Re: [Q] Send functions oddness
- From: Emmanuel <e allaud wanadoo fr>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Q] Send functions oddness
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:58:03 -0400
Le 11.09.2002 18:54, Carlos Morgado a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:58:00PM -0400, Emmanuel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm discovering libmutt's internals while trying to fix the send
> behaviour.
> > Here are my questions :
> > - why process_queue have the encoding and flow parameters.
> These
> > look like per-message parameters, and I don't understand why they are
> > applied to the whole queue. We should have a way (via special headers
> for
> > example) to store them within the queue if necessary.
> > - could someone explain the mechanism of copy (more or less)
> > represents libbalsa_create_msg, and the meaning of its queue parameter?
>
> we have a global format=flowed parameter, it's not per-message
>
Yes but if you queue one mail and the you change enconding or flow
parameter in your prefs, what do we do when we send the queued mails? And
yes I agree, this is not a big issue ;-)
Bye
Manu
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]