Re: [BuildStream] Platform - Sandbox refactoring
- From: Jürg Billeter <j bitron ch>
- To: Sander Striker <s striker striker nl>, Benjamin Schubert <ben c schubert gmail com>
- Cc: "buildstream-list gnome org" <buildstream-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [BuildStream] Platform - Sandbox refactoring
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 06:54:16 +0100
On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 14:55 +0000, Sander Striker via BuildStream-list
wrote:
It does, with one caveat. Once we land a buildbox based sandbox,
does that logic not all move there instead of BuildStream? I believe
we have a mention of that in another thread as well.
Yes, while I agree that Benjamin's proposal sounds sensible, I indeed
would like to move the sandbox abstraction into BuildBox such that this
abstraction can be used for both local builds and remote execution,
avoiding code duplication.
This will not happen in time for BuildStream 1.4 but my goal is to have
BuildBox as the only `Sandbox` backend in BuildStream 1.6 (besides
remote execution, of course).
Also see the BuildBox architecture proposal¹ and the issue 719².
Cheers,
Jürg
¹ https://lists.buildgrid.build/pipermail/buildgrid/2018-November/000069.html
² https://gitlab.com/BuildStream/buildstream/issues/719
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]