Re: [patch] pop failure / flock fix
- From: Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>
- To: balsa List <balsa-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [patch] pop failure / flock fix
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 18:32:16 +0100
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 18:16:52 Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> I think we should mark any changes we make to libmutt with BALSA in a
comment,
> so we know where we have changed stuff when we want upgrade libmutt.
>
yes, definitly. we don't want synchs to bring up old bugs :|
> My main reason for this is that I have just finished investigating why all
> headers aren't included in the list. According to libmutt/ChangeLog the bug
> has
> been fixed in the past and written over by an upgrade.
>
ye gods
> Perhaps we can also standardize on using FIXME as a marker for known
> problems??
>
go for it :)
cheers
--
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]