Re: 'Delete' v. 'Move to trash'
- From: Craig Routledge <webstuff craigroutledge com>
- To: Balsa List <balsa-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: 'Delete' v. 'Move to trash'
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:19:57 +0000
On 01/07/2005 04:35:56 PM, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
Not necessary--the issue is the way that Balsa adds `Delete' as an
alternative accelerator. If that's removed, so that `D' for `move to
trash' and `Ctrl+D' for `toggle deleted' are the only accelerators, you
can bind `Delete' to either one in the usual way. As Andrew noted, what
happens is that first the existing accelerator is removed but not
replaced (I guess that's the standard meaning of hitting `Delete'), and
the second time you `Delete', it establishes `Delete' as the accelerator.
That setup seems to offer the most flexibility--all that remains is
deciding how to cope with user reaction to taking away an accustomed
accelerator!
Strange, I can't assign delete to any menu item in gcalctool, gedit or
gnome-terminal (which were the ones I tried). But if it works for everyone
else, I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
(gtk 2.4 and gnome 2.8 on Fedora Core 3 by the way)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]