Re: new gmime/gpg bug

[Albrecht Dreß <albrecht dress arcor de>]

Am 04.07.04 18:20 schrieb(en) Pawel Salek:
> > as depracted  (e.g.  g_mime_part_get_content()).You may remember that I  
> > posted several  crypto  related improvements already in 2.0 a while ago  
> > which were never  accepted  (see   
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/balsa-list/2004-May/msg00067.html),
> > and they require gmime 2.1.5 or later.
>
> I guess I can commit that patch if gmime-2.1.5 does not break anything  
> else: I trust your judgement!

O.k., below is a new version of that big patch - the only differences to  
those noted in the message above are that it now works cleanly with  
today's cvs, and that the minimum requested gpgme version is 0.9.0, fixing  
problems with revoked key certs.

Apart form the Balsa (imap and rfc 3156) and gmime (multipart/signed, but  
this seems to improve) problems, there is afaik now only one open gpgme  
bug: when using gpg 1.2 configured for automatic key retreival, gpgme  
falsely returns a "no data" error if retreiving an unknown key failed  
instead of "no key". It has to be fixed in gpgme, though, and the gpg  
people claim that it's gone with gpg 1.3/1.9.

Oh, btw, IMHO we should really make gmime 2.1.7 the minimum requested  
version; there were some fixes since 2.1.5.

Cheers,
	Albrecht.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Albrecht Dreß  -  Johanna-Kirchner-Straße 13  -  D-53123 Bonn (Germany)
      Phone (+49) 228 6199571  -  mailto:albrecht dress arcor de
_________________________________________________________________________

Attachment: gpgme-2.2-2004-07-07.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Attachment: pgpxTKR9POdNL.pgp
Description: PGP signature