Re: [patch] pop failure / flock fix



On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 18:16:52 Ian Campbell wrote:
> 
> I think we should mark any changes we make to libmutt with BALSA in a
comment,
> so we know where we have changed stuff when we want upgrade libmutt.
> 
yes, definitly. we don't want synchs to bring up old bugs :|

> My main reason for this is that I have just finished investigating why all
> headers aren't included in the list. According to libmutt/ChangeLog the bug
> has
> been fixed in the past and written over by an upgrade.
> 
ye gods

> Perhaps we can also standardize on using FIXME as a marker for known
> problems??
> 

go for it :)

cheers

-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]