How to creata one big DOM from Multiple DOMS

NOTE: setting innerHTML in an xhtml context expects an xmlfragment, not an html one. Bad naming, I know. :) Unfortunately use of the libxml SAX2 parser for this "setInnerHTML" xml parsing barfs due to the fact that the xml fragment we're parsing does not contain all of the necessary namespace definitions. Yet, as far as I know, this the above code should be valid, since the xml fragment should be evaluated in the context of the document. Currently I support this Thoughts? -eric > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ > veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http:// > xmlsoft.org/ > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From nilesh.jain@intel.com Wed Oct 5 22:15:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E56D3B3647 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 22:15:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03050-05 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 22:15:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr001.fm.intel.com (fmr13.intel.com [192.55.52.67]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628013B3622 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 22:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr101.fm.intel.com (fmsfmr101.fm.intel.com [10.253.24.21]) by fmsfmr001.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j962FYCl010179; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 02:15:34 GMT Received: from fmsmsxvs040.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxvs040.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.124]) by fmsfmr101.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id j962FDSY024622; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 02:15:33 GMT Received: from fmsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.156]) by fmsmsxvs040.fm.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id M2005100519153328238 ; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 19:15:33 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.219]) by fmsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 19:15:33 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [xml] libxml questions Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 19:15:32 -0700 Message-ID: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F960917AD84@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [xml] libxml questions Thread-Index: AcXJ+RuVG2VbMhDTSwWQmrnsSpC0aAAIcqVg From: "Jain, Nilesh" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2005 02:15:33.0591 (UTC) FILETIME=[D4F87E70:01C5CA1B] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.253.24.21 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.746 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB] X-Spam-Score: -4.746 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 02:15:41 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@redhat.com] >Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:07 PM >To: Jain, Nilesh >Cc: xml@gnome.org >Subject: Re: [xml] libxml questions > >On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:34:08AM -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote: >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@redhat.com] >> > >> >On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 02:34:48PM -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote: >> >> No, I got it.. its working.. but the oldest tarball I see there is >> >> 2.6.20 so having problem running against the libxml2 which is >> currently >> >> shipped with the distro, most of them are still on 2.6.17... and no >> test >> >> tarball available for that.. Are these test forward compatible I >> mean >> >> can I run 2.6.17 test against 2.6.22 libxml2? >> > >> > it probably won't work: >> > - because the API extended >> > - because testing schemas regression tests on older releases won't >> > work either. >> >> Can you help me understand why schemas regression tests won't work on >> older release. Is it because of schema change.. or something else. > > Incredibly hard to implement fully. > Is there any design/architecture document on external/internal regression test cases.. I would like to understand the what functionality these test cases test? if it is something we should have for distro to confirm the ABI.. then want to understand the architecture/structure so that I will be able to integrate with LSB runtime test suite. Thanks, Nilesh=20 From sl1200mk2@free.fr Thu Oct 6 12:43:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25C83B3C07 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:43:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30353-07 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:43:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.fr (smtp3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.28]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC4F3B3C08 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:43:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0309.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 070A91C007A7 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:43:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.113] (ASt-Lambert-152-1-41-162.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.124.167.162]) by mwinf0309.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 84A1B1C007FF for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:43:53 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20051006164353543.84A1B1C007FF@mwinf0309.wanadoo.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <23b991cdd931a9b2be7a5555a7997582@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: xml@gnome.org From: nico Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:40:29 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS, RCVD_IN_SORBS, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_MX] X-Spam-Score: -4.31 X-Spam-Level: Subject: [xml] parsing error X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:43:57 -0000 hi i'm "novice" with libxml2 i always get this error when i try to parse an xml document. can someone explain me this? best regards nicolas Thread 0 Crashed: 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x900029c8 szone_malloc + 0xd8 1 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90000c18 malloc_zone_malloc + 0x94 2 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90001a00 malloc + 0x44 3 libxml2.2.dylib 0x808344dc xmlNewCharEncodingHandler + 0xec 4 libxml2.2.dylib 0x8083464c xmlInitCharEncodingHandlers + 0xf0 5 libxml2.2.dylib 0x8084edac xmlInitParser + 0x68 6 D::Light 0x00002f64 extractfromxml + 0x20 From jpalomino@tcpsi.es Thu Oct 6 12:58:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398D93B3C30 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:58:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31293-06 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:58:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tcpsi.com (unknown [62.93.168.242]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8CE3B3C08 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:58:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from elmo by tcpsi.com (Servidor de Correo TCP Sistemas e Ingenieria) with ASMTP id MUA38526; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:58:39 +0200 Message-ID: <009a01c5ca97$083990f0$141113ac@tcpsi.es> From: "Juan David Palomino" To: Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:57:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0097_01C5CAA7.CB89EBD0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_44, HTML_MESSAGE] X-Spam-Score: 2.999 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Flag: YES Cc: Julio Rodriguez Garcia Subject: [xml] Encoding UTF-8 X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:58:04 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0097_01C5CAA7.CB89EBD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi to all, i have problems generating a file with encoding UTF-8. I don't know what to do to create the files with encoding UTF-8. Now i = create the xml files without any encoding. What function or method set the encoding? Please Help. Thanks. ************************************************************************************************************************************************ *La informaci=F3n contenida en este mensaje de correo electr=F3nico es confidencial y puede revestir el car=E1cter de reservada. * *Est=E1 dirigida exclusivamente a la persona destinataria. * *El acceso o cualquier uso por parte de cualquier otra persona de este mensaje no est=E1n autorizados y pueden ser ilegales.* *Si no es Ud. la persona destinataria, le rogamos que proceda a borrarlo. * *The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. * *It is intended solely for the addressee. * *Access or any use by any other person to this Internet e-mail is not authorised and may be unlawful. * *If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail. * ************************************************************************************************************************************************ ------=_NextPart_000_0097_01C5CAA7.CB89EBD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi to all, i have problems generating a = file with=20 encoding UTF-8.

I don't know what to do to = create the files=20 with encoding UTF-8. Now i create the xml files without any=20 encoding.

What function or method set the=20 encoding?

Please Help.

Thanks.















************************************************************************************************************************************************
*La informaci=F3n contenida en este mensaje de correo electr=F3nico es confidencial y puede revestir el car=E1cter de reservada.   *
*Est=E1 dirigida exclusivamente a la persona destinataria.                                                                                                   *
*El acceso o cualquier uso por parte de cualquier otra persona de este mensaje no est=E1n autorizados y pueden ser ilegales.*
*Si no es Ud. la persona destinataria, le rogamos que proceda a borrarlo.                                                                          *
*The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.                                                                        *
*It is intended solely for the addressee.                                                                                                                           *
*Access or any use by any other person to this Internet e-mail is not authorised and may be unlawful.                                 *
*If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail.                                                                                         *
************************************************************************************************************************************************

------=_NextPart_000_0097_01C5CAA7.CB89EBD0-- From K.Buchcik@4commerce.de Thu Oct 6 13:33:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FF43B16DE for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:33:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01149-08 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:33:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.firmenpost.de (europa.4commerce.de [213.239.204.146]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79DA3B16DC for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:33:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ENZcL-00069N-05; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 19:33:17 +0200 Received: from pegasus.omega.4commerce.de ([10.1.2.11]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ENZcJ-00069I-JI; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 19:33:16 +0200 Received: pegasus 10.1.2.11 from 10.1.72.1 10.1.72.1 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from librax by pegasus; 06 Oct 2005 19:33:07 +0200 From: Kasimier Buchcik To: Juan David Palomino In-Reply-To: <009a01c5ca97$083990f0$141113ac@tcpsi.es> References: <009a01c5ca97$083990f0$141113ac@tcpsi.es> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 19:33:07 +0200 Message-Id: <1128619987.1272.36.camel@librax> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Subject: Re: [xml] Encoding UTF-8 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at firmenpost.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: K.Buchcik@4commerce.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.firmenpost.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Level: Cc: ML-libxml2 X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:33:13 -0000 Hi, On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 18:57 +0200, Juan David Palomino wrote: > Hi to all, i have problems generating a file with encoding UTF-8. > I don't know what to do to create the files with encoding UTF-8. Now i > create the xml files without any encoding. > > What function or method set the encoding? You could use xmlSaveFileEnc() [1] to save it with the desired encoding. An omitted "encoding" in the XML-declaration of your document means that the document is either encoded in UTF-8 or UTF-16. If serialized by Libxml2, this would be UTF-8, since this is Libxml2's internal encoding and thus the default encoding used for serialization. It might be that your document is already UTF-8 encoded, but the declaration simply does not mention this fact. [1] http://www.xmlsoft.org/html/libxml-tree.html#xmlSaveFile Regards, Kasimier From K.Buchcik@4commerce.de Thu Oct 6 13:53:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEBF3B3B6F for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:53:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02447-05 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:53:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.firmenpost.de (europa.4commerce.de [213.239.204.146]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5654F3B0BBF for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:53:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ENZwL-0006Ba-LN; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 19:53:57 +0200 Received: from pegasus.omega.4commerce.de ([10.1.2.11]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ENZwK-0006BU-8e; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 19:53:57 +0200 Received: pegasus 10.1.2.11 from 10.1.72.1 10.1.72.1 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from librax by pegasus; 06 Oct 2005 19:53:48 +0200 From: Kasimier Buchcik To: Juan David Palomino In-Reply-To: <00aa01c5ca9d$9f327ed0$141113ac@tcpsi.es> References: <009a01c5ca97$083990f0$141113ac@tcpsi.es> <1128619987.1272.36.camel@librax> <00aa01c5ca9d$9f327ed0$141113ac@tcpsi.es> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 19:53:47 +0200 Message-Id: <1128621227.1272.37.camel@librax> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Subject: Re: [xml] Encoding UTF-8 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at firmenpost.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: K.Buchcik@4commerce.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.firmenpost.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Level: Cc: ML-libxml2 X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:53:54 -0000 Hi, On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 19:44 +0200, Juan David Palomino wrote: > OK. But what i must to do to save de xml into a string? > Can you tell me how to use xmlSaveFileTo? > I 'm not to be able to pass a xmlOutputBufferPtr to a string. Did you already looked at: http://www.xmlsoft.org/xmlio.html#Example2 Regards, Kasimier From veillard@redhat.com Fri Oct 7 23:33:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72ABE3B5281 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:33:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30884-03 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:33:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707503B5283 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:31:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j983Vi9j030378; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:31:44 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j983VcV03930; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:31:38 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j983Vc3X021934; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:31:38 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j983VcBt021932; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:31:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:31:38 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: "Jain, Nilesh" Subject: Re: [xml] libxml questions Message-ID: <20051008033138.GB19390@redhat.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F960917AD84@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F960917AD84@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.669 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_PM] X-Spam-Score: -4.669 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:33:58 -0000 On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 07:15:32PM -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@redhat.com] > >Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:07 PM > >To: Jain, Nilesh > >Cc: xml@gnome.org > >Subject: Re: [xml] libxml questions > > > >On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:34:08AM -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote: > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@redhat.com] > >> > > >> >On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 02:34:48PM -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote: > >> >> No, I got it.. its working.. but the oldest tarball I see there is > >> >> 2.6.20 so having problem running against the libxml2 which is > >> currently > >> >> shipped with the distro, most of them are still on 2.6.17... and > no > >> test > >> >> tarball available for that.. Are these test forward compatible I > >> mean > >> >> can I run 2.6.17 test against 2.6.22 libxml2? > >> > > >> > it probably won't work: > >> > - because the API extended > >> > - because testing schemas regression tests on older releases > won't > >> > work either. > >> > >> Can you help me understand why schemas regression tests won't work on > >> older release. Is it because of schema change.. or something else. > > > > Incredibly hard to implement fully. > > > > Is there any design/architecture document on external/internal > regression test cases.. I would like to understand the what > functionality these test cases test? if it is something we should have > for distro to confirm the ABI.. then want to understand the > architecture/structure so that I will be able to integrate with LSB > runtime test suite. The closest is the xmlschemas-dev@w3.org and public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org archives at W3C (especially Kasimier posts about it), I think there is a page at W3C too but I can't find it right now. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From veillard@redhat.com Fri Oct 7 23:38:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064C53B1881 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:38:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31463-01 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:38:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DABA3B5236 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:36:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j983aCGX031325; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:36:12 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j983aCV04444; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:36:12 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j983aBJk022604; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:36:11 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j983aBAD022602; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:36:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:36:11 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: Eric Seidel Subject: Re: [xml] Adding pre-defined namespaces Message-ID: <20051008033611.GC19390@redhat.com> References: <22315C06-DFB7-41F6-B91A-95F080790A27@apple.com> <20051005221414.GE26865@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.592 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_PM, TW_XH] X-Spam-Score: -1.592 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:38:47 -0000 On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:41:22PM -0700, Eric Seidel wrote: > > On Oct 5, 2005, at 3:14 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > >On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:45:33AM -0700, Eric Seidel wrote: > >>Another example is when parsing document fragments for things such as > >>setInnerHTML in an xhtml context... There we need to build up a > >>"namespace stack" representing the current document context before > >>doing the actual parse. > > > > I don't understand, either it's XHTML in which case it is XML > >and an XML parser should work or it's not. Trying to parse XML island > >in non well-formed XML'like HTML opens the door to so many error case > >that loosing the namespace sounds just liek a small side effect. > > As far as I understand, this is completely valid javascript + xhtml, > which we'd like to support (and I do currently, through some of my > own hacks): > > > > >

> > > > NOTE: setting innerHTML in an xhtml context expects an xmlfragment, > not an html one. Bad naming, I know. :) Okay, I understand better, one case of use of the namespace from the PCDATA and not from the markup itself... nasty :-) > Unfortunately use of the libxml SAX2 parser for this "setInnerHTML" > xml parsing barfs due to the fact that the xml fragment we're parsing It should complain but still produce a tree though. > does not contain all of the necessary namespace definitions. Yet, as > far as I know, this the above code should be valid, since the xml > fragment should be evaluated in the context of the document. > > Currently I support this > > Thoughts? This is a bit far stretched IMHO, but I understand, maybe I can add a small API to add in-scope namespace like that, I find that slightly disturbing though the parsing really should be context free ... Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From sl1200mk2@free.fr Thu Oct 6 12:40:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7D63B3BE2 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:40:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29978-09 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.fr (smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813413B3BC3 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6F7B81FF97BB for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:40:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.113] (ASt-Lambert-152-1-41-162.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.124.167.162]) by mwinf0102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3DF831FF97E9 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:40:36 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20051006164036254.3DF831FF97E9@mwinf0102.wanadoo.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <296976c07a13a90870a902fd6a14d285@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: xml@gnome.org From: nico Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:37:11 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS, RCVD_IN_SORBS, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_MX] X-Spam-Score: -4.31 X-Spam-Level: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 17:46:45 -0400 Subject: [xml] parsing error X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:40:40 -0000 hi i'm "novice" with libxml2 i always get this error when i try to parse an xml document. can someone explain me this? best regards nicolas Thread 0 Crashed: 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x900029c8 szone_malloc + 0xd8 1 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90000c18 malloc_zone_malloc + 0x94 2 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90001a00 malloc + 0x44 3 libxml2.2.dylib 0x808344dc xmlNewCharEncodingHandler + 0xec 4 libxml2.2.dylib 0x8083464c xmlInitCharEncodingHandlers + 0xf0 5 libxml2.2.dylib 0x8084edac xmlInitParser + 0x68 6 D::Light 0x00002f64 extractfromxml + 0x20 From moissinac@enst.fr Sun Oct 9 12:24:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561D63B2BA0 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:24:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20737-08 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:24:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp2.enst.fr (revol3.enst.fr [137.194.2.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF823B1CDB for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 11:19:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D12A62D1 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:19:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.enst.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (revol3.enst.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25214-05 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:18:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from infres.enst.fr (infres.enst.fr [137.194.192.1]) by smtp2.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D228962C2 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:18:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [137.194.3.81] (pptp3-81.enst.fr [137.194.3.81]) by infres.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BBC13CBB for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:18:59 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <434934E8.8050203@enst.fr> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:19:04 +0200 From: Jean-Claude Moissinac User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xml@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at enst.fr X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.746 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB] X-Spam-Score: -4.746 X-Spam-Level: Subject: [xml] SAX and ENTITY X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:24:34 -0000 Hello I need to process ENTITY in XML files that I receive progressively. To process progressively these XML files, I'm using the chunk parsing mechanism with a SAX parser. But Idon't find how to process files with ENTITY lines like I have seen on http://xmlsoft.org/entities.html the paragraph: "WARNING: handling entities on top of the libxml2 SAX interface is difficult!!! If you plan to use non-predefined entities in your documents, then the learning curve to handle then using the SAX API may be long. If you plan to use complex documents, I strongly suggest you consider using the DOM interface instead and let libxml deal with the complexity rather than trying to do it yourself." But, I don't find more documentation. Is parsing the sources of libxml the only way to find "documentation" about how to handle entities? Is there a sample somewhere? Thank you in advance -- Jean-Claude Moissinac Department of Computer Science and Networks ENST Paris FRANCE E-mail: moissinac@enst.fr Tel: (+33) 1.45.81.80.88 Fax: (+33) 1.45.81.71.58 http://shadok.enst.fr/jcm From graham-libxml@simulcra.org Sun Oct 9 16:41:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D32A3B0706 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:41:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08710-08 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:41:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lamity.org (lamity.org [212.13.197.69]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A91F3B1237 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:41:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 5490 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Oct 2005 20:41:18 -0000 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:41:18 +0100 From: Graham Bennett To: xml@gnome.org Message-ID: <20051009204118.GC18937@lamity.org> Mail-Followup-To: xml@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Level: Subject: [xml] xmlSchemaSAXPlug and xsi:schemaLocation X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:41:26 -0000 Hi, I've been playing with xmlSchemaSAXPlug to do schema validation on my own stream of SAX events and it's proving to be very useful. However it seems that a schema is required to be provided up front in order to get an xmlSchemaValidCtxt. Is there any automatic way to handle the situation where the schema location is provided as an xsi:schemaLocation attribute in the SAX stream, or should I just handle it myself? I suppose I should be able to detect such an attribute, plug in the validating sax handler, then replay the events I have already seen, but this seems a bit messy. Thanks, Graham. -- Graham Bennett From graham-libxml@simulcra.org Sun Oct 9 17:01:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D39C3B1BA8 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:01:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09916-08 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:01:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lamity.org (lamity.org [212.13.197.69]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6CB83B1BF1 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:01:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 10931 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Oct 2005 21:01:00 -0000 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 22:01:00 +0100 From: Graham Bennett To: xml@gnome.org Message-ID: <20051009210100.GD18937@lamity.org> Mail-Followup-To: xml@gnome.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.669 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_XN] X-Spam-Score: -4.669 X-Spam-Level: Subject: [xml] relaxng equivalent of xmlSchemaSAXPlug? X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:01:09 -0000 Hi, I was wondering if there was functionality in libxml2 equivalent to xmlSchemaSAXPlug that would do relaxng validation? cheers, Graham. -- Graham Bennett From nilesh.jain@intel.com Sun Oct 9 20:42:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFFB3B087D for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:42:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21280-03 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:42:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr006.fm.intel.com (fmr16.intel.com [192.55.52.70]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE3F3B09CF for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:42:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com (fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com [10.253.24.20]) by fmsfmr006.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j9A0gSQR002285; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:42:28 GMT Received: from fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.128]) by fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id j9A0gGl9027540; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:42:28 GMT Received: from fmsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.156]) by fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id M2005100917422720728 ; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:42:27 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.219]) by fmsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:42:27 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:42:26 -0700 Message-ID: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F96091F0B3E@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: DTD question.. Thread-Index: AcXLuNWVko3uiiYSRCa0NncxIwfX6ABej2dQ From: "Jain, Nilesh" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2005 00:42:27.0835 (UTC) FILETIME=[7D40C4B0:01C5CD33] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.253.24.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org Subject: [xml] DTD question.. X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:42:36 -0000 Is there any place where I can get the information about how does xml2 handles the DTDs. Does it or application has to take care of that. Is it follow any FHS recommendations, or provide any guidelines. Thanks, Nilesh =20 From veillard@redhat.com Sun Oct 9 23:18:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11CF3B2125 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:18:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28335-10 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:18:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900E33B119E for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:18:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9A3I2N0004027 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:18:02 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9A3I2V17269 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:18:02 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9A3I24g004356 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:18:02 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j9A3I2mo004354 for xml@gnome.org; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:18:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:18:02 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: xml@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xml] relaxng equivalent of xmlSchemaSAXPlug? Message-ID: <20051010031802.GA3759@redhat.com> References: <20051009210100.GD18937@lamity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051009210100.GD18937@lamity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.592 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_PM, TW_XN] X-Spam-Score: -4.592 X-Spam-Level: X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 03:18:20 -0000 On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 10:01:00PM +0100, Graham Bennett wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if there was functionality in libxml2 equivalent to > xmlSchemaSAXPlug that would do relaxng validation? Unfortunately due to the type of validator implemented for Relax-NG that's not possible. changing the type of validator would require some serious work. I considered doing the same for DTD validation, it should not be too hard with the current code but this is less useful. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From veillard@redhat.com Sun Oct 9 23:21:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809CC3B216C for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:21:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28850-03 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:21:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5D93B2180 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:20:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9A3KewX004658; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:20:40 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9A3KZV17593; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:20:35 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9A3KZm7004665; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:20:35 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j9A3KZcq004663; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:20:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:20:35 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: "Jain, Nilesh" Subject: Re: [xml] DTD question.. Message-ID: <20051010032035.GB3759@redhat.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F96091F0B3E@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F96091F0B3E@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.669 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_PM] X-Spam-Score: -4.669 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 03:21:42 -0000 On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 05:42:26PM -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote: > Is there any place where I can get the information about how does xml2 > handles the DTDs. Does it or application has to take care of that. Is it > follow any FHS recommendations, or provide any guidelines. by default libxml2 operates as a non validating parser, unless the flags are given as parser options. I don't see hos FHS would relate in any way, DTDs use public and system identifiers they are not file paths, and the XML Catalogs system from OASIS is implemented for their resolution. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From K.Buchcik@4commerce.de Mon Oct 10 04:30:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE7B3B2284 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:30:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22564-03 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:30:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.firmenpost.de (europa.4commerce.de [213.239.204.146]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153A83B2387 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:30:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EOt2r-0002dT-Pz; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:05 +0200 Received: from pegasus.omega.4commerce.de ([10.1.2.11]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EOt2r-0002dN-A8; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:05 +0200 Received: pegasus 10.1.2.11 from 10.1.72.1 10.1.72.1 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from librax by pegasus; 10 Oct 2005 10:30:06 +0200 From: Kasimier Buchcik To: Graham Bennett In-Reply-To: <20051009204118.GC18937@lamity.org> References: <20051009204118.GC18937@lamity.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1128933006.1272.15.camel@librax> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Subject: Re: [xml] xmlSchemaSAXPlug and xsi:schemaLocation X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at firmenpost.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: K.Buchcik@4commerce.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.firmenpost.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Level: Cc: ML-libxml2 X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:30:16 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 21:41 +0100, Graham Bennett wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing with xmlSchemaSAXPlug to do schema validation on my > own stream of SAX events and it's proving to be very useful. However it > seems that a schema is required to be provided up front in order to get > an xmlSchemaValidCtxt. > > Is there any automatic way to handle the situation where the schema > location is provided as an xsi:schemaLocation attribute in the SAX > stream, or should I just handle it myself? I suppose I should be able > to detect such an attribute, plug in the validating sax handler, then > replay the events I have already seen, but this seems a bit messy. Create the schema validation context with a NULL for the @schema argument if you want to switch on xsi-driven schema acquisition. Internally a new schema will be created during the validation and all the schemata, specified via xsi, will be constructed. However, this is a bit limited, since Libxml2's schema processors wants references to schema components to be resolved after each schema construction episode; thus it will work only on a subset of all the possible scenarios. E.g. if you have a schema at the document element, which references a component which would be acquired deeper in the tree (via a second xsi acquisition) then you would get a reference resolution error with Libxml2, while the spec allows such "late binding". Regards, Kasimier From gpn.libxml@gmail.com Mon Oct 10 08:44:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973DA3B1AF5 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:44:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09142-01 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:44:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DDB3B0C66 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:44:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so125031nzk for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:44:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nht3Qjttl83OVoO314bgpcSVHGy63HRCAYB41j68IFW1E4LWRMrXwUgpYz9j0LKdDoH0+vEgH3kKoayiVu5LuWgJsDJccf8rvtjM23uTzFK4jAQvtnbAIoBfTFOQGN93Wh5YiwMKjXA7RhPR06uhZum4pKaApxwGplgZZEzjJDU= Received: by 10.36.221.76 with SMTP id t76mr2848067nzg; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.254? ( [59.144.1.143]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 6sm3602328nzn.2005.10.10.05.44.23; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <434A61E7.2050103@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:13:19 +0530 From: GPN User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: veillard@redhat.com Subject: Re: [xml] Changes which might be required "Not converting names to lower-case in HTML parsing" References: <433AA0E8.1010208@gmail.com> <20050928150633.GK23250@redhat.com> <433B9D24.7040608@gmail.com> <20050929091153.GR23250@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20050929091153.GR23250@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:44:30 -0000 Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:22:04PM +0530, GPN wrote: > >>Daniel Veillard wrote: >> >>>>I am assuming that pretty much all HTML related functionality >>>>is contained within HTMLparser.c, and the core xml functions >>>>need not change to accomodate this enhancement. >>> >>> >>> This enhancement will have to be conditional to a parsing option. >> >>Daniel, Can you expand on this? > > > Sure: > when you create an html parsing context like with htmlReadFile > you pass an options arguments which is a set of OR'ed htmlParserOption > There is already a few of them, another one would need to be added > to preserve case. > Then the places where you want to make the changes should be tested > against the ctxt->options for that new option. > This allows to plug your new behaviour without disturbing the default > one. > > Daniel > I use the following API's to create a context and subsequently parse the buffers - htmlCreatePushParserCtxt() htmlParseChunk() Based on your inputs above, I am assuming that you are referring to the options: - enum xmlParserOption defined in include/libxml/parser.h - enum htmlParserOption defined in include/libxml/HTMLparser.h htmlCtxtUseOptions() does the following - a) Normalize the HTML options to XML options Probably to reflect the options in the core parsing engine b) Sets some members of the context structure Probably for ease of condition checking. "HTML_PARSE_RETAINCASE" could be added as the additional option, but need not reflect as a core XML parsing option. Do we need to add a member in the context structure (something like retainCase)? Reply sent by you earlier - >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:25:52PM +0530, GPN wrote: >> >>>Hello, >>>I am working off release 2.6.22, and I am proposing the >>>following changes to the code. >>>- A new function xmlStrcaseEqual() might be required in >>> xmlstring.c, which can check if the current character >>> being parsed is between 'A' and 'Z', and if so compares >>> using casemap array as is done in xmlStrcasecmp(). >> >> >> not needed, just !xmlStrcasecmp() the API is too large already >> Do these checks have to be made conditional? For e.g. if (options & HTML_PARSE_RETAINCASE) { if (!xmlStrcasecmp()) { /* Code segment */ } } else { if (xmlStrEqual()) { /* Code segment */ } } instead of - if (xmlStrequal()) >>>- In htmlParseName(), the condition which checks if the >>> current character is upper-case, and which transforms >>> it needs to be removed. Name can be stored as it is. >> >> >> no. That would have to be conditionalized depending on a special >> parsing flag option. There is also a number of tables indexed by >> the lowercase name and that will need to be preserved >> I hope the inclusion of the new option satisifies this comment. But, I am concerned about which tables might need to be taken care of, so that the engine is not broken. >> >>>- In other parts of the code (only in HTMLparser.c), the >>> comparsions using xmlStrEqual() for names, need to be >>> replaced by xmlStrcaseEqual(). >> >> >> I.e. makes a lot of costly calls instead of one costly and a number >> of cheap ones, I disagree with this approach. >> I hope this is also answered above. xmlStrcaseEqual() will not be used. I did make these changes, and tested once. I found that some tags during the parse are missing out. For example and in particular, the "body" tag seems to be missed out. Probably, this is because I haven't taken care of the tables which you have mentioned above. Best Regards, GPN From veillard@redhat.com Mon Oct 10 10:30:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312D23B2B50 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18111-09 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0423B26FB for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9AEUsDq010354; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:54 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9AEUsV31770; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:54 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9AEUssc014393; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:54 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j9AEUsUk014391; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:30:54 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: GPN Subject: Re: [xml] Changes which might be required "Not converting names to lower-case in HTML parsing" Message-ID: <20051010143053.GA12059@redhat.com> References: <433AA0E8.1010208@gmail.com> <20050928150633.GK23250@redhat.com> <433B9D24.7040608@gmail.com> <20050929091153.GR23250@redhat.com> <434A61E7.2050103@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <434A61E7.2050103@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.669 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_PM] X-Spam-Score: -4.669 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:30:58 -0000 On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:13:19PM +0530, GPN wrote: > Based on your inputs above, I am assuming that you are referring to > the options: > - enum xmlParserOption defined in include/libxml/parser.h > - enum htmlParserOption defined in include/libxml/HTMLparser.h teh second one, yes > htmlCtxtUseOptions() does the following - > a) Normalize the HTML options to XML options > Probably to reflect the options in the core parsing engine > b) Sets some members of the context structure > Probably for ease of condition checking. > > "HTML_PARSE_RETAINCASE" could be added as the additional option, > but need not reflect as a core XML parsing option. > Do we need to add a member in the context structure (something > like retainCase)? no, the remaining options should be kept in ctxt->options > Do these checks have to be made conditional? For e.g. > if (options & HTML_PARSE_RETAINCASE) { > if (!xmlStrcasecmp()) { > /* Code segment */ > } > } else { > if (xmlStrEqual()) { > /* Code segment */ > } > } yes, if (ctxt->options & HTML_PARSE_RETAINCASE) ... the code segment should not be duplicated of course, the conditional should be unified. > >>>- In htmlParseName(), the condition which checks if the > >>> current character is upper-case, and which transforms > >>> it needs to be removed. Name can be stored as it is. > >> > >> > >> no. That would have to be conditionalized depending on a special > >>parsing flag option. There is also a number of tables indexed by > >>the lowercase name and that will need to be preserved > >> > I hope the inclusion of the new option satisifies this comment. > But, I am concerned about which tables might need to be taken care > of, so that the engine is not broken. you will have to also generate the lower case version of the name and use it for lookup in those tables. > >> > >>>- In other parts of the code (only in HTMLparser.c), the > >>> comparsions using xmlStrEqual() for names, need to be > >>> replaced by xmlStrcaseEqual(). > >> > >> > >> I.e. makes a lot of costly calls instead of one costly and a number > >>of cheap ones, I disagree with this approach. > >> > I hope this is also answered above. xmlStrcaseEqual() will not be > used. > > I did make these changes, and tested once. I found that some tags > during the parse are missing out. For example and in particular, > the "body" tag seems to be missed out. Probably, this is because > I haven't taken care of the tables which you have mentioned above. Well, I can't tell .. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From jenos@ncsa.uiuc.edu Mon Oct 10 20:00:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5846E3B1385 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:00:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25255-05 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:00:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.2.28]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D203B23AB for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:00:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Envelope-From: jenos@ncsa.uiuc.edu X-Envelope-To: Received: from yams.ncsa.uiuc.edu (yams.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.234.2]) by mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j9B00fL26367 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:00:41 -0500 Received: from [141.142.232.41] (josie.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.232.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by yams.ncsa.uiuc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325C51FC00 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:51:40 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <434AFF8A.8090704@ncsa.uiuc.edu> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:55:54 -0500 From: Jeremy Enos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 - [MOOX M3] (Windows/20050804) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xml@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xml] API documentation per version of libxml? References: <4339D3E4.3020702@ncsa.uiuc.edu> <20050928075821.GF23250@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20050928075821.GF23250@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010505000700020304080707" X-NCSA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the help@ncsa.uiuc.edu for more information X-NCSA-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.746 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE, TW_BX, TW_IB] X-Spam-Score: -1.746 X-Spam-Level: X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:00:52 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010505000700020304080707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Daniel Veillard wrote: >On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:21:08PM -0500, Jeremy Enos wrote: > > >>Hi- >>I used the documentation on xmlsoft.org to write the code I needed for a >>parser. On my test machine, I had libxml2 2.6.x installed. Now I'm >>running into requests to make it back-compatible with version 2.5.10. >>Functions like xmlReadMemory, and xmlReaderForFile don't exist in >>2.5.10. What are my alternative options? >> >> > > Hum, the reader may not exist on 2.5 (I can't remember). > > > So there's no such thing as an xmlTextReaderPtr in 2.5? :( That's making my re-write much larger scale than I thought. >>Is there a snapshot of the API documentation that I could look at which >>dates back to version 2.5.10, or any specific version, for that matter? >>It seems like that would be critically necessary in order to code for it. >> >> > > grab the 2.5.10 release tarball it should be in doc/ > > At least in 2.5.4, the documentation simply links straight to xmlsoft.org, so that's creating a roadblock there. thx- Jeremy --------------010505000700020304080707 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Daniel Veillard wrote:

On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:21:08PM -0500, Jeremy Enos wrote:

Hi-
I used the documentation on xmlsoft.org to write the code I needed for a 
parser.  On my test machine, I had libxml2 2.6.x installed.  Now I'm 
running into requests to make it back-compatible with version 2.5.10.  
Functions like xmlReadMemory, and xmlReaderForFile don't exist in 
2.5.10.  What are my alternative options?


  Hum, the reader may not exist on 2.5 (I can't remember).

So there's no such thing as an xmlTextReaderPtr in 2.5? :( That's making my re-write much larger scale than I thought.

Is there a snapshot of the API documentation that I could look at which 
dates back to version 2.5.10, or any specific version, for that matter?  
It seems like that would be critically necessary in order to code for it.


  grab the 2.5.10 release tarball it should be in doc/

At least in 2.5.4, the documentation simply links straight to xmlsoft.org, so that's creating a roadblock there.
thx-

Jeremy

--------------010505000700020304080707-- From nilesh.jain@intel.com Mon Oct 10 21:13:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D553B144E for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:13:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29159-06 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:13:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr002.fm.intel.com (fmr14.intel.com [192.55.52.68]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F523B3163 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:13:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr101.fm.intel.com (fmsfmr101.fm.intel.com [10.253.24.21]) by fmsfmr002.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j9B1Dkw7011632; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:13:46 GMT Received: from fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.129]) by fmsfmr101.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id j9B1DYrI030853; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:13:46 GMT Received: from fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.148]) by fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id M2005101018134615610 ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:13:46 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.219]) by fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:13:46 -0700 Received: from 134.134.158.125 ([134.134.158.125]) by fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.219]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.intel.com ([192.168.65.22]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:13:46 +0000 Received: from nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com by email.intel.com; 10 Oct 2005 18:19:57 -0700 Subject: Re: [xml] RE: XML modules and interface From: "Jain, Nilesh" To: veillard@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050930091122.GE23250@redhat.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F9609081CB8@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> <20050930091122.GE23250@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:19:57 -0700 Message-Id: <1128993597.29725.7.camel@nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3-1.3.101mdk X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2005 01:13:46.0499 (UTC) FILETIME=[076FE530:01C5CE01] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.253.24.21 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:13:56 -0000 I have identified few other interfaces in some modules which I think should not be included in specs, I wanted to check with you before I do so. I have listed along with reasons. || Module || Interfaces || Reason || || HTMLparser || htmlNodeStatus|| Experimental || || tree || xmlDOMWrapAdoptNode, xmlDOMWrapReconcileNamespaces, xmlDOMWrapRemoveNode || Experimental || || Catalog || xmlCatalogGetSystem, xmlCatalogGetSystem || deprecated || || entities || xmlCleanupPredefinedEntities, xmlCreateEntitiesTable, xmlInitializePredefinedEntities || deprecated || || ParserInternals || xmlCheckLanguageID, xmlDecodeEntities, xmlParseQuotedString, xmlParserHandleReference, xmlScanName || deprecated || || valid || xmlCopyElementContent, xmlFreeElementContent,xmlNewElementContent, xmlSprintfElementContent || deprecated || || relxang || xmlRelaxNGParse || Unstable || || xmlSchema || xmlSchemaParse || Unstable || I have identified this by browsing the API document, I wanted to know is there a central place or list which you maintain for deprecated/not used symbols. Thanks, Nilesh From nilesh.jain@intel.com Mon Oct 10 21:18:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDAD3B2E5F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:18:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29589-02 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:18:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr001.fm.intel.com (fmr13.intel.com [192.55.52.67]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3903B29ED for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:18:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com (fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com [10.253.24.20]) by fmsfmr001.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j9B1ICoR010305; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:18:12 GMT Received: from fmsmsxvs040.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxvs040.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.124]) by fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id j9B1I6d7015422; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:18:12 GMT Received: from fmsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.156]) by fmsmsxvs040.fm.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id M2005101018181129435 ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:18:11 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.219]) by fmsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:18:11 -0700 Received: from 134.134.158.125 ([134.134.158.125]) by fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.219]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.intel.com ([192.168.65.22]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:18:11 +0000 Received: from nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com by email.intel.com; 10 Oct 2005 18:24:22 -0700 Subject: Re: [xml] libxml questions From: "Jain, Nilesh" To: veillard@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20051008033138.GB19390@redhat.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F960917AD84@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> <20051008033138.GB19390@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:24:22 -0700 Message-Id: <1128993862.29725.12.camel@nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3-1.3.101mdk X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2005 01:18:11.0768 (UTC) FILETIME=[A58CBB80:01C5CE01] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.253.24.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.746 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB] X-Spam-Score: -4.746 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:18:14 -0000 On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 23:31 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > The closest is the xmlschemas-dev@w3.org and > public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org archives at W3C (especially Kasimier > posts about it), I think there is a page at W3C too but I can't find it right > now. Thanks Daniel. From nilesh.jain@intel.com Tue Oct 11 01:38:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071DD3B0866 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:38:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11245-02 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:37:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr006.fm.intel.com (fmr16.intel.com [192.55.52.70]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460A73B0676 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:37:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com (fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com [10.253.24.20]) by fmsfmr006.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j9B5bwTD013168; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:37:58 GMT Received: from fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.129]) by fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id j9B5bJGH026500; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:37:58 GMT Received: from fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.148]) by fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id M2005101022375812275 ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:37:58 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.219]) by fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:37:58 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [xml] libxml questions Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:37:57 -0700 Message-ID: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F960923B3AB@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [xml] libxml questions Thread-Index: AcXLuNWVko3uiiYSRCa0NncxIwfX6ACbQRDA From: "Jain, Nilesh" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2005 05:37:58.0553 (UTC) FILETIME=[EFFF6090:01C5CE25] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.253.24.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.746 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB] X-Spam-Score: -4.746 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:38:06 -0000 > > The closest is the xmlschemas-dev@w3.org and >public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org archives at W3C (especially Kasimier >posts about it), I think there is a page at W3C too but I can't find it >right >now. Are you taking about http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema#dev=20 From nilesh.jain@intel.com Tue Oct 11 02:02:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B773B0A9E for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 02:02:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12561-03 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 02:02:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr001.fm.intel.com (fmr13.intel.com [192.55.52.67]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DEC3B32DD for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 02:01:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com (fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com [10.253.24.20]) by fmsfmr001.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j9B61lub024643; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:01:47 GMT Received: from fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.129]) by fmsfmr100.fm.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id j9B61lFh010947; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:01:47 GMT Received: from fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.148]) by fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id M2005101023014715271 ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:01:47 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.219]) by fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:01:47 -0700 Received: from 134.134.158.125 ([134.134.158.125]) by fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.219]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.intel.com ([192.168.65.22]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:01:46 +0000 Received: from nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com by email.intel.com; 10 Oct 2005 23:07:59 -0700 From: "Jain, Nilesh" To: veillard@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20051010032035.GB3759@redhat.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F96091F0B3E@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> <20051010032035.GB3759@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:07:58 -0700 Message-Id: <1129010878.15119.7.camel@nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3-1.3.101mdk X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2005 06:01:47.0398 (UTC) FILETIME=[43A7D260:01C5CE29] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.253.24.20 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.746 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB] X-Spam-Score: -4.746 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org Subject: [xml] XML regression test cases... X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:02:08 -0000 When I run external regression test (./testsuite) I see some errors, is it common errors or something is not setup correctly on my m/c. ## XML Schemas datatypes test suite from James Clark Ran 1035 tests, 11 errors, 0 leaks ## Relax NG test suite from James Clark Ran 253 tests, no errors ## Relax NG test suite for libxml2 Ran 183 tests, no errors ## NIST test suite for Schemas version NIST2004-01-14 Ran 23170 tests (3953 schemata), no errors ## Sun test suite for Schemas version Sun2002-01-16 Ran 193 tests (40 schemata), 27 errors (0 internals), 0 leaks ## Microsoft test suite for Schemas version MS2002-01-16 Ran 7230 tests (4686 schemata), 546 errors (1 internals), 0 leaks Total 32064 tests, 584 errors, 0 leaks Another question related to internal regression test suite (runtest), Are they used to confirm the behavior of public interface or What part of library do they validate? Do you think they are important to be part of LSB runtime test suite which is used to confirm distribution against the specification. Thanks, Nilesh From K.Buchcik@4commerce.de Tue Oct 11 05:40:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579633B22A4 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:40:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29303-02 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:40:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.firmenpost.de (europa.4commerce.de [213.239.204.146]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC17E3B216E for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:40:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPGcu-0004Ev-Ue; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:40:52 +0200 Received: from pegasus.omega.4commerce.de ([10.1.2.11]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPGcu-0004Eq-Av; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:40:52 +0200 Received: pegasus 10.1.2.11 from 10.1.72.1 10.1.72.1 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from librax by pegasus; 11 Oct 2005 11:40:54 +0200 From: Kasimier Buchcik To: "Jain, Nilesh" In-Reply-To: <1129010878.15119.7.camel@nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F96091F0B3E@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> <20051010032035.GB3759@redhat.com> <1129010878.15119.7.camel@nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:40:54 +0200 Message-Id: <1129023654.1272.16.camel@librax> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Subject: Re: [xml] XML regression test cases... X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at firmenpost.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: K.Buchcik@4commerce.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.firmenpost.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.746 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB] X-Spam-Score: -4.746 X-Spam-Level: Cc: ML-libxml2 X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:40:59 -0000 Hi, On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 23:07 -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote: > When I run external regression test (./testsuite) I see some errors, is > it common errors or something is not setup correctly on my m/c. The errors are partly due to incorrect tests, which have not yet been fixed by the WC3 XML Schema test collection initiative, partly due to not yet supported features and partly to incorrect behaviour of Libxml2's schema processor. The implementation of the schema processor is still work in progress, so the results will still change quite often in the near future. > ## XML Schemas datatypes test suite from James Clark > Ran 1035 tests, 11 errors, 0 leaks This tests xmlschemastypes.c via relaxng.c (which uses a tiny bit of xmlschemas.c) --> so the XML Schema data type module The errors are expected, since XML Schema data types disagrees here with some of Clark's tests. > ## Relax NG test suite from James Clark > Ran 253 tests, no errors > ## Relax NG test suite for libxml2 > Ran 183 tests, no errors this tests relaxng.c (xmlschemastypes.c as well?) --> so the RelaxNG module > ## NIST test suite for Schemas version NIST2004-01-14 > Ran 23170 tests (3953 schemata), no errors this tests xmlschemas.c with a strong focus on xmlschemastypes.c and XML Schema facets --> so the XML Schema data type module > ## Sun test suite for Schemas version Sun2002-01-16 > Ran 193 tests (40 schemata), 27 errors (0 internals), 0 leaks > ## Microsoft test suite for Schemas version MS2002-01-16 > Ran 7230 tests (4686 schemata), 546 errors (1 internals), 0 leaks > Total 32064 tests, 584 errors, 0 leaks this tests xmlschemas.c and xmlschemastypes.c --> so the XML Schema structure and data type modules Here we get the errors I mentioned at the top. > Another question related to internal regression test suite (runtest), > Are they used to confirm the behavior of public interface or What part > of library do they validate? Do you think they are important to be part > of LSB runtime test suite which is used to confirm distribution against > the specification. Regards, Kasimier From K.Buchcik@4commerce.de Tue Oct 11 05:54:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0AC3B18AC for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:54:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29932-04 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:54:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.firmenpost.de (europa.4commerce.de [213.239.204.146]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A7E3B35B0 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:54:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPGps-0004Go-7z for xml@gnome.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:54:16 +0200 Received: from pegasus.omega.4commerce.de ([10.1.2.11]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPGpr-0004Gi-1y for xml@gnome.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:54:15 +0200 Received: pegasus 10.1.2.11 from 10.1.72.1 10.1.72.1 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from librax by pegasus; 11 Oct 2005 11:54:17 +0200 From: Kasimier Buchcik To: ML-libxml2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:54:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1129024457.1272.29.camel@librax> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at firmenpost.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: K.Buchcik@4commerce.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.firmenpost.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Level: Subject: [xml] Initial implementation of redefinitions for the schema processor X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:54:24 -0000 Hi, We committed an initial support for "redefinitions" into the schema processor. Unfortunately, in order to implement redefinitions, we had to restructure most of the code which handles attribute declarations and attribute group definitions; so new bugs might have sneaked in, although the regression tests and the W3C test suite do not show any new errors. Redefinitions are not well tested though, and we'll be happy about anyone who can provide test cases or is eager to find bugs. The W3C test suite has a few test, but I did not went through them yet, and since this is a wobbly part of the spec, those tests might be useless. There was an important fix regarding default/fixed attributes, thus you might want to use the latest CVS revisions if you encounter problems. Have fun with it. Regards, Kasimier From veillard@redhat.com Tue Oct 11 09:48:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3833B37EF for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16266-02 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:48:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1458E3B37EA for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:48:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9BDmLQk008040; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:48:21 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9BDmLV00886; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:48:21 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9BDmLmC022858; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:48:21 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j9BDmLS9022856; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:48:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:48:21 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: "Jain, Nilesh" Subject: Re: [xml] libxml questions Message-ID: <20051011134821.GA17427@redhat.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F960923B3AB@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F960923B3AB@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.669 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_PM] X-Spam-Score: -4.669 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:48:47 -0000 On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:37:57PM -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote: > > > > The closest is the xmlschemas-dev@w3.org and > >public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org archives at W3C (especially Kasimier > >posts about it), I think there is a page at W3C too but I can't find it > >right > >now. > > Are you taking about http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema#dev nearly: http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-schema-test-suite/index.html Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From veillard@redhat.com Tue Oct 11 09:52:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2112B3B373B for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:52:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16575-08 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:52:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280BB3B2080 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:52:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9BDqkC1009717; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:52:46 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9BDqbV02267; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:52:41 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9BDqb6C024639; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:52:37 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j9BDqYbd024632; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:52:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:52:34 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: Kasimier Buchcik Subject: Re: [xml] XML regression test cases... Message-ID: <20051011135234.GB17427@redhat.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F96091F0B3E@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> <20051010032035.GB3759@redhat.com> <1129010878.15119.7.camel@nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com> <1129023654.1272.16.camel@librax> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1129023654.1272.16.camel@librax> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.669 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_PM] X-Spam-Score: -4.669 X-Spam-Level: Cc: ML-libxml2 X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:52:56 -0000 On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:40:54AM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote: > > Another question related to internal regression test suite (runtest), > > Are they used to confirm the behavior of public interface or What part > > of library do they validate? Do you think they are important to be part > > of LSB runtime test suite which is used to confirm distribution against > > the specification. I think runtest might be a good fit for the runtime tests, but it requires quite a bit of data, and results may still deviate a bit over time (sometimes serialization changes), it at least ensure most of the main APIs are working correctly. testapi is rather an internal test, and testsuite is way too focused on specific schemas issues (plus it requires globs of data). Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From K.Buchcik@4commerce.de Tue Oct 11 10:07:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B215A3B381F for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:07:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17335-09 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:07:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.firmenpost.de (europa.4commerce.de [213.239.204.146]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC933B3812 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:07:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPKkd-0004ir-Ms; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:05:07 +0200 Received: from pegasus.omega.4commerce.de ([10.1.2.11]) by mail.firmenpost.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPKkd-0004il-9p; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:05:07 +0200 Received: pegasus 10.1.2.11 from 10.1.72.1 10.1.72.1 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from librax by pegasus; 11 Oct 2005 16:05:10 +0200 From: Kasimier Buchcik To: Daniel Veillard In-Reply-To: <20051011135234.GB17427@redhat.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F96091F0B3E@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> <20051010032035.GB3759@redhat.com> <1129010878.15119.7.camel@nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com> <1129023654.1272.16.camel@librax> <20051011135234.GB17427@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:05:09 +0200 Message-Id: <1129039509.1272.42.camel@librax> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Subject: Re: [xml] XML regression test cases... X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at firmenpost.de X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: K.Buchcik@4commerce.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.firmenpost.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Level: Cc: ML-libxml2 X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:07:16 -0000 Hi, On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:52 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:40:54AM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote: > > > Another question related to internal regression test suite (runtest), > > > Are they used to confirm the behavior of public interface or What part > > > of library do they validate? Do you think they are important to be part > > > of LSB runtime test suite which is used to confirm distribution against > > > the specification. > > I think runtest might be a good fit for the runtime tests, but it requires > quite a bit of data, and results may still deviate a bit over time (sometimes > serialization changes), it at least ensure most of the main APIs are working > correctly. > > testapi is rather an internal test, and testsuite is way too focused > on specific schemas issues (plus it requires globs of data). s/testsuite/runsuite Kasimier From veillard@redhat.com Tue Oct 11 11:10:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07023B0AD4 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:10:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22889-09 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:10:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774BD3B352D for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:10:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9BFA0wd007642; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:10:00 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9BF9xV28470; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:09:59 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9BF9xDa020023; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:09:59 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j9BF9xID020020; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:09:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:09:59 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: "Jain, Nilesh" Subject: Re: [xml] RE: XML modules and interface Message-ID: <20051011150959.GC17427@redhat.com> References: <795389EE3D82B947880FBDA87E7F3F9609081CB8@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com> <20050930091122.GE23250@redhat.com> <1128993597.29725.7.camel@nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1128993597.29725.7.camel@nikka-dev.jf.intel.com.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.669 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, TW_BX, TW_IB, TW_PM] X-Spam-Score: -4.669 X-Spam-Level: Cc: xml@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:10:28 -0000 On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:19:57PM -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote: > I have identified few other interfaces in some modules which I think > should not be included in specs, I wanted to check with you before I do > so. I have listed along with reasons. > > || Module || Interfaces || Reason || > || HTMLparser || htmlNodeStatus|| Experimental || hum, was contributed, I don't really remember what it is used for :-) -> drop > || tree || xmlDOMWrapAdoptNode, xmlDOMWrapReconcileNamespaces, > xmlDOMWrapRemoveNode || Experimental || xmlDOMWrapAdoptNode and xmlDOMWrapRemoveNode may be used by PHP but it's not critical to keep them. -> drop, okay > || Catalog || xmlCatalogGetSystem, xmlCatalogGetSystem || deprecated || -> drop > || entities || xmlCleanupPredefinedEntities, xmlCreateEntitiesTable, > xmlInitializePredefinedEntities || deprecated || -> drop > || ParserInternals || xmlCheckLanguageID, xmlDecodeEntities, > xmlParseQuotedString, xmlParserHandleReference, xmlScanName || > deprecated || -> drop > || valid || xmlCopyElementContent, > xmlFreeElementContent,xmlNewElementContent, xmlSprintfElementContent || > deprecated || -> drop > || relxang || xmlRelaxNGParse || Unstable || Warning is old, API is in use now -> keep > || xmlSchema || xmlSchemaParse || Unstable || Warning is old, API is in use now -> keep > > I have identified this by browsing the API document, I wanted to know is > there a central place or list which you maintain for deprecated/not used > symbols. Not really, there is the legacy.c module with a bunch of them, but some function are really still exported because they were public at some point and I didn't want to introduce regression, and in other case because they are needed for multiple modules. It's history .... Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From Pavan.Vedantam@fmcti.com Tue Oct 11 13:08:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664C13B3A3F for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:08:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31830-05 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:08:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from plmler3.mail.eds.com (plmler3.mail.eds.com [199.228.142.73]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31523B3A6B for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:08:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from plmlir2.mail.eds.com (plmlir2-2.mail.eds.com [199.228.142.132]) by plmler3.mail.eds.com (8.13.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9BH86AP006624 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:08:07 -0500 Received: from plmlir2.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plmlir2.mail.eds.com (8.13.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9BH79uX000322 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:07:09 -0500 Received: from usplmfmc03.chicago.fmcweb.com ([128.254.113.13]) by plmlir2.mail.eds.com (8.13.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9BH79k5000316 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:07:09 -0500 Received: by usplmfmc03.chicago.fmcweb.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <4GDJK9P2>; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:07:12 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Vedantam, Pavan" To: xml@gnome.org Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:16:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5CE87.5C992798" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.746 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE, TW_BX, TW_IB] X-Spam-Score: -1.746 X-Spam-Level: Subject: [xml] How to creata one big DOM from Multiple DOMS X-BeenThere: xml@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Gnome XML library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:08:10 -0000 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5CE87.5C992798 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, I am using Libxml2 to parse the xml documents and build DOMS, I would like to know if there is a provision for linking the DOMS so that all the DOMS are under one ROOT ?, i.e I should be able to traverse the DOMS through one starting point, just like a tree. regards, Pavan ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5CE87.5C992798 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How to creata one big DOM from Multiple DOMS

Hi,
I am using Libxml2 to parse the xml = documents and build DOMS, I would like to know if there is a provision = for linking the DOMS so that all the DOMS are under one ROOT ?, i.e I = should be able to traverse the DOMS through one starting point, just = like a tree.

regards,
Pavan
=A0

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5CE87.5C992798-- From veillard@redhat.com Tue Oct 11 13:28:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml@gnome.org Delivered-To: xml@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1913B293A for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:28:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00839-10 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:28:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C173B3668 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:28:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9BHSQMD029850; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:28:26 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9BHSLV13620; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:28:21 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9BHSLgr007988; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:28:21 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j9BHSLDE007986; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:28:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:28:21 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: "Vedantam, Pavan"