Re: simplifications



On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 04:55, Bowie Owens wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> >>I now understand what you are trying to do. I think I can get through it 
> >>pretty quickly.
> >>
> I created the branch and unwound CVS as I described in my previous 
> email. Then in HEAD I completed the simplifications you were aiming for. 
> The POA_X::Y classes no longer inherit from X::Y and the 
> _orbitcpp::stub::X::Y is completely merged down into X::Y. Can you 
> update and give this a check over.
> 
> The new generated code compiles against my project. Libbonobomm doesn't 
> compile anymore because the following files reference 
> _orbitcpp::stub::X::Y classes directly when they should now use X::Y:
> ./bonobomm/servers/unknown_cimpl.cc
> ./bonobomm/servers/listener.cc
> 
> Can you take care of this Murray?

Yes, I will try to do that next week. Thanks a lot for fixing my mess.

> >OK. You're the maintainer now. That makes sense.
> >
> >Could you add tests for the problems that you found? Then I can fix
> >those problems.
> >
> I'll try and get around to this soon. So far libbonobomm is a pretty 
> comprehensive test. Unfortunately everything.idl from the ORBit2 test 
> suite exposes a bug where in orbitcpp.

OK. I'll try to look at that too. I guess you mean a runtime bug with
the simplified code.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]