Re: [Usability] UI review of overwrite dialog

[Karim Nassar <karim nassar acm org>]

On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 09:51 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> the dialogue show the following buttons:
> 
> _Skip | _Overwrite | _Cancel Ripping | Overwrite _All | _Ignore All

Seems to me that according to
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/2.0/windows-alert.html#alert-button-order

the order would be "better" as:

Skip | Skip All | Cancel Rip | Overwrite All | Overwrite

if you agree with me that overwrite is the affirmative action. (Skip
just seems like a "no means yes" choice, hence less affirmative.)


> [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130782

Does the dialog point out the case when the rip appears to be a repeat
as Havoc suggested?

-- 
Karim Nassar
Department of Computer Science
Box 15600, College of Engineering and Natural Sciences
Northern Arizona University,  Flagstaff, Arizona 86011
Office: (928) 523-5868 -=- Mobile: (928) 699-9221