Bug#597995: marked as done (balsa: uninstallable due to old libesmtp5)

[owner bugs debian org (Debian Bug Tracking System)]

Your message dated Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:39:03 +0200
with message-id <4CA727E7 9000501 debian org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597995: balsa: uninstallable due to old libesmtp5
has caused the Debian Bug report #597995,
regarding balsa: uninstallable due to old libesmtp5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner bugs debian org
immediately.)


-- 
597995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597995
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner bugs debian org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• From: <krogar online ru>
• To: <submit bugs debian org>
• Subject: dselect says `goodbye'
• Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:01:47 +0400

Package: dselect
Version: 1.15.8.5

Hello
I will install any package by dselect , but dselect say  :
"1) epiphany-extension-gwget depends on epiphany-browser (<<2.30) 
(install "epiphany-browser --version "GNOME Web Browser 2.30.6"")
2) "balsa depends on libesmtp5 (<=0.8.8) BUT libesmtp5 does not appear to
be available (no install package)"

Need edit where there are
System - Debian-AMD test on date 201009250800 

Galina

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu debian org>
• Cc: 597995-done bugs debian org
• Subject: Re: Bug#597995: balsa: uninstallable due to old libesmtp5
• Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:39:03 +0200

On 29/09/10 22:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 25/09/10 19:04, Guillem Jover wrote:
>>>> 2) "balsa depends on libesmtp5 (<=0.8.8) BUT libesmtp5 does not appear to
>>>> be available (no install package)"
>>>
>>> This does not seem to have been reported, so I'm reassigning this bug
>>> report to balsa. I guess it just needs a binNMU against a newer
>>> libesmtp-dev (libesmtp6).
>>
>> Yes, a rebuild solves the problem.
>>
>> Release Team, please binNMU balsa on all architectures.
> 
> Scheduled.

Thanks, the dependency on libesmpt5 is gone, balsa now depends on libesmtp6.

Regards,
Emilio

--- End Message ---