Re: Balsa 2
- From: Ali Akcaagac <ali akcaagac stud fh-wilhelmshaven de>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Balsa 2
- Date: 14 Feb 2002 19:57:55 +0100
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 19:27, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > but this means it needs more than it gets right now:
> > - gconf support (not that i like it but it seem to be a must for gnome2)
> > - remove depracted librarycalls.
> > - ui polish etc.
> > - code polish.
> - code restructuring
> - speed optimization..
>
> > the only info i got so far is some stuff there some stuff here but no
> > real roadmap for balsa... what is going on right now any comments or
> > something ? i think a more serious attempt to get balsa moving is needed
> > than doing some tweaks there and here to get it running on gnome2.
> A (partial) rewrite of balsa would be needed indeed. But would it be
> wise to do that during the gnome2 porting?
yes a lot of stuff in gnome 2 is in codefreeze already.
http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/schedule/
i think getting balsa moved as soon as possible is needed. people expect
a working mail client for gnome 2 and i would be happy to see balsa as
the first one.
--
Name....: Ali Akcaagac
Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science
E-Mail..: mailto:ali.akcaagac@stud.fh-wilhelmshaven.de
WWW.....: http://www.fh-wilhelmshaven.de/~akcaagaa
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]