Re: Balsa: Indirect linking to OpenSSL via LGPL and OpenLDAP libs



On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:31:27PM -0500, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> IMHO, it's enough to get explicit consent from the listed authors of
> Balsa 2, and air the question on the list, as you have.  Anyone who
> contributed code to earlier versions, and might conceivably have an
> objection, is bound to have become aware of the issue.

So what date are we looking at for Balsa's license change? When 2.0.4
comes out?

Yours sincerely,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau              Computer Science & Student Rep, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it                 Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
*     <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0>      <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>     *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]