Re: Balsa + libESMTP patch
- From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jose jaimedelamo eu org>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Balsa + libESMTP patch
- Date: 03 May 2001 09:12:29 +0200
El 02 May 2001 18:20:19 +0100, Brian Stafford escribió:
> On Wed, 2 May 17:37 Carlos Morgado wrote:
>
> | > Given that a reliable SMTP client is available for posting mail,
> | > why does one need sendmail to do it instead?
> | >
> | surely you don't sugest we remove the local mta option from balsa ?
>
> Why not? Nothing is lost.
I think that removing that option is not a good idea. Anyway in all
Unix systems a local MTA is installed, because a lot of programs
(especially cron.d scripts) needs one to send their status to the local
root. And I prefer sending mail through my local mailer, as it queues my
mails until they can be delivered, and I don't need to use the relay
mail provided by my ISP which is really slow.
Anyway, I think that using libSMTP in balsa can be a good idea, as a
lot of people coming from Windows are used to put a relay smtp in all
their MUA, and some "Unix people" may choose that this is a good
solution.
What I thing have no sense to do is removing the local MTA option.
Both things can coexist fairly good.
Regards.
--
José Carlos García Sogo Seahorse(-bonobo) developer
jose jaimedelamo eu org http://seahorse.sourceforge.net
Key-Id: 0x90788E11
Fingerprint = B06B 023F EAA6 37DC 1E62 B079 4BE0 5825 9078 8E11
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]