Re: RFC mailbox interface

[Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>]

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:48:46PM -0600, David M . Stowell wrote:
> On 2001.11.08 16:05 Magick wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > 
> > I am thinking about changing Balsa to use its own mailbox functions, or a
> > library if the right one is found. Reading past discussions i noticed 
> > that
> > some people have some strong ideas how the interface should look like.
> 
> <clipped for brevity>
> 
> As long as support for the major mail storage systems (mbox, MH, and 
> especially Maildir) is not diosturmbed, that only the interface is 
> improved. I see no problem. I would be be extremely distressed if basa 
> started using a "proprietary" mail storage system, or if balsa dropped 
> support for Maildir. That's what drove me away from Spruce.
> 

Balsa will not drop any of those. 

-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A 
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
[you don't have enough disk space for this sig]