Re: 1.1.7 or 1.2pre?

[Kurt Guenther <Kurt Guenther serent com>]

I'm a newbie to balsa, but I've found the 1.2pre2 more stable then the 1.1.7.  I've been using it for about 200 messages/day since it came out with very few problems.   I still can't get the spell checker working on Redhat 7.1/Ximian, but this didn't work with 1.1.7 either.  (I'll compile the sources when I get a chance.)

--Kurt

On 2001.08.28 08:33 Jules Bean wrote:
> (Yes, I'm behind on the list again)
> 
> I'm about to compile some new debian packages (fix that stupid CFLAGS
> thing which breaks HTML mail, hopefully).
> 
> So, 1.1.7 again, or 1.2pre?  I normally avoid -pre versions, and I've
> seen some suggestions of instability on this list, but since I haven't 
> tried it, I'm poorly placed to judge.  What would you recommend for
> inclusion in debian?
> 
> Jules
> 
> _______________________________________________
> balsa-list mailing list
> balsa-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
> 
>