On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 14:23, Roy-Magne Mo wrote:
Roy-Magne, I think pozilla.sh is already very good in telling you what you can do if you don't pay much attention in using it (and it's options) :-)On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Fatih Demir wrote: > 2002-01-04 -- 21:55:17 (+0100) -- R.I.P. Deaddog: > > There should be also a "don't send out any mails" option for it in the > last "releases", so that you can play with it without getting fear of > being flames by anyone ;-) IMHO pozilla should only send out mail, when explicitly told to. It warns you on first run and the text messages are also very clear in pointing out what pozilla.sh will do -- there's of course always the way to alias pozilla.sh to "pozilla.sh -D" so that pozilla.sh will run in dry modus and shouldn't send out any EMails. Normally it should work with this "inhibiting" options just the way it should do. A short $ pozilla.sh --helpwill list you up many options with which you can surely control pozilla.sh (almost always ;-)) to work like you want it to work... And BTW: The messages about Nautilus just did bring some translators to attention on some points of Nautilus translations etc. (whether this may be good or bad is another story indeed). Abel, anyone, more objections about pozilla.sh?
|
This is a digitally signed message part