Re: [Usability] What happened to Undo?

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:47:04PM +0100, Calum Benson wrote: 
> Not a lot... the relevant bugs are still open, and I don't recall any
> clear agreement on whether we should have Undo (last micro-change),
> Revert (which is to Cancel as Apply is to OK), or (Reset to) Defaults. 
> I think the majority vote was for Undo, though, even though it has more
> potential to leave settings in an unstable state than the other two, so
> I'm prepared to accept defeat on that one :) 

Seems to me that Defaults is both more often what you want (a
full-scale safety button) and also easier to implement...

Havoc