Re: Balsa: Indirect linking to OpenSSL via LGPL and OpenLDAP libs
- From: Peter Bloomfield <PeterBloomfield bellsouth net>
- To: chbm chbm nu
- Cc: Balsa List <balsa-list gnome org>,Andrew Lau <netsnipe debianplanet org>
- Subject: Re: Balsa: Indirect linking to OpenSSL via LGPL and OpenLDAP libs
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:05:04 -0500
On 2002.12.19 05:14 Carlos Morgado wrote:
>
> On 2002.12.19 09:20:50 +0000 Andrew Lau wrote:
>> Dear Peter,
>> So how should I go about trying to convince Balsa to add
>> an OpenSSL exclusion clause to its license? Doing so would not
>> weaken any protections that Balsa already has under the normal
>> GPL. Would the consent of the versions 2.0 authors (from
>> file): Emmanuel Allaud, Carlos Morgado, Pawel Salek and
>> yourself (Peter Bloomfield) be enough?
>>
>
> I don't think there's a lot of convincing to do, I for one
> don't opose it nor i think Pawel does (but he's otherwise busy
> so we haven't heard much from him). Peter doesn't seem to mind,
> Emmanuel ? Am I missing someone who feels strongly against it
> and has copyright over balsa code ?
>
> I still want to get OK from Stuart Parmenter, the original
> balsa developer. I'm sure he has no problems with it but it
> doesn't hurt to ask :)
I have no problem with it. I'm intrigued by the gnutls
alternative, though: if it works and would allow us to go back to
a clean GPL, I believe we should look into it.
Peter
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]