Re: [Banshee-List] Binary releases
- From: Gabriel Burt <gabriel burt gmail com>
- To: Matt Sturgeon <mttza1 gmail com>
- Cc: banshee-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Banshee-List] Binary releases
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:47:31 -0600
They certainly have a build-farm for building Linux software, it's
called the openSUSE Build Service: https://build.opensuse.org/
It doesn't support OS X, and it only supports Windows via mingw (which
I think will actually work great).
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Matt Sturgeon <mttza1 gmail com> wrote:
> Or how about Novell's build infrastructure?
>
> Surely they could provide us with nightly's for Mac, Win and Lin -
> plus official releases?
>
> You'd think Novell would have Macs Windows PCs and Linux PCs setup to
> build software...
>
> At the very least, as the sponsor (and brand owner?) they should
> finance a Mac plus Windows licence...
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On 26 February 2011 18:42, Matt Sturgeon <mttza1 gmail com> wrote:
>> For the topic of adding Mac build-process instructions to the website,
>> please see bgo#643376
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643376
>>
>> For discussion about providing hardware for the Banshee project to
>> build binary packages for Mac, Windows (and Linux?) please continue to
>> use this thread ("Re: [Banshee-List] Binary releases").
>>
>>
>>
>> Regarding the hardware, would the GNOME Foundation consider allowing
>> the Banshee project to use a Mac (and a copy/license for Windows -
>> VirtualBox) in order to provide regular (even automated nightly)
>> builds?
>>
>> Alternatively is there a infrastructure for building using remote
>> machines? You send off your source and it sends back Mac, Windows, RPM
>> and DEB packages...
>>
>> Or better yet it pulls in your source nightly and builds/publishes
>> automatically, but you still do candidates and releases
>> manually/semi-manually...
>>
>>
>> Any other suggestions?
>>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]