Re: bug with the Message-ID ?

[Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>]

On 2001.12.03 12:04:08 +0000 M. Thielker wrote:


> 
> I would opt for adding an option to sippress the message id completely, not 
> based on any checks or the port number but with a simple checkbox on prefs.
> Most systems currently in use will use port 25 for submission as well as 
> forwarding and will distinguish between the two by the recipients address. 
> Some, like CIS, will not accept a message id if the transaction is deemed 
> to be a submission.
> Forcing Balsa to use a port other than 25 for this to work will only serve 
> to limit Balsa's usability because a corporation as big as CIS _will_ not 
> change the way their server works just because _one_ program requires it.
> 

Compuserve seems to still be a bbs. Welcome to the Internet. if you really 
really want to use compuserve twist one of the existing smtp
proxys to strip message-ids


-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds