Re: [BuildStream] Renaming junction `target` option name
- From: Chandan Singh <chandan chandansingh net>
- To: Tristan Van Berkom <tristan vanberkom codethink co uk>
- Cc: BuildStream <buildstream-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [BuildStream] Renaming junction `target` option name
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 17:44:37 +0100
Hi Tristan,
There is consensus enough that it is worth renaming the option
+1
Decision time
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The MR is up and currently does the "link" thing, I'll be happy to
change it again, my favorite is still of course "inherit".
I don't like `use` as much as it seems rather vague. Personally, I'd
be okay with both `link` and `inherit`.
To pick one, my vote will be for `link`. This is because `inherit`
reminds me of inheritance in OO terms, which makes me think that my
project is somehow going to inherit all elements from the subproject.
And `link`ing seems close enough to what we're doing.
Cheers,
Chandan
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]