Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot



On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, brian moseley wrote:

> http://www.imc.org/draft-ietf-calsch-cap
> if you want to be strictly conformant to rfc 2445, i'd
> suggest using something like X-GNOME-TOMBSTONE.

Dude, thanks for the link. During the GUADEC I got together with Frederico
and discussed. We agreed that even though all the listener stuff was
beautifull, it was just too complex a solution for a relatively simple
problem.

So we'll revert to having the calendar store the changes in a seperate
file for synchronization clients (eg. creating a TOMBSTONE calendar) and
then figger out some mechanism for letting these sync clients iterate the
list and delete them.

More on this will follow.

/dev/eskil
---



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]