[gdk-pixbuf] pixops: Be smarter than gcc's optimizer
- From: Benjamin Otte <otte src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [gdk-pixbuf] pixops: Be smarter than gcc's optimizer
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:09:13 +0000 (UTC)
commit dd4b061c27dc0865c8f8987d294de6e04b321c18
Author: Benjamin Otte <otte redhat com>
Date: Sat Aug 22 23:06:23 2015 +0200
pixops: Be smarter than gcc's optimizer
gcc realizes that the overflow checks aren't necessary. Why not?
Well, if an int overflows, the behavior is undefined. And turning on
-fomit-instructions is valid behavior in an undefined situation.
gdk-pixbuf/pixops/pixops.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/gdk-pixbuf/pixops/pixops.c b/gdk-pixbuf/pixops/pixops.c
index b7951c7..5564a40 100644
--- a/gdk-pixbuf/pixops/pixops.c
+++ b/gdk-pixbuf/pixops/pixops.c
@@ -1272,18 +1272,17 @@ make_filter_table (PixopsFilter *filter)
int i_offset, j_offset;
int n_x = filter->x.n;
int n_y = filter->y.n;
- int n_weights;
int *weights;
- n_weights = SUBSAMPLE * SUBSAMPLE * n_x;
- if (n_weights / (SUBSAMPLE * SUBSAMPLE) != n_x)
- return NULL; /* overflow, bail */
+ /* check n_x doesn't overflow */
+ if (G_MAXINT / (SUBSAMPLE * SUBSAMPLE) < n_x)
+ return NULL;
- n_weights *= n_y;
- if (n_weights / (SUBSAMPLE * SUBSAMPLE * n_x) != n_y)
- return NULL; /* overflow, bail */
+ /* check n_y doesn't overflow */
+ if (G_MAXINT / (SUBSAMPLE * SUBSAMPLE * n_x) < n_y)
+ return NULL;
- weights = g_try_new (int, n_weights);
+ weights = g_try_new (int, SUBSAMPLE * SUBSAMPLE * n_x * n_y);
if (!weights)
return NULL; /* overflow, bail */
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]