Re: Threading



On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:26:48 Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > 
> > I think we should aim for jwz's algorithm, it has been well tested and is
> > the best one I've ever seen from a usability standpoint (with the
> > placeholder messages especially)
> > 
> 
> I definately like the look of it.
> 
here here 

> Perhaps we should commit the CTree conversion stuff now (since it can't
> hurt...), but not put threading in until it is implemented properly.
> 
simple to split, but the threading code is so small it go in as experimental
and then be updated. it could go into --enable-all. we need a "use threading"
option anyway. per box preferably :)

> BTW, Does balsa put useful References and In-Reply-To headers in mail it
> sends?
> 

In-Reply-To:   <20000913142904.L10140@grommit.office.vi.net>; from
               jules@jellybean.co.uk on Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 14:29:04 +0100
X-Message-ID:    <20000913150120.A28646@whisky.cprm.net>
References:    <20000913142904.L10140@grommit.office.vi.net>
Mailer:      Balsa 0.9.4

yes

-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]