Re: content-disposition attach / inline

[Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>]

On 2002.02.20 18:55:47 +0000 Albrecht Dre? wrote:

> 
> IMHO, a *real* file (not only text; think e.g. of application/pdf) may 
> always have the "attachment; filename=..." disposition type, opposed to 
> messages (message/rfc822) which sould always be inline. If I remember 
> correctly, this is requested by the rfc, but I moved recently and did not 
> yet find all docs again. Hmmm....
> 

i don't get the idea message/rfc822 should always be inline from rfc2183.
i get the idea inline/attach should be user controlled as it's meant to
influence the way the message is presented.

i believe the best thing to do here is disable it till UI is written for
it, and that's what i plan to do if noone comes up with a good plan

-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds