Re: Comments please: gpg/rfc 3156 support for balsa (looong) (and gmime)

[Emmanuel <e allaud wanadoo fr>]

Le 2003.02.25 13:55, Carlos Morgado a écrit :
> 
> On 2003.02.25 17:28:24 +0000 Emmanuel wrote:
> 
>>> i'm all for pgp on 2.0 but as i said before the backend work will 
>>> be at
>>> least partially lost if we do use gmime so, this looks like a good 
>>> time
>>> to ask, does anyone have anything to say against using gmime ?
>>> (gmime can be made part of the balsa tarball to avoid yet another
>>> dependency)
>> 
>> Hm the question is : if Albrecht has something which is almost 
>> working in the 2.0.x frame, do we want to wait any longer to have 
>> pgp support?
> 
> I didn't mean "don't do it" - i meant keep in mind this will probably
> not be definitive if the gmime thing pushes forward. also, gmime does
> this so it's a good source of err example code :) (i'm fairly sure
> jeffrey doesn't mind :))
> 

I understood you, but I just wanted to state my thought here.

>> So I think we could evaluate if Albrecht's work is advanced enough 
>> to give us an immediate support of pgp in balsa-2.0.x, and then 
>> decide what to do?
> 
> yes - that's a good description of what's happening.
> i just wanted to put this forward now so that the list can give input 
> on
> it and albrecht doesn't feel well, betrayed :)
> 

I'm sure he does not ;-)
Bye
Manu