Re: [gupnp] problem with GUPnPLastChangeParser

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Sven Neumann <s neumann raumfeld com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 19:07 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>
>>    Does the attached patch solves the problem for you?
>
> It looks as if it should fix the problem. Will test it tomorrow.
>
> But there's still a problem. Consider an unsigned int variable where the
> whole range of possible values is allowed and valid. How would I deal
> with such a value given the current API of GUPnPLastChangeParser?

   True but what are the chances of you needing all the possible
values of gint64? Also if you are sent a value that is the same as you
already had, is there really a need to know if it was sent or not?

    Anyway, I am all open to API improvements/additions.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com