Re: Another word-wrap issue...

["Mark A. Flacy" <mflacy verizon net>]

On 2007.06.01 10:41, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> Hi Mark:
>
> On 06/01/2007 10:53:10 AM Fri, Mark A. Flacy wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > In my work account, I include a .signature file which does not  
> > contain  the signature separator.  I have the "Add Signature  
> > Separator" option  checked for that account.  The mail is sent with  
> > "format=flowed".
> >
> > I noticed when viewing the copy that the text flow algorithm does  
> > not  handle the "-- " line correctly by merging my name in the  
> > following line  with it.  Frankly, I'm not sure how it could handle  
> > that correctly,  unless you attached the signature block as a MIME  
> > attachment.
>
>
> I haven't yet been able to reproduce that.  I don't use  
> auto-signature, so  I set up a small test file (no separator line) and  
> an identity to include  it (with the separator), and it seemed to be  
> handled correctly.  Could you  send me a message where it fails?   
> Sanitized, of course!

(Jumps up and down while foaming at the mouth)

*Bleep*!  Just like the *last* time I complained about "format=flowed",  
it's the *bleeping* *bleepity* *bleep* Exchange Server that's screwing  
things up.

This message looked just fine when previewed in the Draftbox.  When I  
looked at the raw messages, I noticed that the work e-mail had "--=20\r"  
as the signature separator.  (*All* the lines ended with a \r, for that  
matter.)

So this e-mail will look just fine. 

--
Mark A. Flacy