Re: HTML alternative part is default & broken



On 2002.12.31 06:56 Lynn Kerby wrote:
> Is someone working on using ghttp or something to provide the missing
> functionality?  Should I?

I guess that functionality is very interesting, as long as it is 
switched on only for white-listed source addresses/http servers. I 
would not like send a confirmation to spammers that some of their spams 
got through the filters.

That's of course my VHO.

-pawel



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]