Re: new idl



On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 19:30:42 Jules Bean wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:00:23AM +0100, chbm@chbm.nu wrote:
> > 
> > Just when i was about to use the corba interface in a gnome-pilot conduit
i
> > noticed the idl is no more :) 
> > That's why i moved to write a new one. Then i noticed my gob/idl/corba
clue
> > wasn't very big :) So, here goes a preliminary sketch of the idl. Anyone
has
> > comments ? stuff that should be in there? stuff that won't be easy to
> > actually get done ? 
> 
> Does Evolution define an email IDL?  If so, shouldn't we conform to

now that you mention it yes, it should. i'll have a look at that. we could
implement a subset yeah. it would save me the trouble of trying to figure out
a good interface too :)

> that.  (Miguel, you read this list?)
> 
i don't think so :) 


-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]