Re: Balsa vs. Evolution
- From: Paulo Andre' <l16083 alunos uevora pt>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Balsa vs. Evolution
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:59:29 +0000
Hi,
On 2002.01.20 00:34 Ali Akcaagac wrote:
> > * Has much slower startup
>
> yeah but evolution has more things to offer, you should take this into
> consideration. where balsa is just a mailer, evolution is a whole pim.
Well, I can't really bash Evolution even if I wanted to since I never
seriously tried it. However, I can just wonder at how much more things
Evolution has to offer. I mean, the tarball is like 10MB! Compared to
balsa, it's damn huge.
> > So my question is this: What are the major differences? And
> advantages of
> > Balsa?
>
> speed. follows mbox rules in good old unix style. a lot of people uses
> it etc...
Yeah, that's a good thing, imho. Anyway, since someone tricked me into
balsa (*hint*hint*) I find it really nice for being a real lightweight
and still having everything I need implemented in a sane way (well,
most things).
// Paulo Andre'
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]