Re: [BuildStream] Responsive, but not overly verbose UX - not-in-scheduler
- From: Jonathan Maw <jonathan maw codethink co uk>
- To: Tristan Van Berkom <tristan vanberkom codethink co uk>
- Cc: buildstream-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [BuildStream] Responsive, but not overly verbose UX - not-in-scheduler
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:23:30 +0100
On 2019-06-07 18:46, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 18:04 +0100, Jonathan Maw wrote:
Hi Tristan,
(comments inline)
Umm I think you misunderstood something here, before I go on with the
rest of this message I want to check that it is not based on a false
assumption.
Let me clarify:
The frontend and it's interaction with Stream() shell *never* be
changed by a process separation of the internal scheduling process.
All of this process separation shall be made completely transparent
to the code in `_frontend/`, which only talks to Stream().
Stream() decides how to carry out it's work, if Stream() decides to
run the scheduler in a subprocess, that is it's business, but the
code in `_frontend/` shall continue to just treat Stream as it would
any other library, and receive callbacks in it's own process.
Does this change anything for you ?
Hi Tristan,
This clarification lines up with my understanding of what to do, but I'm
glad to have it spelled out explicitly.
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Maw, Software Engineer, Codethink Ltd.
Codethink privacy policy: https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]