gpg feedback
- From: Troy Jendra <troy cannex com au>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: gpg feedback
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:31:51 +1000
Hi all
Just downloaded balsa 2.0.10 to test out the gpg functionality.
First off, the configure script couldn't find gpgme, but continued on
as normal, however I noticed in the summary that it wasn't going to be
installed, maybe it should exit with an error as I did explicitly ask
it to be included?
Then I installed gpgme 0.3.15 into a non-standard directory. I thought
I could just supply that directory name to the configure command but
that didn't work, I eventually stumbled onto making sure that
gpgme-config was in the path, and finally things worked!
I then started to test sending messages to myself. Our mail server is
using mimedefang to restrict attachments, so I had some fun. To send a
signed message to myself, I had to make mimedefang allow
application/pgp-signature attachments. Works great! Now encrypted
messages on the other hand need to allow application/pgp-encrypted
which is ok, but also application/octet-stream with an inline
disposition. Now this second attachment is a bit of a problem to me,
as I couldn't find an example of how to allow it. I'll be upgrading
mimedefang soon so when I do that I'll try to sort it out, till then I
will do without encrypting messages.
I also got to and installed the enigmail plugin to mozilla mail. I
tried to send both a signed and an encrypted message to balsa, but it
didn't recognise them as being signed or encrypted. I think it doesn't
use attachments(probably the other rfc that has been talked about...)
However on sending a signed message from balsa, mozilla enigmail
correctly noticed the message was signed(I didn't test an encrypted
message because of the problem above).
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Troy
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]