to be like this:- > > > > > > PC (GM) <===>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <==>My ISP <===>Phone(POT/PSTN) > > > > > > > Here is what you can have : > > > > PC (GM) <====> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <==> Your telco > > provider <====> Phone > > > > OR > > > > PC (GM) <====> PC-To-Phone provider <====> Phone > > > > > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : > > > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example > > > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you > > > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. > > > > > > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to > > > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > > > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using > > > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > > > > with GnomeMeeting : > > > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > > > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > > > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > > > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > > > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > > > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > > > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > > > > > > > Hope it helps, > > > > > > > > Le vendredi 18 février 2005 Ã 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > > > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. > > > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > > > > Gateway at my place. > > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > Ashutosh. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 06:41:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D679A3B0FAB for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:41:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18024-07 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:41:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5105D3B1058 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:41:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:11:57 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:11:19 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 11:41:57.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA012C90:01C515AE] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:41:23 -0000 Hi, Well that's true. But I think Asterix supports oh323 not OpenH323. I mean will it make any difference if I use OpenH323 + GM + OpenMCU+GnuGK+ Asterix PBX. I saw that whole code is in 'C' only. And its really a complex s/w. I hardly could understand a pin point of things from the help. Anyhow but how can I make call from GM (0.98) to a phone using Asterix. I mean whether I have to register it as application with Asterix. Truly speaking I don't understand that application registration funda. Thanks and Regards, Ashutosh. =20 On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:49, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 15:47 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a = =C3=A9crit : > > Yeah thanks. > > Definitely h/w is must. I mean I will be mostly going for Quicknet > > PhoneJack. So this means that I can use the services of My ISP with thi= s > > GM and h/w. >=20 > Is your ISP also offering a normal phone line? >=20 > > But what I asked about the OpenH323 PSTN Gateway codec support was that > > correct (if you can throw some light on that) or not? > >=20 >=20 > Yes it should be. Pay attention to the fact that there is no driver yet > for kernel 2.6 for Quicknet cards. >=20 > A more complicated alternative is to use Asterisk (www.asterisk.org). >=20 > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=83=C2=A9vrier 2005 =C3=83 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh = Sharma a =C3=83=C2=A9crit : > > > > Thanks sir. > > > > That was really helpful. =20 > > > > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > > > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I lo= oked > > > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 = codec > > > > only. > > > > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabiliti= es" > > > > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gate= way > > > > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose= all > > > > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version= ). > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which > > > you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? > > >=20 > > > > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > > > > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to= know > > > > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because= if > > > > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I = mean > > > > I want a scenario to be like this:-=20 > > > >=20 > > > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <=3D=3D>My ISP <=3D=3D=3D= >Phone(POT/PSTN) > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Here is what you can have : > > >=20 > > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <=3D=3D> = Your telco > > > provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone > > >=20 > > > OR > > >=20 > > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> PC-To-Phone provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone > > >=20 > > > > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solut= ions : > > > > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for e= xample > > > > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than whe= n you > > > > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line= . > > > > >=20 > > > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be = able to > > > > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several count= ries > > > > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you ar= e using > > > > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to = work > > > > > with GnomeMeeting : > > > > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That code= c is > > > > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls usi= ng > > > > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That w= ill > > > > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug= a > > > > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > > > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM= as > > > > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard an= d a > > > > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > > > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Hope it helps, > > > > >=20 > > > > > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=83=C6=92=C3=82=C2=A9vrier 2005 =C3=83=C6=92 = 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a =C3=83=C6=92=C3=82=C2=A9crit : > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through Gnome= Meeting. > > > > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this.=20 > > > > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be havin= g an > > > > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing call= s. > > > > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have Open= H323 > > > > > > Gateway at my place. > > > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > Ashutosh.=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > > >=20 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From devel@tootai.net Fri Feb 18 10:37:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3663B113D for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:37:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00712-06 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:37:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from mango.tootai.net (mango.tootai.net [217.11.129.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F0E3B108A for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:37:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (rob67-1-82-231-69-24.fbx.proxad.net [82.231.69.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by mango.tootai.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id j1IFawqI031817 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:36:59 +0100 Message-ID: <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:42:41 +0100 From: daniel huhardeaux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> In-Reply-To: <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:37:04 -0000 Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : >Hi, > Well that's true. But I think Asterix supports oh323 not OpenH323. I >mean will it make any difference if I use OpenH323 + GM + OpenMCU+GnuGK+ >Asterix PBX. > I saw that whole code is in 'C' only. And its really a complex s/w. I >hardly could understand a pin point of things from the help. > Anyhow but how can I make call from GM (0.98) to a phone using >Asterix. I mean whether I have to register it as application with >Asterix. Truly speaking I don't understand that application registration >funda. > > Asterisk has two h323 channels. I would suggest you to use the oh323 one's. Or you connect your GnuGK gatekeeper to asterisk via the oh323 channel, or you connect GM directly. In this case you will not be able to call to asterisk EndPoints with other h323 Endpoints connected to your GK. -- Daniel Huhardeaux ______ _____ _____ ______ ______ __ enum +48 32 285 5276 /_ _// _ // _ //_ _// __ // / IAX FWD +1 7009 422493 / / / // // // / / / / /_/ // / sip:101 h323:121 @voip./_/ /____//____/ /_/ /_/ /_//_/.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Fri Feb 18 18:23:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBB13B0AD2 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:23:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27081-03 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:23:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875143B0945 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:23:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from j128b.j.pppool.de ([85.74.18.139] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D2HSe-0001Yl-00 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:23:00 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D2HSq-0001GU-00 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:23:12 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:23:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502190023.12048.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:23:05 -0000 Hi Kilian, Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > days to get the autobuilder script back online. testing the debs would be ok for me. I am running an uptodate sarge. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 19 10:03:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3CF3B0789 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06898-10 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:03:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B9C3B0703 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:03:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499] (helo=[IPv6:3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499]) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D2W8z-0002Pe-MX for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:03:41 +0100 From: Kilian Krause To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:03:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1108825419.7144.13.camel@mars> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:03:45 -0000 --=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharma, [snip] > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > only. quoting Craig Southeren PSTNgw is phased out already. At least that was the info i got some days ago. You should thus use something like aefirion, asterisk, yate or isdnh323. Whatever your needs are. YMMV. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCF1VLvdkzt4X+wX8RAiLFAJwKrpe4cHI/j/4Ov66LIwg0ooIOhgCfdqCy w1Sh/YuPjkMFzYY8POHgjMk= =bwZZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv-- From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 19 10:06:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F433B06DD for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07180-03 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:06:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3F53B0703 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:06:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499] (helo=[IPv6:3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499]) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D2WBu-0002Rz-1W for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:06:42 +0100 From: Kilian Krause To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502190023.12048.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> <200502190023.12048.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:06:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1108825601.7144.16.camel@mars> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:06:45 -0000 --=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, Am Samstag, den 19.02.2005, 00:23 +0100 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > Hi Kilian, >=20 > Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously nee= d > > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > > days to get the autobuilder script back online. >=20 > testing the debs would be ok for me. I am running an uptodate sarge. the preliminary debs were built on a SID and will for now not install on SARGE afair. I hope i get the time to build sarge ones tomorrow or so. Will keep you posted as i have some ready (or verified that sarge has the required GNOME package dependencies by now - which it hadn't yet last time i tried) --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCF1YBvdkzt4X+wX8RAvx2AJ9cKjyvIkHMuT1CmVOjMox4yx3fdACfSpYK eYyIZ0AVJC1mXe2Bbro0pDs= =z7De -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J-- From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 21 00:26:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5DA3B0716 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22868-04 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780BA3B07C2 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:57:03 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:56:26 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2005 05:27:03.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9F17130:01C517D5] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:26:29 -0000 Hi Thanks, So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem is to have the s/w packages in C++. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 21:12, daniel huhardeaux wrote: > Ashutosh Sharma a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > >Hi, > > Well that's true. But I think Asterix supports oh323 not OpenH323. I > >mean will it make any difference if I use OpenH323 + GM + OpenMCU+GnuGK+ > >Asterix PBX. > > I saw that whole code is in 'C' only. And its really a complex s/w. I > >hardly could understand a pin point of things from the help. > > Anyhow but how can I make call from GM (0.98) to a phone using > >Asterix. I mean whether I have to register it as application with > >Asterix. Truly speaking I don't understand that application registration > >funda. > > =20 > > > Asterisk has two h323 channels. I would suggest you to use the oh323=20 > one's. Or you connect your GnuGK gatekeeper to asterisk via the oh323=20 > channel, or you connect GM directly. In this case you will not be able=20 > to call to asterisk EndPoints with other h323 Endpoints connected to=20 > your GK. From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 21 00:28:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEEC3B07C7 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:28:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23044-03 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:28:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1D23B075E for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:28:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:58:44 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108825419.7144.13.camel@mars> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108825419.7144.13.camel@mars> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108963687.3994.13.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:58:07 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2005 05:28:44.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[36298CA0:01C517D6] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:28:06 -0000 hi. Thanks, Well do you mean to say that PSTNgw is outdated now. Regards, A. Sharma. On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 20:33, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Sharma, > > [snip] > > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > > only. > > quoting Craig Southeren PSTNgw is phased out already. At least that was > the info i got some days ago. You should thus use something like > aefirion, asterisk, yate or isdnh323. Whatever your needs are. YMMV. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 21 04:01:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25623B1472 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:01:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32342-08 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:01:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBC23B15AE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:01:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9A41B598 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:06:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:01:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:01:38 -0000 Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi Thanks, > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and chan-h323. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 21 04:13:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39EF3B1636 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:13:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00800-10 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:13:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118013B1626 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:43:44 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108977185.3994.31.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:43:05 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2005 09:13:44.0515 (UTC) FILETIME=[A48E6930:01C517F5] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:13:43 -0000 yeah thanks, This means I can use all the features of Asterix for my OpenH323 based conferencing part. So as you mentioned it gives 2 channels. So this means that the programmer is having liberty to choose anyone. Also if I use Asterix or any other MediaG/W, then whether I need to change the source code for GnomeMeeting. I guess no. I have also seen PSTNgw and also read the features of Yate. Well but it doesn't seem that Yate supports quicknet h/w. So I am left with PSTNgw/Asterix only. Isn't this so? But in the previous mails I found that PSTNgw is outdated now. Is it so? Actually confusion gets create when you saw a lot of such projects and some supports the features that you need and some don't. Please guide me in this context. Thanks, Ashutosh Sharma. On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:31, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 21 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a =C3= =A9crit : > > Hi Thanks, > > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > >=20 >=20 > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and > chan-h323. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 21 04:30:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88D53B0C16 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:30:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02087-01 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:30:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1273B0A29 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:30:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041D21B4CA for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:35:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108977185.3994.31.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> <1108977185.3994.31.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:30:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1108978228.3411.32.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:30:30 -0000 Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 14:43 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > yeah thanks, > This means I can use all the features of Asterix for my OpenH323 based > conferencing part. So as you mentioned it gives 2 channels. So this > means that the programmer is having liberty to choose anyone. Also if I > use Asterix or any other MediaG/W, then whether I need to change the > source code for GnomeMeeting. I guess no. > no, gnomemeeting is an H.323 client, it will work with H.323 "servers". > I have also seen PSTNgw and also read the features of Yate. Well but > it doesn't seem that Yate supports quicknet h/w. So I am left with > PSTNgw/Asterix only. Isn't this so? But in the previous mails I found > that PSTNgw is outdated now. Is it so? > I don't know about that, but that's possible. Asterisk can use Quicknet hardware. > Actually confusion gets create when you saw a lot of such projects and > some supports the features that you need and some don't. > > Please guide me in this context. > Thanks, > Ashutosh Sharma. > > On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:31, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > Hi Thanks, > > > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > > > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > > > > > > > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and > > chan-h323. > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be Tue Feb 22 07:12:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70773B070D for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:12:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13878-02 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:12:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from spoolo3.tiscali.be (spoolo3.tiscali.be [62.235.13.169]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3311B3B0688 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:12:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [83.134.222.80] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by spoolo3.tiscali.be with esmtp (Tiscali.be http://www.tiscali.be) id 1D3YuN-00042e-Eg for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:12:55 +0100 Message-ID: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:15:42 +0000 From: Thierry Lepoint User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050221 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:59 -0000 Hello all, I installed GnomeMeeting-1.2.0 (Gentoo) in order to take advantge of the new PC-to-phone system. I obtained a regitration and a PIN numbers from "diamondcard.us". I encoded them in the configuration page of Gnomemeeting. How can I get a call to 32-2-5267356 (my office) in Belgium? My second question is that I have no access to the manual (in Help, "sommaire" is not activated). Many thanks in advance to take these question into account. Thierry -- web site : http://www.first30.org H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 22 07:22:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5933B09F6 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:22:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14371-04 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:22:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8006C3B0A3E for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:22:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5281B2C8 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:26:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> References: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:22:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:22:10 -0000 Hi, Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 14:15 +0000, Thierry Lepoint a écrit : > Hello all, > > I installed GnomeMeeting-1.2.0 (Gentoo) in order to take advantge of the > new PC-to-phone system. > I obtained a regitration and a PIN numbers from "diamondcard.us". I > encoded them in the configuration page of Gnomemeeting. > You need to get them from the GnomeMeeting window, not by direct access, but it seems correct for you. > How can I get a call to 32-2-5267356 (my office) in Belgium? > First thing is to check that your NAT configuration is correct and that you can do calls using GnomeMeeting and not the PC-To-Phone provider. Then, you can go in the preferences, Gatekeeper Settings, Choose "Gatekeeper Host" are registering method, click on Apply. When you see that you are registered in the general history, you are ready to do calls. Just call h323:003225267356 and it will work. When you want to do normal calls (GM to GM), you have to unregister from the gatekeeper. You can do this by going in the Gatekeeper settings, choose "Do not register" as registering method, click on Apply. When you see in the general history that you are unregistered, you are ready to do normal calls. > My second question is that I have no access to the manual (in Help, > "sommaire" is not activated). > That's a bug of the package of your gentoo. > Many thanks in advance to take these question into account. > Notice that 1.2.0 has a bug in the openh323 part, if you load your kernel with ipv6.o being loaded, it is *possible* that you have problems registering to the gatekeeper and doing calls. The fix is to wait for 1.2.1, or to unload ipv6.o from the kernel modules. > Thierry > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be Tue Feb 22 07:53:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175893B1674 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:53:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16321-05 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:52:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from spoolo3.tiscali.be (spoolo3.tiscali.be [62.235.13.169]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A1B3B1760 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:51:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [83.134.222.80] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by spoolo3.tiscali.be with esmtp (Tiscali.be http://www.tiscali.be) id 1D3ZVU-0006oF-Tw for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:51:17 +0100 Message-ID: <421B478B.5000707@tiscali.be> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:54:03 +0000 From: Thierry Lepoint User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050221 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us References: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:53:07 -0000 Damien Sandras wrote: >Hi, > >Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 14:15 +0000, Thierry Lepoint a écrit : > > >>Hello all, >> >>I installed GnomeMeeting-1.2.0 (Gentoo) in order to take advantge of the >>new PC-to-phone system. >>I obtained a regitration and a PIN numbers from "diamondcard.us". I >>encoded them in the configuration page of Gnomemeeting. >> >> >> > >You need to get them from the GnomeMeeting window, not by direct access, >but it seems correct for you. > > That's what I did. I entered GM --> Outils --> PC-to-phone and clicked on the the link entitled 'Create a GM count to PC-to-Phone'. This led me up to https://www.diamond.uss/exec/voip-login?act=sgn&spv=gnomemeeting". So I think it's OK. > > >>How can I get a call to 32-2-5267356 (my office) in Belgium? >> >> >> > >First thing is to check that your NAT configuration is correct and that >you can do calls using GnomeMeeting and not the PC-To-Phone provider. > > If I use the "Edition --> Preferences --> Page 5/10", a click on the button so as to detect NAT led 2 times to a blocking of the GM window. So I went to "Preferences -> General --> NAT. I have: "Activer traduction IP" "Activer vérification d'IP" "adresse NAT: IP_number" Then I went to GATEKEEPER: Host: Gatekeeper ID: not given Host: gk.ast.diamondcard.us Alias: my_count_number Passwd: my_number (both were provided by diamondcard.us) >Then, you can go in the preferences, Gatekeeper Settings, Choose >"Gatekeeper Host" are registering method, click on Apply. When you see >that you are registered in the general history, you are ready to do >calls. > >Just call h323:003225267356 and it will work. > > However I cannot get in touch with somebody: the answer is "Utilisateur non trouvé" >When you want to do normal calls (GM to GM), you have to unregister from >the gatekeeper. You can do this by going in the Gatekeeper settings, >choose "Do not register" as registering method, click on Apply. When you >see in the general history that you are unregistered, you are ready to >do normal calls. > > > OK, many thanks to draw my attention on this. >>My second question is that I have no access to the manual (in Help, >>"sommaire" is not activated). >> >> >> > >That's a bug of the package of your gentoo. > > > I am going to chekc bugzilla. >>Many thanks in advance to take these question into account. >> >> >> > >Notice that 1.2.0 has a bug in the openh323 part, if you load your >kernel with ipv6.o being loaded, it is *possible* that you have problems >registering to the gatekeeper and doing calls. The fix is to wait for >1.2.1, or to unload ipv6.o from the kernel modules. > > For the moment I am still in ipv4. No support enabled in the kernel for ipv6. Thanks for your help. > > >>Thierry >> >> >> -- web site : http://www.first30.org H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 22 08:06:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5665B3B0E26 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:06:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17929-02 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:06:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DFE3B1758 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:04:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DCF1B2DA for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:09:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <421B478B.5000707@tiscali.be> References: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> <421B478B.5000707@tiscali.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:04:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1109077460.4168.36.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:06:25 -0000 Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 14:54 +0000, Thierry Lepoint a écrit : > > > If I use the "Edition --> Preferences --> Page 5/10", a click on the > button so as to detect NAT led 2 times to a blocking of the GM window. Because you clicked several times on the button (known bug). Just click once, and wait, be patient, and you will get the result. > So I went to "Preferences -> General --> NAT. > I have: "Activer traduction IP" > "Activer vérification d'IP" > "adresse NAT: IP_number" And have you forwarded the required ports (if any) ? > Then I went to GATEKEEPER: > Host: Gatekeeper > ID: not given > Host: gk.ast.diamondcard.us > Alias: my_count_number > Passwd: my_number (both were provided by diamondcard.us) > Correct > However I cannot get in touch with somebody: the answer is "Utilisateur > non trouvé" > Does it register correctly with the GK? Are you sure of your NAT setup? That's the first thing to check (unfortunately) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 22 15:15:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD2D3B0752; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11885-10; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6503B06C5; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (30-89.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.89.30]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E241B227; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:20:24 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Sandras To: gnomemeeting-devel-list@gnome.org, gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:15:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1109103335.3441.11.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Newsforge article about GnomeMeeting X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:37 -0000 Hi all, there is a newsforge article about GnomeMeeting here : http://software.newsforge.com/software/05/02/17/1914207.shtml?tid=130&tid=150 -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Tue Feb 22 16:11:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB9B3B06A1 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14638-04 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170E93B0691 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3hJF-0002Zk-WB for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:11 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3hJC-0003hn-9p for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:06 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:06 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9" Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:11:15 -0000 --=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everybody, for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) -K.- -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Von: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo An: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Betreff: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source) Datum: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:47:10 -0500 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:48:46 +0100 Source: gnomemeeting Binary: gnomemeeting Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo Description:=20 gnomemeeting - The GnomeMeeting Voice Over IP Suite Closes: 272898 281215 282789 284437 284740 287234 Changes:=20 gnomemeeting (1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1) unstable; urgency=3Dlow . * New upstream release. Building against Mimas pwlib/openh323 release. + Release targeted to Sid. + Don't show useless dialog. (Closes: #284740) + GM is finished when GNOME session is closed. (Closes: #284437) * debian/control: build-depend on current pwlib/openh323 versions (Closes: #282789, #287234) . gnomemeeting (1.2.0-2) experimental; urgency=3Dlow . * Recompiled with new lipt-1.8.3 package. . gnomemeeting (1.2.0-1) experimental; urgency=3Dlow . * New upstream version. + Fixes problems with Logitec Quickcam (Closes: #281215) * Compiled using Atlas release of pwlib/openh323. * Merging changes made in versions 1.0.2-6 and -7. * Build-Depend on libhowl-dev, for enabling zeroconf support. * debian/watch: updated. * debian/patches: + 05_configure: deleted. Not needed anymore. + 10_relibtoolize: disabled. Upstream runs a up-to-date Sid system. + 99_update_libtool_files: deleted. No longer needed. . gnomemeeting (1.1.3cvs20040929-1) experimental; urgency=3Dlow . * CVS Snapshot. Date: 09-30-2004 + Preparation for 1.2 release + Do not use gconf any longer for storing server list (Closes: #272898) * debian/control: + Depends on new Pandora pwlib/openh323 release. + Added Build-Dependency on evolution-data-server-dev * debian/rules: + Using $(confflags) properly. * debian/patches: + 05_configure: updated to reflect pwlib/openh323 versions we're compiling with. + 10_relibtoolize: disabled, as autogen.sh for this sources has been = run in a Debian environment. Files:=20 c8abe497aeeb90c7d09da2e2a6ed65a9 1797 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.= 2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc 248269910f59870fe188f7c1cae380ab 5518867 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0= +1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz 1ce91266a31635f507a005a549da864c 9185 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.= 2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz a1586a014a75e63defef83f9facf1839 3255460 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0= +1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCGljUS+BYJZB4jhERAkiIAKC28JvP354yPys5PqIKwtx496UM6QCfeyCt QmDHPuQ+RZgj1jaXuPTh8Vg=3D =3DzvFz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.de= b gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.= gz --=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCG5/qvdkzt4X+wX8RAnTHAJ4uc8WaCO75h6aSoXRDr7qY86ECPACfa1ur DSrdw5oodLl3LV+uT+9O5T0= =dYEu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9-- From wouter-gnomemeeting@fort-knox.rave.org Tue Feb 22 19:29:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4523B0822 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:29:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25099-05 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:29:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from amsfep15-int.chello.nl (amsfep15-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.28]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05583B06D7 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:29:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from hibernate.cryolabs.net ([195.162.216.242]) by amsfep15-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with SMTP id <20050223002923.DUYE12698.amsfep15-int.chello.nl@hibernate.cryolabs.net> for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:29:23 +0100 Received: (qmail 20417 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 21:28:40 +0100 Received: from senta.theria.org (192.168.196.7) by hibernate.cryolabs.net with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 21:28:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:29:23 +0100 (CET) From: Wouter Van Hemel To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] In-Reply-To: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> Message-ID: References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:29:47 -0000 On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi everybody, > > for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 > tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting > 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) > Thanks! What does that STUN support through stun.voxgratia.org do exactly? From kk@verfaction.de Tue Feb 22 20:15:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0E83B0D8C for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27318-05 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293CE3B0D8B for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3l7z-0002XL-0Z for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:47 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3l7w-0007su-Sb for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:45 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:44 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1109121344.9615.5.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:15:51 -0000 --=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Wouter, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 01:29 +0100 schrieb Wouter Van Hemel: > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Kilian Krause wrote: >=20 > > Hi everybody, > > > > for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 > > tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting > > 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) > > >=20 > Thanks! What does that STUN support through stun.voxgratia.org do exactly= ? STUN is Simple Traversal of UDP over NAT. That will tell your internal workstation what external IP it shall send its UDP traffic as. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCG9lAvdkzt4X+wX8RAt2DAJ9FLTvNOXoSKTK6KSHK5vUSd13rDACdFMDf 7tAARBQnp2aK0SEirh5MlHk= =85tK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6-- From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Wed Feb 23 03:03:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7135F3B1991 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:03:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13568-07 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3263B077F for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from j3b79.j.pppool.de ([85.74.59.121] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3rUZ-0005rq-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:32 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3rUq-0002Fb-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:48 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502230903.45676.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:03:35 -0000 Kilian, thanks for providing the package. I am going to try it tomorrow. I just noticed that http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnomemeeting.html shows experimental packages 1.2.0. I guess these may be removed. Thanks, Rainer Am Dienstag, 22. Februar 2005 22:11 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi everybody, > > for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 > tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting > 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) > > -K.- > > -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- > Von: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > An: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org > Betreff: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source) > Datum: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:47:10 -0500 > Format: 1.7 > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:48:46 +0100 > Source: gnomemeeting > Binary: gnomemeeting > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > Description: > gnomemeeting - The GnomeMeeting Voice Over IP Suite > Closes: 272898 281215 282789 284437 284740 287234 > Changes: > gnomemeeting (1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1) unstable; urgency=low > . > * New upstream release. Building against Mimas pwlib/openh323 release. > + Release targeted to Sid. > + Don't show useless dialog. (Closes: #284740) > + GM is finished when GNOME session is closed. (Closes: #284437) > * debian/control: build-depend on current pwlib/openh323 versions > (Closes: #282789, #287234) > . > gnomemeeting (1.2.0-2) experimental; urgency=low > . > * Recompiled with new lipt-1.8.3 package. > . > gnomemeeting (1.2.0-1) experimental; urgency=low > . > * New upstream version. > + Fixes problems with Logitec Quickcam (Closes: #281215) > * Compiled using Atlas release of pwlib/openh323. > * Merging changes made in versions 1.0.2-6 and -7. > * Build-Depend on libhowl-dev, for enabling zeroconf support. > * debian/watch: updated. > * debian/patches: > + 05_configure: deleted. Not needed anymore. > + 10_relibtoolize: disabled. Upstream runs a up-to-date Sid system. > + 99_update_libtool_files: deleted. No longer needed. > . > gnomemeeting (1.1.3cvs20040929-1) experimental; urgency=low > . > * CVS Snapshot. Date: 09-30-2004 > + Preparation for 1.2 release > + Do not use gconf any longer for storing server list > (Closes: #272898) > * debian/control: > + Depends on new Pandora pwlib/openh323 release. > + Added Build-Dependency on evolution-data-server-dev > * debian/rules: > + Using $(confflags) properly. > * debian/patches: > + 05_configure: updated to reflect pwlib/openh323 versions we're > compiling with. > + 10_relibtoolize: disabled, as autogen.sh for this sources has been > run in a Debian environment. > Files: > c8abe497aeeb90c7d09da2e2a6ed65a9 1797 gnome optional > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc 248269910f59870fe188f7c1cae380ab > 5518867 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz > 1ce91266a31635f507a005a549da864c 9185 gnome optional > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz > a1586a014a75e63defef83f9facf1839 3255460 gnome optional > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb > > > > Accepted: > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz > to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc > to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb > to > pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz > to > pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 23 05:54:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF673B1A25 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:54:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23711-02 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:54:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582453B1A19 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:54:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3u9k-0005NR-PG for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:12 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3u9i-0002ej-Ai for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:10 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:10 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502230903.45676.rdorsch@web.de> References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> <200502230903.45676.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1109156050.5374.1.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:54:17 -0000 --=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > Kilian, >=20 > thanks for providing the package. I am going to try it tomorrow. >=20 > I just noticed that >=20 > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnomemeeting.html >=20 > shows experimental packages 1.2.0. I guess these may be removed. Yes. The experimental version is automatically superseded and thus removed from the archive when a newer version is in unstable. As you can see at http://ftp-master.debian.org/rene-daily.txt that's queued to the ftpmaster's manual removal. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHGDQvdkzt4X+wX8RAtSnAJ9gTx5gFMN5nxUPUqQhRBFzo77q0ACfQU3G tu6Uwx0RaP2dJ42TVvTOTQI= =XOkr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo-- From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 23 07:08:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47A73B181D for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:08:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28008-05 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:08:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFC23B18A0 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:08:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:39:12 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005022317391212369 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:39:12 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1109160511.3983.36.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:38:31 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2005 12:09:12.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[7CC3B6B0:01C519A0] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem launching GM 1.2.0 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:08:37 -0000 hi, I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. ============================================ Packages:- pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 glib-2.6.2 pango-1.8.0 atk-1.9.0 gtk+-2.6.2 evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 howl-0.9.7-1 gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz And the devel packages also. System:- FEDORA CORE 1 ============================================ Error:- [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): should not be reached aborting... And a dialog box appears which says:- <<<< "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". <<<< Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- <<<<<<<< [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND ................ root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 gnomemeeting root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet .......... <<<<<<<<<< ============================================ My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to the latest GTK version. Please help me in this context. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. From Peter.K.Martin@t-online.de Wed Feb 23 11:53:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EA73B1080 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12397-09 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89223B1084 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd35.aul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D3zlF-0001mq-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:53:17 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.76] (JJJpZgZ1reXYdqfDCu-VTGXCkN6nDceKuHiubR1HFnsYSNfwNBL7cf@[217.244.210.57]) by fwd35.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D3zlD-0Nwd3A0; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:53:15 +0100 From: "Peter K. Martin" To: Damien Sandras User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502141756.26385.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <200502142021.35795.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:53:05 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> X-ID: JJJpZgZ1reXYdqfDCu-VTGXCkN6nDceKuHiubR1HFnsYSNfwNBL7cf X-TOI-MSGID: 7c90e413-5720-492e-9354-c6cab3d1ea13 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Register as Gnomemeeting-User X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:53:21 -0000 --nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie: > Mmmh well, I can not cut and paste the manual here. Basically, you have > to go in preferences, Directory Settings, check that enable registering > is checked. Hi Damien, the first time I followed your advices, I got the content of ILS adressbook= =2E=20 But now I am not able to reach it a second time, although I enabled at=20 Directory Settings registering. One question - I beg your pardon - what is a NAT gateway and what is to be = =20 configured by me? Peter =2D-=20 --nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHLTxhlrz1G3ipzQRAuoXAKCP58vHQjyn63XX6gPYVEdbYQ15iwCfUmFj hg65sueO/KvRciKbwlsPS4E= =1TVD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg-- From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 23 15:57:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DC53B0F23 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25751-01 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201433B15B0 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (121.223-201-80.adsl.skynet.be [80.201.223.121]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420BE116EB; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:52 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Sandras To: "Peter K. Martin" In-Reply-To: <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> References: <200502141756.26385.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <200502142021.35795.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:57:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1109192272.3289.1.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Register as Gnomemeeting-User X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:57:55 -0000 Le mercredi 23 février 2005 à 17:53 +0100, Peter K. Martin a écrit : > Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie: > > Mmmh well, I can not cut and paste the manual here. Basically, you have > > to go in preferences, Directory Settings, check that enable registering > > is checked. > > Hi Damien, > the first time I followed your advices, I got the content of ILS adressbook. > But now I am not able to reach it a second time, although I enabled at > Directory Settings registering. > No idea about this one, if the IP address doesn't change, I don't understand why it doesn't register you, nobody ever reported that. Perhaps you are using special chars in the comment/location/email/firstname/lastname? > One question - I beg your pardon - what is a NAT gateway and what is to be > configured by me? A NAT gateway is when you have a computer or a router sharing your connection for several other computers. You have to configure it accordingly to the FAQ. > > Peter > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 23 16:02:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE04C3B1811 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:02:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26012-07 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:02:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B29A3B0C60 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:02:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D43el-0008Cp-Jm; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:52 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D43ej-0005xS-Ku; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:49 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:49 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109192272.3289.1.camel@golgoth01> References: <200502141756.26385.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <200502142021.35795.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1109192272.3289.1.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1109192569.28536.35.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Register as Gnomemeeting-User X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: "Peter K. Martin" X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:02:57 -0000 --=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 21:57 +0100 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Le mercredi 23 f=E9vrier 2005 =E0 17:53 +0100, Peter K. Martin a =E9crit = : > > Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie: > > > Mmmh well, I can not cut and paste the manual here. Basically, you ha= ve > > > to go in preferences, Directory Settings, check that enable registeri= ng > > > is checked. > >=20 > > Hi Damien, > > the first time I followed your advices, I got the content of ILS adress= book.=20 > > But now I am not able to reach it a second time, although I enabled at=20 > > Directory Settings registering. > >=20 >=20 > No idea about this one, if the IP address doesn't change, I don't > understand why it doesn't register you, nobody ever reported that. >=20 > Perhaps you are using special chars in the > comment/location/email/firstname/lastname? ...actually there's an almost ancient report about '+' not permitted for email addresses. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHO95vdkzt4X+wX8RAsLYAJ9rMiL/Y+ND9o4V0zCl7EUc7lQ5zgCcCDfr /tXSIBvnNrMzh0HACub2R2s= =aZPm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA-- From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Thu Feb 24 15:13:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7792A3B11EB for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:13:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32706-04 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:13:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BFD3B11F4 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:13:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0e54.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.84] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4PMe-0002E0-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:13:36 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4PMy-0003wf-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:13:56 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:13:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:13:41 -0000 Hi Kilian, I installed the new gnomemeeting version 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 from sid. I setup call forwarding rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar ding/forward_host 118.145.140.124 rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar ding/always_forward true rdorsch@paddy:~$ and a gateway is in use: rdorsch@paddy:~$ cat .gconf/apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/gateway/%gconf.xml 118.152.191.172 rdorsch@paddy:~$ Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more promising. It contains: 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may laptop (118.145.140.124). Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? Here is the full debug output of an incoming call: 2005/02/24 21:07:12.464 3:05:57.017 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:2064, if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Started incoming call thread 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Awaiting first PDU 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Receiving PDU: setup 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 RFC2833 Handler created 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Handling PDU: Setup callRef=155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/24 21:07:12.486 3:05:57.039 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 21:07:12.487 3:05:57.040 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.065 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 reason=EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 set to EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.067 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending release complete PDU: callRef=155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending PDU: releaseComplete 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Application not accepting calls 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 reason=EndedByTransportFail 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.070 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Signal channel stopped on first PDU. 2005/02/24 21:07:12.517 3:05:57.070 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 closing: connectionState=NoConnectionActive 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::Close 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:88270c0 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 terminated. 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.117 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 deleted. 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.118 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections Thanks, Rainer Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi Rainer, > > > Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem > > comes up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make > > sense for you? > > as long as IPv4 notation-compatibility notation in IPv6 is used, there > will be problems. Thus if your forwarding is to an ipv4 host, yes. > > > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > > > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). > > > > I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest > > version is 1.12.2 > > > > On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 > > > > What version I should watch out for? > > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > days to get the autobuilder script back online. -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 24 15:27:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED6B3B1C1D for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:27:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01006-06 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:27:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585F33B1C09 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:27:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (44-237.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.237.44]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FC21B66A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:32:50 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:27:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:27:46 -0000 Hi Rainer, Le jeudi 24 février 2005 à 21:13 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hi Kilian, > > I installed the new gnomemeeting version 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 from sid. > > I setup call forwarding > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar > ding/forward_host > 118.145.140.124 > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar > ding/always_forward > true > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > and a gateway is in use: > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > cat .gconf/apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/gateway/%gconf.xml > > > > > > 118.152.191.172 > > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > promising. It contains: > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party > name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it received > via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may laptop > (118.145.140.124). > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, including those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then disable the gateway setting when you forward calls. The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and calling h323:5001 is just the same. > Here is the full debug output of an incoming call: > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.464 3:05:57.017 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP > Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:2064, > if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Started incoming call thread > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Awaiting first PDU > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Receiving PDU: setup > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: H.261-QCIF <10> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: H.261-CIF <11> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/basicString <13> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: H.261-QCIF <10> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: H.261-CIF <11> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/basicString <13> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 RFC2833 > Handler created > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Handling PDU: Setup callRef=155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set > remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set > protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.486 3:05:57.039 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.487 3:05:57.040 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party > name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.065 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 > reason=EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Call > end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 set to EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.067 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending release complete PDU: callRef=155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending PDU: releaseComplete > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H323 Cleaner H323 > Cleaning up connections > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Application not accepting calls > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 > reason=EndedByTransportFail > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.070 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Signal > channel stopped on first PDU. > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.517 3:05:57.070 H323 Cleaner H323 > Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 closing: > connectionState=NoConnectionActive > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H323 > H323Transport::Close > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 > H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:88270c0 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 > Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 terminated. > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.117 H323 Cleaner H323 > Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 deleted. > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.118 H323 Cleaner H323 > Cleaning up connections > > Thanks, > Rainer > > Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > > Hi Rainer, > > > > > Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem > > > comes up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make > > > sense for you? > > > > as long as IPv4 notation-compatibility notation in IPv6 is used, there > > will be problems. Thus if your forwarding is to an ipv4 host, yes. > > > > > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > > > > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). > > > > > > I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest > > > version is 1.12.2 > > > > > > On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 > > > > > > What version I should watch out for? > > > > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need > > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > > days to get the autobuilder script back online. > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Thu Feb 24 16:31:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFC23B1C85 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:31:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05373-01 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:31:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7B53B1286 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:31:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0e54.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.84] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4QaQ-0002N6-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:31:54 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4Qak-0004ZV-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:32:14 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:32:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:31:56 -0000 Hi Damien, Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 21:27 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > > promising. It contains: > > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > > Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it > > received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may > > laptop (118.145.140.124). > > > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go > through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, including > those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then disable the > gateway setting when you forward calls. > > The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing > h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and > calling h323:5001 is just the same. > Ok, that sounds good. Switching forwarding off, does not work either. Maybe I did configure the forward host incorrectly: rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host 118.145.140.124 rdorsch@paddy:~$ What I get is 2005/02/24 22:21:19.299 4:20:03.852 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 22:21:19.300 4:20:03.853 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 22:21:19.308 4:20:03.861 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 reason=EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 set to EndedByNoAccept When I do 5001@118.145.140.124, I get 005/02/24 22:19:07.707 4:17:52.260 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/24 22:19:07.709 4:17:52.262 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 22:19:07.710 4:17:52.263 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 22:19:07.906 4:17:52.459 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 Party name "h323:5001@118.145.140.124" mapped to "5001@ip$118.145.140.124:1720 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2655/157 reason=EndedByNoAccept Nothing arrives at the debug output of the gnomemeeting running on the laptop. Do I need to setup a gatekeeper or can I forward directly to the gnomemeeting on the laptop? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 24 17:12:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830493B116A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:12:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07905-07 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:12:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040FB3B1BD4 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:12:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 44-237.244.81.adsl.skynet.be (44-237.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.237.44]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4091B66A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:17:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:12:29 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:12:32 -0000 Le jeu 24/02/2005 à 22:32, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hi Damien, > > Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 21:27 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > > > promising. It contains: > > > > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > > > Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > > > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > > > > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it > > > received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may > > > laptop (118.145.140.124). > > > > > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > > > > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go > > through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, including > > those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then disable the > > gateway setting when you forward calls. > > > > The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing > > h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and > > calling h323:5001 is just the same. > > > > Ok, that sounds good. Switching forwarding off, does not work either. Maybe I > did configure the forward host incorrectly: > I guess you mean switching "use gateway" off? > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > 118.145.140.124 > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > What I get is > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.299 4:20:03.852 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.300 4:20:03.853 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.308 4:20:03.861 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 reason=EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 Call > end reason for ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 set to EndedByNoAccept > I need the start of the debug output. > > When I do 5001@118.145.140.124, I get > > 005/02/24 22:19:07.707 4:17:52.260 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set > remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set > protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.709 4:17:52.262 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.710 4:17:52.263 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.906 4:17:52.459 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 Party > name "h323:5001@118.145.140.124" mapped to "5001@ip$118.145.140.124:1720 > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2655/157 > reason=EndedByNoAccept > > Nothing arrives at the debug output of the gnomemeeting running on the laptop. > > Do I need to setup a gatekeeper or can I forward directly to the gnomemeeting > on the laptop? > Why are you calling 5001? It was just an example. Is there something connected to 5001? Sorry but I'm a bit puzzled by your tests, what you are trying to achieve and what works and what doesn't. Things seem however simple. You have 2 cases. Imagine that you have machine A and B, and gateway C. If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B through C then you simply put B as forward host, C as gateway, and enable "use gateway", or you use no gateway and use h323:B@C as forward URL, you will do this on A. If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without using C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will do this on A. > Thanks, > Rainer -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Thu Feb 24 17:39:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDC53B12B3 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:39:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09523-08 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:39:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE073B1AE6 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0e54.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.84] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4RdM-0002Uy-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:39:00 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4Rdg-00052U-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:39:20 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:39:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> In-Reply-To: <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:39:04 -0000 Hi Damien, sorry for puzzling you ;-) Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 23:12 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Le jeu 24/02/2005 =E0 22:32, Rainer Dorsch a =E9crit : > > Hi Damien, > > > > Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 21:27 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > > > > promising. It contains: > > > > > > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > > > > Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > > > > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > > > > > > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it > > > > received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead = of > > > > may laptop (118.145.140.124). > > > > > > > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > > > > > > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go > > > through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, > > > including those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then > > > disable the gateway setting when you forward calls. > > > > > > The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing > > > h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and > > > calling h323:5001 is just the same. > > > > Ok, that sounds good. Switching forwarding off, does not work either. > > Maybe I did configure the forward host incorrectly: > > I guess you mean switching "use gateway" off? Correct. > > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > > 118.145.140.124 > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > > > What I get is > > > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.299 4:20:03.852 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > > Sending call proceeding PDU > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.300 4:20:03.853 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > > Sending PDU: callProceeding > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.308 4:20:03.861 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > > Sending PDU: facility > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 > > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2675/159 > > reason=3DEndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H2= 25 > > Answer:8886c48 H323 Call end reason for > > ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2675/159 set to EndedByNoAccept > > I need the start of the debug output. Appended. > > > When I do 5001@118.145.140.124, I get > > > > 005/02/24 22:19:07.707 4:17:52.260 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=3DIdle > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=3DIdle > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 = =20 > > Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 = =20 > > Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.709 4:17:52.262 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > > Sending call proceeding PDU > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.710 4:17:52.263 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > > Sending PDU: callProceeding > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.906 4:17:52.459 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 = =20 > > Party name "h323:5001@118.145.140.124" mapped to > > "5001@ip$118.145.140.124:1720 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 = =20 > > H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending PDU: facility > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 > > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2655/157 > > reason=3DEndedByNoAccept > > > > Nothing arrives at the debug output of the gnomemeeting running on the > > laptop. > > > > Do I need to setup a gatekeeper or can I forward directly to the > > gnomemeeting on the laptop? > > Why are you calling 5001? It was just an example. Is there something > connected to 5001? That was just to understand if gnomemeeting needs an forward target of the= =20 form xxx@yyy. I expected that 5001 was an example, but I would have hoped=20 that I get an rejection from the A (your nomenclature below) > > Sorry but I'm a bit puzzled by your tests, what you are trying to > achieve and what works and what doesn't. I am a VOIP beginner...so not all things I try might make sense. > > Things seem however simple. > > You have 2 cases. Imagine that you have machine A and B, and gateway C. > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B through C > then you simply put B as forward host, C as gateway, and enable "use > gateway", or you use no gateway and use h323:B@C as forward URL, you > will do this on A. That is not what I want to do. > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without using > C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will do > this on A. > That is what I want to achieve. The log (I am surprised that there is no indication at all about the=20 forward_host 118.145.140.124): 2005/02/24 23:27:35.760 5:26:20.313 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP=20 Started connection: host=3D::ffff:118.152.191.172:3201,=20 if=3D118.152.251.114:1720, handle=3D45 2005/02/24 23:27:35.761 5:26:20.314 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Started incoming call thread 2005/02/24 23:27:35.761 5:26:20.314 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Awaiting first PDU 2005/02/24 23:27:35.767 5:26:20.320 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Receiving PDU: setup 2005/02/24 23:27:35.767 5:26:20.320 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=3D164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.767 5:26:20.320 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.768 5:26:20.321 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.768 5:26:20.322 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.769 5:26:20.322 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.769 5:26:20.322 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.769 5:26:20.323 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.770 5:26:20.323 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.771 5:26:20.324 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.771 5:26:20.324 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.772 5:26:20.325 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.772 5:26:20.325 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.772 5:26:20.325 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.773 5:26:20.326 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.773 5:26:20.326 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.773 5:26:20.327 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.774 5:26:20.327 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.775 5:26:20.328 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.776 5:26:20.329 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.777 5:26:20.330 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.777 5:26:20.330 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.777 5:26:20.331 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.778 5:26:20.331 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.778 5:26:20.331 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.779 5:26:20.332 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.780 5:26:20.333 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.780 5:26:20.334 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.781 5:26:20.334 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.781 5:26:20.334 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.782 5:26:20.335 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.782 5:26:20.335 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 RFC2833=20 Handler created 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 =20 Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Handling PDU: Setup callRef=3D164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.784 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 =20 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 =20 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set= =20 remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set= =20 protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/24 23:27:35.786 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 23:27:35.788 5:26:20.341 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 23:27:35.798 5:26:20.351 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 23:27:35.799 5:26:20.352 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 =20 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164=20 reason=3DEndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Cal= l=20 end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 set to EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending release complete PDU: callRef=3D164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.802 5:26:20.355 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending PDU: releaseComplete 2005/02/24 23:27:35.803 5:26:20.356 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Cleaning up connections 2005/02/24 23:27:35.805 5:26:20.358 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 closing:=20 connectionState=3DNoConnectionActive 2005/02/24 23:27:35.806 5:26:20.359 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Application not accepting calls 2005/02/24 23:27:35.806 5:26:20.359 H323 Cleaner H245 =20 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.807 5:26:20.360 H323 Cleaner H245 =20 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.808 5:26:20.361 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 H323Transport::Close 2005/02/24 23:27:35.808 5:26:20.362 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 =20 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164=20 reason=3DEndedByTransportFail 2005/02/24 23:27:35.809 5:26:20.362 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:88f15a8 2005/02/24 23:27:35.810 5:26:20.363 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Sig= nal=20 channel stopped on first PDU. 2005/02/24 23:27:35.820 5:26:20.373 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 terminated. 2005/02/24 23:27:35.868 5:26:20.421 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 deleted. 2005/02/24 23:27:35.868 5:26:20.421 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Cleaning up connections Thanks, Rainer =2D-=20 Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 04:27:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCB23B0B64 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:27:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09793-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:27:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967083B1D6D for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:27:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336311B2B5 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:32:45 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:27:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:27:36 -0000 hi :) > > > > Sorry but I'm a bit puzzled by your tests, what you are trying to > > achieve and what works and what doesn't. > > I am a VOIP beginner...so not all things I try might make sense. > No worries, the setup is not complex. But I'm lost in the explanations. > > > > Things seem however simple. > > > > You have 2 cases. Imagine that you have machine A and B, and gateway C. > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B through C > > then you simply put B as forward host, C as gateway, and enable "use > > gateway", or you use no gateway and use h323:B@C as forward URL, you > > will do this on A. > > That is not what I want to do. > > > > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without using > > C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will do > > this on A. > > > > That is what I want to achieve. > OK, in that case, what you have to do is : - do not use a gateway - put the IP of the destination of the call forward in the call forwarding box (h323:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) - enable call forwarding > The log (I am surprised that there is no indication at all about the > forward_host 118.145.140.124): > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.760 5:26:20.313 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP > Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:3201, > if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 118.152.251.114 is the local address of the GM that is forwarding the call it just received. > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Handling PDU: Setup callRef=164 > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.784 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set > remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set > protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.786 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.788 5:26:20.341 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.798 5:26:20.351 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.799 5:26:20.352 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > reason=EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Call > end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 set to EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 The call is not forwarded, it is rejected. Can you watch what happens in the "General History"? What happens in the GUI when you activate call forwarding, isn't there an error message? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Fri Feb 25 06:50:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EA73B07B1; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:50:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16959-03; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:50:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5E23B1227; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:50:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D4dyy-00066S-8N; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:08 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D4dyu-0008PM-AF; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:04 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:04 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs" Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting development mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:50:21 -0000 --=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everybody, guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the commonly known ones:=20 http://snapshots.seconix.com/ (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/=20 (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. Please use: "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next week. For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's *NO* guarantee with these debs. Enjoy testing. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHxDsvdkzt4X+wX8RAk9EAJwMeALqrgEOVOQcjFDtGx+nvBtRKQCfRLk4 ACSWlVZwMUqBVjCiiO5WFUc= =Ix73 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs-- From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 07:02:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0091B3B0968; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:02:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17634-10; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ED33B07B1; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06446147A2; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:08:02 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting development mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:02:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1109332966.3418.34.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:02:49 -0000 Hi :) Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 12:50 +0100, Kilian Krause a écrit : > Hi everybody, > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > commonly known ones: > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > Please use: > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > Thanks for this! Good job! > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > week. > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > Don't complain either if they uninstall Skype ;) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 07:57:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9104F3B0A08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:57:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20560-06 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C585D3B0817 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:57:50 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 2663 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 12:57:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 12:57:49 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:57:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:57:49 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:57:56 -0000 Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not finished recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the way anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? any comments ?? have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... cheers Selon Kilian Krause : > Hi everybody, > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > commonly known ones: > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > Please use: > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > week. > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > Enjoy testing. > > -- > Best regards, > Kilian > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 08:01:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35473B140E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20836-07 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5B03B1233 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE0511BC4 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:05:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:00:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1109336441.3418.38.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:01:06 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 13:57 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not finished > recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone > cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the way > anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? any > comments ?? > I think it should work, I have no sipphone.com account though. If not, we will fix it ;) > have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... > > cheers > > > Selon Kilian Krause : > > > Hi everybody, > > > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > > commonly known ones: > > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > > Please use: > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > > week. > > > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > > > Enjoy testing. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Kilian > > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 08:05:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C403B1DE1 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:05:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21561-08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:05:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ACB3B1E82 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:02:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008D4C93E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:07:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:02:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:05:25 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 13:57 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not finished > recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone > cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the way > anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? any > comments ?? > Just thinking to that, do they support some "open" codecs or only G.723.1 and G.729a? > have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... > > cheers > > > Selon Kilian Krause : > > > Hi everybody, > > > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > > commonly known ones: > > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > > Please use: > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > > week. > > > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > > > Enjoy testing. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Kilian > > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 08:42:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C89B3B13F8 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23455-02 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B593B13FC for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 3141 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 13:42:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 13:42:24 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:42:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:42:23 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:42:26 -0000 you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP devices against vonage.... A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really ....beta ..... if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) cheers Selon Damien Sandras : > Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 13:57 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > > Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not > finished > > recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone > > cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the > way > > anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? > any > > comments ?? > > > > Just thinking to that, do they support some "open" codecs or only > G.723.1 and G.729a? > > > have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... > > > > cheers > > > > > > Selon Kilian Krause : > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > > > commonly known ones: > > > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > > > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > > > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > > > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > > > > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > > > Please use: > > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > > > > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > > > week. > > > > > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > > > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > > > > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > > > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > > > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > > > > > Enjoy testing. > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Kilian > > > > > > > > -- > _ Damien Sandras > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 08:56:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DC23B13F8 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:56:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24172-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:55:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B673B1E3E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:55:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE48CAC05 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:01:12 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:55:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:56:00 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 14:42 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or > maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited > free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN > .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are > the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP > devices against vonage.... > > A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > > BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really > ....beta ..... I only know kphone, linphone, phonegaim and ... GnomeMeeting. > > if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) > Not sure if FWD-out supports that. > cheers -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From brrhtz@yahoo.de Fri Feb 25 10:28:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56B93B1105 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:28:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29336-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:28:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.33]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22FE23B1082 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:28:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 15:28:54 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:28:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1109345337.6073.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:28:59 -0000 On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 14:55 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > I only know kphone, linphone, phonegaim and ... GnomeMeeting. There's also SJPhone for linux, but it has it's flaws too: * no dial pad (i.e. not dtmf during calls) * some latency, depending on your soundcard (driver) Apart from that, in terms of audio quality etc. it's the best linux sip phone I've encountered so far, and besides GM the only softphone I'd currently recommend. Regards, Bruno. PS: You can run asterisk as a softphone too (chan_oss resp. chan_alsa), latency is very small, audio quality medium but functionality pretty limited. Also, the mentioned chans don't release the sound device between calls, which too limits their usefulness. From lurch@gmx.li Fri Feb 25 10:43:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B7F3B07E0 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30062-05 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0791F3B0010 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0ICH00LH14ZWJN@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:43:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:43:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1PFh7Vj008832 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:43:07 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 12492 invoked from network); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:43:07 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:43:07 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:42:57 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) In-reply-to: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:43:12 -0000 --nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 14:42 schrieb michel memeteau: > you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have > G711 or maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it= s > unlimited free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup > to call PSTN .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open > IPBX as they are the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and > they proned opening SIP devices against vonage.... > > A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > > BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really > ....beta ..... There are good reasons to use G.711: Low complexity - modern, high efficient codecs use a lot of computing power= ,=20 so if you want to do a lots of channels, you have to trade bandwith for low= =20 complexity. Especially Speex needs a lot of cpu power ... High quality - if you are providing a PSTN gateway, you want to have the be= st=20 possible narrowband codec - and G.711 is your choice then. Even the best=20 modern codecs will give a (unnoticeable) worse quality. =46ax transparency - G.711 is the only codec you can transfer Fax over=20 transparently. Low latency - if you dont care about bandwith, G.711 gives you the lowest=20 latency Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCH0eHb39KPYz+qlMRAoD9AKCcvKS7VMWYZ7q7pJtQFfuSGc7dZACghjhW dAZikhiyzHELl9z3jhA4Rrg= =3+pN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav-- From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 10:54:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29823B1099 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:53:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30899-09 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:53:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F3F3B0F41 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:53:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 5074 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 15:53:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 15:53:23 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:53:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1109346803.421f49f31b3bc@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:53:23 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> In-Reply-To: <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:54:01 -0000 Thanks for those precisions , I understand why a SIP registrar would use G711 , I did not now that we could use Fax over G711 but I understand it because it s a lassless codec ( not sure about that ) .. I gave a try to Sjphone , but it s a bit limited I guess .... Can you phone a PSTN with it ?? Another question : is this ISAC codec free as ILBC , did skype change the default codec .... I thought they were using only ILBC at first ..... Quoting Stefan Bruens : > > There are good reasons to use G.711: > Low complexity - modern, high efficient codecs use a lot of computing power, > > so if you want to do a lots of channels, you have to trade bandwith for low > complexity. Especially Speex needs a lot of cpu power ... > High quality - if you are providing a PSTN gateway, you want to have the best > > possible narrowband codec - and G.711 is your choice then. Even the best > modern codecs will give a (unnoticeable) worse quality. > Fax transparency - G.711 is the only codec you can transfer Fax over > transparently. > Low latency - if you dont care about bandwith, G.711 gives you the lowest > latency > > Greetings, > > Stefan > > -- > Stefan Brüns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen > mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ > phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 10:59:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB273B0703 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31315-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C643B141C for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:31 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 5189 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 15:59:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 15:59:30 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:59:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1109347170.421f4b622ec44@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:59:30 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> <1109346803.421f49f31b3bc@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> In-Reply-To: <1109346803.421f49f31b3bc@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:59:35 -0000 OK here s what they say .... dont mention whether it s free ( as in beer ) or not GIPS iSAC GIPS iSAC - a wideband, adaptive codec, designed to deliver high quality sound in both high-bit-rate and low-bit-rate conditions. GIPS iSAC makes VoIP communications possible even using a dial-up modem, automatically adjusting transmission rates to deliver better-than-PSTN voice quality. Quoting michel memeteau : > Thanks for those precisions , I understand why a SIP registrar would use G711 > , > I did not now that we could use Fax over G711 but I understand it because it > s > a lassless codec ( not sure about that ) .. I gave a try to Sjphone , but it > s > a bit limited I guess .... Can you phone a PSTN with it ?? > > Another question : is this ISAC codec free as ILBC , did skype change the > default codec .... I thought they were using only ILBC at first ..... > > Quoting Stefan Bruens : > > > > There are good reasons to use G.711: > > Low complexity - modern, high efficient codecs use a lot of computing > power, > > > > so if you want to do a lots of channels, you have to trade bandwith for low > > > complexity. Especially Speex needs a lot of cpu power ... > > High quality - if you are providing a PSTN gateway, you want to have the > best > > > > possible narrowband codec - and G.711 is your choice then. Even the best > > modern codecs will give a (unnoticeable) worse quality. > > Fax transparency - G.711 is the only codec you can transfer Fax over > > transparently. > > Low latency - if you dont care about bandwith, G.711 gives you the lowest > > latency > > > > Greetings, > > > > Stefan > > > > -- > > Stefan Brüns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen > > mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ > > phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 > > > > > -- > Michel memeteau > 0624808051 > jabber : freechelmi > www.marseille-wireless.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From devel@tootai.net Fri Feb 25 11:00:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340843B1253 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:00:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31381-10 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:00:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mango.tootai.net (mango.tootai.net [217.11.129.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9FC3B1457 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.10.4] (cbk163.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.30.108.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by mango.tootai.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id j1PFxtqI006798 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:59:55 +0100 Message-ID: <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:06:04 +0100 From: daniel huhardeaux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> In-Reply-To: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:00:26 -0000 michel memeteau a écrit : >you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or >maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited >free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN >.... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are >the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP >devices against vonage.... > >A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > >BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really >....beta ..... > > Hmmh, I find it more and more stable. If you don't want to use the linux version, run the windows one with wine, works great, specially with KDE. You also have SjPhone: simple but working. >if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) > > FWD is only g711. Try sipgate or sipphone -- Daniel Huhardeaux ______ _____ _____ ______ ______ __ enum +48 32 285 5276 /_ _// _ // _ //_ _// __ // / IAX FWD +1 7009 422493 / / / // // // / / / / /_/ // / sip:101 h323:121 @voip./_/ /____//____/ /_/ /_/ /_//_/.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Fri Feb 25 15:31:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280AB3B0888 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14084-10 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609123B0834 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0364.j.pppool.de ([85.74.3.100] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4m7m-0005GK-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:31:46 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4m88-0008KE-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:32:08 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:32:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502252132.07907.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:31:53 -0000 Hi Damien, > > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without > > > using C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will > > > do this on A. > > > > That is what I want to achieve. > > OK, in that case, what you have to do is : > - do not use a gateway I did not use the gateway. > - put the IP of the destination of the call forward in the call > forwarding box (h323:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) I missed the h323: so far. Added it now, but still does not work. > - enable call forwarding > > > The log (I am surprised that there is no indication at all about the > > forward_host 118.145.140.124): > > > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.760 5:26:20.313 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP > > Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:3201, > > if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 > > 118.152.251.114 is the local address of the GM that is forwarding the > call it just received. Correct, it should forward it to 118.145.140.124 > > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > > Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Handling PDU: Setup callRef=164 > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.784 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.786 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Sending call proceeding PDU > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.788 5:26:20.341 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Sending PDU: callProceeding > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.798 5:26:20.351 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Sending PDU: facility > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.799 5:26:20.352 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > > reason=EndedByNoAccept > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > > Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 set to > > EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 > > Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > The call is not forwarded, it is rejected. Can you watch what happens in > the "General History"? Is that dumped into a file? I am enabling the forwarding with gconftool-2 via a shell console. > > What happens in the GUI when you activate call forwarding, isn't there > an error message? I did not watch the GUI while enabling since I did that from remote. I did not see a popup error box, when I returned to the workstation, running the gnomemeeting forwarding the call. When starting up gnomemeeting 1.2.1 I sometimes see [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 This is with forwarding disabled and happens only sometimes. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From carlosh@linuxservices.co.nz Fri Feb 25 17:40:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1D53B0C42 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19795-08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from linda-1.paradise.net.nz (bm-1a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A1A3B0BED for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (smtp-2a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.195]) by linda-1.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0ICH0082ROBZN7@linda-1.paradise.net.nz> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:40:47 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.0.18] (203-96-159-89.paradise.net.nz [203.96.159.89]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ACA9E2B6 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:40:47 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:39:27 +1300 From: Carlos Hernandez Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) In-reply-to: <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <421FA91F.90008@linuxservices.co.nz> Organization: LINUX Services Ltd. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:40:53 -0000 Hello all: I am new to this list. I had a nice surprise to know yesterday, of the new features for gm, SIP! I've been trying installing all those soft phones mentioned on Linux (except the ones with wine) and really there's nothing I've liked. Is there anything I could help with to speed up the testing? iLBC is the codec of my preference since it works great on slow connections. Cheers, Carlos == daniel huhardeaux wrote: > michel memeteau a écrit : > >> you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only >> have G711 or >> maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s >> unlimited >> free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to >> call PSTN >> .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as >> they are >> the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned >> opening SIP >> devices against vonage.... >> >> A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... >> >> BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is >> really >> ....beta ..... >> >> > Hmmh, I find it more and more stable. If you don't want to use the > linux version, run the windows one with wine, works great, specially > with KDE. You also have SjPhone: simple but working. > >> if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) >> > FWD is only g711. Try sipgate or sipphone > From ian.firla@gmail.com Sat Feb 26 04:08:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079E53B099B for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:08:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10135-06 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:08:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8226A3B0A37 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:08:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so533001wri for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:08:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AFRN1+nVTkgXsajvyCJjOV0InxX47YoU4obU9YXh6FmIW35xu5qWMJ/WX2NGaXgRIN233J/FFyfay0LF++fcR/BnRIFbtxu4WD6ODLy3rIxqs3MSm60brtJsWIp1MXdX6jFbzcxsvsQhjNQkA8GqqeXCCQLKkdDIRff6HtS3C5A= Received: by 10.54.47.62 with SMTP id u62mr45074wru; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:08:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.14.25 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:08:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:08:17 +0100 From: Ian Firla To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ian Firla , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:08:45 -0000 Hello All, I've read through the archives on this error as well as on the make of my webcam and I haven't yet seen a solution for the problem that works for me so I'm trying again. OS: Ubuntu Debian/GNU Linux (tracking hoary aka unstable) Kernel: 2.6.10-4-amd64-generic Webcam: Logitech QuickCam Pro 3000 USB webcam Gnomemeeting version: 1.2.0 (used the Ubuntu deb package) Like others who have posted to the list, I have no problems using the webcam with other applications. Its built-in microphone works with Gnomemeeting. I get the famous "Error while opening video device /dev/video0" message when running gnomemeeting as a regular user and as root. I've noted that when starting up gnomeeting from the commandline, I see the following error message: kubla@ogmios:~ $ gnomemeeting & [1] 15104 kubla@ogmios:~ $ [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 The device has correct ownership and my user is a member of the video group: crw-rw---- 1 root video 81, 0 2005-02-26 09:33 /dev/video0 The relevant output from my syslog looks like this: Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 4 Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost kernel: Linux video capture interface: v1.00 Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost kernel: pwc Philips webcam module version 10.0.6-unofficial loaded. Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14040]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules' at line 49 applied, 'controlC2' becomes 'snd/%k' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14040]: creating device node '/dev/snd/controlC2'Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost usb.agent[13762]: snd-usb-audio: loaded successfully Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14144]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules' at line 51 applied, 'pcmC2D0c' becomes 'snd/%k' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14144]: creating device node '/dev/snd/pcmC2D0c' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14143]: creating device node '/dev/video0' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14128]: creating device node '/dev/dsp2' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14130]: creating device node '/dev/audio2' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14132]: creating device node '/dev/mixer2' Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Supports Philips PCA645/646, PCVC675/680/690, PCVC720[40]/730/740/750 & PCVC830/840. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Also supports the Askey VC010, various Logitech Quickcams, Samsung MPC-C10 and MPC-C30, Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc the Creative WebCam 5 & Pro Ex, SOTEC Afina Eye and Visionite VCS-UC300 and VCS-UM100. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Trace options: 0x00a1 Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Logitech QuickCam Pro 3000 USB webcam detected. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Registered as /dev/video0. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: usbcore: registered new driver Philips webcam Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: usbcore: registered new driver snd-usb-audio Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc Failed to set LED on/off time. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc set_video_mode(176x144 @ 10, palette 15). Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc decode_size = 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc Using alternate setting 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc set_video_mode(160x120 @ 10, palette 15). Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc decode_size = 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc Using alternate setting 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc set_video_mode(160x120 @ 10, palette 15). Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc decode_size = 1. Any ideas or suggestions? Many thanks in advance, Ian From lurch@gmx.li Sat Feb 26 06:49:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80A23B09BB for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:49:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16738-04 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:48:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352013B0982 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:48:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0ICI00A2VOTMTA@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1QBmvos008973 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:57 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 32296 invoked from network); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:48:57 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:48:57 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:54 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 In-reply-to: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> To: Ian Firla , GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:49:03 -0000 --nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Samstag, 26. Februar 2005 10:08 schrieb Ian Firla: Try opening it with small size and with large size (Preferences->Video=20 Devices) Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCIGInb39KPYz+qlMRAuiLAKCnNun70HN4mw8HR7SEP3bYRQFoGACfSzon eBaLhloft+P8ph8rfCWyzcs= =Rb6n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh-- From ian.firla@gmail.com Sat Feb 26 07:22:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A943B0982 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:22:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18166-01 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:22:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0800D3B0747 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:22:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so544174wri for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=FzzPePdGfZSQvPgTg9MUgfyVg9/T5kR8hKg3qNQhob9KIEFtnQ+XQa4hlsabGwappH9v7SPJeVn+vpI8taXz7u4E+M0tBSGEXYfL3PU40UmoRLP7LU8OcVDcb0yGk7/B076ElZCQ0Fbxxk7OMY2tjomEswp1IcGcFop31WUD/W8= Received: by 10.54.43.77 with SMTP id q77mr13664wrq; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.14.25 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:22:54 +0100 From: Ian Firla To: lurch@gmx.li Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 In-Reply-To: <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ian Firla , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:22:57 -0000 I tried that already. I also tried changing formats from ntsc to pal to secam, etc. Thanks anyway! Ian On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:54 +0100, Stefan Bruens wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Februar 2005 10:08 schrieb Ian Firla: >=20 > Try opening it with small size and with large size (Preferences->Video > Devices) >=20 > Greetings, >=20 > Stefan >=20 > -- > Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen > mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ > phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 >=20 >=20 > From asharma@samyak.com Sat Feb 26 08:49:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B428D3B08DE for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22724-04 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABED03B0979 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:20:33 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005022619203220998 ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:20:32 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:19:37 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2005 13:50:33.0187 (UTC) FILETIME=[24296330:01C51C0A] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: OpenH323 Mailing List Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:49:46 -0000 hello All, I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. ============================================ Packages:- pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 glib-2.6.2 pango-1.8.0 atk-1.9.0 gtk+-2.6.2 evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 howl-0.9.7-1 gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz And the devel packages also. System:- FEDORA CORE 1 ============================================ Error:- [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): should not be reached aborting... And a dialog box appears which says:- <<<< "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". <<<< Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- <<<<<<<< [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND ................ root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 gnomemeeting root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet .......... <<<<<<<<<< ============================================ My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to the latest GTK version. Please help me in this context. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. From conrad_b@yahoo.com Sat Feb 26 20:12:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B733B06D5 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:12:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18504-01 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:12:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from web41508.mail.yahoo.com (web41508.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.91]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7090E3B0670 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:12:39 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 53282 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Feb 2005 01:12:38 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=ntYcgrVkYBIKEM0yE7Pj9RTGnWsqG5jvc5rZ0+pULjOHX1SQE8wRayNNdHM6uEeEnGud6H1+mlAwccE04nq5JrKlNk70LNXLgTIJWLKRfe8rEUjldSBn5lH/MeSsdWcUA1dCdIqXIyFfgOurrumI/ulO5e6J6LFby5xj5tFdc7Y= ; Message-ID: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.227.18.13] by web41508.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:12:38 CET Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:12:38 +0100 (CET) From: Conrad Beckert To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:12:41 -0000 Hi, sorry for asking a question that might have been asked before. I run SUSE 9.1 and thuse have automake 1.8.2 installed. The autogen.sh script complains: checking for autoconf >= 2.53... testing autoconf2.50... not found. testing autoconf... found 2.59 checking for automake >= 1.7... testing automake-1.7... not found. ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 installed to build gnomemeeting. Download the appropriate package for from your distribution or get the source tarball at http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/automake/automake-1.7.tar.gz checking for libtool >= 1.4.3... testing libtoolize... found 1.5.2 checking for glib-gettext >= 2.2.0... testing glib-gettextize... found 2.2.3 checking for intltool >= 0.25... testing intltoolize... found 0.30 checking for pkg-config >= 0.14.0... testing pkg-config... found 0.15.0 ./autogen.sh: line 1: --print-ac-dir: command not found Checking for required M4 macros... libtool.m4 not found glib-gettext.m4 not found intltool.m4 not found pkg.m4 not found Checking for forbidden M4 macros... ***Error***: some autoconf macros required to build gnomemeeting were not found in your aclocal path, or some forbidden macros were found. Perhaps you need to adjust your ACLOCAL_PATH? automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.8.3 Written by Tom Tromey . What's wrong? Conrad ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de From jan.schampera@web.de Sat Feb 26 20:24:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915ED3B076C for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18839-07 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546113B0670 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd11.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5DAj-0006qv-01; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:37 +0100 Received: from router.home.thebonsai.de (SrjQV-ZE8e0c-Wl6W0YaDEN4nMvADK20Xciuu+u15IpTX0lTwsMysY@[217.224.196.243]) by fmrl11.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D5DAh-1vLE000; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 Received: from mainserver.home.thebonsai.de (mainserver.home.thebonsai.de [192.168.64.3]) by router.home.thebonsai.de (8.12.6/TheBonsai) with SMTP id j1R1Oa1N011520 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:36 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 From: Jan Schampera To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS Message-ID: <20050227022435.5d21e94f@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> In-Reply-To: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: SrjQV-ZE8e0c-Wl6W0YaDEN4nMvADK20Xciuu+u15IpTX0lTwsMysY@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: af9b578d-4205-4925-9c14-2acf2e7a4f70 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:24:40 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:12:38 +0100 (CET) Conrad Beckert wrote: > checking for automake >= 1.7... > testing automake-1.7... not found. > ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 installed Which is your autoconf version? J. -- "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." - J. B. Postel, master of the net. From jan.schampera@web.de Sat Feb 26 21:00:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6A93B070A for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:00:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19986-07 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:00:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.83]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62A93B06D5 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:00:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5DjJ-0004Cj-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:21 +0100 Received: from router.home.thebonsai.de (GvancQZBoeE3MVipGQ-TbeUFndADWNsNfVKg5jy+oxzYu5+LelrS8f@[217.224.196.243]) by fmrl09.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D5Dj8-0go83M0; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:10 +0100 Received: from mainserver.home.thebonsai.de (mainserver.home.thebonsai.de [192.168.64.3]) by router.home.thebonsai.de (8.12.6/TheBonsai) with SMTP id j1R20B1N012120 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:09 +0100 From: Jan Schampera To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS Message-ID: <20050227030009.7f750279@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> In-Reply-To: <20050227022435.5d21e94f@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> References: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> <20050227022435.5d21e94f@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> Organization: private X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: GvancQZBoeE3MVipGQ-TbeUFndADWNsNfVKg5jy+oxzYu5+LelrS8f@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: b843488e-7b19-4fe5-8248-b35a4be83148 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:00:23 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 Jan Schampera wrote: > > checking for automake >= 1.7... > > testing automake-1.7... not found. > > ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 installed > Which is your autoconf version? Automake of course :) J. -- "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." - J. B. Postel, master of the net. From conrad_b@yahoo.com Sun Feb 27 06:28:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBB63B091B for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:28:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10913-06 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:28:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from web41507.mail.yahoo.com (web41507.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.90]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C52C3B07BE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:28:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 66407 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Feb 2005 11:28:41 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=UZBLT2+2hzLhNnNPnAbPEQUb+q9nYVVLxYeHMshr0L7YJnI7H60dvhyNHpn1uDrwRGn/1/5MuQaLceRjukKqSKYgCYWcMS2+kCm3ShHTFAVHeGZET5UIEPzmScDflrMJdkPbuCcf/ebU3N8jtQUdjPLmchcyoZEUX4CAVbDRU/A= ; Message-ID: <20050227112841.66405.qmail@web41507.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.227.18.13] by web41507.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:41 CET Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:41 +0100 (CET) From: Conrad Beckert Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050227030009.7f750279@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:28:45 -0000 --- Jan Schampera schrieb: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 > Jan Schampera wrote: > > > > > checking for automake >= 1.7... > > > testing automake-1.7... not found. > > > ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 > installed > > Which is your autoconf version? > Automake of course :) > automake 1.8.3 - the one that comes with SuSE 9.1 autoconf 2.59 - dito Conrad ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de From jan.schampera@web.de Sun Feb 27 11:22:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17D53B0669 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:22:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25090-02 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:22:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA603B066D for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:22:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5RBL-0000bu-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:11 +0100 Received: from router.home.thebonsai.de (S+6eoaZOYemMXSS8M1j0f8RdjQdRucJuzTGgnkvoRcxcOIaQ8+pMEk@[217.95.206.205]) by fmrl09.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D5RBI-1xMtLk0; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:08 +0100 Received: from mainserver.home.thebonsai.de (mainserver.home.thebonsai.de [192.168.64.3]) by router.home.thebonsai.de (8.12.6/TheBonsai) with SMTP id j1RGM81N032111 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:08 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:07 +0100 From: Jan Schampera To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS Message-ID: <20050227172207.452b4df7@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> In-Reply-To: <20050227112841.66405.qmail@web41507.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050227030009.7f750279@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> <20050227112841.66405.qmail@web41507.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: S+6eoaZOYemMXSS8M1j0f8RdjQdRucJuzTGgnkvoRcxcOIaQ8+pMEk@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: 80cb79a5-7cc9-4a8b-9102-2ddd8a8104b2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:22:18 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:41 +0100 (CET) Conrad Beckert wrote: > > Automake of course :) > automake 1.8.3 - the one that comes with SuSE 9.1 > autoconf 2.59 - dito I had a simelar problem. Automake 1.6 and Automake 1.9 installed. The ./autogen.sh told me the same. I tracked it down to my Automake M4-Makro that tests that: it only knew up to 1.7. So I changed autogen.sh to look for minimum AM 1.6. Then it found my 1.6.3 package. Maybe you could do simelar. Again, the problem are the auto*.m4 macros. J. -- "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." - J. B. Postel, master of the net. From jonny.strom@netikka.fi Mon Feb 28 03:15:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93E63B08D7 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04573-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:15:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.linuxvaasa.com (av8.netikka.fi [213.250.83.8]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3453B081A for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:15:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [213.250.83.8] (mail.linuxvaasa.com [213.250.83.8]) by mail.linuxvaasa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF3F111362 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:15:33 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4222D325.7010204@netikka.fi> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:15:33 +0200 From: Johnny Strom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; sv-SE; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:15:37 -0000 Damien Sandras wrote: > Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 14:42 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > >>you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or >>maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited >>free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN >>.... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are >>the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP >>devices against vonage.... >> >>A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... >> >>BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really >>....beta ..... > > > I only know kphone, linphone, phonegaim and ... GnomeMeeting. > There is mythphone as well but you need mythtv it is not intended for standard desktop use. > >>if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) >> > > > Not sure if FWD-out supports that. > > >>cheers > > From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:27:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6033B09BF for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:27:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09250-06 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:27:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C203B095E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:27:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8F418F7E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:33:08 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <421FA91F.90008@linuxservices.co.nz> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> <421FA91F.90008@linuxservices.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:27:22 +0100 Message-Id: <1109582842.3614.18.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:27:26 -0000 Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 11:39 +1300, Carlos Hernandez a écrit : > Hello all: > I am new to this list. I had a nice surprise to know yesterday, of the > new features for gm, SIP! > I've been trying installing all those soft phones mentioned on Linux > (except the ones with wine) and really there's nothing I've liked. > Is there anything I could help with to speed up the testing? > > iLBC is the codec of my preference since it works great on slow > connections. > In a few days we will have binaries available again, for easy installation. I will announce it here, and announce what works and what's broken. In all cases it will be parallel installable with GnomeMeeting 1.2, so that you can use both. > Cheers, > Carlos > > == > > daniel huhardeaux wrote: > > > michel memeteau a écrit : > > > >> you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only > >> have G711 or > >> maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s > >> unlimited > >> free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to > >> call PSTN > >> .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as > >> they are > >> the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned > >> opening SIP > >> devices against vonage.... > >> > >> A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > >> > >> BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is > >> really > >> ....beta ..... > >> > >> > > Hmmh, I find it more and more stable. If you don't want to use the > > linux version, run the windows one with wine, works great, specially > > with KDE. You also have SjPhone: simple but working. > > > >> if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) > >> > > FWD is only g711. Try sipgate or sipphone > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:29:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5F63B09B5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:29:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09488-05 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:29:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F98C3B07F5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:29:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108A61B67D; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:35:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , Ian Firla In-Reply-To: <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:29:37 +0100 Message-Id: <1109582977.3614.20.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: lurch@gmx.li X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:29:50 -0000 Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 13:22 +0100, Ian Firla a écrit : > I tried that already. > > I also tried changing formats from ntsc to pal to secam, etc. > > Thanks anyway! I have not tried GnomeMeeting yet with a recent kernel, but I know there was a bug in the driver. Can you try loading pwcx ? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:31:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09793B09B5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:31:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09688-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:31:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2393B09C6 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:31:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933B018F7E; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:37:00 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> References: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:31:15 +0100 Message-Id: <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: OpenH323 Mailing List X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:31:22 -0000 Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 19:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > hello All, > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > ============================================ > Packages:- > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > glib-2.6.2 > pango-1.8.0 > atk-1.9.0 > gtk+-2.6.2 > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > howl-0.9.7-1 > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > And the devel packages also. > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > ============================================ > Error:- > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > That can be safely ignored. > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): > should not be reached > aborting... > You need to upgrade liborbit/bonobo-activation-server. I wonder why it is not a dependancy. > And a dialog box appears which says:- > <<<< > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". > <<<< > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > <<<<<<<< > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > ................ > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > gnomemeeting > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > .......... > <<<<<<<<<< > ============================================ > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > the latest GTK version. > > Please help me in this context. > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:34:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5849D3B0A0E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:34:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09859-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0090A3B09ED for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:34:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D4B1B670 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:39:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502252132.07907.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> <200502252132.07907.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:34:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1109583242.3614.25.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:34:11 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 21:32 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > > Is that dumped into a file? I am enabling the forwarding with gconftool-2 via > a shell console. > Unfortunately not... Can't you do a ssh -X to export the display and see in real time what's happening? My guess is that the call forwarding is not activated for some obscure reason. (It could even be a bug). > > > > What happens in the GUI when you activate call forwarding, isn't there > > an error message? > > I did not watch the GUI while enabling since I did that from remote. I did not > see a popup error box, when I returned to the workstation, running the > gnomemeeting forwarding the call. > > When starting up gnomemeeting 1.2.1 I sometimes see > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > This is with forwarding disabled and happens only sometimes. > That's a warning from libhowl, it can be safely ignored. The ideal is to check the general history, I will try call forwarding again tonight at home to make sure it is not broken. Perhaps another GM 1.2 user can try too and report back? > Thanks, > Rainer > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 28 04:58:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA403B0881 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:58:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11140-03 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5121A3B087F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:58:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:29:34 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005022815293330238 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:29:34 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> References: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1109584728.3980.48.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:28:48 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2005 09:59:34.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[34C568B0:01C51D7C] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:58:51 -0000 Hi , Well thanks for the help. But I was able to make that Socket problem resolved by starting the mDNSResponder. But regarding the second one as you suggested about the liborbit and libbonobo, I had installed these prior to installing GM1.2.0 =20 Sorry I forgot to mention about all the packages. THese packages were:- ORBit2-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 ORBit2-devel-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 libbonobo-2.4.3 libbonoboui-2.4.3 Thanks and regards, Ashutosh On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 15:01, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le samedi 26 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 19:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a =C3= =A9crit : > > hello All, > >=20 > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Packages:-=20 > > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > > glib-2.6.2 > > pango-1.8.0 > > atk-1.9.0 > > gtk+-2.6.2 > > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > > howl-0.9.7-1 > >=20 > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > >=20 > > And the devel packages also. > >=20 > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Error:- > >=20 > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > >=20 >=20 > That can be safely ignored. >=20 >=20 >=20 > >=20 > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv):=20 > > should not be reached > > aborting... > >=20 >=20 > You need to upgrade liborbit/bonobo-activation-server. I wonder why it > is not a dependancy. >=20 >=20 > > And a dialog box appears which says:- > > <<<< > > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)".=20 > > <<<< > >=20 > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > > <<<<<<<< > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > >=20 > > ................ > > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > > gnomemeeting > > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00=20 > > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > > .......... > > <<<<<<<<<< > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >=20 > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > > the latest GTK version. > > =20 > > Please help me in this context. > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > > Ashutosh Sharma. > >=20 > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 05:06:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A173B08D6 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11701-05 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:06:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76B33B09FB for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:05:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E73BDF9 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:11:44 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109584728.3980.48.camel@sipl25> References: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> <1109584728.3980.48.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:05:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1109585159.3614.55.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:06:46 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 15:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi , > > Well thanks for the help. But I was able to make that Socket problem > resolved by starting the mDNSResponder. > Indeed, that is what I consider as a bug in the library. It should silently fail. > But regarding the second one as you suggested about the liborbit and > libbonobo, I had installed these prior to installing GM1.2.0 > > Sorry I forgot to mention about all the packages. > THese packages were:- > > ORBit2-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 > ORBit2-devel-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 > libbonobo-2.4.3 > libbonoboui-2.4.3 > I will let Johnny comment on this, he is our fedora guy :) > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh > > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 15:01, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 19:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > hello All, > > > > > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > > > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > > > ============================================ > > > Packages:- > > > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > > > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > > > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > > > glib-2.6.2 > > > pango-1.8.0 > > > atk-1.9.0 > > > gtk+-2.6.2 > > > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > > > howl-0.9.7-1 > > > > > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > > > > > And the devel packages also. > > > > > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > > > ============================================ > > > Error:- > > > > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > > > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > > > > > > That can be safely ignored. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > > > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): > > > should not be reached > > > aborting... > > > > > > > You need to upgrade liborbit/bonobo-activation-server. I wonder why it > > is not a dependancy. > > > > > > > And a dialog box appears which says:- > > > <<<< > > > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > > > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". > > > <<<< > > > > > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > > > <<<<<<<< > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > > > > > ................ > > > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > > > gnomemeeting > > > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 > > > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > > > .......... > > > <<<<<<<<<< > > > ============================================ > > > > > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > > > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > > > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > > > the latest GTK version. > > > > > > Please help me in this context. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From james.ellis@gmail.com Mon Feb 28 05:37:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BB23B0980 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:37:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13319-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:37:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01953B07F5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:37:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so210627rne for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ujp9KXbUrwTT3Lu9eKYc0ih5hh1smDhn+44/HrMD612wELFwQ0CxAVi49zWQCtZS1jSm1HDJPcZM1v2FfGJs1aWXEG9saDgchBGJ+BEwOxzTjtLElMLYAkOVCQV4+oNADx38X77l3hAUjeRHpXj75BkSI58NgMAcAneHHe9A1ns= Received: by 10.38.12.21 with SMTP id 21mr101126rnl; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.86.19 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:37:17 +0000 From: James Ellis To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] gm and dlink router with NAT X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: James Ellis , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:37:19 -0000 Hi This is my first post here.... I'm trying to set up gnomemeeting (1.02) on my FC3 box, this has gone ok and the program has picked up my Cam - a PWC 840 - and Microphone ok. I believe the firewall on my dlink router (724) is cauing some problems.. does anyone have any knowledge of how to transpose the port information available in the gm website FAQ to the dlink configuration (I've tried and failed) ? Dlink suggest that the box be placed in the "DMZ" - outside the firewall but I don't think that is a suitable answer. Thanks and cheers James From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 05:43:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CD53B09FA for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:43:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13607-08 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:43:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735793B0A2F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:43:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D242116EB; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:48:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] gm and dlink router with NAT From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , James Ellis In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:43:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1109587387.3614.67.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:43:14 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 10:37 +0000, James Ellis a écrit : > Hi > > This is my first post here.... > > I'm trying to set up gnomemeeting (1.02) on my FC3 box, this has gone > ok and the program has picked up my Cam - a PWC 840 - and Microphone > ok. > I believe the firewall on my dlink router (724) is cauing some > problems.. does anyone have any knowledge of how to transpose the port > information available in the gm website FAQ to the dlink configuration > (I've tried and failed) ? > > Dlink suggest that the box be placed in the "DMZ" - outside the > firewall but I don't think that is a suitable answer. The easiest is to use GM 1.2. I think (but I'm not sure) that DLink routers are not of the type "Symmetric NAT". In short words, that means that you do not have to forward any port as long as you are using STUN support in GnomeMeeting. It makes things easier. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 07:29:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687133B0730 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:29:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19977-03 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BACB3B08AE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9644AB40; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:35:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Fwd: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1] From: Damien Sandras To: Ashutosh Sharma In-Reply-To: <1109592911.3980.170.camel@sipl25> References: <1109585374.3614.59.camel@golgoth01> <4222F49E.6030700@netikka.fi> <1109592911.3980.170.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:29:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1109593788.8626.2.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Johnny Strom , gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:29:51 -0000 Hi, Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 17:45 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi, > Well thanks. > And I am sorry. I think the problem was from my side only. Actually I > forgot to remove the builtin GM 0.98.5 version. Now when I uninstalled > it then I again did make && make install and it works fine. Thanks once > again for the help and I am sorry. No problem :) > Anyway the new GM is really very nice. I saw and then I found that in > the Audio Codec List there is no option for G.723.1 because in the > earlier versions it used to be there. Yes, it automagically appears now when available, but it is only available when using Quicknet cards (no driver yet for the 2.6 kernel though) > And I want to know why there are two different Audio Plugins > (OSS/Quicknet). If I have Quicknet h/w and then I select OSS then is > this fine ?? or will it hamper the overall performance. > If you have Quicknet hardware and select OSS (or ALSA), then it will use OSS (or ALSA) but not Quicknet hardware, it means that G.723.1 won't be available, and it also means that you will use your soundcard instead of a real POTS or headset plugged into the Quicknet card. > Also I want to know is there any PTZ Camera and WebCam which may have > the compatibility with the OpenH323 and GM. Because I don't know but you > people might have used it while doing conferencing. I don't know what a PTZ camera is, but any camera compatible with video4Linux and supported by the Linux kernel will work with GnomeMeeting. I usually recommend Philips cameras (ToUCam PRO). > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh. > > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 16:08, Johnny Strom wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > Here I have the following versions of Orbit and Bonobo on fedora core 2 > > and it works fine here: > > > > > > Bonobo: > > bonobo-1.0.22-8.1 > > gnome-python2-bonobo-2.0.0-4.1 > > libbonobo-devel-2.6.2-1 > > libbonoboui-2.6.0-1 > > bonobo-devel-1.0.22-8.1 > > libbonobo-2.6.2-1 > > libbonoboui-devel-2.6.0-1 > > > > > > Orbit: > > ORBit-0.5.17-11.4.1 > > ORBit2-devel-2.10.0-4 > > ORBit2-2.10.0-4 > > ORBit-devel-0.5.17-11.4.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Damien Sandras wrote: > > > -------- Message transféré -------- > > > De: Ashutosh Sharma > > > Répondre à : GnomeMeeting mailing list > > > ä: GnomeMeeting mailing list > > > Cc: OpenH323 Mailing List > > > Objet: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 > > > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:19:37 +0530 > > > hello All, > > > > > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > > > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > > > ============================================ > > > Packages:- > > > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > > > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > > > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > > > glib-2.6.2 > > > pango-1.8.0 > > > atk-1.9.0 > > > gtk+-2.6.2 > > > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > > > howl-0.9.7-1 > > > > > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > > > > > And the devel packages also. > > > > > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > > > ============================================ > > > Error:- > > > > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > > > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > > > > > > > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > > > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): > > > should not be reached > > > aborting... > > > > > > And a dialog box appears which says:- > > > <<<< > > > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > > > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". > > > <<<< > > > > > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > > > <<<<<<<< > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > > > > > ................ > > > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > > > gnomemeeting > > > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 > > > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > > > .......... > > > <<<<<<<<<< > > > ============================================ > > > > > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > > > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > > > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > > > the latest GTK version. > > > > > > Please help me in this context. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk Mon Feb 28 07:42:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317AF3B099B for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:42:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20570-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:42:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx01.stofanet.dk (mx01.stofanet.dk [212.10.10.11]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0A73B0744 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:42:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from 3e6b2209.rev.stofanet.dk ([62.107.34.9]) by mx01.stofanet.dk (envelope-from ) with esmtp id 1D5kED-0002Eb-1r for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:42:26 +0100 From: Duncan Lithgow To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:42:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502281342.31520.duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Can't contact LDAP server. X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:42:29 -0000 Okay, freshly installed on FC3 but no joy yet. a. on firing it up from the command line i get: --- Cannot contact the user directory Failed to bind to user directory: Can't contact LDAP server. --- b. how do i get it to appear on the applications menu? Ideas for fixing these? Thanks, Duncan -- Linux user #372812: more stable and cheaper than windows GnuPG Public Key ID: 0x2BB9667C21A8C63A: protecting your security From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 07:45:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C1F3B099B for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:45:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20794-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:45:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F7A3B08F4 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:45:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C421B442; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:51:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Can't contact LDAP server. From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk In-Reply-To: <200502281342.31520.duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk> References: <200502281342.31520.duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:45:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1109594739.8626.13.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:45:42 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 13:42 +0100, Duncan Lithgow a écrit : > Okay, freshly installed on FC3 but no joy yet. > > a. on firing it up from the command line i get: > --- > Cannot contact the user directory > Failed to bind to user directory: Can't contact LDAP server. > --- > When do you get that? When trying to refresh the LDAP server or the ILS server? The LDAP server is for future extension, it is not supported yet. The ILS server should work. > b. how do i get it to appear on the applications menu? > It should be available in the GNOME menus after installation. If not, it is a bug in the packages you have used to install GnomeMeeting. Actually you should have : /usr/share/applications/gnomemeeting.desktop And once you have that, it should appear in the menu in the "Internet" category. Perhaps your distribution is using another path, for example, SuSE is using /opt/usr instead of /usr/ iirc. > Ideas for fixing these? Thanks, Duncan > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From macciardi@arnet.com.ar Thu Feb 17 21:55:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DDB3B0718 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:55:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25040-06 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:55:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp6.arnet.com.ar (smtp6.arnet.com.ar [200.45.191.24]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D4033B067F for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:55:13 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 29683 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2005 02:54:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?201.252.17.5?) (201.252.17.5) by smtp6.arnet.com.ar with SMTP; 18 Feb 2005 02:54:14 -0000 Message-ID: <42152318.3020002@arnet.com.ar> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:04:56 +0100 From: Mariano Acciardi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:10 -0500 Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Interface language X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:55:17 -0000 Hi all, I wan't to ask some question. I'just installed gnomemeeting Version GnomeMeeting 1.0.2 on KDE and the language of the screen interface I think is german. Can I change language to English? I didn't found the place in menu to to this. Are they some files to modify? Thank you Best Regards Mariano From Philippe.Combes@ens-lyon.fr Sat Feb 26 19:15:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4BD3B0890 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:15:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16784-01 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:15:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B193B08C1 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:15:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from [82.253.121.230] (lns-vlq-37-lyo-82-253-121-230.adsl.proxad.net [82.253.121.230]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEE12BEEA9 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:15:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <42211244.8080106@ens-lyon.fr> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:20:20 +0100 From: Philippe Combes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr-ch, fr-be, fr-lu, fr-mc, en-gb, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:32 -0500 Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] ALSA not detected X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:15:17 -0000 Hi all, I am not a subscriber to the list, so please let me in CC... I have compiled GM 1.2 on my system (Debian sid - 2.4.27) and installed it, as well as its dependencies (PWLib, openH323) in /usr/local. I have compiled, installed and loaded the alsa modules for my kernel, and I can listen to audio files with my sound card (so it seems my ALSA modules work ! - the old OSS driver for my card has not been built in my kernel, and so is not involved) But the DRUID does not detect ALSA and only propose Quicknet choice as regards the audio plugin. I guess it is a problem of ALSA installation, but what ? What does the druid look for to detect ALSA ? Thanks in advance for any help. Philippe From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 08:09:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434173B0744 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:09:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22781-08 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:09:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97EF3B0730 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:09:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98C31B46F; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:15:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Interface language From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42152318.3020002@arnet.com.ar> References: <42152318.3020002@arnet.com.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:09:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1109596175.8626.18.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Mariano Acciardi X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:09:37 -0000 Hello, Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 00:04 +0100, Mariano Acciardi a écrit : > Hi all, > > I wan't to ask some question. I'just installed gnomemeeting Version > GnomeMeeting 1.0.2 on KDE and the language of the screen interface I > think is german. Can I change language to English? I didn't found the > place in menu to to this. Are they some files to modify? > It is a setting of your distribution. There is no configuration in GnomeMeeting for this, but there is certainly a tool in your distribution to change it. If you can not change it, just run GnomeMeeting from a terminal this way : LC_ALL=C gnomemeeting It will be in english. > Thank you > Best Regards > Mariano > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 08:11:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895523B0876 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22966-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7BC3B0800 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A859412BEF; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:17:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] ALSA not detected From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42211244.8080106@ens-lyon.fr> References: <42211244.8080106@ens-lyon.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:11:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1109596309.8626.22.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Philippe Combes X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:11:51 -0000 Hi, Le dimanche 27 février 2005 à 01:20 +0100, Philippe Combes a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am not a subscriber to the list, so please let me in CC... > There is so much SPAM that you have been lucky that I have seen your email in the mass of spams. > I have compiled GM 1.2 on my system (Debian sid - 2.4.27) and installed > it, as well as its dependencies (PWLib, openH323) in /usr/local. > I have compiled, installed and loaded the alsa modules for my kernel, > and I can listen to audio files with my sound card (so it seems my ALSA > modules work ! - the old OSS driver for my card has not been built in my > kernel, and so is not involved) > > But the DRUID does not detect ALSA and only propose Quicknet choice as > regards the audio plugin. > I guess it is a problem of ALSA installation, but what ? > What does the druid look for to detect ALSA ? > the alsa plugin has probably not been compiled because you don't have libasound-dev, or it has not been installed in /usr/lib/pwlib/ or /usr/local/lib/pwlib/ But why don't you use standard debian packages to get 1.2? damien@golgoth01:~$ apt-cache policy gnomemeeting gnomemeeting: Installés : (aucun) Candidat : 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-2 Table de version : 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-2 0 500 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/main Packages damien@golgoth01:~$ It even contains the 1.2.1 patches! > Thanks in advance for any help. > > Philippe > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 08:54:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348C43B06CA for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:54:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25590-05 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:54:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5D03B0A47 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:53:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0CAC457; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:59:38 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 From: Damien Sandras To: Ian Firla In-Reply-To: <11e9231d050228054064ee3c77@mail.gmail.com> References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> <1109582977.3614.20.camel@golgoth01> <11e9231d050228054064ee3c77@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:53:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1109598832.8626.34.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:54:49 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 14:40 +0100, Ian Firla a écrit : > I only appear to have the pwc module compiled. > > Where can I grab the sources for pwcx? > Here: http://www.saillard.org/linux/pwc/ > Ian > > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:29:37 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 13:22 +0100, Ian Firla a écrit : > > > I tried that already. > > > > > > I also tried changing formats from ntsc to pal to secam, etc. > > > > > > Thanks anyway! > > > > I have not tried GnomeMeeting yet with a recent kernel, but I know there > > was a bug in the driver. Can you try loading pwcx ? > > > > -- > > _ Damien Sandras > > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > > v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From Peter.K.Martin@t-online.de Mon Feb 28 12:37:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2973B0D45 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:37:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08527-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:37:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578053B0D87 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:36:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd30.aul.t-online.de by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5ooZ-00033i-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:36:15 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.76] (XGZ7o+Zv8e6bsUXNzlYTDQHJsa8slukTFxVhdLgd4qjejM+ZP11SrY@[217.244.215.129]) by fwd30.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D5ooU-05wTXE0; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:36:10 +0100 From: "Peter K. Martin" To: GnomeMeeting Mailing Liste Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:35:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502281836.06676.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> X-ID: XGZ7o+Zv8e6bsUXNzlYTDQHJsa8slukTFxVhdLgd4qjejM+ZP11SrY X-TOI-MSGID: 9ccc09b6-5f29-4a6b-9639-7bd2237471f7 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] GnomeMeeting 1.2 and SuSE 9.2 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:37:36 -0000 --nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, today I tried to install GnomeMeeting 1.2. I got the download RPMs for SuSE= =20 9.1 and so I think there are little incompatibilities as I get error messag= es=20 from YaST like missing liblber.so.199 libldap_r.so.199 libldap.so.199 the OpenLDAP-client 2 is installed via YaST. So I don't know what to do at = the=20 moment. Perhaps there is someone who kindly compile a version of RPMs for=20 SuSE 9.2? You get with the SuSE 9.2 Distrib. only the version 1.0 of GnomeMeeting and= I=20 think there are a lot of improvements in version 1.2. Kind regards Peter =2D-=20 --nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCI1aGhlrz1G3ipzQRApyCAJwLdfqh5kn8CcU28fde/EmHC2iD5gCfdBDh YsyLVBeo+TYPfBszufjP3R4= =+Hkv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK-- From asharma@samyak.com Tue Feb 1 07:39:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50723B0A6D for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11872-07 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA1E3B119C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:39:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:09:07 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020118085702698 ; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:08:57 +0530 Message-ID: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:08:20 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2005 12:39:07.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[05482EF0:01C5085B] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Bhaskar Trivedi , GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Which Audio/Video Codec source codes are available freely X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 12:39:18 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, I want to know whether the source codes for all Audio & Video codecs = available under Linux for H.323 based communication. G.711, G.722, G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729 H.261, H.263 From the voxgratia FAQ I got to know that G.728 and G.729 are not = freely available. Please help. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello All,
 
   I want to know whether the = source=20 codes for all Audio & Video codecs available under = Linux=20 for H.323 based communication.
 
  G.711, G.722,=20 G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729
  H.261, H.263
 
 From the voxgratia FAQ I got to = know that=20 G.728 and G.729 are not freely available.
 
Please help.
 
Thanks and regards,
Ashutosh = Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C50889.033390E0-- From craigs@postincrement.com Tue Feb 1 15:18:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CD83B12AF for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08921-02 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344053B141C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.13] (rapido.southeren.com [10.0.2.13]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j11KHnxB016004; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:17:50 +1100 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:17:52 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: "asharma" , , "Bhaskar Trivedi" , "GnomeMeeting mailing list" In-Reply-To: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <00af01c5085a$efc96800$1970640a@Samyak.com> Message-Id: <20050202071435.837F.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [OpenH323]Which Audio/Video Codec source codes are available freely X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:18:13 -0000 On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:08:20 +0530 "asharma" wrote: > Hello All, > > I want to know whether the source codes for all Audio & Video codecs available under Linux for H.323 based communication. > > G.711, G.722, G.723,G.723.1,G.728,G.729 > H.261, H.263 > > From the voxgratia FAQ I got to know that G.728 and G.729 are not freely available. The Vox Gratia FAQ does not mention G.728. But here is a general overview of the state of each of these codecs: G.711 - available in OpenH323 G.722 - available in OpenH323 G.723 - now G.726. Available in OpenH323 G.723.1 - patented G.728 = patented G.729 = patented H.261 - available in OpenH323 H.263 - Patent status uncertain. Available in OpenH323. Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 2 09:50:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1343B14D5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:50:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22369-10 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:49:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273EA3B09EE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:49:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:20:23 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020220202204198 ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:20:23 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: openh323@openh323.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:19:53 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2005 14:50:23.0703 (UTC) FILETIME=[865CA670:01C50936] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:50:01 -0000 Hi all, I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I tried "make both" then I got the following error:- //////////// g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constr uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, from main.cxx:94: /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or directory /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or directory main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, PConfigPage*)': main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 ////////// In main.cxx the line no 570 is as follows:- SetCapability(0, 0, new H323_GSM0610Capability); Now when I tried to comment out that and again did the same task then I got the following erroneous trace:- ///////// g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constr uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, from main.cxx:94: /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or directory /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or directory make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 //////// Please help. Thanks and Regards, A. Sharma From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 2 09:52:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CDE3B1559 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22688-06 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2053B154C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D9312A62 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:53:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:52:19 +0100 Message-Id: <1107355939.3317.81.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:52:23 -0000 Hi, Sorry but a compilation error regarding opengk is off-topic for the GnomeMeeting mailing list. Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 20:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. > > First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I > tried "make both" then I got the following error:- > > //////////// > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl > ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os > -felide-constr > uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > from main.cxx:94: > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, > PConfigPage*)': > main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > > ////////// > > In main.cxx the line no 570 is as follows:- > > SetCapability(0, 0, new H323_GSM0610Capability); > > Now when I tried to comment out that and again did the same task then I > got the following erroneous trace:- > > ///////// > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constr uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > from main.cxx:94: > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > //////// > > Please help. > Thanks and Regards, > A. Sharma > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 10:26:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F5D3B158A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:26:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24607-09 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:26:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08943B1587 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:26:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwMOo-0001vl-1p for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:26:34 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwMOm-0008WF-6M for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:26:32 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:26:32 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:26:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1107357991.5083.6.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:26:38 -0000 --=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ashutosh, > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 looks like a broken or incomplete Qt installation to me.. Just my 2 Ct. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAPEnvdkzt4X+wX8RAhdqAJ9ciGnCH48TbwH995/u/nm3aPmR9gCeI/w7 13vfB1AjRx0GjPkXfFUW8+U= =OQYh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-geD2uY+EmF8IJ8ucfie/-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 11:52:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5433B0C18 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30333-05 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.33]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA3F63B096C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:52:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 16:52:44 -0000 From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:52:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:52:48 -0000 Hi guys I'm trying to build GM Opal and grabbed basically all involved packages from http://snapshots.seconix.com/cvs/ i.e. gnomemeeting-opal, opal, openh323 and pwlib. Unfortunately, I have trouble building pwlib, the make run seems to build only parts and the install fails halfway through. My configure is pretty simple: ./configure --prefix=/opt/opal --enable-plugins Do I need to set extra options? Or actually another pwlib version, since GM seems to require 1.8.3 while that tgz identifies itself as 1.8.4 ? Thanks, Bruno. From lurch@gmx.li Wed Feb 2 12:25:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62523B0812 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00659-06 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A613B0ABF for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IBA00CXSOEF3S@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j12HPQGL011055 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:26 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 12275 invoked from network); Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:25:25 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:25:25 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:18 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk In-reply-to: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502021825.24416.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:25:30 -0000 --nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 15:49 schrieb Ashutosh Sharma: > Hi all, > > I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. > > First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I > tried "make both" then I got the following error:- > > //////////// > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl > ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os > -felide-constr > uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > from main.cxx:94: > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > directory > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > directory > main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, > PConfigPage*)': > main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 I think you did something really stupid - make could not find gsmcodec.h, s= o=20 you copied it from somewhere on your disk? The gsmcodec.h which you have in /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/ is from= =20 qtopia! Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=C3=BCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAQ0Eb39KPYz+qlMRAuYUAKCGHQWQcQ3lZKx5pZOt3B8cUBXhEQCgk3A1 +jaOhOeJVHbI4QChCNummrs= =Sr+n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1299455.VxbZrRlKxB-- From kk_konrad@gmx.at Wed Feb 2 12:55:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDB63B0B5A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:55:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02503-04 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:55:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EB913B0689 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:55:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Feb 2005 17:55:31 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 02 Feb 2005 18:55:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:55:23 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Message-ID: <20050202175523.GA16172localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:55:35 -0000 Hi, I am running against a wall with netmeeting 3.01 on XP + meetspeex <-> gnomemeeting-1.2.0 on Fedora FC3: I am unable to get both sides to use at least one of the low bandwidth speex codecs (i already played a lot around with meetspeex rearranging/enabling/disabling codecs). gnomemeeting happily transmits to netmeeting using speexw 8kHz (audio gets actually through), but netmeeting transmit either uses the uncompressed G711 codecs (too much bandwidth), MS-GSM if I enable it (bad audio quality) or nothing if I am allowing only speex at gmomemeeting. (speexw and all others tried) Is there anybody who has solved the puzzle or is it unsolvable? I am interested in audio only at the moment but this can change easily :-) Regards, Konrad PS: I second the question about the gnomemeeting on windows status question. Is there anything to start with? What are the major problems expected? PPS: anybody tried getting a DV camcorder (ieee1394) to work with gnomemeeting? From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 13:55:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C7D3B0B94 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:55:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06103-01 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:55:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8953B07A7 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:55:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwPey-0004vC-VB for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:55:29 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwPew-00024B-Dn for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:55:26 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:55:26 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:55:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:55:34 -0000 --=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruno, > I'm trying to build GM Opal and grabbed basically all involved packages > from http://snapshots.seconix.com/cvs/ > i.e. gnomemeeting-opal, opal, openh323 and pwlib. >=20 > Unfortunately, I have trouble building pwlib, the make run seems to > build only parts and the install fails halfway through. what errormsg are you encountering and what arch trying to build on? Amd64 is known to need CFLAGS=3D"-fPIC -DPIC" to compile ok (but the errormsg would tell you that anyway). --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCASIevdkzt4X+wX8RAkN0AJ4xtNVZao0hW5ukkC5FCT5oToapnQCdGmZQ FnFvYgvBMgbuhYWI4SppFSM= =CgrQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mbRhg3rq211fjcUJ8B7y-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 14:22:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99D73B0C8A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:22:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07442-09 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:22:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02F453B0CE2 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:22:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 19:22:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:22:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:22:05 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 19:55 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > what errormsg are you encountering and what arch trying to build on? > Amd64 is known to need CFLAGS="-fPIC -DPIC" to compile ok (but the > errormsg would tell you that anyway). > Fedora Core 3 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 #1 Thu Nov 18 15:10:10 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux FYI: I build other pwlib versions (like Janus for asterisk) on the same machine without problems. Seems the plugins configure goes wrong the whole way. No sound support detected although e.g. OSS support and sys/soundcard.h are available: configure: configuring in plugins configure: running /bin/sh './configure' --prefix=/opt/opal '--prefix=/opt/opal' '--enable-plugins' --cache-file=/dev/null --srcdir=. checking for g++... g++ checking for C++ compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes Plugin source directory is /home/bruno/dl/voip/opal/pwlib/plugins checking sys/soundcard.h usability... no checking sys/soundcard.h presence... no checking for sys/soundcard.h... no checking for OSS sound support... no checking machine/ioctl_meteor.h usability... no checking machine/ioctl_meteor.h presence... no checking for machine/ioctl_meteor.h... no checking i386/ioctl_meteor.h usability... no checking i386/ioctl_meteor.h presence... no checking for i386/ioctl_meteor.h... no checking dev/ic/bt8xx.h usability... no checking dev/ic/bt8xx.h presence... no checking for dev/ic/bt8xx.h... no checking for BSD video support... no checking libavc1394/avc1394.h usability... no checking libavc1394/avc1394.h presence... no checking for libavc1394/avc1394.h... no checking libdv/dv.h usability... no checking libdv/dv.h presence... no checking for libdv/dv.h... no checking libraw1394/raw1394.h usability... no checking libraw1394/raw1394.h presence... no checking for libraw1394/raw1394.h... no checking for IEEE1394/AVC video support... no configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating vidinput_dc/Makefile Make then goes OK, but make install gives ( for dir in /opt/opal/lib \ /opt/opal/include/ptlib \ /opt/opal/include/ptlib/unix/ptlib \ /opt/opal/include/ptclib \ /opt/opal/share/pwlib/make ; \ do mkdir -p $dir ; chmod 755 $dir ; \ done ) /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 /opt/opal/lib (cd /opt/opal/lib ; \ rm -f libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8 ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8 \ ) (cd /opt/opal/lib ; \ rm -f libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1 ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1 \ ) (cd /opt/opal/lib ; \ rm -f libpt_linux_x86_r.so ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.4 libpt_linux_x86_r.so \ ) (cd /opt/opal/lib; \ rm -f libpt.so ; \ ln -sf libpt_linux_x86_r.so libpt.so \ ) cd plugins/pwlib/device/ ; \ ( for dir in ./* ;\ do mkdir -p /opt/opal/lib/pwlib/devices/$dir ; \ chmod 755 /opt/opal/lib/pwlib/devices/$dir ; \ (for fn in ./$dir/*.so ; \ do /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $fn /opt/opal/lib/pwlib/devices/$dir; \ done ); \ done ) /bin/sh: line 0: cd: plugins/pwlib/device/: No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././a.out/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ChangeLog/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ChangeLog.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.guess/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.log/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.status/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././config.sub/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././configure/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././configure.ac/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././configure.exe/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././CVS/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././History.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././include/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././install-sh/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././make/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././Makefile/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././Makefile.in/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././mpl-1.0.htm/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././msvc6_upgrade.bat/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././plugins/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlibce.vcp/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlibce.vcw/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib_cfg.dxy/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.dsw/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.dxx/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.dxy/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.mak/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.sln/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.vcp/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.wpj/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././pwlib.wsp/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ReadMe_QOS.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././ReadMe.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././README_VXWORKS.txt/*.so': Not a directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././samples/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././src/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././tools/*.so': No such file or directory /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `././version.h/*.so': Not a directory make: *** [install] Error 1 Regards, Bruno. From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 14:28:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBBF3B1589 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:28:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07905-05 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:28:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937DE3B15C8 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:27:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwQ9t-0005VR-Kz for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:25 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwQ9r-0002LJ-Pb for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:23 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:27:23 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:28:34 -0000 --=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruno, > /bin/sh: line 0: cd: plugins/pwlib/device/: No such file or directory yes, that's a bug i also encountered. Craig so far has no "fix" for this. Will keep you posted once this is resolved. Until then try to compile without plugins. ;) --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBCASmbvdkzt4X+wX8RAitZAJ4lS4QTtLZogYRyjBieKIWhR4mFlQCUD9ZP +/IP+88C0ubHh1ypp8tWUw== =kUDY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HLNt4xokgKeiByh9riVB-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 14:51:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6C73B0955 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:51:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09576-09 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:51:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.36]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 547EB3B0E50 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:51:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 19:51:47 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:51:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1107373910.3826.34.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:51:50 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:27 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > yes, that's a bug i also encountered. Craig so far has no "fix" for > this. Will keep you posted once this is resolved. Until then try to > compile without plugins. ;) Alrighty. Thanks, Bruno. From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 15:17:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328063B0BDE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11140-05 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A88413B09D1 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 20:17:23 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:17:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:17:25 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:27 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > yes, that's a bug i also encountered. Craig so far has no "fix" for > this. Will keep you posted once this is resolved. Until then try to > compile without plugins. ;) OK, I'm giving up. GM doesn't configure through because pwlib without plugins still references plugin symbols. E.g. with x.c: int main() {} and gcc -o x x.c -L/opt/opal/lib -lpt I get /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPluginsProviding(PString const&) const' /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetServiceDescriptor(PString const&, PString const&)' /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPluginManager()' /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::RegisterService(PString const&, PString const&, PPluginServiceDescriptor*)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Bye for now, Bruno. From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 2 15:26:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55F03B15E2 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:26:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11868-02 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:26:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7533B15DE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:26:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwR4m-0006Fy-FZ for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:12 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwR4k-0002Zx-Bu for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:10 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:10 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:10 +0100 Message-Id: <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:26:16 -0000 --=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruno, > I get > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPlugin= sProviding(PString const&) const' > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetServic= eDescriptor(PString const&, PString const&)' > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::GetPlugin= Manager()' > /opt/opal/lib/libpt.so: undefined reference to `PPluginManager::RegisterS= ervice(PString const&, PString const&, PPluginServiceDescriptor*)' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status that's most probably Damien's missing opal/pwlib patch. There is still one patch missing which he does reckon is needed for GM2CVS which isn't yet upstream for some reasons. Maybe he can post it on the gm-dev mailinglist or tell us when this'll hit upstream. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCATdivdkzt4X+wX8RArWlAJ4uWDyH0Eb/phjWQpkt1qJSYvb3jQCfev6Y 0OQx+h6DTy4rT6yBIEZp910= =PDgE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TlwXuN0RlvbvxNdBPskO-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Wed Feb 2 15:43:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF873B15F6 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:43:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13474-10 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:43:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A304D3B15EE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:43:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 20:43:16 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:43:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:43:18 -0000 On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:26 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > that's most probably Damien's missing opal/pwlib patch. There is still > one patch missing which he does reckon is needed for GM2CVS which isn't > yet upstream for some reasons. Maybe he can post it on the gm-dev > mailinglist or tell us when this'll hit upstream. OK, I'll watch out for it or either try the next snapshots coming. Thanks a lot for your clarifications. Regards, Bruno. PS: Just fyi, one reason I'm trying this is SIP support. Since I've been fiddling with asterisk for two months right now and using various softphones on the way, I like to use GM because it's been best, regarding robustness, sound quality and latency. Also, one regular question on the * users list is which softphone to use, and I myself do recommend GM but people seem to prefer SIP for various reasons (registration/gatekeeper hassle, etc). Anyway, I know it's early but I thought I'd give it a shot ... :) From johannes@vanster.nu Wed Feb 2 21:26:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C653B06BE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30659-04 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail2.space2u.com (mail2.space2u.com [62.20.1.161]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF933B06BC for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:26:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [83.226.47.14] (c-0e2fe253.234-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.226.47.14]) by mail2.space2u.com (8.13.3/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j132QoO0028277 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:26:52 +0100 Message-ID: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 03:26:49 +0100 From: Johannes User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] YDL, BT and Skype X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:26:58 -0000 Hi! I have some small questions before starting to use GnomeMeeting: Is there a way for a non-linux-experienced user such as myself to install it on YellowDogLinux? Does GnomeMeeting work with Bluetooth Headsets? Can one call Skype Users/Log onto Skype accounts? What about AIMs? y.c. Johannes Sweden From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 2 23:40:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5685D3B077D for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03461-07 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF43B08F9 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:11:00 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020310105904643 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:10:59 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107357991.5083.6.camel@ganymede> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> <1107357991.5083.6.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1107405633.4041.4.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:10:33 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2005 04:41:00.0640 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F7DBE00:01C509AA] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:40:33 -0000 Well thanks for the reply, But I got able to correct the mistake... What I did that I included the path to qconfig.h in the command itself and it did work. But the problem was that that I had to run the two commands separately for making release and debug exes. Can anyone suggest me the proper way because I didn't find any thing related to include files in the Makefile and also I had to comment out the GSMCodecCapability Line because it was giving me the unreference statement. Well when I was done with the complete installation, I tried http://:1719 which gave me the property page but it asked me for the Username and Password. I tried admin/secret but in vain. Can you please tell me about the authentication problem. THanks and Regards, Ashutosh On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:56, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Ashutosh, > > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > > directory > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > > directory > > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > looks like a broken or incomplete Qt installation to me.. > > Just my 2 Ct. From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 2 23:44:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2340B3B066A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:44:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03628-10 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:44:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245813B08FA for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:44:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:14:35 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020310143404646 ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:14:35 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error Compiling OpenGk From: Ashutosh Sharma To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502021825.24416.lurch@gmx.li> References: <1107355793.3997.30.camel@sipl25> <200502021825.24416.lurch@gmx.li> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1107405848.4041.7.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:14:08 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2005 04:44:35.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[0FA8DE70:01C509AB] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:44:09 -0000 Hi, Well I didn't do anything like that. I was just doing the normal compilation process. But I was able to resolve the prob by including the path containing qconfig.h on the command line. But I don't know but I had to comment out the GSMCodec Line in the main.cxx otherwise it was not able to find the definition of that. REgards, Ashutosh On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 22:55, Stefan Bruens wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 15:49 schrieb Ashutosh Sharma: > > Hi all, > > > > I am having certain problem regarding OpenGK and GnomeMeeting. > > > > First of all I tried to compile the OpenGK1.3.4 on my PC. When I > > tried "make both" then I got the following error:- > > > > //////////// > > > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -D_REENTRANT -Wall > > -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/../pwlib/incl > > ude -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/apps/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os > > -felide-constr > > uctors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_r/main.o > > In file included from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qshared.h:42, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qgarray.h:42, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qmemarray.h:42, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qcstring.h:43, > > from /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qstring.h:42, > > from /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/gsmcodec.h:24, > > from main.cxx:94: > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:714:21: qconfig.h: No such file or > > directory > > /usr/lib/qt-3.1/include/qglobal.h:777:23: qfeatures.h: No such file or > > directory > > main.cxx: In member function `BOOL MyEndPoint::Initialise(PConfig&, > > PConfigPage*)': > > main.cxx:570: error: syntax error before `)' token > > make: *** [obj_linux_x86_r/main.o] Error 1 > > I think you did something really stupid - make could not find gsmcodec.h, so > you copied it from somewhere on your disk? > > The gsmcodec.h which you have in /usr/share/apps/openh323/include/ is from > qtopia! > > Greetings, > > Stefan From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 03:24:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A723C3B0976 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:24:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13314-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:24:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFEB3B06AF for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:24:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81FE18C3D for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:25:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:24:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1107419058.3325.8.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:24:21 -0000 Hi, I don't think your error is due to my missing patch, but plugins are currently broken for some reason in pwlib. I will make an announce here when I consider GM Opal as usable :) Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 21:43 +0100, Bruno Hertz a écrit : > On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:26 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: > > > that's most probably Damien's missing opal/pwlib patch. There is still > > one patch missing which he does reckon is needed for GM2CVS which isn't > > yet upstream for some reasons. Maybe he can post it on the gm-dev > > mailinglist or tell us when this'll hit upstream. > > OK, I'll watch out for it or either try the next snapshots coming. > Thanks a lot for your clarifications. > > Regards, Bruno. > > PS: Just fyi, one reason I'm trying this is SIP support. Since I've > been fiddling with asterisk for two months right now and using various > softphones on the way, I like to use GM because it's been best, > regarding robustness, sound quality and latency. Also, one regular > question on the * users list is which softphone to use, and I myself > do recommend GM but people seem to prefer SIP for various reasons > (registration/gatekeeper hassle, etc). Anyway, I know it's early but > I thought I'd give it a shot ... :) > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 03:25:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1BF3B06AF for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:25:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13499-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:25:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0D53B0819 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FA818C3D for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:27:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050202175523.GA16172localhost> References: <20050202175523.GA16172localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:25:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:25:58 -0000 Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 18:55 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > Hi, > > I am running against a wall with netmeeting 3.01 on XP + > meetspeex <-> gnomemeeting-1.2.0 on Fedora FC3: > > I am unable to get both sides to use at least one of > the low bandwidth speex codecs (i already played a lot > around with meetspeex rearranging/enabling/disabling codecs). > > gnomemeeting happily transmits to netmeeting using speexw 8kHz > (audio gets actually through), but netmeeting transmit either uses the > uncompressed G711 codecs (too much bandwidth), MS-GSM if I > enable it (bad audio quality) or nothing if I am allowing > only speex at gmomemeeting. (speexw and all others tried) > > Is there anybody who has solved the puzzle or is it > unsolvable? I am interested in audio only at the moment but > this can change easily :-) Have you checked the FAQ on voxgratia.org? they have a short howto. I would say that Speex is not installed correctly on the netmeeting side. > > Regards, > > Konrad > > PS: I second the question about the gnomemeeting on windows > status question. Is there anything to start with? > Unfortunately not... > What are the major problems expected? > > A very long compilation time. Except that, it should work. > PPS: anybody tried getting a DV camcorder (ieee1394) to > work with gnomemeeting? It is supposed to work :) > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 03:27:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3A63B07ED for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:27:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13664-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A593B06D1 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED5121AE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:29:12 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] YDL, BT and Skype From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> References: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:27:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1107419263.3325.14.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:27:45 -0000 Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 03:26 +0100, Johannes a écrit : > Hi! > I have some small questions before starting to use GnomeMeeting: > > Is there a way for a non-linux-experienced user such as myself to > install it on YellowDogLinux? > It should ship with the YDL installation CD. From there, you can install it as any other software on YDL, using RPM (I think). > Does GnomeMeeting work with Bluetooth Headsets? If the Bluetooth headset works with Linux, yes, it will work. > > Can one call Skype Users/Log onto Skype accounts? What about AIMs? > That's impossible, Skype is using a proprietary protocol. GnomeMeeting is currently compatible with any H.323 software. Next release will also be compatible with SIP software (including Windows Messenger, not MSN Messenger). > y.c. > Johannes > Sweden > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Thu Feb 3 04:19:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927383B0C74 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 04:19:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16719-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 04:19:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5A03B0996 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 04:19:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwd9I-00036v-9f for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:19:40 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwd9G-0003La-EG for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:19:38 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:19:39 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> References: <42018BE9.7050905@vanster.nu> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:19:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1107422378.5615.5.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] YDL, BT and Skype Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:19:57 -0000 --=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Johannes, > Does GnomeMeeting work with Bluetooth Headsets? just to add some small note to limit the expextations. Last time I tried the sampling was at 8kHz and thus no great audio quality. Maybe BlueZ folks have fixed this in the meantime, but don't *expect* miracles, only be happy when they occur. ;) --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAeyqvdkzt4X+wX8RApaBAJ91nPYNVzPE90vYKRfJWfp7skSzBACdEYnO P7Sti1UoQexn2fHMFLKCZeg= =nQND -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-udrTmq5asczkfwBQNPUm-- From kk_konrad@gmx.at Thu Feb 3 05:31:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA42E3B0A91 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:31:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20483-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:31:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 690153B0764 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:31:00 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2005 10:30:57 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2005 11:30:57 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:30:54 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050203103000.GA25620localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:31:02 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:25:54AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 18:55 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I am running against a wall with netmeeting 3.01 on XP + > > meetspeex <-> gnomemeeting-1.2.0 on Fedora FC3: > > > [...deleted...] > > Have you checked the FAQ on voxgratia.org? they have a short howto. I > would say that Speex is not installed correctly on the netmeeting side. I read several times over the FAQ's and also the instructions on the speexw site (link from gnomemeeting.org's FAQ). It must be some obscure detail - I tried netmeeting on Win2000 and XP and it is always the same: NM receives speexw 8khz but refuses to use it on transmit. The most I could get from NM was MS-GSM but the sound was horrible (background noise like 'grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr' all the time besides the usual GSM artifacts) one detail: the codecs listed by meetspeex at bottom do show up in netmeetings drop down codec list. [....] > > > PPS: anybody tried getting a DV camcorder (ieee1394) to > > work with gnomemeeting? > > It is supposed to work :) I confess I did not even try since the 1394 device does not show up as a video4linux device. Did you mean 'work out of the box'? (will give it a try this evening anyways :) Perhaps there is some hack required (using the v4l loopback device)? The NM/GM speex issue is puzzling me most at the moment - it is difficult to get everybody using linux. An additional question: (I am almost totally ignorant about SIP) is it possible to have two SIP devices communicate to each other w/o having to use such stuff like registrar etc (as it is possible now with NM/gnomemeeting by simply entering IP address to connect? (assuming they are on the same network, no NAT etc) Regards, Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 05:40:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6613B0928 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:40:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21039-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:40:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5883B0926 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:40:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FEA183D4 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:42:04 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050203103000.GA25620localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <20050203103000.GA25620localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:40:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:40:38 -0000 Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > I read several times over the FAQ's and also the instructions on the > speexw site (link from gnomemeeting.org's FAQ). It must be some obscure > detail - I tried netmeeting on Win2000 and XP and it is always the same: > NM receives speexw 8khz but refuses to use it on transmit. The most I > could get from NM was MS-GSM but the sound was horrible > (background noise like 'grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr' all the time besides the > usual GSM artifacts) > > one detail: the codecs listed by meetspeex at bottom do > show up in netmeetings drop down codec list. > I have no idea about this, perhaps you could try to contact them? > I confess I did not even try since the 1394 device does not show > up as a video4linux device. Did you mean 'work out of the box'? > (will give it a try this evening anyways :) Perhaps there is some > hack required (using the v4l loopback device)? > That is not a video4linux device. You have to install a separate plugin for this kind of camera (either the AVC or the DC one) > > The NM/GM speex issue is puzzling me most at the moment - it > is difficult to get everybody using linux. > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > An additional question: (I am almost totally ignorant about SIP) > > is it possible to have two SIP devices communicate to each other > w/o having to use such stuff like registrar etc (as it is possible > now with NM/gnomemeeting by simply entering IP address to connect? > (assuming they are on the same network, no NAT etc) > yes you can do that. > Regards, > > Konrad > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From brrhtz@yahoo.de Thu Feb 3 05:43:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A39F3B0BBE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:43:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21072-08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:43:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C38713B0A71 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:43:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2005 10:43:41 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Snapshot build (especially pwlib). From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1107419058.3325.8.camel@golgoth01> References: <1107363167.3826.10.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107370526.5083.12.camel@ganymede> <1107372123.3826.32.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107372443.5083.14.camel@ganymede> <1107375446.3826.39.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107375970.5083.19.camel@ganymede> <1107376999.3826.51.camel@caruso.quasi.local> <1107419058.3325.8.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:43:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1107427424.3961.0.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:43:44 -0000 On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 09:24 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think your error is due to my missing patch, but plugins are > currently broken for some reason in pwlib. > > I will make an announce here when I consider GM Opal as usable :) > Thanks, Damien. I'll be looking for it. Regards, Bruno. From kk_konrad@gmx.at Thu Feb 3 12:48:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0E53B07E0 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:48:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12728-08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:48:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D59F53B0984 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:48:27 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2005 17:48:27 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2005 18:48:27 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:48:24 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050203174824.GA6094localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:48:32 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > ...... > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? Thanks for the pointer - I was not aware of it. Today it crashed only one time... speex seems to work ok. Greeetings, Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 13:44:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0963B11E9 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:44:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16493-04 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A83E3B0B8A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.119.16]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E9FAD94 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:45:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050203174824.GA6094localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <20050203174824.GA6094localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:44:24 +0100 Message-Id: <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:44:33 -0000 Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 18:48 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > ...... > > > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > > Thanks for the pointer - I was not aware of it. Today it crashed > only one time... speex seems to work ok. > What crashed one time? > Greeetings, > > Konrad > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From gnome-Gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org Thu Feb 3 16:28:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BB73B0A4A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:28:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27375-04 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:28:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6509A3B06EE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:28:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CwoVd-00068m-S5 for Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100 Received: from 217.129.99.175 ([217.129.99.175]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100 Received: from markhellman by 217.129.99.175 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org From: Mark Hellman Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:27:41 +0000 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.129.99.175 Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss X-MailScanner-From: gnome-gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:28:19 -0000 Steve wrote: > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > know you are busy volunteers... GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 packages still are not available... On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more popular... Mark From kk_konrad@gmx.at Thu Feb 3 16:42:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5A83B07E1 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28481-06 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FA693B0B45 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:20 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2005 21:42:19 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2005 22:42:19 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:42:16 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050203214216.GA9919localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:42:23 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:44:24PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 18:48 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > > > ...... > > > > > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > > > > Thanks for the pointer - I was not aware of it. Today it crashed > > only one time... speex seems to work ok. > > > > What crashed one time? MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the windows users. GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it does not happen frequently) Greetings, Konrad From kk@verfaction.de Thu Feb 3 16:44:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C893B0D4C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28651-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F2E3B0C84 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwom9-00036z-I9 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:44:33 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwom7-0006kt-MV for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:44:31 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:44:31 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:44:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1107467071.5615.40.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:44:49 -0000 --=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark, > Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... not sure where this critisizm is being helpful, but if you want to support GnomeMeeting then you should provide binaries to Damien (or me). --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAps/vdkzt4X+wX8RAsoFAJ4qk0TzumDnfm4YU/GS3PfCh1xkIQCfcgKK DspDAnsngcv4VQ4l9s2wplY= =hYXy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-B1i9HvgbVBEQ3U38sgxz-- From craigs@postincrement.com Thu Feb 3 16:51:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E67F3B172B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29114-02 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDFE3B17A3 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.13] (rapido.southeren.com [10.0.2.13]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j13LokxB024174; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:50:47 +1100 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:50:47 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: Mark Hellman , Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-Id: <20050204083608.C98B.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:51:33 -0000 On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:27:41 +0000 Mark Hellman wrote: > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > know you are busy volunteers... > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE > 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 > packages still are not available... > > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was > released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were > made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... Let's just think about what you are saying. Skype is a company with dozens of employees, that was founded by a guy who made millions out of the Internet boom a few years ago. The company has additional venture capital funding and continues to earn revenue through the Skype-out service. They have a closed protocol, and closed source client, and they have no published schedule so they are free to change what they want, when they want to do it. GnomeMeeting is created by a team of volunteers. The people who work on it get paid nothing, it earns no revenue for them, and has no funding from anyone, other than from the very pockets of the people who work on it. GnomeMeeting is constrained by being compatible with the millions of the H.323 (and soon SIP) terminals already deployed, as well as having to work with the Gnome release schedule, and the OpenH323 release schedule. So it is no suprise that Skype can roll out stuff faster than the GnomeMeeting team. Who-da thunk.... Look at it another way. Do you think that the people that work on GnomeMeeting don't know what you are saying? Don't you think it is infinitely more frustrating for them than it could ever be for you? If you want to help address this problem, then step up to the plate and offer to create some Suse packages yourself. Or offer to test them if someone else does. But please don't make statements like this. At best, you are declaring yourself an insensitive clod. At worst, you are demotivating the very people who could solve the problem. Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 16:51:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921C93B177B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29125-03 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FA63B1765 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from 16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be (16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.119.16]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ED511BB9 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:52:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050203214216.GA9919localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <20050203214216.GA9919localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:51:18 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:51:37 -0000 Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > windows users. > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > does not happen frequently) > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 3 16:56:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477C13B0E85 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29479-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDF73B0F6B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from 16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be (16-119.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.119.16]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01BDCC03 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:57:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:56:25 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:56:26 -0000 Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:27, Mark Hellman a écrit : > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > know you are busy volunteers... > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE > 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 > packages still are not available... > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was > released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were > made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... > I shouldn't answer to such a lame email, but I will do it. We are all volunteers doing this in our spare time. If nobody is doing a SuSE 9.2 package for GnomeMeeting, don't count on me to install SuSE and create one except if you pay me. Then I might consider doing this during the night (did I forget to mention I have a paid job during the day and that I'm coding on GnomeMeeting only in my spare time?) We have the same problem with RedHat. They do not make packages for us. When 1.2.1 is released I will remove from the website the distributions from which we get no help. Ah well, and you have the sources, so you can compile yourself. Try to do this with Skype. I'm getting sick of Open Source and of e-mails like this one. I have to refrain from cancelling the whole big thing and getting a life. Good night, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From franz@iptelenet.com Thu Feb 3 17:07:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0DA3B178A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30633-01 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.iptelenet.com (sql.iptelenet.com [82.133.46.42]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E7E3B1783 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from PortegeXP by iptelenet.com (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000042636.msg for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:07:04 +0000 Message-ID: <036201c50a3c$acb4c210$3200a8c0@PortegeXP> From: "Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet)" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:06:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Authenticated-Sender: franz@iptelenet.com X-Spam-Processed: sql.iptelenet.com, Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:07:04 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.133.46.45 X-Return-Path: franz@iptelenet.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Franz J Ehrengruber \(iptelenet\)" , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:07:51 -0000 > I'm getting sick of Open Source and of e-mails like this one. I > have to refrain from cancelling the whole big thing and getting > a life. Damien, I'm sure you read Craig's response by now, regarding Skype and not surprisingly hit the neil on the head. In the long term it pays off to stick to standards. Thanks for your contribution to the open source commubity. Regards, Franz. From gnome-Gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org Thu Feb 3 19:51:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329443B1659 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:51:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07022-03 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:51:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38663B14C9 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:51:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CwrgB-0005jt-PG for Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:35 +0100 Received: from bsn-77-212-200.dsl.siol.net ([193.77.212.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:35 +0100 Received: from i_p_a_u_l by bsn-77-212-200.dsl.siol.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org From: Paul Ionescu Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:51:05 +0100 Lines: 8 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bsn-77-212-200.dsl.siol.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: gnome-gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:51:47 -0000 Hi, I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? Does it support HAL too ? Thx, From martin.lohre@web.de Thu Feb 3 20:17:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C6C3B15E1 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:17:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08948-07 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:17:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp07.web.de (smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F27C3B1773 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:17:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from [62.245.160.43] (helo=[192.168.0.72]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE 4.103 #192) id 1Cws6Z-00069c-00 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:17:52 +0100 From: Martin Lohre To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:16:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> In-Reply-To: <1107467785.2643.13.camel@linuxzone> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502040216.08937.martin.lohre@web.de> Sender: martin.lohre@web.de X-Sender: martin.lohre@web.de X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:17:54 -0000 --nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Damien, you are doing a great job here. Especially if considering that you are not= =20 doing it for money and in your spare time. As well as the other contributor= s. So thanks for writing this program, it is a nice pice of SW. Sometimes some people are just not the brightest ones. So, do not worry abo= ut=20 them and what they say, that would be just a wast of time. Martin Am Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 22:56 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Le jeu 03/02/2005 =E0 22:27, Mark Hellman a =E9crit : > > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > > know you are busy volunteers... > > > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, > > SuSE 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE > > 9.2 packages still are not available... > > > > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it > > was released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary > > were made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and mo= re > > popular... > > I shouldn't answer to such a lame email, but I will do it. > > We are all volunteers doing this in our spare time. If nobody is doing a > SuSE 9.2 package for GnomeMeeting, don't count on me to install SuSE and > create one except if you pay me. Then I might consider doing this during > the night (did I forget to mention I have a paid job during the day and > that I'm coding on GnomeMeeting only in my spare time?) > > We have the same problem with RedHat. They do not make packages for us. > When 1.2.1 is released I will remove from the website the distributions > from which we get no help. > > Ah well, and you have the sources, so you can compile yourself. Try to > do this with Skype. > > I'm getting sick of Open Source and of e-mails like this one. I have to > refrain from cancelling the whole big thing and getting a life. > > Good night, =2D-=20 Martin Lohre Konrad-Adenauer-Str. 16 D-85221 Dachau Tel.: +49-8131-617868 =46ax : +49-8131-617869 Mob.: +49-163-7130568 --nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAszYeBGwihagJ6ERAovkAJ4+hXa34XBsOMFX7//gJlCJORDKXwCgiY64 H2NpEzn1IsPHyP/OS+cCeIQ= =yYqe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1201691.8huC5DrZrz-- From conrad_b@yahoo.com Thu Feb 3 20:34:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49883B000B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09471-08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from web41521.mail.yahoo.com (web41521.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.94.128]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7D2B3B007F for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:18 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 91780 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2005 01:34:18 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=KQIlAk7sTLmWaMMTZmSw6rgkvsncjKnLsyAxap6+cvdxg+jiM9vqtyIoD6m5QVSFWdZd4UdPPX4ilDkP8jm6zR64Gx7qDsjAptVo53lB0Uhcg3gOP1fXmf7V8As4UaPEF+pgRIUfdOvKlJxImbdgnBO+Qm+hTn1oTqDFHn9AXOc= ; Message-ID: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.81.82.81] by web41521.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:34:18 CET Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:34:18 +0100 (CET) From: Conrad Beckert Subject: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:34:20 -0000 >>Try myphone.sourceforge.net?<< Well, I've installed it a while on my mother's machine - it happend to be a desaster since it caused the WinME to crash so frequently that I wasn't even able to vnc to the machine to kick it off. (MyPhone puts itself into autostart) Since then I'm to blame for each and every Windows crash on her machine :-) I contacted the author of MyPhone- he admitted some memory leak but didn't submit a patch or new version. A pity since it's a nice program. Since then I'm sticking to good old OpenPhone for my Windows buddies. (http://www.openh323.org) OpenPhone and the website too have some dark green patina but at least it works for all of us. (and nobody is trying to convince me to use Yahoo or even MSN instead of Gnomemeeting) Neosmt http://www.neosmt.com) could be an alternative. It comes with a Jabber client - with some obviously proprietary extensions for signalling. But it works perfectly without the IM (Tools/Media panel). To get into contact with Gnomemeeting, this is the only way. Neither gatekeeper settings nor the Kopete plugin work over the IM. Neither does a Jabber introduced H323 connection through (at least my) NAT. But cool, Speex works. Any other ideas for the Windows crowds? Conrad --- Damien Sandras schrieb: > Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 11:30 +0100, Konrad Karl > a écrit : > > > > > I read several times over the FAQ's and also the > instructions on the > > speexw site (link from gnomemeeting.org's FAQ). It > must be some obscure > > detail - I tried netmeeting on Win2000 and XP and > it is always the same: > > NM receives speexw 8khz but refuses to use it on > transmit. The most I > > could get from NM was MS-GSM but the sound was > horrible > > (background noise like 'grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr' all > the time besides the > > usual GSM artifacts) > > > > one detail: the codecs listed by meetspeex at > bottom do > > show up in netmeetings drop down codec list. > > > > I have no idea about this, perhaps you could try to > contact them? > > > I confess I did not even try since the 1394 device > does not show > > up as a video4linux device. Did you mean 'work out > of the box'? > > (will give it a try this evening anyways :) > Perhaps there is some > > hack required (using the v4l loopback device)? > > > > That is not a video4linux device. You have to > install a separate plugin > for this kind of camera (either the AVC or the DC > one) > > > > > The NM/GM speex issue is puzzling me most at the > moment - it > > is difficult to get everybody using linux. > > > > Try myphone.sourceforge.net? > > > An additional question: (I am almost totally > ignorant about SIP) > > > > is it possible to have two SIP devices > communicate to each other > > w/o having to use such stuff like registrar etc > (as it is possible > > now with NM/gnomemeeting by simply entering IP > address to connect? > > (assuming they are on the same network, no NAT > etc) > > > > yes you can do that. > > > > Regards, > > > > Konrad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- > _ Damien Sandras > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > v_/_ H.323 phone : > callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 03:11:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFFE3B1881 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:11:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30255-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:11:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62453B094D for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:11:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E871763D; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:13:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:11:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1107504691.3326.1.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: jpuydt@free.fr X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:11:36 -0000 Hello, There is no HAL support yet even though we are planning to work on that too (after the SIP port is complete). The DBUS component permits you to start and stop calls and to get various information about the current status. Julien can certainly tell more about it than me as he wrote that part. Our purpose is to permit integration with instant messengers, but it is still in its early stages. Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 01:51 +0100, Paul Ionescu a écrit : > Hi, > > I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? > Does it support HAL too ? > > > Thx, > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From miguelrp@gmail.com Fri Feb 4 03:14:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547503B18C2 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:14:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30516-09 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:14:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.249]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACB03B189A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:13:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so58499cwc for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=AnAWMqvTk2FofXDoIrCdwWNE6LR0ayrRSdBP2mtOriIiQVu8lZsdFt+71ZQGtiCT632Ez/GkmOWUjQS+uF0nh5HnmJeE2Dej0mSL6F87zIc1ZXGoSy9LjIB5IDBbXy+lYWNUGqRbiSXC/A5Qc1d1LTI3iVqn69UYzcK2iPOc0Aw= Received: by 10.11.99.36 with SMTP id w36mr101242cwb; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.11.99.27 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:13:27 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Rodr=EDguez_P=E9rez?= To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Rodr=EDguez_P=E9rez?= , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:14:38 -0000 No it doesn't. It would be could to make write pwlib plugins that autodetect devices based on hal information. But AFAIK there's still no reliable way in hal to detect v4l or sound decives. On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:51:05 +0100, Paul Ionescu wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? > Does it support HAL too ? > > Thx, > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 03:15:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C674A3B181B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:15:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30635-03 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:15:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214753B18BD for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:14:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7651763D for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:16:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:14:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1107504894.3326.5.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:15:43 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 02:34 +0100, Conrad Beckert a écrit : > >>Try myphone.sourceforge.net?<< > Well, I've installed it a while on my mother's machine > - it happend to be a desaster since it caused the > WinME to crash so frequently that I wasn't even able > to vnc to the machine to kick it off. (MyPhone puts > itself into autostart) Since then I'm to blame for > each and every Windows crash on her machine :-) > > I contacted the author of MyPhone- he admitted some > memory leak but didn't submit a patch or new version. > A pity since it's a nice program. > > Since then I'm sticking to good old OpenPhone for my > Windows buddies. (http://www.openh323.org) OpenPhone > and the website too have some dark green patina but at > least it works for all of us. (and nobody is trying to > convince me to use Yahoo or even MSN instead of > Gnomemeeting) > > Neosmt http://www.neosmt.com) could be an alternative. > It comes with a Jabber client - with some obviously > proprietary extensions for signalling. > > But it works perfectly without the IM (Tools/Media > panel). > > To get into contact with Gnomemeeting, this is the > only way. Neither gatekeeper settings nor the Kopete > plugin work over the IM. Neither does a Jabber > introduced H323 connection through (at least my) NAT. > > But cool, Speex works. > > Any other ideas for the Windows crowds? Find some talented and motivated hacker who can finish the windows port. I think that would be the easiest. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From alricococo@msn.com Fri Feb 4 03:16:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328A93B18A6 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:16:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30640-07 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:16:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay11-f12.bay11.hotmail.com [64.4.39.12]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1797D3B18C2 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:15:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:15:02 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 130.231.240.27 by by11fd.bay11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:14:03 GMT X-Originating-IP: [130.231.240.27] X-Originating-Email: [alricococo@msn.com] X-Sender: alricococo@msn.com From: "Jon Casasempere" To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:14:03 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2005 08:15:02.0703 (UTC) FILETIME=[A05ECBF0:01C50A91] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem with Video Tx quality X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:16:07 -0000 Hi!! I´ve just run my Gnomemeeting aplication and I have been able to make the video transmition betwen 2 laptops in a wireless LAN. The problem is that I can see the video but the quality is very bad. I think it´s not a problem with the webcam because bafore making the call the video quality is very good, but when the call is stablished I almost can´t see my shape in a green shadow. I have been changing the preference transmition setting but it´s not comming better. Could someone tell what can be the problem? Thank you in advance Jon Casasempere From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 03:41:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938B03B18AC for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:41:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32355-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975663B18B3 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D69F18644 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:43:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem with Video Tx quality From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:41:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1107506500.3326.21.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:41:42 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:14 +0100, Jon Casasempere a écrit : > Hi!! > > I´ve just run my Gnomemeeting aplication and I have been able to make the > video transmition betwen 2 laptops in a wireless LAN. The problem is that I > can see the video but the quality is very bad. I think it´s not a problem > with the webcam because bafore making the call the video quality is very > good, but when the call is stablished I almost can´t see my shape in a green > shadow. I have been changing the preference transmition setting but it´s not > comming better. > > Could someone tell what can be the problem? > > Thank you in advance > Can you upload a screenshot somewhere of the quality before transmission and after? Also, wouldn't you be using a Quickcam camera? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk Fri Feb 4 04:16:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAF63B1838 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 04:16:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02416-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 04:16:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.77]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DE553B1922 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 04:16:56 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 95471 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2005 09:16:56 -0000 Message-ID: <20050204091656.95469.qmail@web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [212.240.207.212] by web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:16:55 GMT Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:16:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Steve To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:16:59 -0000 Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, time-wasting arguments about one product/approach over another! I was just making a polite enquiry about whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. No promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone point me at some instructions? Steve Dundee, UK From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 05:25:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1183B1981 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:25:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06403-08 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:25:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A4D3B197E for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:25:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD441306A; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:26:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Damien Sandras To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204091656.95469.qmail@web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050204091656.95469.qmail@web25305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:25:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1107512711.3911.27.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:25:16 -0000 At the end of the month, we plan to release 1.2.1. I hope that we will have SuSE 9.2 packages for that moment, but I can not promise it. The person doing the packs is in exams, and SuSE is not doing them themselves. The same goes for RedHat. People are downloading packs from unknown sources on the web, they are untested, then they report crashes and problems. Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:16 +0000, Steve a écrit : > Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, > time-wasting arguments about one product/approach over > another! I was just making a polite enquiry about > whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. > > I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. No > promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone > point me at some instructions? > > Steve > Dundee, UK > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Fri Feb 4 06:06:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F1F3B06F7 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:06:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08623-02 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:06:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FBA3B0703 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:06:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cx1I4-0007kP-Vj for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:06:21 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cx1I3-00087k-4y for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:06:19 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:06:19 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:06:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1107515178.5563.37.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:06:24 -0000 --=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Conrad, > Since then I'm sticking to good old OpenPhone for my > Windows buddies. (http://www.openh323.org) OpenPhone > and the website too have some dark green patina but at > least it works for all of us. (and nobody is trying to > convince me to use Yahoo or even MSN instead of > Gnomemeeting) try openh323.sf.net or www.voxgratia.org instead. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCA1cqvdkzt4X+wX8RAkSGAJ9qIhHCx+Jc/OreVNXPaN3ulpuGOwCeKIOb x6jAQvd9tgh4z/QSiTD/tzU= =24tq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SxJXxuz6oxUknYQirItq-- From Alan.Sill@ttu.edu Fri Feb 4 06:32:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6303B1181 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09794-10 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from highenergy.phys.ttu.edu (highenergy.phys.ttu.edu [129.118.41.119]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A723D3B07F5 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (accs16-77.ttu.edu [129.118.10.221]) by highenergy.phys.ttu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104C9101AC5; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:32:04 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Message-Id: <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Alan Sill Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:32:11 -0600 To: Craig Southeren X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Mark Blake , xmeeting-ohphonex , 'Support@Codian.Com', support@codian.com, 'John Bain' , gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:32:15 -0000 Hi Craig and Damien, Was there ever a follow-up or wrapup session writeup, or conclusions=20 from this conference? In testing the openh323-based/pwlib-based=20 application ohphoneX (which is otherwise regarded as a blessing by this=20= community), a study by a serious but friendly commercial MCU vendor=20 (Codian) found the following defects, as listed below. I'd like to know whether these problems are in the openh323 or pwlib=20 layers, and thus common to GnomeMeeting, for example, or specific to=20 the otherwise very nice ohphoneX implementation. Apologies to Mark Blake for quoting his e-mail without permission, but=20= I think these are things that ought to be addressed by the ohphoneX/GM=20= developers and user community and should not have to be worked around=20 by vendors: On Jan 18, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Mark Blake wrote: > Although all the endpoint manufacturers attempt to adhere to the the=20= > various standards the quality with which they manage to do so varies=20= > tremendously from manufacturer to manufacturer. For instance of =93the=20= > big two=94 endpoint manufacturers we have seen something like 10x more=20= > bugs with one than the other. Typically these are real bugs that are=20= > not just a matter of interpretation. However there is almost always a=20= > work-around of some sort - so our code has quite a lot of stuff that=20= > attempt to detect various bugs in real time and implement=20 > work-arounds! > =A0 > > In the specific case of OhphoneX we managed to find the following=20 > major bugs / issues in only about 15 minutes of testing > > > 1) Bad H.263 bitrate advertisment > > 2) Inability to cope with some H.261 fragmented packets > > 3) Incorrect timestamps on H.261 media > > 4) H.261 encoder only uses I-macroblocks > > 5) OhphoneX does not correctly issue fast update requests in all = cases. > > So (1) is why H.263 calls do not work > > (2) is what was causing the corrupt video with H.261 but (3) would=20 > also be sufficient to cause major problems even if (2) were fixed. > > (4) is not a bug as such but means that OhphoneX is only using the=20 > most basic form of H.261 encoding which means it will need roughly 10x=20= > the bandwidth for the same quality of video compared to a =93full=94 = H.261=20 > encoder. > > (5) means that OhphoneX has poor resilience to packet loss / bad=20 > network conditions. > > =A0 > (2) and (3) are worked around in the forthcoming MCU build John=20 > previously mentioned. This is sufficient for H.261 video to work ok. > On Jan 11, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Craig Southeren wrote: > To all, > > The German Unix Users Group is holding the second annual Free > Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit n Geilenkirchen, Germany this > weekend and early next week. Myself and many other developers and = users > will be attending the event. If anyone is interested in attending, > please see the web page at: > > http://www.guug.de/veranstaltungen/telephony-summit-2005/ > > Craig > > = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org > > Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 > Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com > Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org > > Post Increment - Consulting & Services = http://www.postincrement.com > Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org > Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog =20 > http://www.southeren.com/blog > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Xmeeting-ohphonex mailing list > Xmeeting-ohphonex@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmeeting-ohphonex > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D : Alan Sill, Texas Tech University Office: Science 117, MS 41051 : : e-mail: Alan.Sill@ttu.edu ph. 806-742-3730 fax 806-742-1182 : : CDF New Office Bldg 52-102 ph. 630-840-3701 cell 806-790-7462 : =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From julien.puydt@wanadoo.fr Fri Feb 4 01:38:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1363B0A6B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:38:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24704-09 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp6.wanadoo.fr (smtp6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.25]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12E73B0957 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0606.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 376091C0028A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:38:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from hilbert.localdomain (AGrenoble-203-1-3-195.w81-49.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.49.75.195]) by mwinf0606.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E07CF1C00293 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:38:09 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050204063809919.E07CF1C00293@mwinf0606.wanadoo.fr Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dbus in gm From: Julien PUYDT To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:39:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1107499176.7141.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:04:56 -0500 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 06:38:12 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 01:51 +0100, Paul Ionescu a écrit : > I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? > Does it support HAL too ? No. It includes what is needed to direct gnomemeeting from dbus ; and mostly what is needed for IM client cooperation. Snark on #gnomemeeting From hannesf@ee.ethz.ch Fri Feb 4 06:58:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14DA3B19CE for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:58:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11365-06 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:58:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4DC3B19CB for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:57:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (tranquillity.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.222]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB142D9353; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.217]) by localhost (tranquillity [129.132.2.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22811-01-5; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (80-219-165-204.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.165.204]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F27FD932F; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:29 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Hannes Friederich Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:31 +0100 To: Alan Sill X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ee.ethz.ch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:04:56 -0500 Cc: Craig Southeren , xmeeting-ohphonex , Mark Blake , 'Support@Codian.Com', gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org, support@codian.com, 'John Bain' , Andreas Fenkart Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:58:50 -0000 To everybody Inour testing sessions at ETH Zurich with various H.323 clients, we did =20= notice that H.261 video quality was good with all tested clients when =20= doing point-point conferences. The MCU currently in use at ETH Zurich =20= is a Radvision MCU 3. When connection to this MCU, H.261 is very bad as =20= soon as there are moving frames. The problems seem to be the same as =20 the developers of Codian did point out. GnomeMeeting is also affected, so this is cleary a codec-only problem. =20= GnomeMeeting 1.2 may need some patches in order to work with most =20 Radvision-MCU connections unless these connections are 7.5fps CIF. This can be done by adjusting the H.261 Capability-Settings in both =20 ohphone/GnomeMeeting. I posted this a couple of weeks ago but didn't =20 get any answer. Andreas Fenkart did investigate the problem a bit more closely. I don't =20= recall all details, but I think it has something to do with the used =20 H.261 encoder (vic) which seems to produce only a very basic H.261. =20 Perhaps Andy can give more detailed informations - he just started a =20 new job at a company and is obviously very busy right now. On behalf of the XMeeting project, we are very interested in a good =20 H.261/H.263 solution which can handle all professional H.323-endpoints =20= correctly. For those interested: ohphoneX 0.3.3 will be released soon and will =20 improve compaibility (e.g. re-enable calls to NetMeeting) and include a =20= compatibility matrix which is supposed to be used as the start-point =20 for further improvements. The roadmap of the XMeeting project will also be updated soon. With Best Regards Hannes Friederich XMeeting/ohphoneX software engineer Am 4. Feb 2005 um 12:32 schrieb Alan Sill: > Hi Craig and Damien, > > Was there ever a follow-up or wrapup session writeup, or conclusions =20= > from this conference? In testing the openh323-based/pwlib-based =20 > application ohphoneX (which is otherwise regarded as a blessing by =20 > this community), a study by a serious but friendly commercial MCU =20 > vendor (Codian) found the following defects, as listed below. > > I'd like to know whether these problems are in the openh323 or pwlib =20= > layers, and thus common to GnomeMeeting, for example, or specific to =20= > the otherwise very nice ohphoneX implementation. > > Apologies to Mark Blake for quoting his e-mail without permission, but = =20 > I think these are things that ought to be addressed by the ohphoneX/GM = =20 > developers and user community and should not have to be worked around =20= > by vendors: > > On Jan 18, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Mark Blake wrote: > >> Although all the endpoint manufacturers attempt to adhere to the the =20= >> various standards the quality with which they manage to do so varies =20= >> tremendously from manufacturer to manufacturer. For instance of =93the = =20 >> big two=94 endpoint manufacturers we have seen something like 10x = more =20 >> bugs with one than the other. Typically these are real bugs that are =20= >> not just a matter of interpretation. However there is almost always a = =20 >> work-around of some sort - so our code has quite a lot of stuff that =20= >> attempt to detect various bugs in real time and implement =20 >> work-arounds! >> =A0 >> >> In the specific case of OhphoneX we managed to find the following =20 >> major bugs / issues in only about 15 minutes of testing >> >> >> 1) Bad H.263 bitrate advertisment >> >> 2) Inability to cope with some H.261 fragmented packets >> >> 3) Incorrect timestamps on H.261 media >> >> 4) H.261 encoder only uses I-macroblocks >> >> 5) OhphoneX does not correctly issue fast update requests in all =20 >> cases. >> >> So (1) is why H.263 calls do not work >> >> (2) is what was causing the corrupt video with H.261 but (3) would =20= >> also be sufficient to cause major problems even if (2) were fixed. >> >> (4) is not a bug as such but means that OhphoneX is only using the =20= >> most basic form of H.261 encoding which means it will need roughly =20= >> 10x the bandwidth for the same quality of video compared to a =93full=94= =20 >> H.261 encoder. >> >> (5) means that OhphoneX has poor resilience to packet loss / bad =20 >> network conditions. >> >> =A0 >> (2) and (3) are worked around in the forthcoming MCU build John =20 >> previously mentioned. This is sufficient for H.261 video to work ok. >> > > > On Jan 11, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Craig Southeren wrote: > >> To all, >> >> The German Unix Users Group is holding the second annual Free >> Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit n Geilenkirchen, Germany this >> weekend and early next week. Myself and many other developers and =20 >> users >> will be attending the event. If anyone is interested in attending, >> please see the web page at: >> >> http://www.guug.de/veranstaltungen/telephony-summit-2005/ >> >> Craig >> >> = ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20= >> - >> Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org >> >> Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 >> Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com >> Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org >> >> Post Increment - Consulting & Services =20 >> http://www.postincrement.com >> Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org >> Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog =20 >> http://www.southeren.com/blog >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >> _______________________________________________ >> Xmeeting-ohphonex mailing list >> Xmeeting-ohphonex@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmeeting-ohphonex >> >> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > : Alan Sill, Texas Tech University Office: Science 117, MS 41051 : > : e-mail: Alan.Sill@ttu.edu ph. 806-742-3730 fax 806-742-1182 : > : CDF New Office Bldg 52-102 ph. 630-840-3701 cell 806-790-7462 : > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive = Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > Xmeeting-ohphonex mailing list > Xmeeting-ohphonex@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmeeting-ohphonex > From craigs@postincrement.com Fri Feb 4 07:12:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F4B3B19D0 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:12:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12543-05 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:12:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.postincrement.net (220-244-81-10-nsw.tpgi.com.au [220.244.81.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE6E3B17AB for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:12:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.2.116] ([10.0.2.116]) by bastion.postincrement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j14CAsxB026386; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:10:54 +1100 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 23:10:56 +1100 From: Craig Southeren To: Alan Sill , "'John Bain'" , "'Support@Codian.Com'" , gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org, Mark Blake , xmeeting-ohphonex In-Reply-To: <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Message-Id: <20050204223500.0295.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:12:24 -0000 On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:32:11 -0600 Alan Sill wrote: > Hi Craig and Damien, > > Was there ever a follow-up or wrapup session writeup, or conclusions > from this conference? Several of the speakers provided copies of their presentations, but there was no formal publication produced. We intend to create such a publication next year. Links to my presentations can be found in my blog at: http://www.southeren.com/blog/archives/000104.html > In testing the openh323-based/pwlib-based > application ohphoneX (which is otherwise regarded as a blessing by this > community), a study by a serious but friendly commercial MCU vendor > (Codian) found the following defects, as listed below. I commented on these issues briefly on the OpenH323 list, but this was about the time the OpenH323 list server went offline and it appears that post never made it to the list. In essence, I agree that all of these observations are probably correct, but I am not able to spend the time required to fix them. I imagine Damien is in the same position. > I'd like to know whether these problems are in the openh323 or pwlib > layers, and thus common to GnomeMeeting, for example, or specific to > the otherwise very nice ohphoneX implementation. These issues are all probably in OpenH323 > Apologies to Mark Blake for quoting his e-mail without permission, but > I think these are things that ought to be addressed by the ohphoneX/GM > developers and user community and should not have to be worked around > by vendors: I'm uncomfortable with the language you are using here. The phrase "ought to be addressed" seems to imply an imperative that is inappplicable to an Open Source project consisting of volunteers who donate their time and expertise. We are driven by the need to "scratch" our personal itches, not to ensure compatibility with commercial products from any vendor. I agree it would be nice if these problems were fixed, but the reality is that this will require someone with both the knowledge and motivation to do so. So far, nobody has stepped forward. It occurs to me that the vendors to whom you refer have both the knowledge and the motivation. Perhaps they can use some of the revenue obtained from interoperating with our Open Source software to fund the developement of a solution to the problem they have discovered ? :) Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren craigs@postincrement.com / craigs@voxgratia.org Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs@jabber.voxgratia.org Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 4 07:33:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EBF3B0A42 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:33:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13588-10 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:33:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E6D3B0837 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:33:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE2C18AD1; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:35:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [Xmeeting-ohphonex] Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit in Germany From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050112110049.6475.CRAIGS@postincrement.com> <6969E2D2-76A0-11D9-B21F-000A95CA4F5C@ttu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:33:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1107520436.3911.54.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Mark Blake , Alan Sill , xmeeting-ohphonex , 'Support@Codian.Com', Craig Southeren , support@codian.com, 'John Bain' , Andreas Fenkart X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:33:59 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 12:57 +0100, Hannes Friederich a écrit : > To everybody > > Inour testing sessions at ETH Zurich with various H.323 clients, we did > notice that H.261 video quality was good with all tested clients when > doing point-point conferences. The MCU currently in use at ETH Zurich > is a Radvision MCU 3. When connection to this MCU, H.261 is very bad as > soon as there are moving frames. The problems seem to be the same as > the developers of Codian did point out. > GnomeMeeting is also affected, so this is cleary a codec-only problem. > GnomeMeeting 1.2 may need some patches in order to work with most > Radvision-MCU connections unless these connections are 7.5fps CIF. > This can be done by adjusting the H.261 Capability-Settings in both > ohphone/GnomeMeeting. I posted this a couple of weeks ago but didn't > get any answer. > I don't remember having received that email and I don't find it in my archive. Can you send me the mail again so that it can be fixed in 1.2.1? Thank you, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 4 10:52:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE623B099A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:52:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24376-10 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:52:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E733B0A09 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:52:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:22:47 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020421224601136 ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:22:46 +0530 Message-ID: <000e01c50ad1$85fadca0$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:22:26 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2005 15:52:47.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[92841720:01C50AD1] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: openh323@openh323.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:52:29 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hello All, I want to know about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I = want to know about the performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large = no of endpoints. Well if anyone is having some test results then please = let me know because I require for the proof of concept of my project on = OpenH323 with OpenMCU. Thanks and regards, A.Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hello All,
 
       I = want to know=20 about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I want to know about = the=20 performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large no of endpoints. Well = if anyone=20 is having some test results then please let me know because I require = for the=20 proof of concept of my project on OpenH323 with OpenMCU.
 
Thanks and regards,
A.Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C50AFF.9F968FF0-- From brrhtz@yahoo.de Fri Feb 4 12:14:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D243B0799 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:14:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29478-08 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:14:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.34]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B68E3B0775 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:14:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2005 17:14:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Windows Clients For Speex with Gnomemeeting - Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050204013418.91778.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:14:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1107537242.4017.30.camel@caruso.quasi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:14:03 -0000 On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 02:34 +0100, Conrad Beckert wrote: > Any other ideas for the Windows crowds? Not really. I had the same problem a couple of months ago, when I tried to setup video calls with my friends and family. I couldn't get speex to work with netmeeting, and of course NAT and dynamic ip's are an obstacle too. The H323 client situation on windows seems to be lacking, while on the other hand SIP is well supported (Windows Messenger, XLite, SJPhone ...). Unfortunately though, the Linux SIP clients are somewhat lacking on their side, linphone isn't that good, SJPhone for Linux has no dialpad and XLite for Linux is only in it's beta stage. What I'm currently doing is having an asterisk server on my home LAN and translating H323 calls into SIP. I.e. H323 SIP Gnomemeeting <-> asterisk <-> NAT <-> Internet (register on FWD or sth.) and it works reasonable well, where the SIP connections work at least with GSM and iLBC (didn't try speex yet). When Gnomemeeting SIP support is available, the situation should generally become better regarding Windows interoperability, for voice only calls at least. Regards, Bruno. From steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk Fri Feb 4 13:05:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDE33B09A1 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:05:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32016-06 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:05:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.78]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DF433B08CD for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:05:16 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 16802 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2005 18:05:16 -0000 Message-ID: <20050204180516.16800.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [82.41.115.123] by web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:05:15 GMT Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 18:05:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Steve Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1107512711.3911.27.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:05:20 -0000 Damien That's good news! The offer still stands though, if the person does not have time. Steve Dundee, UK --- Damien Sandras wrote: > At the end of the month, we plan to release 1.2.1. I > hope that we will > have SuSE 9.2 packages for that moment, but I can > not promise it. > > The person doing the packs is in exams, and SuSE is > not doing them > themselves. The same goes for RedHat. People are > downloading packs from > unknown sources on the web, they are untested, then > they report crashes > and problems. > > Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:16 +0000, Steve a > écrit : > > Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, > > time-wasting arguments about one product/approach > over > > another! I was just making a polite enquiry about > > whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. > > > > I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. > No > > promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone > > point me at some instructions? > > > > Steve > > Dundee, UK > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- > _ Damien Sandras > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > v_/_ H.323 phone : > callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > From cmor7763@alu-etsetb.upc.es Fri Feb 4 16:20:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288A73B168C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:20:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11372-01 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:20:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from gehry.upc.es (gehry.upc.es [147.83.2.21]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596873B1866 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:20:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from gehry.upc.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j14LJEFk021042 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:20:36 +0100 Received: from ackerman.upc.es (ackerman.upcnetadm.upcnet.es [147.83.2.243]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j14LHa5Y020815 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:17:36 +0100 Received: from [172.26.0.2] ([80.25.169.49]) by ackerman.upc.es (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2005020422173508:16721 ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4203E79F.5020101@alu-etsetb.upc.es> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 22:22:39 +0100 From: Christian Morales Vega User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: es-es, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Wideband CODECs? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 04/02/2005 22:17:35, Serialize by Router on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 04/02/2005 22:17:36, Serialize complete at 04/02/2005 22:17:36 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:20:40 -0000 Skype users say me they have better audio quality thanks to the use of iSAC, a wideband CODEC. Exist the possibility to use this CODEC with Gnomemeeting? Perhaps another one? Why Speex is limited to narrowband in Gnomemeeting? Thx. From derek@indranet.co.nz Fri Feb 4 16:26:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66673B178B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:26:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11534-07 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:26:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from enso.acheron.indranet.co.nz (unknown [203.167.203.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3D23B0B68 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:26:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from kauri (kauri.acheron.indranet.co.nz [192.168.1.109]) by enso.acheron.indranet.co.nz (8.9.3-20030919/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29668; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:26:02 +1300 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:26:02 +1300 (NZDT) From: Derek Smithies X-X-Sender: derek@kauri.acheron.indranet.co.nz To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability In-Reply-To: <000e01c50ad1$85fadca0$1970640a@Samyak.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: openh323@openh323.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:26:07 -0000 Hi, I have heard rumours of 70-80 concurrent calls to openmcu. You could have found this information from perusing the openh323 mail lists with a search tool. Derek. On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, asharma wrote: > hello All, > > I want to know about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I > want to know about the performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large > no of endpoints. Well if anyone is having some test results then please > let me know because I require for the proof of concept of my project on > OpenH323 with OpenMCU. > > Thanks and regards, > A.Sharma -- Derek Smithies Ph.D. This PC runs pine on linux for email IndraNet Technologies Ltd. If you find a virus apparently from me, it has Email: derek@indranet.co.nz forged the e-mail headers on someone else's machine ph +64 3 365 6485 Please do not notify me when (apparently) receiving a Web: http://www.indranet-technologies.com/ windows virus from me...... From gnome-Gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org Fri Feb 4 19:36:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38043B0777 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:36:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21582-02 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:36:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EB53B068E for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:36:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CxDvJ-0005H4-5m for Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:35:41 +0100 Received: from home-33027.b.astral.ro ([81.89.4.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:35:41 +0100 Received: from i_p_a_u_l by home-33027.b.astral.ro with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:35:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org From: Paul Ionescu Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 02:36:19 +0200 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <1107499176.7141.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: home-33027.b.astral.ro User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: gnome-gnomemeeting-list@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: Gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: dbus in gm X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:36:37 -0000 OK, Thanks for the info. On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:39:36 +0100, Julien PUYDT wrote: > Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 01:51 +0100, Paul Ionescu a écrit : >> I am curious what dbus functionality is included in GM ? Does it support >> HAL too ? > > No. It includes what is needed to direct gnomemeeting from dbus ; and > mostly what is needed for IM client cooperation. > > Snark on #gnomemeeting From asharma@samyak.com Sat Feb 5 00:24:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CA13B0707 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:24:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02217-02 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:24:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6203B0858 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:24:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:54:35 +0530 Received: (from sipl25 [10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005020510543506673 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 10:54:35 +0530 Message-ID: <001101c50b42$edd1bda0$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:54:12 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2005 05:24:35.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB232A20:01C50B42] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 05:24:12 -0000 hi, thanks, but I just want to know whether if anybody has used OpenMCU and what were the results. Actually I read some statements like OpenMCU is not suitable as a product. But this was the infornmation from the forums 3 years back. Actually I want to know whether is OpenMCU suitable for large scale applications or if is there any other MCU available which is OpenSource and is better than OpenMCU and is readily available. Thanks, A. Sharma ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek Smithies" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 2:56 AM Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenMCU Scalability > Hi, > I have heard rumours of 70-80 concurrent calls to openmcu. > > > You could have found this information from perusing the openh323 mail > lists with a search tool. > > Derek. > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, asharma wrote: > > > hello All, > > > > I want to know about the threading mechanism in OpenMCU because I > > want to know about the performance of OpenMCU when connected to a large > > no of endpoints. Well if anyone is having some test results then please > > let me know because I require for the proof of concept of my project on > > OpenH323 with OpenMCU. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > A.Sharma > > -- > Derek Smithies Ph.D. This PC runs pine on linux for email > IndraNet Technologies Ltd. If you find a virus apparently from me, it has > Email: derek@indranet.co.nz forged the e-mail headers on someone else's machine > ph +64 3 365 6485 Please do not notify me when (apparently) receiving a > Web: http://www.indranet-technologies.com/ windows virus from me...... > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > From dsandras@seconix.com Sat Feb 5 08:14:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7863B07B4 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:14:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22259-05 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:14:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C3A3B08D1 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:14:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.123.100] (31.210-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.210.31]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9908118F97; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:16:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Damien Sandras To: steveoldmanse-gnomemeeting@yahoo.co.uk, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050204180516.16800.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050204180516.16800.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:14:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1107609274.3193.6.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: kk@verfaction.de X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:14:36 -0000 We have had a contribution for the packages. Kilian will confirm when they are ok because we know there is a bug in the gcc from SuSE. Kilian will send a mail when we can confirm they are ready :) Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 18:05 +0000, Steve a écrit : > Damien > > That's good news! The offer still stands though, if > the person does not have time. > > Steve > Dundee, UK > > --- Damien Sandras wrote: > > At the end of the month, we plan to release 1.2.1. I > > hope that we will > > have SuSE 9.2 packages for that moment, but I can > > not promise it. > > > > The person doing the packs is in exams, and SuSE is > > not doing them > > themselves. The same goes for RedHat. People are > > downloading packs from > > unknown sources on the web, they are untested, then > > they report crashes > > and problems. > > > > Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 09:16 +0000, Steve a > > écrit : > > > Oh no! I didn't mean to trigger pointless, > > > time-wasting arguments about one product/approach > > over > > > another! I was just making a polite enquiry about > > > whether Suse 9.2 packages could be coming. > > > > > > I'm happy to have a go at building a Suse 9.2 rpm. > > No > > > promises that I will succeed, mind... Can someone > > > point me at some instructions? > > > > > > Steve > > > Dundee, UK > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > -- > > _ Damien Sandras > > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > > v_/_ H.323 phone : > > callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Sat Feb 5 08:17:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5A43B07A0 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:17:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22461-02 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168073B07B4 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.123.100] (31.210-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.210.31]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CE918F97 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:19:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Wideband CODECs? From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <4203E79F.5020101@alu-etsetb.upc.es> References: <4203E79F.5020101@alu-etsetb.upc.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:17:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1107609467.3193.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:17:47 -0000 Le vendredi 04 février 2005 à 22:22 +0100, Christian Morales Vega a écrit : > Skype users say me they have better audio quality thanks to the use of > iSAC, a wideband CODEC. > Exist the possibility to use this CODEC with Gnomemeeting? Perhaps > another one? Why Speex is limited to narrowband in Gnomemeeting? > If you are using CVS version of GnomeMeeting with CVS version of Openh323 you can use the Speex Wideband codec. It is not in 1.2.0 and won't be in 1.2.1 because it requires GUI changes: users will think we only provide Speex support as there are so many versions available :) In 2.00 you will have speex wideband support :) About iSAC, I think it is a commercial codec. I would say quality is good with Skype because it is audio-only. If you use audio-only with GnomeMeeting and a codec without compression like G.711 you will have *better* quality than with Skype, and less latency as you don't have an intermediary endpoint to route the streams like it is the case with Skype. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sun Feb 6 12:15:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7F93B087F for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12377-07 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50A93B0701 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2f9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.47.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cxq0O-0007BQ-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:15:29 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cxq0N-0007VK-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:15:27 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:15:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:15:33 -0000 Hello, I am looking for a gnomemmeeting setup for my environment and just started with VOIP. I have in mind several options, but I am not sure, which one is the most promissing one to follow....and most likely there are much smarter and better ones. If this is the wrong list, please let me know, if you know a more appropriate one. Here is my environment: I have an H323 gateway or proxy (Cisco proxy?) which is not under my control and where I can register one fixed IP address for my number. When I run gnomemeeting on my workstation and enter there under Edit/Preferences/H323 Settings/Gateway/Proxy Settings everything works. Nothing else to setup, no authentication etc. I dial h323: to call and receive calls when my number is dialed. When I am away from my workstation, I would like to call and receive calls on a laptop with dynamic DNS (running gnomemeeting). I have full control over the laptop. The workstation is still up and running, i.e. I can use it to forward or redirect calls. I am wondering, what you think about these options (or if you have better ones): 1) My assumption here is that ports 1718-1720 are used for the communication with the Cisco proxy (that is what I have seen with ohphone): Use my workstation to forward all openh323 communication from Cisco proxy to laptop and visa versa. Forward the ports 1719 and 1718 from the workstation to the laptop using an ssh tunnel: laptop$ ssh -A -R 1718:laptop:1718 -l rdorsch -N workstation Then I would need to forward all packets to port 1720 of the workstation to the Cisco proxy. Note that the workstation is not doing NAT for the laptop, so doing this might be not trivial. 2) Setup gnu gatekeeper at my workstation as proxy and let it forward all calls to and from the cisco proxy. Can gnu gatekeeper do this? I saw that I can setup gnu gatekeeper as proxy, but can gnu gatekeeper use the Cisco proxy itself? 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from the laptop to the Cisco proxy. 4) I think X and/or KDE habe options to forward sound. I could experiment with these, but I think VOIP developed for a good reason their own codecs ;-) Any comments or hints are welcome. Many thanks. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Sun Feb 6 12:30:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30313B09B5 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:30:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13212-10 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:30:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EAD3B0995 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:30:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (188-91.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.91.188]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84070648C for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:32:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:30:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:30:13 -0000 Hello, Le dimanche 06 février 2005 à 18:15 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hello, > > I am looking for a gnomemmeeting setup for my environment and just started > with VOIP. I have in mind several options, but I am not sure, which one is > the most promissing one to follow....and most likely there are much smarter > and better ones. > > If this is the wrong list, please let me know, if you know a more appropriate > one. > It should be the right list :) > Here is my environment: > I have an H323 gateway or proxy (Cisco proxy?) which is not under my control > and where I can register one fixed IP address for my number. When I run > gnomemeeting on my workstation and enter there under Edit/Preferences/H323 > Settings/Gateway/Proxy Settings everything works. Nothing else to setup, no > authentication etc. I dial h323: to call and receive calls when my > number is dialed. > Great. > When I am away from my workstation, I would like to call and receive calls on > a laptop with dynamic DNS (running gnomemeeting). I have full control over the > laptop. The workstation is still up and running, i.e. I can use it to forward > or redirect calls. > > I am wondering, what you think about these options (or if you have better > ones): > > 1) My assumption here is that ports 1718-1720 are used for the communication > with the Cisco proxy (that is what I have seen with ohphone): > > Use my workstation to forward all openh323 communication from Cisco proxy to > laptop and visa versa. > > Forward the ports 1719 and 1718 from the workstation to the laptop using an > ssh tunnel: > > laptop$ ssh -A -R 1718:laptop:1718 -l rdorsch -N workstation > > Then I would need to forward all packets to port 1720 of the workstation to > the Cisco proxy. Note that the workstation is not doing NAT for the laptop, > so doing this might be not trivial. > I'm not sure, but isn't there a possible problem for RTP? > 2) Setup gnu gatekeeper at my workstation as proxy and let it forward all > calls to and from the cisco proxy. Can gnu gatekeeper do this? I saw that I > can setup gnu gatekeeper as proxy, but can gnu gatekeeper use the Cisco proxy > itself? > Yes, I think so. I'm not a GNU GK expert, but I think it can do that for what I remember from its configuration. > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls on > my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from the > laptop to the Cisco proxy. > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. > 4) I think X and/or KDE habe options to forward sound. I could experiment with > these, but I think VOIP developed for a good reason their own codecs ;-) > Indeed. > Any comments or hints are welcome. > I think I would go for the Gatekeeper option. That is the easiest. You can forward incoming calls from the gateway to the workstation to your laptop without a problem. But I'm not sure outgoing calls will work, the gateway will most probably reject calls coming from your laptop, in that case, you will have to proxy things from inside the LAN. GNU GK seems the best way to do this. > Many thanks. > Rainer > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sun Feb 6 13:32:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3968C3B0767 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:32:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16968-04 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:32:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CED3B0995 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:32:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2f9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.47.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxrDI-0007K9-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:32:53 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxrDH-0007y4-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:32:51 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:32:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:32:55 -0000 Hello Damien, thanks for you immediate reply. I am going for the gatekeeper option. But since gnomemeeting call forwarding seems to be a lot easier, I guess, I would setup this one as a temporary (one way) solution. Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 18:30 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls > > on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from > > the laptop to the Cisco proxy. > > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, > that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be > possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. Hmm...how do I tell the gnomemeeting on my workstation the dynamic IP address, I get on my laptop (assuming that I have no physical access to the workstation in that moment)? Can I edit the configuration file and start gnomemeeting in a non-gui mode? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Sun Feb 6 13:46:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E073B0D5F for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:46:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17736-03 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:46:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE3C3B0D57 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:45:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (188-91.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.91.188]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9190129D3 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:48:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107711011.3222.8.camel@golgoth01> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:45:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:46:01 -0000 Hello, Le dimanche 06 février 2005 à 19:32 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hello Damien, > > thanks for you immediate reply. I am going for the gatekeeper option. But > since gnomemeeting call forwarding seems to be a lot easier, I guess, I would > setup this one as a temporary (one way) solution. > Probably the best idea! > Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 18:30 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive calls > > > on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward calls from > > > the laptop to the Cisco proxy. > > > > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, > > that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be > > possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. > > Hmm...how do I tell the gnomemeeting on my workstation the dynamic IP address, > I get on my laptop (assuming that I have no physical access to the > workstation in that moment)? Can I edit the configuration file and start > gnomemeeting in a non-gui mode? > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : gconftool-2 --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host 111.222.333.444 --type=string For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into account immediately. Another possibility would be to signup for a free dynamic DNS account : http://www.dyndns.org and use the dynamic DNS name. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sun Feb 6 15:55:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A1B3B06AC for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:55:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24397-09 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:55:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832C23B0907 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:54:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2f9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.47.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxtQn-0007Z3-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:54:57 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxtQm-0000wy-00 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:54:56 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:54:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502062154.55342.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:55:08 -0000 Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 19:45 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > gconftool-2 > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > 111.222.333.444 --type=string Debian has 1.0 in its testing and unstable branch, 1.2 is only in experimental: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnomemeeting.html I guess I most likely need $ gconftool-2 --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/always_forward true --type=bool (and switching it off again) Do you see anything which should make me upgrading to 1.2 ASAP. Switching to the experimental package means loosing all kind of security updates, etc. > > For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into > account immediately. Very cool! Just noticed that this also works for 1.0 > Another possibility would be to signup for a free dynamic DNS account : > http://www.dyndns.org and use the dynamic DNS name. Agreed. As mentioned above, I probably need to switch off and on forwarding. Many thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sun Feb 6 15:59:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB4B3B0AC5 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:59:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24696-06 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:59:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E36E3B0957 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:59:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CxtUq-0005L8-Ll for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:59:08 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CxtUo-00015j-Q5 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:59:06 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:59:06 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502062154.55342.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> <200502062154.55342.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26" Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:59:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1107723546.5751.38.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:59:12 -0000 --=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, > Do you see anything which should make me upgrading to 1.2 ASAP. Switching= to=20 > the experimental package means loosing all kind of security updates, etc. for now using the 1.2 debs is ok, as they should be security-safe (and only force new versions of pwlib and openh323 out of experimental). Thus the impact is quite limited. But you're free to wait until we'll move the whole tree dependant on new pwlib/openh323 to unstable. That should not take too long most probably. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCBoUavdkzt4X+wX8RAiLSAJ9OccYzwG/cjgjDpB+/p6xpF/IPhgCdHLXL ysTy7YwDmF7viepcIasAfU4= =IMDM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8LznJFzrcExxRYr7ji26-- From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 7 04:27:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B4E3B0859 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:27:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29728-02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:27:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9373B0653 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:27:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl25 ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:14 +0530 Message-ID: <013101c50cf7$4c9efb30$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:57:51 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2005 09:28:14.0718 (UTC) FILETIME=[597459E0:01C50CF7] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Bandwidth Control at Source X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:27:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Does any one have used Quicknet Line Jack and Phone Jack cards = under Linux? I want to know whether the bandwidth control is possible at = the source (h/w) level in Quicknet cards. Also whether the same is possible for any MPEG-4 cards which supports = H.263 codec.? I am also not knowing about any of MPEG-4 PCI based card , = supported under Linux and does support H.263. I need this info for my project. Regards, A bend in the road is not the end of = the road..Unless you fail to make the turn=20 =20 Ashutosh J Sharma Software Engineer Samyak Infotech Pvt. Ltd. 905-908, Abhijeet, Mithakhali six roads. Ellisbridge Ahmedabad-380 006 =20 asharma@samyak.com tel:=20 tel2: mobile: 91 (79) 26465758 91 (79) 55315021 91 9898487939 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 Add me to your address book... Want a signature like this?=20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
 
     Does any one = have used=20 Quicknet Line Jack and Phone Jack cards under Linux? I want to know = whether the=20 bandwidth control is possible at the source (h/w) level in Quicknet=20 cards.
Also whether the same is possible for = any MPEG-4=20 cards which supports H.263 codec.? I am also not knowing about any of = MPEG-4 PCI=20 based card , supported under Linux and does support H.263.
I need this info for my = project.
 
Regards, A bend in the road is not the end of = the=20 road..Unless you fail to make the=20 turn
Ashutosh J = Sharma
Software=20 Engineer 		Samyak Infotech Pvt. = Ltd.
905-908,=20 Abhijeet, Mithakhali six=20 roads.
Ellisbridge
Ahmedabad-380 006 =
asharma@samyak.com
tel:=20
tel2:
mobile: 		91 (79) 26465758
91 (79)=20 55315021
91 9898487939=20 =
Add me to your address = book... Want a signature like=20 = this?
------=_NextPart_000_012E_01C50D25.656FE470-- From devel@tootai.net Mon Feb 7 06:16:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C7A3B1037 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:16:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02843-06 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:16:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mango.tootai.net (mango.tootai.net [217.11.129.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B673A3B0F4D for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:16:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (rob67-1-82-231-69-24.fbx.proxad.net [82.231.69.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by mango.tootai.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id j17BG5qI009784 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:16:06 +0100 Message-ID: <42074F20.8080807@tootai.net> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:21:04 +0100 From: daniel huhardeaux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gnomemeeting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Call numbering problem X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:16:16 -0000 Hi list, I face a strange problem: on each digit or letter from the number I want to call, when I enter it, the call is started. If I enter them very quickly, it happends each 2~3 digit. The same when I use backspace to correct or modify a number. No feature is set in preferences. DTMF is set to all. Any idea? GM 1.2.0 - 20041221 Debian SID kernel 2.6.10 with patch (swsuspend) Thanks -- Daniel Huhardeaux ______ _____ _____ ______ ______ __ enum +48 32 285 5276 /_ _// _ // _ //_ _// __ // / IAX FWD +1 7009 422493 / / / // // // / / / / /_/ // / sip:101 h323:121 @voip./_/ /____//____/ /_/ /_/ /_//_/.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 06:24:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDD93B1053 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:24:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03467-01 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:24:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25853B1035 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:24:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F29818C3C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:26:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Call numbering problem From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42074F20.8080807@tootai.net> References: <42074F20.8080807@tootai.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:24:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1107775475.29230.8.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:24:39 -0000 Hi, Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 12:21 +0100, daniel huhardeaux a écrit : > Hi list, > > I face a strange problem: on each digit or letter from the number I want > to call, when I enter it, the call is started. If I enter them very > quickly, it happends each 2~3 digit. The same when I use backspace to > correct or modify a number. No feature is set in preferences. DTMF is > set to all. > > Any idea? GM 1.2.0 - 20041221 Debian SID kernel 2.6.10 with patch > (swsuspend) > You are probably running GTK+ 2.6, they have changed something and now a callback that was only triggered when selecting something in the url's history is triggered for each key stroke. That bug is fixed in CVS and will disappear as soon as you will upgrade, ie as soon as our CVS packs are again built nightly. Kilian will most probably build new packs against the Mimas release of OpenH323 and PWLib for the 1.2.1 release shortly. > Thanks -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Mon Feb 7 12:37:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC3E3B11A0 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:37:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28417-02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:37:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 847B83B117B for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:37:36 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Feb 2005 17:37:35 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 07 Feb 2005 18:37:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:37:32 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050207173732.GA14125localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:37:38 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > > windows users. > > > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > > does not happen frequently) > > > > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. > -- > _ Damien Sandras > ........ Is this good enough? Konrad PS: ieee1394 is not working very stable with the current FC3 kernel but I have found an old bt848 card which works quite well. ========================================= gnomemeeting Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x71f9)! Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnomemeeting' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] [New Thread 108714928 (LWP 10974)] [New Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)] [New Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)] [New Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)] [New Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)] [New Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)] 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0x0092ff92 in _XEnq () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #3 0x0093036e in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #4 0x009314cb in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #5 0x0092d700 in XTranslateCoordinates () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #6 0x0056241d in gdk_window_get_origin () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #7 0x003e9b52 in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #8 0x003e9d9d in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #9 0x00c25368 in g_main_context_wakeup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #10 0x00c227bb in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #11 0x00c24242 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #12 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #13 0x0033a07e in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #14 0x0809df61 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfefaec4, envp=0xfffffdfe) at main_window.cpp:4271 Thread 8 (Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x009cbb46 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #2 0x0103b9a8 in PSyncPoint::Wait () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #3 0x02578776 in H323ConnectionsCleaner::Main () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.15.2 No symbol table info available. #4 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 7 (Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x01038e62 in PHouseKeepingThread::Main () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #3 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 No symbol table info available. #4 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #5 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 6 (Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x050777d8 in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 No symbol table info available. #3 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 No symbol table info available. #4 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 No symbol table info available. #5 0x0810c3b0 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #6 0x040f33d8 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #7 0x080c7398 in GMZeroconfBrowser::Main (this=0x8118c60) at gm_contacts-zeroconf.cpp:537 m = {semaphore = @0x83f0067} #8 0x008b9bb0 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #9 0x00000000 in ?? () No symbol table info available. Thread 5 (Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #4 0x04ef6d1c in e_book_set_default_source () from /usr/lib/libebook.so.8 No symbol table info available. #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 4 (Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)): #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #4 0x0073fbff in link_thread_io_context () from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #5 0x00c791a4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x05dac458 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #7 0x00c3c8d2 in g_static_private_free () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #8 0x00000001 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #9 0x00000021 in ?? () No symbol table info available. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 13:04:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFA93B119C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:04:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30387-08 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:04:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50383B11D1 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:04:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (165-83.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.83.165]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC617A85A for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:07:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050207173732.GA14125localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <20050207173732.GA14125localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:04:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:04:55 -0000 Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 18:37 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > > > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > > > windows users. > > > > > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > > > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > > > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > > > does not happen frequently) > > > > > > > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. > > -- > > _ Damien Sandras > > ........ > > > Is this good enough? > Unfortunately not... :( Can you tell us when it is crashing? Is it random? > Konrad > > PS: ieee1394 is not working very stable with the current > FC3 kernel but I have found an old bt848 card which works > quite well. > > ========================================= > > gnomemeeting > Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x71f9)! > > Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnomemeeting' > > Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] > [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] > [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 10950)] > [New Thread 133954480 (LWP 10975)] > [New Thread 108714928 (LWP 10974)] > [New Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)] > [New Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)] > [New Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)] > [New Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)] > [New Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)] > 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #2 0x0092ff92 in _XEnq () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #3 0x0093036e in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #4 0x009314cb in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #5 0x0092d700 in XTranslateCoordinates () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > #6 0x0056241d in gdk_window_get_origin () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #7 0x003e9b52 in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #8 0x003e9d9d in gtk_tooltips_disable () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #9 0x00c25368 in g_main_context_wakeup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #10 0x00c227bb in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #11 0x00c24242 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #12 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #13 0x0033a07e in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #14 0x0809df61 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfefaec4, envp=0xfffffdfe) at main_window.cpp:4271 > > Thread 8 (Thread 28781488 (LWP 10953)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x009cbb46 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x0103b9a8 in PSyncPoint::Wait () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x02578776 in H323ConnectionsCleaner::Main () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.15.2 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 7 (Thread 123464624 (LWP 10956)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x01038e62 in PHouseKeepingThread::Main () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x0103a31a in PThread::PX_ThreadStart () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 6 (Thread 68107184 (LWP 10961)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x008515c1 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x050777d8 in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x0810c3b0 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x040f33d8 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #7 0x080c7398 in GMZeroconfBrowser::Main (this=0x8118c60) at gm_contacts-zeroconf.cpp:537 > m = {semaphore = @0x83f0067} > #8 0x008b9bb0 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #9 0x00000000 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 5 (Thread 78597040 (LWP 10962)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x04ef6d1c in e_book_set_default_source () from /usr/lib/libebook.so.8 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x009c93ae in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x00858b6e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > > Thread 4 (Thread 98225072 (LWP 10966)): > #0 0x007757a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x0084ef74 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x00c241d3 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x00c244ef in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #4 0x0073fbff in link_thread_io_context () from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #5 0x00c791a4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #6 0x05dac458 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #7 0x00c3c8d2 in g_static_private_free () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > No symbol table info available. > #8 0x00000001 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #9 0x00000021 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Mon Feb 7 13:20:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330F03B06F9 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31453-07 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:19:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09E003B123C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:19:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Feb 2005 18:19:28 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 07 Feb 2005 19:19:28 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:19:21 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050207181921.GA14933localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:20:00 -0000 On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:04:53PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 18:37 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Le jeu 03/02/2005 à 22:42, Konrad Karl a écrit : > > > > > > > MyPhone. I played around with video and audio settings - it happened > > > > one time so far. ilbc sounds quite fine - will recommend it to the > > > > windows users. > > > > > > > > GM on Fedora 3 (downloaded from http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-3-i386/) > > > > crashes occasionally (dont remember exactly, some x messages out > > > > of sync or so - i will provide more details but not this week, it > > > > does not happen frequently) > > > > > > > > > > Try to provide a full backtrace or it will be of no help. > > > -- > > > _ Damien Sandras > > > ........ > > > > > > Is this good enough? > > > > Unfortunately not... :( > > Can you tell us when it is crashing? Is it random? > To me it looks like random for now. I am trying to figure out how to reproduce it but for now I have not detected a pattern. (will try with speek 8k only and no video). Counterpart is Windows XP with MyPhone, speex 8k and no video too. it even happened immediately after startup. I was still able to continue voice conversation and if I remember correctly also video was still fine .... Greetings, Konrad. From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Mon Feb 7 14:53:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CCF3B0F1C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:53:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05023-06 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:53:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5FF3B0AC4 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:53:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from j2a9d.j.pppool.de ([85.74.42.157] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CyEwn-0001id-00 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:53:25 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CyEwm-0004EX-00 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:53:24 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:53:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:53:33 -0000 Damien, Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 19:45 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 18:30 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > > 3) Use call forwarding of gnomemeeting on my workstation to receive > > > > calls on my laptop. Not sure if that works and how I would forward > > > > calls from the laptop to the Cisco proxy. > > > > > > Forwarding calls from the workstation to the laptop will be possible, > > > that's standard H.323 call forwarding. The reverse should also be > > > possible, but I don't know what the restrictions for the proxy will be. > > > > Hmm...how do I tell the gnomemeeting on my workstation the dynamic IP > > address, I get on my laptop (assuming that I have no physical access to > > the workstation in that moment)? Can I edit the configuration file and > > start gnomemeeting in a non-gui mode? > > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > gconftool-2 > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > 111.222.333.444 --type=string I did that now on the workstation machine and veryfied the settings with gconftool-2 --set ... But I do not receive anything on my laptop machine. Does gnomemeeting write a logfile which I could check? > > For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into > account immediately. > As mentioned before, I am running 1.0.2. The gconftool-2 changes take effect in the preferences box. Is that sufficient to be sure that the changes are effective? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 14:58:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9953B0933 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05237-01 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873D83B0AA1 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:58:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (165-83.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.83.165]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED79123FF for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:00:17 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050207181921.GA14933localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <20050207181921.GA14933localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:58:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:58:06 -0000 Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 19:19 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > To me it looks like random for now. I am trying to figure out how to > reproduce it but for now I have not detected a pattern. > (will try with speek 8k only and no video). Counterpart is > Windows XP with MyPhone, speex 8k and no video too. > > it even happened immediately after startup. I was still able to > continue voice conversation and if I remember correctly also > video was still fine .... > > Greetings, > > Konrad. That's extremely weird. Probably trying without video and with video preview disabled could be a good idea. It could be a bug in the firewire code (still experimental). -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 7 14:59:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E6E3B0B5A for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:59:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05339-02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:59:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668AE3B07A7 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:59:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (165-83.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.83.165]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA83A8DC for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:01:30 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502061932.50955.rdorsch@web.de> <1107715558.3222.28.camel@golgoth01> <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:59:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:59:18 -0000 Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 20:53 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Damien, [...] > > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > > gconftool-2 > > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > > 111.222.333.444 --type=string > > I did that now on the workstation machine and veryfied the settings with > gconftool-2 --set ... > > But I do not receive anything on my laptop machine. Does gnomemeeting write a > logfile which I could check? > No but if you run it with "-d 3" you will see what it is doing. > > > > For version 1.2, no need to restart GnomeMeeting, it will be taken into > > account immediately. > > > > As mentioned before, I am running 1.0.2. The gconftool-2 changes take effect > in the preferences box. Is that sufficient to be sure that the changes are > effective? > Yes, the only difference between 1.0.2 and 1.2 is the name of the key, for some keys. If the change is effective, then that's ok. > Thanks, > Rainer > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Tue Feb 8 13:23:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BF03B1313 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:23:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22516-08 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:23:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC3DB3B0FE2 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:23:07 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2005 18:23:05 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2005 19:23:05 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:22:59 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050208182259.GA458localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:23:12 -0000 Perhaps this one is better: (both video send and receive disabled) I just tried to connect to 127.0.0.1 and got a busy sign as usual. Konrad PS: I am still in gdb. if you respond during the next few minutes I can do further diagnostics (but I have to go home soon :) (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/gnomemeeting [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 365)] Detaching after fork from child process 368. [New Thread 27118512 (LWP 370)] [New Thread 104651696 (LWP 373)] [New Thread 37608368 (LWP 378)] [New Thread 78207920 (LWP 379)] [New Thread 115141552 (LWP 383)] [New Thread 125631408 (LWP 400)] [New Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402)] [New Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403)] [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402) exited] [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404)] [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404) exited] [Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403) exited] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 (gdb) bt #0 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #1 0x0507aa77 in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #2 0x050738bd in sw_corby_orb_dispatch_message () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #3 0x05073a77 in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #4 0x05073c0d in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #5 0x0507749a in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #6 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #7 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 #8 0x097de628 in ?? () #9 0x08b193d8 in ?? () #10 0x080b70d7 in GMZeroconfPublisher::Main (this=0x507d0ec) at zeroconf_publisher.cpp:262 #11 0x008b9bf8 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #12 0x00000001 in ?? () #13 0x00000001 in ?? () #14 0x00000000 in ?? () (gdb) f 0 0x507a7f6 : push %ebp 0x507a7f7 : mov %esp,%ebp 0x507a7f9 : mov 0x1c(%eax),%eax 0x507a7fc : jmp 0x507a806 0x507a7fe : cmp %edx,0x14(%eax) <======== crash <=================== 0x507a801 : je 0x507a80c 0x507a803 : mov 0x18(%eax),%eax 0x507a806 : test %eax,%eax 0x507a808 : jne 0x507a7fe 0x507a80a : xor %eax,%eax (gdb) i reg eax 0x72656e65 1919250021 ecx 0x97e0a88 159255176 edx 0x2 2 ebx 0x507d0ec 84398316 esp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 ebp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 esi 0x0 0 edi 0x97df9ae 159250862 eip 0x507a7fe 0x507a7fe eflags 0x10206 66054 cs 0x73 115 ss 0x7b 123 ds 0x7b 123 es 0x7b 123 fs 0x0 0 gs 0x33 51 (gdb) x/lx $eax+0x14 0x72656e79: Cannot access memory at address 0x72656e79 cat /proc/365/maps 00101000-001d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a 001d4000-001e6000 rw-p 000d2000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a 001e6000-001e9000 rw-p 001e6000 00:00 0 001e9000-001ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so 001ea000-001eb000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so 001eb000-00210000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 00210000-00211000 rw-p 00025000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 00213000-0022b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 0022b000-0022d000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 0022f000-004d8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 004d8000-004e1000 rw-p 002a9000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 004e1000-004e4000 rw-p 004e1000 00:00 0 004e6000-004ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 004ea000-004eb000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 004ed000-004f7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 004f7000-004f8000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 004fa000-0050c000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so 0050c000-0050d000 r--p 00011000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so 0050d000-0050e000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so 0050e000-00510000 rw-p 0050e000 00:00 0 00512000-00579000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 00579000-0057e000 rw-p 00066000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 0057e000-00580000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 00580000-00581000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 00581000-0058a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so 0058a000-0058b000 r--p 00008000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so 0058b000-0058c000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so 0058c000-0058d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so 0058d000-0058f000 rw-p 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so 00590000-0059f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 0059f000-005a0000 ---p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 005a0000-005a1000 r--p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 005a1000-005a2000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so 005a2000-005a4000 rw-p 005a2000 00:00 0 005a4000-005b1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so 005b1000-005b2000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so 005b2000-005b4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 005b4000-005b5000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 005b6000-005be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 005be000-005bf000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 005bf000-005c3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 005c3000-005c4000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 005c4000-005c7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so 005c7000-005c8000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so 005c8000-005cb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so 005cb000-005cc000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so 005cd000-005d5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so 005d5000-005d6000 r--p 00007000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so 005d6000-005d7000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so 005d7000-005e1000 rw-p 005d7000 00:00 0 005e3000-005f4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 005f4000-005f7000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 005f7000-00605000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so 00605000-00606000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so 00606000-00612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so 00612000-00613000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so 00613000-00618000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so 00618000-00619000 r--p 00004000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so 00619000-0061a000 rw-p 00005000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so 0061a000-00641000 rw-p 0061a000 00:00 0 00643000-00649000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 00649000-0064a000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 0064a000-00663000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 00663000-00666000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 00666000-00672000 rw-p 00666000 00:00 0 00672000-0067b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so 0067b000-0067c000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so 0067e000-006a8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 006a8000-006a9000 rw-p 0002a000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 006a9000-006b6000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so 006b6000-006b9000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so 006b9000-006ca000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 006ca000-006cd000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 006d1000-006d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 006d4000-006d5000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 006d7000-006f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 006f8000-006fb000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 006fd000-00705000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 00705000-00706000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 00708000-0074e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 0074e000-00759000 rw-p 00045000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 00759000-0075a000 rw-p 00759000 00:00 0 0075a000-00764000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so 00764000-00766000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so 00766000-00772000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so 00772000-00773000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so 00775000-0078a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so 0078a000-0078b000 r--p 00014000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so 0078b000-0078c000 rw-p 00015000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so 00792000-008b5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008b5000-008b6000 ---p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008b6000-008b8000 r--p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008b8000-008ba000 rw-p 00125000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so 008ba000-008bc000 rw-p 008ba000 00:00 0 008be000-008df000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so 008df000-008e0000 r--p 00020000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so 008e0000-008e1000 rw-p 00021000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so 008e3000-008e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so 008e5000-008e6000 r--p 00001000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so 008e6000-008e7000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so 008e9000-008f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 008f8000-008f9000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 008fb000-009be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 009be000-009c2000 rw-p 000c3000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 009c4000-009d2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so 009d2000-009d3000 r--p 0000d000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so 009d3000-009d4000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so 009d4000-009d6000 rw-p 009d4000 00:00 0 009d8000-009e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 009e5000-009e6000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 009e8000-009ef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 009ef000-009f0000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 009f2000-00a07000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 00a07000-00a08000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 00a08000-00a0a000 rw-p 00a08000 00:00 0 00a0c000-00a1f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 00a1f000-00a20000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 00a22000-00a82000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 00a82000-00a89000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 00a8b000-00aa8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 00aa8000-00aaa000 rw-p 0001d000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 00aac000-00ace000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 00ace000-00ad1000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 00ad1000-00ad2000 rw-p 00ad1000 00:00 0 00ad4000-00ae5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 00ae5000-00ae6000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 00ae8000-00aef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 00aef000-00af0000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 00af2000-00af4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 00af4000-00af5000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 00af7000-00af9000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 00af9000-00afa000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 00afc000-00b04000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 00b04000-00b05000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 00b07000-00b0e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 00b0e000-00b0f000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 00b11000-00bd2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 00bd2000-00bd7000 rw-p 000c1000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 00bd7000-00bdd000 rw-p 00bd7000 00:00 0 00bdf000-00bfc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 00bfc000-00bfd000 rw-p 0001c000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 00bff000-00c79000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c79000-00c7a000 rw-p 0007a000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c7c000-00c7e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c7e000-00c7f000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 00c81000-00cbb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 00cbb000-00cbd000 rw-p 00039000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 00cbf000-00cc1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 00cc1000-00cc2000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 00cc4000-00ce4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 00ce4000-00ce5000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 00ce5000-00ceb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so 00ceb000-00ced000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so 00d05000-00d10000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 00d10000-00d11000 rw-p 0000a000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 00d17000-00d48000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a 00d48000-00d4b000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a 00d4e000-00d63000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 00d63000-00d64000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 00d66000-00d78000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 00d78000-00d79000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 00d7c000-00d83000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 00d83000-00d84000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 00d86000-00d9a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 00d9a000-00d9b000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 00db3000-00dbe000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 00dbe000-00dbf000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 00dc2000-00df3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 00df3000-00df8000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 00dfa000-00dfd000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 00dfd000-00dfe000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 00dfe000-00e20000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 00e20000-00e21000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 00f47000-00f49000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so 00f49000-00f4a000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so 00f4d000-00f4f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so 00f4f000-00f50000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so 00fcd000-00fdb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so 00fdb000-00fdc000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so 00fdc000-00fdd000 ---p 00fdc000 00:00 0 00fdd000-019dd000 rwxp 00fdd000 00:00 0 019dd000-019de000 ---p 019dd000 00:00 0 019de000-023de000 rwxp 019de000 00:00 0 0277f000-027dc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 027dc000-027df000 rw-p 0005c000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 029a2000-02a03000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 02a03000-02a05000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 02a05000-02a21000 rw-p 02a05000 00:00 0 02d15000-02da0000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 02da0000-02da4000 rw-p 0008a000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 02f08000-02f1b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 02f1b000-02f1c000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 02f1e000-02f81000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 02f81000-02f83000 rw-p 00063000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 03320000-03350000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 03350000-03351000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 03353000-033ae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 033ae000-033af000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 033b1000-03471000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 03471000-03476000 rw-p 000bf000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 03478000-034ac000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 034ac000-034ad000 rw-p 00033000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 034ad000-034b0000 rw-p 034ad000 00:00 0 035ec000-03612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 03612000-03616000 rw-p 00026000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 03693000-036ee000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 036ee000-036f3000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 036f5000-03db2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so 03db2000-03e00000 rw-p 006bc000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so 03e00000-03e01000 rw-p 03e00000 00:00 0 03e03000-04068000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 04068000-0408e000 rw-p 00264000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 0408e000-04095000 rw-p 0408e000 00:00 0 04095000-04096000 ---p 04095000 00:00 0 04096000-04a96000 rwxp 04096000 00:00 0 04b0b000-04bae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 04bae000-04bb2000 rw-p 000a3000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 04f3d000-05021000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 05021000-0502a000 rw-p 000e3000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 0502a000-05032000 rw-p 0502a000 00:00 0 05034000-05065000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 05065000-05068000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 0506a000-0507d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 0507d000-0507e000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 0507e000-05190000 rw-p 0507e000 00:00 0 051f4000-05242000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 05242000-0524c000 rw-p 0004d000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 059cd000-059ce000 ---p 059cd000 00:00 0 059ce000-063ce000 rwxp 059ce000 00:00 0 063ce000-063cf000 ---p 063ce000 00:00 0 063cf000-06dcf000 rwxp 063cf000 00:00 0 06dcf000-06dd0000 ---p 06dcf000 00:00 0 06dd0000-077d0000 rwxp 06dd0000 00:00 0 08039000-0810b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting 0810b000-08118000 rw-p 000d1000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting 08118000-08119000 rw-p 08118000 00:00 0 08119000-0811a000 ---p 08119000 00:00 0 0811a000-08b1a000 rwxp 0811a000 00:00 0 09516000-09861000 rw-p 09516000 00:00 0 b6856000-b6857000 ---p b6856000 00:00 0 b6857000-b7257000 rwxp b6857000 00:00 0 b7257000-b7258000 ---p b7257000 00:00 0 b7258000-b7c58000 rwxp b7258000 00:00 0 b7c58000-b7cb8000 rw-s 00000000 00:07 36208644 /SYSV00000000 (deleted) b7cb8000-b7cca000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1689784 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/l048013t.pfa b7cca000-b7d2c000 rw-p b7cca000 00:00 0 b7d94000-b7d9a000 r--s 00000000 03:03 1573058 /usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache b7d9a000-b7d9b000 r--p 00b61000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7d9b000-b7da1000 r--p 00b47000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7da1000-b7dce000 r--p 00b09000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7dce000-b7fce000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive b7fce000-b7fdf000 rw-p b7fce000 00:00 0 bfe5c000-bfe68000 rwxp bfe5c000 00:00 0 bfe68000-c0000000 rw-p bfe68000 00:00 0 ffffe000-fffff000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0 From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 8 14:39:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C71F3B0961 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:39:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26871-10 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:39:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1293B0BA5 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (94-99.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.99.94]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8692291; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:41:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050208182259.GA458localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <20050208182259.GA458localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:38:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: kk@verfaction.de X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 19:39:07 -0000 Good, at least we see it crashes in the ZeroConf code. And I also see that you are running libhowl-0.9.6. GnomeMeeting explicitely requests HOWL (the ZeroConf library) 0.9.7 because we are aware that there is a bug in HOWL 0.9.6 and that this bug can crash GnomeMeeting and has been fixed in 0.9.7. That means that : - the packages you are using are buggy - the maintainer of those packages forced HOWL 0.9.6 to be used when GnomeMeeting requested 0.9.7, so he had to modify GnomeMeeting for that. Would it be possible for you to contact the person who built the packages and to put it in contact with us? All of this wouldn't happen if we had support from RedHat and could offer correct packages to our users :( Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 19:22 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > Perhaps this one is better: > > (both video send and receive disabled) > > I just tried to connect to 127.0.0.1 and got a busy sign > as usual. > > Konrad > > PS: I am still in gdb. if you respond during the next few minutes > I can do further diagnostics (but I have to go home soon :) > > (gdb) r > Starting program: /usr/bin/gnomemeeting > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208162624 (LWP 365)] > Detaching after fork from child process 368. > [New Thread 27118512 (LWP 370)] > [New Thread 104651696 (LWP 373)] > [New Thread 37608368 (LWP 378)] > [New Thread 78207920 (LWP 379)] > [New Thread 115141552 (LWP 383)] > [New Thread 125631408 (LWP 400)] > [New Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] > [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402)] > [New Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403)] > [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 402) exited] > [New Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404)] > [Thread -1211794512 (LWP 404) exited] > [Thread -1222284368 (LWP 403) exited] > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread 145857456 (LWP 401)] > 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0507a7fe in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #1 0x0507aa77 in sw_mdns_stub_check_version () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #2 0x050738bd in sw_corby_orb_dispatch_message () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #3 0x05073a77 in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #4 0x05073c0d in sw_corby_orb_read_channel () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #5 0x0507749a in sw_salt_step () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #6 0x0507787a in sw_salt_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #7 0x05074483 in sw_discovery_run () from /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1 > #8 0x097de628 in ?? () > #9 0x08b193d8 in ?? () > #10 0x080b70d7 in GMZeroconfPublisher::Main (this=0x507d0ec) at zeroconf_publisher.cpp:262 > #11 0x008b9bf8 in main_arena () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #12 0x00000001 in ?? () > #13 0x00000001 in ?? () > #14 0x00000000 in ?? () > (gdb) f 0 > > 0x507a7f6 : push %ebp > 0x507a7f7 : mov %esp,%ebp > 0x507a7f9 : mov 0x1c(%eax),%eax > 0x507a7fc : jmp 0x507a806 > 0x507a7fe : cmp %edx,0x14(%eax) <======== crash <=================== > 0x507a801 : je 0x507a80c > 0x507a803 : mov 0x18(%eax),%eax > 0x507a806 : test %eax,%eax > 0x507a808 : jne 0x507a7fe > 0x507a80a : xor %eax,%eax > > (gdb) i reg > eax 0x72656e65 1919250021 > ecx 0x97e0a88 159255176 > edx 0x2 2 > ebx 0x507d0ec 84398316 > esp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 > ebp 0x8b18f98 0x8b18f98 > esi 0x0 0 > edi 0x97df9ae 159250862 > eip 0x507a7fe 0x507a7fe > eflags 0x10206 66054 > cs 0x73 115 > ss 0x7b 123 > ds 0x7b 123 > es 0x7b 123 > fs 0x0 0 > gs 0x33 51 > > (gdb) x/lx $eax+0x14 > 0x72656e79: Cannot access memory at address 0x72656e79 > > cat /proc/365/maps > > > 00101000-001d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a > 001d4000-001e6000 rw-p 000d2000 03:03 933943 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a > 001e6000-001e9000 rw-p 001e6000 00:00 0 > 001e9000-001ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so > 001ea000-001eb000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1917063 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ima_adpcm_audio_pwplugin.so > 001eb000-00210000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00210000-00211000 rw-p 00025000 03:03 869213 /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00213000-0022b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 > 0022b000-0022d000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 869829 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.800.0 > 0022f000-004d8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 004d8000-004e1000 rw-p 002a9000 03:03 869830 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 004e1000-004e4000 rw-p 004e1000 00:00 0 > 004e6000-004ea000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004ea000-004eb000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869214 /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004ed000-004f7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004f7000-004f8000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 869215 /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 004fa000-0050c000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so > 0050c000-0050d000 r--p 00011000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so > 0050d000-0050e000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 933930 /lib/libnsl-2.3.4.so > 0050e000-00510000 rw-p 0050e000 00:00 0 > 00512000-00579000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 00579000-0057e000 rw-p 00066000 03:03 869621 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 0057e000-00580000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 > 00580000-00581000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1609168 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 > 00581000-0058a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so > 0058a000-0058b000 r--p 00008000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so > 0058b000-0058c000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 933937 /lib/libnss_files-2.3.4.so > 0058c000-0058d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so > 0058d000-0058f000 rw-p 00000000 03:03 1573000 /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so > 00590000-0059f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 0059f000-005a0000 ---p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 005a0000-005a1000 r--p 0000f000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 005a1000-005a2000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 933941 /lib/libresolv-2.3.4.so > 005a2000-005a4000 rw-p 005a2000 00:00 0 > 005a4000-005b1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so > 005b1000-005b2000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917057 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/v4l_pwplugin.so > 005b2000-005b4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 > 005b4000-005b5000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1545113 /usr/lib/librom1394.so.0.1.1 > 005b6000-005be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 > 005be000-005bf000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 869939 /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.1 > 005bf000-005c3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 > 005c3000-005c4000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869913 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.5.2.0 > 005c4000-005c7000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so > 005c7000-005c8000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917060 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/g726_audio_pwplugin.so > 005c8000-005cb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so > 005cb000-005cc000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 1640539 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so > 005cd000-005d5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so > 005d5000-005d6000 r--p 00007000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so > 005d6000-005d7000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 933938 /lib/tls/librt-2.3.4.so > 005d7000-005e1000 rw-p 005d7000 00:00 0 > 005e3000-005f4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 > 005f4000-005f7000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 869929 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 > 005f7000-00605000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so > 00605000-00606000 rw-p 0000d000 03:03 1917054 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/oss_pwplugin.so > 00606000-00612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so > 00612000-00613000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917053 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/sound/alsa_pwplugin.so > 00613000-00618000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so > 00618000-00619000 r--p 00004000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so > 00619000-0061a000 rw-p 00005000 03:03 933926 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.4.so > 0061a000-00641000 rw-p 0061a000 00:00 0 > 00643000-00649000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 > 00649000-0064a000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 869912 /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0 > 0064a000-00663000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 > 00663000-00666000 rw-p 00018000 03:03 1553302 /usr/lib/libdv.so.4.0.1 > 00666000-00672000 rw-p 00666000 00:00 0 > 00672000-0067b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so > 0067b000-0067c000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1917061 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/gsm0610_audio_pwplugin.so > 0067e000-006a8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 > 006a8000-006a9000 rw-p 0002a000 03:03 1548248 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.800.0 > 006a9000-006b6000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so > 006b6000-006b9000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1917062 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/ilbc_audio_pwplugin.so > 006b9000-006ca000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 > 006ca000-006cd000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 1548435 /usr/lib/libspeex.so.1.2.0 > 006d1000-006d4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 006d4000-006d5000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 868983 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 006d7000-006f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 > 006f8000-006fb000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869933 /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2 > 006fd000-00705000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 > 00705000-00706000 rw-p 00008000 03:03 1551048 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.35 > 00708000-0074e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 > 0074e000-00759000 rw-p 00045000 03:03 869923 /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0.0.0 > 00759000-0075a000 rw-p 00759000 00:00 0 > 0075a000-00764000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so > 00764000-00766000 rw-p 00009000 03:03 1917064 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/lpc10_audio_pwplugin.so > 00766000-00772000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so > 00772000-00773000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1721545 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libbluecurve.so > 00775000-0078a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so > 0078a000-0078b000 r--p 00014000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so > 0078b000-0078c000 rw-p 00015000 03:03 933897 /lib/ld-2.3.4.so > 00792000-008b5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008b5000-008b6000 ---p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008b6000-008b8000 r--p 00123000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008b8000-008ba000 rw-p 00125000 03:03 933901 /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so > 008ba000-008bc000 rw-p 008ba000 00:00 0 > 008be000-008df000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so > 008df000-008e0000 r--p 00020000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so > 008e0000-008e1000 rw-p 00021000 03:03 933905 /lib/tls/libm-2.3.4.so > 008e3000-008e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so > 008e5000-008e6000 r--p 00001000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so > 008e6000-008e7000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 933907 /lib/libdl-2.3.4.so > 008e9000-008f8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 > 008f8000-008f9000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 868387 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 > 008fb000-009be000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 > 009be000-009c2000 rw-p 000c3000 03:03 1554971 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 > 009c4000-009d2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so > 009d2000-009d3000 r--p 0000d000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so > 009d3000-009d4000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 933928 /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.4.so > 009d4000-009d6000 rw-p 009d4000 00:00 0 > 009d8000-009e5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 > 009e5000-009e6000 rw-p 0000c000 03:03 1819365 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 > 009e8000-009ef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 > 009ef000-009f0000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821207 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0 > 009f2000-00a07000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 > 00a07000-00a08000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 1821206 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3 > 00a08000-00a0a000 rw-p 00a08000 00:00 0 > 00a0c000-00a1f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 > 00a1f000-00a20000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869955 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.19 > 00a22000-00a82000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 > 00a82000-00a89000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 868995 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.7 > 00a8b000-00aa8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 > 00aa8000-00aaa000 rw-p 0001d000 03:03 869066 /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 > 00aac000-00ace000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 > 00ace000-00ad1000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869152 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.0.4 > 00ad1000-00ad2000 rw-p 00ad1000 00:00 0 > 00ad4000-00ae5000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 > 00ae5000-00ae6000 rw-p 00010000 03:03 1821204 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 > 00ae8000-00aef000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 > 00aef000-00af0000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1820658 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2 > 00af2000-00af4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 > 00af4000-00af5000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1821190 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 > 00af7000-00af9000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 > 00af9000-00afa000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1821203 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1.0 > 00afc000-00b04000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 > 00b04000-00b05000 rw-p 00007000 03:03 1821205 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 > 00b07000-00b0e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 > 00b0e000-00b0f000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 933910 /lib/libgcc_s-3.4.2-20041018.so.1 > 00b11000-00bd2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 > 00bd2000-00bd7000 rw-p 000c1000 03:03 1554997 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 > 00bd7000-00bdd000 rw-p 00bd7000 00:00 0 > 00bdf000-00bfc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 > 00bfc000-00bfd000 rw-p 0001c000 03:03 869859 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 > 00bff000-00c79000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c79000-00c7a000 rw-p 0007a000 03:03 1548563 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c7c000-00c7e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c7e000-00c7f000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1548556 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00c81000-00cbb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00cbb000-00cbd000 rw-p 00039000 03:03 1554617 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.8 > 00cbf000-00cc1000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 > 00cc1000-00cc2000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 933912 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.1 > 00cc4000-00ce4000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 > 00ce4000-00ce5000 rw-p 00020000 03:03 869832 /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3.0 > 00ce5000-00ceb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so > 00ceb000-00ced000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1640546 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so > 00d05000-00d10000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 > 00d10000-00d11000 rw-p 0000a000 03:03 869936 /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0 > 00d17000-00d48000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a > 00d48000-00d4b000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 934005 /lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a > 00d4e000-00d63000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 > 00d63000-00d64000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 869884 /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.16 > 00d66000-00d78000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 > 00d78000-00d79000 rw-p 00012000 03:03 1551933 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0.800.0 > 00d7c000-00d83000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 > 00d83000-00d84000 rw-p 00006000 03:03 1821202 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6.0 > 00d86000-00d9a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 00d9a000-00d9b000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 1554693 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.14 > 00db3000-00dbe000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 00dbe000-00dbf000 rw-p 0000b000 03:03 1544915 /usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 00dc2000-00df3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00df3000-00df8000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869154 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.600.0 > 00dfa000-00dfd000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 > 00dfd000-00dfe000 rw-p 00003000 03:03 869927 /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0.0.0 > 00dfe000-00e20000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > 00e20000-00e21000 rw-p 00022000 03:03 869870 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > 00f47000-00f49000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so > 00f49000-00f4a000 rw-p 00002000 03:03 1917065 /usr/lib/pwlib/codecs/audio/speex_audio_pwplugin.so > 00f4d000-00f4f000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so > 00f4f000-00f50000 rw-p 00001000 03:03 1640493 /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so > 00fcd000-00fdb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so > 00fdb000-00fdc000 rw-p 0000e000 03:03 1917056 /usr/lib/pwlib/devices/videoinput/avc_pwplugin.so > 00fdc000-00fdd000 ---p 00fdc000 00:00 0 > 00fdd000-019dd000 rwxp 00fdd000 00:00 0 > 019dd000-019de000 ---p 019dd000 00:00 0 > 019de000-023de000 rwxp 019de000 00:00 0 > 0277f000-027dc000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 > 027dc000-027df000 rw-p 0005c000 03:03 869876 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 > 029a2000-02a03000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 > 02a03000-02a05000 rw-p 00060000 03:03 869944 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.0 > 02a05000-02a21000 rw-p 02a05000 00:00 0 > 02d15000-02da0000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 > 02da0000-02da4000 rw-p 0008a000 03:03 1547498 /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0.800.0 > 02f08000-02f1b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 > 02f1b000-02f1c000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 868825 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2 > 02f1e000-02f81000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 > 02f81000-02f83000 rw-p 00063000 03:03 1551323 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3.2 > 03320000-03350000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 03350000-03351000 rw-p 00030000 03:03 869956 /usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 03353000-033ae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 > 033ae000-033af000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 1547320 /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.0.0.0 > 033b1000-03471000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 > 03471000-03476000 rw-p 000bf000 03:03 1552338 /usr/lib/libedataserver.so.3.2.2 > 03478000-034ac000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 034ac000-034ad000 rw-p 00033000 03:03 868636 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6 > 034ad000-034b0000 rw-p 034ad000 00:00 0 > 035ec000-03612000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 > 03612000-03616000 rw-p 00026000 03:03 869249 /usr/lib/libebook.so.8.0.5 > 03693000-036ee000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 > 036ee000-036f3000 rw-p 0005b000 03:03 869860 /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0.800.2 > 036f5000-03db2000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so > 03db2000-03e00000 rw-p 006bc000 03:03 1551481 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so > 03e00000-03e01000 rw-p 03e00000 00:00 0 > 03e03000-04068000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > 04068000-0408e000 rw-p 00264000 03:03 1543759 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.8.3 > 0408e000-04095000 rw-p 0408e000 00:00 0 > 04095000-04096000 ---p 04095000 00:00 0 > 04096000-04a96000 rwxp 04096000 00:00 0 > 04b0b000-04bae000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 > 04bae000-04bb2000 rw-p 000a3000 03:03 934156 /lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 > 04f3d000-05021000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 > 05021000-0502a000 rw-p 000e3000 03:03 1548398 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.16 > 0502a000-05032000 rw-p 0502a000 00:00 0 > 05034000-05065000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 > 05065000-05068000 rw-p 00031000 03:03 869926 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0 > 0506a000-0507d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 > 0507d000-0507e000 rw-p 00013000 03:03 869931 /usr/lib/libhowl-0.9.6.so.1.0.0 > 0507e000-05190000 rw-p 0507e000 00:00 0 > 051f4000-05242000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 > 05242000-0524c000 rw-p 0004d000 03:03 869930 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 > 059cd000-059ce000 ---p 059cd000 00:00 0 > 059ce000-063ce000 rwxp 059ce000 00:00 0 > 063ce000-063cf000 ---p 063ce000 00:00 0 > 063cf000-06dcf000 rwxp 063cf000 00:00 0 > 06dcf000-06dd0000 ---p 06dcf000 00:00 0 > 06dd0000-077d0000 rwxp 06dd0000 00:00 0 > 08039000-0810b000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting > 0810b000-08118000 rw-p 000d1000 03:03 1950861 /usr/bin/gnomemeeting > 08118000-08119000 rw-p 08118000 00:00 0 > 08119000-0811a000 ---p 08119000 00:00 0 > 0811a000-08b1a000 rwxp 0811a000 00:00 0 > 09516000-09861000 rw-p 09516000 00:00 0 > b6856000-b6857000 ---p b6856000 00:00 0 > b6857000-b7257000 rwxp b6857000 00:00 0 > b7257000-b7258000 ---p b7257000 00:00 0 > b7258000-b7c58000 rwxp b7258000 00:00 0 > b7c58000-b7cb8000 rw-s 00000000 00:07 36208644 /SYSV00000000 (deleted) > b7cb8000-b7cca000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1689784 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/l048013t.pfa > b7cca000-b7d2c000 rw-p b7cca000 00:00 0 > b7d94000-b7d9a000 r--s 00000000 03:03 1573058 /usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache > b7d9a000-b7d9b000 r--p 00b61000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7d9b000-b7da1000 r--p 00b47000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7da1000-b7dce000 r--p 00b09000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7dce000-b7fce000 r--p 00000000 03:03 1551960 /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive > b7fce000-b7fdf000 rw-p b7fce000 00:00 0 > bfe5c000-bfe68000 rwxp bfe5c000 00:00 0 > bfe68000-c0000000 rw-p bfe68000 00:00 0 > ffffe000-fffff000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0 > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Tue Feb 8 15:03:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8804F3B078A for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:03:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28858-02 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:03:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A8B63B16A9 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:01:33 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2005 20:01:31 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2005 21:01:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:01:23 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050208200123.GA3250localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:03:17 -0000 On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:38:57PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > Good, at least we see it crashes in the ZeroConf code. > > And I also see that you are running libhowl-0.9.6. > > GnomeMeeting explicitely requests HOWL (the ZeroConf library) 0.9.7 > because we are aware that there is a bug in HOWL 0.9.6 and that this bug > can crash GnomeMeeting and has been fixed in 0.9.7. > > That means that : > - the packages you are using are buggy > - the maintainer of those packages forced HOWL 0.9.6 to be used when > GnomeMeeting requested 0.9.7, so he had to modify GnomeMeeting for that. > > Would it be possible for you to contact the person who built the > packages and to put it in contact with us? > > All of this wouldn't happen if we had support from RedHat and could > offer correct packages to our users :( > ... you see I am still at work :( I got GM from http://yum.nrpms.net/ (web site is at www.nrpms.net) The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. My system is fully uptodate Fedora Core 3 which unfortunately still has howl-0.9.6-6 .... Thanks Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 8 15:14:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA2E3B16BD for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:14:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29438-01 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:13:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCF23B1182 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:13:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (94-99.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.99.94]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2A118ADA for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:15:56 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050208200123.GA3250localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <20050208200123.GA3250localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:13:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:14:01 -0000 Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 21:01 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > ... you see I am still at work :( > :-( > I got GM from http://yum.nrpms.net/ > > (web site is at www.nrpms.net) > > The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was > responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. > ok please tell us what he answered. > My system is fully uptodate Fedora Core 3 which unfortunately still > has howl-0.9.6-6 .... > In that case that is better to disable howl than to force another version that the one that was recommended by the software ;) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Wed Feb 9 06:57:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0920E3B076E for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:57:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10178-05 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:57:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63A823B07AB for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:57:03 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Feb 2005 11:57:02 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 09 Feb 2005 12:57:02 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:56:59 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050209115659.GA11626localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:57:06 -0000 On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:13:32PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: ..... > > The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was > > responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. > > > > ok please tell us what he answered. > He will update to howl-0.9.10 as soon as time permits. Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 9 07:02:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D499E3B1242 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:02:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10417-10 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:02:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2563B1274 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:02:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14864C50F for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:05:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050209115659.GA11626localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> <20050209115659.GA11626localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:02:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:02:38 -0000 Excellent news, thanks for the feedback! I think (but I'm not sure!) that if you shutdown mdnsresponder, the bug won't happen. I'm really not sure, actually I don't remember and I could be wrong. Le mercredi 09 février 2005 à 12:56 +0100, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:13:32PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > ..... > > > The repo maintainer has been contacted by a friend in the past and he was > > > responding quite nice - my friend will send e-mail about the howl issue. > > > > > > > ok please tell us what he answered. > > > > He will update to howl-0.9.10 as soon as time permits. > > Konrad > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Wed Feb 9 09:31:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870E43B1617 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:31:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18584-04 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:31:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B680B3B08A8 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:31:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from j385b.j.pppool.de ([85.74.56.91] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cyss0-0006Su-00 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:31:08 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cyss1-0005cH-00 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:31:09 +0100 X-IMAP-Sender: rd From: Rainer Dorsch To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:30:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> X-KMail-Link-Message: 119527 X-KMail-Link-Type: reply X-KMail-CryptoFormat: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline X-KMail-Recipients: GnomeMeeting mailing list Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: Message-Id: Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:31:11 -0000 Damien, On Montag 07 Februar 2005 20:59, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 07 février 2005 à 20:53 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > > Damien, > > [...] > > > > Yes, you can edit the GConf key : > > > gconftool-2 > > > --set /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > > > 111.222.333.444 --type=string > > > > I did that now on the workstation machine and veryfied the settings with > > gconftool-2 --set ... > > > > But I do not receive anything on my laptop machine. Does gnomemeeting > > write a logfile which I could check? > > No but if you run it with "-d 3" you will see what it is doing. Thanks, good hint, brings lots of information. This is the log on the workstation, which is supposed to forward the call. Do you understand from this why gnomemeeting does not forward the call? 2005/02/09 15:12:02.245 6:17.792 H323 Listener:830a2b8 H323TCP Started connection: host=::ffff:119.152.191.172:3510, if=119.152.251.114:1720, handle=37 2005/02/09 15:12:02.246 6:17.793 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Started incoming call thread 2005/02/09 15:12:02.246 6:17.793 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Awaiting first PDU 2005/02/09 15:12:02.252 6:17.800 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Receiving PDU: setup 2005/02/09 15:12:02.253 6:17.800 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.253 6:17.800 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.253 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: MS-GSM{sw} <5> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.254 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.254 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <2> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.254 6:17.801 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <8> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.802 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <4> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.802 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: G.726-32k{sw} <9> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.802 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: G.711-uLaw-64k{sw} <6> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.255 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: G.711-ALaw-64k{sw} <7> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.256 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.256 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.256 6:17.803 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.257 6:17.804 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.257 6:17.804 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.257 6:17.804 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Added capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.805 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.805 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: MS-GSM{sw} <5> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.805 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.258 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <2> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.259 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <8> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.259 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <4> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.259 6:17.806 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: G.726-32k{sw} <9> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.260 6:17.807 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: G.711-uLaw-64k{sw} <6> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.260 6:17.807 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: G.711-ALaw-64k{sw} <7> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.260 6:17.807 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.261 6:17.808 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.261 6:17.808 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.261 6:17.808 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.262 6:17.809 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.262 6:17.809 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Found capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.810 H225 Answer:83c0d70 RFC2833 Handler created 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.810 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.810 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Handling PDU: Setup callRef=83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.263 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/09 15:12:02.264 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/09 15:12:02.264 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/09 15:12:02.264 6:17.811 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.812 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Source signal address ip$119.152.191.172:1720 and TCP peer address ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510 indicate remote endpoint is behind NAT 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.813 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/09 15:12:02.267 6:17.814 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/09 15:12:02.276 6:17.823 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 reason=EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 set to EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending release complete PDU: callRef=83 2005/02/09 15:12:02.280 6:17.827 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Sending PDU: releaseComplete 2005/02/09 15:12:02.280 6:17.828 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections 2005/02/09 15:12:02.281 6:17.828 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 closing: connectionState=NoConnectionActive 2005/02/09 15:12:02.281 6:17.828 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Application not accepting calls 2005/02/09 15:12:02.282 6:17.829 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 reason=EndedByTransportFail 2005/02/09 15:12:02.283 6:17.831 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Signal channel stopped on first PDU. 2005/02/09 15:12:02.285 6:17.832 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::Close 2005/02/09 15:12:02.286 6:17.833 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:83c0d70 2005/02/09 15:12:02.286 6:17.833 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 terminated. 2005/02/09 15:12:02.309 6:17.856 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 deleted. 2005/02/09 15:12:02.310 6:17.857 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections Thanks, Rainer From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 9 09:48:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BABD3B1118 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:48:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19861-09 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:48:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2243B08BD for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:48:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A2D18D12 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:50:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502072053.23889.rdorsch@web.de> <1107806356.12986.6.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:48:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:48:06 -0000 Le mercredi 09 février 2005 à 15:30 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Damien, > Thanks, good hint, brings lots of information. This is the log on the > workstation, which is supposed to forward the call. Do you understand from > this why gnomemeeting does not forward the call? > yes > 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.812 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 Source > signal address ip$119.152.191.172:1720 and TCP peer address > ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510 indicate remote endpoint is behind NAT The remote endpoint is not behind NAT. That's a bug in the openh323 release shipped with GM 1.2 when using ipv6, it will be fixed when we release 1.2.1. I'm not sure it triggers the problem as even with that bug, it should work. But I see this : 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 set to EndedByNoAccept I do not know your IP addresses, but I see no forwarding being done. Are you sure it is enabled? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk_konrad@gmx.at Wed Feb 9 11:53:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C1B3B0904 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:53:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28116-04 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:53:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8708E3B116D for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:48:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Feb 2005 16:48:40 -0000 Received: from dinoc9.indmath.uni-linz.ac.at (EHLO localhost) (140.78.117.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 09 Feb 2005 17:48:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25381063 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:48:37 +0100 From: Konrad Karl To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 Message-ID: <20050209164837.GA16647localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:53:52 -0000 On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:02:34PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Excellent news, thanks for the feedback! > > I think (but I'm not sure!) that if you shutdown mdnsresponder, the bug > won't happen. I'm really not sure, actually I don't remember and I could > be wrong. > > when I shutdown mdnsresponder I get the following on startup: gnomemeeting [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 dont know yet if the crash frequency is now zero or not. ---------------------- furthermore: when quitting or clicking on the X then GM is not really terminated. I always have to ^C it as well. (independent of mdnsresponder) Greetings, Konrad From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 9 12:59:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7553B0A28 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:59:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00867-01 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:59:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DBF3B097B for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:59:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from 91-224.244.81.adsl.skynet.be (91-224.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.224.91]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A2A16EC9 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:01:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] netmeeting+speex+gnomemeeting-1.2.0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050209164837.GA16647localhost> References: <1107419154.3325.11.camel@golgoth01> <1107427234.3325.78.camel@golgoth01> <1107456264.3189.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107467477.2643.7.camel@linuxzone> <1107799493.3223.2.camel@golgoth01> <1107806282.12986.3.camel@golgoth01> <1107891537.3290.10.camel@golgoth01> <1107893613.3290.12.camel@golgoth01> <1107950554.4368.17.camel@golgoth01> <20050209164837.GA16647localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1107971952.1434.4.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:59:12 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:59:29 -0000 Le mer 09/02/2005 à 17:48, Konrad Karl a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:02:34PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > Excellent news, thanks for the feedback! > > > > I think (but I'm not sure!) that if you shutdown mdnsresponder, the bug > > won't happen. I'm really not sure, actually I don't remember and I could > > be wrong. > > > > > when I shutdown mdnsresponder I get the following on startup: > > gnomemeeting > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > [assert] error: 107 (Transport endpoint is not connected) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_close", line: 873 > Yes, that is a bug in howl. It should silently fail :-/ > > dont know yet if the crash frequency is now zero or not. > > ---------------------- > > > furthermore: when quitting or clicking on the X then > GM is not really terminated. I always have to ^C it > as well. > (independent of mdnsresponder) > When clicking on the X, GM is hidden. You can make it reappear by clicking on the icon in the KDE systray, or gnome notification area, or whatever it is called on your system and DE. You have to properly quit to make it exit. > Greetings, > > Konrad > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From jerome@coffeebreaks.org Fri Feb 11 07:27:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4873B1B1D for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:27:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02831-09 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no [62.101.193.41]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CF93B1B3C for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from dolcevita.localnet (host-81-191-122-9.bluecom.no [81.191.122.9]) by s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373D13389BA; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:27:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dolcevita.localnet) by dolcevita.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzZtP-00078H-Tn; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:27:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? From: Jerome Lacoste To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CoffeeBreaks Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:27:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1108124847.8061.215.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: markhellman@techie.com X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:27:32 -0000 On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 21:27 +0000, Mark Hellman wrote: > Steve wrote: > > > Is there anyone who can make some Suse 9.2 packages? I > > know you are busy volunteers... > > GnomeMeeting 1.2 came out on 2004-12-12 and, according to the website, SuSE > 9.2 packages were "coming soon". Now, almost two months later, SuSE 9.2 > packages still are not available... > > On the other hand, Skype 1.0 was released 2 days ago. On the same day it was > released, packages for SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, and a static binary were > made available. Don't be surprised if Skype is getting more and more > popular... Mark, I will add a little argument to Damien and Craig's answers. It's not because you can get Skype for nothing that you can compare it to GnomeMeeting. I think you are mixing the different freedoms here. Skype is free as in beer (and not fully neither). GnomeMeeting is free as in beer AND as in speech. Competition is always good and should benefit to all of us in the end. Although I like what skype did to VoIP in general, i.e. raising the bar when it comes to simplify the setup & use, Skype locks you in a closed platform (and a suboptimal protocol). You are *today* 'free' to use Skype to make PC2PC calls, and you can use their service to make PC2PHONE calls (*). Nothing can say what will happen tomorrow. With GM you have the real Freedom. You can do what you want with it. Even start you own business around it as long as you stick to the rules defined by its license. You can expect this software to work not only today by also tomorrow. I find it sad that the main Linux distributions are not that involved with GM, because I believe this is today's Internet 'killer' application. If there was a little bit more investment behind it, GM could speed its development up and improve its support a lot. I would have expected someone like Michael Robertson to step up to the challenge, but he's probably busy with his new online music service... (Maybe will he read that mail?) Maybe to you, Cheers, Jerome (*) For my part I stick to prepaid cards as for long distance calls (Europe - South America), Skype Out has been twice more expensive and of lower quality in my experience, although it worked well for intra-Europe calls. From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 11 08:46:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90573B07EA for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:46:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08243-10 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:46:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5AE3B073A for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:46:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl25 ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:16:29 +0530 Message-ID: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:15:56 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2005 13:46:29.0156 (UTC) FILETIME=[1682F640:01C51040] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: openh323@openh323.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:46:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, Well can anyone please tell me any H.263 based card and compatible = WebCam + PTZ Camera (low cost) which must be supported by GnomeMeeting = and of course OpenH323. I am not getting any relevant information = regarding this. Actually I am confused in the output format of Camera and Input to the = H.263 supported card. Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is same as H.263. So does that mean = that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263 support. Thanks and regards. Ashutosh Sharma ------=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello All,
 
   Well can anyone please = tell me any=20 H.263 based card  and compatible WebCam + PTZ Camera (low = cost) which=20 must be supported by GnomeMeeting and of course OpenH323. I am not = getting any=20 relevant information regarding this.
 
Actually I am confused in the output = format of=20 Camera and Input to the H.263 supported card.
 
Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is = same as H.263.=20 So does that mean that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263=20 support.
 
Thanks and regards.
Ashutosh = Sharma
------=_NextPart_000_01D4_01C5106E.1CF89FB0-- From kk@verfaction.de Fri Feb 11 12:07:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56C63B1C8E for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:07:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21509-06 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:07:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0D93B1C67 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:07:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CzeGD-0001pZ-A4 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:17 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzeGA-0008Vr-Qa for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:15 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:14 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:07:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:07:20 -0000 --=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharma, > Well can anyone please tell me any H.263 based card and compatible > WebCam + PTZ Camera (low cost) which must be supported by GnomeMeeting > and of course OpenH323. I am not getting any relevant information > regarding this. > =20 > Actually I am confused in the output format of Camera and Input to the > H.263 supported card. the camera format is irrelevant to the H263 encoding in GnomeMeeting. As long as there's no generic video codec hook in OpenH323 there's no way to get an unpatched GnomeMeeting to speak H.263. For now there's only the chance of using the old patches from CVS which have been rolled back until OpenH323 has the described generic hook. You camera will most likely speak V4L, V4L2 or AVC and be from there converted to the streaming formats of H.26x, that's why your camera doesn't need to speak H.263 itself. =20 > Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is same as H.263. So does that mean > that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263 support. > =20 MPEG-4 is a general video description in terms of standards. DivX and XviD are the non-streaming versions, H.264 is the streaming version of MPEG-4. H.263 is the streaming version of MPEG-2 and H.261 of MPEG-1. (please Craig correct me if i'm wrong) That's about the same discussion as why Ogg Speex (streaming format) isn't Ogg Vorbis (non-streaming format). They use the same ideas of codec design, but have different targets in terms of stream loss and connection reliability vs. compactation and image quality. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDOZBvdkzt4X+wX8RAqoVAJ4yfO4qkFM7bpEVs6RhOyzfWlO6dwCbBewI syW8ipIClA/aKk5GvIK+0OA= =Szl1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-73DmGWj0Gybz/1f5UJm8-- From lurch@gmx.li Fri Feb 11 13:34:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CE43B0A54 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:34:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27118-05 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F83D3B0EE2 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:32:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IBR00917FILQZ@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1BIWj1a008310 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:45 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 1481 invoked from network); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:32:45 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:32:45 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:33 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support In-reply-to: <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502111932.42951.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:34:10 -0000 --nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 18:07 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi Sharma, > > > Also somwhere I read that MPEG-4 is same as H.263. So does that mean > > that I can use MPEG-4 card for having H.263 support. > > MPEG-4 is a general video description in terms of standards. DivX and > XviD are the non-streaming versions, H.264 is the streaming version of > MPEG-4. H.263 is the streaming version of MPEG-2 and H.261 of MPEG-1. > (please Craig correct me if i'm wrong) Mpeg-4 Part 2 is also known as DivX and Xvid. Although Mpeg-4 offers many=20 things Mpeg-2 does not, especially in terms of higher level object=20 representations, but in reality they don't differ much. The better coding=20 efficiency of Mpeg-4 is only due to some improvements in the details of the= =20 coding scheme. Mpeg-4 has a higher resolution for the motion compensation,= =20 offers different sizes for the motion compensation blocks and some other=20 niceties. H.263 is more or less the same as Mpeg-2, H.263+ is more or less= =20 the same as Mpeg-4 Part 2. Mpeg-4 Part 10 is also known as AVC or H.264 (in contrast to the older=20 standards, MPEG and ITU have created a joint project and the standards are= =20 this time not only similar, but exactly the same). Part 10 is based on the= =20 works of Part 2 and h.263+, so again it is based on the same coding=20 principles (DCT and Motion Compensation), but it offers again more=20 flexibility in the details of coding. It introduces some new ideas like CAB= AC=20 instead of Huffman coding, which seems to be very efficient ... > That's about the same discussion as why Ogg Speex (streaming format) > isn't Ogg Vorbis (non-streaming format). They use the same ideas of > codec design, but have different targets in terms of stream loss and > connection reliability vs. compactation and image quality. Here you are completely wrong. Speex is speech coding. The coding design is= =20 based on a model of speech synthesis - The oscilation of the vocal chord ha= s=20 a fundamental frequency, this fundamental frequency is transmitted, the=20 higher frequencies of the vocal chord are formed by the oral apparatus, whi= ch=20 can be thought of as a filter system, whose coefficients are transferred,=20 too. These principles are used by every speech codec in use. Vorbis (as mp3) are modelled after the human aural system. Quiet tones are= =20 masked by louder tones of a similar frequency, so you have to transfer only= =20 the louder tone. This difference is the reason for music transferred over a speech codec oft= en=20 sounding bad. If the music is similar to spoken language (A solo vocalist, = a=20 single trumpet or even a violin), it sounds quite good, but transferring a= =20 drum or a full band or orchestra wont work well. If a codec is suited for streaming depends most times not on the codec itse= lf,=20 but on the container format (.avi, .mov, .ogg, .mp4). Critical for realtime= =20 streaming (Audio/Video conference, Live TV) are coding delays introduced by= =20 the codec. Hope this clarifys the differences, Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=C3=BCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDPpKb39KPYz+qlMRAuxVAJ9wG/Z2eLrfbWtDxIIkBOhyIPOUywCfas2f 02wiQ5BdTg9HXTPJqrhgj/E= =aBS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4219209.NPWa6kH4Bf-- From franz@iptelenet.com Fri Feb 11 18:44:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046C23B0B49 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:44:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11715-09 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:44:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.iptelenet.com (sql.iptelenet.com [82.133.46.42]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBF93B0DAD for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:44:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from PortegeXP by iptelenet.com (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000044519.msg for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:43:53 +0000 Message-ID: <003b01c51093$8fc2c370$3200a8c0@PortegeXP> From: "Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet)" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: <20050130204629.34721.qmail@web25306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1108124847.8061.215.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Suse 9.2 packages? Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:44:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Authenticated-Sender: franz@iptelenet.com X-Spam-Processed: sql.iptelenet.com, Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:43:53 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.133.46.45 X-Return-Path: franz@iptelenet.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Franz J Ehrengruber \(iptelenet\)" , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:44:18 -0000 > Nothing can say what will happen tomorrow. (Skype) > With GM you have the real Freedom. You can do what you > want with it. Even start you own business around it as long as > you stick to the rules defined by its license. You can expect > this software to work not only today by also tomorrow. Well said Jerome. Regards, Franz. From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 11 23:27:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01D23B0735 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:27:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22995-09 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:27:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE82F3B0061 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:27:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl25 ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:57:41 +0530 Message-ID: <008d01c510bb$1de4f480$1970640a@Samyak.com> From: "asharma" To: , "GnomeMeeting mailing list" References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com><1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> <200502111932.42951.lurch@gmx.li> Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:57:09 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2005 04:27:41.0453 (UTC) FILETIME=[30DB3BD0:01C510BB] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:27:18 -0000 hi, Thanks for this information. So if H.263 is as good as MPEG-2 card, so does that mean that I can have MPEG-2 based card for the support of H.263. Actually my problem is that how to support H.263 codec in GnomemMeeting. Please correct me if I am wrong. And can anyone please tell me any such card. Actually I need to freeze some H/W requirements for this. One more thing related to the Camera Query. It means I have to patch GnomeMeeting for the support of H.263. But I have patched the OpenH323 with the famous ffmpeg library which voxgratia says that it is H.263 codec support. So does that mean that I need to separately patch my GnomeMeeting with H.263 codec support. If yes then can you please tell me from where can I get that patch. And also from the discussion from you and Mr. Kilian I understood that I can have any WebCam/PTZ Cam for my Videoconferencing application which is supported by Linux. Is that true or I am making some mistake. Anyway thanks for the help. Regards, Ashutosh Sharma. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Bruens" To: "GnomeMeeting mailing list" Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 12:02 AM Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > From yochanon@yahoo.com Sat Feb 12 04:48:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD85D3B06F8 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:48:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03523-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:48:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from outbound4.mail.tds.net (outbound4.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605223B06D8 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:48:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from prsstnnas01-pool0-a243.prsstn.tds.net (prsstnnas01-pool0-a243.prsstn.tds.net [69.21.62.243]) by outbound4.mail.tds.net (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j1C9mQNG010871 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:48:27 -0600 (CST) From: JB To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:50:08 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502120350.08819.yochanon@yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Trying to build a SuSE 9.2 rpm, but... X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yochanon@yahoo.com, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:48:30 -0000 Hi gang, I just downloaded the latest tarbal of gnomemeeting and did this in a terminal to try and make a tarball: rpmbuild -ts gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz Unfortunately I'm not very good at this kind of thing, having not done it very many times. This is what was returned: error: Name field must be present in package: (main package) error: Version field must be present in package: (main package) error: Release field must be present in package: (main package) error: Summary field must be present in package: (main package) error: Group field must be present in package: (main package) error: License field must be present in package: (main package) So, if anyone has any ideas what I need to do to fix this to be able to make an rpm out of this, I'd sure be grateful. Remember to try and keep it kinda simple, if possible, heh. Thanks, John From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 07:54:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002963B0D71 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:54:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12958-05 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:54:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2181A3B0D68 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:54:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwn3-00088b-UR for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:26 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwn1-00015E-MY for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <008d01c510bb$1de4f480$1970640a@Samyak.com> References: <01d701c51040$03775230$1970640a@Samyak.com> <1108141634.10165.5.camel@ganymede> <200502111932.42951.lurch@gmx.li> <008d01c510bb$1de4f480$1970640a@Samyak.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1108212863.7324.7.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] OpenH323 + Camera + H.263 card support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:54:31 -0000 --=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharma, > Thanks for this information. So if H.263 is as good as MPEG-2 card, so > does that mean that I can have MPEG-2 based card for the support of H.263= . > Actually my problem is that how to support H.263 codec in GnomemMeeting. > Please correct me if I am wrong. > And can anyone please tell me any such card. > Actually I need to freeze some H/W requirements for this. I'm not aware that any hardware acceleration is currently working with the ffmpeg in OpenH323. But this is the wrong list to ask for this. Maybe Craig can comment on how to use some modern MPEG-2 accelleration of current VGA cards to achieve this (if there is any solution so far). Yet from a GM point of view, that's all within OpenH323 and all GM would do is ask it to send H263 with the video-feed derived from PWLib. Nothing of the transcoding is done in GnomeMeeting, only the user frontend to control the libs is within the GnomeMeeting code (and ILS and stuff - but that's nothing to do with H.263). > One more thing related to the Camera Query. It means I have to patch > GnomeMeeting for the support of H.263. But I have patched the OpenH323 wi= th > the famous ffmpeg library which voxgratia says that it is H.263 codec > support. So does that mean that I need to separately patch my GnomeMeetin= g > with H.263 codec support. If yes then can you please tell me from where c= an > I get that patch. There is no public place where we host it. It gotta be in CVS though and maybe somenoe from this ML still has a copy of it and will share it with you. But yes, you're right that you need both support in OpenH323 to do the actual coding *and* support in GnomeMeeting to ask for this encoding to actually happen. The GnomeMeeting patch is needed to make the handshake recognize H263 as valid local codec (for it's not generic and therefore not "published" alone by patching OpenH323). > And also from the discussion from you and Mr. Kilian I understood that I = can > have any WebCam/PTZ Cam for my Videoconferencing application which is > supported by Linux. Is that true or I am making some mistake. *g* my name is european notation, i.e. Kilian is my first name. ;) Yes, you're right. The video signal is received by whatever comes through pwlib and then fed into OpenH323 for recoding. That means anything that PWLib can display will work (currently V4L, V4L2, AVC and DC cams). None of the WLAN (802.11b/g/a) cams will work and neither will JPEG-cams unless they have a V4L or V4L2 interface driver. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDfx+vdkzt4X+wX8RAroPAJwJTpU7Z9eG2MNQbT0uY6P8ZUapiwCfZdn9 DOpJNfk/AwH+ZhLirNQJJGo= =0e6Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1JKsupgpZCLdadg08S3W-- From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 07:56:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE9C3B09DC for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:56:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12994-06 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:56:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145F83B07B9 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:56:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwor-00089I-B5; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:17 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czwop-000162-CI; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:15 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:15 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: yochanon@yahoo.com, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502120350.08819.yochanon@yahoo.com> References: <200502120350.08819.yochanon@yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:56:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1108212974.7324.10.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Trying to build a SuSE 9.2 rpm, but... X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:56:24 -0000 --=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi John, > rpmbuild -ts gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz we don't ship a *.spec in the tarball. Therefore this won't work. You need to use the src.rpms for your distro if you need to rebuild binary rpms. However we don't recommend building from source as there's a zillion problems around to get rid of for a working GnomeMeeting. Thus if there is a ready-to-be-installed rpm for your distro, please use it. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDfzuvdkzt4X+wX8RAnFPAJ4hTfXNBR9+nNQWKh7kSoNYgNCVNwCfUoHv ty/p5OFokfro8g/Ck3ZxOBI= =9uYF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZFtYm5VwM3idL8WhuiDb-- From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sat Feb 12 09:41:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8954E3B080E for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18830-01 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C634A3B0CBE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from j3c20.j.pppool.de ([85.74.60.32] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzyT2-0001mr-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:41:52 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzyT8-0004mV-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:41:58 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:41:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:41:55 -0000 Damien, Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 15:48 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > 2005/02/09 15:12:02.265 6:17.812 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H225 > > Source signal address ip$119.152.191.172:1720 and TCP peer address > > ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510 indicate remote endpoint is behind NAT > > The remote endpoint is not behind NAT. That's a bug in the openh323 > release shipped with GM 1.2 when using ipv6, it will be fixed when we > release 1.2.1. I am running the standard Debian setup: -> gnomemeeting 1.0.2, -> openh323 1.13.5.4 Do you see any problems with these versions? rdorsch@paddy:~$ dpkg -s gnomemeeting Package: gnomemeeting Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: gnome Installed-Size: 7240 Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo Architecture: i386 Version: 1.0.2-7 Depends: libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.7.2), libaudiofile0 (>= 0.2.3-4), libbonobo2-0 (>= 2.8.0), libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.5.4), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libesd0 (>= 0.2.29-1) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.29-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3), libgconf2-4 (>= 2.8.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.4.7), libgnome2-0 (>= 2.8.0), libgnomecanvas2-0 (>= 2.6.0), libgnomeui-0 (>= 2.8.0), libgnomevfs2-0 (>= 2.8.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.4.4), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libldap2 (>= 2.1.17-1), libopenh323-1.13.2 (>= 1.13.5), liborbit2 (>= 1:2.10.0), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.6.0), libpopt0 (>= 1.7), libpt-1.6.3, libsdl1.2debian (>> 1.2.7+1.2.8), libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxml2 (>= 2.6.11), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), gconf2 (>= 2.6.2-1), libpt-plugins-oss | libpt-plugins-alsa, libpt-plugins-v4l | libpt-plugins-avc | libpt-plugins-dc Recommends: libpt-plugins-alsa, libpt-plugins-v4l, libpt-plugins-avc, libpt-plugins-dc Description: The GnomeMeeting Voice Over IP Suite H.323 compatible videoconferencing and VOIP/IP-Telephony application that allows you to make audio and video calls to remote users with H.323 hardware or software (such as Microsoft Netmeeting). . It supports all modern videoconferencing features, such as registering to an ILS directory, gatekeeper support, making multi-user conference calls using an external MCU, using modern Quicknet telephony cards, and making PC-To-Phone calls. rdorsch@paddy:~$ rdorsch@paddy:~$ dpkg -s libopenh323-1.13.2 Package: libopenh323-1.13.2 Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: libs Installed-Size: 9860 Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team Architecture: i386 Source: openh323 Version: 1.13.5.4-4 > > I'm not sure it triggers the problem as even with that bug, it should > work. > > But I see this : > 2005/02/09 15:12:02.278 6:17.825 H225 Answer:83c0d70 H323 > Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:119.152.191.172]:3510/83 set to > EndedByNoAccept I see that only when I activated forwarding on the workstation. When forwarding is not activated, the call is not ended (by the workstation?). What does this exactly mean? Does my laptop end the forwarding request from the workstation? I can call from my laptop the gnomemeeting on the workstation directly. The other way round I cannot try right now, because I am away from my workstation (except you know how to initiate a gnomemeeting call from the command line). > > I do not know your IP addresses, but I see no forwarding being done. Are The IP address of my laptop is not in the gnomemeeting log on the workstation. The picto of gnomemeeting has the green arrow and gconftool reports that forwarding is enabled: rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/always_forward true rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host 119.145.170.31 rdorsch@paddy:~$ > you sure it is enabled? Hmm...that's harder than I expected. But I learn a lot ;-) Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 09:52:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DF03B0796 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:52:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19441-02 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:52:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649303B076C for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:52:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Czycs-0001H9-Gk for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:02 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czycq-0002Jg-Kq for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:00 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:00 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <1107960484.4368.47.camel@golgoth01> <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:52:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:52:08 -0000 --=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, > I am running the standard Debian setup: > -> gnomemeeting 1.0.2,=20 > -> openh323 1.13.5.4 >=20 > Do you see any problems with these versions? using IPv6: Yes. That's not a flaw of the Debian packaging, but a bug in openh323 that will vanish with the Mimas uploads which aren't yet ready for uploading. the only fix for now is to run without ipv6 or to be called over IPv6. :-P The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDhgQvdkzt4X+wX8RAgIxAJ9Qt9R3GIqAQaHydGyRwd79Jno/eQCeIMjs lNop7X8ffe2DFFbQU766qXI= =2pFL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cpS9yG4GNmnkljaRJUk1-- From jerome@coffeebreaks.org Sat Feb 12 11:22:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0762F3B0B98 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:22:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24176-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:22:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no [62.101.193.41]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C48B3B0AFC for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:22:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from dolcevita.localnet (host-81-191-122-9.bluecom.no [81.191.122.9]) by s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271ED338210 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:22:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dolcevita.localnet) by dolcevita.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D002j-0000Vh-O2 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:22:49 +0100 From: Jerome Lacoste To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CoffeeBreaks Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:22:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1108225369.28263.59.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] SIP interoperability question? GM + VoIP SIP service on same LAN X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:22:55 -0000 Hi, I am about to get a VoIP SIP service at home [1]. Gives me free phone calls from PC to phone all over Europe for a low price. I saw that GM is to support SIP in the close future. I am just wondering what does that mean in terms of interoperability. Could I have conflicts if on the same LAN I have both GnomeMeeting (SIP compatible) and this adapter [2] to which my phone will be connected? Other question: will people with GM be able to call me directly on my phone? (that's probably a question I should keep to my service provider) [1] http://www.telio.no [2] http://www.telio.no/faq/?138 From yochanon@yahoo.com Sat Feb 12 11:44:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C2E3B0B98 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25434-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from web40422.mail.yahoo.com (web40422.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.92.33]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 394E43B0EBF for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 99309 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Feb 2005 16:44:26 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=59TwRLeABLbtX6EmKEvjIBqHtMDx5EHdruqux+NicGbtMv6UWLHPCIa7vzag0vGtNfLvn2xqjlwCkjt/l+FeoHFgP5c8Dw9g6XlfNiFLtlljJc615YUV8raqzCyFiGt0Gi75PDcB/oZmUMQY5k93MOFDqKKYggGwDAoiMLuNEyo= ; Message-ID: <20050212164426.99307.qmail@web40422.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.21.62.150] by web40422.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:44:26 PST Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:44:26 -0800 (PST) From: John Berger Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Trying to build a SuSE 9.2 rpm, but... To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108212974.7324.10.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:44:29 -0000 --- Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi John, > > > rpmbuild -ts gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > we don't ship a *.spec in the tarball. Therefore this won't work. You > need to use the src.rpms for your distro if you need to rebuild binary > rpms. However we don't recommend building from source as there's a > zillion problems around to get rid of for a working GnomeMeeting. Thus > if there is a ready-to-be-installed rpm for your distro, please use it. > > -- > Best regards, > Kilian Aha! I guess that would explain it, heh. Thanks, Kilian. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Sat Feb 12 14:00:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884E93B08B5 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:00:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00433-10 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:00:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1573B08AD for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:00:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from j3c20.j.pppool.de ([85.74.60.32] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D02Uu-0002Gw-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:00:04 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D02Uz-0006BK-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:00:09 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:00:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:00:07 -0000 Hi Kilian, thanks for your quick reply. Am Samstag, 12. Februar 2005 15:52 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi Rainer, > > > I am running the standard Debian setup: > > -> gnomemeeting 1.0.2, > > -> openh323 1.13.5.4 > > > > Do you see any problems with these versions? > > using IPv6: Yes. That's not a flaw of the Debian packaging, but a bug in > openh323 that will vanish with the Mimas uploads which aren't yet ready > for uploading. the only fix for now is to run without ipv6 or to be > called over IPv6. :-P Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem comes up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make sense for you? > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest version is 1.12.2 On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 What version I should watch out for? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 12 21:27:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5C83B1014 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:27:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20654-02 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:27:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428B13B1009 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:27:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D09UE-0007uJ-89 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:50 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D09UC-0001X9-EN for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:48 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:48 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502121541.56223.rdorsch@web.de> <1108219920.7324.32.camel@ganymede> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:27:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:27:53 -0000 --=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, > Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem com= es=20 > up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make sense f= or=20 > you? as long as IPv4 notation-compatibility notation in IPv6 is used, there will be problems. Thus if your forwarding is to an ipv4 host, yes. > > > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). >=20 > I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest=20 > version is 1.12.2 >=20 > On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 >=20 > What version I should watch out for? For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these days to get the autobuilder script back online. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCDrsjvdkzt4X+wX8RAs0KAJ9m7xweM0AbdTn9EmjJMUkjyNy34ACZAUGd NkZgTfOSP9VvUAUxYJOLnLQ= =oY6l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bIdzXCw2k/ySGwoPySsZ-- From xtinab@web.de Sun Feb 13 12:54:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1773B0E23 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:54:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03690-08 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:54:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from fmmailgate04.web.de (fmmailgate04.web.de [217.72.192.242]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1435A3B0932 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:54:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by fmmailgate04.web.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/webde Linux 0.7) with SMTP id j1DHrJ2o016010 for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:54:20 +0100 Received: from [80.109.10.151] by freemailng1703.web.de with HTTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:54:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:54:15 +0100 Message-Id: <400064069@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Christina Boeckler" To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Precedence: fm-user Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] dsp0 opened but not readable X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:54:24 -0000 hi i just installed gnomemeeting on my intel-debian box and i get this error, when i use oss - the other option quicknet does not find any devices, alsa is not available, although installed : Cannot use the audio device The selected audio device (/dev/dsp0) was successfully opened but it is impossible to read data from this device. Please check your audio setup. in the faq i read, that another program is blocking my soundcard, but there is no other prog running, as ps shows the rights for /dev/dsp0 are set correctly, as my user is member of the group audio, which has rw rights and normally sound works - xmms at least. any idea, where i can look further ? thanx tina __________________________________________________________ Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min. weltweit telefonieren! http://freephone.web.de/?mc=021201 From jerome@coffeebreaks.org Sun Feb 13 13:05:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615CB3B10E0 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:05:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04311-02 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no [62.101.193.41]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CB33B0E22 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:05:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from dolcevita.localnet (host-81-191-122-9.bluecom.no [81.191.122.9]) by s-smtp-osl-02.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3CD338391 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:05:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dolcevita.localnet) by dolcevita.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0O7G-0001Te-Lu for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:05:06 +0100 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dsp0 opened but not readable From: Jerome Lacoste To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <400064069@web.de> References: <400064069@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CoffeeBreaks Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:05:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1108317906.28263.67.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:05:14 -0000 On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 18:54 +0100, Christina Boeckler wrote: > hi > > i just installed gnomemeeting on my intel-debian box and i get this error, when i use oss - the other option quicknet does not find any devices, alsa is not available, although installed : > > Cannot use the audio device > > The selected audio device (/dev/dsp0) was successfully opened but it is impossible to read data from this device. Please check your audio setup. > > in the faq i read, that another program is blocking my soundcard, but there is no other prog running, as ps shows Do you base this last comment on ps output? Have you tried to use fuser? fuser /dev/dsp0 Jerome From kk@verfaction.de Sun Feb 13 14:17:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3CB3B0867 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:17:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07144-05 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:17:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690493B06E6 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D0PFZ-0007Ml-El for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:45 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0PFX-0000yI-GB for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:43 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:43 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <400064069@web.de> References: <400064069@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:17:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1108322263.11658.35.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] dsp0 opened but not readable X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:17:50 -0000 --=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Christina, > any idea, where i can look further ? if you have setup ALSA without OSS emulation, then try installing libpt-plugins-alsa and use that. If you only have OSS drivers installed it's recommended anyway to upgrade them to ALSA for OSS doesn't do recording and playback at the same time. The only way to make OSS in GnomeMeeting work for most drivers is to use OSS-emulation for ALSA. Jos=E9 Carlos Garc=EDa Sogo reckons that OSS is however mandantory to be th= e primary recommend audio plugin for SARGE ships with OSS drivers as default (even though those drivers for the vast majority won't work with GnomeMeeting). Details on ALSA are in /usr/share/doc/gnomemeeting/README.Debian. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCD6fXvdkzt4X+wX8RAnlLAJ9dvWfX3Q0ItRauYY+NTKmz4Z8p9QCbBhX/ 7+AvUgL0yUId0K3QzyI1n9k= =KOwE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X6ZVc96L8CBdfDYtmPFz-- From dsandras@seconix.com Sun Feb 13 14:32:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7E23B1032 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:32:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07873-02 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:32:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAB63B1126 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:31:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (8-98.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.98.8]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67ED1B3FE for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:34:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SIP interoperability question? GM + VoIP SIP service on same LAN From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108225369.28263.59.camel@dolcevita.localnet> References: <1108225369.28263.59.camel@dolcevita.localnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:31:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1108323103.3182.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:32:12 -0000 Le samedi 12 février 2005 à 17:22 +0100, Jerome Lacoste a écrit : > Hi, I am about to get a VoIP SIP service at home [1]. Gives me free > phone calls from PC to phone all over Europe for a low price. > > I saw that GM is to support SIP in the close future. I am just wondering > what does that mean in terms of interoperability. > > Could I have conflicts if on the same LAN I have both GnomeMeeting (SIP > compatible) and this adapter [2] to which my phone will be connected? > I think not. > > Other question: will people with GM be able to call me directly on my > phone? (that's probably a question I should keep to my service provider) > Yes, it should work, but it depends on your provider. But technically, it is possible. > > [1] http://www.telio.no > [2] http://www.telio.no/faq/?138 > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From ajtim@ctel.net Sun Feb 13 20:12:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EED3B0D82 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26455-10 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from a.smtp.taconic.net (outgoing-1.taconic.net [205.231.144.133]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB89F3B0F62 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:23 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 4254 invoked by uid 0); 14 Feb 2005 01:12:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (216.227.92.50) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 01:12:23 -0000 From: Mitja To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:12:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:12:37 -0000 Hi! My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. GM didn't recognize my sound card. I don't have a problem with other applications. Please help me. Thanks, Mitja From 1.41421@gmail.com Mon Feb 14 02:05:34 2005 Return-Path: <1.41421@gmail.com> X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305A93B120D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:05:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08930-07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:05:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923013B120C for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:05:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so573493wra for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I+ZN0X790v37h36IR9z2pwf07PZENXihAtflHvu6JTNWfHYBqP24hqA+mieovYx//nwG0wuZKZv3jikLAQN4r9xwbA0+JN8cBhMu7a9ptd3LlUVjmzGyPnZxTMmzLi6scpKl7ceUdGJLy+6C7yswpDQan6wG68hPPg+qjE06gZY= Received: by 10.54.41.16 with SMTP id o16mr10825wro; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.7.13 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 -0800 From: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com>, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:05:34 -0000 I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? Feedback will be much appreciated. From fujimori@ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp Mon Feb 14 02:13:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F493B11C1 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:13:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09263-07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:13:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp [133.9.152.153]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0E93B120D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:12:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (8.12.10/8.11.3) with ESMTP id j1E7CLfN055726; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:12:21 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from fujimori@ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp) Message-Id: <200502140712.j1E7CLfN055726@ns.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp> To: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com>, GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:05:17 PST." Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:12:21 +0900 From: Yoriaki FUJIMORI X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:13:24 -0000 I am interesting in what you would like to do eventually. yoriaki fujimori From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 14 03:26:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C922D3B1228 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:26:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12748-01 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:26:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280F43B0B40 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:26:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0F01B2DB; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:30:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , ajtim@ctel.net In-Reply-To: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:26:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:26:54 -0000 Le dimanche 13 février 2005 à 20:12 -0500, Mitja a écrit : > Hi! > > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. > > GM didn't recognize my sound card. I don't have a problem with other > applications. > Please help me. > Can you be more precise? I don't understand what "didn't recognize my soundcard" means? Also, what audio plugin are you using? > Thanks, > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 14 03:28:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D6B3B1228 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:28:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12886-04 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:28:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BEF3B130A for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:28:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34902C475; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:31:54 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:28:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:28:47 -0000 Le dimanche 13 février 2005 à 23:05 -0800, JCA a écrit : > I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same > LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not > and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it > be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the > gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? > > The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be > done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far > without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the > sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the > opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike > connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? > > Feedback will be much appreciated. ESD and Arts would solve the problem, but the fact is that they are both of very bad quality when it comes to capture/playback at the same time. They are thus unusable with GnomeMeeting. You probably have to use other sound daemons, with low-latency, like MAS or Jack. In that case, you will have to code a plugin for GnomeMeeting supporting the sound daemon of your choice. Hope it helps, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From sime@anticd.org Mon Feb 14 06:26:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAFB3B13BE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:26:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24155-07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:26:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.193]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3D63B138D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:26:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (c211-30-187-243.rivrw1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.187.243]) by mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1EBPv78029049; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:25:58 +1100 Message-ID: <42108AC9.4050307@anticd.org> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:26:01 +1100 From: Simon Males User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> In-Reply-To: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:26:11 -0000 > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. You'll OSS drivers. Guessing but I think libpt-plugins-oss does the trick. -- Simon Males No More AOL CDs Australia - www.anticd.org From ajtim@ctel.net Mon Feb 14 09:13:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC4D3B1343 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02071-10 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from c.smtp.taconic.net (outgoing.taconic.net [205.231.144.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3EB83B1339 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:04 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 16590 invoked by uid 0); 14 Feb 2005 14:13:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (216.227.92.85) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 14:13:03 -0000 From: Mitja To: Damien Sandras Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:13:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502140913.12840.ajtim@ctel.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:13:08 -0000 On Monday 14 February 2005 03:26, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le dimanche 13 f=E9vrier 2005 =E0 20:12 -0500, Mitja a =E9crit : > > Hi! > > > > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. > > > > GM didn't recognize my sound card. I don't have a problem with other > > applications. > > Please help me. > > Can you be more precise? I don't understand what "didn't recognize my > soundcard" means? > > Also, what audio plugin are you using? > > > Thanks, GnomeMeeting ''said'' that i don't have a sound card. I have a sound card a= nd=20 works. I use ALSA. From kk@verfaction.de Mon Feb 14 09:16:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0403B1387 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02494-02 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A85A3B13A6 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D0h1C-0002dj-Ji; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:06 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0h1A-0003mo-Or; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:04 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:04 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502140913.12840.ajtim@ctel.net> References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> <1108369611.3363.10.camel@golgoth01> <200502140913.12840.ajtim@ctel.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1108390564.5525.41.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:16:21 -0000 --=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mitja, > GnomeMeeting ''said'' that i don't have a sound card. I have a sound card= and=20 > works. I use ALSA. and you don't have the pwlib alsa plugin installed. Fix that and it'll work, i.e. install the pwlib-plugins-alsa rpm. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCELKkvdkzt4X+wX8RApDVAJ4oB1XAFHdeaM+vkBGdKoleQX3c6ACfaQUu F2mm1Y4MDs92r23SHYIokT4= =XKrJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HSMu+VNnr9fg9ed3O+7Z-- From lurch@gmx.li Mon Feb 14 14:06:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822453B118E for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:06:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21919-05 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:06:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7083B07DA for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:05:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IBX0020511YSH@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1EJ5vYM020058 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:57 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 10155 invoked from network); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:05:57 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:05:57 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:49 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] SB Live In-reply-to: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> To: ajtim@ctel.net, GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502142005.55335.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502132012.30977.ajtim@ctel.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:06:11 -0000 --nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 02:12 schrieb Mitja: > Hi! > > My system: SuSE 9.2 Pro, KDE 3.3.2, SB Live and GnomeMeeting 1.2. Where did you get the RPMs (GM, pwlib, h323) from? 9.2 does not ship GM 1.2. Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCEPaTb39KPYz+qlMRAjlSAKCh+hH6NCoAgWD0gBpBomCn4qwE8ACeIyoJ SrIwgQutWJtkgs742GcqQx4= =9He3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart15841253.adQBVrH3Ua-- From 1.41421@gmail.com Mon Feb 14 14:14:41 2005 Return-Path: <1.41421@gmail.com> X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA3B3B140C for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:14:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22356-03 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:14:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724663B0A72 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:14:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so670322wra for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=O/O293+uUj9CPYGjbbrPjRW2YnFj50hmG1gnW8IPaLNkIYa+O84KBXfLXDGQJs1s9dr+KSvK1CbScZZ3E/84yfh9dD7wYrtVaz4j9JceVgaCOSwmo+q6ObLFlK4zvGNQawBoiY8DPfYQgq3R9vZzqawpshFu7EwnN4/1EBgstmM= Received: by 10.54.16.9 with SMTP id 9mr204409wrp; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.7.13 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:37 -0800 From: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> To: Damien Sandras Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting In-Reply-To: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: JCA <1.41421@gmail.com>, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:14:41 -0000 On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:28:32 +0100, Damien Sandras w= rote: > Le dimanche 13 f=E9vrier 2005 =E0 23:05 -0800, JCA a =E9crit : > > I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same > > LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not > > and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it > > be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the > > gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? > > > > The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be > > done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far > > without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the > > sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the > > opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike > > connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? > > > > Feedback will be much appreciated. >=20 > ESD and Arts would solve the problem, but the fact is that they are both > of very bad quality when it comes to capture/playback at the same time. > They are thus unusable with GnomeMeeting. >=20 > You probably have to use other sound daemons, with low-latency, like MAS > or Jack. In that case, you will have to code a plugin for GnomeMeeting > supporting the sound daemon of your choice. >=20 > Hope it helps, Thanks for your feedback. Well, this is a bit of a bummer, for I do not think I have the necessary expertise to develop the necessary plugin :-( Oh, well. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 14 14:20:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E533B15BC for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:20:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22779-06 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:19:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F7C3B15B4 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (175-84.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.84.175]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73504B5C6; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:23:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Remote gnomemeeting From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , JCA <1.41421@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1108369712.3363.13.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:19:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1108408796.3179.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:20:00 -0000 We will probably have a JACK plugin at some point, but I can not tell when exactly :-/ Le lundi 14 février 2005 à 11:14 -0800, JCA a écrit : > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:28:32 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le dimanche 13 février 2005 à 23:05 -0800, JCA a écrit : > > > I have the following setup: Two computers (A and B) on the same > > > LAN, both with direct internet access. A runs gnomemeeting, B does not > > > and (no matter why) can't run gnomemeeting. The question is, would it > > > be possible to launch gnomemeeting from A, in such a way that all the > > > gnomemeeting interaction can be done at B? > > > > > > The visual stuff is easy, because B runs X. Can the same thing be > > > done for the sound? I tried to use esddsp for that purpose, so far > > > without success. Also, although I think it might work as far as the > > > sound being networked from A to B, I am more doubtful about the > > > opposite direction. That is, could the sound captured in B, via a mike > > > connected to B's sound board, be routed to A? > > > > > > Feedback will be much appreciated. > > > > ESD and Arts would solve the problem, but the fact is that they are both > > of very bad quality when it comes to capture/playback at the same time. > > They are thus unusable with GnomeMeeting. > > > > You probably have to use other sound daemons, with low-latency, like MAS > > or Jack. In that case, you will have to code a plugin for GnomeMeeting > > supporting the sound daemon of your choice. > > > > Hope it helps, > > Thanks for your feedback. Well, this is a bit of a bummer, for I do > not think I have the necessary expertise to develop the necessary > plugin :-( Oh, well. > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 03:58:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020233B1024 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:58:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07791-05 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:58:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342B73B0FED for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:58:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:28:53 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:28:16 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 08:58:53.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[127DBE10:01C51598] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:58:22 -0000 Hello All, I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 Gateway at my place. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh. From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 18 04:11:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F8C3B1044 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:11:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08868-09 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:11:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D4F3B0FD7 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:11:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCD11B32A for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:15:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:11:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:11:42 -0000 Hello, If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work with GnomeMeeting : a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. Hope it helps, Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hello All, > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > Gateway at my place. > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh. > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 04:51:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDDF3B0957 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:51:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11398-03 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:51:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8563B08B5 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:51:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:21:49 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:21:11 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 09:51:49.0437 (UTC) FILETIME=[773C96D0:01C5159F] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:51:15 -0000 Thanks sir. That was really helpful. =20 Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec only. SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). Also I got to know from your response that there are two service providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to know that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean I want a scenario to be like this:-=20 PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <=3D=3D>My ISP <=3D=3D=3D>Phone(P= OT/PSTN) Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > Hello, >=20 >=20 > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. >=20 > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > with GnomeMeeting : > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. >=20 > Hope it helps, >=20 > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a = =C3=A9crit : > > Hello All, > >=20 > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this.=20 > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > Gateway at my place. > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > > Ashutosh.=20 > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 18 05:05:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B753B0DC4 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12185-06 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08C73B0DB3 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:03:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6448C1B364 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:07:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:03:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:05:10 -0000 Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Thanks sir. > That was really helpful. > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > only. > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to know > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean > I want a scenario to be like this:- > > PC (GM) <===>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <==>My ISP <===>Phone(POT/PSTN) > Here is what you can have : PC (GM) <====> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <==> Your telco provider <====> Phone OR PC (GM) <====> PC-To-Phone provider <====> Phone > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh Sharma. > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. > > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > > with GnomeMeeting : > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > > > Hope it helps, > > > > Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > > Gateway at my place. > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 05:17:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5CC3B0C92 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:17:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13166-09 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36733B0A39 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:48:01 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:47:23 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 10:18:01.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[1FF61280:01C515A3] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:17:28 -0000 Yeah thanks. Definitely h/w is must. I mean I will be mostly going for Quicknet PhoneJack. So this means that I can use the services of My ISP with this GM and h/w. But what I asked about the OpenH323 PSTN Gateway codec support was that correct (if you can throw some light on that) or not? On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a = =C3=A9crit : > > Thanks sir. > > That was really helpful. =20 > > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 code= c > > only. > > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" > > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway > > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all > > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). > >=20 >=20 > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which > you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? >=20 > > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to kno= w > > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if > > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean > > I want a scenario to be like this:-=20 > >=20 > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <=3D=3D>My ISP <=3D=3D=3D>Pho= ne(POT/PSTN) > >=20 >=20 > Here is what you can have : >=20 > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <=3D=3D> Your= telco > provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone >=20 > OR >=20 > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> PC-To-Phone provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone >=20 > > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Hello, > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions= : > > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for examp= le > > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when yo= u > > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. > > >=20 > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able= to > > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are us= ing > > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > > > with GnomeMeeting : > > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > >=20 > > > Hope it helps, > > >=20 > > > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=83=C2=A9vrier 2005 =C3=83 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh = Sharma a =C3=83=C2=A9crit : > > > > Hello All, > > > >=20 > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeet= ing. > > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this.=20 > > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > > > Gateway at my place. > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Ashutosh.=20 > > > >=20 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 18 05:20:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980093B0A39 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:20:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13335-08 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:19:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAAB3B0E96 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B80A874 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:23:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:19:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:20:03 -0000 Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 15:47 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Yeah thanks. > Definitely h/w is must. I mean I will be mostly going for Quicknet > PhoneJack. So this means that I can use the services of My ISP with this > GM and h/w. Is your ISP also offering a normal phone line? > But what I asked about the OpenH323 PSTN Gateway codec support was that > correct (if you can throw some light on that) or not? > Yes it should be. Pay attention to the fact that there is no driver yet for kernel 2.6 for Quicknet cards. A more complicated alternative is to use Asterisk (www.asterisk.org). > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le vendredi 18 février 2005 Ã 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > Thanks sir. > > > That was really helpful. > > > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > > > only. > > > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabilities" > > > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gateway > > > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose all > > > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version). > > > > > > > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which > > you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? > > > > > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > > > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to know > > > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because if > > > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I mean > > > I want a scenario to be like this:- > > > > > > PC (GM) <===>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <==>My ISP <===>Phone(POT/PSTN) > > > > > > > Here is what you can have : > > > > PC (GM) <====> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <==> Your telco > > provider <====> Phone > > > > OR > > > > PC (GM) <====> PC-To-Phone provider <====> Phone > > > > > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solutions : > > > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for example > > > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than when you > > > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line. > > > > > > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be able to > > > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several countries > > > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you are using > > > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to work > > > > with GnomeMeeting : > > > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That codec is > > > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls using > > > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That will > > > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug a > > > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM as > > > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard and a > > > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > > > > > > > Hope it helps, > > > > > > > > Le vendredi 18 février 2005 Ã 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through GnomeMeeting. > > > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this. > > > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be having an > > > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing calls. > > > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have OpenH323 > > > > > Gateway at my place. > > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > Ashutosh. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Fri Feb 18 06:41:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D679A3B0FAB for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:41:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18024-07 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:41:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5105D3B1058 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:41:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:11:57 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:11:19 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2005 11:41:57.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA012C90:01C515AE] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:41:23 -0000 Hi, Well that's true. But I think Asterix supports oh323 not OpenH323. I mean will it make any difference if I use OpenH323 + GM + OpenMCU+GnuGK+ Asterix PBX. I saw that whole code is in 'C' only. And its really a complex s/w. I hardly could understand a pin point of things from the help. Anyhow but how can I make call from GM (0.98) to a phone using Asterix. I mean whether I have to register it as application with Asterix. Truly speaking I don't understand that application registration funda. Thanks and Regards, Ashutosh. =20 On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:49, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 15:47 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a = =C3=A9crit : > > Yeah thanks. > > Definitely h/w is must. I mean I will be mostly going for Quicknet > > PhoneJack. So this means that I can use the services of My ISP with thi= s > > GM and h/w. >=20 > Is your ISP also offering a normal phone line? >=20 > > But what I asked about the OpenH323 PSTN Gateway codec support was that > > correct (if you can throw some light on that) or not? > >=20 >=20 > Yes it should be. Pay attention to the fact that there is no driver yet > for kernel 2.6 for Quicknet cards. >=20 > A more complicated alternative is to use Asterisk (www.asterisk.org). >=20 > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=83=C2=A9vrier 2005 =C3=83 15:21 +0530, Ashutosh = Sharma a =C3=83=C2=A9crit : > > > > Thanks sir. > > > > That was really helpful. =20 > > > > Sorry to bother you, but some more questions. > > > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I lo= oked > > > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 = codec > > > > only. > > > > SO what I did that I added all capabilities using "AddAllcapabiliti= es" > > > > function with (0,0,"*"). So does this means that now this PSTN Gate= way > > > > is able to support PC-to-Phone calls on all audio codecs (I suppose= all > > > > codecs means whatever the codecs that are there in OpenH323 version= ). > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > To support PC-To-Phone using that software you need hardware in which > > > you will plug your normal phone line. How could it work otherwise? > > >=20 > > > > Also I got to know from your response that there are two service > > > > providers which can provide services via GM, but I am interested to= know > > > > that why can't I use my Service Provider for that using GM, because= if > > > > we talk about NET2Phone,then in that also my ISP can be anyone. I = mean > > > > I want a scenario to be like this:-=20 > > > >=20 > > > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D>OpenH323 based GATEWAY <=3D=3D>My ISP <=3D=3D=3D= >Phone(POT/PSTN) > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Here is what you can have : > > >=20 > > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> OpenH323 based GATEWAY with Hardware <=3D=3D> = Your telco > > > provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone > > >=20 > > > OR > > >=20 > > > PC (GM) <=3D=3D=3D=3D> PC-To-Phone provider <=3D=3D=3D=3D> Phone > > >=20 > > > > Sorry if my question seems to be absurd. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 14:41, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > If you want to make PC-To-Phone calls, you have basically 3 solut= ions : > > > > > 1) Build your own gateway, connected to the landline, using for e= xample > > > > > Asterisk. With that solution, you will pay the same rate than whe= n you > > > > > are using your classical phone as you will be using your own line= . > > > > >=20 > > > > > 2) Build a PC-To-Phone account from a provider. You will then be = able to > > > > > phone at cheaper rates as they have terminations in several count= ries > > > > > and it is thus cheaper to do international calls than when you ar= e using > > > > > your own line. There are 2 providers (and perhaps more) known to = work > > > > > with GnomeMeeting : > > > > > a) MicroTelco: They support only G.723.1 as codec. That code= c is > > > > > patented and doesn't exist on Linux. The only way to do calls usi= ng > > > > > G.723.1 using GnomeMeeting is thus to buy a Quicknet card. That w= ill > > > > > permit you to use G.723.1 (which comes with the card) and to plug= a > > > > > normal phone in the card and use it with GnomeMeeting. > > > > > b) The GnomeMeeting 1.2 provider: They support G.711 and GSM= as > > > > > codecs, you can do PC-To-Phone calls using only your soundcard an= d a > > > > > headset. You need GnomeMeeting 1.2, there is a special window to > > > > > register a PC-To-Phone account to this provider. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Hope it helps, > > > > >=20 > > > > > Le vendredi 18 f=C3=83=C6=92=C3=82=C2=A9vrier 2005 =C3=83=C6=92 = 14:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a =C3=83=C6=92=C3=82=C2=A9crit : > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I am having a doubt regarding PC-to-Phone Calls through Gnome= Meeting. > > > > > > Is this necessary to buy a MicroTelco account for doing this.=20 > > > > > > If I am connected to the Internet, so obviously I will be havin= g an > > > > > > account from my ISP. So can't I use that account for doing call= s. > > > > > > And in that scenario, if I am not wrong then I should have Open= H323 > > > > > > Gateway at my place. > > > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > Ashutosh.=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > > >=20 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From devel@tootai.net Fri Feb 18 10:37:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3663B113D for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:37:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00712-06 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:37:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from mango.tootai.net (mango.tootai.net [217.11.129.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F0E3B108A for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:37:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (rob67-1-82-231-69-24.fbx.proxad.net [82.231.69.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by mango.tootai.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id j1IFawqI031817 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:36:59 +0100 Message-ID: <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:42:41 +0100 From: daniel huhardeaux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> In-Reply-To: <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:37:04 -0000 Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : >Hi, > Well that's true. But I think Asterix supports oh323 not OpenH323. I >mean will it make any difference if I use OpenH323 + GM + OpenMCU+GnuGK+ >Asterix PBX. > I saw that whole code is in 'C' only. And its really a complex s/w. I >hardly could understand a pin point of things from the help. > Anyhow but how can I make call from GM (0.98) to a phone using >Asterix. I mean whether I have to register it as application with >Asterix. Truly speaking I don't understand that application registration >funda. > > Asterisk has two h323 channels. I would suggest you to use the oh323 one's. Or you connect your GnuGK gatekeeper to asterisk via the oh323 channel, or you connect GM directly. In this case you will not be able to call to asterisk EndPoints with other h323 Endpoints connected to your GK. -- Daniel Huhardeaux ______ _____ _____ ______ ______ __ enum +48 32 285 5276 /_ _// _ // _ //_ _// __ // / IAX FWD +1 7009 422493 / / / // // // / / / / /_/ // / sip:101 h323:121 @voip./_/ /____//____/ /_/ /_/ /_//_/.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Fri Feb 18 18:23:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBB13B0AD2 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:23:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27081-03 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:23:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875143B0945 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:23:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from j128b.j.pppool.de ([85.74.18.139] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D2HSe-0001Yl-00 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:23:00 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D2HSq-0001GU-00 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:23:12 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:23:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502190023.12048.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:23:05 -0000 Hi Kilian, Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > days to get the autobuilder script back online. testing the debs would be ok for me. I am running an uptodate sarge. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 19 10:03:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3CF3B0789 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06898-10 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:03:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B9C3B0703 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:03:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499] (helo=[IPv6:3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499]) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D2W8z-0002Pe-MX for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:03:41 +0100 From: Kilian Krause To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:03:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1108825419.7144.13.camel@mars> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:03:45 -0000 --=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharma, [snip] > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > only. quoting Craig Southeren PSTNgw is phased out already. At least that was the info i got some days ago. You should thus use something like aefirion, asterisk, yate or isdnh323. Whatever your needs are. YMMV. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCF1VLvdkzt4X+wX8RAiLFAJwKrpe4cHI/j/4Ov66LIwg0ooIOhgCfdqCy w1Sh/YuPjkMFzYY8POHgjMk= =bwZZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-y6yejC4Ro8t9WSA5Eoyv-- From kk@verfaction.de Sat Feb 19 10:06:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F433B06DD for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07180-03 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:06:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3F53B0703 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:06:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499] (helo=[IPv6:3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499]) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D2WBu-0002Rz-1W for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:06:42 +0100 From: Kilian Krause To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502190023.12048.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> <200502190023.12048.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:06:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1108825601.7144.16.camel@mars> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357:204:23ff:fe4e:d499 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:06:45 -0000 --=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, Am Samstag, den 19.02.2005, 00:23 +0100 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > Hi Kilian, >=20 > Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously nee= d > > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > > days to get the autobuilder script back online. >=20 > testing the debs would be ok for me. I am running an uptodate sarge. the preliminary debs were built on a SID and will for now not install on SARGE afair. I hope i get the time to build sarge ones tomorrow or so. Will keep you posted as i have some ready (or verified that sarge has the required GNOME package dependencies by now - which it hadn't yet last time i tried) --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCF1YBvdkzt4X+wX8RAvx2AJ9cKjyvIkHMuT1CmVOjMox4yx3fdACfSpYK eYyIZ0AVJC1mXe2Bbro0pDs= =z7De -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aJmXiLw5qiIQVblwBZ9J-- From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 21 00:26:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5DA3B0716 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22868-04 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780BA3B07C2 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:57:03 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:56:26 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2005 05:27:03.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9F17130:01C517D5] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:26:29 -0000 Hi Thanks, So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem is to have the s/w packages in C++. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 21:12, daniel huhardeaux wrote: > Ashutosh Sharma a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > >Hi, > > Well that's true. But I think Asterix supports oh323 not OpenH323. I > >mean will it make any difference if I use OpenH323 + GM + OpenMCU+GnuGK+ > >Asterix PBX. > > I saw that whole code is in 'C' only. And its really a complex s/w. I > >hardly could understand a pin point of things from the help. > > Anyhow but how can I make call from GM (0.98) to a phone using > >Asterix. I mean whether I have to register it as application with > >Asterix. Truly speaking I don't understand that application registration > >funda. > > =20 > > > Asterisk has two h323 channels. I would suggest you to use the oh323=20 > one's. Or you connect your GnuGK gatekeeper to asterisk via the oh323=20 > channel, or you connect GM directly. In this case you will not be able=20 > to call to asterisk EndPoints with other h323 Endpoints connected to=20 > your GK. From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 21 00:28:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEEC3B07C7 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:28:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23044-03 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:28:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1D23B075E for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:28:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:58:44 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108825419.7144.13.camel@mars> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108825419.7144.13.camel@mars> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108963687.3994.13.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:58:07 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2005 05:28:44.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[36298CA0:01C517D6] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:28:06 -0000 hi. Thanks, Well do you mean to say that PSTNgw is outdated now. Regards, A. Sharma. On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 20:33, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Sharma, > > [snip] > > > Actually I have downloaded the Open H.323 PSTN Gateway. I looked > > into the source code and found that it supports only GSM and G.711 codec > > only. > > quoting Craig Southeren PSTNgw is phased out already. At least that was > the info i got some days ago. You should thus use something like > aefirion, asterisk, yate or isdnh323. Whatever your needs are. YMMV. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 21 04:01:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25623B1472 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:01:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32342-08 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:01:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBC23B15AE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:01:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9A41B598 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:06:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:01:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:01:38 -0000 Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi Thanks, > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and chan-h323. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 21 04:13:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39EF3B1636 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:13:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00800-10 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:13:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118013B1626 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:43:44 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1108977185.3994.31.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:43:05 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2005 09:13:44.0515 (UTC) FILETIME=[A48E6930:01C517F5] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:13:43 -0000 yeah thanks, This means I can use all the features of Asterix for my OpenH323 based conferencing part. So as you mentioned it gives 2 channels. So this means that the programmer is having liberty to choose anyone. Also if I use Asterix or any other MediaG/W, then whether I need to change the source code for GnomeMeeting. I guess no. I have also seen PSTNgw and also read the features of Yate. Well but it doesn't seem that Yate supports quicknet h/w. So I am left with PSTNgw/Asterix only. Isn't this so? But in the previous mails I found that PSTNgw is outdated now. Is it so? Actually confusion gets create when you saw a lot of such projects and some supports the features that you need and some don't. Please guide me in this context. Thanks, Ashutosh Sharma. On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:31, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 21 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a =C3= =A9crit : > > Hi Thanks, > > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > >=20 >=20 > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and > chan-h323. From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 21 04:30:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88D53B0C16 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:30:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02087-01 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:30:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1273B0A29 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:30:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041D21B4CA for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:35:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Question regarding PC-to-Phone Calls From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1108977185.3994.31.camel@sipl25> References: <1108717096.3990.13.camel@sipl25> <1108717896.3579.9.camel@golgoth01> <1108720271.3990.29.camel@sipl25> <1108721010.3579.21.camel@golgoth01> <1108721843.3990.37.camel@sipl25> <1108721996.3579.32.camel@golgoth01> <1108726879.3990.45.camel@sipl25> <42160CF1.2000809@tootai.net> <1108963586.3994.10.camel@sipl25> <1108976492.3411.17.camel@golgoth01> <1108977185.3994.31.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:30:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1108978228.3411.32.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:30:30 -0000 Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 14:43 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > yeah thanks, > This means I can use all the features of Asterix for my OpenH323 based > conferencing part. So as you mentioned it gives 2 channels. So this > means that the programmer is having liberty to choose anyone. Also if I > use Asterix or any other MediaG/W, then whether I need to change the > source code for GnomeMeeting. I guess no. > no, gnomemeeting is an H.323 client, it will work with H.323 "servers". > I have also seen PSTNgw and also read the features of Yate. Well but > it doesn't seem that Yate supports quicknet h/w. So I am left with > PSTNgw/Asterix only. Isn't this so? But in the previous mails I found > that PSTNgw is outdated now. Is it so? > I don't know about that, but that's possible. Asterisk can use Quicknet hardware. > Actually confusion gets create when you saw a lot of such projects and > some supports the features that you need and some don't. > > Please guide me in this context. > Thanks, > Ashutosh Sharma. > > On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:31, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > Hi Thanks, > > > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > > > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > > > > > > > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and > > chan-h323. > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be Tue Feb 22 07:12:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70773B070D for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:12:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13878-02 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:12:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from spoolo3.tiscali.be (spoolo3.tiscali.be [62.235.13.169]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3311B3B0688 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:12:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [83.134.222.80] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by spoolo3.tiscali.be with esmtp (Tiscali.be http://www.tiscali.be) id 1D3YuN-00042e-Eg for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:12:55 +0100 Message-ID: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:15:42 +0000 From: Thierry Lepoint User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050221 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:59 -0000 Hello all, I installed GnomeMeeting-1.2.0 (Gentoo) in order to take advantge of the new PC-to-phone system. I obtained a regitration and a PIN numbers from "diamondcard.us". I encoded them in the configuration page of Gnomemeeting. How can I get a call to 32-2-5267356 (my office) in Belgium? My second question is that I have no access to the manual (in Help, "sommaire" is not activated). Many thanks in advance to take these question into account. Thierry -- web site : http://www.first30.org H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 22 07:22:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5933B09F6 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:22:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14371-04 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:22:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8006C3B0A3E for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:22:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5281B2C8 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:26:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> References: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:22:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:22:10 -0000 Hi, Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 14:15 +0000, Thierry Lepoint a écrit : > Hello all, > > I installed GnomeMeeting-1.2.0 (Gentoo) in order to take advantge of the > new PC-to-phone system. > I obtained a regitration and a PIN numbers from "diamondcard.us". I > encoded them in the configuration page of Gnomemeeting. > You need to get them from the GnomeMeeting window, not by direct access, but it seems correct for you. > How can I get a call to 32-2-5267356 (my office) in Belgium? > First thing is to check that your NAT configuration is correct and that you can do calls using GnomeMeeting and not the PC-To-Phone provider. Then, you can go in the preferences, Gatekeeper Settings, Choose "Gatekeeper Host" are registering method, click on Apply. When you see that you are registered in the general history, you are ready to do calls. Just call h323:003225267356 and it will work. When you want to do normal calls (GM to GM), you have to unregister from the gatekeeper. You can do this by going in the Gatekeeper settings, choose "Do not register" as registering method, click on Apply. When you see in the general history that you are unregistered, you are ready to do normal calls. > My second question is that I have no access to the manual (in Help, > "sommaire" is not activated). > That's a bug of the package of your gentoo. > Many thanks in advance to take these question into account. > Notice that 1.2.0 has a bug in the openh323 part, if you load your kernel with ipv6.o being loaded, it is *possible* that you have problems registering to the gatekeeper and doing calls. The fix is to wait for 1.2.1, or to unload ipv6.o from the kernel modules. > Thierry > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be Tue Feb 22 07:53:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175893B1674 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:53:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16321-05 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:52:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from spoolo3.tiscali.be (spoolo3.tiscali.be [62.235.13.169]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A1B3B1760 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:51:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [83.134.222.80] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by spoolo3.tiscali.be with esmtp (Tiscali.be http://www.tiscali.be) id 1D3ZVU-0006oF-Tw for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:51:17 +0100 Message-ID: <421B478B.5000707@tiscali.be> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:54:03 +0000 From: Thierry Lepoint User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050221 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us References: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:53:07 -0000 Damien Sandras wrote: >Hi, > >Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 14:15 +0000, Thierry Lepoint a écrit : > > >>Hello all, >> >>I installed GnomeMeeting-1.2.0 (Gentoo) in order to take advantge of the >>new PC-to-phone system. >>I obtained a regitration and a PIN numbers from "diamondcard.us". I >>encoded them in the configuration page of Gnomemeeting. >> >> >> > >You need to get them from the GnomeMeeting window, not by direct access, >but it seems correct for you. > > That's what I did. I entered GM --> Outils --> PC-to-phone and clicked on the the link entitled 'Create a GM count to PC-to-Phone'. This led me up to https://www.diamond.uss/exec/voip-login?act=sgn&spv=gnomemeeting". So I think it's OK. > > >>How can I get a call to 32-2-5267356 (my office) in Belgium? >> >> >> > >First thing is to check that your NAT configuration is correct and that >you can do calls using GnomeMeeting and not the PC-To-Phone provider. > > If I use the "Edition --> Preferences --> Page 5/10", a click on the button so as to detect NAT led 2 times to a blocking of the GM window. So I went to "Preferences -> General --> NAT. I have: "Activer traduction IP" "Activer vérification d'IP" "adresse NAT: IP_number" Then I went to GATEKEEPER: Host: Gatekeeper ID: not given Host: gk.ast.diamondcard.us Alias: my_count_number Passwd: my_number (both were provided by diamondcard.us) >Then, you can go in the preferences, Gatekeeper Settings, Choose >"Gatekeeper Host" are registering method, click on Apply. When you see >that you are registered in the general history, you are ready to do >calls. > >Just call h323:003225267356 and it will work. > > However I cannot get in touch with somebody: the answer is "Utilisateur non trouvé" >When you want to do normal calls (GM to GM), you have to unregister from >the gatekeeper. You can do this by going in the Gatekeeper settings, >choose "Do not register" as registering method, click on Apply. When you >see in the general history that you are unregistered, you are ready to >do normal calls. > > > OK, many thanks to draw my attention on this. >>My second question is that I have no access to the manual (in Help, >>"sommaire" is not activated). >> >> >> > >That's a bug of the package of your gentoo. > > > I am going to chekc bugzilla. >>Many thanks in advance to take these question into account. >> >> >> > >Notice that 1.2.0 has a bug in the openh323 part, if you load your >kernel with ipv6.o being loaded, it is *possible* that you have problems >registering to the gatekeeper and doing calls. The fix is to wait for >1.2.1, or to unload ipv6.o from the kernel modules. > > For the moment I am still in ipv4. No support enabled in the kernel for ipv6. Thanks for your help. > > >>Thierry >> >> >> -- web site : http://www.first30.org H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/thierry.lepoint@tiscali.be From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 22 08:06:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5665B3B0E26 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:06:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17929-02 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:06:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DFE3B1758 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:04:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DCF1B2DA for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:09:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] calling via diamondcard.us From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <421B478B.5000707@tiscali.be> References: <421B3E8E.1090106@tiscali.be> <1109074928.4168.29.camel@golgoth01> <421B478B.5000707@tiscali.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:04:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1109077460.4168.36.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:06:25 -0000 Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 14:54 +0000, Thierry Lepoint a écrit : > > > If I use the "Edition --> Preferences --> Page 5/10", a click on the > button so as to detect NAT led 2 times to a blocking of the GM window. Because you clicked several times on the button (known bug). Just click once, and wait, be patient, and you will get the result. > So I went to "Preferences -> General --> NAT. > I have: "Activer traduction IP" > "Activer vérification d'IP" > "adresse NAT: IP_number" And have you forwarded the required ports (if any) ? > Then I went to GATEKEEPER: > Host: Gatekeeper > ID: not given > Host: gk.ast.diamondcard.us > Alias: my_count_number > Passwd: my_number (both were provided by diamondcard.us) > Correct > However I cannot get in touch with somebody: the answer is "Utilisateur > non trouvé" > Does it register correctly with the GK? Are you sure of your NAT setup? That's the first thing to check (unfortunately) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Tue Feb 22 15:15:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD2D3B0752; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11885-10; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6503B06C5; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (30-89.242.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.242.89.30]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E241B227; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:20:24 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Sandras To: gnomemeeting-devel-list@gnome.org, gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:15:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1109103335.3441.11.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Newsforge article about GnomeMeeting X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:37 -0000 Hi all, there is a newsforge article about GnomeMeeting here : http://software.newsforge.com/software/05/02/17/1914207.shtml?tid=130&tid=150 -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Tue Feb 22 16:11:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB9B3B06A1 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14638-04 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170E93B0691 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3hJF-0002Zk-WB for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:11 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3hJC-0003hn-9p for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:06 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:06 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9" Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:11:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:11:15 -0000 --=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everybody, for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) -K.- -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Von: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo An: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Betreff: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source) Datum: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:47:10 -0500 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:48:46 +0100 Source: gnomemeeting Binary: gnomemeeting Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo Description:=20 gnomemeeting - The GnomeMeeting Voice Over IP Suite Closes: 272898 281215 282789 284437 284740 287234 Changes:=20 gnomemeeting (1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1) unstable; urgency=3Dlow . * New upstream release. Building against Mimas pwlib/openh323 release. + Release targeted to Sid. + Don't show useless dialog. (Closes: #284740) + GM is finished when GNOME session is closed. (Closes: #284437) * debian/control: build-depend on current pwlib/openh323 versions (Closes: #282789, #287234) . gnomemeeting (1.2.0-2) experimental; urgency=3Dlow . * Recompiled with new lipt-1.8.3 package. . gnomemeeting (1.2.0-1) experimental; urgency=3Dlow . * New upstream version. + Fixes problems with Logitec Quickcam (Closes: #281215) * Compiled using Atlas release of pwlib/openh323. * Merging changes made in versions 1.0.2-6 and -7. * Build-Depend on libhowl-dev, for enabling zeroconf support. * debian/watch: updated. * debian/patches: + 05_configure: deleted. Not needed anymore. + 10_relibtoolize: disabled. Upstream runs a up-to-date Sid system. + 99_update_libtool_files: deleted. No longer needed. . gnomemeeting (1.1.3cvs20040929-1) experimental; urgency=3Dlow . * CVS Snapshot. Date: 09-30-2004 + Preparation for 1.2 release + Do not use gconf any longer for storing server list (Closes: #272898) * debian/control: + Depends on new Pandora pwlib/openh323 release. + Added Build-Dependency on evolution-data-server-dev * debian/rules: + Using $(confflags) properly. * debian/patches: + 05_configure: updated to reflect pwlib/openh323 versions we're compiling with. + 10_relibtoolize: disabled, as autogen.sh for this sources has been = run in a Debian environment. Files:=20 c8abe497aeeb90c7d09da2e2a6ed65a9 1797 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.= 2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc 248269910f59870fe188f7c1cae380ab 5518867 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0= +1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz 1ce91266a31635f507a005a549da864c 9185 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.= 2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz a1586a014a75e63defef83f9facf1839 3255460 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0= +1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCGljUS+BYJZB4jhERAkiIAKC28JvP354yPys5PqIKwtx496UM6QCfeyCt QmDHPuQ+RZgj1jaXuPTh8Vg=3D =3DzvFz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.de= b gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.= gz --=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCG5/qvdkzt4X+wX8RAnTHAJ4uc8WaCO75h6aSoXRDr7qY86ECPACfa1ur DSrdw5oodLl3LV+uT+9O5T0= =dYEu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TPu9mU+O1P99nlDi93v9-- From wouter-gnomemeeting@fort-knox.rave.org Tue Feb 22 19:29:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4523B0822 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:29:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25099-05 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:29:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from amsfep15-int.chello.nl (amsfep15-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.28]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05583B06D7 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:29:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from hibernate.cryolabs.net ([195.162.216.242]) by amsfep15-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with SMTP id <20050223002923.DUYE12698.amsfep15-int.chello.nl@hibernate.cryolabs.net> for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:29:23 +0100 Received: (qmail 20417 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 21:28:40 +0100 Received: from senta.theria.org (192.168.196.7) by hibernate.cryolabs.net with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 21:28:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:29:23 +0100 (CET) From: Wouter Van Hemel To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] In-Reply-To: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> Message-ID: References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:29:47 -0000 On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi everybody, > > for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 > tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting > 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) > Thanks! What does that STUN support through stun.voxgratia.org do exactly? From kk@verfaction.de Tue Feb 22 20:15:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0E83B0D8C for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27318-05 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293CE3B0D8B for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:15:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3l7z-0002XL-0Z for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:47 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3l7w-0007su-Sb for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:45 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:44 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:15:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1109121344.9615.5.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:15:51 -0000 --=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Wouter, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 01:29 +0100 schrieb Wouter Van Hemel: > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Kilian Krause wrote: >=20 > > Hi everybody, > > > > for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 > > tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting > > 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) > > >=20 > Thanks! What does that STUN support through stun.voxgratia.org do exactly= ? STUN is Simple Traversal of UDP over NAT. That will tell your internal workstation what external IP it shall send its UDP traffic as. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCG9lAvdkzt4X+wX8RAt2DAJ9FLTvNOXoSKTK6KSHK5vUSd13rDACdFMDf 7tAARBQnp2aK0SEirh5MlHk= =85tK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7L1DhiTksdK9ZEKZL4U6-- From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Wed Feb 23 03:03:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7135F3B1991 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:03:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13568-07 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3263B077F for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from j3b79.j.pppool.de ([85.74.59.121] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3rUZ-0005rq-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:32 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3rUq-0002Fb-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:48 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502230903.45676.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:03:35 -0000 Kilian, thanks for providing the package. I am going to try it tomorrow. I just noticed that http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnomemeeting.html shows experimental packages 1.2.0. I guess these may be removed. Thanks, Rainer Am Dienstag, 22. Februar 2005 22:11 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi everybody, > > for all those poor ipv6 users out there who had problem with the H245 > tunneling and/or gatekeeper settings. The prerelease of GnomeMeeting > 1.2.1 is now in Debian SID (a.k.a. unstable). Enjoy! ;) > > -K.- > > -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- > Von: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > An: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org > Betreff: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source) > Datum: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:47:10 -0500 > Format: 1.7 > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:48:46 +0100 > Source: gnomemeeting > Binary: gnomemeeting > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > Description: > gnomemeeting - The GnomeMeeting Voice Over IP Suite > Closes: 272898 281215 282789 284437 284740 287234 > Changes: > gnomemeeting (1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1) unstable; urgency=low > . > * New upstream release. Building against Mimas pwlib/openh323 release. > + Release targeted to Sid. > + Don't show useless dialog. (Closes: #284740) > + GM is finished when GNOME session is closed. (Closes: #284437) > * debian/control: build-depend on current pwlib/openh323 versions > (Closes: #282789, #287234) > . > gnomemeeting (1.2.0-2) experimental; urgency=low > . > * Recompiled with new lipt-1.8.3 package. > . > gnomemeeting (1.2.0-1) experimental; urgency=low > . > * New upstream version. > + Fixes problems with Logitec Quickcam (Closes: #281215) > * Compiled using Atlas release of pwlib/openh323. > * Merging changes made in versions 1.0.2-6 and -7. > * Build-Depend on libhowl-dev, for enabling zeroconf support. > * debian/watch: updated. > * debian/patches: > + 05_configure: deleted. Not needed anymore. > + 10_relibtoolize: disabled. Upstream runs a up-to-date Sid system. > + 99_update_libtool_files: deleted. No longer needed. > . > gnomemeeting (1.1.3cvs20040929-1) experimental; urgency=low > . > * CVS Snapshot. Date: 09-30-2004 > + Preparation for 1.2 release > + Do not use gconf any longer for storing server list > (Closes: #272898) > * debian/control: > + Depends on new Pandora pwlib/openh323 release. > + Added Build-Dependency on evolution-data-server-dev > * debian/rules: > + Using $(confflags) properly. > * debian/patches: > + 05_configure: updated to reflect pwlib/openh323 versions we're > compiling with. > + 10_relibtoolize: disabled, as autogen.sh for this sources has been > run in a Debian environment. > Files: > c8abe497aeeb90c7d09da2e2a6ed65a9 1797 gnome optional > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc 248269910f59870fe188f7c1cae380ab > 5518867 gnome optional gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz > 1ce91266a31635f507a005a549da864c 9185 gnome optional > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz > a1586a014a75e63defef83f9facf1839 3255460 gnome optional > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb > > > > Accepted: > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz > to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.diff.gz > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc > to pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1.dsc > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb > to > pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1_i386.deb > gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz > to > pool/main/g/gnomemeeting/gnomemeeting_1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220.orig.tar.gz -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 23 05:54:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF673B1A25 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:54:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23711-02 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:54:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582453B1A19 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:54:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3u9k-0005NR-PG for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:12 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3u9i-0002ej-Ai for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:10 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:10 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502230903.45676.rdorsch@web.de> References: <1109106666.9615.1.camel@ganymede> <200502230903.45676.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:54:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1109156050.5374.1.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] [Fwd: Accepted gnomemeeting 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 (i386 source)] X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:54:17 -0000 --=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rainer, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > Kilian, >=20 > thanks for providing the package. I am going to try it tomorrow. >=20 > I just noticed that >=20 > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnomemeeting.html >=20 > shows experimental packages 1.2.0. I guess these may be removed. Yes. The experimental version is automatically superseded and thus removed from the archive when a newer version is in unstable. As you can see at http://ftp-master.debian.org/rene-daily.txt that's queued to the ftpmaster's manual removal. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHGDQvdkzt4X+wX8RAtSnAJ9gTx5gFMN5nxUPUqQhRBFzo77q0ACfQU3G tu6Uwx0RaP2dJ42TVvTOTQI= =XOkr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KFs6sLbK+SR1fMRTyNGo-- From asharma@samyak.com Wed Feb 23 07:08:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47A73B181D for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:08:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28008-05 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:08:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFC23B18A0 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:08:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:39:12 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005022317391212369 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:39:12 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1109160511.3983.36.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:38:31 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2005 12:09:12.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[7CC3B6B0:01C519A0] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem launching GM 1.2.0 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:08:37 -0000 hi, I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. ============================================ Packages:- pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 glib-2.6.2 pango-1.8.0 atk-1.9.0 gtk+-2.6.2 evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 howl-0.9.7-1 gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz And the devel packages also. System:- FEDORA CORE 1 ============================================ Error:- [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): should not be reached aborting... And a dialog box appears which says:- <<<< "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". <<<< Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- <<<<<<<< [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND ................ root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 gnomemeeting root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet .......... <<<<<<<<<< ============================================ My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to the latest GTK version. Please help me in this context. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. From Peter.K.Martin@t-online.de Wed Feb 23 11:53:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EA73B1080 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12397-09 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89223B1084 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd35.aul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D3zlF-0001mq-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:53:17 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.76] (JJJpZgZ1reXYdqfDCu-VTGXCkN6nDceKuHiubR1HFnsYSNfwNBL7cf@[217.244.210.57]) by fwd35.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D3zlD-0Nwd3A0; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:53:15 +0100 From: "Peter K. Martin" To: Damien Sandras User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502141756.26385.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <200502142021.35795.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:53:05 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> X-ID: JJJpZgZ1reXYdqfDCu-VTGXCkN6nDceKuHiubR1HFnsYSNfwNBL7cf X-TOI-MSGID: 7c90e413-5720-492e-9354-c6cab3d1ea13 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Register as Gnomemeeting-User X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:53:21 -0000 --nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie: > Mmmh well, I can not cut and paste the manual here. Basically, you have > to go in preferences, Directory Settings, check that enable registering > is checked. Hi Damien, the first time I followed your advices, I got the content of ILS adressbook= =2E=20 But now I am not able to reach it a second time, although I enabled at=20 Directory Settings registering. One question - I beg your pardon - what is a NAT gateway and what is to be = =20 configured by me? Peter =2D-=20 --nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHLTxhlrz1G3ipzQRAuoXAKCP58vHQjyn63XX6gPYVEdbYQ15iwCfUmFj hg65sueO/KvRciKbwlsPS4E= =1TVD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7071018.hDEE7GRKNg-- From dsandras@seconix.com Wed Feb 23 15:57:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DC53B0F23 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25751-01 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201433B15B0 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (121.223-201-80.adsl.skynet.be [80.201.223.121]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420BE116EB; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:52 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Sandras To: "Peter K. Martin" In-Reply-To: <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> References: <200502141756.26385.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <200502142021.35795.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:57:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1109192272.3289.1.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Register as Gnomemeeting-User X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:57:55 -0000 Le mercredi 23 février 2005 à 17:53 +0100, Peter K. Martin a écrit : > Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie: > > Mmmh well, I can not cut and paste the manual here. Basically, you have > > to go in preferences, Directory Settings, check that enable registering > > is checked. > > Hi Damien, > the first time I followed your advices, I got the content of ILS adressbook. > But now I am not able to reach it a second time, although I enabled at > Directory Settings registering. > No idea about this one, if the IP address doesn't change, I don't understand why it doesn't register you, nobody ever reported that. Perhaps you are using special chars in the comment/location/email/firstname/lastname? > One question - I beg your pardon - what is a NAT gateway and what is to be > configured by me? A NAT gateway is when you have a computer or a router sharing your connection for several other computers. You have to configure it accordingly to the FAQ. > > Peter > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Wed Feb 23 16:02:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE04C3B1811 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:02:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26012-07 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:02:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B29A3B0C60 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:02:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D43el-0008Cp-Jm; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:52 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D43ej-0005xS-Ku; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:49 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:49 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109192272.3289.1.camel@golgoth01> References: <200502141756.26385.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <200502142021.35795.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1108409131.3179.20.camel@golgoth01> <200502231753.06047.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> <1109192272.3289.1.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:02:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1109192569.28536.35.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Register as Gnomemeeting-User X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: "Peter K. Martin" X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:02:57 -0000 --=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 21:57 +0100 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Le mercredi 23 f=E9vrier 2005 =E0 17:53 +0100, Peter K. Martin a =E9crit = : > > Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie: > > > Mmmh well, I can not cut and paste the manual here. Basically, you ha= ve > > > to go in preferences, Directory Settings, check that enable registeri= ng > > > is checked. > >=20 > > Hi Damien, > > the first time I followed your advices, I got the content of ILS adress= book.=20 > > But now I am not able to reach it a second time, although I enabled at=20 > > Directory Settings registering. > >=20 >=20 > No idea about this one, if the IP address doesn't change, I don't > understand why it doesn't register you, nobody ever reported that. >=20 > Perhaps you are using special chars in the > comment/location/email/firstname/lastname? ...actually there's an almost ancient report about '+' not permitted for email addresses. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHO95vdkzt4X+wX8RAsLYAJ9rMiL/Y+ND9o4V0zCl7EUc7lQ5zgCcCDfr /tXSIBvnNrMzh0HACub2R2s= =aZPm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vbb+HrtgkVjScwAlTJMA-- From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Thu Feb 24 15:13:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7792A3B11EB for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:13:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32706-04 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:13:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BFD3B11F4 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:13:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0e54.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.84] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4PMe-0002E0-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:13:36 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4PMy-0003wf-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:13:56 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:13:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:13:41 -0000 Hi Kilian, I installed the new gnomemeeting version 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 from sid. I setup call forwarding rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar ding/forward_host 118.145.140.124 rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar ding/always_forward true rdorsch@paddy:~$ and a gateway is in use: rdorsch@paddy:~$ cat .gconf/apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/gateway/%gconf.xml 118.152.191.172 rdorsch@paddy:~$ Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more promising. It contains: 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may laptop (118.145.140.124). Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? Here is the full debug output of an incoming call: 2005/02/24 21:07:12.464 3:05:57.017 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:2064, if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Started incoming call thread 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Awaiting first PDU 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Receiving PDU: setup 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 RFC2833 Handler created 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Handling PDU: Setup callRef=155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/24 21:07:12.486 3:05:57.039 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 21:07:12.487 3:05:57.040 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.065 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 reason=EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 set to EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.067 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending release complete PDU: callRef=155 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Sending PDU: releaseComplete 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Application not accepting calls 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 reason=EndedByTransportFail 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.070 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Signal channel stopped on first PDU. 2005/02/24 21:07:12.517 3:05:57.070 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 closing: connectionState=NoConnectionActive 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::Close 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:88270c0 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 terminated. 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.117 H323 Cleaner H323 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 deleted. 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.118 H323 Cleaner H323 Cleaning up connections Thanks, Rainer Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > Hi Rainer, > > > Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem > > comes up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make > > sense for you? > > as long as IPv4 notation-compatibility notation in IPv6 is used, there > will be problems. Thus if your forwarding is to an ipv4 host, yes. > > > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > > > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). > > > > I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest > > version is 1.12.2 > > > > On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 > > > > What version I should watch out for? > > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > days to get the autobuilder script back online. -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 24 15:27:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED6B3B1C1D for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:27:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01006-06 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:27:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585F33B1C09 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:27:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (44-237.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.237.44]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FC21B66A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:32:50 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502122000.08913.rdorsch@web.de> <1108261668.7324.47.camel@ganymede> <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:27:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:27:46 -0000 Hi Rainer, Le jeudi 24 février 2005 à 21:13 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hi Kilian, > > I installed the new gnomemeeting version 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-1 from sid. > > I setup call forwarding > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar > ding/forward_host > 118.145.140.124 > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwar > ding/always_forward > true > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > and a gateway is in use: > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > cat .gconf/apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/gateway/%gconf.xml > > > > > > 118.152.191.172 > > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > promising. It contains: > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party > name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it received > via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may laptop > (118.145.140.124). > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, including those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then disable the gateway setting when you forward calls. The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and calling h323:5001 is just the same. > Here is the full debug output of an incoming call: > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.464 3:05:57.017 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP > Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:2064, > if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Started incoming call thread > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.465 3:05:57.018 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Awaiting first PDU > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Receiving PDU: setup > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.472 3:05:57.025 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.473 3:05:57.026 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.474 3:05:57.027 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.475 3:05:57.028 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: H.261-QCIF <10> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: H.261-CIF <11> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.476 3:05:57.029 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/basicString <13> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.477 3:05:57.030 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Added > capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.478 3:05:57.031 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.479 3:05:57.032 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.033 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.480 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: H.261-QCIF <10> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: H.261-CIF <11> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.481 3:05:57.034 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/basicString <13> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.035 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.482 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Found > capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 RFC2833 > Handler created > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.483 3:05:57.036 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Handling PDU: Setup callRef=155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.484 3:05:57.037 H225 Answer:88270c0 H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set > remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.485 3:05:57.038 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Set > protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.486 3:05:57.039 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.487 3:05:57.040 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Party > name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.065 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.512 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 > reason=EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.066 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 Call > end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 set to EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.513 3:05:57.067 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending release complete PDU: callRef=155 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Sending PDU: releaseComplete > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.515 3:05:57.068 H323 Cleaner H323 > Cleaning up connections > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 > Application not accepting calls > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.069 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 > reason=EndedByTransportFail > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.516 3:05:57.070 H225 Answer:88270c0 H225 Signal > channel stopped on first PDU. > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.517 3:05:57.070 H323 Cleaner H323 > Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 closing: > connectionState=NoConnectionActive > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.518 3:05:57.071 H323 Cleaner H323 > H323Transport::Close > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 > H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:88270c0 > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.519 3:05:57.072 H323 Cleaner H323 > Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 terminated. > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.117 H323 Cleaner H323 > Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2064/155 deleted. > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.564 3:05:57.118 H323 Cleaner H323 > Cleaning up connections > > Thanks, > Rainer > > Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2005 03:27 schrieb Kilian Krause: > > Hi Rainer, > > > > > Hmm...but being called over IPv6 is not a problem at all. The problem > > > comes up, when I am trying to forward these calls. Does that still make > > > sense for you? > > > > as long as IPv4 notation-compatibility notation in IPv6 is used, there > > will be problems. Thus if your forwarding is to an ipv4 host, yes. > > > > > > The GnomeMeeting 1.2.1 with fixed OpenH323 will be ready for GNOME 2.10 > > > > so this should happen rather soon (before end of Feb). > > > > > > I am confused about the openh323. On www.openh323.org I find the latest > > > version is 1.12.2 > > > > > > On the Debian server I see versions 1.13.2, 1.14.2, and 1.15.2 > > > > > > What version I should watch out for? > > > > For now it's tagged pwlib 1.8.4 and openh323 1.15.3. Yet that IPv6 bug > > isn't fixed so far and still needs to be adressed. If you seriously need > > this to work or would like to test the cutting edge GnomeMeeting CVS, i > > can hand you cvs snapshot debs. Maybe i'll also find some time these > > days to get the autobuilder script back online. > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Thu Feb 24 16:31:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFC23B1C85 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:31:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05373-01 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:31:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7B53B1286 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:31:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0e54.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.84] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4QaQ-0002N6-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:31:54 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4Qak-0004ZV-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:32:14 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:32:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:31:56 -0000 Hi Damien, Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 21:27 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > > promising. It contains: > > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > > Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it > > received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may > > laptop (118.145.140.124). > > > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go > through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, including > those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then disable the > gateway setting when you forward calls. > > The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing > h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and > calling h323:5001 is just the same. > Ok, that sounds good. Switching forwarding off, does not work either. Maybe I did configure the forward host incorrectly: rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host 118.145.140.124 rdorsch@paddy:~$ What I get is 2005/02/24 22:21:19.299 4:20:03.852 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 22:21:19.300 4:20:03.853 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 22:21:19.308 4:20:03.861 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 reason=EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 set to EndedByNoAccept When I do 5001@118.145.140.124, I get 005/02/24 22:19:07.707 4:17:52.260 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/24 22:19:07.709 4:17:52.262 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 22:19:07.710 4:17:52.263 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 22:19:07.906 4:17:52.459 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 Party name "h323:5001@118.145.140.124" mapped to "5001@ip$118.145.140.124:1720 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2655/157 reason=EndedByNoAccept Nothing arrives at the debug output of the gnomemeeting running on the laptop. Do I need to setup a gatekeeper or can I forward directly to the gnomemeeting on the laptop? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Thu Feb 24 17:12:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830493B116A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:12:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07905-07 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:12:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040FB3B1BD4 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:12:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 44-237.244.81.adsl.skynet.be (44-237.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.237.44]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4091B66A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:17:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242113.56232.rdorsch@web.de> <1109276860.3582.9.camel@golgoth01> <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:12:29 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:12:32 -0000 Le jeu 24/02/2005 à 22:32, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > Hi Damien, > > Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 21:27 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > > > promising. It contains: > > > > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > > > Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > > > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > > > > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it > > > received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead of may > > > laptop (118.145.140.124). > > > > > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > > > > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go > > through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, including > > those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then disable the > > gateway setting when you forward calls. > > > > The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing > > h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and > > calling h323:5001 is just the same. > > > > Ok, that sounds good. Switching forwarding off, does not work either. Maybe I > did configure the forward host incorrectly: > I guess you mean switching "use gateway" off? > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > 118.145.140.124 > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > What I get is > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.299 4:20:03.852 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.300 4:20:03.853 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.308 4:20:03.861 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 reason=EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 Call > end reason for ip$[::ffff:9.152.191.172]:2675/159 set to EndedByNoAccept > I need the start of the debug output. > > When I do 5001@118.145.140.124, I get > > 005/02/24 22:19:07.707 4:17:52.260 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set > remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Set > protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.709 4:17:52.262 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.710 4:17:52.263 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.906 4:17:52.459 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 Party > name "h323:5001@118.145.140.124" mapped to "5001@ip$118.145.140.124:1720 > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2655/157 > reason=EndedByNoAccept > > Nothing arrives at the debug output of the gnomemeeting running on the laptop. > > Do I need to setup a gatekeeper or can I forward directly to the gnomemeeting > on the laptop? > Why are you calling 5001? It was just an example. Is there something connected to 5001? Sorry but I'm a bit puzzled by your tests, what you are trying to achieve and what works and what doesn't. Things seem however simple. You have 2 cases. Imagine that you have machine A and B, and gateway C. If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B through C then you simply put B as forward host, C as gateway, and enable "use gateway", or you use no gateway and use h323:B@C as forward URL, you will do this on A. If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without using C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will do this on A. > Thanks, > Rainer -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Thu Feb 24 17:39:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDC53B12B3 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:39:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09523-08 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:39:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE073B1AE6 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0e54.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.84] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4RdM-0002Uy-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:39:00 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4Rdg-00052U-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:39:20 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:39:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> In-Reply-To: <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:39:04 -0000 Hi Damien, sorry for puzzling you ;-) Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 23:12 schrieb Damien Sandras: > Le jeu 24/02/2005 =E0 22:32, Rainer Dorsch a =E9crit : > > Hi Damien, > > > > Am Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 21:27 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > > > Call forwarding is still not working but the debug output looks more > > > > promising. It contains: > > > > > > > > 2005/02/24 21:07:12.510 3:05:57.063 H225 Answer:88270c0 H323 > > > > Party name "h323:118.145.140.124@118.152.191.172" mapped to > > > > "118.145.140.124@ip$118.152.191.172:1720 > > > > > > > > which looks like gnomemeeting is trying to forward the call which it > > > > received via the gateway to the gateway (118.152.191.172), instead = of > > > > may laptop (118.145.140.124). > > > > > > > > Is that a bug or did I setup it incorrectly? > > > > > > That's not a bug but a feature. You have configured GnomeMeeting to go > > > through a gateway, so all calls are going through the gateway, > > > including those that are forwarded. If you do not want taht, then > > > disable the gateway setting when you forward calls. > > > > > > The gateway is just a way not to have to type it in the url. So doing > > > h323:5001@gateway_ip or configuring the gateway to gateway_ip and > > > calling h323:5001 is just the same. > > > > Ok, that sounds good. Switching forwarding off, does not work either. > > Maybe I did configure the forward host incorrectly: > > I guess you mean switching "use gateway" off? Correct. > > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ gconftool-2 > > --get /apps/gnomemeeting/protocols/h323/call_forwarding/forward_host > > 118.145.140.124 > > rdorsch@paddy:~$ > > > > What I get is > > > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.299 4:20:03.852 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > > Sending call proceeding PDU > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.300 4:20:03.853 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > > Sending PDU: callProceeding > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.308 4:20:03.861 H225 Answer:8886c48 H225 > > Sending PDU: facility > > 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H225 Answer:8886c48 H323 > > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2675/159 > > reason=3DEndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 22:21:19.310 4:20:03.863 H2= 25 > > Answer:8886c48 H323 Call end reason for > > ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2675/159 set to EndedByNoAccept > > I need the start of the debug output. Appended. > > > When I do 5001@118.145.140.124, I get > > > > 005/02/24 22:19:07.707 4:17:52.260 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=3DIdle > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H245 > > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=3DIdle > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 = =20 > > Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.708 4:17:52.261 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 = =20 > > Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.709 4:17:52.262 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > > Sending call proceeding PDU > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.710 4:17:52.263 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 > > Sending PDU: callProceeding > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.906 4:17:52.459 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 = =20 > > Party name "h323:5001@118.145.140.124" mapped to > > "5001@ip$118.145.140.124:1720 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 = =20 > > H225 Answer:87d2f40 H225 Sending PDU: facility > > 2005/02/24 22:19:07.908 4:17:52.461 H225 Answer:87d2f40 H323 > > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:2655/157 > > reason=3DEndedByNoAccept > > > > Nothing arrives at the debug output of the gnomemeeting running on the > > laptop. > > > > Do I need to setup a gatekeeper or can I forward directly to the > > gnomemeeting on the laptop? > > Why are you calling 5001? It was just an example. Is there something > connected to 5001? That was just to understand if gnomemeeting needs an forward target of the= =20 form xxx@yyy. I expected that 5001 was an example, but I would have hoped=20 that I get an rejection from the A (your nomenclature below) > > Sorry but I'm a bit puzzled by your tests, what you are trying to > achieve and what works and what doesn't. I am a VOIP beginner...so not all things I try might make sense. > > Things seem however simple. > > You have 2 cases. Imagine that you have machine A and B, and gateway C. > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B through C > then you simply put B as forward host, C as gateway, and enable "use > gateway", or you use no gateway and use h323:B@C as forward URL, you > will do this on A. That is not what I want to do. > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without using > C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will do > this on A. > That is what I want to achieve. The log (I am surprised that there is no indication at all about the=20 forward_host 118.145.140.124): 2005/02/24 23:27:35.760 5:26:20.313 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP=20 Started connection: host=3D::ffff:118.152.191.172:3201,=20 if=3D118.152.251.114:1720, handle=3D45 2005/02/24 23:27:35.761 5:26:20.314 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Started incoming call thread 2005/02/24 23:27:35.761 5:26:20.314 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Awaiting first PDU 2005/02/24 23:27:35.767 5:26:20.320 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Receiving PDU: setup 2005/02/24 23:27:35.767 5:26:20.320 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Incoming call, first PDU: callReference=3D164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.767 5:26:20.320 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.768 5:26:20.321 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.768 5:26:20.322 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.769 5:26:20.322 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.769 5:26:20.322 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.769 5:26:20.323 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.770 5:26:20.323 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.771 5:26:20.324 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.771 5:26:20.324 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.772 5:26:20.325 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.772 5:26:20.325 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.772 5:26:20.325 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.773 5:26:20.326 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.773 5:26:20.326 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.773 5:26:20.327 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Add= ed=20 capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.774 5:26:20.327 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: iLBC-13k3{sw} <1> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.775 5:26:20.328 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: MS-GSM{sw} <2> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.776 5:26:20.329 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-15k{sw} <3> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.777 5:26:20.330 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: iLBC-15k2{sw} <4> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.777 5:26:20.330 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: GSM-06.10{sw} <5> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.777 5:26:20.331 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: SpeexNarrow-8k{sw} <6> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.778 5:26:20.331 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: G.726-32k{sw} <7> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.778 5:26:20.331 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: G.711-uLaw-64k <8> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.779 5:26:20.332 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: G.711-ALaw-64k <9> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.780 5:26:20.333 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: H.261-QCIF <10> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.780 5:26:20.334 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: H.261-CIF <11> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.781 5:26:20.334 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/hookflash <12> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.781 5:26:20.334 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/basicString <13> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.782 5:26:20.335 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/dtmf <14> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.782 5:26:20.335 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Fou= nd=20 capability: UserInput/RFC2833 <15> 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 RFC2833=20 Handler created 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 =20 Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Handling PDU: Setup callRef=3D164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.784 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 =20 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 =20 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set= =20 remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set= =20 protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 2005/02/24 23:27:35.786 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending call proceeding PDU 2005/02/24 23:27:35.788 5:26:20.341 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending PDU: callProceeding 2005/02/24 23:27:35.798 5:26:20.351 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending PDU: facility 2005/02/24 23:27:35.799 5:26:20.352 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 =20 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164=20 reason=3DEndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Cal= l=20 end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 set to EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending release complete PDU: callRef=3D164 2005/02/24 23:27:35.802 5:26:20.355 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Sending PDU: releaseComplete 2005/02/24 23:27:35.803 5:26:20.356 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Cleaning up connections 2005/02/24 23:27:35.805 5:26:20.358 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 closing:=20 connectionState=3DNoConnectionActive 2005/02/24 23:27:35.806 5:26:20.359 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 =20 Application not accepting calls 2005/02/24 23:27:35.806 5:26:20.359 H323 Cleaner H245 =20 Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.807 5:26:20.360 H323 Cleaner H245 =20 Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=3DIdle 2005/02/24 23:27:35.808 5:26:20.361 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 H323Transport::Close 2005/02/24 23:27:35.808 5:26:20.362 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 =20 Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164=20 reason=3DEndedByTransportFail 2005/02/24 23:27:35.809 5:26:20.362 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 H323Transport::CleanUpOnTermination for H225 Answer:88f15a8 2005/02/24 23:27:35.810 5:26:20.363 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Sig= nal=20 channel stopped on first PDU. 2005/02/24 23:27:35.820 5:26:20.373 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 terminated. 2005/02/24 23:27:35.868 5:26:20.421 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 deleted. 2005/02/24 23:27:35.868 5:26:20.421 H323 Cleaner H323 =20 Cleaning up connections Thanks, Rainer =2D-=20 Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 04:27:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCB23B0B64 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:27:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09793-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:27:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967083B1D6D for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:27:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336311B2B5 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:32:45 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242232.13830.rdorsch@web.de> <1109283148.2246.6.camel@linuxzone> <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:27:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:27:36 -0000 hi :) > > > > Sorry but I'm a bit puzzled by your tests, what you are trying to > > achieve and what works and what doesn't. > > I am a VOIP beginner...so not all things I try might make sense. > No worries, the setup is not complex. But I'm lost in the explanations. > > > > Things seem however simple. > > > > You have 2 cases. Imagine that you have machine A and B, and gateway C. > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B through C > > then you simply put B as forward host, C as gateway, and enable "use > > gateway", or you use no gateway and use h323:B@C as forward URL, you > > will do this on A. > > That is not what I want to do. > > > > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without using > > C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will do > > this on A. > > > > That is what I want to achieve. > OK, in that case, what you have to do is : - do not use a gateway - put the IP of the destination of the call forward in the call forwarding box (h323:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) - enable call forwarding > The log (I am surprised that there is no indication at all about the > forward_host 118.145.140.124): > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.760 5:26:20.313 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP > Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:3201, > if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 118.152.251.114 is the local address of the GM that is forwarding the call it just received. > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Handling PDU: Setup callRef=164 > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.784 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set > remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 Set > protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.786 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Sending call proceeding PDU > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.788 5:26:20.341 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Sending PDU: callProceeding > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.798 5:26:20.351 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > Sending PDU: facility > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.799 5:26:20.352 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > reason=EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 Call > end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 set to EndedByNoAccept > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 The call is not forwarded, it is rejected. Can you watch what happens in the "General History"? What happens in the GUI when you activate call forwarding, isn't there an error message? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From kk@verfaction.de Fri Feb 25 06:50:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EA73B07B1; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:50:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16959-03; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:50:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx.verfaction.de (nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5E23B1227; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:50:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from erebos.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim) by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D4dyy-00066S-8N; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:08 +0100 Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de) by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D4dyu-0008PM-AF; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:04 +0100 Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:04 +0100 From: "Kilian Krause" To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs" Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:50:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented itself as ganymde.verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting development mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:50:21 -0000 --=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everybody, guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the commonly known ones:=20 http://snapshots.seconix.com/ (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/=20 (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. Please use: "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next week. For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's *NO* guarantee with these debs. Enjoy testing. --=20 Best regards, Kilian --=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHxDsvdkzt4X+wX8RAk9EAJwMeALqrgEOVOQcjFDtGx+nvBtRKQCfRLk4 ACSWlVZwMUqBVjCiiO5WFUc= =Ix73 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-EbQ88D1sZNnuFxSa4crs-- From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 07:02:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0091B3B0968; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:02:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17634-10; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ED33B07B1; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06446147A2; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:08:02 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting development mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:02:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1109332966.3418.34.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:02:49 -0000 Hi :) Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 12:50 +0100, Kilian Krause a écrit : > Hi everybody, > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > commonly known ones: > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > Please use: > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > Thanks for this! Good job! > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > week. > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > Don't complain either if they uninstall Skype ;) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 07:57:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9104F3B0A08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:57:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20560-06 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C585D3B0817 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:57:50 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 2663 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 12:57:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 12:57:49 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:57:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:57:49 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> In-Reply-To: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:57:56 -0000 Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not finished recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the way anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? any comments ?? have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... cheers Selon Kilian Krause : > Hi everybody, > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > commonly known ones: > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > Please use: > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > week. > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > Enjoy testing. > > -- > Best regards, > Kilian > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 08:01:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35473B140E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20836-07 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5B03B1233 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE0511BC4 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:05:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:00:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1109336441.3418.38.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:01:06 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 13:57 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not finished > recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone > cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the way > anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? any > comments ?? > I think it should work, I have no sipphone.com account though. If not, we will fix it ;) > have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... > > cheers > > > Selon Kilian Krause : > > > Hi everybody, > > > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > > commonly known ones: > > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > > Please use: > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > > week. > > > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > > > Enjoy testing. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Kilian > > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 08:05:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C403B1DE1 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:05:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21561-08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:05:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ACB3B1E82 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:02:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008D4C93E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:07:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:02:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:05:25 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 13:57 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not finished > recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone > cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the way > anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? any > comments ?? > Just thinking to that, do they support some "open" codecs or only G.723.1 and G.729a? > have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... > > cheers > > > Selon Kilian Krause : > > > Hi everybody, > > > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > > commonly known ones: > > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > > Please use: > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > > week. > > > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > > > Enjoy testing. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Kilian > > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 08:42:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C89B3B13F8 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23455-02 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B593B13FC for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 3141 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 13:42:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 13:42:24 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:42:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:42:23 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:42:26 -0000 you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP devices against vonage.... A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really ....beta ..... if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) cheers Selon Damien Sandras : > Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 13:57 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > > Great Killian , I m looking forward the mdk 10.1 package , as I did not > finished > > recompiling .... I m still using xlite for my sipphone.com , even linphone > > cannot call a regular number with , I guess I missed something..... by the > way > > anyone tried to use phonegaim on anything else than Linspire and win ?? > any > > comments ?? > > > > Just thinking to that, do they support some "open" codecs or only > G.723.1 and G.729a? > > > have few other apps to try , but for sure nothing beats GM I think .... > > > > cheers > > > > > > Selon Kilian Krause : > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > guess what! The CVS snapshots service is back! Hosting mirrors are the > > > commonly known ones: > > > http://snapshots.seconix.com/ > > > (EU mirror - thanks Damien and EasyNet) > > > http://snapshots.voxgratia.org/ > > > (US mirror - thanks to Postincrement) > > > > > > I've just added back Debian SID and SARGE. SID comes as i386 and pure64. > > > Please use: > > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian sid main" for i386 > > > "deb http://snapshots.seconix.com/debian pure64 main" for amd64 > > > > > > Mandrake 10.1 and SuSE 9.2 (and maybe 9.1) will be added until next > > > week. > > > > > > For now I have only GMCVS in there, i.e. no OPAL. Don't tell me it's > > > missing i *KNOW* that! It'll be added as i find the time. > > > > > > The usual disclamer applies: these packs may eat your data, burn your PC > > > or even worse. Don't come to me complaining if things go wrong. There's > > > *NO* guarantee with these debs. > > > > > > Enjoy testing. > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Kilian > > > > > > > > -- > _ Damien Sandras > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From dsandras@seconix.com Fri Feb 25 08:56:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DC23B13F8 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:56:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24172-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:55:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B673B1E3E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:55:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE48CAC05 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:01:12 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:55:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:56:00 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 14:42 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or > maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited > free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN > .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are > the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP > devices against vonage.... > > A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > > BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really > ....beta ..... I only know kphone, linphone, phonegaim and ... GnomeMeeting. > > if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) > Not sure if FWD-out supports that. > cheers -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From brrhtz@yahoo.de Fri Feb 25 10:28:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56B93B1105 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:28:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29336-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:28:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.33]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22FE23B1082 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:28:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO caruso.quasi.local) (brrhtz@80.218.17.231 with plain) by smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 15:28:54 -0000 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Bruno Hertz To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:28:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1109345337.6073.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:28:59 -0000 On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 14:55 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > I only know kphone, linphone, phonegaim and ... GnomeMeeting. There's also SJPhone for linux, but it has it's flaws too: * no dial pad (i.e. not dtmf during calls) * some latency, depending on your soundcard (driver) Apart from that, in terms of audio quality etc. it's the best linux sip phone I've encountered so far, and besides GM the only softphone I'd currently recommend. Regards, Bruno. PS: You can run asterisk as a softphone too (chan_oss resp. chan_alsa), latency is very small, audio quality medium but functionality pretty limited. Also, the mentioned chans don't release the sound device between calls, which too limits their usefulness. From lurch@gmx.li Fri Feb 25 10:43:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B7F3B07E0 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30062-05 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0791F3B0010 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0ICH00LH14ZWJN@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:43:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:43:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1PFh7Vj008832 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:43:07 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 12492 invoked from network); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:43:07 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:43:07 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:42:57 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) In-reply-to: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:43:12 -0000 --nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 14:42 schrieb michel memeteau: > you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have > G711 or maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it= s > unlimited free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup > to call PSTN .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open > IPBX as they are the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and > they proned opening SIP devices against vonage.... > > A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > > BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really > ....beta ..... There are good reasons to use G.711: Low complexity - modern, high efficient codecs use a lot of computing power= ,=20 so if you want to do a lots of channels, you have to trade bandwith for low= =20 complexity. Especially Speex needs a lot of cpu power ... High quality - if you are providing a PSTN gateway, you want to have the be= st=20 possible narrowband codec - and G.711 is your choice then. Even the best=20 modern codecs will give a (unnoticeable) worse quality. =46ax transparency - G.711 is the only codec you can transfer Fax over=20 transparently. Low latency - if you dont care about bandwith, G.711 gives you the lowest=20 latency Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCH0eHb39KPYz+qlMRAoD9AKCcvKS7VMWYZ7q7pJtQFfuSGc7dZACghjhW dAZikhiyzHELl9z3jhA4Rrg= =3+pN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4915173.6t1AXsVdav-- From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 10:54:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29823B1099 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:53:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30899-09 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:53:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F3F3B0F41 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:53:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 5074 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 15:53:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 15:53:23 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:53:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1109346803.421f49f31b3bc@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:53:23 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> In-Reply-To: <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:54:01 -0000 Thanks for those precisions , I understand why a SIP registrar would use G711 , I did not now that we could use Fax over G711 but I understand it because it s a lassless codec ( not sure about that ) .. I gave a try to Sjphone , but it s a bit limited I guess .... Can you phone a PSTN with it ?? Another question : is this ISAC codec free as ILBC , did skype change the default codec .... I thought they were using only ILBC at first ..... Quoting Stefan Bruens : > > There are good reasons to use G.711: > Low complexity - modern, high efficient codecs use a lot of computing power, > > so if you want to do a lots of channels, you have to trade bandwith for low > complexity. Especially Speex needs a lot of cpu power ... > High quality - if you are providing a PSTN gateway, you want to have the best > > possible narrowband codec - and G.711 is your choice then. Even the best > modern codecs will give a (unnoticeable) worse quality. > Fax transparency - G.711 is the only codec you can transfer Fax over > transparently. > Low latency - if you dont care about bandwith, G.711 gives you the lowest > latency > > Greetings, > > Stefan > > -- > Stefan Brüns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen > mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ > phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From mmemeteau@marseille-wireless.org Fri Feb 25 10:59:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB273B0703 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31315-04 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from levadis.com (wpc0438.amenworld.com [62.193.225.52]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C643B141C for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:31 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 5189 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 15:59:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 15:59:30 -0000 Received: from gateway11.ornis.com (gateway11.ornis.com [194.133.14.20]) by webmail.marseille-wireless.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:59:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1109347170.421f4b622ec44@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:59:30 +0100 From: michel memeteau To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <200502251643.03967.lurch@gmx.li> <1109346803.421f49f31b3bc@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> In-Reply-To: <1109346803.421f49f31b3bc@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 194.133.14.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:59:35 -0000 OK here s what they say .... dont mention whether it s free ( as in beer ) or not GIPS iSAC GIPS iSAC - a wideband, adaptive codec, designed to deliver high quality sound in both high-bit-rate and low-bit-rate conditions. GIPS iSAC makes VoIP communications possible even using a dial-up modem, automatically adjusting transmission rates to deliver better-than-PSTN voice quality. Quoting michel memeteau : > Thanks for those precisions , I understand why a SIP registrar would use G711 > , > I did not now that we could use Fax over G711 but I understand it because it > s > a lassless codec ( not sure about that ) .. I gave a try to Sjphone , but it > s > a bit limited I guess .... Can you phone a PSTN with it ?? > > Another question : is this ISAC codec free as ILBC , did skype change the > default codec .... I thought they were using only ILBC at first ..... > > Quoting Stefan Bruens : > > > > There are good reasons to use G.711: > > Low complexity - modern, high efficient codecs use a lot of computing > power, > > > > so if you want to do a lots of channels, you have to trade bandwith for low > > > complexity. Especially Speex needs a lot of cpu power ... > > High quality - if you are providing a PSTN gateway, you want to have the > best > > > > possible narrowband codec - and G.711 is your choice then. Even the best > > modern codecs will give a (unnoticeable) worse quality. > > Fax transparency - G.711 is the only codec you can transfer Fax over > > transparently. > > Low latency - if you dont care about bandwith, G.711 gives you the lowest > > latency > > > > Greetings, > > > > Stefan > > > > -- > > Stefan Brüns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen > > mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ > > phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 > > > > > -- > Michel memeteau > 0624808051 > jabber : freechelmi > www.marseille-wireless.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > -- Michel memeteau 0624808051 jabber : freechelmi www.marseille-wireless.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From devel@tootai.net Fri Feb 25 11:00:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340843B1253 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:00:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31381-10 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:00:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mango.tootai.net (mango.tootai.net [217.11.129.94]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9FC3B1457 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.10.4] (cbk163.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.30.108.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by mango.tootai.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id j1PFxtqI006798 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:59:55 +0100 Message-ID: <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:06:04 +0100 From: daniel huhardeaux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> In-Reply-To: <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:00:26 -0000 michel memeteau a écrit : >you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or >maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited >free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN >.... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are >the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP >devices against vonage.... > >A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > >BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really >....beta ..... > > Hmmh, I find it more and more stable. If you don't want to use the linux version, run the windows one with wine, works great, specially with KDE. You also have SjPhone: simple but working. >if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) > > FWD is only g711. Try sipgate or sipphone -- Daniel Huhardeaux ______ _____ _____ ______ ______ __ enum +48 32 285 5276 /_ _// _ // _ //_ _// __ // / IAX FWD +1 7009 422493 / / / // // // / / / / /_/ // / sip:101 h323:121 @voip./_/ /____//____/ /_/ /_/ /_//_/.com From rdorsch@alzental-castle.de Fri Feb 25 15:31:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280AB3B0888 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14084-10 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from alzental-castle.de (213-146-167-85.kunde.vdserver.de [213.146.167.85]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609123B0834 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from j0364.j.pppool.de ([85.74.3.100] helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org ident=mail) by alzental-castle.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4m7m-0005GK-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:31:46 +0100 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4m88-0008KE-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:32:08 +0100 From: Rainer Dorsch Organization: Alzental Castle To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:32:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502252132.07907.rdorsch@web.de> Sender: Rainer Dorsch X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:31:53 -0000 Hi Damien, > > > If you get a call from C to A and want to forward it to B, without > > > using C, then you simply put B as forward host and that's all. You will > > > do this on A. > > > > That is what I want to achieve. > > OK, in that case, what you have to do is : > - do not use a gateway I did not use the gateway. > - put the IP of the destination of the call forward in the call > forwarding box (h323:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) I missed the h323: so far. Added it now, but still does not work. > - enable call forwarding > > > The log (I am surprised that there is no indication at all about the > > forward_host 118.145.140.124): > > > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.760 5:26:20.313 H323 Listener:83340e8 H323TCP > > Started connection: host=::ffff:118.152.191.172:3201, > > if=118.152.251.114:1720, handle=45 > > 118.152.251.114 is the local address of the GM that is forwarding the > call it just received. Correct, it should forward it to 118.145.140.124 > > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.336 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > > Created new connection: ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.783 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Handling PDU: Setup callRef=164 > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.784 5:26:20.337 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > > Stopping MasterSlaveDetermination: state=Idle > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H245 > > Stopping TerminalCapabilitySet: state=Idle > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.338 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Set remote application name: "Cisco IOS 12.x 181/18" > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.785 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Set protocol version to 2 and implying H.245 version 3 > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.786 5:26:20.339 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Sending call proceeding PDU > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.788 5:26:20.341 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Sending PDU: callProceeding > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.798 5:26:20.351 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > Sending PDU: facility > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.799 5:26:20.352 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > > Clearing connection ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 > > reason=EndedByNoAccept > > 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 Answer:88f15a8 H323 > > Call end reason for ip$[::ffff:118.152.191.172]:3201/164 set to > > EndedByNoAccept 2005/02/24 23:27:35.800 5:26:20.353 H225 > > Answer:88f15a8 H225 > > The call is not forwarded, it is rejected. Can you watch what happens in > the "General History"? Is that dumped into a file? I am enabling the forwarding with gconftool-2 via a shell console. > > What happens in the GUI when you activate call forwarding, isn't there > an error message? I did not watch the GUI while enabling since I did that from remote. I did not see a popup error box, when I returned to the workstation, running the gnomemeeting forwarding the call. When starting up gnomemeeting 1.2.1 I sometimes see [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 This is with forwarding disabled and happens only sometimes. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Alzentalstr. 28 D-71083 Herrenberg 07032-919495 Icq: 32550367 From carlosh@linuxservices.co.nz Fri Feb 25 17:40:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1D53B0C42 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19795-08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from linda-1.paradise.net.nz (bm-1a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A1A3B0BED for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (smtp-2a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.195]) by linda-1.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0ICH0082ROBZN7@linda-1.paradise.net.nz> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:40:47 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.0.18] (203-96-159-89.paradise.net.nz [203.96.159.89]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ACA9E2B6 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:40:47 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:39:27 +1300 From: Carlos Hernandez Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) In-reply-to: <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <421FA91F.90008@linuxservices.co.nz> Organization: LINUX Services Ltd. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:40:53 -0000 Hello all: I am new to this list. I had a nice surprise to know yesterday, of the new features for gm, SIP! I've been trying installing all those soft phones mentioned on Linux (except the ones with wine) and really there's nothing I've liked. Is there anything I could help with to speed up the testing? iLBC is the codec of my preference since it works great on slow connections. Cheers, Carlos == daniel huhardeaux wrote: > michel memeteau a écrit : > >> you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only >> have G711 or >> maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s >> unlimited >> free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to >> call PSTN >> .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as >> they are >> the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned >> opening SIP >> devices against vonage.... >> >> A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... >> >> BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is >> really >> ....beta ..... >> >> > Hmmh, I find it more and more stable. If you don't want to use the > linux version, run the windows one with wine, works great, specially > with KDE. You also have SjPhone: simple but working. > >> if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) >> > FWD is only g711. Try sipgate or sipphone > From ian.firla@gmail.com Sat Feb 26 04:08:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079E53B099B for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:08:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10135-06 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:08:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8226A3B0A37 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:08:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so533001wri for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:08:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AFRN1+nVTkgXsajvyCJjOV0InxX47YoU4obU9YXh6FmIW35xu5qWMJ/WX2NGaXgRIN233J/FFyfay0LF++fcR/BnRIFbtxu4WD6ODLy3rIxqs3MSm60brtJsWIp1MXdX6jFbzcxsvsQhjNQkA8GqqeXCCQLKkdDIRff6HtS3C5A= Received: by 10.54.47.62 with SMTP id u62mr45074wru; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:08:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.14.25 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:08:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:08:17 +0100 From: Ian Firla To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ian Firla , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:08:45 -0000 Hello All, I've read through the archives on this error as well as on the make of my webcam and I haven't yet seen a solution for the problem that works for me so I'm trying again. OS: Ubuntu Debian/GNU Linux (tracking hoary aka unstable) Kernel: 2.6.10-4-amd64-generic Webcam: Logitech QuickCam Pro 3000 USB webcam Gnomemeeting version: 1.2.0 (used the Ubuntu deb package) Like others who have posted to the list, I have no problems using the webcam with other applications. Its built-in microphone works with Gnomemeeting. I get the famous "Error while opening video device /dev/video0" message when running gnomemeeting as a regular user and as root. I've noted that when starting up gnomeeting from the commandline, I see the following error message: kubla@ogmios:~ $ gnomemeeting & [1] 15104 kubla@ogmios:~ $ [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 The device has correct ownership and my user is a member of the video group: crw-rw---- 1 root video 81, 0 2005-02-26 09:33 /dev/video0 The relevant output from my syslog looks like this: Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 4 Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost kernel: Linux video capture interface: v1.00 Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost kernel: pwc Philips webcam module version 10.0.6-unofficial loaded. Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14040]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules' at line 49 applied, 'controlC2' becomes 'snd/%k' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14040]: creating device node '/dev/snd/controlC2'Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost usb.agent[13762]: snd-usb-audio: loaded successfully Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14144]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules' at line 51 applied, 'pcmC2D0c' becomes 'snd/%k' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14144]: creating device node '/dev/snd/pcmC2D0c' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14143]: creating device node '/dev/video0' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14128]: creating device node '/dev/dsp2' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14130]: creating device node '/dev/audio2' Feb 26 09:33:22 localhost udev[14132]: creating device node '/dev/mixer2' Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Supports Philips PCA645/646, PCVC675/680/690, PCVC720[40]/730/740/750 & PCVC830/840. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Also supports the Askey VC010, various Logitech Quickcams, Samsung MPC-C10 and MPC-C30, Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc the Creative WebCam 5 & Pro Ex, SOTEC Afina Eye and Visionite VCS-UC300 and VCS-UM100. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Trace options: 0x00a1 Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Logitech QuickCam Pro 3000 USB webcam detected. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: pwc Registered as /dev/video0. Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: usbcore: registered new driver Philips webcam Feb 26 09:33:38 localhost kernel: usbcore: registered new driver snd-usb-audio Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc Failed to set LED on/off time. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc set_video_mode(176x144 @ 10, palette 15). Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc decode_size = 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc Using alternate setting 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc set_video_mode(160x120 @ 10, palette 15). Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc decode_size = 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc Using alternate setting 1. Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc set_video_mode(160x120 @ 10, palette 15). Feb 26 09:33:40 localhost kernel: pwc decode_size = 1. Any ideas or suggestions? Many thanks in advance, Ian From lurch@gmx.li Sat Feb 26 06:49:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80A23B09BB for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:49:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16738-04 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:48:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352013B0982 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:48:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0ICI00A2VOTMTA@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (qmailr@hermes.kawo1.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.115.1]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j1QBmvos008973 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:57 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 32296 invoked from network); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:48:57 +0000 Received: from bachus.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de (134.130.112.7) by hermes.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:48:57 +0000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:54 +0100 From: Stefan Bruens Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 In-reply-to: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> To: Ian Firla , GnomeMeeting mailing list Message-id: <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lurch@gmx.li, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:49:03 -0000 --nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Samstag, 26. Februar 2005 10:08 schrieb Ian Firla: Try opening it with small size and with large size (Preferences->Video=20 Devices) Greetings, Stefan =2D-=20 Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 --nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCIGInb39KPYz+qlMRAuiLAKCnNun70HN4mw8HR7SEP3bYRQFoGACfSzon eBaLhloft+P8ph8rfCWyzcs= =Rb6n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1753047.ecNiTtevZh-- From ian.firla@gmail.com Sat Feb 26 07:22:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A943B0982 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:22:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18166-01 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:22:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0800D3B0747 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:22:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so544174wri for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=FzzPePdGfZSQvPgTg9MUgfyVg9/T5kR8hKg3qNQhob9KIEFtnQ+XQa4hlsabGwappH9v7SPJeVn+vpI8taXz7u4E+M0tBSGEXYfL3PU40UmoRLP7LU8OcVDcb0yGk7/B076ElZCQ0Fbxxk7OMY2tjomEswp1IcGcFop31WUD/W8= Received: by 10.54.43.77 with SMTP id q77mr13664wrq; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.14.25 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:22:54 +0100 From: Ian Firla To: lurch@gmx.li Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 In-Reply-To: <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: GnomeMeeting mailing list X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ian Firla , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:22:57 -0000 I tried that already. I also tried changing formats from ntsc to pal to secam, etc. Thanks anyway! Ian On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:48:54 +0100, Stefan Bruens wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Februar 2005 10:08 schrieb Ian Firla: >=20 > Try opening it with small size and with large size (Preferences->Video > Devices) >=20 > Greetings, >=20 > Stefan >=20 > -- > Stefan Br=FCns / Kastanienweg 6 - Zimmer 1206 / 52074 Aachen > mailto:lurch@gmx.li http://www.kawo1.rwth-aachen.de/~lurchi/ > phone: +49 241 169-4206 mobile: +49 160 3797725 >=20 >=20 > From asharma@samyak.com Sat Feb 26 08:49:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B428D3B08DE for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22724-04 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABED03B0979 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:20:33 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005022619203220998 ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:20:32 +0530 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:19:37 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2005 13:50:33.0187 (UTC) FILETIME=[24296330:01C51C0A] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: OpenH323 Mailing List Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:49:46 -0000 hello All, I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. ============================================ Packages:- pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 glib-2.6.2 pango-1.8.0 atk-1.9.0 gtk+-2.6.2 evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 howl-0.9.7-1 gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz And the devel packages also. System:- FEDORA CORE 1 ============================================ Error:- [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): should not be reached aborting... And a dialog box appears which says:- <<<< "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". <<<< Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- <<<<<<<< [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND ................ root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 gnomemeeting root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet .......... <<<<<<<<<< ============================================ My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to the latest GTK version. Please help me in this context. Thanks and regards, Ashutosh Sharma. From conrad_b@yahoo.com Sat Feb 26 20:12:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B733B06D5 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:12:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18504-01 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:12:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from web41508.mail.yahoo.com (web41508.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.91]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7090E3B0670 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:12:39 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 53282 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Feb 2005 01:12:38 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=ntYcgrVkYBIKEM0yE7Pj9RTGnWsqG5jvc5rZ0+pULjOHX1SQE8wRayNNdHM6uEeEnGud6H1+mlAwccE04nq5JrKlNk70LNXLgTIJWLKRfe8rEUjldSBn5lH/MeSsdWcUA1dCdIqXIyFfgOurrumI/ulO5e6J6LFby5xj5tFdc7Y= ; Message-ID: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.227.18.13] by web41508.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:12:38 CET Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:12:38 +0100 (CET) From: Conrad Beckert To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:12:41 -0000 Hi, sorry for asking a question that might have been asked before. I run SUSE 9.1 and thuse have automake 1.8.2 installed. The autogen.sh script complains: checking for autoconf >= 2.53... testing autoconf2.50... not found. testing autoconf... found 2.59 checking for automake >= 1.7... testing automake-1.7... not found. ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 installed to build gnomemeeting. Download the appropriate package for from your distribution or get the source tarball at http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/automake/automake-1.7.tar.gz checking for libtool >= 1.4.3... testing libtoolize... found 1.5.2 checking for glib-gettext >= 2.2.0... testing glib-gettextize... found 2.2.3 checking for intltool >= 0.25... testing intltoolize... found 0.30 checking for pkg-config >= 0.14.0... testing pkg-config... found 0.15.0 ./autogen.sh: line 1: --print-ac-dir: command not found Checking for required M4 macros... libtool.m4 not found glib-gettext.m4 not found intltool.m4 not found pkg.m4 not found Checking for forbidden M4 macros... ***Error***: some autoconf macros required to build gnomemeeting were not found in your aclocal path, or some forbidden macros were found. Perhaps you need to adjust your ACLOCAL_PATH? automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.8.3 Written by Tom Tromey . What's wrong? Conrad ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de From jan.schampera@web.de Sat Feb 26 20:24:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915ED3B076C for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18839-07 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546113B0670 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd11.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5DAj-0006qv-01; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:37 +0100 Received: from router.home.thebonsai.de (SrjQV-ZE8e0c-Wl6W0YaDEN4nMvADK20Xciuu+u15IpTX0lTwsMysY@[217.224.196.243]) by fmrl11.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D5DAh-1vLE000; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 Received: from mainserver.home.thebonsai.de (mainserver.home.thebonsai.de [192.168.64.3]) by router.home.thebonsai.de (8.12.6/TheBonsai) with SMTP id j1R1Oa1N011520 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:36 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 From: Jan Schampera To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS Message-ID: <20050227022435.5d21e94f@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> In-Reply-To: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: SrjQV-ZE8e0c-Wl6W0YaDEN4nMvADK20Xciuu+u15IpTX0lTwsMysY@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: af9b578d-4205-4925-9c14-2acf2e7a4f70 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:24:40 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:12:38 +0100 (CET) Conrad Beckert wrote: > checking for automake >= 1.7... > testing automake-1.7... not found. > ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 installed Which is your autoconf version? J. -- "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." - J. B. Postel, master of the net. From jan.schampera@web.de Sat Feb 26 21:00:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6A93B070A for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:00:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19986-07 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:00:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.83]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62A93B06D5 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:00:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5DjJ-0004Cj-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:21 +0100 Received: from router.home.thebonsai.de (GvancQZBoeE3MVipGQ-TbeUFndADWNsNfVKg5jy+oxzYu5+LelrS8f@[217.224.196.243]) by fmrl09.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D5Dj8-0go83M0; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:10 +0100 Received: from mainserver.home.thebonsai.de (mainserver.home.thebonsai.de [192.168.64.3]) by router.home.thebonsai.de (8.12.6/TheBonsai) with SMTP id j1R20B1N012120 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:09 +0100 From: Jan Schampera To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS Message-ID: <20050227030009.7f750279@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> In-Reply-To: <20050227022435.5d21e94f@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> References: <20050227011238.53280.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> <20050227022435.5d21e94f@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> Organization: private X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: GvancQZBoeE3MVipGQ-TbeUFndADWNsNfVKg5jy+oxzYu5+LelrS8f@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: b843488e-7b19-4fe5-8248-b35a4be83148 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:00:23 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 Jan Schampera wrote: > > checking for automake >= 1.7... > > testing automake-1.7... not found. > > ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 installed > Which is your autoconf version? Automake of course :) J. -- "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." - J. B. Postel, master of the net. From conrad_b@yahoo.com Sun Feb 27 06:28:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBB63B091B for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:28:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10913-06 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:28:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from web41507.mail.yahoo.com (web41507.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.90]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C52C3B07BE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:28:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 66407 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Feb 2005 11:28:41 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=UZBLT2+2hzLhNnNPnAbPEQUb+q9nYVVLxYeHMshr0L7YJnI7H60dvhyNHpn1uDrwRGn/1/5MuQaLceRjukKqSKYgCYWcMS2+kCm3ShHTFAVHeGZET5UIEPzmScDflrMJdkPbuCcf/ebU3N8jtQUdjPLmchcyoZEUX4CAVbDRU/A= ; Message-ID: <20050227112841.66405.qmail@web41507.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.227.18.13] by web41507.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:41 CET Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:41 +0100 (CET) From: Conrad Beckert Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050227030009.7f750279@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:28:45 -0000 --- Jan Schampera schrieb: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:24:35 +0100 > Jan Schampera wrote: > > > > > checking for automake >= 1.7... > > > testing automake-1.7... not found. > > > ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.7 > installed > > Which is your autoconf version? > Automake of course :) > automake 1.8.3 - the one that comes with SuSE 9.1 autoconf 2.59 - dito Conrad ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de From jan.schampera@web.de Sun Feb 27 11:22:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17D53B0669 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:22:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25090-02 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:22:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA603B066D for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:22:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5RBL-0000bu-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:11 +0100 Received: from router.home.thebonsai.de (S+6eoaZOYemMXSS8M1j0f8RdjQdRucJuzTGgnkvoRcxcOIaQ8+pMEk@[217.95.206.205]) by fmrl09.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D5RBI-1xMtLk0; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:08 +0100 Received: from mainserver.home.thebonsai.de (mainserver.home.thebonsai.de [192.168.64.3]) by router.home.thebonsai.de (8.12.6/TheBonsai) with SMTP id j1RGM81N032111 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:08 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:07 +0100 From: Jan Schampera To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Compile GM CVS Message-ID: <20050227172207.452b4df7@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> In-Reply-To: <20050227112841.66405.qmail@web41507.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050227030009.7f750279@mainserver.home.thebonsai.de> <20050227112841.66405.qmail@web41507.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: S+6eoaZOYemMXSS8M1j0f8RdjQdRucJuzTGgnkvoRcxcOIaQ8+pMEk@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: 80cb79a5-7cc9-4a8b-9102-2ddd8a8104b2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:22:18 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:41 +0100 (CET) Conrad Beckert wrote: > > Automake of course :) > automake 1.8.3 - the one that comes with SuSE 9.1 > autoconf 2.59 - dito I had a simelar problem. Automake 1.6 and Automake 1.9 installed. The ./autogen.sh told me the same. I tracked it down to my Automake M4-Makro that tests that: it only knew up to 1.7. So I changed autogen.sh to look for minimum AM 1.6. Then it found my 1.6.3 package. Maybe you could do simelar. Again, the problem are the auto*.m4 macros. J. -- "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." - J. B. Postel, master of the net. From jonny.strom@netikka.fi Mon Feb 28 03:15:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93E63B08D7 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04573-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:15:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.linuxvaasa.com (av8.netikka.fi [213.250.83.8]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3453B081A for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:15:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [213.250.83.8] (mail.linuxvaasa.com [213.250.83.8]) by mail.linuxvaasa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF3F111362 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:15:33 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4222D325.7010204@netikka.fi> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:15:33 +0200 From: Johnny Strom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; sv-SE; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GnomeMeeting mailing list Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> In-Reply-To: <1109339753.1016.9.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:15:37 -0000 Damien Sandras wrote: > Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 14:42 +0100, michel memeteau a écrit : > >>you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only have G711 or >>maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s unlimited >>free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to call PSTN >>.... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as they are >>the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned opening SIP >>devices against vonage.... >> >>A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... >> >>BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is really >>....beta ..... > > > I only know kphone, linphone, phonegaim and ... GnomeMeeting. > There is mythphone as well but you need mythtv it is not intended for standard desktop use. > >>if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) >> > > > Not sure if FWD-out supports that. > > >>cheers > > From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:27:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6033B09BF for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:27:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09250-06 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:27:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C203B095E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:27:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8F418F7E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:33:08 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] fresh new CVS snaps =) From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <421FA91F.90008@linuxservices.co.nz> References: <1109332204.5175.16.camel@ganymede> <1109336269.421f20cdb02b3@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <1109336563.3418.40.camel@golgoth01> <1109338943.421f2b3fe4571@webmail.marseille-wireless.org> <421F4CEC.9070905@tootai.net> <421FA91F.90008@linuxservices.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:27:22 +0100 Message-Id: <1109582842.3614.18.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:27:26 -0000 Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 11:39 +1300, Carlos Hernandez a écrit : > Hello all: > I am new to this list. I had a nice surprise to know yesterday, of the > new features for gm, SIP! > I've been trying installing all those soft phones mentioned on Linux > (except the ones with wine) and really there's nothing I've liked. > Is there anything I could help with to speed up the testing? > > iLBC is the codec of my preference since it works great on slow > connections. > In a few days we will have binaries available again, for easy installation. I will announce it here, and announce what works and what's broken. In all cases it will be parallel installable with GnomeMeeting 1.2, so that you can use both. > Cheers, > Carlos > > == > > daniel huhardeaux wrote: > > > michel memeteau a écrit : > > > >> you are gonna laugh , it s even worst than that , I think they only > >> have G711 or > >> maybe GSM , for the moment when I call in an australian PSTN ( it s > >> unlimited > >> free ) it s using G711 , so it could be impossible for a dialup to > >> call PSTN > >> .... By the way I don t understand why they dont use an open IPBX as > >> they are > >> the guy from Linspire and phongaim and stuff ..... and they proned > >> opening SIP > >> devices against vonage.... > >> > >> A lot of people have asked on their forum but no reason was given ..... > >> > >> BTW , could you point me to other SIP clients ??? Xlite on linux is > >> really > >> ....beta ..... > >> > >> > > Hmmh, I find it more and more stable. If you don't want to use the > > linux version, run the windows one with wine, works great, specially > > with KDE. You also have SjPhone: simple but working. > > > >> if you have a SIP service using speex or ILBC (FWD ??) > >> > > FWD is only g711. Try sipgate or sipphone > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:29:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5F63B09B5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:29:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09488-05 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:29:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F98C3B07F5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:29:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108A61B67D; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:35:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , Ian Firla In-Reply-To: <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:29:37 +0100 Message-Id: <1109582977.3614.20.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: lurch@gmx.li X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:29:50 -0000 Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 13:22 +0100, Ian Firla a écrit : > I tried that already. > > I also tried changing formats from ntsc to pal to secam, etc. > > Thanks anyway! I have not tried GnomeMeeting yet with a recent kernel, but I know there was a bug in the driver. Can you try loading pwcx ? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:31:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09793B09B5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:31:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09688-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:31:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2393B09C6 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:31:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933B018F7E; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:37:00 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> References: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:31:15 +0100 Message-Id: <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: OpenH323 Mailing List X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:31:22 -0000 Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 19:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > hello All, > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > ============================================ > Packages:- > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > glib-2.6.2 > pango-1.8.0 > atk-1.9.0 > gtk+-2.6.2 > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > howl-0.9.7-1 > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > And the devel packages also. > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > ============================================ > Error:- > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > That can be safely ignored. > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): > should not be reached > aborting... > You need to upgrade liborbit/bonobo-activation-server. I wonder why it is not a dependancy. > And a dialog box appears which says:- > <<<< > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". > <<<< > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > <<<<<<<< > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > ................ > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > gnomemeeting > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > .......... > <<<<<<<<<< > ============================================ > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > the latest GTK version. > > Please help me in this context. > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 04:34:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5849D3B0A0E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:34:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09859-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0090A3B09ED for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:34:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D4B1B670 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:39:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Setup question From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <200502252132.07907.rdorsch@web.de> References: <200502061815.27571.rdorsch@web.de> <200502242339.20416.rdorsch@web.de> <1109323650.3418.24.camel@golgoth01> <200502252132.07907.rdorsch@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:34:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1109583242.3614.25.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:34:11 -0000 Le vendredi 25 février 2005 à 21:32 +0100, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : > > Is that dumped into a file? I am enabling the forwarding with gconftool-2 via > a shell console. > Unfortunately not... Can't you do a ssh -X to export the display and see in real time what's happening? My guess is that the call forwarding is not activated for some obscure reason. (It could even be a bug). > > > > What happens in the GUI when you activate call forwarding, isn't there > > an error message? > > I did not watch the GUI while enabling since I did that from remote. I did not > see a popup error box, when I returned to the workstation, running the > gnomemeeting forwarding the call. > > When starting up gnomemeeting 1.2.1 I sometimes see > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > This is with forwarding disabled and happens only sometimes. > That's a warning from libhowl, it can be safely ignored. The ideal is to check the general history, I will try call forwarding again tonight at home to make sure it is not broken. Perhaps another GM 1.2 user can try too and report back? > Thanks, > Rainer > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From asharma@samyak.com Mon Feb 28 04:58:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA403B0881 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:58:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11140-03 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from sipl09.maildc.com (unknown [210.211.251.49]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5121A3B087F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:58:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from uu-3-160.buydomains.com ([10.100.112.9] RDNS failed) by sipl09.maildc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:29:34 +0530 Received: from [10.100.112.25] ([10.100.112.25]) by uu-3-160.buydomains.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005022815293330238 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:29:34 +0530 Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 From: Ashutosh Sharma To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> References: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Organization: Samayk Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Message-Id: <1109584728.3980.48.camel@sipl25> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:28:48 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2005 09:59:34.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[34C568B0:01C51D7C] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:58:51 -0000 Hi , Well thanks for the help. But I was able to make that Socket problem resolved by starting the mDNSResponder. But regarding the second one as you suggested about the liborbit and libbonobo, I had installed these prior to installing GM1.2.0 =20 Sorry I forgot to mention about all the packages. THese packages were:- ORBit2-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 ORBit2-devel-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 libbonobo-2.4.3 libbonoboui-2.4.3 Thanks and regards, Ashutosh On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 15:01, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le samedi 26 f=C3=A9vrier 2005 =C3=A0 19:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a =C3= =A9crit : > > hello All, > >=20 > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Packages:-=20 > > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > > glib-2.6.2 > > pango-1.8.0 > > atk-1.9.0 > > gtk+-2.6.2 > > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > > howl-0.9.7-1 > >=20 > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > >=20 > > And the devel packages also. > >=20 > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Error:- > >=20 > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > >=20 >=20 > That can be safely ignored. >=20 >=20 >=20 > >=20 > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv):=20 > > should not be reached > > aborting... > >=20 >=20 > You need to upgrade liborbit/bonobo-activation-server. I wonder why it > is not a dependancy. >=20 >=20 > > And a dialog box appears which says:- > > <<<< > > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)".=20 > > <<<< > >=20 > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > > <<<<<<<< > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > >=20 > > ................ > > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > > gnomemeeting > > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00=20 > > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > > .......... > > <<<<<<<<<< > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >=20 > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > > the latest GTK version. > > =20 > > Please help me in this context. > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > > Ashutosh Sharma. > >=20 > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 05:06:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A173B08D6 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11701-05 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:06:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76B33B09FB for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:05:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E73BDF9 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:11:44 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <1109584728.3980.48.camel@sipl25> References: <1109425777.3983.17.camel@sipl25> <1109583075.3614.22.camel@golgoth01> <1109584728.3980.48.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:05:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1109585159.3614.55.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:06:46 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 15:28 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi , > > Well thanks for the help. But I was able to make that Socket problem > resolved by starting the mDNSResponder. > Indeed, that is what I consider as a bug in the library. It should silently fail. > But regarding the second one as you suggested about the liborbit and > libbonobo, I had installed these prior to installing GM1.2.0 > > Sorry I forgot to mention about all the packages. > THese packages were:- > > ORBit2-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 > ORBit2-devel-2.9.8-0.ximian.6.1 > libbonobo-2.4.3 > libbonoboui-2.4.3 > I will let Johnny comment on this, he is our fedora guy :) > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh > > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 15:01, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 19:19 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > > hello All, > > > > > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > > > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > > > ============================================ > > > Packages:- > > > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > > > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > > > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > > > glib-2.6.2 > > > pango-1.8.0 > > > atk-1.9.0 > > > gtk+-2.6.2 > > > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > > > howl-0.9.7-1 > > > > > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > > > > > And the devel packages also. > > > > > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > > > ============================================ > > > Error:- > > > > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > > > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > > > > > > That can be safely ignored. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > > > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): > > > should not be reached > > > aborting... > > > > > > > You need to upgrade liborbit/bonobo-activation-server. I wonder why it > > is not a dependancy. > > > > > > > And a dialog box appears which says:- > > > <<<< > > > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > > > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". > > > <<<< > > > > > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > > > <<<<<<<< > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > > > > > ................ > > > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > > > gnomemeeting > > > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 > > > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > > > .......... > > > <<<<<<<<<< > > > ============================================ > > > > > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > > > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > > > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > > > the latest GTK version. > > > > > > Please help me in this context. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From james.ellis@gmail.com Mon Feb 28 05:37:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BB23B0980 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:37:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13319-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:37:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01953B07F5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:37:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so210627rne for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ujp9KXbUrwTT3Lu9eKYc0ih5hh1smDhn+44/HrMD612wELFwQ0CxAVi49zWQCtZS1jSm1HDJPcZM1v2FfGJs1aWXEG9saDgchBGJ+BEwOxzTjtLElMLYAkOVCQV4+oNADx38X77l3hAUjeRHpXj75BkSI58NgMAcAneHHe9A1ns= Received: by 10.38.12.21 with SMTP id 21mr101126rnl; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.86.19 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:37:17 +0000 From: James Ellis To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] gm and dlink router with NAT X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: James Ellis , GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:37:19 -0000 Hi This is my first post here.... I'm trying to set up gnomemeeting (1.02) on my FC3 box, this has gone ok and the program has picked up my Cam - a PWC 840 - and Microphone ok. I believe the firewall on my dlink router (724) is cauing some problems.. does anyone have any knowledge of how to transpose the port information available in the gm website FAQ to the dlink configuration (I've tried and failed) ? Dlink suggest that the box be placed in the "DMZ" - outside the firewall but I don't think that is a suitable answer. Thanks and cheers James From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 05:43:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CD53B09FA for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:43:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13607-08 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:43:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735793B0A2F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:43:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D242116EB; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:48:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] gm and dlink router with NAT From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , James Ellis In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:43:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1109587387.3614.67.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:43:14 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 10:37 +0000, James Ellis a écrit : > Hi > > This is my first post here.... > > I'm trying to set up gnomemeeting (1.02) on my FC3 box, this has gone > ok and the program has picked up my Cam - a PWC 840 - and Microphone > ok. > I believe the firewall on my dlink router (724) is cauing some > problems.. does anyone have any knowledge of how to transpose the port > information available in the gm website FAQ to the dlink configuration > (I've tried and failed) ? > > Dlink suggest that the box be placed in the "DMZ" - outside the > firewall but I don't think that is a suitable answer. The easiest is to use GM 1.2. I think (but I'm not sure) that DLink routers are not of the type "Symmetric NAT". In short words, that means that you do not have to forward any port as long as you are using STUN support in GnomeMeeting. It makes things easier. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 07:29:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687133B0730 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:29:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19977-03 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BACB3B08AE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9644AB40; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:35:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Fwd: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1] From: Damien Sandras To: Ashutosh Sharma In-Reply-To: <1109592911.3980.170.camel@sipl25> References: <1109585374.3614.59.camel@golgoth01> <4222F49E.6030700@netikka.fi> <1109592911.3980.170.camel@sipl25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:29:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1109593788.8626.2.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Johnny Strom , gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:29:51 -0000 Hi, Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 17:45 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > Hi, > Well thanks. > And I am sorry. I think the problem was from my side only. Actually I > forgot to remove the builtin GM 0.98.5 version. Now when I uninstalled > it then I again did make && make install and it works fine. Thanks once > again for the help and I am sorry. No problem :) > Anyway the new GM is really very nice. I saw and then I found that in > the Audio Codec List there is no option for G.723.1 because in the > earlier versions it used to be there. Yes, it automagically appears now when available, but it is only available when using Quicknet cards (no driver yet for the 2.6 kernel though) > And I want to know why there are two different Audio Plugins > (OSS/Quicknet). If I have Quicknet h/w and then I select OSS then is > this fine ?? or will it hamper the overall performance. > If you have Quicknet hardware and select OSS (or ALSA), then it will use OSS (or ALSA) but not Quicknet hardware, it means that G.723.1 won't be available, and it also means that you will use your soundcard instead of a real POTS or headset plugged into the Quicknet card. > Also I want to know is there any PTZ Camera and WebCam which may have > the compatibility with the OpenH323 and GM. Because I don't know but you > people might have used it while doing conferencing. I don't know what a PTZ camera is, but any camera compatible with video4Linux and supported by the Linux kernel will work with GnomeMeeting. I usually recommend Philips cameras (ToUCam PRO). > > Thanks and regards, > Ashutosh. > > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 16:08, Johnny Strom wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > Here I have the following versions of Orbit and Bonobo on fedora core 2 > > and it works fine here: > > > > > > Bonobo: > > bonobo-1.0.22-8.1 > > gnome-python2-bonobo-2.0.0-4.1 > > libbonobo-devel-2.6.2-1 > > libbonoboui-2.6.0-1 > > bonobo-devel-1.0.22-8.1 > > libbonobo-2.6.2-1 > > libbonoboui-devel-2.6.0-1 > > > > > > Orbit: > > ORBit-0.5.17-11.4.1 > > ORBit2-devel-2.10.0-4 > > ORBit2-2.10.0-4 > > ORBit-devel-0.5.17-11.4.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Damien Sandras wrote: > > > -------- Message transféré -------- > > > De: Ashutosh Sharma > > > Répondre à : GnomeMeeting mailing list > > > ä: GnomeMeeting mailing list > > > Cc: OpenH323 Mailing List > > > Objet: [GnomeMeeting-list] Problem Launching GM1.2.0 on FC1 > > > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:19:37 +0530 > > > hello All, > > > > > > I have compiled GnomeMeeting 1.2.0 without any errors. But I am > > > facing the problem while starting GnomeMeeting. > > > ============================================ > > > Packages:- > > > pkgconfig-0.15.0.tar.gz > > > tiff-v3.6.1.tar.gz > > > jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > > libpng-1.2.8.tar.bz2 > > > glib-2.6.2 > > > pango-1.8.0 > > > atk-1.9.0 > > > gtk+-2.6.2 > > > evolution-data-server-0.0.94.1-1 > > > howl-0.9.7-1 > > > > > > gnomemeeting-1.2.0.tar.gz > > > > > > And the devel packages also. > > > > > > System:- FEDORA CORE 1 > > > ============================================ > > > Error:- > > > > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]# gnomemeeting -c 10.100.112.8:1720 > > > [assert] error: 111 (Connection refused) > > > [assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_tcp_connect", line: 720 > > > > > > > > > Bonobo-ERROR **: file bonobo-main.c: line 352 > > > (bonobo_poa_get_threadedv): > > > should not be reached > > > aborting... > > > > > > And a dialog box appears which says:- > > > <<<< > > > "Application "gnomemeeting" (process 27344) has crashed > > > due to a fatal error.(Aborted)". > > > <<<< > > > > > > Now if I see the background processes then it is something like this:- > > > <<<<<<<< > > > [root@sipl26 gnomemeeting-1.2.0]#ps -aux > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > > > > > ................ > > > root 27404 24.3 12.9 64268 16348 ? S 16:58 0:10 > > > gnomemeeting > > > root 27433 0.2 6.0 18076 7564 ? S 16:58 0:00 > > > /usr/libexec/gnome_segv gnomemeet > > > .......... > > > <<<<<<<<<< > > > ============================================ > > > > > > My first suspicion is on the GTK version 2.6. Is GM1.2 is compatible > > > with GTK 2.6 version or not. Actually the GTK-2.4.x versions are having > > > some problems while compiling, that's why I decided to switch over to > > > the latest GTK version. > > > > > > Please help me in this context. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ashutosh Sharma. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > > > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk Mon Feb 28 07:42:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317AF3B099B for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:42:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20570-01 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:42:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx01.stofanet.dk (mx01.stofanet.dk [212.10.10.11]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0A73B0744 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:42:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from 3e6b2209.rev.stofanet.dk ([62.107.34.9]) by mx01.stofanet.dk (envelope-from ) with esmtp id 1D5kED-0002Eb-1r for gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:42:26 +0100 From: Duncan Lithgow To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:42:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502281342.31520.duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Can't contact LDAP server. X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk, GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:42:29 -0000 Okay, freshly installed on FC3 but no joy yet. a. on firing it up from the command line i get: --- Cannot contact the user directory Failed to bind to user directory: Can't contact LDAP server. --- b. how do i get it to appear on the applications menu? Ideas for fixing these? Thanks, Duncan -- Linux user #372812: more stable and cheaper than windows GnuPG Public Key ID: 0x2BB9667C21A8C63A: protecting your security From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 07:45:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C1F3B099B for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:45:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20794-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:45:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F7A3B08F4 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:45:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C421B442; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:51:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Can't contact LDAP server. From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list , duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk In-Reply-To: <200502281342.31520.duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk> References: <200502281342.31520.duncan@lithgow-schmidt.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:45:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1109594739.8626.13.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:45:42 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 13:42 +0100, Duncan Lithgow a écrit : > Okay, freshly installed on FC3 but no joy yet. > > a. on firing it up from the command line i get: > --- > Cannot contact the user directory > Failed to bind to user directory: Can't contact LDAP server. > --- > When do you get that? When trying to refresh the LDAP server or the ILS server? The LDAP server is for future extension, it is not supported yet. The ILS server should work. > b. how do i get it to appear on the applications menu? > It should be available in the GNOME menus after installation. If not, it is a bug in the packages you have used to install GnomeMeeting. Actually you should have : /usr/share/applications/gnomemeeting.desktop And once you have that, it should appear in the menu in the "Internet" category. Perhaps your distribution is using another path, for example, SuSE is using /opt/usr instead of /usr/ iirc. > Ideas for fixing these? Thanks, Duncan > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From macciardi@arnet.com.ar Thu Feb 17 21:55:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DDB3B0718 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:55:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25040-06 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:55:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp6.arnet.com.ar (smtp6.arnet.com.ar [200.45.191.24]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D4033B067F for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:55:13 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 29683 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2005 02:54:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?201.252.17.5?) (201.252.17.5) by smtp6.arnet.com.ar with SMTP; 18 Feb 2005 02:54:14 -0000 Message-ID: <42152318.3020002@arnet.com.ar> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:04:56 +0100 From: Mariano Acciardi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:10 -0500 Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] Interface language X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:55:17 -0000 Hi all, I wan't to ask some question. I'just installed gnomemeeting Version GnomeMeeting 1.0.2 on KDE and the language of the screen interface I think is german. Can I change language to English? I didn't found the place in menu to to this. Are they some files to modify? Thank you Best Regards Mariano From Philippe.Combes@ens-lyon.fr Sat Feb 26 19:15:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4BD3B0890 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:15:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16784-01 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:15:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B193B08C1 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:15:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from [82.253.121.230] (lns-vlq-37-lyo-82-253-121-230.adsl.proxad.net [82.253.121.230]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEE12BEEA9 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:15:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <42211244.8080106@ens-lyon.fr> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:20:20 +0100 From: Philippe Combes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr-ch, fr-be, fr-lu, fr-mc, en-gb, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:32 -0500 Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] ALSA not detected X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:15:17 -0000 Hi all, I am not a subscriber to the list, so please let me in CC... I have compiled GM 1.2 on my system (Debian sid - 2.4.27) and installed it, as well as its dependencies (PWLib, openH323) in /usr/local. I have compiled, installed and loaded the alsa modules for my kernel, and I can listen to audio files with my sound card (so it seems my ALSA modules work ! - the old OSS driver for my card has not been built in my kernel, and so is not involved) But the DRUID does not detect ALSA and only propose Quicknet choice as regards the audio plugin. I guess it is a problem of ALSA installation, but what ? What does the druid look for to detect ALSA ? Thanks in advance for any help. Philippe From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 08:09:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434173B0744 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:09:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22781-08 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:09:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97EF3B0730 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:09:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98C31B46F; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:15:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Interface language From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42152318.3020002@arnet.com.ar> References: <42152318.3020002@arnet.com.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:09:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1109596175.8626.18.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Mariano Acciardi X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:09:37 -0000 Hello, Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 00:04 +0100, Mariano Acciardi a écrit : > Hi all, > > I wan't to ask some question. I'just installed gnomemeeting Version > GnomeMeeting 1.0.2 on KDE and the language of the screen interface I > think is german. Can I change language to English? I didn't found the > place in menu to to this. Are they some files to modify? > It is a setting of your distribution. There is no configuration in GnomeMeeting for this, but there is certainly a tool in your distribution to change it. If you can not change it, just run GnomeMeeting from a terminal this way : LC_ALL=C gnomemeeting It will be in english. > Thank you > Best Regards > Mariano > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 08:11:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895523B0876 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22966-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7BC3B0800 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A859412BEF; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:17:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] ALSA not detected From: Damien Sandras To: GnomeMeeting mailing list In-Reply-To: <42211244.8080106@ens-lyon.fr> References: <42211244.8080106@ens-lyon.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:11:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1109596309.8626.22.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: Philippe Combes X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:11:51 -0000 Hi, Le dimanche 27 février 2005 à 01:20 +0100, Philippe Combes a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am not a subscriber to the list, so please let me in CC... > There is so much SPAM that you have been lucky that I have seen your email in the mass of spams. > I have compiled GM 1.2 on my system (Debian sid - 2.4.27) and installed > it, as well as its dependencies (PWLib, openH323) in /usr/local. > I have compiled, installed and loaded the alsa modules for my kernel, > and I can listen to audio files with my sound card (so it seems my ALSA > modules work ! - the old OSS driver for my card has not been built in my > kernel, and so is not involved) > > But the DRUID does not detect ALSA and only propose Quicknet choice as > regards the audio plugin. > I guess it is a problem of ALSA installation, but what ? > What does the druid look for to detect ALSA ? > the alsa plugin has probably not been compiled because you don't have libasound-dev, or it has not been installed in /usr/lib/pwlib/ or /usr/local/lib/pwlib/ But why don't you use standard debian packages to get 1.2? damien@golgoth01:~$ apt-cache policy gnomemeeting gnomemeeting: Installés : (aucun) Candidat : 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-2 Table de version : 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-2 0 500 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/main Packages damien@golgoth01:~$ It even contains the 1.2.1 patches! > Thanks in advance for any help. > > Philippe > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From dsandras@seconix.com Mon Feb 28 08:54:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348C43B06CA for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:54:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25590-05 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:54:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from seconix.com (seconix.com [213.193.144.104]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5D03B0A47 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:53:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc-dhcp-44.telecom.fpms.ac.be (unknown [193.190.210.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by seconix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0CAC457; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:59:38 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Error while opening video device /dev/video0 From: Damien Sandras To: Ian Firla In-Reply-To: <11e9231d050228054064ee3c77@mail.gmail.com> References: <11e9231d0502260108e5866d@mail.gmail.com> <200502261248.55847.lurch@gmx.li> <11e9231d05022604225cf6af99@mail.gmail.com> <1109582977.3614.20.camel@golgoth01> <11e9231d050228054064ee3c77@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:53:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1109598832.8626.34.camel@golgoth01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Cc: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:54:49 -0000 Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 14:40 +0100, Ian Firla a écrit : > I only appear to have the pwc module compiled. > > Where can I grab the sources for pwcx? > Here: http://www.saillard.org/linux/pwc/ > Ian > > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:29:37 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le samedi 26 février 2005 à 13:22 +0100, Ian Firla a écrit : > > > I tried that already. > > > > > > I also tried changing formats from ntsc to pal to secam, etc. > > > > > > Thanks anyway! > > > > I have not tried GnomeMeeting yet with a recent kernel, but I know there > > was a bug in the driver. Can you try loading pwcx ? > > > > -- > > _ Damien Sandras > > (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ > > //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org > > v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com > > > > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com From Peter.K.Martin@t-online.de Mon Feb 28 12:37:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2973B0D45 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:37:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08527-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:37:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578053B0D87 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:36:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from fwd30.aul.t-online.de by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D5ooZ-00033i-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:36:15 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.76] (XGZ7o+Zv8e6bsUXNzlYTDQHJsa8slukTFxVhdLgd4qjejM+ZP11SrY@[217.244.215.129]) by fwd30.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D5ooU-05wTXE0; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:36:10 +0100 From: "Peter K. Martin" To: GnomeMeeting Mailing Liste Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:35:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502281836.06676.peter.k.martin@t-online.de> X-ID: XGZ7o+Zv8e6bsUXNzlYTDQHJsa8slukTFxVhdLgd4qjejM+ZP11SrY X-TOI-MSGID: 9ccc09b6-5f29-4a6b-9639-7bd2237471f7 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] GnomeMeeting 1.2 and SuSE 9.2 X-BeenThere: gnomemeeting-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Id: GnomeMeeting mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:37:36 -0000 --nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, today I tried to install GnomeMeeting 1.2. I got the download RPMs for SuSE= =20 9.1 and so I think there are little incompatibilities as I get error messag= es=20 from YaST like missing liblber.so.199 libldap_r.so.199 libldap.so.199 the OpenLDAP-client 2 is installed via YaST. So I don't know what to do at = the=20 moment. Perhaps there is someone who kindly compile a version of RPMs for=20 SuSE 9.2? You get with the SuSE 9.2 Distrib. only the version 1.0 of GnomeMeeting and= I=20 think there are a lot of improvements in version 1.2. Kind regards Peter =2D-=20 --nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCI1aGhlrz1G3ipzQRApyCAJwLdfqh5kn8CcU28fde/EmHC2iD5gCfdBDh YsyLVBeo+TYPfBszufjP3R4= =+Hkv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2148720.IEJQHgCZlK--