Re: [Banshee-List] ADO.net and ECMA

[Aaron Bockover <abockover novell com>]

We will not move away from System.Data, nor will we entertain patches
of the sort. Over time we can expect more APIs to become standardized
under ECMA.

I do not care about what the anti-Mono crowd says.

Let's instead focus on actually improving Banshee in meaningful ways.

--Aaron


On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Hughes<trampster gmail com> wrote:
> Also if they could standardize System.Core, it would be awesome.
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Daniel Hughes <trampster gmail com> wrote:
>>
>> Standardizing ADO.net would be by far the best solution. I wish Miguel the
>> best of luck in his efforts.
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Gabriel Burt <gabriel burt gmail com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Daniel Hughes<trampster gmail com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Microsoft has chosen not to standardise ADO.net for whatever reason....
>>> > The
>>> > mono answer to another non standard library (winforms) was to provide a
>>> > superior alternative. All I'm suggesting is that we do the same here.
>>>
>>> My understanding is that ADO.NET hasn't been standardized only because
>>> of a lack of manpower in the ECMA committee to review it.  Miguel has
>>> stated he wants to get it standardized.  This is a powerful tool in
>>> our toolkit.
>>>
>>> Gabriel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> banshee-list mailing list
>>> banshee-list gnome org
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/banshee-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> banshee-list mailing list
> banshee-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/banshee-list
>
>