Re: Balsa 2



On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 19:27, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > but this means it needs more than it gets right now:
> > - gconf support (not that i like it but it seem to be a must for gnome2)
> > - remove depracted librarycalls.
> > - ui polish etc.
> > - code polish.
> - code restructuring
> - speed optimization.. 
> 
> > the only info i got so far is some stuff there some stuff here but no
> > real roadmap for balsa... what is going on right now any comments or
> > something ? i think a more serious attempt to get balsa moving is needed
> > than doing some tweaks there and here to get it running on gnome2.
> A (partial) rewrite of balsa would be needed indeed. But would it be
> wise to do that during the gnome2 porting?

yes a lot of stuff in gnome 2 is in codefreeze already.

http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/schedule/

i think getting balsa moved as soon as possible is needed. people expect
a working mail client for gnome 2 and i would be happy to see balsa as
the first one.

-- 
Name....: Ali Akcaagac
Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science
E-Mail..: mailto:ali.akcaagac@stud.fh-wilhelmshaven.de
WWW.....: http://www.fh-wilhelmshaven.de/~akcaagaa




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]