[gnome-shell] user-menu: Be more cautious about saving status
- From: Florian MÃllner <fmuellner src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [gnome-shell] user-menu: Be more cautious about saving status
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:26:07 +0000 (UTC)
commit 4ce0e809562bb10dc092343a926c72c1cf25c0f9
Author: Florian MÃllner <fmuellner gnome org>
Date: Tue Oct 11 21:53:29 2011 +0200
user-menu: Be more cautious about saving status
When requesting a presence change, the actual presence set by
mission control does not necessarily match the requested presence
(if an active account does not support the requested presence),
which may result in the wrong presence being restored.
As a fix, be more cautious about saving status by assuming that
users do not request presence changes between an automatic presence
change request and the actual change.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661485
js/ui/userMenu.js | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/js/ui/userMenu.js b/js/ui/userMenu.js
index 40ca2f3..311ba73 100644
--- a/js/ui/userMenu.js
+++ b/js/ui/userMenu.js
@@ -285,7 +285,12 @@ IMStatusChooserItem.prototype = {
if (presence == Tp.ConnectionPresenceType.AVAILABLE)
this._presence.setStatus(GnomeSession.PresenceStatus.AVAILABLE);
- if (!this._expectedPresence || presence != this._expectedPresence)
+ // We ignore the actual value of _expectedPresence and never safe
+ // the first presence change after an "automatic" change, assuming
+ // that it is the response to our request; this is to account for
+ // mission control falling back to "similar" presences if an account
+ // type does not implement the requested presence.
+ if (!this._expectedPresence)
global.settings.set_int('saved-im-presence', presence);
else
this._expectedPresence = undefined;
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]