Re: Full Headers?
- From: Brian Stafford <brian stafford uklinux net>
- To: balsa microwave com
- Cc: Brian Stafford <brian stafford uklinux net>,Peter Bloomfield <bloomfld eos ncsu edu>,Pawel Salek <pawsa TheoChem kth se>, balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Full Headers?
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:25:57 +0100
On Tue, 10 July 16:07 balsa@microwave.com wrote:
>
> Er, yes, thats why I mentioned 2822 in parens.. I dont beleive, however,
> that 2822 makes any significant changes to the format often referred to as
> "RFC-822" format, other than possibly a rename to "RFC-2822" format..
RFC 2822 clarifies many ambiguities in 822, corrects mistakes, is rather
less liberal in the permitted syntax of headers. It devotes 8 pages to
obsolete syntax and appendix B lists 30 significant changes from earlier
standards. Not all valid RFC 822 messages are valid RFC 2822 messages.
Brian Stafford
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
