From named@tta2.trackdowninc.com Mon Jun 1 09:19:40 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615D67500E5 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:19:40 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.481 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.481 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0.56, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RDNS_NONE=0.1] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (NAT!) (up: 1063 hrs), (distance 12, link: pppoe (DSL)), [63.230.231.13] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AoQA03mEMnwT for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:19:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tta2.trackdowninc.com (unknown [63.230.231.13]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D8A7501ED for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:19:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tta2.trackdowninc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tta2.trackdowninc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n519JLGV012527 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:19:21 -0700 Received: (from named@localhost) by tta2.trackdowninc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n519JLLx012526; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:19:21 -0700 Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:19:21 -0700 Message-Id: <200906010919.n519JLLx012526@tta2.trackdowninc.com> To: release-team@gnome.org Subject: You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! From: "received@postcard.org" Content-Type: text/html X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:19:40 -0000 postcards.org

 

You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !

.

You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:

.

Click here to pick up your postcard

.

If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/
and enter your pickup code, which is: d21-sea-sunset

.

(Your postcard will be available for 60 days.)

.

Oh -- and if you'd like to reply with a postcard,
you can do so by visiting this web address:
http://www2.postcards.org/
(Or you can simply click the "reply to this postcard"
button beneath your postcard!)

.

We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do,
please take a moment to send a few yourself!

.

Regards,
1001 Postcards
http://www.postcards.org/postcards/

From johnnyjacob@gmail.com Mon Jun 1 14:42:28 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C77750138 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:42:28 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_JH=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (up: 7177 hrs), (distance 14, link: ethernet/modem), [209.85.220.226] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nW5WjD82c232 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:42:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABAF75009E for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:42:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so7158720fxm.15 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:42:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=9BmrAGgnrOgeT6JTs55Hh/rwfRCECX1k1bXRVp42uMQ=; b=i766X6Y1VERb52xm3v2R3uM1nnIp2IIyqM9bShPwAxMCDQCr7Bm681nQwjqLB6JvBm PcoOvxClMYDc1qyT3wc4SqKduVoMA6AZN1T3cHeaqCmX6erKuSjlOc9/HqqVXZSwVwg6 vNeLClgG5haQf2JuLvIRq08uOsaj80g/GUEOI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=eyBy5oZw5T+77zMfpUihj3J29nS8IcBbZc6vNujOuotWjjYoVIbNdj0ITfr6FyazZO 3l8VsFJjYLTcAto1+EWdbbj1oYLsdeyobhEewb4CAzoBH8dzeXa7ffQhgkjaJoXTodLy R8hJ0PjABaXCC24ESP3M+GEodup+kJ1a7AI1U= Received: by 10.103.241.15 with SMTP id t15mr3265965mur.85.1243867327526; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?164.99.138.87? (ecoprobe-dmz.gns.novell.com [192.31.114.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y6sm1390888mug.40.2009.06.01.07.42.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Request for external dependancy libmapi version update. From: Johnny Jacob To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-7ntvUXo0EIvP8bvrHJGY" Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:11:51 +0530 Message-Id: <1243867311.5178.11.camel@trantor> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.27.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:42:29 -0000 --=-7ntvUXo0EIvP8bvrHJGY Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Requesting to bump the version for the external dependancy libmapi from 0.8.0 to 0.8.2. This is being used by evolution-mapi module. I've attached a patch for jhbuild for the same. Thanks. -- Johnny [johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org] "May you share freely, never taking more than you give " --=-7ntvUXo0EIvP8bvrHJGY Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="jhbuild-libmapi-082-dep-update.patch" Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="jhbuild-libmapi-082-dep-update.patch"; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit commit d9f02babe27a0d357a9e09eef083e3bfbadfc0ab Author: Johnny Jacob Date: Fri May 29 16:18:08 2009 +0530 libmapi and samba4 updates. libmapi updated to 0.8.2 and samba4 to alpha7 Modified modulesets/gnome-external-deps-2.28.modules diff --git a/modulesets/gnome-external-deps-2.28.modules b/modulesets/gnome-external-deps-2.28.modules index 17277c6..347ea33 100644 --- a/modulesets/gnome-external-deps-2.28.modules +++ b/modulesets/gnome-external-deps-2.28.modules @@ -741,8 +741,8 @@ @@ -752,8 +752,8 @@ makeargs="tallocdir='$(srcdir)'" makeinstallargs="install tallocdir='$(srcdir)'"> @@ -761,8 +761,8 @@ @@ -770,8 +770,8 @@ @@ -780,8 +780,8 @@ + module="openchange/libmapi-0.8.2-ROMULUS.tar.gz" version="0.8" + size="1529269" md5sum="b956870860cd786a0793bd89783df185"/> --=-7ntvUXo0EIvP8bvrHJGY-- From bjourne@gmail.com Mon Jun 1 19:29:36 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832527500F5; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:29:36 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.291 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.291 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_DQ=0.077, TW_GV=0.077, TW_JH=0.077, TW_MV=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 10896 hrs), (distance 14, link: (Google 2)), [74.125.92.25] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yRVbf2Xfm1FZ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:29:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE3375009E; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:29:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so4322326qwh.9 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:29:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fZj2g98XPzdiGtHsUgXXMMLTTfOUsveLLH8A2nBLoQc=; b=eO9RVW/1wwCLGcpMbLY9L5RKoteC0ArZc89QMFtnGBSORb2UW3/7gcDbsLBJqKnawx lMWwdgYZYU5SghQ5hSHz/AHE0jqv9062yCaO6YEwxgXXWYHZWJ2We2p37U6IhMWqzRVd AMZrnxiKUZu/fUAS4wl3kHKSKdP30nRODLZ4U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HdjvRmneco5ET3tPA9EyjZ6OAg0gAc/9khkm5hEEDYZNam6A9rjmyQyhQ10Q7GEgmt UTbz2KE1RPjzz8s40M5oDZBsFvtCtjD8p3gm0kNcWaqihUnb9wOw22rhhCat+aJhTOda e+8QXfJqiM6z+49w3aHLR8F+YHvCuFqds1iIE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.74.85 with SMTP id t21mr4203176vcj.105.1243884554895; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <740c3aec0905301512ybf1419bw21e5b4d4cdc45002@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:29:14 +0200 Message-ID: <740c3aec0906011229n383fa4ecj80e076266063943a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: new dependencies in gvfs From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?BJ=F6rn_Lindqvist?= To: Matthias Clasen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: GNOME 2 release team , desktop-devel-list X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:29:36 -0000 Den den 31 maj 2009 04:53 skrev Matthias Clasen = : > 2009/5/30 BJ=F6rn Lindqvist : >> Many of those >> packages are not packaged in Ubuntu Intrepid and at least and some of >> them haven't had any real releases yet. > > It builds fine in Fedora 11... Nice, but let's also get it to build fine in Ubuntu too. >> There are at least two build bugs related to gdu (583704, 582096). > > I'll see if I can get those fixed. Great! Although the bug about hardcoded /usr path seem to be by design which means that I won't be able to build it anyway. :( >> In short, IMHO it is premature to include gdu in jhbuild because the >> project is not batch buildable which is the point of jhbuild. >> >> I also hope that there will more documentation available about gdu >> before it becomes a blessed external dependency because there is very >> little of that available atm, especially why HAL is being replaced and >> what advantages that brings. > > Here are some relevant posts > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/2008-May/011560.html > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2009-April/000140.html > http://blog.fubar.dk/?p=3D105 Thanks. > I don't think it makes much sense to split this library out at the > source level; distros might of course decide to ship it as a separate > gnome-disk-utility-libs package (as we do in Fedora). Unfortunately, not all distros are that wise. Other distros will decide not to split it or split it differently exacerbating the problem with figuring out missing dependencies (e.g. pkg-config complains about missing gnome-disk-utility-libs, what Debian package should you install?). --=20 mvh Bj=F6rn From ak-47@gmx.net Mon Jun 1 20:56:04 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AE375028A for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:56:04 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.98 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 4012 hrs), (distance 19, link: ethernet/modem), [213.165.64.20] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GRzeIat7XOyf for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:55:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D27E8750125 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:55:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jun 2009 20:55:44 -0000 Received: from g1.blanicka25.net (EHLO [10.0.0.5]) [82.208.42.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp056) with SMTP; 01 Jun 2009 22:55:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #726810 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/wKHgub2DwGGVfHvEApLxiedUgiuRumOrwP8HxbM 8kTfxhShv+Tapg Subject: Re: Request for external dependancy libmapi version update. From: Andre Klapper To: Johnny Jacob In-Reply-To: <1243867311.5178.11.camel@trantor> References: <1243867311.5178.11.camel@trantor> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:55:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1243889743.24350.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6899999999999999 Cc: release-team@gnome.org X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:56:04 -0000 Hi Jony, Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 20:11 +0530 schrieb Johnny Jacob: > Requesting to bump the version for the external dependancy libmapi from > 0.8.0 to 0.8.2. This is being used by evolution-mapi module. Please read http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven/ExternalDependencies . andre -- mailto:ak-47@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper From squib@triumphgs.com Mon Jun 1 22:35:41 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A924E7500CF for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:35:41 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.901 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, L_P0F_UNKN=0.8, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: UNKNOWN [16384:96:1:48:M1460,N,N,S:Q0:?:?], (link: ethernet/modem), [93.32.171.242] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k84wZhrUUl43 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:35:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from xrgxtgw.fastwebnet.it (93-32-171-242.ip34.fastwebnet.it [93.32.171.242]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19C167500B4 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:35:25 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----5D2247BD2981615720FCE20A3" Subject: NYC Ghost Investigators Juxst A Call Away From: Murguia MIME-Version: 1.0 To: release-team@gnome.org Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:35:24 +0000 X-Mailer: PHP v5.2.8 Message-ID: <4CA0DD0D41CA24D96E6501364F47E3A474EB3D@triumphgs.com> X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:35:41 -0000 ------5D2247BD2981615720FCE20A3 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="graciousness.rtf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 e1xydGYxXGFuc2lcYW5zaWNwZzEyNTJcZGVmZjBcZGVmbGFuZzEwMzN7XGZvbnR0Ymx7XGYwXGZu aWxcZmNoYXJzZXQwIENhbGlicmk7fX0NCntcY29sb3J0YmwgO1xyZWQwXGdyZWVuMFxibHVlMjU1 O30NCntcKlxnZW5lcmF0b3IgTXNmdGVkaXQgNS40MS4yMS4yNTA5O31cdmlld2tpbmQ0XHVjMVxw YXJkXHNhMjAwXHNsMjc2XHNsbXVsdDFcbGFuZzlcZjBcZnMyMntcZmllbGR7XCpcZmxkaW5zdHtI WVBFUkxJTksgImh0dHA6Ly81NS0xMS5jbiJ9fXtcZmxkcnNsdHtcdWxcY2YxIGh0dHA6Ly81NS0x MS5jbn19fVxmMFxmczIyICAtIGJ1eSB2aWFncmEsIGNpYWxpcywgbGV2aXRyYSBhbmQgb3RoZXIg bWVkc1xwYXINCn0= ------5D2247BD2981615720FCE20A3-- From admin@mail.mectron.it Tue Jun 2 17:11:38 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A5375009D for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:11:38 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.753 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.753 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, L_P0F_Unix=-1, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0.56, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, URIBL_SC_SURBL=0.474] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: FreeBSD 6.x (1) (up: 489 hrs), (distance 20, link: ethernet/modem), [88.37.145.76] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZJb7sZfGdAr for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:11:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mectron.it (host76-145-static.37-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it [88.37.145.76]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F527500AD for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:11:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mail.mectron.it (Postfix, from userid 501) id F070D1BE8EE9; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:15:28 +0200 (CEST) To: release-team@gnome.org Subject: You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! From: received@postcard.org Content-Type: text/html Message-Id: <20090602151730.F070D1BE8EE9@mail.mectron.it> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:15:28 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:11:38 -0000 postcards.org

 

You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !

.

You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:

.

Click here to pick up your postcard

.

If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/
and enter your pickup code, which is: d21-sea-sunset

.

(Your postcard will be available for 60 days.)

.

Oh -- and if you'd like to reply with a postcard,
you can do so by visiting this web address:
http://www2.postcards.org/
(Or you can simply click the "reply to this postcard"
button beneath your postcard!)

.

We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do,
please take a moment to send a few yourself!

.

Regards,
1001 Postcards
http://www.postcards.org/postcards/

From pchen@gnome.org Wed Jun 3 10:03:34 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FFF750068; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:03:34 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) (NAT!) (up: 10767 hrs), (distance 13, link: GPRS, T1, FreeS/WAN), [137.65.250.26] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQgDV1lcF9Ad; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:03:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from victor.provo.novell.com (victor.provo.novell.com [137.65.250.26]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E488075008E; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:03:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (prv-ext-foundry1.gns.novell.com [137.65.251.240]) by victor.provo.novell.com with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:03:04 -0600 Subject: Request for upgrading the minimum sqlite version to the latest stable version 3.6.x From: Chenthill To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:27:42 +0530 Message-Id: <1244023062.6371.38.camel@linux-adcj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.27.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "evolution-hackers@gnome.org" , "desktop-devel-list@gnome.org" X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:03:35 -0000 Hi, We (evolution team) would like to request upgrading the minimum required version for sqlite to 3.6.x from 3.5.9 for the following reasons, 1) Api change in xCheckReservedLock method. (reference - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575084 ) 2) Most of the distributions have sqlite 3.6 Am adding ddl in CC to see if any other application has any issues with the same. Thanks, Chenthill. From pchenthill@novell.com Wed Jun 3 10:43:45 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF5C75007D; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:43:45 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.571 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.571 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=2.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Novell Netware 6 SP3, (distance 13, link: unknown-1390), [137.65.248.127] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fRmUQd4jae7W; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:43:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lucius.provo.novell.com (lucius.provo.novell.com [137.65.248.127]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F12750068; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:43:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from INET-PRV1-MTA by lucius.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:43:21 -0600 Message-Id: <4A25FF67020000DE00064147@lucius.provo.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.0 Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:43:19 -0600 From: "P Chenthill" To: Subject: Re: Request for upgrading the minimum sqlite version to the latest stable version 3.6.x Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: evolution-hackers@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:43:45 -0000 To be more specific 3.6.x =3D 3.6.14.2 (latest stable version) would be better unless there is a reason not to have it as a minimum version. Thanks, Chenthill. On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 15:27 +0530, Chenthill wrote: > Hi, > We (evolution team) would like to request upgrading the minimum > required version for sqlite to 3.6.x from 3.5.9 for the following > reasons, >=20 > 1) Api change in xCheckReservedLock method. (reference - > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D575084 ) > 2) Most of the distributions have sqlite 3.6 >=20 > Am adding ddl in CC to see if any other application has any issues with = the same. >=20 > Thanks, Chenthill. From vuntz@gnome.org Thu Jun 4 15:11:27 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D32975010F; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:11:27 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_BW=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) (up: 2170 hrs), (distance 22, link: ethernet/modem), [82.240.102.222] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N+nYkomABvAv; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:11:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.240.102.222]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60D37500CB; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:11:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3C8E112707; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:11:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:11:11 +0200 From: Vincent Untz To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, gnome-i18n@gnome.org, release-team@gnome.org Subject: gnome-{desktop,menus,panel,session}, libgweather and libwnck branched for 2.26 Message-ID: <20090604151111.GF10754@vuntz.net> Mail-Followup-To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, gnome-i18n@gnome.org, release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:11:28 -0000 Hi all, I just branched gnome-{desktop,menus,panel,session}, libgweather and libwnck for 2.26, with the usual gnome-2-26 name. Note to translators: the gnome-panel branch doesn't contain the string freeze break. I also had to mark some strings as fuzzy to pass the post-commit check for po files. This has been done for: + gnome-panel: bn, ku (the strings don't exist anymore in the code, though) + libwnck: ne Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From shopie@localhost.genealogy-help.co.uk Tue Jun 9 20:27:47 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE33A750209 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:27:47 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 2.216 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.216 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.097, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0.56, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.4-2.6 (up: 851 hrs), (distance 21, link: ethernet/modem), [217.174.240.154] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LHlJgcOEuWiD for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:27:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.genealogy-help.co.uk (server217-174-240-154.live-servers.net [217.174.240.154]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889117501E5 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:27:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: by localhost.genealogy-help.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1066) id 6A1F56005A; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:14:19 +0100 (BST) To: release-team@gnome.org Subject: You've received A Hallmark E-Card! From: hallmark.com Content-Type: text/html Message-Id: <20090609201419.6A1F56005A@localhost.genealogy-help.co.uk> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:14:19 +0100 (BST) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:27:48 -0000
Hallmark.comShop OnlineHallmark MagazineE-Cards & MoreAt Gold Crown
      You have recieved A Hallmark E-Card.
 
  Hello!

You have recieved a Hallmark E-Card.

To see it, click here,

There's something special about that E-Card feeling. We invite you to make a friend's day and send one.

Hope to see you soon,
Your friends at Hallmark

Your privacy is our priority. Click the "Privacy and Security" link at the bottom of this E-mail to view our policy. 		 
 
Hallmark.com | Privacy & Security | Customer Service | Store Locator
From accounts@gnome.org Fri Jun 12 00:00:15 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF61A7500A9 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:15 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4nooAzurLRsH for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from window.gnome.org (window-back [172.31.1.13]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D9B7500CB for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from window.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by window.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3C223844B for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: GNOME 2.27.3 unstable tarballs due From: Release Team To: release-team@gnome.org Message-Id: <20090612000005.DF3C223844B@window.gnome.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:05 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:16 -0000 Hello all, Tarballs are due on 2009-06-15 before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 2.27.3 unstable release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. Modules which were proposed for inclusion should try to follow the unstable schedule so everyone can test them. Please make sure that your tarballs will be uploaded before Monday 23:59 UTC: tarballs uploaded later than that will probably be too late to get in 2.27.3. If you are not able to make a tarball before this deadline or if you think you'll be late, please send a mail to the release team and we'll find someone to roll the tarball for you! For more information about 2.27, the full schedule, the official module lists and the proposed module lists, please see our colorful 2.27 page: http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see: http://live.gnome.org/Schedule Thanks, From vuntz@gnome.org Fri Jun 12 16:33:10 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61764750140 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:33:10 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_BG=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) (up: 2653 hrs), (distance 21, link: ethernet/modem), [82.240.102.222] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id owzOAIESqYr9 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:33:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.240.102.222]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0B0750127 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:32:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 837381126FF; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:32:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:32:50 +0200 From: Vincent Untz To: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Meeting minutes (May 10th) Message-ID: <20090612163250.GR10754@vuntz.net> Mail-Followup-To: release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:33:10 -0000 Wow, I didn't realize I was so late for the minutes. Apologies for this. The short summary: fredp and lucasr have action items :-) Vincent ========================= Attendance ========== Present: Andre Klapper (andre) Frederic Crozat (fcrozat) Frederic Peters (fpeters) Karsten Bräckelmann (guenther) Lucas Rocha (lucasr) Matthias Clasen (mclasen) Vincent Untz (vuntz) -- taking minutes Missing: Kjartan Maraas (kmaraas) Olav Vitters (bkor) Agenda ====== + release team membership changes + looking back at the 2.26 cycle + release assignments + platform cleanup status + 3.0 roadmapping ACTIONS ======= Andre: + announce libglade deprecation (DONE) FrédéricP: + discuss with Gustavo a plan for gnome-python and deprecated part of the platform + mail binding maintainers with potential options to remove deprecated API (separate module, --disable-deprecated, deprecating warning at runtime, mentions in release announcements) Lucas: + setup initial wiki page for 3.0 roadmap + maybe announce the roadmap process change for 2.28 & 3.0 Release Team membership changes =============================== Everybody is happy to continue his share of work in the release team for the next cycle. Looking back at the 2.26 cycle ============================== There were mainly two things: + the session saving got in late. Maintainers were guilty there. + module inclusion decision coming too late during the cycle - this was initially a comment from Bastien - andre mentions this has been changed for 2.29 already and we should probably keep the change - discussion on why we take so long: we're waiting for feedback and improvements in the modules - two potential solutions to make the decision process a bit easier: * really make sure a module gets proposed when it's ready (modulo the integration with other modules) * open the module proposal period earlier (between .90 and .92), and then announce the decision between .1 and .3 - lucasr notes that it's a good thing to have one announcement with all decisions, instead of fragmented decisions where we'd accept/reject a module from time to time Release assignments =================== May 20 2.26.2 vuntz May 27 2.27.2 lucasr Jun 17 2.27.3 fcrozat Jun 29 2.26.3 lucasr Jul 15 2.27.4 fredp Jul 29 2.27.5 vuntz Aug 12 2.27.90 fcrozat Aug 26 2.27.91 fredp Sep 09 2.27.92 vuntz Matthias missed the part where we assigned release and mentioned he could do one if someone wants to get rid of one. Platform cleanup status ======================= Andre sent a mail abut this: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2009-May/msg00174.html One issue is the session management: + people copy EggSmClient to get rid of libgnome + ideally, GTK+ bug 79285 would get fixed + mclasen notes that the GTK+ part depends on dbus support in glib + this should be ready for 3.0 (so early 2.29) Another issue is deprecation in bindings: gnomeprint and gnome-vfs are deprecated in the platform but still in the python and mono bindings. Gustavo proposed a solution for gnome-python: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2009-April/msg00437.html It appears creating a separate module is not his prefered solution. fredp mentions the DeprecationWarning warning support in python, and the option of a --disable-deprecated-modules configure flag. We agree to officially deprecate libglade. 3.0 roadmapping =============== Lucas proposes to create a simple process based on topics/goals, where we'd have a wiki page with milestones for each topic/goal. There wouldn't be a roadmap call for each module, so we can focus on the big picture. This would bring more visibility and make it easier to check the status. Some examples: + new website could be part of the marketing goal + mallard could be part of "revamp help system" goal People agreed on the idea, and to focus on this, we drop the current roadmap process for 2.28 and 3.0. Next meeting ============ Hopefully, a GUADEC meeting will be possible. A meeting is already scheduled for end of July for the module decisions, but having most work done during GUADEC would probably be a good thing. Already proposed agenda items for next meeting: + Discuss whether to open call for new modules for 2.29 around 2.27.90 -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From vuntz@gnome.org Fri Jun 12 16:42:54 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD1675011C for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:42:54 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) (up: 2653 hrs), (distance 21, link: ethernet/modem), [82.240.102.222] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8TP1ILjVqrKi for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:42:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.240.102.222]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7A1750127 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:42:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B84631126FF; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:42:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:42:36 +0200 From: Vincent Untz To: Javi Subject: Re: "Gnomifiers" page Message-ID: <20090612164236.GS10754@vuntz.net> Mail-Followup-To: Javi , release-team@gnome.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: release-team@gnome.org X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:42:55 -0000 Hi Javi, Le jeudi 28 mai 2009, à 17:32 +0200, Javi a écrit : > Hello release team, > > After a conversation with Andre Kappler in the IRC, we've created this > page: http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/Gnomifiers > > The objective is: > "find good software and to contact their developers to suggest them to > became part of GNOME." > as the page said > > Hope it be useful and any idea/suggestion is very welcome ;) This is a good idea! One thing that was discussed at FOSDEM is that we don't need to make the apps "official" GNOME apps to promote them. Eg, we could well put pitivi on the front page of www.gnome.org to say how much it's rocking. Maybe it'd be worth telling the developers that if they don't want to be part of official GNOME, they are still part of the GNOME world and we'd love to be able to work with them on promotion. (pretty sure Lucas has more ideas on this topic) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From javierjc1982@gmail.com Fri Jun 12 21:07:25 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7565C750138; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:07:25 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (up: 1322 hrs), (distance 15, link: ethernet/modem), [209.85.218.207] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fGfB0P-aGuLx; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:07:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-bw0-f207.google.com (mail-bw0-f207.google.com [209.85.218.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED121750159; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:07:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2127271bwz.15 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:07:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CN2NghylJY3/F9Q+CrI/DvNRFkjX7Rw7hw9XnUtg30I=; b=UznMyxRDCMqwsjovZPjqY1QAcstHMOBYJjeJOdG38hydZw24Bm/MjrJA4l7y9uMFDi 00LzysMoQGlcfZYNnNEf4fv3YfWXte70pXP6WiZkYhUsz0gJd5XsEsQ+09cm+oyw1E7/ X+cBrIBoQOXc5yBU7KBUFqCNIojBwLySL04Nw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rbk5K7trnYnKA+qeMN/cpP/NrD6nfKhU5f7j+RUhR4WgTIDeVNSYlfz+B0sZZGXDYJ Jv1EXomdSsawGcCyOrKBwB9bCDiVSifkLMuDbVHyde0iT23Gg8dBNUm/4Vcuw4LbopQy cTNWvcA2I+fRf8IpvmHC9c2srf38cPuwj08lA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.105.72 with SMTP id s8mr3083660fao.9.1244840826074; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:07:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090612164236.GS10754@vuntz.net> References: <20090612164236.GS10754@vuntz.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:07:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "Gnomifiers" page From: Javi To: vuntz@gnome.org, release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:07:25 -0000 2009/6/12 Vincent Untz : > Hi Javi, > Hello! > > This is a good idea! One thing that was discussed at FOSDEM is that we > don't need to make the apps "official" GNOME apps to promote them. Eg, > we could well put pitivi on the front page of www.gnome.org to say how > much it's rocking. > Yes, I agree. See the KDE project: amarok isn't a KDE project but KDE promotes it a lot. I think that promote great apps that use Gnome technologies is always good. > Maybe it'd be worth telling the developers that if they don't want to be > part of official GNOME, they are still part of the GNOME world and we'd > love to be able to work with them on promotion. > > (pretty sure Lucas has more ideas on this topic) > Is there a page with a list of "benefits" of became a Gnome official application? Thus, we could show that page to application developers if they wanted more information. Best regards, --=20 Javier Jard=C3=B3n Cabezas From accounts@gnome.org Sun Jun 14 00:00:16 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF41C7500E5 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:00:16 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DvTYPChiyIpU for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:00:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from window.gnome.org (window-back [172.31.1.13]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B41750086 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:00:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from window.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by window.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665312383BD for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: GNOME 2.27.3 unstable release From: Release Team To: release-team@gnome.org Message-Id: <20090614000007.665312383BD@window.gnome.org> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:00:07 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:00:17 -0000 Hello all, GNOME 2.27.3 unstable release For more information about 2.27, the full schedule, the official module lists and the proposed module lists, please see our colorful 2.27 page: http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see: http://live.gnome.org/Schedule Thanks, From lucasr.at.mundo@gmail.com Sun Jun 14 18:22:58 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F98B7500C2 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:22:58 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (up: 10497 hrs), (distance 13, link: ethernet/modem), [209.85.221.171] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hzKaCpnApj6V for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:22:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (mail-qy0-f171.google.com [209.85.221.171]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D868E7501BE for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:22:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so2408368qyk.13 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:22:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3GwsPgEHfnxj16gk9v/k3VFVJ2Cv8Vc2zm6S7p5jMks=; b=YKWu2YacsftTUMI6ubASbSuezoQta4hmuHxFJmaM1hX6i5gSiNOwRryrng2SGElNLN B9kybQJukj+1Ve+uWEbvGAATSsITo8uwyrs4R4rtDEXBeSkeReg1v0DxTbjhhxD051rk 4A0+K7GuDbosvsOhOoWYrtiBub1PMOdvrq/RY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=T9zeoJ0vAJ2+Bx/WGduerbwwtW/xUUrnwRr0Q+Qfo5x5+GhYS+i/HOjGMrnPvDFDCa U4KOg0swlmcRki6i3YpTEdHG+hHhARSJCVFQRBMSBOA5UlSlHTYyEhrQ96zBWWt2Qeh2 I0Ew/RhsEcBb+FtdApyz0GDTSn5/l87bL1khg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lucasr.at.mundo@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.46.20 with SMTP id h20mr4189751vcf.78.1245003762724; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:22:42 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 386ea6f686cfd5f7 Message-ID: <31a62e6f0906141122n507d4ae8iaa8c6ffd8bbc4c10@mail.gmail.com> Subject: GNOME 3.0 Roadmap - Release Management From: Lucas Rocha To: GNOME 2 release team Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:22:58 -0000 Hi all, I'm working on the roadmap for GNOME 3.0 now. The idea is to have a more concrete set of goals for 3.0 and bring more clarity and transparency to the 3.0 general plans. Instead of doing a current per-module roadmapping process, I'm trying to use a more topic-based approach. I think "Release Management" could be one of those topics. This could be a nice way to plan the release management changes we want to get done by 3.0. So, here's the information I'm looking for: 1. Summarize in one sentence/paragraph the goal(s) for Release Management in GNOME 3.0 2. What are the goals for Release Management in GNOME 3.0? Some general guidelines: - For 2, I'm expeting a simple bullet list; - The items should be as concise and concrete as possible; - Ideally, the goals listed here should have a good level of feasibility. Try to avoid "blue sky" type of ideas with no people actually backing them; - Try to split those in two milestones: 2.28 and 2.30; - It would be nice to have the roadmap by June 19. We can include our ideas for re-scoping the desktop module set, app certification process, etc. Other ideas? Anyway, I think it would be a good exercise for us to try to come up with a concrete plan for 3.0. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers! --lucasr From danw@gnome.org Tue Jun 16 15:55:53 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DB875007B for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:55:53 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, L_P0F_Unix=-1] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: NetBSD 3.0 (DF), (distance 16, link: ethernet/modem), [69.25.196.35] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bYE+r5dT7YEa for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:55:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mysterion.org (mysterion.org [69.25.196.35]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DB7750024 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:55:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from desktop.home.mysterion.org (c-76-20-224-113.hsd1.ga.comcast.net [76.20.224.113]) by mysterion.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2F465802AE for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:55:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A37C072.3010108@gnome.org> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:55:30 -0400 From: Dan Winship User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gnome Release Team Subject: libsoup 2.27.something Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:55:53 -0000 I had network problems yesterday so I couldn't make a tarball until today. If you've already started doing the 2.27.3 release, feel free to just ignore this tarball. (Fedora and Ubuntu will both have already released packages of it before you even announce 2.27.3 anyway, so it doesn't matter to me whether or not it's "officially" in...) Um, also, it's called libsoup 2.27.2 instead of .3, because I wasn't paying attention. (I was on vacation when 2.27.2 went out, so I never released a tarball for that, and so today I saw that the last release was 2.27.1, so I tagged this 2.27.2...) -- Dan From fcrozat@mandriva.com Wed Jun 17 09:25:45 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D507A7500E8; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:25:45 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) (up: 4545 hrs), (distance 22, link: ethernet/modem), [212.85.150.166] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dpiaGDf6FuX; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:25:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mandriva.com (mx1.moondrake.net [212.85.150.166]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C607500CD; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:25:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mx1.mandriva.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 268F2274016; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:25:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Virus: No Received: from office-abk.mandriva.com (office-abk.mandriva.com [84.55.162.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028AF274014; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:25:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.216] (fw2.mandriva.com [192.168.2.3]) by office-abk.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22903829B5; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:31:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: libsoup 2.27.something From: Frederic Crozat To: release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <4A37C072.3010108@gnome.org> References: <4A37C072.3010108@gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Organization: Mandriva Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:25:23 +0200 Message-Id: <1245230724.13861.14.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1.1-1mdv2009.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Dan Winship X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:25:46 -0000 Le mardi 16 juin 2009 à 11:55 -0400, Dan Winship a écrit : > I had network problems yesterday so I couldn't make a tarball until > today. If you've already started doing the 2.27.3 release, feel free to > just ignore this tarball. (Fedora and Ubuntu will both have already > released packages of it before you even announce 2.27.3 anyway, so it > doesn't matter to me whether or not it's "officially" in...) > > Um, also, it's called libsoup 2.27.2 instead of .3, because I wasn't > paying attention. (I was on vacation when 2.27.2 went out, so I never > released a tarball for that, and so today I saw that the last release > was 2.27.1, so I tagged this 2.27.2...) Thanks for the notice, I'll grab it for 2.27.3. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From sragavan@novell.com Wed Jun 17 18:19:50 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89CA75007D for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:19:50 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.668 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.668 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=1.931, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) (NAT!) (up: 11628 hrs), (distance 13, link: GPRS, T1, FreeS/WAN), [137.65.250.26] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBrpKc2Mk0Bj for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:19:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from victor.provo.novell.com (victor.provo.novell.com [137.65.250.26]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1402A750024 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:19:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.108] (prv-ext-foundry1.gns.novell.com [137.65.251.240]) by victor.provo.novell.com with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:19:30 -0600 Subject: Evolution thoughts for GNOME 3.0 From: Srinivasa Ragavan To: release-team Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:50:41 +0530 Message-Id: <1245262842.5451.35.camel@linux-900d> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matthew Barnes , chen X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:19:50 -0000 Guys, I just wanted to start this once Mathew Barnes posts his status for Kill Bonobo branch (Bonobo deprecation). Lemme start right away, with my thought/proposal. I wanted to do the following. - Continue Evolution 2.26 as stable series till 3.0 comes out. - Treat Evolution 2.28 as a intermediate milestone for GNOME/Evolution 3.0 - Continue releasing Evolution 2.26.x (Evolution 2.26.5/6/7...) series as stable releases for GNOME 2.28.1/2/3 instead of releasing Evolution 2.28.1/2/3. Its mainly this and the reasons to follow. I expect lot of rewrites, dbus port merge, bonobo deprecation (kill bonobo merge). etc. I don't think, Evolution 2.28 can be stable, unless I postpone these tasks which might merge late in 2.28 cycle to really 2.29.x. But postponing merges at times, doesn't really mean that it will finish in time, when the targets are relaxed/moved to 2.29.x I really wanted to take up these merges even though they are late, and go ahead for a stable 3.0. The main difference it makes is that, I can get over these tasks asap with out looking for a interim-stability series and aim good for a stable Evolution for GNOME 3.0. It gives a good window IMHO. Thoughts on this? Secondly, Evolution uses GNOME canvas in and around every UI. I wanted to know the future direction/migration path, haven't seen one before. Its gonna be another painful task like deprecating bonobo with in Evolution :/. I would like to vote against this, if there is a possibility. -Srini. From mbarnes@redhat.com Wed Jun 17 20:05:45 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6737A7500B6 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:05:45 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.008 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.008 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=1.591, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (NAT!) (up: 992 hrs), (distance 13, link: GPRS, T1, FreeS/WAN), [66.187.237.31] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ny4rBnAGbMzw for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:05:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A0D750085 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:05:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5HK5TuW007225; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:05:29 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5HK5SWO016977; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:05:28 -0400 Received: from [10.11.12.159] (vpn-12-159.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.159]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5HK5R7R027291; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:05:27 -0400 Subject: Re: Evolution thoughts for GNOME 3.0 From: Matthew Barnes To: release-team In-Reply-To: <1245262842.5451.35.camel@linux-900d> References: <1245262842.5451.35.camel@linux-900d> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0AG4CkRtkzt6CZ/4Hn7T" Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:05:27 -0400 Message-Id: <1245269127.7807.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.27.26 Cc: Srinivasa Ragavan , chen X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:05:45 -0000 --=-0AG4CkRtkzt6CZ/4Hn7T Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 23:50 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > I expect lot of rewrites, dbus port merge, bonobo deprecation (kill > bonobo merge). etc. I don't think, Evolution 2.28 can be stable, unless > I postpone these tasks which might merge late in 2.28 cycle to really > 2.29.x. But postponing merges at times, doesn't really mean that it will > finish in time, when the targets are relaxed/moved to 2.29.x I really > wanted to take up these merges even though they are late, and go ahead > for a stable 3.0. The main difference it makes is that, I can get over > these tasks asap with out looking for a interim-stability series and aim > good for a stable Evolution for GNOME 3.0. It gives a good window IMHO. I'll add that with every major branch merge we have to allow sufficient time to clean up the inevitable mess. It's really hard to do this under a string and UI freeze, or even the announcement period. That leaves us with a relatively short time window per six-month cycle to get these things in. That's why, for example, I set 2.27.3 as a hard deadline for merging the Bonobo removal in time for 2.28. If I miss that, which I will, we punt to 2.29.1. As things stand, we simply have more merges lined up than we have merge windows before GNOME 3. So we need to destabilize things for a bit longer than usual in order to meet all our 3.0 milestones in time. Matthew Barnes --=-0AG4CkRtkzt6CZ/4Hn7T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAko5TIMACgkQwxelusg+xO0D7wCfWuQ4042kjZrSgSB65Ub4zfgm fjUAoLCP2wpxuND6A2CnaK7OGL1m/TOn =NOcw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0AG4CkRtkzt6CZ/4Hn7T-- From ak-47@gmx.net Thu Jun 18 00:21:51 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B76E7500C2 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:21:51 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.903 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, TW_BG=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 4714 hrs), (distance 19, link: ethernet/modem), [213.165.64.20] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9GDn0-0wvH3 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:21:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB80F75006C for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:21:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2009 00:21:30 -0000 Received: from g1.blanicka25.net (EHLO [10.0.0.6]) [82.208.42.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 18 Jun 2009 02:21:30 +0200 X-Authenticated: #726810 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ZsVNtcQlZDUbipWufnog1cQfkIJQS4HWaM2VPeI YIsrEB2fJT9WYD Subject: Re: Evolution thoughts for GNOME 3.0 From: Andre Klapper To: Srinivasa Ragavan In-Reply-To: <1245262842.5451.35.camel@linux-900d> References: <1245262842.5451.35.camel@linux-900d> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:21:28 +0200 Message-Id: <1245284488.5545.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.55 Cc: release-team , chen , Matthew Barnes X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:21:51 -0000 Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 23:50 +0530 schrieb Srinivasa Ragavan: > - Continue Evolution 2.26 as stable series till 3.0 comes out. > - Treat Evolution 2.28 as a intermediate milestone for GNOME/Evolution > 3.0 > - Continue releasing Evolution 2.26.x (Evolution 2.26.5/6/7...) series > as stable releases for GNOME 2.28.1/2/3 instead of releasing Evolution > 2.28.1/2/3. You might call the stable Evolution releases "2.28.x" but create them from the gnome-2-26 branch. On the other hand that is confusing if you were up to continue calling the unstable series for 3.0 "2.27.x". So we ship e.g. Evolution 2.26.6/.7 for GNOME 2.28.1/.2? r-t: Having GNOME releases in mind I wonder which release suite an Evolution 2.27.13 release would be part of in the last weeks of GNOME 2.27.x - I don't think we should include a 2.27.13 Evolution release in e.g. GNOME 2.27.92. People expect components of a release candidate (two weeks before a major release) to be way more stable than Evolution 2.27.13 at that time (6 months before a major release). So how to ensure testing of the continued unstable branch in the last weeks before 2.28.0? r-t could think of an additional 2.29.0 release (shipping all modules that have branched for gnome-3-0 already before 2.28 release) maybe one week before 2.28.0? > I expect lot of rewrites, dbus port merge, bonobo deprecation (kill > bonobo merge). etc. I don't think, Evolution 2.28 can be stable, unless > I postpone these tasks which might merge late in 2.28 cycle to really > 2.29.x. [...] > Thoughts on this? After some bad experiences with kill-summary bugs in 2.24.x I agree with your proposal to continue 2.27.x for the next 9 months and kind of drop 2.28.x. > Secondly, Evolution uses GNOME canvas in and around every UI. I wanted > to know the future direction/migration path, haven't seen one before. > Its gonna be another painful task like deprecating bonobo with in > Evolution :/. I would like to vote against this, if there is a > possibility. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571742 I still have not found out when and why libgnomecanvas was deprecated by the release-team. Maybe someone remembers? According to http://www.gnome.org/~fpeters/299.html Evolution, planner and gthumb use libgnomecanvas. andre -- mailto:ak-47@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper From sragavan@novell.com Thu Jun 18 02:38:44 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6017500C2 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:38:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.422 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.422 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_NONE=0.1, TW_BG=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (up: 22 hrs), (distance 22, link: ethernet/modem), [123.237.139.125] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxENjJorolIB for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:38:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux-900d.site (unknown [123.237.139.125]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D490975006C for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:38:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: by linux-900d.site (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 61DAFACAAF; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:09:39 +0530 (IST) Subject: Re: Evolution thoughts for GNOME 3.0 From: Srinivasa Ragavan To: Andre Klapper In-Reply-To: <1245284488.5545.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1245262842.5451.35.camel@linux-900d> <1245284488.5545.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:09:38 +0530 Message-Id: <1245292778.5451.45.camel@linux-900d> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Cc: release-team , chen , Matthew Barnes X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:38:45 -0000 On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 02:21 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 23:50 +0530 schrieb Srinivasa Ragavan: > > - Continue Evolution 2.26 as stable series till 3.0 comes out. > > - Treat Evolution 2.28 as a intermediate milestone for GNOME/Evolution > > 3.0 > > - Continue releasing Evolution 2.26.x (Evolution 2.26.5/6/7...) series > > as stable releases for GNOME 2.28.1/2/3 instead of releasing Evolution > > 2.28.1/2/3. > > You might call the stable Evolution releases "2.28.x" but create them > from the gnome-2-26 branch. On the other hand that is confusing if you > were up to continue calling the unstable series for 3.0 "2.27.x". Once we enter 2.29.x schedule, we 'll name it accordingly. > So we ship e.g. Evolution 2.26.6/.7 for GNOME 2.28.1/.2? Sure. > > > r-t: Having GNOME releases in mind I wonder which release suite an > Evolution 2.27.13 release would be part of in the last weeks of GNOME > 2.27.x - I don't think we should include a 2.27.13 Evolution release in > e.g. GNOME 2.27.92. People expect components of a release candidate (two > weeks before a major release) to be way more stable than Evolution > 2.27.13 at that time (6 months before a major release). > So how to ensure testing of the continued unstable branch in the last > weeks before 2.28.0? Nice point. I think we can afford the ~two week gap. Or we can have both stable (2.26.x) & unstable (2.27.x) tarballs part of the release. Let people choose what they want to play with and ship on. > r-t could think of an additional 2.29.0 release (shipping all modules > that have branched for gnome-3-0 already before 2.28 release) maybe one > week before 2.28.0? Sounds great. > > > I expect lot of rewrites, dbus port merge, bonobo deprecation (kill > > bonobo merge). etc. I don't think, Evolution 2.28 can be stable, unless > > I postpone these tasks which might merge late in 2.28 cycle to really > > 2.29.x. > [...] > > Thoughts on this? > > After some bad experiences with kill-summary bugs in 2.24.x I agree with > your proposal to continue 2.27.x for the next 9 months and kind of drop > 2.28.x. Precisely, you got it. I really want to avoid another disk summary like mess up. Thanks Andre for the understanding :-) > > > Secondly, Evolution uses GNOME canvas in and around every UI. I wanted > > to know the future direction/migration path, haven't seen one before. > > Its gonna be another painful task like deprecating bonobo with in > > Evolution :/. I would like to vote against this, if there is a > > possibility. > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571742 > > I still have not found out when and why libgnomecanvas was deprecated by > the release-team. Maybe someone remembers? > > According to http://www.gnome.org/~fpeters/299.html Evolution, planner > and gthumb use libgnomecanvas. I really need the migration path/future plans for this. It will be one thing, that touches every bit of Evolution. Message list, calendar view, addressbook etc.. everything uses GNOME Canvas. I would be happy to continue with gnome-canvas, if possible. -Srini From fcrozat@mandriva.com Thu Jun 18 12:51:46 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DC675009E for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:51:46 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.368 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.368 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_GT=0.077, TW_JH=0.077, TW_TK=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) (up: 4820 hrs), (distance 22, link: ethernet/modem), [212.85.150.166] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wASHdtB6MPTE for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:51:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mandriva.com (mx1.moondrake.net [212.85.150.166]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A72F7500A7 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:51:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mx1.mandriva.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 23D8227400C; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:51:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Virus: No Received: from office-abk.mandriva.com (office-abk.mandriva.com [84.55.162.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B44274007 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:51:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.216] (fw2.mandriva.com [192.168.2.3]) by office-abk.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DFA829B9 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:57:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Status of GNOME 2.27.3, from the building side From: Frederic Crozat To: release-team Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Mandriva Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:51:24 +0200 Message-Id: <1245329484.13367.42.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1.1-1mdv2009.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:51:46 -0000 Hi guys, I've just released GNOME 2.27.3 and for those of you who didn't hang on IRC when I was fighting with building the entire stack and I must say I'm extremely disappointed by all the issues I found in the process, mostly because maintainers are not doing correctly their jobs when they are releasing tarballs (sorry for the rant): - a lot of build dependency were missing in jhbuild modulesets : - webkit had a missing dependency on libsoup - pixman was building with gtk enabled, pulling system gtk in the process - libcanberra was built before gtk, causing all programs depending on libcanberra to fail to build, because they need libcanberra-gtk - gnome-desktop-sharp has a missing dep on gnome-sharp - telepathy-farsight had a hard dependency on gst-python ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22345 ) - no clutter-gtk dep on libchampain - some stable module are not building with current stack : - gtkmm : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586254 ) - seahorse-plugins depends on a "gecko" epiphany - webkit 1.1.10 wasn't released in time, preventing epiphany build - dl.sourceforge.net being overloaded (it should have been using prdownloads.sourceforge.net to use SF mirrors, fixed now) - some released tarballs are not buildable, because they rely on unreleased external dependencies (gnome-games 2.27.3) Thanks to Fred Peters who helped me by fixing a lot of issues in modulesets when I was discovering them. How can we get maintainers to improve what they are released so it is not up to release team to fix those issues ? -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From honlap@szig.sopron.hu Fri Jun 19 11:18:06 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8797500F4 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:18:06 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.483 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.483 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.097, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0.56, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) (NAT!) (up: 3594 hrs), (distance 23, link: GPRS, T1, FreeS/WAN), [195.199.197.189] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yOg78SNTKScV for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from szerver5.szechenyi-sopron.sulinet.hu (szerver5.szechenyi-sopron.sulinet.hu [195.199.197.189]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7842B75006E for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:17:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: by szerver5.szechenyi-sopron.sulinet.hu (Postfix, from userid 1012) id C55B81D02BB; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:41:24 +0200 (CEST) To: release-team@gnome.org Subject: You've received A Hallmark E-Card! From: hallmark.com Content-Type: text/html Message-Id: <20090619104124.C55B81D02BB@szerver5.szechenyi-sopron.sulinet.hu> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:41:24 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:18:06 -0000
Hallmark.comShop OnlineHallmark MagazineE-Cards & MoreAt Gold Crown
      You have recieved A Hallmark E-Card.
 
  Hello!

You have recieved a Hallmark E-Card.

To see it, click here,

There's something special about that E-Card feeling. We invite you to make a friend's day and send one.

Hope to see you soon,
Your friends at Hallmark

Your privacy is our priority. Click the "Privacy and Security" link at the bottom of this E-mail to view our policy. 		 
 
Hallmark.com | Privacy & Security | Customer Service | Store Locator
From vizsga@auto-kanizsa.hu Fri Jun 19 11:56:55 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A5E7500F4 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:56:55 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.483 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.483 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.097, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0.56, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.4-2.6 (up: 4503 hrs), (distance 25, link: pppoe (DSL)), [195.228.227.98] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V5J6x38zetW5 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:56:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auto-kanizsa.hu (mail.auto-kanizsa.hu [195.228.227.98]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4026675008B for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:56:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: by auto-kanizsa.hu (Postfix, from userid 1038) id B1E291005A4F; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:45:27 +0200 (CEST) To: release-team@gnome.org Subject: You've received A Hallmark E-Card! From: hallmark.com Content-Type: text/html Message-Id: <20090619114527.B1E291005A4F@auto-kanizsa.hu> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:45:27 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:56:55 -0000
Hallmark.comShop OnlineHallmark MagazineE-Cards & MoreAt Gold Crown
      You have recieved A Hallmark E-Card.
 
  Hello!

You have recieved a Hallmark E-Card.

To see it, click here,

There's something special about that E-Card feeling. We invite you to make a friend's day and send one.

Hope to see you soon,
Your friends at Hallmark

Your privacy is our priority. Click the "Privacy and Security" link at the bottom of this E-mail to view our policy. 		 
 
Hallmark.com | Privacy & Security | Customer Service | Store Locator
From rosechr@gmail.com Fri Jun 19 21:44:57 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1708F7500D3; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:44:57 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.799 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, L_P0F_UNKN=0.8] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: UNKNOWN [S4:50:1:60:M1460,S,T,N,W9:.:?:?] (up: 5771 hrs), (link: ethernet/modem), [209.85.220.207] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sD7sopDF7zXf; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:44:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-fx0-f207.google.com (mail-fx0-f207.google.com [209.85.220.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AA07500DC; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:44:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so1275009fxm.15 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:44:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=96dCwwwzFB2rFoftOgzOzJrLpU9aJt5mSO5k97TpqMI=; b=WVn507wvt3ZIgX/1tl9sKLNTHpOSCJyGl/bN7iMgjm6VXCgwRh5UhGfjqYFjyJ5XnD dumKka4zg4KCChypftBKSlVn6AXZI+XtQdmPTEGzLzFeHovaK6dWLvA/MCAkClSUPmRQ L4XWJPSCiD/iBO1DvZ2sdlADgtZvQklZWRm4U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ruXG5lU4PWut21G7N9xzBTTe3HpHE5sfZVqErLKFeA0uaS5qWG7wid2H4F8gNzHNfo KQshRRr7krACJJIJKAB0n8ysTAnv9bKMaeiEBvjHIupqjAa/albbi78ERfF4UXYyBDKw SfAhoC35M5l5Eutk3OOUC5yip/nJr3Qb7z/+E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rosechr@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.115.193 with SMTP id j1mr2804437faq.85.1245447875980; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:44:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1245442271.12365.12.camel@shuttle> References: <20090617182912.28368.12263@progress.gnome.org> <1245266667.5545.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1245442271.12365.12.camel@shuttle> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:44:35 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0b1ed9b403ad7751 Message-ID: <97da516f0906191444g6cc6d1f2p12415acdf5842187@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: String additions to 'dasher.master' From: Christian Rose To: Claude Paroz , Patrick Welche , Peter Conlon , Aaron Larson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, Gnome Release Team X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:44:57 -0000 On 6/19/09, Claude Paroz wrote: > Le mercredi 17 juin 2009 =E0 21:24 +0200, Andre Klapper a =E9crit : > > Patrick, > > > > your latest dasher commits broke the string freeze: > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 18:29 +0000 schrieb GNOME Status Pages: > > > There have been following string additions to module 'dasher.master'= : > > > + "%age by which to automatically increase speed" > > > + "%age by which to decrease speed upon reverse" > > > + "Lag before user actually pushes button (ms)" > > > + "Time after which to automatically increase speed (secs)" > > > > Please either revert, or branch for a gnome-2-26 branch before those > > commits took place. > > See http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner/ . > > > That's the second string freeze break from dasher in this release and > still no reaction. > If dasher don't want to respect GNOME official workflows, should we > propose to withdraw it from the 2.28 Desktop release? If Dasher maintainers are repeatedly ignoring the GNOME freezes, it's indeed a very serious matter. Cc:ing the release team. Christian From pchenthill@novell.com Sat Jun 20 06:40:48 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D806A7500E3; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:40:47 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.541 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.541 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=1.981, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, TW_BG=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) (NAT!) (up: 11779 hrs), (distance 13, link: GPRS, T1, FreeS/WAN), [137.65.250.26] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oqriOKdr7HI2; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:40:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from victor.provo.novell.com (victor.provo.novell.com [137.65.250.26]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E69B7500E1; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:40:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (prv-ext-foundry1.gns.novell.com [137.65.251.240]) by victor.provo.novell.com with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:40:25 -0600 Subject: Re: Evolution thoughts for GNOME 3.0 From: Chenthill To: Andre Klapper In-Reply-To: <1245284488.5545.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1245262842.5451.35.camel@linux-900d> <1245284488.5545.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:04:31 +0530 Message-Id: <1245479671.15530.44.camel@linux-adcj> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.27.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: release-team , Srinivasa Ragavan , "evolution-hackers@gnome.org" , Matthew Barnes X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:40:48 -0000 On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 02:21 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 23:50 +0530 schrieb Srinivasa Ragavan: > > - Continue Evolution 2.26 as stable series till 3.0 comes out. > > - Treat Evolution 2.28 as a intermediate milestone for GNOME/Evolution > > 3.0 > > - Continue releasing Evolution 2.26.x (Evolution 2.26.5/6/7...) series > > as stable releases for GNOME 2.28.1/2/3 instead of releasing Evolution > > 2.28.1/2/3. > > You might call the stable Evolution releases "2.28.x" but create them > from the gnome-2-26 branch. On the other hand that is confusing if you > were up to continue calling the unstable series for 3.0 "2.27.x". > So we ship e.g. Evolution 2.26.6/.7 for GNOME 2.28.1/.2? > > > r-t: Having GNOME releases in mind I wonder which release suite an > Evolution 2.27.13 release would be part of in the last weeks of GNOME > 2.27.x - I don't think we should include a 2.27.13 Evolution release in > e.g. GNOME 2.27.92. People expect components of a release candidate (two > weeks before a major release) to be way more stable than Evolution > 2.27.13 at that time (6 months before a major release). > So how to ensure testing of the continued unstable branch in the last > weeks before 2.28.0? > r-t could think of an additional 2.29.0 release (shipping all modules > that have branched for gnome-3-0 already before 2.28 release) maybe one > week before 2.28.0? I somehow miss the last reply from Srini on this thread though I see it in web. So replying back to this. I like the idea of not branching and continue to port the code for killing bonobo from eds and evolution. But we also need to consider some patches which have added API and some string changes. There might not be many UI changes, but still there might be some useful ones. I don have the entire list now as we have not discussed/looked over them yet. I have not yet got the GSoc EDS optimization patches, but if I can get them over soon and if its good enough I would love to push them to stable branch along with calendar cache rewrite (http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28) (quoting one case). Thinking about the freezes API/ABI/Feature freezes coming along in a months time. What about branching for gnome-2-27 immediately after that and starting to merge the kill bonobo stuffs ? This would mean we will not need to think about the merging important patches with freeze breaks into stable. So instead of 9 months we would have 8 months. - Chenthill. > > > I expect lot of rewrites, dbus port merge, bonobo deprecation (kill > > bonobo merge). etc. I don't think, Evolution 2.28 can be stable, unless > > I postpone these tasks which might merge late in 2.28 cycle to really > > 2.29.x. > [...] > > Thoughts on this? > > After some bad experiences with kill-summary bugs in 2.24.x I agree with > your proposal to continue 2.27.x for the next 9 months and kind of drop > 2.28.x. > > > Secondly, Evolution uses GNOME canvas in and around every UI. I wanted > > to know the future direction/migration path, haven't seen one before. > > Its gonna be another painful task like deprecating bonobo with in > > Evolution :/. I would like to vote against this, if there is a > > possibility. > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571742 > > I still have not found out when and why libgnomecanvas was deprecated by > the release-team. Maybe someone remembers? > > According to http://www.gnome.org/~fpeters/299.html Evolution, planner > and gthumb use libgnomecanvas. > > andre From ak-47@gmx.net Sat Jun 20 18:54:28 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1004F750130 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:54:28 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.903 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, TW_BG=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 4781 hrs), (distance 19, link: ethernet/modem), [213.165.64.20] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZOekJtKbiyFw for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:54:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D11B750112 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:54:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2009 18:54:08 -0000 Received: from g1.blanicka25.net (EHLO [10.0.0.6]) [82.208.42.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 20 Jun 2009 20:54:08 +0200 X-Authenticated: #726810 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/SlmJqbxDSquoM+JlY9XJJZdPiWdMteeI/MjMT63 q39n/eZBgmurIr Subject: Re: Evolution thoughts for GNOME 3.0 From: Andre Klapper To: Chenthill In-Reply-To: <1245479671.15530.44.camel@linux-adcj> References: <1245262842.5451.35.camel@linux-900d> <1245284488.5545.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1245479671.15530.44.camel@linux-adcj> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:54:07 +0200 Message-Id: <1245524047.19697.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.5 Cc: release-team , Kjartan Maraas , Srinivasa Ragavan , Matthew Barnes X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:54:28 -0000 Hi Srini & Chen, Am Samstag, den 20.06.2009, 12:04 +0530 schrieb Chenthill: > But we also need to consider some patches which have added API and some > string changes. There might not be many UI changes, but still there > might be some useful ones. I don have the entire list now as we have not > discussed/looked over them yet. I have not yet got the GSoc EDS > optimization patches, but if I can get them over soon and if its good > enough I would love to push them to stable branch along with calendar > cache rewrite (http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28) (quoting one case). > > Thinking about the freezes API/ABI/Feature freezes coming along in a > months time. What about branching for gnome-2-27 immediately after that > and starting to merge the kill bonobo stuffs ? This would mean we will > not need to think about the merging important patches with freeze breaks > into stable. So instead of 9 months we would have 8 months. Chen has good points here. And Evolution branching early for gnome-2-28 (e.g. when the first freezes start) sounds like the best plan to me. I just like to ask the Evolution team to please decide on their schedule plans early and to communicate them properly so every developers knows (as it might be good to be conservative with committing bigger changes to master if everybody knows that branching for gnome-2-28 will happen "soon". People can wait and commit the bigger changes to master after branching for gnome-2-28.) Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 08:09 +0530 schrieb Srinivasa Ragavan: > > I still have not found out when and why libgnomecanvas was > > deprecated by the release-team. Maybe someone remembers? > I really need the migration path/future plans for this. It will be one > thing, that touches every bit of Evolution. Message list, calendar view, > addressbook etc.. everything uses GNOME Canvas. I would be happy to > continue with gnome-canvas, if possible. Still waiting for release-team members with a better knowledge of history (Kjartan maybe?) that can explain the decision to deprecate libgnomecanvas. I see two options: * Keep libgnomecanvas deprecated in GNOME 3 and hence allow Evolution 3 to use it. * Have libgnomecanvas removed in GNOME 3 and Evolution include it. Also see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571742#c6 . Because of the complexity of this task I currently favor option 1. IMO definitely give libgnomecanvas the lowest priority in cleaning up the Evolution deps/code. Other opinions? Silence means I will bring this up at the GUADEC r-t meeting anyway. ;-) andre -- mailto:ak-47@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper From ak-47@gmx.net Sun Jun 21 18:49:56 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D57975002E for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:49:56 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.18 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.18 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, L_P0F_UNKN=0.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: UNKNOWN [S4:45:1:60:M1460,S,T,N,W8:.:?:?] (up: 4804 hrs), (link: ethernet/modem), [213.165.64.20] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W5mi6hhzwmjo for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:49:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D047E7501B7 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:49:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2009 18:49:37 -0000 Received: from g1.blanicka25.net (EHLO [10.0.0.6]) [82.208.42.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp060) with SMTP; 21 Jun 2009 20:49:37 +0200 X-Authenticated: #726810 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//UdRhVOz/aREgm65x0XNjrlhSg6PCd/m1tzMjhS QSFbwI3uPD7DcL Subject: Re: GNOME 3.0 Roadmap - Release Management From: Andre Klapper To: release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <31a62e6f0906141122n507d4ae8iaa8c6ffd8bbc4c10@mail.gmail.com> References: <31a62e6f0906141122n507d4ae8iaa8c6ffd8bbc4c10@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:49:36 +0200 Message-Id: <1245610176.25482.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.57 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:49:56 -0000 Am Sonntag, den 14.06.2009, 19:22 +0100 schrieb Lucas Rocha: > 1. Summarize in one sentence/paragraph the goal(s) for Release > Management in GNOME 3.0 > 2. What are the goals for Release Management in GNOME 3.0? Well, you already had some ideas if I remember FOSDEM correctly. Like getting rid of the classic "officially included" concept for most apps, reduce gnome to core and instead introduce "blessed applications"? App certification: * Stuff that is already listed at http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing * plus no usage of any deprecated modules or symbols * provide reasons & advantages of being officially included / a blessed application. Higher likeliness to be translated to many languages, but what else? Maybe partially out of scope, but what I personally want to see in GNOME 3 is * some applications (probably "blessed" if we switch to new modulesets): tracker, gnome-scan, banshee and/or rhythmbox, maybe gnome-shell, maybe gnome-zeitgeist, maybe gnome-do * an fd.o thumbnailing spec implementation * higher quality by somehow automated or required http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/DistCheck * a great gnome.org webpage (2.28 goal) * better task-oriented documentation by initial Mallard implementations * rethinking autoconf/automake / waf (I only know that there's complaints, I don't have enough knowledge of this field) andre -- mailto:ak-47@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper From pchenthill@novell.com Mon Jun 22 07:11:05 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D027500C8 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:11:05 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.544 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.544 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=1.978, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, TW_BG=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Novell Netware 6 SP3, (distance 13, link: unknown-1390), [137.65.248.127] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4KkA5D1CISt3 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:10:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lucius.provo.novell.com (lucius.provo.novell.com [137.65.248.127]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1B8750050 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:10:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from INET-PRV1-MTA by lucius.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:10:45 -0600 Message-Id: <4A3EDA12020000DE00066650@lucius.provo.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.0 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:10:42 -0600 From: "P Chenthill" To: Subject: Re: Evolution thoughts for GNOME 3.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: mbarnes@redhat.com, kmaraas@broadpark.no, Srinivasa Ragavan , release-team@gnome.org X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:11:05 -0000 On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 20:54 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Hi Srini & Chen, >=20 > Am Samstag, den 20.06.2009, 12:04 +0530 schrieb Chenthill: > > But we also need to consider some patches which have added API and = some > > string changes. There might not be many UI changes, but still there > > might be some useful ones. I don have the entire list now as we have = not > > discussed/looked over them yet. I have not yet got the GSoc EDS > > optimization patches, but if I can get them over soon and if its good > > enough I would love to push them to stable branch along with calendar > > cache rewrite (http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28) (quoting one = case). > >=20 > > Thinking about the freezes API/ABI/Feature freezes coming along in a > > months time. What about branching for gnome-2-27 immediately after = that > > and starting to merge the kill bonobo stuffs ? This would mean we will > > not need to think about the merging important patches with freeze = breaks > > into stable. So instead of 9 months we would have 8 months. >=20 > Chen has good points here. > And Evolution branching early for gnome-2-28 (e.g. when the first > freezes start) sounds like the best plan to me. > I just like to ask the Evolution team to please decide on their schedule > plans early and to communicate them properly so every developers knows > (as it might be good to be conservative with committing bigger changes > to master if everybody knows that branching for gnome-2-28 will happen > "soon". People can wait and commit the bigger changes to master after > branching for gnome-2-28.) We would be discussing this in #evolution-meet on Wednesday and mail across the plans to e-h list. Thanks, Chenthill. >=20 > Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 08:09 +0530 schrieb Srinivasa Ragavan: > > > I still have not found out when and why libgnomecanvas was > > > deprecated by the release-team. Maybe someone remembers? > > I really need the migration path/future plans for this. It will be one > > thing, that touches every bit of Evolution. Message list, calendar = view, > > addressbook etc.. everything uses GNOME Canvas. I would be happy to > > continue with gnome-canvas, if possible.=20 >=20 > Still waiting for release-team members with a better knowledge of > history (Kjartan maybe?) that can explain the decision to deprecate > libgnomecanvas. >=20 > I see two options:=20 > * Keep libgnomecanvas deprecated in GNOME 3 and hence allow > Evolution 3 to use it.=20 > * Have libgnomecanvas removed in GNOME 3 and Evolution include it. > Also see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D571742#c6 . >=20 > Because of the complexity of this task I currently favor option 1. > IMO definitely give libgnomecanvas the lowest priority in cleaning up > the Evolution deps/code. >=20 > Other opinions? Silence means I will bring this up at the GUADEC r-t > meeting anyway. ;-) >=20 >=20 > andre From accounts@gnome.org Fri Jun 26 00:00:17 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0911D7500C7 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:17 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lSy7jXWEvtB0 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from window.gnome.org (window-back [172.31.1.13]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C81A75013A for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from window.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by window.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB106CC29C for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: GNOME 2.26.3 stable tarballs due From: Release Team To: release-team@gnome.org Message-Id: <20090626000007.3FB106CC29C@window.gnome.org> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:06 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:17 -0000 Hello all, Tarballs are due on 2009-06-29 before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 2.26.3 stable release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. Modules which were proposed for inclusion should try to follow the unstable schedule so everyone can test them. Please make sure that your tarballs will be uploaded before Monday 23:59 UTC: tarballs uploaded later than that will probably be too late to get in 2.26.3. If you are not able to make a tarball before this deadline or if you think you'll be late, please send a mail to the release team and we'll find someone to roll the tarball for you! For more information about 2.27, the full schedule, the official module lists and the proposed module lists, please see our colorful 2.27 page: http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see: http://live.gnome.org/Schedule Thanks, From hadess@hadess.net Fri Jun 26 10:11:50 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE607504BC; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:11:50 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.765 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.765 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.615, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.219] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (NAT!) (up: 3053 hrs), (distance 13, link: GPRS, T1, FreeS/WAN), [66.187.237.31] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTwN22-STqwL; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:11:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE37750080; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:11:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5QABZoI024274; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:11:35 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5QABYAR031196; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:11:34 -0400 Received: from [10.33.0.36] (snoogens.fab.redhat.com [10.33.0.36]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5QABWDJ003037; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:11:33 -0400 Subject: gnome-user-share branch for gnome-2-26 From: Bastien Nocera To: gnome-i18n@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:12:10 +0100 Message-Id: <1246011130.4017.121.camel@snoogens.fab.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.27.26 Cc: release-team@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:11:51 -0000 SSIA Cheers From spina@pillarg.com Sat Jun 27 18:04:44 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E24975007B for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:04:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.801 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.801 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, L_P0F_W=1.7, RDNS_NONE=0.1] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+, (distance 18, link: pppoe (DSL)), [190.97.78.109] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VHbny03O0xs7 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:04:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gdhdad.ert.com.co (unknown [190.97.78.109]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 150467500BF for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:04:30 +0000 (GMT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <595EEC313CFC51872A718EAA09@pillarg.com> From: "spina" To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-11" Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:04:41 -0100 Subject: Types off Huuman Pheromones X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:04:44 -0000 Tpyes of Human Phreomones www. pill55. net. Gitrl, 11, Charged With DUUI After Chase From accounts@gnome.org Sun Jun 28 00:00:13 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27877500A7 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:00:13 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.316 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.316 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFQrKNJcFxjX for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:00:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from window.gnome.org (window-back [172.31.1.13]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90A47501F3 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:00:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from window.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by window.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15E26CC2AA for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: GNOME 2.26.3 stable release From: Release Team To: release-team@gnome.org Message-Id: <20090628000004.C15E26CC2AA@window.gnome.org> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:00:04 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:00:14 -0000 Hello all, GNOME 2.26.3 stable release For more information about 2.27, the full schedule, the official module lists and the proposed module lists, please see our colorful 2.27 page: http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see: http://live.gnome.org/Schedule Thanks, From ak-47@gmx.net Sun Jun 28 22:38:23 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C69750007 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:38:23 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.063 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.063 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 4977 hrs), (distance 19, link: ethernet/modem), [213.165.64.20] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4fOkm1jfADiT for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:38:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA40A750077 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:38:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2009 22:38:04 -0000 Received: from g1.blanicka25.net (EHLO [10.0.0.5]) [82.208.42.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp066) with SMTP; 29 Jun 2009 00:38:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #726810 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19TQH1cGzhTlNz7D8Pu6YmHrQoSgs2KBbgsbvrSxc WGK4B1JiAAnKa/ Subject: [Fwd: Re: Glade3: Libgnome(ui) and bonobo] From: Andre Klapper To: Gnome Release Team Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:38:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1246228683.31294.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:38:23 -0000 So to keep GNOME3 cleanup progress tracked I'm forwarding this. Note that all bonobo/libgnome(ui) hits are in /plugins/gnome and configure.ac. andre -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Von: Tristan Van Berkom > An: Andre Klapper > Betreff: Re: Glade3: Libgnome(ui) and bonobo > Datum: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:09:24 -0400 > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: > > Hi Tristan, > > > > before I file useless bugs against Glade3, which of the following > > includes are needed by Glade3 for legacy support to create deprecated > > widgets and what is really stuff that should be removed for GNOME 3? > > Hi, > everything in the plugins/gnome directory is needed for support of > deprecated libgnomeui/bonoboui widgets (and ofcourse the line in > confgure.ac to detect its presence). > > I honestly havent thought hard about what Im going to do for > deprecated GTK+ widgets, that is probably going to depend on > how backwards compatability is offered. > > If theres a support lib offered to cover deprecated apis that > you can link along with GTK+ 3.0, then I will probably try to > depend on GTK+ 3.0 and offer the deprecated widgets in > a separate plugin, or possibly I will try to just virtualize all > the remaining deprecated widgets. > > Cheers, > -Tristan -- mailto:ak-47@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper From lucasr.at.mundo@gmail.com Mon Jun 29 08:27:29 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D7F7506D9 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:27:29 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (up: 5034 hrs), (distance 13, link: ethernet/modem), [209.85.221.177] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9q0yQomNMNP1 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:27:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-qy0-f177.google.com (mail-qy0-f177.google.com [209.85.221.177]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91097506A4 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:27:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so3283493qyk.13 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:27:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cOcVqAscYYnhloq9QTEEpRACW1oOrgo+hzMu6t1iiwQ=; b=RTKhwaZ21wCc2embDVW9L3UtYpa3zPOBGNVVZhWoQl+xYIGQNghrHnM3l3oMhhXzqR 9vRtnZRLLsZHLrgp5XDDDEJhTbcFsZSfWEimJUMroCDK0aKy6ndUs7Iy3vVzS2sxb1zd pwbL/yfEm1lAxjrExArYJqxj4XMy8y7zSJ1JQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=dMwDiM9gG+he0u3h26sVo6zyTXsaUDEl2GSSGwV016xXRQ0O/GM6IHbp8LCtYvQZyM /h7aPbeWc7vHtEaOvWdbOHdP2Ba8ulb938YuPwotAmtdzUhi5R0qPCe6Nh/IsdGvfyX4 DXjhGdb8yEPCkC1k1lKv1oTGZf15kYMbLV270= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lucasr.at.mundo@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.74.65 with SMTP id t1mr3654803vcj.89.1246264030416; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:27:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090628000004.C15E26CC2AA@window.gnome.org> References: <20090628000004.C15E26CC2AA@window.gnome.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:27:10 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 94129e4ed4d0dffa Message-ID: <31a62e6f0906290127r49d81b98rf2137c71fda3469a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: GNOME 2.26.3 stable release From: Lucas Rocha To: Release Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:27:29 -0000 Hi all, Thanks for whoever sent the announcement. :-) I will do this release. --lucasr 2009/6/28 Release Team : > Hello all, > > GNOME 2.26.3 stable release > > > For more information about 2.27, the full schedule, the official > module lists and the proposed module lists, please see our colorful 2.27 > page: > =A0 http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable > > For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see: > =A0 http://live.gnome.org/Schedule > > Thanks, > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > release-team@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > From vuntz@gnome.org Tue Jun 30 00:34:30 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC4F75010A for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:34:27 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) (up: 3693 hrs), (distance 23, link: ethernet/modem), [82.240.102.222] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ofD2sNT39uwz for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:34:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.240.102.222]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5109750296 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:33:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF5FF112731; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:33:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:33:44 +0200 From: Vincent Untz To: release-team@gnome.org Subject: gnome-panel & gnome-session tarballs for 2.26.3 Message-ID: <20090630003344.GK14341@vuntz.net> Mail-Followup-To: release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:34:30 -0000 Hey, I got busy with gnome-session patches, so I didn't have time to review the panel patches I wanted to review for 2.26.3, so I'll do the release tomorrow, if it's fine for Lucas. Also I'm waiting for http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=583345 before doing the 2.26.3 release of gnome-session. I can release without it, but if possible, I tend to prefer to have the patch in :-) Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From lucasr.at.mundo@gmail.com Tue Jun 30 08:41:09 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826C57500CC for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:41:09 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (up: 964 hrs), (distance 14, link: ethernet/modem), [209.85.212.200] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4DIXFK0dzwlZ for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:41:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-vw0-f200.google.com (mail-vw0-f200.google.com [209.85.212.200]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821217502C6 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:40:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: by vwj38 with SMTP id 38so121163vwj.13 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:40:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7VsXFcZXAMMUra/jv6fhIMpgTUAXyVPqsioMAodSpfQ=; b=rmDVr72kgqhlKNhFalvMnwjF0DEzf4VtSH4/6hLwuaq2sIgkMCEtoabvvxqpPEMtEq tEe6PQcl64CiZZtruK3P+qLkY+AwQgUFYMJzJAv3q9WMGQyJadtCDPboA15fZq2PROeq xT2HtfPdxa7GvBeskR0Scd/MjP7uuupDvJIGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=LjLrL3DX2pC00ChoorWBT3g/zfmtLLftHf27xfk40rKTFHMjg6DrRQcz0qTUfnkXjN Vjp5D1Qa75kTiLjM34Rnuv5LsNLa93leppN3ZSfvjfqkvK/jj/160rao+gIoeDfK4vWo JseOcn4da4W3OGAoNx1XwDa9NwPICZP7L19S0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lucasr.at.mundo@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.96.204 with SMTP id i12mr3395430vcn.94.1246351251488; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:40:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090630003344.GK14341@vuntz.net> References: <20090630003344.GK14341@vuntz.net> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:40:51 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4dfa457566953431 Message-ID: <31a62e6f0906300140g23624a3h18b81d7e1866813a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: gnome-panel & gnome-session tarballs for 2.26.3 From: Lucas Rocha To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:41:09 -0000 Hey, 2009/6/30 Vincent Untz : > Hey, > > I got busy with gnome-session patches, so I didn't have time to review > the panel patches I wanted to review for 2.26.3, so I'll do the release > tomorrow, if it's fine for Lucas. Fine for me. > Also I'm waiting for http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=583345 > before doing the 2.26.3 release of gnome-session. I can release without > it, but if possible, I tend to prefer to have the patch in :-) Makes sense :-) --lucasr From vuntz@gnome.org Tue Jun 30 13:04:40 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41290750325 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:04:40 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) (up: 3724 hrs), (distance 23, link: ethernet/modem), [82.240.102.222] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z2lXnQY8azfF for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:04:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.240.102.222]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B72F75032E for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:04:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD6D81126FA; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:04:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:04:03 +0200 From: Vincent Untz To: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Meeting during GUADEC? Message-ID: <20090630130403.GW14341@vuntz.net> Mail-Followup-To: release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:04:40 -0000 Hey, So, who'll be at GUADEC? I believe at least Andre, Lucas and I will be there; both Fred can't make it, afaik. Do we want to do a small meeting on some day? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From olav@bkor.dhs.org Tue Jun 30 13:18:55 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218D47502FB for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:18:55 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, L_P0F_Unix=-1] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Solaris 10 (beta), (distance 18, link: ethernet/modem), [62.179.121.36] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xxs76u5qokHM for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:18:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from viefep16-int.chello.at (viefep16-int.chello.at [62.179.121.36]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB4E7500CC for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:18:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from edge04.upc.biz ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep16-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090630131836.XMWO8253.viefep16-int.chello.at@edge04.upc.biz> for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:18:36 +0200 Received: from bkor.dhs.org ([62.194.217.172]) by edge04.upc.biz with edge id ADJb1c06h3jliGW04DJcyq; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:18:36 +0200 X-SourceIP: 62.194.217.172 Received: by bkor.dhs.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 163E7C92178; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:11:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:11:58 +0200 From: Olav Vitters To: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: Meeting during GUADEC? Message-ID: <20090630131157.GC10054@bkor.dhs.org> References: <20090630130403.GW14341@vuntz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090630130403.GW14341@vuntz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:18:55 -0000 On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > So, who'll be at GUADEC? I believe at least Andre, Lucas and I will be > there; both Fred can't make it, afaik. Will not attend GUADEC. -- Regards, Olav From ak-47@gmx.net Tue Jun 30 13:26:56 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8017275032E for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:26:56 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.02 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.02 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 5015 hrs), (distance 19, link: ethernet/modem), [213.165.64.20] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MFfxp21GZiCy for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:26:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D073C750320 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:26:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2009 13:26:36 -0000 Received: from g1.blanicka25.net (EHLO [10.0.0.5]) [82.208.42.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 30 Jun 2009 15:26:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #726810 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19e9Y932xReoWCXtNzYuCndpXtnlVrG8tWndYz9Xe moVD4iUecvHpcG Subject: Re: Meeting during GUADEC? From: Andre Klapper To: release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20090630130403.GW14341@vuntz.net> References: <20090630130403.GW14341@vuntz.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:26:35 +0200 Message-Id: <1246368395.4599.99.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.67 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:26:56 -0000 Am Dienstag, den 30.06.2009, 15:04 +0200 schrieb Vincent Untz: > So, who'll be at GUADEC? I believe at least Andre, Lucas and I will be > there; both Fred can't make it, afaik. > > Do we want to do a small meeting on some day? Karsten and me will be around from Friday evening to Wednesday morning. I'm fine with a spontaneous beach meeting, though we need to have an r-t meeting two weeks later anyway for module inclusion decisions. ;-) andre -- mailto:ak-47@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper From fcrozat@mandriva.com Tue Jun 30 15:34:36 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2634F7502D7 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:34:36 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) (up: 7727 hrs), (distance 24, link: ethernet/modem), [212.85.150.166] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ruE4EE5i+pA3 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:34:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mandriva.com (mx1.moondrake.net [212.85.150.166]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389A9750353 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:33:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mx1.mandriva.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 12184274022; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Virus: No Received: from office-abk.mandriva.com (office-abk.mandriva.com [84.55.162.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2069727401E for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.216] (fw2.mandriva.com [192.168.2.3]) by office-abk.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65705828DD for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:40:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Meeting during GUADEC? From: Frederic Crozat To: release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20090630131157.GC10054@bkor.dhs.org> References: <20090630130403.GW14341@vuntz.net> <20090630131157.GC10054@bkor.dhs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Organization: Mandriva Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1246375986.30099.48.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1.1-1mdv2009.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:34:37 -0000 Le mardi 30 juin 2009 à 15:11 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > So, who'll be at GUADEC? I believe at least Andre, Lucas and I will be > > there; both Fred can't make it, afaik. > > Will not attend GUADEC. Same for me, I won't be there. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue Jun 30 16:05:10 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C2575010E for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:05:10 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 1571 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.198.239] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hcbsPTJ8T-VZ for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:05:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.239]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B93750319 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:04:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so92116rvf.3 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:04:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vPkVU9nPGgBiXjcVGwaohyp5bGwYdIdsJtGurnAfFiY=; b=HK0sZmIHKlxAB0xCZf1Sj+6Zg8m/ztOqIxnxu7pXKLByJLJZHTYm3+n7qeWCOtePnI 7jFLf5N1E7oYCgZ88K8OkCmltJ5adRRnGmUfIpjnNNfVHELAS48jfAZ0fV9zvQnpnE2Z 062EKuSb8rbYOT753w6aACt1MFEfjx2lNvahk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=S63Ps2twp9/KOcnLTHVruXyUWZlr8qpHES4QxQWv17DxRGBMAGPj279F3+Wwyg05fy t4dLmyFPl8BGA1Ng4e5Dz2EfnvKadAsZ++JHXDkM+dmYyG+X9qSxKEGMLbi6w4ZtiTa9 cdhRtztZDcDkcFjsGkPBZvX/1OEvRj/DiPvk8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.133.10 with SMTP id g10mr1973023rvd.16.1246377894586; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:04:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1246375986.30099.48.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> References: <20090630130403.GW14341@vuntz.net> <20090630131157.GC10054@bkor.dhs.org> <1246375986.30099.48.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:04:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Meeting during GUADEC? From: Matthias Clasen To: Frederic Crozat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: release-team@gnome.org X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:05:10 -0000 On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Frederic Crozat wro= te: > Le mardi 30 juin 2009 =E0 15:11 +0200, Olav Vitters a =E9crit : >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: >> > So, who'll be at GUADEC? I believe at least Andre, Lucas and I will be >> > there; both Fred can't make it, afaik. >> >> Will not attend GUADEC. > > Same for me, I won't be there. > Me neither