Re: Reply to Group?

[Martin Leopold <mleopold worldonline dk>]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:37:40 Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> libbalsa_find_word(pair[0], "x-beenthere x-mailing-list to") should 
> probably just be libbalsa_find_word(pair[0], "x-beenthere 
> x-mailing-list"). The `to' address is in a separate message->to_list; I 
> guess we could use that as a fallback if we don't find "x-beenthere" or 
> "x-mailing-list", but only if it's a single address; if there's more 
> than one, how can we tell which is the mailing-list?

I'm subscribed to a mailing list with wich reply-group doesn't work (local 
mbox). After looking at the headers I noticed that neither x-beenthere or 
x-mailing list were not included in the header. The list is run by ezlml 
(chosen by my ISP) and in the documentation they don't say anything about 
how to set it up to send any of the 2 fields.

So i tried to look ouround for the "official" filds in some rfc, but I 
couldn't find any resebleing those 2. What I could find, though, was 
RFC2369 which doesn't talk about any of the fields but about list-help, 
list-post and others. Do you know what the "right" fields are?

If RFC2369 is the only document on the subject wouln't it be right to set 
the reply address when selecting grop-reply to the value of the 
"List-Post" field instead? If I look at the headers from the ezmlm managed 
list the list-post field is included, so this would solve my problem.

-- 
Regards Martin Leopold.
Dept. of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen