Re: [sigc] How to use sigc::bind<>

[Jeff Franks <jcf tpg com au>]

Martin Schulze wrote:

> You are right, it seems to work! I'm surprised that the right function
> overload is chosen automatically for bind() without the number! I hope
> this is not gcc specific. I will commit this change to cvs. Should we
> change to zero based argument counting for bind<#>, then? Don't forget
> that this might cause even more confusion for people who use selectors
> _1, _2, etc. from any lambda library or bind1st(), bind2nd() from stl.
> I really don't know what will be more intuitive: 0,1,2... or 1,2,3...
How about the other adapters like hide<>. I noticed that this change 
looks like it duplicates the code in the bind.h compatibilty file.

Regards,

Jeff.