Re: Reply-To header

[Brian Stafford <brian stafford uklinux net>]

On Thu, 21 February 17:09 Thomas Maeder wrote:
> Am 2002.02.21 10:31 schrieb(en) Brian Stafford:
>> 
>> Omitting To: Cc: and Bcc: headers from a message is entirely legal 
>> according to RFC 2822.  A message is required only to provide originator 
>> fields and Date:
>> 
>> So balsa does nothing wrong when To/Cc/Bcc are empty provided the SMTP 
>> envelope lists the correct recipients.
> 
> Depends on your definition of "wrong".

Oh, for fucks sake.  Does *anybody* actually UNDERSTAND or listen to what I'm 
trying to say?  The SMTP envelope, which determines message delivery, is 
independent of the recipient headers in the message.  This is clear to any 
fool who actually thinks about it, having read 2821 and 2822.