Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot
- From: Eskil Heyn Olsen <deity dbc dk>
- To: calendar-list gnome org
- cc: gnome pilot list <gnome-pilot-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:02:15 +0100 (CET)
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, brian moseley wrote:
> http://www.imc.org/draft-ietf-calsch-cap
> if you want to be strictly conformant to rfc 2445, i'd
> suggest using something like X-GNOME-TOMBSTONE.
Dude, thanks for the link. During the GUADEC I got together with Frederico
and discussed. We agreed that even though all the listener stuff was
beautifull, it was just too complex a solution for a relatively simple
problem.
So we'll revert to having the calendar store the changes in a seperate
file for synchronization clients (eg. creating a TOMBSTONE calendar) and
then figger out some mechanism for letting these sync clients iterate the
list and delete them.
More on this will follow.
/dev/eskil
---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]